Re: Unison and some questions (was: Unison)
On 11/13/05, John Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks siretart! My bad, puc doesn't show source packages in quick search. May I suggest/introduce the package 'madison-lite' to you? Here is an example output the way I configured it: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ madison-lite dosage dosage |1.5.2-1 |stable | all dosage |1.5.5-1 | testing | all dosage |1.5.5-1 | unstable | source, all dosage |1.5.3-1 |breezy | source dosage | 1.5.5-1ubuntu1 |dapper | source I image that this could be quite useful for you backporters. -- regards, Reinhard -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Unison and some questions (was: Unison)
ooh, very very cool! Definitely more convenient than p.u.c. What's new in Dapper's 1.5? Anything worth backporting? ;-)On 11/13/05, Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 11/13/05, John Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks siretart!My bad, puc doesn't show source packages in quick search.May I suggest/introduce the package 'madison-lite' to you? Here is an example output the way I configured it:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ madison-lite dosagedosage |1.5.2-1 |stable | alldosage |1.5.5-1 | testing | alldosage |1.5.5-1 |unstable | source, alldosage |1.5.3-1 |breezy | sourcedosage | 1.5.5-1ubuntu1 |dapper | sourceI image that this could be quite useful for you backporters.--regards, Reinhard--ubuntu-backports mailing listubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Unison and some questions (was: Unison)
Sorry, I have no good way of tracking arrivals, except that James e-mails back done when he sends it through the build system.On 11/13/05, Shot - Piotr Szotkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hello.John Dong: Is there a mailing list or a feed with the new breezy-backports arrivals? I have your 'mc is approved for backporting' email; it would be great, though, if there were something akin to dapper-updates or its RSS feed of when the packages actually appear in the archive. Well, mail filtering for CC's to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should give you the same results as dapper-updates. Right, but the emails are about approvals (like your Friday emailabout mc), not arrivals - or am I missing something, and there willbe a separate email when mc makes it to the breezy-backports archive? The 'approved' emails are very useful; I keep the Friday email in mymail folder and check `apt-cache policy mc` from time to time, but thebest solution would be to have an email list (or, better yet, a feed) on actual breezy-backports *arrivals*.// Sorry if I'm asking for a lot; I respect your work very much and// thank a lot for the time you put in it; I would simply like the// outcome to be as useful for everybody as it can be. :o) Cheers,-- Shot--The belief in the possibility of a short decisive war appears to be oneof the most ancient and dangerous of human illusions.-- Robert Lynd== http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ ===-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)iD8DBQFDd3oti/mCfdEo8UoRApASAJ9KPrIPZUaWHYnSEikyrZVVb37kIgCgyVLu J3GYTMgFk78riV8R19foziw==m6SK-END PGP SIGNATURE---ubuntu-backports mailing listubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Unison and some questions (was: Unison)
Hello. Reinhard Tartler: May I suggest/introduce the package 'madison-lite' to you? Wow, your example look really useful! Thanks a lot for sharing. Here is an example output the way I configured it: Could you share the configuration? Does this tool require mirroring of the whole archive(s) or just the Packages and Sources files? (Excuse my asking, I usually don't have problems with parsing manpages, but the madison-lite's one doesn't make it clear whether I should mirror the archive(s) independently, whether the Packages/Sources suffice, etc.) Cheers, -- Shot -- First time I've gotten a programming job that required a drug test. I was worried they were going to say 'you don't have enough LSD in your system to do Unix programming.' -- Paul Tomblin, asr == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Unison and some questions (was: Unison)
Hello. Reinhard Tartler: On 11/13/05, Shot - Piotr Szotkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this tool require mirroring of the whole archive(s) or just the Packages and Sources files? please look in /usr/share/doc/madison-lite/* Er, right. Silly me. Thanks. :o) Based on the examples, I created a much simpler script that works for my much smaller needs (attached, if anyone else finds it useful). Is there a way to ask wget to not download the *.gz files if they have the same size and timestamp locally as on the server? The wget manpage suggests -N should be enough, but it doesn't work for me; the files are created with proper timestamps (2005-11-11 21:44 for experimental's main sources, for example), but are re-downloaded each time. Cheers, -- Shot -- If I have pinged farther than others, it is because I routed upon the T3s of giants.-- Greg Andrews == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === #!/bin/sh -e mirror='/home/shot/ubuntu/madison-lite/mirror' madison_conf='/home/shot/.madison-lite/config' deb_dists='unstable experimental' deb_parts='main contrib non-free' ub_dists='breezy breezy-security breezy-updates breezy-backports dapper dapper-security dapper-updates' ub_parts='main restricted universe multiverse' wget='wget -N -O' cd $mirror echo mirror $mirror $madison_conf for dist in $deb_dists; do for part in $deb_parts; do mkdir -p $dist/$part/binary-i386 mkdir -p $dist/$part/source $wget $dist/$part/binary-i386/Packages.gz http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/$dist/$part/binary-i386/Packages.gz $wget $dist/$part/source/Sources.gz http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/$dist/$part/source/Sources.gz done echo suite $dist $dist $madison_conf done for dist in $ub_dists; do for part in $ub_parts; do mkdir -p $dist/$part/binary-i386 mkdir -p $dist/$part/source $wget $dist/$part/binary-i386/Packages.gz http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/$dist/$part/binary-i386/Packages.gz $wget $dist/$part/source/Sources.gz http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/$dist/$part/source/Sources.gz done echo suite $dist $dist $madison_conf done signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Unison and some questions (was: Unison)
FWIW, here is a list of packages from Dapper and Debian I use: dosage 1.5.5-1.0~0shot1(from Debian sid, lessened build-deps)Not in Dapper. gtodo 0.14+cvs20050820-1 (Dapper's .deb) Success mc 4.6.1-1ubuntu2(Dapper's .deb) Already Filed phppgadmin 3.5.6-1 (Dapper's .deb; Breezy's has stupid dependencies) Approved, pending build test wesnoth 1.0.1-1(Dapper's .deb) Approved, pending build test xmoto 0.1.8-2~0shot1 (required a rebuild against Breezy's gcc) 0.1.7 in Dapper, nothing in Breezy and below. Do you want 0.1.7 instead? I'll take a look at that list for what's suitable. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: Unison and some questions (was: Unison)
Hello. John Dong: dosage 1.5.5-1.0~0shot1 (from Debian sid, lessened build-deps) Not in Dapper. Right, probably isn't autosynced because of the python-dev ( 2.4) build-dep. I dropped that build-dep and rebuilt it successfully on Breezy; I also notified the Debian maintainer, so if he drops the build-dep upstream, dosage will make the next sync. If not, I'll ask the Dapper team to do a 1.5.5-1ubuntu1 version and then ask for a backport here. gtodo 0.14+cvs20050820-1 (Dapper's .deb) Success phppgadmin 3.5.6-1 (Dapper's .deb; Breezy's has stupid dependencies) Approved, pending build test wesnoth 1.0.1-1 (Dapper's .deb) Approved, pending build test Thanks for the above! :o) xmoto 0.1.8-2~0shot1 (required a rebuild against Breezy's gcc) 0.1.7 in Dapper, nothing in Breezy and below. Do you want 0.1.7 instead? No, thanks. My private package works ok for me, and 0.1.8-2 will probably make it to Dapper on next sync; I'll ask then. Is there a mailing list or a feed with the new breezy-backports arrivals? I have your 'mc is approved for backporting' email; it would be great, though, if there were something akin to dapper-updates or its RSS feed of when the packages actually appear in the archive. Cheers, -- Shot -- Antioch CAPS LOCK IS LIKE CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL. == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
