[Bug 653865] Re: Please backport ubuntu-font-family-sources (0.68+ufl-0ubuntu1) from maverick/main

2011-02-18 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 650889 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650889

Good to know, and glad their available. Thanks for the info Paul. I
certainly didn't mean to imply anything nefarious by the phrase "special
Canonical powers."

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653865

Title:
  Please backport ubuntu-font-family-sources (0.68+ufl-0ubuntu1) from
  maverick/main

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 653865] Re: Please backport ubuntu-font-family-sources (0.68+ufl-0ubuntu1) from maverick/main

2011-02-18 Thread Paul Sladen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 650889 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650889

Andrew: I've duped this against bug #650889 ("Ubuntu Font Family would
be valuable for older releases") as it might be interesting to read the
back story.  The discussions did involve several Ubuntu archive
administrators (not necessarily Canonical ones...) and certain other
people with a strong interest to allow it to be exceptionally processed
as a Stable Release Update!  In this case;

  1. The Ubuntu Font Family is closely associated with the Ubuntu brand and 
users have proven extremely enthusiastic to get it
  2. Is a  leaf-node package (does not depend on anything else); containing 
only data
  3. We really want people to running the latest version of the fonts (to help 
clean out early test versions)
  4. A package from the repository can be further updated; random .ttfs 
installed in ~/.fonts/ cannot
  5. A user has to intentionally choose to install the package themselves from 
the Ubuntu Software Centre (it is not automatic, or to be depended upon)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653865

Title:
  Please backport ubuntu-font-family-sources (0.68+ufl-0ubuntu1) from
  maverick/main

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 653865] Re: Please backport ubuntu-font-family-sources (0.68+ufl-0ubuntu1) from maverick/main

2011-02-18 Thread Paul Sladen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 650889 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650889

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 650889
   Ubuntu Font Family would be valuable for older releases
 * You can subscribe to bug 650889 by following this link: 
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-font-family-sources/+bug/650889/+subscribe

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653865

Title:
  Please backport ubuntu-font-family-sources (0.68+ufl-0ubuntu1) from
  maverick/main

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 604711] Re: [test-pkg-a] Please backport python-django 1.2.1

2011-02-18 Thread Phong Nguyen
Any chance the 1.2.3 packages can be built and backported?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604711

Title:
  [test-pkg-a] Please backport python-django 1.2.1

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports