[Bug 2065491] Re: [BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates

2024-07-12 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Changed in: far2l (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065491

Title:
  [BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/far2l/+bug/2065491/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2071361] Re: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy

2024-06-27 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
just remember that in Debian alternative build-depends are count *only*
in backports, meaning that the first alternative should be what's in
actual use in sid at the time.

I recommend you do have a deeper look at qtbase5-dev, as you said it's
very odd for it to not work in xca's case.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071361

Title:
  [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xca/+bug/2071361/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2071361] Re: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy

2024-06-27 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
FWIW, this is the change that Thomas mentions:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xca/-/commit/bbce8d50361bd0593ba4be88c3442fcc0527a400

I'm a bit confused: why are you referencing an explicit library package
in build-dep instead of using a -dev package (in this case,
qtbase5-dev)?

In any case, go ahead and upload to the queue.

** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed

** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071361

Title:
  [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xca/+bug/2071361/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2071361] Re: [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy

2024-06-27 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Changed in: xca (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071361

Title:
  [BPO] xca 2.6.0-1 to noble, jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xca/+bug/2071361/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2067261] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.6.7 for jammy

2024-05-27 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
approved, thank you!

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067261

Title:
  [BPO] libreoffice 7.6.7 for jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2067261/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2065359] Re: [BPO] lsp-plugins/1.2.15-2 from ocular to noble

2024-05-11 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Thank you for your contribution!

** Changed in: lsp-plugins (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065359

Title:
  [BPO] lsp-plugins/1.2.15-2 from ocular to noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsp-plugins/+bug/2065359/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2065491] Re: [BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates

2024-05-11 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Changed in: far2l (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065491

Title:
  [BPO] far2l/2.6.0~beta+ds-1ubuntu0.1 from noble-updates

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/far2l/+bug/2065491/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2008583] Re: VMware nested under KVM stopped working on 5.19 kernel on Ryzen: Invalid VMCB.

2024-04-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
hwe is not handled by the backports team, so I'm unsubscribing us.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2008583

Title:
   VMware nested under KVM stopped working on 5.19 kernel on Ryzen:
  Invalid VMCB.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2008583/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2062140] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.6.6 for jammy

2024-04-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Accepted, thank you!

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062140

Title:
  [BPO] libreoffice 7.6.6 for jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2062140/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2052555] Re: [BPO] git-credential-oauth/0.11.0-1 from noble

2024-02-08 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Note that the Ubuntu backports team does not provide prepare backports
themselves, so you'd need to find some Ubuntu Developer willing to do
that.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports

** Changed in: git-credential-oauth (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Also affects: git-credential-oauth (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: git-credential-oauth (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052555

Title:
  [BPO] git-credential-oauth/0.11.0-1 from noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/git-credential-oauth/+bug/2052555/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2049779] Re: [BPO] carla/2.5.8-0ubuntu1 from noble

2024-02-08 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
approved, thank you

** Changed in: carla (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049779

Title:
  [BPO] carla/2.5.8-0ubuntu1 from noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/carla/+bug/2049779/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


today's meeting

2023-10-25 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Today we are scheduled to have a meeting in less than 2 hours from now.

I don't have any update concerning the current items nor my own TODOs
(sorry about this!), and I don't think we have any pressing issue/case
we need to discuss.
I think it would be fine to just skip this meeting and jump on the next
one.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2039150] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.7 for jammy

2023-10-18 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
thank you, approved!

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039150

Title:
  [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.7 for jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2039150/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2039150] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.7 for jammy

2023-10-13 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
@BPO team: did we ever decide on whether, for the sake of not breaking
upgrades, we care about -proposed vs -updates?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039150

Title:
  [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.7 for jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2039150/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2033645] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy

2023-09-27 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
this has now been published.

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033645

Title:
  [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2033645/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2033645] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy

2023-09-07 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Right.  Just upload and ping the bug once that's through!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033645

Title:
  [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2033645/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2033645] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy

2023-09-07 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Of course, this is fine.

I don't see libreoffice in the jammy queue, so feel free to upload :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033645

Title:
  [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.6 for jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2033645/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: next meeting

2023-09-04 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hello!

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 03:33:48PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> Sorry I wasn't able to make the last meeting date; I'm looking at when
> to schedule the next meeting, and since mapreri will be away at
> Debconf soon, and not available until late Sept (per IRC comments)

Quite amusingly, I'm more available during DebConf (i.e., starting
yesterday) than before (when I was doing some traveling around India)!

> was thinking of scheduling the next meeting for Wed Sept 27. I know
> that's a big gap between meetings but I don't think we have anything
> pressing that we need a meeting for.
> 
> Does that date work for everyone?

27th is good for me.  And I agree we don't have anything pressing to
discuss.
I'll actually be travelling elsewhere then, but I should be able to make
it without any problem.

-- 
regards,
        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2027961] Re: [BPO] rednotebook/2.29.6+ds-2 from mantic

2023-09-03 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
approved, sorry it took so long.

** Changed in: rednotebook (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: rednotebook (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2027961

Title:
   [BPO] rednotebook/2.29.6+ds-2 from mantic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rednotebook/+bug/2027961/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2030302] Re: [BPO] carla/2.5.6-0ubuntu1 from mantic

2023-09-03 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
approved, thank you for the update!

** Changed in: carla (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2030302

Title:
  [BPO] carla/2.5.6-0ubuntu1 from mantic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/carla/+bug/2030302/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2030259] Re: [BPO] Backport mozc from lunar to jammy

2023-09-03 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
I don't feel strongly against this, so I'm accepting this.

It is kind of out of line with what we normally like, however.

** Also affects: mozc (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: mozc (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: mozc (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2030259

Title:
  [BPO] Backport mozc from lunar to jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozc/+bug/2030259/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2029130] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.5 for jammy

2023-08-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
thank you for your work!

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029130

Title:
  [BPO] libreoffice 7.5.5 for jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2029130/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2012676] Re: [BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic

2023-06-07 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Right, well.. backports are not done to be compatible with the base
distribution, of course.  They have to be manually installed by the
system administrators knowing what they are doing exactly for this
reason.  But huge incompatibilities for sure make for a "negative
point".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012676

Title:
  [BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2012676/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2012676] Re: [BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic

2023-06-07 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hello Nathan,

we had a couple of meetings in the Backports and we have some concerns
about this proposed update:

1) you haven't provided any debdiffs, nor it's clear who is going to prepare 
the backports and do the future maintenance, as you don't seem to be an active 
Ubuntu contributor
2) you'd like to do the bpo from kinetic, but doing so will break updates as 
jammy is not covered.  You'll need to either include a jammy bpo, or ignore 
kinetic and do the bpo from jammy, unless there are relevant changes later on.
3) I'm going to subscribe the ubuntu server team and I noticed that Andreas 
Hasenack subscribed himself already, as before approving such package I'd 
totally like to have their input
4) the bug #1812280 you mentioned is in a different source package, but either 
way, if it's relevant then it should be handled via SRU and not necessarily be 
considered while evaluating the benefits of backporting nfs-utils
5) I think I'd like to have the tests a little better defined than "tested the 
package manually in focal without any issues so far"

Thank you for your interest!

** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Incomplete

** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012676

Title:
  [BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2012676/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: New proposal for Ubuntu Backporters Team Charter

2023-06-07 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
So, hello TB!

Today we had a Backporters meeting, and indeed we don't have any
opposition to this latest proposal, thank you for the prods, and I'm
happy that this topic is finally coming to a close!

Please do email us a bit more "formally" once it's done, so that we have
a good authoritative reference to link to later on :)


I think following this ratification the next question would be: where is
a good place to collect them?  Personally I'm going to copy it under
our "wiki space" (and perhaps under launchpad as well?  It's short
enough…), but the final goal was for the TB to define a bunch of
these for all the other interesting teams too, so I wonder if you
already have something good in mind?


On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 04:45:35AM +0930, Alex Murray wrote:
> Hi backporters team,
> 
> The TB has still not received any response on the proposal to adopt
> Mattia's suggested Charter. As such, in today's TB meeting it was agreed
> that the TB would ratify this as the Charter for the Backporters team
> after Monday 12th June. Please let us know if you have objections to
> this proposal before that date.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alex
> 
> On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 18:30:12 +0930, Alex Murray wrote:
> 
> > Hey backporters team,
> >
> > Just wanted to see if anyone had any thoughts on this? The TB are keen
> > to move this forward and are just waiting on some kind of ACK from your
> > side.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-05-09 at 14:59:22 +0930, Alex Murray wrote:
> >
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> After the most recent Tech Board meeting, the TB agreed that the best
> >> way forward here would be to go with Mattia's proposal outlined below (I
> >> have reproduced it here):
> >>
> >>   * Maintain the Ubuntu "backports" pocket.
> >>   * Establish and manage an effective process and a set of policies to
> >> handle contributions to the "backports" pocket.
> >>   * Define a set of rules to handle the Backports Team memberships, its
> >> internal structure and members' responsbilities.
> >>
> >> Would the Backporters Team be willing to adopt this as their Charter?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Alex
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, 2023-03-01 at 16:22:13 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 11:03:02AM +1030, Alex Murray wrote:
> >>>> Just wondering if you had a chance to review my feedback? It would be
> >>>> great to try and make some progress here.
> >>>
> >>> We have a meeting later today, but I'll give you my own inputs.
> >>>
> >>> The tl;dr: I'm more in-line with Dan comments.
> >>>
> >>>> >>>  * Establish and manage an effective process to handle backport
> >>>> >>>requests based solely on their technical merit.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> I'm not sure this is correct, to handle requests *solely* on technical
> >>>> >> merit. For example, part of the backport process is the expectation
> >>>> >> that the backport requestor/uploader will remain responsible for
> >>>> >> further backports as needed; if an uploaded backport seems technically
> >>>> >> correct but the backports team does not believe the uploader would be
> >>>> >> responsible for further uploads, the backports team should be able to
> >>>> >> reject the upload on that basis.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Stating "solely on their technical merit" places undue restrictions on
> >>>> >> our team, I believe.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I feel it is perhaps a bit too onerous to expect that just because a
> >>>> > user contributes one backport that they then should be expected to keep
> >>>> > doing backports for that package - this is placing undue restrictions 
> >>>> > on
> >>>> > your possible contributors. Regardless though, I don't think the
> >>>> > backports team should be trying to guess whether someone is likely to
> >>>> > contribute further backports in the future - this leaves too much 
> >>>> > chance
> >>>> > for the team to ignore proposed backports on arbitrary grounds. As 
> >>>> > such,
> >>>> > this is the exact point of the statement "solely on their technical
> >>>> > 

[Bug 2012676] Re: [BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic

2023-06-07 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Also affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012676

Title:
  [BPO] nfs-utils/1:2.6.1-2ubuntu4 from kinetic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2012676/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2022875] Re: [BPO] carla/2.5.5-0ubuntu1 from mantic

2023-06-07 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
sure, approved :)

** Also affects: carla (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: carla (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Invalid

** Changed in: carla (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2022875

Title:
  [BPO] carla/2.5.5-0ubuntu1 from mantic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/carla/+bug/2022875/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2009944] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.4.6 for bionic, focal and jammy

2023-03-30 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009944

Title:
  [BPO] libreoffice 7.4.6 for bionic, focal and jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2009944/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2009944] Re: [BPO] libreoffice 7.4.6 for bionic, focal and jammy

2023-03-29 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Yes, it seems that René didn't follow the latest rules about epochs, and
used it to revent accidental uploads (multiple!) of 7.5 to unstable
instead of experimental.

The current policy states that in those cases he should have used the
+really notation, but I reckon he wouldn't have liked to release
bookworm with a +really in the version string of libreoffice…


(I'm leaving the approval to Dan since he is on this task already)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009944

Title:
  [BPO] libreoffice 7.4.6 for bionic, focal and jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2009944/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2012724] Re: [BPO] borgmatic 1.7.9-0ubuntu1 to jammy

2023-03-29 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
approved the jammy bpo.

I'm rejecting kinetic since that's out of policy (non-LTS target).
Please tell us if you have some special needs for kinetic.

** Changed in: borgmatic (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: borgmatic (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: borgmatic (Ubuntu Kinetic)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012724

Title:
  [BPO] borgmatic 1.7.9-0ubuntu1 to jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/borgmatic/+bug/2012724/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 2012945] Re: [BPO] studio-controls/2.3.9-0ubuntu2 from lunar

2023-03-29 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
good for me.

** Changed in: studio-controls (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012945

Title:
  [BPO] studio-controls/2.3.9-0ubuntu2 from lunar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/studio-controls/+bug/2012945/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: New proposal for Ubuntu Backporters Team Charter

2023-03-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hello Robie!

On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 05:21:10PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> I wonder if it's worth first discussing what the text would actually be
> used *for*, since your reply suggests to me that we might not have the
> same view on this here.

This seems to be the case indeed.

> I see the (my) proposed text as a point of reference between the
> backporters team and the rest of the project, but generally only for use
> to guide the backporters team in defining their own policies, procedures
> and documentation, cases where it was unclear what their
> responsibilities are, or in case of some kind of unhappiness

I think we are in complete agreement then.
Your description perfectly matches my definition as well.

To me, Charter and Polices are to be the actual rules that describe
how the team has to behave.
Indeed, team members needs to be aware of them, and so do those who
aspire to actually be part of the team.  But people who interact with
us (i.e. those contributing backported packages) really have no
business with these documents.

-- 
regards,
        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: New proposal for Ubuntu Backporters Team Charter

2023-03-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
et of rules to handle the Backports Team memberships, its
internal structure and members' responsabilities.

> > So I think we are starting to get to the crux of the difference in
> > viewpoints from the TB to the backporters team. Due to the past history
> > of some perceived dysfunction within the backporters team, I feel it is
> > important to try and set some more specific expectations for how the
> > newly rebooted team would function - particularly to an outsider wishing
> > to contribute.

The problem in my opinion is that also your (rbasak's) original proposal
is also "useless" for an aspiring contributor.  Also, what's
"contributor" here?  Somebody wanting to propose a backport update is
really not served by these documents (either Charter or Policies)...

> > This is not trying to constrain the efforts of those on
> > the team in any way, but more trying to set an expectation of quality
> > for all possible contributions, and to also give contributors confidence
> > that their submissions won't potentially be in vain. Overall, this is
> > really about trying to ensure the backports subcommunity is vibrant and
> > welcoming to encourage contributions, and not potentially perceived as a
> > gated group that is only accessible to the special few.

I don't think I look forward to any sort of "backports subcommunity", so
I'm afraid we might have some sort of disconnect here.

What I look forward is more people interested in backporting updates to
the packages they are (and keep being) interested in.  I don't imagine
these people forming any kind of submcommunity around backports, rather
those being mostly regular ubuntu develpers that have an extra interest.
Are we trying to assure these people?  I joined this team reboot because
in the past the team just died, nobody knew who was responsibile for
what, etc.  In my view, the best reassurance we can give to those
potential contributors, is being actually available to their enquiries
and requests.


Summing up my proposal:

  * Maintain the Ubuntu "backports" pocket.
  * Establish and manage an effective process and a set of policies to
handle contributions to the "backports" pocket.
  * Define a set of rules to handle the Backports Team memberships, its
internal structure and members' responsabilities.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1959115] Re: update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new backport process

2023-01-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
I just committed 0f3d2fed2a4ed67b90b5d49aab25ca2bda5d9d37 updating
requestbackport.

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959115

Title:
  update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according
  to new backport process

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1959115/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1998834] Re: [BPO] memtest86+/6.01-1 to Jammy

2023-01-14 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
@Fantu: please see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports#Finding_a_Sponsor for the
details regarding sponsorship.

I'm subscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors for now and see if somebody picks it
up, or you might want to check with your usual ubuntu sponsor, if you
have one.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998834

Title:
  [BPO] memtest86+/6.01-1 to Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1998834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1997189] Re: [BPO] elfutils/0.188-1 from Lunar

2022-12-04 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
accepted.

** Changed in: elfutils (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997189

Title:
   [BPO] elfutils/0.188-1 from Lunar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/1997189/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1998624] Re: [BPO] python-pyelftools/0.29-1 from Kinetic

2022-12-04 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
ah, you already uploaded, accepted.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998624

Title:
  [BPO] python-pyelftools/0.29-1 from Kinetic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pyelftools/+bug/1998624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1998624] Re: [BPO] python-pyelftools/0.29-1 from Kinetic

2022-12-04 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
If this is a plain backport without any change, feel free to go ahead.

** Changed in: python-pyelftools (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: python-pyelftools (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998624

Title:
  [BPO] python-pyelftools/0.29-1 from Kinetic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pyelftools/+bug/1998624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1968076] Re: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware

2022-11-30 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Changed in: ipmctl (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968076

Title:
  [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmctl/+bug/1968076/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1992163] Re: [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy

2022-11-30 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
We have discussed this in the last Backporters meeting, and we decided
not to accept this, as a simple performance bug, which is not what the
backport pocket is intended for (that's more about new features).

** Also affects: man-db (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

** Changed in: man-db (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992163

Title:
  [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1992163/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1992163] Re: [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy

2022-10-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
@teward: look at https://gitlab.com/cjwatson/man-
db/-/merge_requests/2/diffs - it's quite the big change to defend for a
SRU.  or, rather, quite deep into the code.

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
   * Users of man-db/2.9.1-1 in focal are sometimes facing
  unresponsiveness when man-db is called from an `apt upgrade` or `apt
  install` command (the man-db command freezes).
  
  [Scope]
  
   * Backport from jammy man-db/2.10.2-1
  
   * Backport to focal
  
  [Other Info]
  
-  * man-db >= 2.10.0-2 fixes the behavior described above as per
- LP#1858777 ("Fix Released")
+  * man-db >= 2.10.0-2 fixes the behavior described above as per LP:
+ #1858777 ("Fix Released")

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992163

Title:
  [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1992163/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: [Bug 1992163] Re: [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy

2022-10-07 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
From what I read (and remember), the command doesn't freeze but just takes
a bit long.

Honestly I don't really consider such issue worth a backport, and it's not
really bringing any new feature to the table (at least, you are not
describing anything).

I was thinking that perhaps this could be done as part of an SRU, but the
relevant patch is just huge, so probably not either...


Other BPO team members: what do you think?

On Fri, 7 Oct 2022, 6:10 pm Jorge Rodríguez, <1992...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> Backported debs in:
> https://launchpad.net/~jrodrigu/+archive/ubuntu/bpo/+packages
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
> Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992163
>
> Title:
>   [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1992163/+subscriptions
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992163

Title:
  [BPO] man-db/2.10.2-1 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/man-db/+bug/1992163/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: charter/policies

2022-10-05 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hello hello,

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:26:17AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Charter

I still find weird that this document doesn't include a provision that
requires the TB to ACK any change to it, but I understand that they
don't want it, so meh…

The document states that the team chair will be "approved" (? should
this be "appointed" instead?) with a process specified in the Policies
page, but I can't seem to see a paragraph describing that.  TBH, I would
just list it in Charter §5.3 instead, just saying "The chair shall be
elected with a majority vote within the current team members; the
current chair has a casting vote" or something similarly simple.  This
is so to avoid another possibly useless cross-document reference.

> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Policies

Can we drop the possibility of people joining the team with just a IRC
meeting agenda item?  I really want a full email with link to LP
profile, etc... else my mind really can't work on it.

The voting doesn't seem to have any provision for a casting vote? (which
"obviously" should be in the hands of the team chair (which… in case the
meeting chair is a different person, the casting vote is still in hands
of the team chair, hopefully it's obvious).



These details are the only points I have to make on the two documents.

Thank you for working on them, and sorry it took me forever to read
through them -.-

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1987356] Re: [BPO] elfutils/0.187-1 from Kinetic

2022-08-31 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Also affects: elfutils (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: elfutils (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987356

Title:
  [BPO] elfutils/0.187-1 from Kinetic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/+bug/1987356/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1983414] Re: [BPO] dh-python 5.20220403 to focal

2022-08-03 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Also affects: dh-python (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: dh-python (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983414

Title:
  [BPO] dh-python 5.20220403 to focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-python/+bug/1983414/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1983415] Re: [BPO] limnoria 2022.6.23-1 to jammy

2022-08-03 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
sure, I assume it's a no-change rebuild, if so then go ahead with an
upload :)

** Also affects: limnoria (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: limnoria (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983415

Title:
  [BPO] limnoria 2022.6.23-1 to jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/limnoria/+bug/1983415/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: Not able to attend backporters meeting today

2022-07-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 02:02:06PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> How about either Aug 3 at 1500 UTC,

This is great for me, yes.

> or we can just skip this month and plan for Aug 10 at 1600 UTC?

Between the 6th and the 22nd Aug I will be mostly offline, so I won't be
available.

-- 
regards,
    Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: Not able to attend backporters meeting today

2022-07-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:28:17AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 12:50 PM Mattia Rizzolo  wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:06:10AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > > very sorry for the late notice, but I can't make the backporters
> > > meeting today, unfortunately.
> >
> > We figured on IRC that we'd be posponing then.  What about the 27th same
> > time slot for you?  It's fine for us.
> 
> Could we do Aug 3, same time slot?

Aug 3 same slot I have also another meeting going (that runs 1600-1700
UTC), so I would be able to attend properly.

But if you pick any different time (the rest of the day is still open)
it would be fine by me.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: Not able to attend backporters meeting today

2022-07-13 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:06:10AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> very sorry for the late notice, but I can't make the backporters
> meeting today, unfortunately.

We figured on IRC that we'd be posponing then.  What about the 27th same
time slot for you?  It's fine for us.


BTW, the only thing I would have like to report this meeting is that I
uploaded a bunch of debhelper packages to bpo, up for review if you have
some time (there is a tracking bug).

-- 
regards,
    Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1980579] Re: [BPO] devscripts/2.22.1ubuntu1 from jammy

2022-07-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
bionic is not really feasible anymore, since newer devscripts requires
dpkg-dev (>= 1.19.1) and libgitlab-api-v4-perl (and libfile-dirlist-
perl).  I haven't investigated whether it's easy to drop those
dependencies, but I'd propose to just forget about bionic for
devscripts' backports.

** Changed in: devscripts (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: In Progress => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980579

Title:
  [BPO] devscripts/2.22.1ubuntu1 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devscripts/+bug/1980579/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1980579] Re: [BPO] devscripts/2.22.1ubuntu1 from jammy

2022-07-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
for focal this is a plain backport with no change besides a changelog
entry, and I've just uploaded it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980579

Title:
  [BPO] devscripts/2.22.1ubuntu1 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devscripts/+bug/1980579/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1980580] Re: [BPO] libfile-dirlist-perl/0.05-2 from jammy

2022-07-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** No longer affects: libfile-dirlist-perl (Ubuntu Bionic)

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
-  * This is a new dependency of devscripts/2.20.5, and since we are
+  * This is a new dependency of devscripts/2.20.5, and since we are
  backporting a newer version of it, it's nicer to have it than reverting
  the change that introduced the dependency.
  
  [Scope]
  
-  * from jammy v 0.05-2.
+  * from jammy v 0.05-2.
  
-  * to focal and bionic.
+  * to focal.
  
  [Other Info]
-  
-  * This is a new package that is not available in either focal nor bionic
-  * It's a very lightweight perl module, with no foreseeable maintenance 
overhead.
+ 
+  * This is a new package that is not available in focal
+  * It's a very lightweight perl module, with no foreseeable maintenance 
overhead.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980580

Title:
  [BPO] libfile-dirlist-perl/0.05-2 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfile-dirlist-perl/+bug/1980580/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1980580] Re: [BPO] libfile-dirlist-perl/0.05-2 from jammy

2022-07-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
focal uploaded.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980580

Title:
  [BPO] libfile-dirlist-perl/0.05-2 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfile-dirlist-perl/+bug/1980580/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1962614] Re: [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4 from Jammy to Focal

2022-06-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
thank you for your contribution, and sorry it took so long for handling
this request!

** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962614

Title:
  [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4  from Jammy to Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1962614/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1968076] Re: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware

2022-06-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
(in fact, this is not really different than debian: also debian
backports require the proposed version to be available in the "next
stable", to assure the upgrade path)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968076

Title:
  [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmctl/+bug/1968076/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

2022-06-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
I think, looking at the list of packages currently in the backports
pockets, nothing need rebuilding for that bug, right?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758

Title:
  [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1965800] Re: [BPO] debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)

2022-06-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
uploads approved.

** Changed in: debugedit (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800

Title:
  [BPO] debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package
  building (missing dependency)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

2022-06-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Thank you Dan!

I accepted both uploads!

** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758

Title:
  [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


apologizes for the upcoming meeting

2022-05-30 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi,

this wednesday june 1st I'll be coming back from
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/de/2022/DebianReunionHamburg - at
the time of the meeting I'll be traveling on land but I won't be able to
join IRC.

I'd like to propose to reschedule the meeting to June 15th, same time.
On June 8th I have another meeting planned that overlaps, so I wouldn't
be able to match that; furthermore I already know that I wouldn't be
able to attend on June 29th either, so shifting would likely match
better my calender (I'm selfish here!) ;)

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1962614] Re: [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4 from Jammy to Focal

2022-05-04 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi,

in the last backporters team meeting we decided to approve this backport.
We'd still like to see some of those bugs you mentioned properly fixed in focal 
itself (as an SRU), but we recognize that doing so would be a non-trivial 
amount of work and as such probably not a good use of your time since this 
proposed backport has good reasons to exist on its own.

As such, please feel free to continue with the process (send a debdiff
against the package in jammy and upload).

** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962614

Title:
  [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4  from Jammy to Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1962614/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1968076] Re: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware

2022-04-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
then you should prepare the change (likely in the form of a debdiff
against what's currently in jammy, or an upload to a ppa) and attach it
here, then subscribe the ~ubuntu-sponsors team.

(also note that we expect your backports to have been tested in the
target release, I'll assume you've done that)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968076

Title:
  [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmctl/+bug/1968076/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1968076] Re: [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware

2022-04-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Do you have a sponsor lined up for this?  The backporters team by
themselves don't do it.

** Also affects: ipmctl (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ipmctl (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968076

Title:
  [BPO] ipmctl with support for CPS hardware

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmctl/+bug/1968076/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1967003] Re: [BPO] obfs4proxy/0.0.13-1 from jammy

2022-04-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
The backports team does not prepare nor sponsor uploads to backports,
only review them.  You should find somebody interested in doing the
work, testing it, and maintain it, as well as a sponsor for it.

** Also affects: obfs4proxy (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: obfs4proxy (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Changed in: obfs4proxy (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967003

Title:
  [BPO] obfs4proxy/0.0.13-1 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obfs4proxy/+bug/1967003/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1963829] Re: [BPO] primecount/7.2+ds-6 from jammy

2022-04-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
We would be fine with this backport, but I don't see it in the queue.

Also, the text is not mentioning anything about what testing has been
done to it, which we expect.

