[Bug 885092] [NEW] Ubuntu 0.80 fonts for Lucid

2011-11-02 Thread Teg
Public bug reported:

Can you backport the 0.80 version of ttf-ubuntu-font-family from
Oneiric or Precise for 10.04? The .deb and source code are available at
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/u/ubuntu-font-family-sources/
and it would be a great way to give these fonts to users of the LTS
versions of Ubuntu.

** Affects: lucid-backports
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: fonts

** Tags added: fonts

** Description changed:

  Can you backport the 0.80 version of ttf-ubuntu-font-family from
- Oneiric for 10.04? The .deb and source code are available at
+ Oneiric or Precise for 10.04? The .deb and source code are available at
  http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/u/ubuntu-font-family-sources/
  and it would be a great way to give these fonts to users of the LTS
  versions of Ubuntu.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885092

Title:
  Ubuntu 0.80 fonts for Lucid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/885092/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 885092] Re: Backport+SRU ubuntu-font-family=0.80 fonts for Lucid

2011-11-02 Thread Iain Lane
Thanks, this will likely be done in -updates via SRUing rather than in
-backports.

** Changed in: lucid-backports
   Status: New = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885092

Title:
  Backport+SRU ubuntu-font-family=0.80 fonts for Lucid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/885092/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: [Bug 874651] Re: Please backport tickr 0.5.3-1

2011-11-02 Thread Iain Lane
Hello,

On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 12:12:56PM -, Emmanuel Thomas-Maurin wrote:
 There is now a patch in Debian that make tickr able to build with ld
 --as-needed: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647311

OK, when you get the patch uploaded to Debian it will be automatically
synced to Precise (if done before December 29th). After this happens we
can look again at the backport.

Please set this bug report to New when that happens.

 status incomplete

Cheers,

-- 
Iain Lane  [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer   [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer   [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
PhD student   [ i...@cs.nott.ac.uk ]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874651

Title:
  Please backport tickr 0.5.3-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/874651/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 885092] Re: Backport+SRU ubuntu-font-family=0.80 fonts for Lucid

2011-11-02 Thread Paul Sladen
** Summary changed:

- Ubuntu 0.80 fonts for Lucid
+ Backport+SRU ubuntu-font-family=0.80 fonts for Lucid

** Also affects: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Paul Sladen (sladen)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885092

Title:
  Backport+SRU ubuntu-font-family=0.80 fonts for Lucid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/885092/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 885092] Re: Backport+SRU ubuntu-font-family=0.80 fonts for Lucid

2011-11-02 Thread Paul Sladen
** Tags added: uff-sru

** Summary changed:

- Backport+SRU ubuntu-font-family=0.80 fonts for Lucid
+ Backport+SRU ubuntu-font-family=0.80 (minus Medium) for old supported

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885092

Title:
  Backport+SRU ubuntu-font-family=0.80 (minus Medium) for old supported

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/885092/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 846922] Re: quassel-core creates world-readable directories

2011-11-02 Thread Tyler Hicks
Unsubscribing ubuntu-security-sponsors since all packages going into the
security pocket have been released.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846922

Title:
  quassel-core creates world-readable directories

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/846922/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 865907] Re: [FFe] [SRU] please backport tracker 0.12.6-1 from Debian experimental to Oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Alternatively, we should probably sync tracker 0.12.7-1 from Debian
experimental to Precise first.

NEW in 0.12.7 - 2011-10-27
==

The changes are:

  * Fixes: GB#662364: tracker-search-bar: Don't display the results in a broken 
fashion
  * Fixes: NB#287970: tracker-utils: Display nameGiven and nameFamily when 
fullname is empty
  * Fixes: NB#287972: ttl2sgml: Fixed memory leak
  * tracker-extract,gstreamer: Handle streams with no tags
  * libtracker-miner,crawler: Use a cancellable per crawled directory
  * libtracker-miner,buffer: Improve logging of sparql errors
  * tracker-writeback: Apply writeback handlers sequentially on a same file
  * tests/libtracker-common: Complete tests for tracker-utils.c
  * tests/libtracker-common: testing tracker_sched_idle
  * tests/libtracker-common: Test for tracker-albumart

Translations:

  * Updated es: Daniel Mustieles
  * Updated lt: Aurimas Černius
  * Updated sl: Matej Urbančič

** Description changed:

  Tracker 0.12 is the latest stable release of GNOME's search engine. It
- is needed for GNOME Documents. I've tested version 12.3-1 by letting it
+ is needed for GNOME Documents. I've tested version 12.6-1 by letting it
  index my home directory and I ran some searches. The indexed documents
  showed up in GNOME Documents as they were supposed to.
  
  Build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/81619551/buildlog_ubuntu-
  oneiric-amd64.tracker_0.12.3-1~ppa1_BUILDING.txt.gz
+ 
+ Tracker 0.12 has been in the GNOME 3 PPA for a month now (since October
+ 5). I've been running it on my computer for a month and I've not seen a
+ single complaint about it not working.
+ 
https://launchpad.net/~gnome3-team/+archive/gnome3/+builds?build_text=trackerbuild_state=all

** Summary changed:

- [FFe] [SRU] please backport tracker 0.12.6-1 from Debian experimental to 
Oneiric
+ Please backport tracker to Oneiric

** Also affects: oneiric-backports
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865907

Title:
  Please backport tracker to Oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/865907/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Opening backports pre-release

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
Greetings, Tech Board -
  The backports team has been playing with a proposal for about a year
now that we'd like to finally submit to you folks.

Currently, during the period between FeatureFreeze and release (about
1/3 of the cycle!), it's impossible to upload either new packages or
new features to Ubuntu (freeze exceptions excluded). Post-release,
this is an issue already addressed by the backports process. We'd like
to propose extending the use of backports by opening the backports
pocket for uploads and Debian syncs at FeatureFreeze, and then copying
the contents of the backports pocket to the x+1 release when it opens,
similar to what we do already for SRUs.

We would still enforce the current backports requirements (the package
must build, install, and run, any reverse-dependencies must still
work with the new package, and all uploads must be approved by a
backporter). These requirements are stronger than those for general
archive uploads, so we don't believe that there is significant risk to
post-release archive quality of x+1.

I see a handful of potential issues with this, and I only have answers
for some of them, so if the TB is generally interested in the idea,
I'd certainly appreciate feedback and suggestions:

 - Skew between backports (and therefore x+1) and the main archive:
bugfixes in release not making it into backports, versions in release
superseding those in backports, etc. In general, I think we would want
a mechanism to invalidate packages in the backports pocket whenever
that package is uploaded to the release pocket, and possibly to the
proposed pocket, though I don't know what that is.

 - Archive admin workload. All backports currently require some action
from archive admins. For no-source-change uploads, an archive admin
runs a script on the archive master. For source-change uploads,
because they are uploaded post-release, they are automatically put
into the unapproved queue. Additionally, new packages have to go
through sourceNEW and binNEW. Our proposal would create additional
work for the archive admins near release time, which may be
problematic.

 - Upload privileges. I believe that currently anybody on ~ubuntu-dev
can upload any package to the backports pocket, and backporters can
approve backports of packages they otherwise would not be able to
upload. The backports team would prefer to maintain that - would it be
sufficient to ensure that manual backports uploads always go through
unapproved?

 - Component isolation. All packages in the backports pocket build
with all components enabled. This means that if we copy binaries to
x+1, we could be copying binaries built against packages from the
wrong component. It might make sense to only pocket copy source
packages into the x+1 release, instead of all packages.

If the TB approves this, the backports team would gladly take
responsibility for proposing patches to Launchpad, ubuntu-dev-tools,
ubuntu-archive-tools, and anything else we've forgotten that needs
modification to support the new workflow.

I know this is rather late notice, but I'll go ahead and add this to
tomorrow's meeting agenda in the hopes that there's time to discuss
it. I'm also generally available for in-person or IRC discussion.

Thanks,

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 876572] Re: Please backport espresso 4.3.2-1 from precise

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
Our standards for runs are really much simpler than that. Starts
might be more appropriate, really. If you start it, does it crash?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876572

Title:
  Please backport espresso 4.3.2-1 from precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/876572/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 877674] Re: Please backport activity-log-manager (0.8.0-1) from precise

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
Great, thanks for verifying. ACK from backporters

** Changed in: oneiric-backports
   Importance: Undecided = Wishlist

** Changed in: oneiric-backports
   Status: Confirmed = In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877674

Title:
  Please backport activity-log-manager (0.8.0-1) from precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/877674/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 876572] Re: Please backport espresso 4.3.2-1 from precise

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
(I'm going to mark the bug as Incomplete for our own tracking, but
please feel free to set the status of the bug to Confirmed if it does
run.)

** Changed in: oneiric-backports
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876572

Title:
  Please backport espresso 4.3.2-1 from precise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/876572/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 852603] Re: Update to 0.9.16

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
For the purposes of tracking by the backports team, I'm going to mark
this bug as Incomplete.

If you can verify that the hedgewars package in Precise builds,
installs, and runs on Oneiric, please mark the bug back to Confirmed

** Summary changed:

- Update to 0.9.16
+ Please backport hedgewars (0.9.16-1) from precise to oneiric

** Changed in: oneiric-backports
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852603

Title:
  Please backport hedgewars (0.9.16-1) from precise to oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/852603/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
For Ubuntu Backports, we only backport packages from within the Ubuntu
archive. Since libgdata in Precise is still at 0.9, there's nothing for
us to backport.

I would expect (but don't know) that the desktop team would be looking
to upload the new libgdata to the archive soon. For our tracking
purposes, I'm going to mark this bug as Incomplete for now. Once the new
version of libgdata is available, please test that it builds, installs,
and runs on Oneiric, and then mark this bug as Confirmed.

(Alternatively, you can set it back to New and the backporters team
would be happy to help you with the verification process)

** Changed in: oneiric-backports
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878704

Title:
  libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/878704/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 801996] Re: Please backport squid3 v3.1.x

2011-11-02 Thread Andrew Mitchell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 652204 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652204

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 652204
   Please backport squid3 3.1.6-1.1ubuntu1 from maverick to lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801996

Title:
  Please backport squid3 v3.1.x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/801996/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 827167] Re: Please backport Clamav 0.97

2011-11-02 Thread Micah Gersten
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 848117 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848117

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 848117
   Backport clamav 0.97.2 from natty-updates to hardy, lucid, and maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827167

Title:
  Please backport Clamav 0.97

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/827167/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 882169] Re: Backport kst from precise to natty and oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
I have tested building kst 2.0.3-1 on oneiric, and it fails to build
with the following error:

make[2]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
Install the project...
/usr/bin/cmake -P cmake_install.cmake
-- Install configuration: Debug
-- Installing: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libkst2core.so.2.0.3
-- Installing: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libkst2core.so.2
-- Installing: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libkst2core.so
-- Installing: /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libkst2math.so.2.0.3
CMake Error at src/libkstmath/cmake_install.cmake:48 (FILE):
  file INSTALL cannot copy file
  /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/build/lib/libkst2math.so.2.0.3
  to /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp/usr/lib/libkst2math.so.2.0.3.
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  src/cmake_install.cmake:38 (INCLUDE)
  cmake_install.cmake:37 (INCLUDE)


make[1]: *** [install] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
dh_auto_install: make -j1 install DESTDIR=/«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp returned 
exit code 2
make: *** [binary] Error 29
dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit statu

I unfortunately don't know my way around kst's build system, but if
there is a simple fix for the bug, we can backport the package with that
fix.

For the time being, I'm going to mark the bug as Incomplete to indicate
that it is currently unfit to be backported, but if somebody determines
how to fix the build, please feel free to change it back to New (or, if
you're able to test that the package builds, installs, and runs, feel
free to set the bug to Confirmed)

** Changed in: oneiric-backports
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: natty-backports
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882169

Title:
  Backport kst from precise to natty and oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/natty-backports/+bug/882169/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 860506] Re: Backport native package syncing to ubuntu-dev-tools

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
Now that Oneiric is no longer under development, I don't see a need to
backport this functionality

** Changed in: natty-backports
   Status: New = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860506

Title:
  Backport native package syncing to ubuntu-dev-tools

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/natty-backports/+bug/860506/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 885511] [NEW] Backport widemargin 1.0.11-1 from Precise to Oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Iain Lane
Public bug reported:

I would like it.

** Affects: oneiric-backports
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885511

Title:
  Backport widemargin 1.0.11-1 from Precise to Oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/885511/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 865907] Re: Please backport tracker to Oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Micah Gersten
Thank you for requesting this backport. I've set this to incomplete
pending the upload of tracker 0.12.7-1 to precise.  Once that is
uploaded, you can reset this to New.  The requirement for a backport is
that it builds, installs, and runs in the targeted release.  Please let
us know if this is true with the new version (0.12.7-1).  Also, there is
a reverse dependency in oneiric for bognor-regis.  Please let us know if
this application also will still install and run with the new version of
tracker.  If you complete all this testing as well, please set the bug
to Confirmed.

** Changed in: oneiric-backports
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865907

Title:
  Please backport tracker to Oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/865907/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 885511] Re: Backport widemargin 1.0.11-1 from Precise to Oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Iain Lane
** Changed in: oneiric-backports
   Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885511

Title:
  Backport widemargin 1.0.11-1 from Precise to Oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/885511/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 775204] Re: Please Backport Firefox 4

2011-11-02 Thread Micah Gersten
Thank you for requesting this backport.  Firefox will soon be updated in
Lucid to the rapid release version through the main archive.  In the
mean time, you can get the latest stable release at ppa:mozillateam
/firefox-stable.  Therefore, I am marking this bug invalid.

** Changed in: lucid-backports
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775204

Title:
  Please Backport Firefox 4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/775204/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 885511] Re: Backport widemargin 1.0.11-1 from Precise to Oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Iain Lane
FTBFS :(

** Changed in: oneiric-backports
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Iain Lane (laney)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885511

Title:
  Backport widemargin 1.0.11-1 from Precise to Oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/885511/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 885511] Re: Backport widemargin 1.0.11-1 from Precise to Oneiric

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
I attempted a test build of widemargin and it failed to build (build log
attached).

widemargin has also failed to build in Precise
(https://launchpadlibrarian.net/83291614/buildlog_ubuntu-
precise-i386.widemargin_1.0.11-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz).

I'm going to mark this bug as Incomplete; if the package is fixed in
Precise, feel free to change the bug status back to New.

** Attachment added: widemargin_1.0.11-1~oneiric1_source.build
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/885511/+attachment/2583714/+files/widemargin_1.0.11-1%7Eoneiric1_source.build

** Changed in: oneiric-backports
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885511

Title:
  Backport widemargin 1.0.11-1 from Precise to Oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/885511/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 773236] Re: Please add ClamAV v0.97

2011-11-02 Thread Micah Gersten
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 848117 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848117

This has already been fixed from bug #848117.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 848117
   Backport clamav 0.97.2 from natty-updates to hardy, lucid, and maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773236

Title:
  Please add ClamAV v0.97

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/773236/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 784409] Re: cmake natty-backport needed to fix ccache compatibility

2011-11-02 Thread Evan Broder
Backports are intended to be used for introducing new features, not
fixing bugs. For fixing bugs, please use the Stable Release Update
process (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates)

** Changed in: natty-backports
   Status: New = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784409

Title:
  cmake natty-backport needed to fix ccache compatibility

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/natty-backports/+bug/784409/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 734186] Re: please backport clamav (at least 0.97)

2011-11-02 Thread Micah Gersten
This has already been fixed from bug #848117.

** Changed in: lucid-backports
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734186

Title:
  please backport clamav (at least 0.97)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/734186/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 795602] Re: Please SRU aptitude 0.6.3-3.2

2011-11-02 Thread Micah Gersten
Moving to ubuntu/aptitude

** Project changed: lucid-backports = aptitude (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795602

Title:
  Please SRU aptitude 0.6.3-3.2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/795602/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 671436] Re: Lucid and maverick version of Youtube-dl no longer work

2011-11-02 Thread Micah Gersten
Since this will be fixed in the main archive, I'm marking the backports
task invalid.

** Changed in: lucid-backports
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671436

Title:
  Lucid and maverick version of Youtube-dl no longer work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/671436/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 671436] Re: Lucid and maverick version of Youtube-dl no longer work

2011-11-02 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Oh, will it?  I'm not seeing much activity, just everybody closing tasks
left and right, but no real fixes.  That's pretty frustrating.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671436

Title:
  Lucid and maverick version of Youtube-dl no longer work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/671436/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 671436] Re: Lucid and maverick version of Youtube-dl no longer work

2011-11-02 Thread Rolf Leggewie
** Changed in: youtube-dl (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: youtube-dl (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: New = Triaged

** Changed in: youtube-dl (Ubuntu Maverick)
   Status: New = Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671436

Title:
  Lucid and maverick version of Youtube-dl no longer work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/671436/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 681892] Re: Need the netbeans backport to Lucid

2011-11-02 Thread Micah Gersten
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 602113 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602113

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 602113
   Please Backport NetBeans 6.9

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681892

Title:
  Need the netbeans backport to Lucid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/681892/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 701421] Re: Please backport yaml-mode 0.0.6-1 to lucid

2011-11-02 Thread Micah Gersten
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 533549 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533549

Marking this as a dupe of bug 533549 since I just uploaded a fix to
proposed.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 533549
   ln: creating symbolic link `./yaml-mode.el': File exists

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701421

Title:
  Please backport yaml-mode 0.0.6-1 to lucid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/701421/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports