[Bug 1968076] Re: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware

2022-10-05 Thread Dan Streetman
teward were you going to sponsor this?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968076

Title:
  [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmctl/+bug/1968076/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1983415] Re: [BPO] limnoria 2022.6.23-1 to jammy

2022-10-05 Thread Dan Streetman
this is done, with a newer version:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/limnoria/2022.9.20-1~bpo22.04.1

** Changed in: limnoria (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983415

Title:
  [BPO] limnoria 2022.6.23-1 to jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/limnoria/+bug/1983415/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: charter/policies

2022-10-05 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hello hello,

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:26:17AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Charter

I still find weird that this document doesn't include a provision that
requires the TB to ACK any change to it, but I understand that they
don't want it, so meh…

The document states that the team chair will be "approved" (? should
this be "appointed" instead?) with a process specified in the Policies
page, but I can't seem to see a paragraph describing that.  TBH, I would
just list it in Charter §5.3 instead, just saying "The chair shall be
elected with a majority vote within the current team members; the
current chair has a casting vote" or something similarly simple.  This
is so to avoid another possibly useless cross-document reference.

> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Policies

Can we drop the possibility of people joining the team with just a IRC
meeting agenda item?  I really want a full email with link to LP
profile, etc... else my mind really can't work on it.

The voting doesn't seem to have any provision for a casting vote? (which
"obviously" should be in the hands of the team chair (which… in case the
meeting chair is a different person, the casting vote is still in hands
of the team chair, hopefully it's obvious).



These details are the only points I have to make on the two documents.

Thank you for working on them, and sorry it took me forever to read
through them -.-

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports