[Bug 777135] [NEW] backuppc 3.2.0 to lucid-backports
Public bug reported: natty has 3.2.0-3ubuntu4, it's been 2 years and 8 months since the previous version (3.1.0) which is in lucid. This release contains a few new features and significant number of bug fixes. Please backport this. ** Affects: lucid-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: backuppc lucid natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777135 Title: backuppc 3.2.0 to lucid-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 777143] [NEW] Please backport quassel 0.7.2-0ubuntu2 from natty to maverick and lucid
Public bug reported: Built and tested 0.7.2-0ubuntu2 in both lucid and maverick environments. It builds, installs, runs. Ack from ubuntu-backporters. ** Affects: lucid-backports Importance: Wishlist Status: In Progress ** Affects: maverick-backports Importance: Wishlist Status: In Progress ** Also affects: lucid-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: lucid-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: maverick-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777143 Title: Please backport quassel 0.7.2-0ubuntu2 from natty to maverick and lucid -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 777143] Please backport quassel 0.7.2-0ubuntu2 from natty to maverick and lucid
I: Extracting quassel_0.7.2-0ubuntu2.dsc ... done. I: Building backport of quassel as 0.7.2-0ubuntu2~lucid1 ... done. ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777143 Title: Please backport quassel 0.7.2-0ubuntu2 from natty to maverick and lucid -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 734731] Please backport irssi (0.8.15-1ubuntu1/main) from maverick to lucid
I: Extracting irssi_0.8.15-1ubuntu1.dsc ... done. I: Building backport of irssi as 0.8.15-1ubuntu1~lucid1 ... done. ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734731 Title: Please backport irssi (0.8.15-1ubuntu1/main) from maverick to lucid -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 775204] Re: Please Backport Firefox 4
Please review https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports. I don't think this particular backport meets the criteria described on the above page. rent0n wrote Well, I think most people would consider Firefox 4 to be perfectly stable. That isn't enough of a reason to backport this package in my opinion. Even if you can show some poll validating your claim, Ubuntu is not a democracy. Have you tested it? In our household three users have tried firefox 4. Two of the three use Ubuntu and went back to firefox 3.6 due to stability issues. The Ubuntu users were using the Mozilla Team PPA. The third user runs Windows 7 and runs both versions of firefox with different profiles. And when I say stability issues I mean firefox 4 crashed a number of times, and firefox 3.6 rarely crashes. Firefox 4 also particularly annoyed me when it would not restore all the windows and tabs from the last session, it would usually only restore some of them. rent0n wrote No one forces you to use a backported version though, you can always use the 3.6 version in the normal lucid repos. Thanks for your comment but I would prefer to use backports, rather than a 3rd party repository. On the backports community page it states: 4. Applications to be backported must have meaningful benefits to the user not attainable via other processes... I pointed out where you can install it via other processes. Furthermore the Mozilla Team isn't just any third party, they maintain the firefox packages in Ubuntu's main archives along with the Mozilla Security Team. See https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775204 Title: Please Backport Firefox 4 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 777143] Please backport quassel 0.7.2-0ubuntu2 from natty to maverick and lucid
I: Extracting quassel_0.7.2-0ubuntu2.dsc ... done. I: Building backport of quassel as 0.7.2-0ubuntu2~maverick1 ... done. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777143 Title: Please backport quassel 0.7.2-0ubuntu2 from natty to maverick and lucid -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
