[Bug 684842] Re: Please backport git 1.7.3.2 to Maverick
That would be fine, however I have updated to Natty so I don't need it anymore. Thanks a lot for replying though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684842 Title: Please backport git 1.7.3.2 to Maverick -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 684842] Re: Please backport git 1.7.3.2 to Maverick
** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684842 Title: Please backport git 1.7.3.2 to Maverick -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 783006] Re: Please backport focuswriter 1.3.2.git.69e4975b-1 from oneiric to lucid, maverick, natty
I tested focuswriter 1.3.2.git.69e4975b-1~lucid1~ppa2 from the PPA on Lucid. It installed and ran without problems. Unlike the Maverick version, no text was printed to stderr as it ran. ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783006 Title: Please backport focuswriter 1.3.2.git.69e4975b-1 from oneiric to lucid, maverick, natty -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 783006] Re: Please backport focuswriter 1.3.2.git.69e4975b-1 from oneiric to lucid, maverick, natty
(In case it's relevant, even though it doesn't have to be tested on multiple architectures--this Lucid system was also i386.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783006 Title: Please backport focuswriter 1.3.2.git.69e4975b-1 from oneiric to lucid, maverick, natty -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 783006] Re: Please backport focuswriter 1.3.2.git.69e4975b-1 from oneiric to lucid, maverick, natty
Great. ACK from backporters. ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783006 Title: Please backport focuswriter 1.3.2.git.69e4975b-1 from oneiric to lucid, maverick, natty -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 721886] Re: Please backport tor-arm 1.4.0.1-2 from natty to lucid, maverick
Thanks Evan. I've tested the packages, using them to monitor a Tor relay. Both look good. -Damian ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721886 Title: Please backport tor-arm 1.4.0.1-2 from natty to lucid, maverick -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 721886] Re: Please backport tor-arm 1.4.0.1-2 from natty to lucid, maverick
Ack, missed the last bit of the comment - I installed and ran them both on karmic but not maverick/lucid. This is a pure python package and been exercised on several Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Arch Linux, and Slackware versions already without any platform-specific issues. If it's really _vital_ that I set up a maverick and lucid vm to test this again I can. However, that would be a lot of work for what, in reality, would be a pointless test (it would just be checking yet again that python is cross-platform). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721886 Title: Please backport tor-arm 1.4.0.1-2 from natty to lucid, maverick -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 721886] Re: Please backport tor-arm 1.4.0.1-2 from natty to lucid, maverick
Our experience has been that this test is not pointless, which is why it is a hard requirement for the backports process. Testing inside of a lucid/maverick chroot is acceptable, but testing on a different release is not. ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: Confirmed = Incomplete ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721886 Title: Please backport tor-arm 1.4.0.1-2 from natty to lucid, maverick -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 721886] Re: Please backport tor-arm 1.4.0.1-2 from natty to lucid, maverick
Found a volunteer that tested on lucid (10.04), still trying to find someone with maverick. ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721886 Title: Please backport tor-arm 1.4.0.1-2 from natty to lucid, maverick -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 788818] Re: Assertion failure when unbound generates an empty error reply in response to a query
Fixed in oneiric. unbound (1.4.10-1ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low * Merge from debian unstable. Remaining changes: - Fix build to work with default python other than python2.6 - Generalize install rule in debian/python-unbound.install - Use pyversions -d to determine where to install .so files instead of hard coding python2.6 - Remove hard coded XB-Python-Version: 2.6 from debian/control -- Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com Thu, 26 May 2011 15:44:54 -0400 unbound (1.4.10-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release: - CVE-2011-1922. -- Robert S. Edmonds edmo...@debian.org Wed, 25 May 2011 15:48:34 -0700 ** Changed in: unbound (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788818 Title: Assertion failure when unbound generates an empty error reply in response to a query -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 788818] Re: Assertion failure when unbound generates an empty error reply in response to a query
The actual upstream change once you filter through all the tool cruft between 1.4.9 and 1.4.10. Also confirmed by looking at the upstream svn. See svn diff -c2419 in http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/svn/trunk/ . I may get time for debdiffs later, but here's the basic patch in case someone wants to run with it. It definitely applies to natty and needs investigation for lucid/maverick. ** Attachment added: Upstream patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/788818/+attachment/2144008/+files/patch ** Changed in: unbound (Ubuntu Natty) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: unbound (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788818 Title: Assertion failure when unbound generates an empty error reply in response to a query -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 654591] Re: Please backport boinc 6.10.58+dfsg-3 and boinc-app-seti 5.13+cvs20060510-7 from Maverick to Lucid
ACK from backporters. ** Summary changed: - Please backport boinc and boinc-app-seti from Maverick to Lucid + Please backport boinc 6.10.58+dfsg-3 and boinc-app-seti 5.13+cvs20060510-7 from Maverick to Lucid ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: lucid-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654591 Title: Please backport boinc 6.10.58+dfsg-3 and boinc-app-seti 5.13+cvs20060510-7 from Maverick to Lucid -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 788818] Re: Assertion failure when unbound generates an empty error reply in response to a query
debdiff for Natty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788818 Title: Assertion failure when unbound generates an empty error reply in response to a query -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 788818] Re: Assertion failure when unbound generates an empty error reply in response to a query
Remembered to add the bug number to debian/changelog ** Patch added: Natty debdiff again https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unbound/+bug/788818/+attachment/2144271/+files/natty.debdiff ** Changed in: unbound (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Triaged = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788818 Title: Assertion failure when unbound generates an empty error reply in response to a query -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 788818] Re: Assertion failure when unbound generates an empty error reply in response to a query
Testing done for Natty: None - This is the same change to 1.4.9 that upstream made for 1.4.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788818 Title: Assertion failure when unbound generates an empty error reply in response to a query -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