Please note that we (backports team) do *not* sponsor backports, so you
should find a sponsor for it yourself.

** Also affects: primecount (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: primecount (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: primecount (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963829

Title:
  [BPO] primecount/7.2+ds-6 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/primecount/+bug/1963829/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: [Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)

2022-03-22 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
So it would need 2 addition to the i386 whitelist.

Feel free to bring an archive administrator in the loop, I think it's only
them who have the power to do that (if we want to go through that route).
Except that I just realized that rpm (and debugedit) in focal are in
universe.  So it would also need a MIR, which is definitely not happening
for a stable release.
I also guess that's the reason debugedit was split off rpm.

So I suppose we either need to check whether backporting debugedit would
make it build on i386, or revert that change in debhelper.


On Tue, 22 Mar 2022, 1:31 pm David Ward, <1965...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:

> I am able to build src:rpm for focal i386 using pbuilder, as long as
> p7zip-full:i386 is built first.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
> Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800
>
> Title:
>   debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building
>   (missing dependency)
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800/+subscriptions
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800

Title:
  debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building
  (missing dependency)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1965800] Re: debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building (missing dependency)

2022-03-22 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
I think we have three choices here:

1. revert Matthias' change from debhelper/13.3.4ubuntu1 (2021-03-19) that make 
use of debugedit (honestly I don't even understand *why* he did that)
2. backport debugedit too (honestly I don't remember if that would be enough to 
make it build on i386, however, or it also needs an addition to the i386 
whitelist)
3. get the archive admins to add src:rpm in the i386 whitelist, and rebuild it 
(if that's enough to make it build and doesn't require more).

I'd be for option 1 here.

comments welcome.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965800

Title:
  debhelper in focal-backports not usable for i386 package building
  (missing dependency)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965800/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1965855] Re: p7zip source package needs "Multiarch: foreign" in debian/control

2022-03-22 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
that's hardly the reason that debhelper/focal-backports is uninstallable
on i386.

Remember that Multi-Arch fields are used for multi-arch installations,
that are irrelevant for things like native builds, and are totally
unused in buildds and such.

** Changed in: p7zip (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965855

Title:
  p7zip source package needs "Multiarch: foreign" in debian/control

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p7zip/+bug/1965855/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

2022-03-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
@teward: I'm pretty sure that bug only affects -backports: according to
the debian bug the commit introducing it is 6067bc2f, which was first
available in debhelper 13.4, which is only in jammy and -backports.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758

Title:
  [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal

2022-03-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
tbf, I don't think this is actually *urgent* and can really just stay
there for another week.

** Summary changed:

- [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal
+ [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758

Title:
  [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1965758] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal

2022-03-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Oh, that's probably a good reason to update the backport indeed, that
I've been procrastinating.

Unfortunately at this time I'm quite busy so I wouldn't be able to do it
before next Monday at the earliest.  Personally I'm fine if somebody
else take it and I'll later review the diff; I don't expect anything
"interesting" in this task either.

** Also affects: debhelper (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: debhelper (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: debhelper (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965758

Title:
  [BPO] debhelper/13.6ubuntu1 from jammy to bionic, focal, impish

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1965758/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: updated charter and policies wiki pages

2022-03-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
(thanks for the prod on IRC)

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 04:33:05PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> so, if i'm being totally pedantic, the exact version of the charter
> and policies is:
> 
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Charter?action=recall=5
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Policies?action=recall=6
> 
> let me know if either of you have any comments or concerns, otherwise
> if the charter looks ok to you, we can send it up to the TB sometime
> next week.

I'm good with those 2 versions, thank you.

-- 
regards,
        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1951601] Re: [BPO] simplestreams/0.1.0-48-gb936edd4-0ubuntu1 from Jammy to bionic, focal

2022-03-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Summary changed:

- [BPO] backport 0.1.0-48-gb936edd4-0ubuntu1 to bionic, focal
+ [BPO] simplestreams/0.1.0-48-gb936edd4-0ubuntu1 from Jammy to bionic, focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951601

Title:
  [BPO] simplestreams/0.1.0-48-gb936edd4-0ubuntu1 from Jammy to bionic,
  focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simplestreams/+bug/1951601/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: Team charter

2022-03-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 04:53:27PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > * you say that the chair can be replaced at any time, but I propose that
> >   such change require a supermajority (3/4th of the team) and since the
> >   team is owned by the TB, that also needs to be accepted by them
> 
> agreed on requiring TB approval - but I'm not sure about requiring a
> supermajority of votes?
> 
> I feel like if a majority of team members aren't happy with the chair,
> then the chair probably should be replaced, no? And the TB will have
> final approval to keep or allow replacement of the chair.

For taking down the current chair, yes simple majority.  It just felt
more normal to me that the election of the one would require a stronger
majority than that, but if both of you don't think so, thats fine by me.

> > * you haven't specified *who* can apply.  I recommend to require MOTUs.
> 
> i think we should move the specific membership requirements and
> process into simple team policies, don't you? there is the requirement
> in the charter for the team to document membership requirements and
> application process in our public docs.

Not really, I think the set of membership requirements (at least when it
comes to the really strict requirements such as being an active dev
already) should be in the formal charter.

Also a formal charter just saying "for more rules look at this
less-serious document" just sounds odd to me.

If the only requirement we are writing down is 1) already member of a
team; 2) the current bpo team votes; then there is no need for an extra
document at all.

> re: MOTU, i agree, but also ~sru-developers I suggest?

I'll admit that I've always found the concept of ~ubuntu-sru-developers
odd, I don't really get what's the point of it myself; I'd think
somebody interested in keeping up the stable releases should also
activily follow the dev releases.. plus the fact that looking at it it
feels (to me) a canonical-forced team just so that their employees can
bypass the sponsorship workflow :\

Having said all that, I still don't think it makes sense: I could accept
having that team be able to upload into the queue (I suspect their
uploads currently would just be rejected?), but like (I… think) they
can't be part of the ~ubuntu-sru team themeselves so to approve
them; that ought to require some kind of higher level in my mind.

TBH I already feel odd myself being able to deal with packages in main
while being only a MOTU for now


> > * what's with the "may 1st" thing about the chair?  especially if
> >   somebody is "promoted" to chair, that would make for an awkward
> >   situation, so what's the reason behind that?
> > * so you think we should vote to extend everybody's membership?  That
> >   sounds like too much work, wouldn't it?  also I don't really see a
> >   need for it.  And if you think it'd be useful, then everybody should
> >   expire the same date so that we can just hold one yearly meeting
> >   renewing (or not) everybody at once.
> 
> yeah all this isn't needed for our team - i was thinking more of
> issues with some other teams.

Alright, so… you dropped all changes related to expiry.

I think something should stay.  Like make the members expire yearly and
having them to renew themeselves.

FTR, I consider the current "Any team member may call for a public vote
to remove any other team member." fine as a way to remove inactive
people from the board.  We can then police ourseleves whenever we feel
like the inactivity of somebody is causing trouble.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: Team charter

2022-03-07 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 04:34:56PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
> I have a draft of my proposed team charter here
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports/Charter

Great, thank you!

> Any feedback is welcome, on this list and/or at the team mtg next week.

Few comments:
* you talk about votes all over, but I think it's important to specify
  somewhere that you are expecting a "simple majority vote" or so (which
  is what 7.1.11 means, effectively)
* you say that the chair can be replaced at any time, but I propose that
  such change require a supermajority (3/4th of the team) and since the
  team is owned by the TB, that also needs to be accepted by them
* require that the team has at least a quarterly meeting (despite
  currently being fortnight)
* you haven't specified *who* can apply.  I recommend to require MOTUs.
* what's with the "may 1st" thing about the chair?  especially if
  somebody is "promoted" to chair, that would make for an awkward
  situation, so what's the reason behind that?
* so you think we should vote to extend everybody's membership?  That
  sounds like too much work, wouldn't it?  also I don't really see a
  need for it.  And if you think it'd be useful, then everybody should
  expire the same date so that we can just hold one yearly meeting
  renewing (or not) everybody at once.
* 7.1.5 "at the chair’s discretion" - here I suppose you are referring
  to the meeting chair, not the team chair, right?  (which could be
  different)


overall if feels more complicated than it needs to be, but effectively
it's what we've been doing, so it should be fine.


-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1962614] Re: [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4 from Jammy to Focal

2022-03-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Changed in: memtest86+ (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962614

Title:
  [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4  from Jammy to Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memtest86+/+bug/1962614/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1962743] Re: [BPO] freeipmi/1.6.9-2 from Jammy to Focal

2022-03-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Also affects: freeipmi (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: freeipmi (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743

Title:
  [BPO] freeipmi/1.6.9-2 from Jammy to Focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeipmi/+bug/1962743/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: [Bug 1962614] [NEW] [BPO] memtest86+/5.31b+dfsg-4 from Jammy to Focal

2022-03-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
I'm afraid I'll have to say no to versions that have the goal or fixing
crashes of freezes, as backports is not the pocket to fix those.

Please do an SRU to fix those bugs instead.

On Tue, 1 Mar 2022, 8:48 pm Launchpad Bug Tracker, <
1962...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:

> You have been subscribed to a public bug by Fantu (fantonifabio):
>
> [Impact]
>
>  * Version in Focal is broken (freeze or crash) on major of cases based
> on what I saw
>
> [Scope]
>
>  * List the Ubuntu release you will backport from, and the specific
> package version: 5.31b+dfsg-4  from Jammy
>
>  * List the Ubuntu release(s) you will backport to: Focal
>
> [Other Info]
>
> For now salsa git (where is hosted debian packaging) is down:
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/memtest86plus
> when will return available I'll prepare a focal-backports branch
>
>
> Changelog entries since current Focal version:
>
> memtest86+ (5.31b+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium
>
>   [ Fabio Fantoni ]
>   * New maintainer (Closes: #969191)
>   * another changes to makeiso.sh to make the build reproducible:
> - add -uid and -gid to 0 to xorriso options
> - replaced "echo -e" with printf
>   * d/postinst: don't run update-grub if in a container
>   * d/control: remove mention of lpia arch
>
>   [ Debian Janitor ]
>   * Trim trailing whitespace.
>   * Use secure URI in Homepage field.
>   * Bump debhelper from old 12 to 13.
>   * Update renamed lintian tag names in lintian overrides.
>
>  -- Fabio Fantoni  Sun, 06 Feb 2022 21:35:43
> +0100
>
> memtest86+ (5.31b+dfsg-3) experimental; urgency=medium
>
>   * QA upload.
>   * d/control: replace genisoimage build-dep with xorriso
>   * removed d/patches/make-iso-reproducible
>   * d/patches/use-xorriso-instead-cdrkit.patch:
> cdrkit is not supported anymore, use xorriso instead
> also aded the modification of date part to make the build
> reproducible (Closes: #982240)
>   * use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH instead of add BUILD_DATE in d/rules
>   * d/rules:
> - use dh_auto_build instead of make
> - restore a change for kfreebsd
>
>  -- Fabio Fantoni  Sat, 22 Jan 2022 18:20:23
> +0100
>
> memtest86+ (5.31b+dfsg-2) experimental; urgency=medium
>
>   * QA upload.
>   * d/patches/dmi-more-ram-slots-and-buffer-overflow-fix.patch:
> prevent crash for buffer overflow in DMI memory and increase
> supported memory devices from 16 to 128 (Closes: #1003906)
> Thanks to Lionel Debroux
>
>  -- Fabio Fantoni  Tue, 18 Jan 2022 18:30:04
> +0100
>
> memtest86+ (5.31b+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=medium
>
>   [ Fabio Fantoni ]
>   * QA upload.
>   * New upstream version 5.31b (Closes: #989030, #977217)
>   * Merge from ubuntu:
> - Use elf version by default that should works on major of system.
> - Drop the multiboot image from the GRUB menu for now, since it's
>   experimental and has known problems detecting all memory on some
>   systems at the moment.
> - Support localization of GRUB menu entries.
> - Don't present in GRUB menu on EFI systems, since it won't work.
>   (Closes: #695246)
> - Close FD 3 when invoking update-grub.
>   * Warn that don't support EFI instead of exit silently (LP: 1863940)
>   * Don't add grub2 entries if GRUB_DISABLE_MEMTEST=true is present
> in /etc/default/grub (LP: #420967)
>   * Make possible disable serial with GRUB_MEMTEST_DISABLE_SERIAL,
> enable multiboot with GRUB_MEMTEST_ENABLE_MULTIBOOT and add
> custom serial parameters with GRUB_MEMTEST_SERIAL_PARAMS
> (Closes: #898636, #612371)
>   * Specify on grub2 menu entries when elf and bin are used
>   * d/control: Remove hwtools and kernel-patch-badram from suggests.
>   * d/copyright: add Upstream-Name, Upstream-Contact and Source fields
>   * Bumped Standards-Version to 4.6.0
>   * d/patches:
> - update multiboot patch from coreboot patch based on the one of
>   Vladimir Serbinenko and refreshed for 5.31b (Closes: #568176)
> - refresh memtest86+-5.01-O0.patch
> - disable memtest86+-5.01-array-size.patch and gcc-5 as seems not
>   needed with newer upstream version
> - refresh serial-console-fix.patch
> - add test-random-cflags.patch: use CFLAGS with random.o for
>   maintain flags like -fno-stack-protector
> - add fix-gcc8-freeze-crash.patch: runtime fix for gcc>=8
>   freeze/crash
> - add discard-note_gnu_property.patch: discards the
>   ".note.gnu.property" section that causes crash in some cases
>
>   [ Jérémy Bobbio ]
>   * Make the package build reproducibly:
> - Add a patch to make ISO image reproducible.
> - Set the build date to the latest debian/changelog entry in
>   debian/rules. (Closes: #783515)
>
>  -- Fabio Fantoni  Sun, 09 Jan 2022 21:41:58
> +0100
>
> memtest86+ (5.01-4) unstable; urgency=medium
>
>   [ Fabio Fantoni ]
>   * QA upload.
>   * switch package to use dh and bump compat to 12
> (Closes: #999226, #965720)
>   * update debian/watch
>
>   [ Yann Dirson ]
>   * Add Vcs-* fields 

Re: [Bug 1959115] Re: update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new backport process

2022-02-13 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Which version have you tested?  backportpackge in u-d-t 0.187+ should
already be using the ~bp suffix.
Notably, note that 0.187 is available in focal-bpo.

On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, 8:35 pm Ross Gammon, <1959...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> Regarding the requestbackport package, it is really only the template
> for the bug report that needs to change from memory. I don't think it
> had any other workflow related information. Once that is fixed, it just
> needs a reference from the backports process wiki again (like it used to
> have).
>
> Regarding the backportpackage script, I just tried it, and it is fine for
> testing in a ppa. I think we could already recommend using this on the wiki
> with a ppa specified in the -u option. Perhaps a warning not to upload to
> the archive with it yet would be required though. I had hoped I could
> specify the new "bpo" version string with the suffix option, but according
> to the manpage, the "~ubuntu" bit is hardwired:
> -S SUFFIX, --suffix=SUFFIX
>   Add the specified suffix to the version number when
> backporting.
>   backportpackage  will  always append ~ubuntuDESTINATION.1 to
> the
>   original version number, and if SUFFIX is specified, it  is
> ap‐
>   pended to that, to get version numbers of the form
> ORIGINAL_VER‐
>   SION~ubuntuDESTINATION.1SUFFIX. If the backported package is
> be‐
>   ing  uploaded to a PPA, then SUFFIX defaults to ~ppa1,
> otherwise
>   the default is blank.
>
> Now that a bug is always required, I suppose the script should prompt
> for that, and the "-c/--close" options be taken away.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
> Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959115
>
> Title:
>   update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according
>   to new backport process
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1959115/+subscriptions
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959115

Title:
  update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according
  to new backport process

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1959115/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: [Bug 1960752] Re: [BPO] gramps/5.1.4-1 from Jammy

2022-02-13 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Debhelper 13 is available in focal-backports already.

Please make sure your build environment enables the backports pocket (and
that your dependency solver handles it appropriately).
If you are building in a PPA, there is an extra flag to check in the PPA
settings.

On Sun, 13 Feb 2022, 9:45 pm Ross Gammon, <1960...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> Uploaded 5.1.4~bpo21.04.1 to impish-backports
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
> Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960752
>
> Title:
>   [BPO] gramps/5.1.4-1  from Jammy
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gramps/+bug/1960752/+subscriptions
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-backports mailing list
> ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960752

Title:
  [BPO] gramps/5.1.4-1  from Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gramps/+bug/1960752/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1876996] Re: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy

2022-02-08 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876996

Title:
  [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1876996/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1876996] Re: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy

2022-02-08 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
If possible I'd prefer to avoid an extra bpo diff just for this, so I'd
rather accept it as it is.

(Also, ragel is fine to skip because it doesn't change anything in
practice, it only used to rebuild something that is otherwise pre-
compiled in the tarball; whereas disabling gspell would effectively
change the feature set, something that I'd dislike to see done across
architectures).


With your ACK I'm then going to accept my own upload, thank you for the through 
review!

** Changed in: inkscape (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876996

Title:
  [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1876996/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1876996] Re: [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy

2022-02-08 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
meh, I didn't notice that, thank you.

Looking at the germinate-output file, it looks like gtkspell3 is included in 
the seed starting with groovy only because of it being a build-dep of inkscape 
(it's a new build-dep starting with inkscape 1.x, focal has 0.92.x).
This also means that a no-change rebuild wouldn't help, it would first need a 
manual addition to the i386.focal seed, which would be a pain to do. Plus 
gtkspell3's version is the same from focal all the way to jammy, so I'd need to 
SRU them all...

Honestly, in this case I would propose to just ignore that matter, and
just say that inkscape/focal-backport will not be available in i386.


Personally, I actually find no reason for inkscape to be in the i386 seed (it's 
there only as a build-dep of a i386-only package), and I'm actually working 
(more or less, it's a plan) to drop it from there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876996

Title:
  [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1876996/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1876996] Re: [new upstream]Inkscape 1.0

2022-01-27 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
I'm uploading now version 1.1.1-3ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1 to focal-backports,
so that the team can review it.

** Changed in: inkscape (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Triaged => In Progress

** Summary changed:

- [new upstream]Inkscape 1.0
+ [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876996

Title:
  [BPO] inkscape/1.1.1-3ubuntu1 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1876996/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1959115] Re: update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new backport process

2022-01-26 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Summary changed:

- update backportpackage script to behave according to new backport process
+ update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according to new 
backport process

** Description changed:

- The 'backportpackage' script needs to be updated to work according to the new 
backport process:
+ The 'requestbackport' script needs to be updated to the new workflow.
+ The Backporters team doesn't take on *requests* to do backports anymore, so 
most likely this script should be turned into a simpler pointer to the wiki 
page, rather than actually do anything.
+ 
+ The 'backportpackage' script needs to be checked if the latest update
+ covered all the differences from the previous workflow.
+ 
+ 
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports
  
+ 
  This bug is to track that work.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959115

Title:
  update backportpackage and requestbackport scripts to behave according
  to new backport process

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1959115/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1956004] Re: [BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy

2022-01-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Yeah, it's fine, those are really small details that just raises a small
eyebrow but do nothing else :)


You are right, the process is completed.  The package also already built, and 
will be available in the archive in a matter of minutes/hours when the 
publisher runs :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004

Title:
  [BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencpn/+bug/1956004/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1956004] Re: [BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy

2022-01-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Looking at the diff, I also find it odd that you are changing d/watch
(according to the changelog, to please lintian?).  That's totally
useless and just noisy (nobody is going to run uscan on this...), so I
recommend you don't do that at the next backport update.

Likewise I'm not sure why you didn't drop that delta related to
debhelper 12/13 as Dan suggested.  It also doesn't really matter in the
end, but I don't understand your point about d/rules and dh_missing…

It also looks like you added a debian/docs file adding a README.  I'm
going to ignore this as it is of little consequence, but if you'd like
to install such README please do that in a debian/opencpn.docs file
(instead of debian/docs) and do that in debian first.

With this, consider the package approved.

** Changed in: opencpn (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004

Title:
  [BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencpn/+bug/1956004/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1958772] [NEW] [BPO] lib2geom/1.1-2 from jammy

2022-01-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Public bug reported:

[Impact]

 * This is a new dependency of inkscape 1.1, which I plan to backport to
focal (see #1876996).

[Scope]

 * from: jammy, lib2geom/1.1-2

 * to: focal

[Other Info]
 
 * new library with no other users outside of inkscape.
 * technically inkscape itself contains an embedded lib2geom (which I'm using 
in ubuntu/i386 as it's not in the i386 whitelist), however I prefer to keep the 
split for policy reasons if I can.

** Affects: lib2geom (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
 Status: Invalid

** Affects: lib2geom (Ubuntu Focal)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
 Status: In Progress

** Also affects: lib2geom (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: lib2geom (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)

** Changed in: lib2geom (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: lib2geom (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958772

Title:
  [BPO] lib2geom/1.1-2 from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lib2geom/+bug/1958772/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: [Bug 1956004] Re: [BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy

2022-01-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
> Looking at that queue is somewhat scary, I see an entry from
2021-10-28

that's for the proposed pocked (i.e. SRUs), for backports yours is the
only package in the queue...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004

Title:
  [BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencpn/+bug/1956004/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1956004] Re: [BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy

2022-01-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
> Is that mentioned at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports ?

u.U - somehow, despite the plenty of reviews we made to the drafts of
that page we still managed to miss it.

thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004

Title:
  [BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencpn/+bug/1956004/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1956644] Re: [BPO] gallery-dl 1.20.0-1 to focal

2022-01-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Actually, forget it, I see this is a new package, so it's fine.   diff
also looks ok, so I approved it.

(the comment still stands for when jammy will be stable though)

** Changed in: focal-backports
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Project changed: focal-backports => gallery-dl (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956644

Title:
  [BPO] gallery-dl 1.20.0-1 to focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gallery-dl/+bug/1956644/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1956644] Re: [BPO] gallery-dl 1.20.0-1 to focal

2022-01-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
the "fix broken extractors" bit is normally something that should be
handled via SRUs.  Is that happening?  If not, is there a plan for it,
or is this just something that users are living with?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956644

Title:
  [BPO] gallery-dl 1.20.0-1 to focal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gallery-dl/+bug/1956644/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


meeting on 2021-12-29

2021-12-27 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi,

I see that Dan hasn't formally scheduled the meeting after all (at
least, it's not in my calendar?), but regardless mostly due to me being
sick last week I didn't really do anything for ubuntu's backports.

As such, should we indeed adjurn directly to Jan 12th?
ISTR we decided last time to "try" and hold it on the 29th, with the
agreement that if indeed there was nothing to discuss to just skip it
over.

-- 
regards,
        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1947192] Re: [BPO] ubuntu-dev-tools/0.187

2021-12-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
note that the team wasn't subscribed, so this bug fell off, at least, my
radar.

anyhow, I'm reusing this bug very badly since it wasn't yet fully
closed; in hindsight 2 minutes after I made the change I figured I was
better opening a new one, but well..

I've now uploaded 0.187 everywhere, bionic, focal, hirsute, impish.
Note that bionic and focal require the new debhelper that is also in the
queue, see the related bug.

** Summary changed:

- [BPO] version 0.185
+ [BPO] ubuntu-dev-tools/0.187

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Bionic)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)

** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Impish)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947192

Title:
  [BPO] ubuntu-dev-tools/0.187

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1947192/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1728423] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.5+

2021-12-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Can't do xenial anymore since it's EOL.

** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ 
+  * This package is included amongst the "special cases".
+  * dwz is needed in bionic as debhelper grew a versioned dependency there.
+I preferred to backport it as well, rather than dropping the 
+restriction (it's required for golang apparently).
+ 
+ [Scope]
+ 
+  * debhelper 13.5.2ubuntu1 from jammy towards all supported releases.
+  * dwz 0.13-5 from focal to bionic
+ 
+ [Other Info]
+  
+  * I already used the backported version to, for example, build
+ubuntu-dev-tools; besides, debhelper ships with a decent testsuite
+  * For debhelper/bionic I had to do some changes, see
+https://bugs.debian.org/1001403
+ 
+ 
+ [ Original Report ]
+ 
  As debhelper 10.3
  
(https://github.com/Debian/debhelper/commit/f771a9a62802733fea6801dacde3badee13ef8c0)
  added support for the meson build system, it would be great to have a
  newer version of debhelper in xenial-backports than 10.2.2.

** Changed in: dwz (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728423

Title:
  [BPO] debhelper/13.5+

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1728423/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1728423] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.5+

2021-12-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Also affects: dwz (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: dwz (Ubuntu Xenial)

** No longer affects: dwz (Ubuntu Focal)

** No longer affects: dwz (Ubuntu Hirsute)

** No longer affects: dwz (Ubuntu Impish)

** Changed in: dwz (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Xenial)
   Status: Triaged => Won't Fix

** Changed in: dwz (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: dwz (Ubuntu Bionic)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728423

Title:
  [BPO] debhelper/13.5+

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1728423/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1728423] Re: [BPO] debhelper/13.5+

2021-12-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728423

Title:
  [BPO] debhelper/13.5+

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1728423/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Bug#1001399: lintian: adjust backports-upload-has-incorrect-version-number for ubuntu

2021-12-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Package: lintian
Version: 2.114
X-Debbugs-Cc: ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com

Hi,

So, I have this:

E: debhelper changes: backports-upload-has-incorrect-version-number 
13.5.2ubuntu1~bpo20.04.1

However, in Ubuntu we just started up again the process, and the new
policy says to append ~bpo$UBU_VERSION.1, with $UBU_VERSION 20.04,
18.04, 20.10, etc.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports#Preparing_the_Backported_Package

Do you think you could adjust the value of this tag when run under
ubuntu (so, I suppose, run with the ubuntu profile)?

TIA!

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1827367] Re: rabbitmq-server outdated

2021-12-05 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
FYI, the Backports project restarted.  Although we have yet to announce
it formally, you can find the new process here
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports

I'm unsubscribing the backporters team from this bug since to me it
seems there is nothing to do by us, but if and when somebody is going to
follow through with those steps please do re-subscribe the team!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827367

Title:
  rabbitmq-server outdated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elixir-lang/+bug/1827367/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1464870] Re: Please backport ntfs-3g 2015.3.14AR.1-1ubuntu0.1 (main) from Xenial

2021-12-05 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Both precise and trusty are EOL, so I'm closing this bug.

** Changed in: ntfs-3g (Baltix)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464870

Title:
  Please backport ntfs-3g 2015.3.14AR.1-1ubuntu0.1  (main) from Xenial

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/trusty-backports/+bug/1464870/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1876996] Re: [new upstream]Inkscape 1.0

2021-12-05 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Now that the BPO process has been renewed I'm going to follow through it
(also, the SRU team never answered here, proof that they only look at
bugs when uploads get into the queue…).

Although, I'm currently quite busy, so it'll take a bit of time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876996

Title:
  [new upstream]Inkscape 1.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1876996/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


  1   2   >