[Bug 116709] Re: Backport of rhythmbox 0.10.90
0.11.0 is an unstable release, so this won't be backported officially. -- Backport of rhythmbox 0.10.90 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 68158] Re: Firefox 2.0
May I remind you of the Code of Conduct - http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct, specifically the "Be respectful" part. Arguements such as this should be kept to the forums, not bug reports. Nothing is forcing you to use Ubuntu, if you don't like the fact that LTS doesn't mean new software, then don't use it. Of course if you really wanted this, you could build firefox 2.0 yourself with a different package name (firefox2). The only person who has the obigation to fix a "bug" is yourself - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html Following on from what Martin said, I notice that Breezy now has the 1.5 branch of Firefox, but that was for security reasons. To be honest, Firefox 2.0 isn't much upon 1.5 anyway. -- Firefox 2.0 https://launchpad.net/bugs/68158 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 68908] Re: New version available
I did a compile of this on edgy AMD64, it required building sdlperl from Debian unstable. I got the source from MoM. Other from that, it works fine. I may attach a debdiff later. -- New version available https://launchpad.net/bugs/68908 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 52051] Re: Ouodlibet 0.21.1
Can't be backported until it is in Edgy. ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- Ouodlibet 0.21.1 https://launchpad.net/bugs/52051 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 51631] Re: Please backport OpenOffice 2.0.3 to Dapper
This is not a security issue, as the security fix was backported to 2.0.2 - openoffice.org (2.0.2-2ubuntu12.1) dapper-security; urgency=low * Add patch to fix a potential buffer overflow in the xml to utf-8 converter. CVE-2006-3117. * Add patch from upstream to fix macro handling security bug; it was possible to embed macros in documents without OOo seeing them and executing them without any user interaction. CVE-2006-2198. * Add patch from upstream to disable Java applets feature because it's possible to write Java applets breaking out of the sandbox. CVE-2006-2199. -- Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 6 Jul 2006 10:11:34 + -- Please backport OpenOffice 2.0.3 to Dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/51631 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 60072] Re: Acrobat Reader v7.0.8 *Portuguese*
7.0.8 is not in Edgy, but bug #54284 is the request for it in Edgy. -- Acrobat Reader v7.0.8 *Portuguese* https://launchpad.net/bugs/60072 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 58885] Re: calendar uses wrong timezone
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 58137 *** That's alright, I thought I heard of this bug before. ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected -- calendar uses wrong timezone https://launchpad.net/bugs/58885 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 52539] Re: backport vim 7 to dapper
** Bug 58814 has been marked a duplicate of this bug -- backport vim 7 to dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/52539 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 58814] Re: can we please have vim v7 as it's got full Ruby support?
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 52539 *** Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 52539 backport vim 7 to dapper ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected -- can we please have vim v7 as it's got full Ruby support? https://launchpad.net/bugs/58814 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 51631] Re: Please backport OpenOffice 2.0.3 to Dapper
2.0.3 is in Dapper Proposed - https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/dapper/+source/openoffice.org ** This bug is no longer flagged as a security issue -- Please backport OpenOffice 2.0.3 to Dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/51631 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 51348] Re: bittorrent 4
4 is not in Edgy yet. ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- bittorrent 4 https://launchpad.net/bugs/51348 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 51631] Re: Please backport OpenOffice 2.0.3 to Dapper
2.0.3 is now in Edgy. -- Please backport OpenOffice 2.0.3 to Dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/51631 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 52050] Re: gaim 2.0 beta 3
I don't think having beta software in a relatively stable distribution such as Dapper is a good idea. Once it becomes 2.0, mabye it could be backported (provided that is before Edgy is released). -- gaim 2.0 beta 3 https://launchpad.net/bugs/52050 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 52051] Re: Ouodlibet 0.21.1
Sorry, it is in Edgy. ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Needs Info => Confirmed -- Ouodlibet 0.21.1 https://launchpad.net/bugs/52051 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 50465] Re: kopete 0.12
** Bug 51205 has been marked a duplicate of this bug -- kopete 0.12 https://launchpad.net/bugs/50465 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 51205] Re: Please Backport Kopete 0.12
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 50465 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 50465 kopete 0.12 -- Please Backport Kopete 0.12 https://launchpad.net/bugs/51205 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 51350] Re: ScummVM 0.9
Not in Edgy yet ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- ScummVM 0.9 https://launchpad.net/bugs/51350 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 48951] Re: KTechlab
A backport has to be somthing that is in the edgy repository, so this is impossible just now anyway. -- KTechlab https://launchpad.net/bugs/48951 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 48963] Re: Req: OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.0.3 for Dapper
I think that this would be too large a change for a backport. -- Req: OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.0.3 for Dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/48963 -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
