[Ubuntu-QC] Connection réussie

2011-08-04 Thread mycuser
j'ai réussi à me logger

Michel Chassey

-- 
Ubuntu-quebec mailing list
Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec


[Ubuntu-QC] Quelqu'un a une idée?

2011-08-04 Thread David Giard
Bonjour à tous,

Je viens d'acheter le nom de domaine linux-qc.org, quelqu'un des idées de ce
qu'on pourrait faire avec?

Si yen a qui veulent des adresse email(forwarding), sa me dérange pas, tant
que mon fournisseur me charge rien de plus.

David Giard
-- 
Ubuntu-quebec mailing list
Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec


Re: [Ubuntu-QC] Mise a jour du site web

2011-08-04 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
2011/8/3 David Giard swe3td...@ubuntu.com:
 Le site web est de retour en ligne. Maintenant, j'aurais besoin de
 testeurs pour se logger au site avec leur openid launchpad. Envoyez moi
 un courriel personnel et dite moi si ça bien fonctionné. Merci

Excellent travail David.

J'ai une seule question: peut-on revoir le design du site un peu (en
fait, le design du thème)?

Il me semble que ce ne soit pas la bonne teinte de orange utilisée à
différents endroits. Celle qui me frappe le plus, c'est le header, qui
apparaît être un peu trop pâle. (pour comparaison, je crois que la
couleur plus foncée utilisée pour le header sur le wiki Ubuntu
officiel serait #d05630)

La teinte correcte devrait être #dd4814. Malheureusement, je n'ai pas
tout à fait les bons outils pour vérifier, mais les informations sur
les couleurs en HTML découvre cinq teintes différentes (orange ou
pêche) utilisées dans la page principale.


Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre mathieu...@gmail.com
Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com
4096R/EE018C93 1967 8F7D 03A1 8F38 732E  FF82 C126 33E1 EE01 8C93

-- 
Ubuntu-quebec mailing list
Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec


[Ubuntu-QC] Ajouter du contenu sur le site web

2011-08-04 Thread David Giard
Bonjour à tous,

Premièrement, merci à tout ceux qui m'ont aidé à tester le site web.
Merci à Patrick Hétu, pour m'avoir suggérer d'installer disqus, un
nouveau système de commentaire qui devrait nous aider à filtrer le spam.
Si vous voyez du spam dans un commentaire, il suffit de flagger le
commentaire pour le faire disparaitre. Il sera alors envoyé à un
modérateur qui saura quoi faire avec.

Deuxièmement, si yen a qui aimerai avoir accès pour ajouter du contenu
sur le site web, tel que des annonces d'événements, envoyez moi un
courriel en me donnant votre nom d'usager et une description du contenu
que vous voulez ajouter. Je vous donnerai alors un accès bloggeur, ce
qui vous permettra même d'ajouter le flux de votre blog(si vous en avez
un, SVP vérifier que votre flux contient uniquement du contenu en
rapport avec Ubuntu ou Linux).

Et finalement, j'ai encore besoin de testeurs, SVP ajouter un
commentaire à cette page:
http://www.ubuntu-qc.org/drupal/node/531379

Merci,

David Giard



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-quebec mailing list
Ubuntu-quebec@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quebec


Ubuntu Studio Contributors meeting on 2011-08-07 17:00 UTC - Reminder

2011-08-04 Thread Janne Jokitalo
Hi all!

It's time for the montly Ubuntu Studio Contributors meeting again, this Sunday
at 17:00 UTC, check this link to find the meeting time in your timezone:

http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Ubuntu+Studio+Contributor+Meetingiso=20110807T17
.

The meeting will be held on freenode in the #ubuntu-meeting channel. Click this
link to use the freenode webchat client: 

http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=ubuntu-meetinguio=d4

You will be prompted to choose a nickname, and enter text to prove you are
human, then you'll join the #ubuntu-meeting channel. You can find the meeting
agenda here: 

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2011August7

as well as the archives of past meetings here:

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings
.

If you have questions prior to the meeting, respond either here on the mailing
list, add items on the agenda above, or use this webchat link to join the 
#ubuntustudio-devel channel

http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=ubuntustudio-develuio=d4

(or any of your preferred ways to get on the IRC). Also, you can check out:

http://www.ubuntu-news.org/calendars/fridge/

if you would like to join and see other official team meetings.

*REMINDER* This is meeting is held in the official meeting room 
#ubuntu-meeting. If you join that channel prior to our reserved meeting time, 
please be considerate and respectful of other meetings in progress.

Thanks!


-- 
Jaska a.k.a. astraljava @ irc.freenode.org



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel


ARM IRC Meeting Reminder

2011-08-04 Thread Michael Casadevall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

  Every Thursday at 15:00 UTC.

We'll be having the usual IRC meeting on #ubuntu-meeting, on
Thursday 2011-08-04 at 15:00 UTC.

The meeting agenda is available here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileTeam/Meeting/2011/20110804

The meeting history page with links to prior meetings is at:
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileTeam/Meeting

Thank you,
Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOOlyPAAoJEGKVRgSEnX1QI8gH/iJXRRjsR8tdggiVyPzWHptz
0IzxDgaslnnnNXDAdLYQIestKL59F8iDJX0gNV+LP8mW6gJybJfyNhfz01fRrWs4
M3YQbaj8+qbdJqgJ3RrMvSe5xRnY275Zjj5rY5dCS/r1DO4AfSKzeE6l4xOpMwEX
lz4Gv/6fvHrBiLqRkxuu8e0N0wrrI4ee8TLYxZGAKmBU8+G/a61YfPHR6sWEjdvl
zp+mWR+/qvTzDcR66zCY1z4LSQwfqQdi/RfcgGHNTcQ0/dYiA+S+/2tGbZ5yoaJi
Jj15HBiwxiPtfSqlYVrc1PZGjYKLfBzAVRWMiFtVaE0BenZnO8JQyp3QbkfHFY8=
=758W
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
 
 Much of this entire discussion was started by Canonical employees wanting 
 special case treatment for upstream work sponsored by Canonical. 
this is totally untrue if i read the log [1] from the meeting that
caused you to start this rant against canonical ... 

... seriously, if you say something in an ubuntu meeting, how often have
you been blamed to speak for your company ... ?

if i read this meeting log, i see that one LP developer (henninge)
applied for membership and was turned down for not having documented
enough stuff on his wikipage ...

...he then expressed *surprise* that his LP contribution isnt supposed
to count at all (according to iulians words), apparently two other
people that read the meeting too expressed the same surprise (i would
have too) ...

sorry, but nowhere in the meeting log i see a line where anyone asks for
special treatment, i dont even see any rant, heat or argument, just
three people expressing their surprise (each with exactly one line)
about iulians attitude that LP contributions dont count at all.

now it happens that all these three persons are canonical employees ...
does that mean they speak for canonical ? 
do you really blame dell for everything superm1 says on irc, should i
blame your company for everything you say ... ?

  It was a 
 Canonical employee that proposed to the Tech Board, without even consulting 
 with the DMB first, to change how the DMB could assess applications and 
 restrict their ability to deny applications.  

no, it was an individual that happens to be employed by canonical and
there was surely no order from his/her manager to do that ...

 Multiple members of multiple 
 boards have complained they feel like they are subject to harrassment from 
 Canonical managers if they don't approve a Canonical applicant.  The 
 agree/disagree ratio on your proposed change in how to change the application 
 process was roughly reversed depending on if someone was employed by 
 Canonical 
 or not.
 
 I think there is a serious split between the Canonical and non-Canonical 
 parts 
 of the community right now and trying to pretend it doesn't exist doesn't 
 help.
putting oil on the fire and accusing individual statements to be orders
by the employer wont really help to solve it either ...

   I think it is broad and systematic.  I don't believe it's intentional.  
 I do believe it's a problem.

i do belive it is a problem that you assume canonical behind everything
a canonical employee says. thats not the case ! 
even if a manager twitters out of frustration that a friend and team
member of him didnt get approval, THIS IS NOT a statement from
canonical ...

there is no pressure canonical applies here to anything nor is there a
secret cabal to take over the community ...

as an ubuntu member i must say i feel pretty offended by that attitude
that gets spread by mail threads like this one that obviously have no
foundation. it makes my words as ubuntu member invaluable since
according to your theory all i say is put in my mouth by my employer
anyway ... please stop that, it makes this community an unpleasant
place 

lets identify the issues *with the individuals* and fix them and stop
seeing a conspiratory masterplan behind everything ...

ciao
oli


[1] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/08/02/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, August 04, 2011 06:01:01 AM Oliver Grawert wrote:
 hi,
 
 Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
  Much of this entire discussion was started by Canonical employees wanting
  special case treatment for upstream work sponsored by Canonical.
 
 this is totally untrue if i read the log [1] from the meeting that
 caused you to start this rant against canonical ...
 
 ... seriously, if you say something in an ubuntu meeting, how often have
 you been blamed to speak for your company ... ?
 
 if i read this meeting log, i see that one LP developer (henninge)
 applied for membership and was turned down for not having documented
 enough stuff on his wikipage ...
 
 ...he then expressed *surprise* that his LP contribution isnt supposed
 to count at all (according to iulians words), apparently two other
 people that read the meeting too expressed the same surprise (i would
 have too) ...
 
 sorry, but nowhere in the meeting log i see a line where anyone asks for
 special treatment, i dont even see any rant, heat or argument, just
 three people expressing their surprise (each with exactly one line)
 about iulians attitude that LP contributions dont count at all.
 
 now it happens that all these three persons are canonical employees ...
 does that mean they speak for canonical ?
 do you really blame dell for everything superm1 says on irc, should i
 blame your company for everything you say ... ?
 
   It was a
  
  Canonical employee that proposed to the Tech Board, without even
  consulting with the DMB first, to change how the DMB could assess
  applications and restrict their ability to deny applications.
 
 no, it was an individual that happens to be employed by canonical and
 there was surely no order from his/her manager to do that ...
 
  Multiple members of multiple
  boards have complained they feel like they are subject to harrassment
  from Canonical managers if they don't approve a Canonical applicant. 
  The agree/disagree ratio on your proposed change in how to change the
  application process was roughly reversed depending on if someone was
  employed by Canonical or not.
  
  I think there is a serious split between the Canonical and non-Canonical
  parts of the community right now and trying to pretend it doesn't exist
  doesn't help.
 
 putting oil on the fire and accusing individual statements to be orders
 by the employer wont really help to solve it either ...
 
I think it is broad and systematic.  I don't believe it's intentional.
  
  I do believe it's a problem.
 
 i do belive it is a problem that you assume canonical behind everything
 a canonical employee says. thats not the case !
 even if a manager twitters out of frustration that a friend and team
 member of him didnt get approval, THIS IS NOT a statement from
 canonical ...
 
 there is no pressure canonical applies here to anything nor is there a
 secret cabal to take over the community ...
 
 as an ubuntu member i must say i feel pretty offended by that attitude
 that gets spread by mail threads like this one that obviously have no
 foundation. it makes my words as ubuntu member invaluable since
 according to your theory all i say is put in my mouth by my employer
 anyway ... please stop that, it makes this community an unpleasant
 place
 
 lets identify the issues *with the individuals* and fix them and stop
 seeing a conspiratory masterplan behind everything ...
 
 ciao
   oli
 
 
 [1] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/08/02/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt

That is just one issue of many.  As another one, I'll give you [2] where an 
Canonical employee's boss ranted at the RMB for not approving an application.

Your characterization of what I said is pretty much the opposite of what I 
meant.  In a different reply in this thread I said:

I don't think bias is the right word.  I think there is a tendency to have a 
different perspective.  I don't think anyone is being evil or disingenuous.  I 
think that different perspective causes us to have different views of what the 
project is and thus what is an appropriate criteria for membership, etc, much 
of the recent discussion.

There has been a lot of discussion about people wanting work on Canonical 
projects other than Ubuntu to count as Ubuntu contributions.  I don't know how 
to consider that as anything other than wanting special treatment.  Should we 
grant Ubuntu membership to every DD because their work supports Ubuntu 
directly and is critical to it's success?  We don't.  Why should Canonical 
projects be different?

As I said in the other mail, I don't think there is some grand design or 
conspiracy going on.  I think that there is a genuine difference of perspective 
and it's causing friction.  I'm more willing to speak publically on the matter 
than others, but the perception I am trying to communicate is broadly shared 
(check the logs of #ubuntu-motu yesterday for some of the non-email feedback 
that was at least public).

There are a lot of 

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 hi,
 Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman:

 Much of this entire discussion was started by Canonical employees wanting
 special case treatment for upstream work sponsored by Canonical.
 this is totally untrue if i read the log [1] from the meeting that
 caused you to start this rant against canonical ...

See Robbie  Dustin both second-guessing the DMB here in [2]
Dustin got upset here [3], when an applicant who said he believed his
work to be on a separate project [4] did not get accepted.
There was also the time Robbie criticized the regional board for
saying Kate hadn't been around long enough yet for membership [5]

 [1] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/08/02/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt

[2] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/20/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t21:19
[3] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t20:00
[4] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t19:45
[5] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/12/17/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t04:21

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 Am 04.08.2011 15:32 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan maco...@gmail.com:


 On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
  hi,
  Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
 
  Much of this entire discussion was started by Canonical employees
  wanting
  special case treatment for upstream work sponsored by Canonical.
  this is totally untrue if i read the log [1] from the meeting that
  caused you to start this rant against canonical ...

 See Robbie  Dustin both second-guessing the DMB here in [2]
 Dustin got upset here [3], when an applicant who said he believed his
 work to be on a separate project [4] did not get accepted.
 There was also the time Robbie criticized the regional board for
 saying Kate hadn't been around long enough yet for membership [5]

  [1] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/08/02/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt

 [2] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/20/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t21:19
 [3] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t20:00
 [4] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t19:45
 [5] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/12/17/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t04:21

 So you identfied robbiew, dustin, jcastro and skaet as people that have a
 differing opinion about contributions than the DMB has, i hope you are aware
 that canonical has nerly 500 employees, why does everyone here seem to think
 that what less than 1% of the company employees say reflects the attitude of
 canonical ?

I'd actually take Kate off that list. In that log, you can see that
she says she only applied at that time because Robbie  Jono said to.
I don't think everybody at Canonical shares that opinion, but the
pattern of Canonical manager gets angry when his employee is
rejected is pretty obvious to anyone on any of the boards.  Do I
honestly believe there are some managers at Canonical who think that
the way membership works is:
- Hire someone
- Wait a token number of months
- Get new hire to write an application
- New hire writes a meh application
- Get other team members to all write testimonials because quantity
beats quality
- Automatic approval

YES!

 did anyone talk to the persons individually? what did you do to sort this
 in an individual manner with the respective person?

To Kate, yes. She didn't go off mid-meeting or rant in-channel.  I
talked to her later about how to improve her application (like
including representing Ubuntu at DebConf).  The others seem to prefer
to air their grievances publicly in-channel.

 or did you just think
 screw it, these canonical bastards again, sigh and blame canonical for
 their opinions ?

More like:
Ugh, these two getting upset about the people they manage being
rejected. Again. How predictable! *eye roll*

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: SRUs for typo fixes in descriptions

2011-08-04 Thread Brian Murray
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:46:06PM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
 Excerpts from Micah Gersten's message of Wed Aug 03 12:55:09 -0700 2011:
  So, there are a couple merge proposals right now for control file
  description typo fixes for natty:
  https://code.launchpad.net/~bones/ubuntu/oneiric/gnomebaker/fix-for-818364/+merge/70234
  https://code.launchpad.net/~bones/ubuntu/natty/radiotray/fix-for-722886/+merge/70107
  
  The package has either been removed or fixed in the dev release, so
  that's not an issue.
  So, something like this would seeming be fine in conjunction with
  another SRU, but wouldn't qualify on its own for one if I understand
  correctly.
  I'm wondering if there should be a queue for these fix only with
  something else, or if we should just close won't fix (see SRU policy).
  
 
 Hmm, SRU policy may need some clarification.
 
 See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
 
 Specifically the When section, quoted below:
  When
 
  Stable release updates will, in general, only be issued in order
  to fix high-impact bugs. Examples of such bugs include:
  
  * Bugs which may, under realistic circumstances, directly cause a security
  vulnerability. These are done by the security team and are documented
  at SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures.
  
  * Bugs which represent severe regressions from the previous release of
  Ubuntu. This includes packages which are totally unusable, like being
  uninstallable or crashing on startup.
  
  * Bugs which may, under realistic circumstances, directly cause a loss of
  user data
  
  * Bugs which do not fit under above categories, but (1) have an
  obviously safe patch and (2) affect an application rather than critical
  infrastructure packages (like X.org or the kernel).
 
 I actually think the language on the page needs a little work. Must *all*
 bugs be high impact? Or are they ok if they don't fit into that category.
 
 Both of the mentioned merge proposals have an obviously safe patch,
 and affect only an application, not anything in the infrastructure.
 
 I think peoples' time is better spent elsewhere.. but if somebody in
 the community wants to spend time correcting the spelling mistakes,
 our policy is not really clear as to whether or not this is ok.
 
 I'd propose that the policy be changed to be more clear on this matter.
 
 Something like this:
 
 
 Stable release updates will, in general, only be issued in order to fix high 
 impact bugs.
 This includes all bugs fitting into the following three categories:
 
 * ... security
 
 * ... severe regressions
 
 * ... data loss
 
 {note no bullet for this paragraph}
 Low and medium impact bugs which (1) have an obviously safe patch and (2)
 affect an application rather than critical infrastructure packages, will be
 considered when fixed in conjunction with high impact fixes. The following
 exceptions are made to the high impact rule explicitly:
 
 * ... LTS hardware
 
 * ... Commercial partner software
 
 * ... FTBFS

This should also be modified to include:

 * ... Apport package hook additions

Due to the fact that the volume of bug reports come from the stable
release it is often most helpful to get an apport package hook into the
stable release rather than waiting up to 6 months for the development
release to become the stable release.  Additionally, these do not affect
the core functionality of the package itself rather just how bugs are
reported about it.

--
Brian Murray
Ubuntu Bug Master


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:12 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan:
 I'd actually take Kate off that list. 
why ? she expressed her surprise about LP contributions not counting as
well in tuesdays meeting. the same apparently made jorge be a bad
canonical guy, why isnt this the case for kate ?
neither of them ranted or argued in the meeting and still it caused the
discussion we currently have.

  I
 honestly believe there are some managers at Canonical who think that
 the way membership works is:
 - Hire someone
 - Wait a token number of months
 - Get new hire to write an application
 - New hire writes a meh application
 - Get other team members to all write testimonials because quantity
 beats quality
 - Automatic approval
 
 YES!
GOD ! 

If you really think canonical managers have the time to even remotely
think about such plans, dont you think they would just try to change the
rules instead of making up a fake process ?

seriously there are canonical teams where your first objective is to try
to achieve membership in ubuntu within your first six months, becoming
an ubuntu member is encouraged all across the company docs and i think
from a management perspective thats as far as it goes ...

indeed if you want to get testimonials from people trhat worked with
you, you will ask your co-workers.

meh applications will get rejected no matter if you are canonical or
not. 

  or did you just think
  screw it, these canonical bastards again, sigh and blame canonical for
  their opinions ?
 
 More like:
 Ugh, these two getting upset about the people they manage being
 rejected. Again. How predictable! *eye roll*
and what forbids them from being like that ? go ahead, fill the gap in
their knowledge so they are not upset next time, if things are
predictable for you you should as well be able to change them.
 
i dont think we have a rule yet in the community anywhere that forbids
being upset and board members should really be able to be above such
things if they happen in a meeting instead of winding up and blaming
canonical in the end. i have seen enough membership meetings where
discussions or rants occur after someone who brought a bunch of cheering
friends was rejected, it happens and its totally not bound to canonical.

ciao
oli


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 hi,
 Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:12 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan:
 More like:
 Ugh, these two getting upset about the people they manage being
 rejected. Again. How predictable! *eye roll*
 and what forbids them from being like that ?

As far as I can tell: a rubber stamp.  Someone on Dustin's team
applied. Better accept them if we want to avoid another fiasco!

 go ahead, fill the gap in
 their knowledge so they are not upset next time, if things are
 predictable for you you should as well be able to change them.

 i dont think we have a rule yet in the community anywhere that forbids
 being upset and board members should really be able to be above such
 things if they happen in a meeting instead of winding up and blaming
 canonical in the end. i have seen enough membership meetings where
 discussions or rants occur after someone who brought a bunch of cheering
 friends was rejected, it happens and its totally not bound to canonical.

Maybe the EMEA region has more folks with a problem with accepting bad
news, but in over a year on the Americas RMB and 6 months on the DMB,
I have ***NEVER*** seen ANYONE jump into a meeting to criticise the
board's decision...except Canonical employees. Period.  It's like the
upset parent at a kid's baseball game yelling at the umpire because
the kid struck out.

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Marc Cluet
Hi maco,

On 4 Aug 2011, at 15:12, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:

 On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 
 Am 04.08.2011 15:32 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan maco...@gmail.com:
 
 
 On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 hi,
 Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 17:05 -0400 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
 
 Much of this entire discussion was started by Canonical employees
 wanting
 special case treatment for upstream work sponsored by Canonical.
 this is totally untrue if i read the log [1] from the meeting that
 caused you to start this rant against canonical ...
 
 See Robbie  Dustin both second-guessing the DMB here in [2]
 Dustin got upset here [3], when an applicant who said he believed his
 work to be on a separate project [4] did not get accepted.
 There was also the time Robbie criticized the regional board for
 saying Kate hadn't been around long enough yet for membership [5]
 
 [1] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/08/02/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt
 
 [2] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/20/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t21:19
 [3] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t20:00
 [4] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t19:45
 [5] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/12/17/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t04:21
 
 So you identfied robbiew, dustin, jcastro and skaet as people that have a
 differing opinion about contributions than the DMB has, i hope you are aware
 that canonical has nerly 500 employees, why does everyone here seem to think
 that what less than 1% of the company employees say reflects the attitude of
 canonical ?
 
 I'd actually take Kate off that list. In that log, you can see that
 she says she only applied at that time because Robbie  Jono said to.
 I don't think everybody at Canonical shares that opinion, but the
 pattern of Canonical manager gets angry when his employee is
 rejected is pretty obvious to anyone on any of the boards.  Do I
 honestly believe there are some managers at Canonical who think that
 the way membership works is:
 - Hire someone
 - Wait a token number of months
 - Get new hire to write an application
 - New hire writes a meh application
 - Get other team members to all write testimonials because quantity
 beats quality
 - Automatic approval
 
 YES!
 

I think you're depicting here a hyperbole in order to drive your point, let me 
please as one of the people working at Canonical that got rejected by the DMB 
give you my 2 cents.

I joined Canonical in January in order to further enhance cloud and server 
integration through systems integration, which is mainly what I do most of the 
time here, due to this both my colleague Juan (who also got refused) and I have 
been working on several projects which have required acquiring packaging skills 
very quickly, both Juan and I have been tutored by amazing people from the 
community and Canonical in order to gain these skills and be able to contribute 
actively to Ubuntu and to the community in order to make Ubuntu the best server 
and cloud operating system.

Amongst those projects are Orchestra and Ensemble, both are mainly driven by 
Canonical but are Ubuntu projects, as emerging projects they do need some time 
to catch the community interest, so far they've been driving by very sharp 
minds working for Canonical (amongst them Clint Byrum and Gustavo Niemeyer, my 
kudos go to them).

When our manager Dustin believed that we had gathered enough experience in 
order to become Ubuntu members he recommended us to do so, since he believes 
strongly in the community and Ubuntu (as so do we, otherwise we wouldn't be 
working for Canonical), and he gave us his recommendation, not out of being our 
manager but out of believing that we could be very useful community members and 
that after working with us in a day to day basis for months he thought we were 
more than ready for taking this step. I can completely understand Dustin's 
frustration from this point of view and I'm sad that this is resounding 
negatively with you Mackenzie, I do apologise personally (for my contributing 
part of being rejected) for that.

When I stepped in front of the DMB in the irc meeting I was rejected because 
they felt that I didn't interact enough with the Ubuntu community, even if I've 
been interacting directly with upstreams (mcollective, ruby, etc…) and there's 
no community involvement yet with Orchestra, although there's some already with 
Ensemble that I'm very happy about. As you can understand it's a very 
complicated situation to be in.

Please don't get me wrong, I'm very grateful for the DMB and its altruistic 
task, and I'll be the first one to defend its judgements. I learned from the 
DMB meeting and try very hard to downplay the negative parts of it and learn 
constructively from the recommendations, I'll try again to apply for 
contributing developer in the future because I believe I can be useful to the 
community not only when I'm working for Canonical but also 

Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:26 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan:
  If there's an anti-Canonical bias, I still don't see it,

and the discussion we have since yesterday doesnt strike you as possibly
being related to anti canonical bias ?

i can just say that i clearly see it and its scary to see what kind of
assumptions cause it in some cases. 

ciao
oli


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Jeremy Bicha jer...@bicha.net wrote:
 An issue is that applicants are not aware that email is an option and
 it's unclear whether the board considers it to be as valid an option
 as the IRC meeting.
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/ApplicationProcess
 says Attend the meeting as the final requirement.

It's a special-exception thing. The giant backlog that would've
required 2-3 meetings lasting 2-3 hours each prompted moving a few
people to email applications.

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:26 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan:
  If there's an anti-Canonical bias, I still don't see it,

 and the discussion we have since yesterday doesnt strike you as possibly
 being related to anti canonical bias ?

Nope. Just good ol' fashioned anger.

If one of the Claires or Marianne were to apply for membership, they'd
get it in a heartbeat.  At this point, I don't know who is and isn't a
Canonical employee when I see developers' names come up. There's too
many Canonifolk to keep track.  That list I made before? I was shocked
at how many on there were Canonical employees. I expected half the
names to be Canonical and half not. Apparently all the non-Canonical
folks are keeping away.  Can't imagine why.../s

 i can just say that i clearly see it and its scary to see what kind of
 assumptions cause it in some cases.

What, because we're all bloody ANGRY (it's not just me, I'm just the
one who's a big enough BITCH to say anything) at being elected and
then told oh no we didn't REALLY want you to actually MAKE
DECISIONS! ? I don't have a problem with MOST individuals at
Canonical. The ones who think we're supposed to be their pet ponies,
though? HELL YES.

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Marc Cluet marc.cl...@canonical.com wrote:
 Amongst those projects are Orchestra and Ensemble, both are mainly driven by 
 Canonical but are Ubuntu projects, as emerging projects they do need some 
 time to catch the community interest, so far they've been driving by very 
 sharp minds working for Canonical (amongst them Clint Byrum and Gustavo 
 Niemeyer, my kudos go to them).

Dustin has made it clear that he thinks they are part of Ubuntu.  He
and Emmet were supposed to have a discussion post-meeting about where
Orchestra/Ensemble fit, and as mentioned up-thread, the CC is now
going to have to weigh in on which Canonical projects are separate
versus part of Ubuntu.  All we had to go on in Juan's meeting, though,
was this:

persiaI understand that.  Do you believe them to be part of the
same project, or do you see Orchestra as a project to deploy the
output of the Ubuntu project?
negronjl  persia:  separate projects with a very parallel development
and deployment cycle ( after all, Orchestra is mainly managed by the
server/platform team )

If he doesn't think it's part of Ubuntu... we were a bit hand-tied.

 When our manager Dustin believed that we had gathered enough experience in 
 order to become Ubuntu members he recommended us to do so, since he believes 
 strongly in the community and Ubuntu (as so do we, otherwise we wouldn't be 
 working for Canonical), and he gave us his recommendation, not out of being 
 our manager but out of believing that we could be very useful community 
 members and that after working with us in a day to day basis for months he 
 thought we were more than ready for taking this step. I can completely 
 understand Dustin's frustration from this point of view and I'm sad that this 
 is resounding negatively with you Mackenzie, I do apologise personally (for 
 my contributing part of being rejected) for that.

 When I stepped in front of the DMB in the irc meeting I was rejected because 
 they felt that I didn't interact enough with the Ubuntu community, even if 
 I've been interacting directly with upstreams (mcollective, ruby, etc…) and 
 there's no community involvement yet with Orchestra, although there's some 
 already with Ensemble that I'm very happy about. As you can understand it's a 
 very complicated situation to be in.

 Please don't get me wrong, I'm very grateful for the DMB and its altruistic 
 task, and I'll be the first one to defend its judgements. I learned from the 
 DMB meeting and try very hard to downplay the negative parts of it and learn 
 constructively from the recommendations, I'll try again to apply for 
 contributing developer in the future because I believe I can be useful to the 
 community not only when I'm working for Canonical but also on my free time.

 Hope this extended explanation gives you a bit more insight from the other 
 side :)

I don't have a problem with anyone applying or having their
coworker/managers encourage them.  Contributors should all be
encouraging each other. It's the refusal to accept not yet as an
outcome by some of the endorsers that is causing chunks of various
membership boards to burn out. Why not just appoint a board stacked
with the people who will vote the right way?

-- 
Mackenzie Morgan

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:56 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan:
 On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
  hi,
  Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:12 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan:
  More like:
  Ugh, these two getting upset about the people they manage being
  rejected. Again. How predictable! *eye roll*
  and what forbids them from being like that ?
 
 As far as I can tell: a rubber stamp.  Someone on Dustin's team
 applied. Better accept them if we want to avoid another fiasco!
so avoiding the confrontation is better than convincing dustin ?
really, it is dustins problem, not canonicals, dustin could be the
leader of the foobar team that maintains the barfoo software in ubuntu
and would be upset if one of his team members would be rejected.
it has (once again my mantra) *nothing to do with canonical*

ciao
oli


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Laura Czajkowski

 Knowing that there isn't any bad intentions on either side, I share
 the feeling that we get Canonical employees trying to rush through the
 process, and when that gets pushed back on, some key people who walk
 the Canonical/Ubuntu line make it worse by publicly undermining the
 process. That is not helping maintain a healthy relationship between
 community and employees.
 
I think this sums it up well to be honest.  I a bit shocked this thread
has gone on for so long back and forth and I'm pretty sure I'm not the
only one who would like it put to rest.  I think it's safe to say we all
agree there is a problem on what we consider upstream, so I'm sure the
CC will resolve that *soon* for everyone and will make the RMBs and
other boards jobs a lot easier.

Laura

-- 

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/czajkowski
http://www.lczajkowski.com
Skype: lauraczajkowski



-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Chase Douglas
On 08/04/2011 08:52 AM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Chase Douglas
 chase.doug...@canonical.com wrote:
 Realistically, you also can't expect that if you are on a publicly
 elected board that evaluates individuals that there will not be
 disagreements. It is a very personal process. It may not be apparent,
 but it can cause a high level of anxiety for the individual applying.
 This can increase or decrease the volume of the rhetoric. The board
 needs to be able to handle individuals who disagree in a graceful
 manner. Harboring assumptions of ill will and intent is not healthy for
 either the applicants or the board.
 
 What are we supposed to think is up if when a Canonical employee is
 rejected their manager has a hissy fit in the meeting, possibly with
 some rage-tweeting, and then within 12-24 hours someone else in
 Canonical starts up a mailing list thread about changing the way the
 board works or the criteria?  Are we supposed to think it's just a
 coincidence that Jono asks the TB to change the way the DMB works
 (without even CC'ing the DMB) so soon after...twice now?  From the
 outside it sure looks like strings being pulled to fix us.

I confess to not reading the entire IRC logs, but I saw about 5 irc
messages of disagreement at the top of each and then things were left
hanging. One participant tried to state how he felt the policies were
not being applied correctly (about needing a full 6 months for
membership), and this is a perfectly valid point to try to argue. Maybe
he's wrong, but he is within his rights to raise the issue. It's true
that the communication style in the messages may have been sarcastic or
a little heated, but it's an irc channel and par for the course. If
people can't voice disagreements in this fashion, then that's a problem.

Tweets are, as far as I'm concerned, personal messages. If you don't
like them, don't read them. Nothing of consequence should occur through
tweets, and nothing of consequence should happen because of tweets
(outside of really egregious issues that I'll leave aside).

I don't know exactly what Jono or others are attempting to do that make
you think they are trying to fix you. If he did not raise issues with
you before going to the TB, then maybe he should have. However, the TB
is a public board as well, and I don't understand who sets the policy
for how to DMB operates, so perhaps Jono was just trying to make things
better for everyone and thought this was the right way. And as I noted
elsewhere, how one communicates with the DMB is a bit murky since the
only mechanism is a private mailing list which you can't find on
lists.ubuntu.com (I had to google for it by name).

If this all revolves around something Jono is doing, I don't know any
specifics, but as someone who has worked with him I really do believe he
is trying to make things better. There are many historical examples of
how good intentions lead to bad results, and this very well could be one
of them. But please understand that everyone is trying to make things
better.

If you do find yourself in a position where you feel you are being
marginalized by specific people, it's always best to first try to
approach them directly and ask what is going on. I think if you
approached Jono or whoever is making you feel this way, you might find
that he just has a few concerns and you can help resolve them. Or, you
might find maliciousness, in which case you now have evidence and can do
something about it. However, leaving things as they are and assuming ill
will does nobody any good.

-- Chase

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: SRUs for typo fixes in descriptions

2011-08-04 Thread Sebastien Bacher
On jeu., 2011-08-04 at 07:36 -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
 This should also be modified to include:
 
  * ... Apport package hook additions 

Could be not? Or could we move those out of the software binaries? One
complain we often get in reviews and online comments is the new of
updates showing up in update-manager on stable ubuntu versions. It's
quite annoying to download a non trivial amount of binaries just because
there was a one line update in a debug hook.

Do you have datas that showing that most of the bugs are coming from
stable versions? I would rather think that most of the useful technical
feedback is coming from unstable versions (we do turn apport off on
stable series as well), stable user tend to report feedback (things they
like or not, design issues, etc) rather than bugs than benefit from
apport informations usually.

--
Sebastien Bacher


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: DMB: Proposal for a different review process

2011-08-04 Thread Dustin Kirkland
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Mackenzie Morgan maco...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Oliver Grawert o...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 hi,
 Am Donnerstag, den 04.08.2011, 10:12 -0400 schrieb Mackenzie Morgan:
 More like:
 Ugh, these two getting upset about the people they manage being
 rejected. Again. How predictable! *eye roll*
 and what forbids them from being like that ?

 As far as I can tell: a rubber stamp.  Someone on Dustin's team
 applied. Better accept them if we want to avoid another fiasco!
...
 Maybe the EMEA region has more folks with a problem with accepting bad
 news, but in over a year on the Americas RMB and 6 months on the DMB,
 I have ***NEVER*** seen ANYONE jump into a meeting to criticise the
 board's decision...except Canonical employees. Period.  It's like the
 upset parent at a kid's baseball game yelling at the umpire because
 the kid struck out.

This getting a little personal and pejorative.  I'll not take offense,
but I would like to defend my name.

I've been visibly disappointed with a DMB in IRC in two meetings in
the past two months.  In neither case, was I challenging the Board's
decision.  Decisions are for the Board itself.  And while I don't
consider such Boards infallible, arguing with Board decisions is not
productive.  And if you read the logs, that's not what I did.

I raised concerns about three distinct parts of the DMB's review
process, all of which have now shown up in the various threads on the
topic.  I have apologized publicly for any perceived personal attacks.
 I should have brought such concerns to the mailing list rather than
the IRC channel during the meeting.  Now, my concerns were:

 1) The lack of a sufficient quorum to render a decision
  * http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/20/%23ubuntu-meeting.html

 2) A candidate being challenged as to whether his Ubuntu work was
on-the-job (Canonical) work
  * http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/20/%23ubuntu-meeting.html

 3) A candidate's work on a Canonical-sponsored upstream project
(Orchestra, in this case) being discounted as contributions to Ubuntu;
 admittedly the candidate himself fell into a trap question and
clearly stated that Orchestra was not part of Ubuntu (which is
incorrect, btw);  the Board is justified in denying a candidate based
on such a candidate's opinion;  but the general applicability of such
contributions toward Ubuntu membership is an important question
  * http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/07/18/%23ubuntu-meeting.html

To (1), there's been discussion on the list about adjusting meeting
times to improve quorum.  That would be a huge win for everyone.
Woohoo.  \o/

To (2), it seems that there are both Canonical and non-Canonical
employees who believe that Canonical employment should not bias a
decision for or against.  It also seems many people are in agreement
that no such bias exists.  I'm fine with that.  We've had a reasonable
discussion on the topic now.  I'm confident in the Board's ability to
ensure that no such bias exists.  Woohoo.  \o/

To (3), the question of how upstream contributions (e.g. Debian,
Unity, Orchestra, Ensemble) should or shouldn't be considered Ubuntu
contributions has been asked, debated, and discussed.  To me, this
one isn't resolved, and I'd like to see an opinion or even a policy
established by an appropriate authority (DMB?  CC?  TB?).  Still, it's
been a healthy discussion.  A very important one.  One that
desperately needed to happen, I'm afraid.  We'll be a better community
because of it.  Woohoo \o/

-- 
:-Dustin

Dustin Kirkland
Ubuntu Core Developer

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: Understanding the definitions and expectations of our membership processes

2011-08-04 Thread Michael Bienia
On 2011-08-02 11:50:52 -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
 On 07/29/2011 11:24 AM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
  Hola,
  
  On Fri, July 29, 2011 11:01 am, Michael Bienia wrote:
  This leads to the next question: how much do you trust the person
  writing the endorsement?
 
  Of course I trust endorsements from long-standing dev members with a
  great reputation where I trust their ability to judge the packaging
  skills and trustworthiness of the applicant. But should I apply the same
  trust to e.g. a dev member who got accepted himself a month ago?
  
  Why should you not trust that persons judgement unless there is compelling
  reason to believe their judgement should not be trusted.  It seems
  counter-intuitive to okay them for inclusion and then default on your own
  judgement of them by not trusting them without a very good reason to not
  trust them.

I'm not saying that I don't trust them at all, just that I trust them
less than a long-standing member (and only in judging the skills of
others in endorsements). It's about expierence. New members have enough
knowlegde and expierence to give them membership/upload rights and I
expect they continue to learn and gain expierence with time. But do they
have the experience and knowledge to judge others from the beginning
(what to look for; what are common mistakes and did they learn from
them)? This only applies for complete new contributors. When someone
already known in the community would add endorsements in his field of
knowledge, I'd trust them.

  Yes, it's just fine to review an endorsement they give, like any open
  ecosystem would and does currently do, but flat out not trusting their
  judgement seems like you feel they don't belong there in the first place
  which leads to two questions: Why did you okay them them for inclusion at
  all if you aren't going to trust their judgement on skill?  Why would you
  okay him/her for inclusion if you have any reasonable doubt about their
  judgement on skill?
 
 I think I may understand where Michael is coming from. If, for example,
 I endorse someone based on their Python skills, that endorsement should
 be near meaningless since I don't really know Python. If the application
 reviewer doesn't know me, they might not realize this.

Yes, and if e.g. Barry Warsaw would write the same endorsement it would
have a much bigger weight. But if Chase would work on his Python skills
I would have no issue in giving his endorsements the same weight as
Barry's (or any other expierenced Python packager) after some time.

For some people I know their field of expierence and trust their
endorsements in this field  but I don't know it of all people writing
endorsements.

 However, an application reviewer should be able to look up an unknown
 endorser's credentials fairly readily. If you can't find any through a
 glance at the endorser's LP page, Ubuntu wiki page, or Google search,
 then I think it's fair to give up and not count that endorsement.
 
 This can also be extrapolated beyond specific developer skills to more
 subjective criteria like trustworthiness. For example, if an endorser is
 a Core Dev, then their endorsement of the trustworthiness of an
 applicant for upload rights should be valid even if the reviewer and
 endorser don't know each other.

True, and at least for me I'd be easier to build up that trust
relationship to an endorser if mine contact to him is more 'personal'
(like interacting on IRC or mail or even meeting him at a conference)
than just from reading some static wiki pages or LP profiles.

Michael

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


KDE 4.7 packages

2011-08-04 Thread Harald Sitter
markey apachelogger: the KDE 4.7 packages for 11.04 are outstanding.
upgrade was very smooth :)
markey upgraded half of our office, and my home box

Good job ninjas! Thanks for all your awesome!

-- 
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel


Patch pilot report, 2011-08-05.

2011-08-04 Thread Luke Yelavich
* Bug 820773: Uploaded
* lp:~kentb/ubuntu/oneiric/xine-lib/xine-lib-fix-810407/+merge/68306: Previous 
review suggested the bug be filed upstream. No notification of this being done, 
and I couldn't find an upstream bug, so filed a bug, and attached the patch to 
it.
* lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/oneiric/vdk2/fix-for-814377: Uploaded, and gave credit 
where due, as the contributor submitted the patch to debian as well.
* lp:~paulbrianstewart/ubuntu/oneiric/visualvm/813165-formattingTypo: Work is 
fine, and would upload, but it FTBFS due to broken dependencies, and I was 
unable to fix sed dependencies.
* lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/oneiric/vdkxdb2/fix-for-814399: Uploaded.
* Bug 817397: Uploaded
* lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/oneiric/phaseshift/fix-for-755937: Needs fixing, better 
to fix in the autotools macros, but wasn't able to work out which package they 
would come from, at least at a glance.
* setpwc_1.2-3ubuntu1_source.changes: Uploaded
* lp:~scarneiro/ubuntu/oneiric/sweethome3d/fix-for-755950: Uploaded

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] O que a SuperNani tem que a Hostgator não tem?

2011-08-04 Thread Humberto Fraga
Em 3 de agosto de 2011 19:40, Sidney slin...@gmail.com escreveu:
 A propósito, do site antispam.br:
 O que é spam?

 Spam é o termo usado para referir-se aos *e-mails* não solicitados, que
 geralmente são enviados para um grande número de pessoas.

Você mando para pelo menos 4 listas. É no mínimo cross-posting e falta
de educação.

Convém marcar os off-topics no assunto, ajuda a quem tem filtros a não
receber essas mensagens.

-- 
Humberto Fraga
http://lixaonerd.wordpress.com

Sur la tuta tero estis unu lingvo kaj unu parlomaniero. - Gn 11,1

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


[Ubuntu-BR] Radio na intranet

2011-08-04 Thread Andre Cavalcante
Hello people,

É o seguinte. Com o par streamripper/streamtune eu consigo pegar (gravar)
rádio da internet e ouvir no meu PC, usando uma só conexão.
Gostaria de disponibilizar as músicas que já estão no HD como um stream (uma
rádio) dentro da intranet.
Tem como fazer facilmente isso (pensei em fazer o streamripper pegar de um
arquivo, será que funfa)?

André Cavalcante
Caparica, Portugal
Ubuntu User number # 24370
Quer saber sobre Open Source Software? http://sobreoss.blogspot.com
Quer saber mais sobre Espiritismo? http://sobreespiritismo.blogspot.com

Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document
Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos
em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice (
http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office (
http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp).
-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] O que a SuperNani tem que a Hostgator não tem?

2011-08-04 Thread Sidney
Xisberto, menos. Quem decide pra quantas listas vai mandar um post, sou eu.
No máximo vocês moderadores podem reclamar do que foi enviado para *esta*
lista.
Se eu decidi escrever algo para outras listas, e se estou inscrito nelas,
qual o problema?

O assunto tratado é 'revenda de hospedagem de sites dando problema'.
A intenção foi: 'saibam o que está acontecendo antes de contratara essa
empresa'.
Ou seja, a intenção foi servir de aviso.

A listas que enviei *trabalham diretamente* com hospedagens pois são listas
de desenvolvedores web e este é um assunto recorrente nas mesmas.
Com excessão da lista ubuntu.

Recebi respostas da lista ubuntu (não sei se esta ou a outra, quando enviei
primeiramente como Cco). Alguns sugeriram, outros concordaram e tudo normal.
Confesso que o que eu disse não está totalmente relacionado a esta lista,
mas também não está *tão* fora assim.

*E quanto ao OT, me desculpem. *Se olharem a primeira mensagem, verão que
tem um OT. Mas quando enviei a segunda, editei o título não me lembro porque
e tirei o OT de lá e nem percebi.* *Falha minha*.*

Façam o que for cabível: moderem minhas mensagens, excluam minha inscrição,
ou o que quer que esteja previsto.
Então resumindo: como moderadores, por favor, cuidem da lista. Educação é
assunto meu.

T+
Sidney


Em 4 de agosto de 2011 09:02, Humberto Fraga xisbe...@gmail.com escreveu:

 Em 3 de agosto de 2011 19:40, Sidney slin...@gmail.com escreveu:
  A propósito, do site antispam.br:
  O que é spam?
 
  Spam é o termo usado para referir-se aos *e-mails* não solicitados, que
  geralmente são enviados para um grande número de pessoas.

 Você mando para pelo menos 4 listas. É no mínimo cross-posting e falta
 de educação.

 Convém marcar os off-topics no assunto, ajuda a quem tem filtros a não
 receber essas mensagens.

 --
 Humberto Fraga
 http://lixaonerd.wordpress.com

 Sur la tuta tero estis unu lingvo kaj unu parlomaniero. - Gn 11,1

 --
 Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

 Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
 Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


[Ubuntu-BR] Editor de PDF no Ubuntu.

2011-08-04 Thread Renato Alvim
Amigos, por favor, recomendam algum em especial?
Estou traduzindo meu livro e preciso trabalhar direto no pdf, pois o mesmo
já foi revisado.
Obrigado.
-- 
*VEM AÍ A SEGUNDA EDIÇÃO DE LÓGICA DE FORMAÇÃO DE ACORDES*
*Pedidos para o endereço :*
*renatoal...@renatoalvim.com*
*
Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document
Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos
em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice (
http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office (
http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp).
--
*
[]´s
-
*Renato Alvim* - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - *OMB* 32.375
*Sítio* : :www.renatoalvim.com
*blog*:http://renatoalvim.blogs.sapo.pt
Budista - Nam-Myoho-Rengue-Kyo
-
-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Editor de PDF no Ubuntu.

2011-08-04 Thread valdir
Ola Renato, o LibreOffice Draw 3.3.3 Edita PDF, mas é linha a linha.

Valdir Barbosa

 Amigos, por favor, recomendam algum em especial?
 Estou traduzindo meu livro e preciso trabalhar direto no pdf, pois o mesmo
 já foi revisado.
 Obrigado.
 --
 *VEM AÍ A SEGUNDA EDIÇÃO DE LÓGICA DE FORMAÇÃO DE ACORDES*
 *Pedidos para o endereço :*
 *renatoal...@renatoalvim.com*
 *
 Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document
 Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos
 em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice (
 http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office (
 http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp).
 --
 *
 []´s
 -
 *Renato Alvim* - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - *OMB* 32.375
 *Sítio* : :www.renatoalvim.com
 *blog*:http://renatoalvim.blogs.sapo.pt
 Budista - Nam-Myoho-Rengue-Kyo
 -
 --
 Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

 Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
 Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br




-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Radio na intranet

2011-08-04 Thread Marlon
Yooow!
tenta
http://www.havetheknowhow.com/Install-the-software.html

att
--

Marlon Valério
┌─┐
  Problems, lots of Problems
└─┘



Em 4 de agosto de 2011 12:34, Andre Cavalcante andre.d.cavalca...@gmail.com
 escreveu:

 Hello people,

 É o seguinte. Com o par streamripper/streamtune eu consigo pegar (gravar)
 rádio da internet e ouvir no meu PC, usando uma só conexão.
 Gostaria de disponibilizar as músicas que já estão no HD como um stream
 (uma
 rádio) dentro da intranet.
 Tem como fazer facilmente isso (pensei em fazer o streamripper pegar de um
 arquivo, será que funfa)?

 André Cavalcante
 Caparica, Portugal
 Ubuntu User number # 24370
 Quer saber sobre Open Source Software? http://sobreoss.blogspot.com
 Quer saber mais sobre Espiritismo? http://sobreespiritismo.blogspot.com

 Atenção: Este e-mail pode conter anexos no formato ODF (Open Document
 Format)/ABNT (extensões odt, ods, odp, odb, odg). Antes de pedir os anexos
 em outro formato, você pode instalar gratuita e livremente o BrOffice (
 http://www.broffice.org) ou o seguinte Plugin para Microsoft Office (
 http://www.sun.com/software/star/odf_plugin/get.jsp).
 --
 Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

 Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
 Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] O que a SuperNani tem que a Hostgator não tem?

2011-08-04 Thread Zandre Bran
2011/8/4 Sidney slin...@gmail.com:
 Xisberto, menos. Quem decide pra quantas listas vai mandar um post, sou eu. 
 [...]
 [...] Se eu decidi escrever algo para outras listas, e se estou inscrito 
 nelas,
 qual o problema?

Deixa pra lá; mais abaixo; é que deixei este primeiro pensamento
por último e faltou em pouco de paciência; vide [4].

 O assunto tratado é 'revenda de hospedagem de sites dando problema'.
 A intenção foi: 'saibam o que está acontecendo antes de contratara essa
 empresa'.
 Ou seja, a intenção foi servir de aviso.

Tá, se esta resolver processar o Ubuntu por propaganda perjúrio
você ainda estará aqui?

 A listas que enviei *trabalham diretamente* com hospedagens pois são listas
 de desenvolvedores web e este é um assunto recorrente nas mesmas.
 Com excessão da lista ubuntu.

Então; com exceção da lista sobre Ubuntu.

 Recebi respostas da lista ubuntu (não sei se esta ou a outra, quando enviei
 primeiramente como Cco). Alguns sugeriram, outros concordaram e tudo normal.
 Confesso que o que eu disse não está totalmente relacionado a esta lista,
 mas também não está *tão* fora assim.

Sim, está completamente fora de escopo.

 *E quanto ao OT, me desculpem. *Se olharem a primeira mensagem, verão que
 tem um OT. Mas quando enviei a segunda, editei o título não me lembro porque
 e tirei o OT de lá e nem percebi.* *Falha minha*.*

Hummm, novas questões, novas mensagens.

 Façam o que for cabível: moderem minhas mensagens, excluam minha inscrição,
 ou o que quer que esteja previsto.
 Então resumindo: como moderadores, por favor, cuidem da lista. Educação é
 assunto meu.

[4] Putz; fazer não é errado; o errado é ser pego. Desculpe, mas
esta lista não vive sobre um Estado de exceção em que vontades são
impostas por alguns. Todos nos somos responsáveis pelo bem comum. Se
precisa de um estado de policia e tribunais aqui não é este lugar.
Somos um coletivos colaborativo em que nos organizamos. Bom, é isto;
não vai entender mesmo do que estou falando...

 T+
 Sidney

-- []s
-- Zandre.

:: O projeto linuxacessivel.org está concorrendo na premiação do FRIDA.
:: Precisamos de seu voto: http://premiofrida.org/por/projects/view/1527

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] O que a SuperNani tem que a Hostgator não tem?

2011-08-04 Thread Sidney
 Bom, é isto;
 não vai entender mesmo do que estou falando...

Realmente Zandre, poucas vezes consegui entender quando você se expressa
pois você usa bastante filosofia e eu gosto mais de clareza. Você tenta se
impor em palavras bem escolhidas mas não em argumentos lógicos e claros. Não
se ofenda. Serve como crítica construtiva.

Tá, se esta resolver processar o Ubuntu por propaganda perjúrio você
ainda estará aqui?

Estarei aqui até algum moderador optar por me excluir. E isso (do processo)
é um grande exagero. Sem contar que é um motivo novo.

Então; com exceção da lista sobre Ubuntu.

Quando disse exceção me referi a ser um 'assunto recorrente', não a não
fazer parte do escopo.

Hummm, novas questões, novas mensagens.

Sim, falha minha como já dito. E mais uma vez peço desculpas a todos.

 [4] Putz; fazer não é errado; o errado é ser pego.

Nem uma coisa nem outra. O errado é cuidar do que não está sob nossa
competência ou responsabilidade.

Mais uma vez, peço desculpas a todos, inclusive aos moderadores no que diz
respeito à ordem da lista.
Considero o assunto encerrado.



Atenciosamente,
Sidney* http://wmaior.com/?ref_slinstj*


Em 4 de agosto de 2011 17:04, Zandre Bran zandreb...@ubuntu.com escreveu:

 2011/8/4 Sidney slin...@gmail.com:
  Xisberto, menos. Quem decide pra quantas listas vai mandar um post, sou
 eu. [...]
  [...] Se eu decidi escrever algo para outras listas, e se estou inscrito
 nelas,
  qual o problema?

Deixa pra lá; mais abaixo; é que deixei este primeiro pensamento
 por último e faltou em pouco de paciência; vide [4].

  O assunto tratado é 'revenda de hospedagem de sites dando problema'.
  A intenção foi: 'saibam o que está acontecendo antes de contratara essa
  empresa'.
  Ou seja, a intenção foi servir de aviso.

 Tá, se esta resolver processar o Ubuntu por propaganda perjúrio
 você ainda estará aqui?

  A listas que enviei *trabalham diretamente* com hospedagens pois são
 listas
  de desenvolvedores web e este é um assunto recorrente nas mesmas.
  Com excessão da lista ubuntu.

 Então; com exceção da lista sobre Ubuntu.

  Recebi respostas da lista ubuntu (não sei se esta ou a outra, quando
 enviei
  primeiramente como Cco). Alguns sugeriram, outros concordaram e tudo
 normal.
  Confesso que o que eu disse não está totalmente relacionado a esta lista,
  mas também não está *tão* fora assim.

 Sim, está completamente fora de escopo.

  *E quanto ao OT, me desculpem. *Se olharem a primeira mensagem, verão que
  tem um OT. Mas quando enviei a segunda, editei o título não me lembro
 porque
  e tirei o OT de lá e nem percebi.* *Falha minha*.*

Hummm, novas questões, novas mensagens.

  Façam o que for cabível: moderem minhas mensagens, excluam minha
 inscrição,
  ou o que quer que esteja previsto.
  Então resumindo: como moderadores, por favor, cuidem da lista. Educação é
  assunto meu.

 [4] Putz; fazer não é errado; o errado é ser pego. Desculpe, mas
 esta lista não vive sobre um Estado de exceção em que vontades são
 impostas por alguns. Todos nos somos responsáveis pelo bem comum. Se
 precisa de um estado de policia e tribunais aqui não é este lugar.
 Somos um coletivos colaborativo em que nos organizamos. Bom, é isto;
 não vai entender mesmo do que estou falando...

  T+
  Sidney

 -- []s
 -- Zandre.

 :: O projeto linuxacessivel.org está concorrendo na premiação do FRIDA.
 :: Precisamos de seu voto: http://premiofrida.org/por/projects/view/1527

 --
 Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

 Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
 Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] O que a SuperNani tem que a Hostgator não tem?

2011-08-04 Thread Zandre Bran
2011/8/4 Sidney slin...@gmail.com:

Ôlas Sidney.

 Realmente Zandre, poucas vezes consegui entender quando você se expressa
 pois você usa bastante filosofia e eu gosto mais de clareza. Você tenta se
 impor em palavras bem escolhidas mas não em argumentos lógicos e claros. Não
 se ofenda. Serve como crítica construtiva.

 Nem uma coisa nem outra. O errado é cuidar do que não está sob nossa
 competência ou responsabilidade.

Putz novamente. Clareza, lógica, construção de frases? Uma coisa é
uma coisa; outra coisa é outra coisa. Lugar comum. Mas, para dizer,
questão de opinião; sempre achei que neste espaço todos nós fossemos
responsáveis.

 Mais uma vez, peço desculpas a todos, inclusive aos moderadores no que diz
 respeito à ordem da lista.
 Considero o assunto encerrado.

Eu te disse, não te disse :) Novamente:

2011/8/4 Zandre Bran zandreb...@ubuntu.com:
[4] Putz; fazer não é errado; o errado é ser pego. Desculpe, mas
 esta lista não vive sobre um Estado de exceção em que vontades são
 impostas por alguns. Todos nos somos responsáveis pelo bem comum. Se
 precisa de um estado de policia e tribunais aqui não é este lugar.
 Somos um coletivos colaborativo em que nos organizamos. Bom, é isto;
 não vai entender mesmo do que estou falando...

-- []s
-- Zandre.

:: O projeto linuxacessivel.org está concorrendo na premiação do FRIDA.
:: Precisamos de seu voto: http://premiofrida.org/por/projects/view/1527

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] O que a SuperNani tem que a Hostgator não tem?

2011-08-04 Thread Sidney
Ok colega.
Vou encaminhar a mensagem para análise.
Fim de papo.
;-)


Em 4 de agosto de 2011 19:21, Zandre Bran zandreb...@ubuntu.com escreveu:

 2011/8/4 Sidney slin...@gmail.com:

 Ôlas Sidney.

  Realmente Zandre, poucas vezes consegui entender quando você se expressa
  pois você usa bastante filosofia e eu gosto mais de clareza. Você tenta
 se
  impor em palavras bem escolhidas mas não em argumentos lógicos e claros.
 Não
  se ofenda. Serve como crítica construtiva.
 
  Nem uma coisa nem outra. O errado é cuidar do que não está sob nossa
  competência ou responsabilidade.

 Putz novamente. Clareza, lógica, construção de frases? Uma coisa é
 uma coisa; outra coisa é outra coisa. Lugar comum. Mas, para dizer,
 questão de opinião; sempre achei que neste espaço todos nós fossemos
 responsáveis.

  Mais uma vez, peço desculpas a todos, inclusive aos moderadores no que
 diz
  respeito à ordem da lista.
  Considero o assunto encerrado.

 Eu te disse, não te disse :) Novamente:

 2011/8/4 Zandre Bran zandreb...@ubuntu.com:
 [4] Putz; fazer não é errado; o errado é ser pego. Desculpe, mas
  esta lista não vive sobre um Estado de exceção em que vontades são
  impostas por alguns. Todos nos somos responsáveis pelo bem comum. Se
  precisa de um estado de policia e tribunais aqui não é este lugar.
  Somos um coletivos colaborativo em que nos organizamos. Bom, é isto;
  não vai entender mesmo do que estou falando...

 -- []s
 -- Zandre.

 :: O projeto linuxacessivel.org está concorrendo na premiação do FRIDA.
 :: Precisamos de seu voto: http://premiofrida.org/por/projects/view/1527

 --
 Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

 Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
 Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] O que a SuperNani tem que a Hostgator não tem?

2011-08-04 Thread Anderson
Meninos, desculpem eu me intrometer... mas será que podemos finalizar
isso? Isso não vai levar a lugar nenhum. Todos nós erramos e um
pouquinho de tolerancia e compreensão não fariam mal a nossa lista, tá?
Vamos tocar o barco pra frente.

Inté.
Anderson

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] O que a SuperNani tem que a Hostgator não tem?

2011-08-04 Thread Zandre Bran
2011/8/4 Anderson naufrago...@gmail.com:
 Meninos, desculpem eu me intrometer... mas será que podemos finalizar
 isso? Isso não vai levar a lugar nenhum. Todos nós erramos e um
 pouquinho de tolerancia e compreensão não fariam mal a nossa lista, tá?
 Vamos tocar o barco pra frente.

Concordo e fico feliz que o google ++ tenha se encerrado.

 Inté.
 Anderson

-- []s
-- Zandre.

:: O projeto linuxacessivel.org está concorrendo na premiação do FRIDA.
:: Precisamos de seu voto: http://premiofrida.org/por/projects/view/1527

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] O que a SuperNani tem que a Hostgator não tem?

2011-08-04 Thread Sidney
Todos nós ficamos.
;-)

Sidney Lins


Em 4 de agosto de 2011 20:07, Zandre Bran zandreb...@ubuntu.com escreveu:

 2011/8/4 Anderson naufrago...@gmail.com:
  Meninos, desculpem eu me intrometer... mas será que podemos finalizar
  isso? Isso não vai levar a lugar nenhum. Todos nós erramos e um
  pouquinho de tolerancia e compreensão não fariam mal a nossa lista, tá?
  Vamos tocar o barco pra frente.

 Concordo e fico feliz que o google ++ tenha se encerrado.

  Inté.
  Anderson

 -- []s
 -- Zandre.

 :: O projeto linuxacessivel.org está concorrendo na premiação do FRIDA.
 :: Precisamos de seu voto: http://premiofrida.org/por/projects/view/1527

 --
 Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

 Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
 Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] O que a SuperNani tem que a Hostgator não tem?

2011-08-04 Thread Zandre Bran
2011/8/4 Sidney slin...@gmail.com:
 Todos nós ficamos.
 ;-)

1++ xD E vamos em frente Sidney =P

 Sidney Lins

-- []s
-- Zandre.

:: O projeto linuxacessivel.org está concorrendo na premiação do FRIDA.
:: Precisamos de seu voto: http://premiofrida.org/por/projects/view/1527

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


[Ubuntu-BR] Thunderbird 5

2011-08-04 Thread cesar
Pessoal, tem como fazer backup das configuracoes do thunderbird? Ou, 
caso nao tenha, apenas de alguma pasta (rascunho)?


Uso ubuntu 11.04 (x86).

Abs,
Cesar

--
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


[Ubuntu-BR] Um shellscript para a criação de audiolivros

2011-08-04 Thread Luciano de Souza

Caros,

Desejo converter um arquivo de texto em audiolivro. Para tanto criei um 
shellscript, mas ele dá erro na linha: for file in $tmp_shelf/*


#!/bin/bash

#Audioshelf

speed=260
amplitude=140
voice=pt-br
split=20
quality=128
tmp_shelf=/tmp/audioshelf

open()
{
mkdir $tmp_shelf
}

create()
{
espeak -f ./$1 -w $tmp_shelf/$1 -v $voice -s $speed -a $amplitude 
--split=$split

}

convert()
{
for file in $tmp_shelf/*
do
lame $file $file.mp3 -b $quality
done

}

convert

O que poderia estar errado. Não tenho dúvidas quanto à sintaxe de espeak 
e de lame e, de qualquer modo, o Bash diz que o erro encontra-se na 
linha que mencionei.


Luciano

--
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Thunderbird 5

2011-08-04 Thread Humberto Fraga
Em 4 de agosto de 2011 20:33, cesar
cesar.de.araujo.ferre...@gmail.com escreveu:
 Pessoal, tem como fazer backup das configuracoes do thunderbird? Ou, caso
 nao tenha, apenas de alguma pasta (rascunho)?


Oi, cesar, o que você já tentou fazer até agora?


-- 
Humberto Fraga
http://lixaonerd.wordpress.com

Sur la tuta tero estis unu lingvo kaj unu parlomaniero. - Gn 11,1

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Thunderbird 5

2011-08-04 Thread Marlon
copia a pasta .thunderbird inteira...vem tudo
--

Marlon Valério
┌─┐
  Problems, lots of Problems
└─┘



Em 4 de agosto de 2011 22:08, Humberto Fraga xisbe...@gmail.com escreveu:

 Em 4 de agosto de 2011 20:33, cesar
 cesar.de.araujo.ferre...@gmail.com escreveu:
  Pessoal, tem como fazer backup das configuracoes do thunderbird? Ou, caso
  nao tenha, apenas de alguma pasta (rascunho)?
 

 Oi, cesar, o que você já tentou fazer até agora?


 --
 Humberto Fraga
 http://lixaonerd.wordpress.com

 Sur la tuta tero estis unu lingvo kaj unu parlomaniero. - Gn 11,1

 --
 Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

 Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
 Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br

-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Um shellscript para a criação de audiolivros

2011-08-04 Thread Fabiano Barros
tente mudar como abaixo pra vc ver a saida da variavel file.


convert()
{
for file in $tmp_shelf/*
do
 echo $file
done

}






2011/8/4 Luciano de Souza luchya...@gmail.com

 Caros,

 Desejo converter um arquivo de texto em audiolivro. Para tanto criei um
 shellscript, mas ele dá erro na linha: for file in $tmp_shelf/*

 #!/bin/bash

 #Audioshelf

 speed=260
 amplitude=140
 voice=pt-br
 split=20
 quality=128
 tmp_shelf=/tmp/audioshelf

 open()
 {
 mkdir $tmp_shelf
 }

 create()
 {
 espeak -f ./$1 -w $tmp_shelf/$1 -v $voice -s $speed -a $amplitude
 --split=$split
 }

 convert()
 {
 for file in $tmp_shelf/*
 do
 lame $file $file.mp3 -b $quality
 done

 }

 convert

 O que poderia estar errado. Não tenho dúvidas quanto à sintaxe de espeak e
 de lame e, de qualquer modo, o Bash diz que o erro encontra-se na linha que
 mencionei.

 Luciano

 --
 Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: 
 http://www.ubuntu-br.org/**comecehttp://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

 Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
 Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-brhttps://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br




-- 
Fabiano Barros
Cel.: 55 15 9715-8004
barrosfabi...@gmail.com
-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Thunderbird 5

2011-08-04 Thread Fernando Correa da Conceição

On 04-08-2011 20:33, cesar wrote:
Pessoal, tem como fazer backup das configuracoes do thunderbird? Ou, 
caso nao tenha, apenas de alguma pasta (rascunho)?


Uso ubuntu 11.04 (x86).

Abs,
Cesar

Dentro da pasta home do usuário tem uma pasta com o nome .thunderbird, 
todas as mensagens e configurações para um usuário estão dentro dela. 
Você pode, por exemplo, salvar ela em algum lugar, reinstalar o ubuntu e 
depois copiar ela de volta para a pasta home do usuário, todas as suas 
mensagens/configurações/complementos estarão a salvo, se é isso que você 
precisa.


--

Fernando Correa da Conceição
www.jaguaribe.net http://www.jaguaribe.net

--
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


Re: [Ubuntu-BR] Ubuntu 11.04 64bits travando.

2011-08-04 Thread Kleryston
Comigo acontece o mesmo: trava ao tentar sair do descanso de tela. Alguém já tem
alguma sugestão?


-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


[Ubuntu-BR] Dúvidas sobre o UNITU!

2011-08-04 Thread Ksatrya_Linux
Bom dia grandes cabeças deste forum!

Sempre fui um grande usuário e admirador do Gnome e ainda não consegui me
acostumar com o unity, tem recursos que eu ainda não consegui me adaptar vou
dar dois exemplos apenas... no gnome eu conseguia aumentar ou diminuir a
quantidade de alternadores de área de trabalho, no unity essa opção eu não
achei com isso fico limitado as 4 que vem por padrão, tenho o costume de
abris város programas e janelas em várias áreas de trabalho por exemplo...
se eu tiver com um navegador aberto em uma área de trabalho costumo abrir
outro em outra área de trabalho para outro tipo de navegação e pesquisa, no
unity isso não é possível se eu tiver com um navegador em uma área de
trabalho e for para a 3ª área de trabalho quando eu pretendo abrir outro
navegtador ele não aceita pois já tem um navegador aberto e minha esposa e
meu pai já estão viciados com este recurso e eles consideram esse recurso
tão maravilhoso que não pretendem voltar mais para o Windows devido a
pobreza de espaço para trabalhar. Já pesquisei muito e não encontrei nada na
net que apresente uma maneira de se familiarizar com o Unity, peço aqui a
ajuda de vocês. Abraços,

Kishatrya tux
-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


[Ubuntu-be] Report IRC meeting August 4, 2011

2011-08-04 Thread Jurgen Gaeremyn
participants (in random order): pvandewyngaerde, woutervddn, jurgentje,
ehj, clamam
== Events ==
=== Past events ===
=== Upcoming events ===
events between brackets: might not be tackled in this meeting - on the
page as a reminder.
   * 2011-09-17
[[http://wiki.softwarefreedomday.org/2011/Belgium/Genk/Ubuntu-be%20Team%20Limburg?highlight=%28\bCategoryTeam2011\b%29
| SFD - Genk]]: in cooperation with Library - digitale week with
Ubuntu presentation. (maintainer: Claudio Mamarella)
   * 2011-09-17 SFD - brussels: ehj is looking to have a keysigning
party. Interacts well with the freedom not fear manifestation too.
* (LanForce: 2012-04-06 to 2012-04-08) see
[[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BelgianTeam/IrcMeetings/Reports?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=ubuntu-be-irc-meeting-2011-06-23-report.txt
| report 2011-06-23]] for details
 *  Rock Ternat: 2011-10-7 and 8: This year we probably won't be
able to participate due to contracts already being made. They are
sympathetic to the ideology and suggest we apply for next year. (ideas: 
multiseat computer - Proximus offering online connection?)
=== Worth mentioning ===
* computer club Linux babbel (www.linuxbabbel.be) from Izegem often
talks about Ubuntu (among others)
== Promotion ==
=== Running projects ===
* Roll-Ups: status (maintainer: Jurgen Gaeremyn) - still running.
Nothing happened (comparing prices).

Next meeting: August 18 - 21h00

-- 
ubuntu-be mailing list / mailto:ubuntu-be@lists.ubuntu.com

Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-be


PulseAudio не помогает рестарт

2011-08-04 Thread Тарас Перебейносов
Включил в Banshee Sleep Timer, музыку он выключил. Но после этого звук
вообще пропал.
pulseaudio -k
killall pulseaudio
не дают результата.

Что еще можно сделать с pulseaudio чтобы начисто его ребутнуть? Ребутить
комп не хочется - это совсем уж не юниксвей)
-- 
ubuntu-ru mailing list
ubuntu-ru@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ru


Re: PulseAudio не помогает рестарт

2011-08-04 Thread wrt

04.08.2011 22:29, Тарас Перебейносов пишет:

sudo alsa force-reload
pulseaudio -k
killall banshee
не помогли

сначала не помогли)))
после порядка 10 попыток перебирания этих команд заработало) сначала 
звук заикался, потом прочихался



4 августа 2011 г. 22:21 пользователь Тарас Перебейносов 
taras.perebeyno...@gmail.com mailto:taras.perebeyno...@gmail.com 
написал:


Включил в Banshee Sleep Timer, музыку он выключил. Но после этого
звук вообще пропал.
pulseaudio -k
killall pulseaudio
не дают результата.

Что еще можно сделать с pulseaudio чтобы начисто его ребутнуть?
Ребутить комп не хочется - это совсем уж не юниксвей)



Я в таких случаях пользуюсь htop
Можно делать поиск, убивать процессы, повышать и понижать 
приоритет(+можно смотреть кто жрет память и проц).
-- 
ubuntu-ru mailing list
ubuntu-ru@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ru


Re: [Bug 820023] Re: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed toinstall/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script dipost-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2011-08-04 Thread Fendervr
Hello Ursula,
many thanks in advance for your help.
Here you have the information requested:

1) Can you provide the file /etc/init/nmbd.conf ?

it is attached

2) Run the following commands and paste the output here:
 $ testparm -s --parameter-name='disable netbios' 2/dev/null
 $ echo $?
and
 $ install -o root -g root -m 755 -d /var/run/samba
 $ echo $?

This is all what I do on my console (ccl@ccl-HP-Pavilion-dv6-Notebook-PC
is my user)

ccl@ccl-HP-Pavilion-dv6-Notebook-PC:~$ testparm -s --parameter-name='disable 
netbios' 2/dev/null
No
ccl@ccl-HP-Pavilion-dv6-Notebook-PC:~$ echo $?
1
ccl@ccl-HP-Pavilion-dv6-Notebook-PC:~$ install -o root -g root -m 755 -d 
/var/run/samba
ccl@ccl-HP-Pavilion-dv6-Notebook-PC:~$ echo $?
0

at the very start before executing waht you asked I opened a copy of your mail 
from Ubuntu (I have at the moment a dual boot notebook and I save my mail on 
the Windows part) and had a new bug recorded as Bug 820785.
I believe that the two bugs are linked.

Best Regards

Claudio Pellizzaro


- Original Message - 
From: Ursula Junque 820...@bugs.launchpad.net
To: cpe...@tiscali.it
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 5:40 PM
Subject: [Bug 820023] Re: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed 
toinstall/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script dipost-installation ha 
restituito lo stato di errore 1


Hello!

Thanks for your time reporting this bug. I'd like to ask a few things in
order to understand your issue:

1) Can you provide the file /etc/init/nmbd.conf ?
2) Run the following commands and paste the output here:
 $ testparm -s --parameter-name='disable netbios' 2/dev/null
 $ echo $?
and
 $ install -o root -g root -m 755 -d /var/run/samba
 $ echo $?

After providing the information, please set the bug status to 'New' so
it won't expire.

Thanks!

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820023

Title:
  package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: il
  sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo
  stato di errore 1

Status in “samba” package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  I could not connect to a Windows printer shared. I tra ti remove and
  reinstalli samba  smbfs with sudo apt-get install samba smbfs.

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
  Package: samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.47-generic-pae 2.6.38.8
  Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic-pae i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Tue Aug  2 22:23:28 2011
  ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha 
restituito lo stato di errore 1
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007.1)
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   nautilus 1:2.32.2.1-0ubuntu13
   gvfs 1.8.0-0ubuntu2
  SambaClientRegression: Yes
  SourcePackage: samba
  Title: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: il 
sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di 
errore 1
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-02 (92 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/820023/+subscriptions

** Attachment added: nmbd.conf
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820023/+attachment/2253474/+files/nmbd.conf

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820023

Title:
  package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 subprocess installed post-
  installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/820023/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820785] [NEW] package samba (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2011-08-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

I was opening a pdf file saved in a windows partition (FAT32) to send the 
information requested by Ursula Junque 820...@bugs.launchpad.net related to 
Bug 820023. Selecting text on the file I obtained this error. 
I think that the two bug is linked. Many thanks

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: samba (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.48-generic-pae 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: wl nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Aug  3 11:04:18 2011
ErrorMessage: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha 
restituito lo stato di errore 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007.1)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 nautilus 1:2.32.2.1-0ubuntu13
 gvfs 1.8.0-0ubuntu2
SambaClientRegression: Yes
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il 
sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di 
errore 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-02 (93 days ago)

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 natty
-- 
package samba (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso 
vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820785
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server 
Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820785] Re: package samba (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

2011-08-04 Thread Ubuntu QA's Bug Bot
** Package changed: ubuntu = samba (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820785

Title:
  package samba (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: il
  sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo
  stato di errore 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/820785/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 809753] Re: logwatch bug in postfix filter

2011-08-04 Thread Dave Walker
** Changed in: logwatch (Ubuntu)
Milestone: oneiric-alpha-3 = ubuntu-11.10-beta-1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to logwatch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809753

Title:
  logwatch bug in postfix filter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/logwatch/+bug/809753/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 705691] Re: cobbler-web should include a working configuration and a README file detailing the steps necessary

2011-08-04 Thread Dave Walker
** Changed in: cobbler (Ubuntu)
Milestone: oneiric-alpha-3 = ubuntu-11.10-beta-1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cobbler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705691

Title:
  cobbler-web should include a working configuration and a README file
  detailing the steps necessary

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cobbler/+bug/705691/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820867] [NEW] package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 10

2011-08-04 Thread osnavigator
Public bug reported:

after update i have samba crash

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-33.71-generic 2.6.32.41+drm33.18
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-33-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Aug  4 15:00:13 2011
ErrorMessage: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код 
ошибки 10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20110720.1)
PackageArchitecture: all
RelatedPackageVersions:
 nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.2
 gvfs 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1
SambaClientRegression: Yes
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to install/upgrade: 
подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 10

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820867

Title:
  package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to
  install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation
  возвратил код ошибки 10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/820867/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820867] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 10

2011-08-04 Thread osnavigator
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820867

Title:
  package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to
  install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation
  возвратил код ошибки 10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/820867/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820866] [NEW] ISO install problem: package vlan is missing

2011-08-04 Thread UWP
Public bug reported:

This bug-description is just to get a bit pressure onto the new oneiric
ISO media. The bug I filed here:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/787488

seems to be forgotten. But: this is important for new ISO install media!
The package vlan is mandatory for everyone in Germany who uses a VDSL
modem like me. Otherwise it's not possible to get an internet connection
with Ubuntu! I repeat: The vlan package is IMPORTANT for any install
media! Now is the time, it's almost feature freeze for oneiric! Please:
add the package vlan to the install media! It was a complete mess for me
installing natty without the vlan package! I had to use my phone to get
the vlan package onto my internet machine...

** Affects: vlan (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed


** Tags: cdrom dsl install iso media natty network oneiric ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vlan in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820866

Title:
  ISO install problem: package vlan is missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlan/+bug/820866/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820866] Re: ISO install problem: package vlan is missing

2011-08-04 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
Note: ONLY a VDSL modem -- if you have a router, you don't need this.
But if you're using the routers as modem only (pppoE passthrough), you
absolutely need vlan!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vlan in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820866

Title:
  ISO install problem: package vlan is missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlan/+bug/820866/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820866] Re: ISO install problem: package vlan is missing

2011-08-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Changed in: vlan (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vlan in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820866

Title:
  ISO install problem: package vlan is missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlan/+bug/820866/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820870] [NEW] package postfix 2.8.1-1~lucid1 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 75

2011-08-04 Thread uhilian
Public bug reported:

Configurando postfix (2.8.1-1~lucid1) ...
[: 478: -a: unexpected operator

Postfix configuration was not changed.  If you need to make changes, edit
/etc/postfix/main.cf (and others) as needed.  To view Postfix configuration
values, see postconf(1).

After modifying main.cf, be sure to run '/etc/init.d/postfix reload'.

Running newaliases
newaliases: fatal: bad string length 0  1: mydomain = 
dpkg: erro processando postfix (--configure):
 sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de 
erro 75
Processando gatilhos para libc-bin ...
ldconfig deferred processing now taking place
Erros foram encontrados durante o processamento de:
 postfix
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: postfix 2.8.1-1~lucid1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-33.72-generic-pae 2.6.32.41+drm33.18
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-33-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Aug  3 21:41:09 2011
ErrorMessage: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado 
de saída de erro 75
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100816.1)
SourcePackage: postfix
Title: package postfix 2.8.1-1~lucid1 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo 
script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 75

** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820870

Title:
  package postfix 2.8.1-1~lucid1 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo
  script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 75

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/820870/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820870] Re: package postfix 2.8.1-1~lucid1 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 75

2011-08-04 Thread uhilian
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820870

Title:
  package postfix 2.8.1-1~lucid1 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo
  script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 75

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/820870/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820896] [NEW] freshclam ERROR: Database load killed by signal 11

2011-08-04 Thread Rudi Huber
Public bug reported:

Version Ubuntu: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS
Version ClamAV: ClamAV 0.96.5/13400/

/var/lib/clamav# freshclam
ClamAV update process started at Thu Aug  4 14:15:59 2011
main.cvd is up to date (version: 53, sigs: 846214, f-level: 53, builder: sven)
daily.cld is up to date (version: 13400, sigs: 169438, f-level: 60, builder: 
ccordes)
WARNING: Current functionality level = 58, recommended = 60
Please check if ClamAV tools are linked against the proper version of libclamav
DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq
Downloading bytecode.cvd [100%]
[LibClamAV] ***
[LibClamAV] ***  This version of the ClamAV engine is outdated. ***
[LibClamAV] *** DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq ***
[LibClamAV] ***
ERROR: Database load killed by signal 11
ERROR: Failed to load new database: No viruses detected

Update Virus Database ends in an Error.

** Affects: clamav (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

+ Version Ubuntu: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS
+ Version ClamAV: ClamAV 0.96.5/13400/
+ 
  /var/lib/clamav# freshclam
  ClamAV update process started at Thu Aug  4 14:15:59 2011
  main.cvd is up to date (version: 53, sigs: 846214, f-level: 53, builder: sven)
  daily.cld is up to date (version: 13400, sigs: 169438, f-level: 60, builder: 
ccordes)
  WARNING: Current functionality level = 58, recommended = 60
  Please check if ClamAV tools are linked against the proper version of 
libclamav
  DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq
  Downloading bytecode.cvd [100%]
  [LibClamAV] ***
  [LibClamAV] ***  This version of the ClamAV engine is outdated. ***
  [LibClamAV] *** DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq ***
  [LibClamAV] ***
  ERROR: Database load killed by signal 11
  ERROR: Failed to load new database: No viruses detected
+ 
+ Update Virus Database ends in an Error.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820896

Title:
  freshclam ERROR: Database load killed by signal 11

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/820896/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint server-o-drop-vmbuilder] Drop VMBuilder?

2011-08-04 Thread Scott Moser
Blueprint changed by Scott Moser:

Whiteboard changed:
  Work Items:
  [mvo] move do-release-upgrade build/testing to live-build: TODO
- [smoser] move oneiric cloud images build to live-build: TODO
+ [utlemming] move oneiric cloud images build to live-build: DONE
  [mdeslaur] vm-tools to live-build or something else: DONE
  [davewalker] Investigate CCA requirement for vmbuilder: DONE
  discuss with cody what is appropriate release to target for 11.10: TODO
  [davewalker] update web/wiki documentation to indicate deprecation of 
vmbuilder: TODO
  mailng list or blog request for upstream vmbuilder maintainer: TODO
  [nijaba] talk to canonical legal regarding droping CCA: TODO
  [davewalker] add deprecated warning on vm-builder: TODO
  
  Notes:
  etherpad: http://pad.ubuntu.com/uds-o-server-o-drop-vmbuilder
  etherpad-history: 
http://pad.ubuntu.com/ep/pad/view/uds-o-server-o-drop-vmbuilder/latest

-- 
Drop VMBuilder?
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-o-drop-vmbuilder

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint server-o-cloud-images] improvements to Ubuntu Cloud images and cloud-init

2011-08-04 Thread Scott Moser
Blueprint changed by Scott Moser:

Whiteboard changed:
  Work Items:
  [smoser] rename uec-images.ubuntu.com to cloud-images.ubuntu.com: DONE
  [smoser] add chef support to cloud-init: DONE
  [smoser] support system or static Eucalyptus modes in cloud-init (bug 
761847): DONE
  [smoser] document 'instance-data' hostname and setup in eucalyptus (bug 
761847): DONE
  [smoser] make sure cloud-init works on openstack and lxc (bug 800824) : DONE
- [smoser] cloud-init fix lxc and resizefs (bug 800856): TODO
+ [smoser] cloud-init fix lxc and resizefs (bug 800856): DONE
  make sure static networking and cloud-init works or fix: TODO
  configure networking through cloud config: TODO
  make cloud-init work on debian: TODO
  investigate ovf 2.0: POSTPONED
  re-investigate use of ovf images on vmware: POSTPONED
  
  Notes:
  etherpad: http://pad.ubuntu.com/uds-o-server-o-cloud-images
  etherpad-history: 
http://pad.ubuntu.com/ep/pad/view/uds-o-server-o-cloud-images/latest

-- 
improvements to Ubuntu Cloud images and cloud-init
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-o-cloud-images

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820936] [NEW] Virtual server setup breaks Rewrite Rules

2011-08-04 Thread Thomas Schweikle
Public bug reported:

Default setup for Apache2 is with:
Virtualhost *:80
   ...
/Virtualhost

there are web applications within /etc/apache2/conf.d any rewrite-
rules given there are ignored, because they are outside the scope for
the virtual server running on port 80.

Two solutions:
1. Move all Location definitions for the default virtual server to some 
directory to be included within
Virtualhost *:80
   include Location definitions
/Virtualhost

or

2. remove Virtualhost *:80 /Virtualhost entirely for the default
server.

It is more than only annoying having various rewrite rules never
touched, just because they not located at the right place!

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: apache2 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-33.71-server 2.6.32.41+drm33.18
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-33-server x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Aug  4 15:38:42 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 
(20100816.2)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: apache2

** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820936

Title:
  Virtual server setup breaks Rewrite Rules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/820936/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820936] Re: Virtual server setup breaks Rewrite Rules

2011-08-04 Thread Thomas Schweikle
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820936

Title:
  Virtual server setup breaks Rewrite Rules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/820936/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint server-o-ensemble-conference-talks] Ensemble Conference Talks

2011-08-04 Thread Robbie Williamson
Blueprint changed by Robbie Williamson:

Whiteboard changed:
  Work Items:
  [bcsaller] Cloud Camp - May 26, 2011 in San Francisco, CA, USA {1}: DONE
  DevOps Day Australia (Taking talk submissions now) - July 22-23rd in 
Melbourne, Australia{2}: POSTPONED
  HotCloud (Poster submissions are due by Monday, May 30, 2011, at 3:00 p.m. 
PDT) - June 14–15 in Portland, OR, USA{3}: POSTPONED
  [bcsaller] DevOps Day Mountain View (Proposal Deadline is 1st of June 2011) - 
June 17-18th in Mountain View{4}: TODO
  Cloud Camp - June 2, 2011 in Boston (Waltham, MA), USA{5}: POSTPONED
  [kirkland] Cloud Camp - June 7, 2011 in New York, USA{6}: DONE
  Velocity BoF Session  (Call closes 11:59pm 06/09/2011 PDT) - June 14th-16th 
in Santa Clara, CA{7}: POSTPONED
  Large Installation System Administration Conference  - (Call closes June 9, 
2011, 11:59 p.m. PDT) - December 4–9, 2011, Boston, MA{8}: POSTPONED
  Ops Camp - June 13, 2011 in Portland, OR, USA{10}: POSTPONED
  [clint-fewbar] Cloud Camp - June 14, 2011 in San Diego, CA, USA{11}: DONE
  Cloud Camp - June 16, 2011 in Seattle, USA{12}: POSTPONED
  CloudCamp - June 20, 2011 in Cincinnati, OH, USA{13}: POSTPONED
  Cloud Computing Expo (Call closes June 30, 2011) - Nov 7-10 in Santa Clara, 
CA {15}: POSTPONED
- [robbie.w] CloudCamp - July 20, 2011 in Austin, TX, USA{18}: TODO
+ [robbie.w] CloudCamp - July 20, 2011 in Austin, TX, USA{18}: POSTPONED
  [clint-fewbar] OSCON Talk: DONE
  [clint-fewbar] OSCON BoF Session  (Call closes 11:59pm 07/22/2011 PDT) - July 
25-29th in Portland, OR{14}: DONE
- LinuxConf AU (Call close Friday 29th July 2011) - January 16-20th Ballarat, 
Australia{18}: TODO
- Cloud Connect 2012 - (Call closes August 5th, 2011) - February 13-16, 2012, 
Silicon Valley, CA{9}: TODO
+ LinuxConf AU (Call close Friday 29th July 2011) - January 16-20th Ballarat, 
Australia{18}: POSTPONED
+ Cloud Connect 2012 - (Call closes August 18th, 2011) - February 13-16, 2012, 
Silicon Valley, CA{9}: TODO
  CloudCamp - September 10, 2011 in Munich, Germany{16}: POSTPONED
  CloudCamp - October 9, 2011 in Cloud Track @ Silicon Valley Code Camp, 
USA{17}: TODO
  
  Links:
  {1} http://www.cloudcamp.org/sf/2011-05-26
  {2} http://devopsdownunder.org/
  {3} http://www.usenix.org/events/hotcloud11/
  {4} http://www.devopsdays.org/events/2011-mountainview/proposals/
  {5} http://www.cloudcamp.org/boston/2011-06-02
  {6} http://www.cloudcamp.org/ny/2011-06-07
  {7} http://velocityconf.com/velocity2011/public/cfp/157
  {8} http://www.usenix.org/events/lisa11/
  {9} http://www.cloudconnectevent.com/santaclara/call-for-papers/
  {10} http://www.opscamp.org/
  {11} http://www.cloudcamp.org/sandiego/2011-06-14
  {12} http://www.cloudcamp.org/seattle/2011-06-16
  {13} http://www.cloudcamp.org/cincinnati/2011-06-20
  {14} http://www.oscon.com/oscon2011/public/cfp/164
  {15} http://cloudcomputingexpo2011west.sys-con.com/general/papers2011w.htm
  {16} http://www.cloudcamp.org/munich/2011-09-10
  {17} http://www.cloudcamp.org/siliconvalley/2011-10-09
  {18} http://cloudcamp-austin-2011-estw.eventbrite.com/
  {19} http://linux.conf.au/programme/papers

-- 
Ensemble Conference Talks
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-o-ensemble-conference-talks

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint server-o-documentation] Improving Ubuntu Server Documentation

2011-08-04 Thread Robbie Williamson
Blueprint changed by Robbie Williamson:

Whiteboard changed:
+ 
  Work Items:
  [jwcampbell] look at build toolchain transition needs to produce something 
similar to docs.openstack.org: TODO
  Look at what we currently have, what needs to change, and plan how we do it: 
TODO
- [robbie.w] look at getting funding for dedicated document resource: TODO
+ [robbie.w] look at getting funding for dedicated document resource: DONE
  Jim or Adam to look at an Ubuntu Open Week-type session regarding additional 
contributions to server docs: TODO
  Server team to identify server resources that could be used to test out 
server documentation configurations for the purpose of documenting them.: TODO

-- 
Improving Ubuntu Server Documentation
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-o-documentation

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820936] Re: Virtual server setup breaks Rewrite Rules

2011-08-04 Thread Thomas Schweikle
Or

3. Change Virtualhost *:80 to Virtualhost _default_:80.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820936

Title:
  Virtual server setup breaks Rewrite Rules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/820936/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820692] Re: package bacula-director-mysql 5.0.3-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-08-04 Thread James Page
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 563039 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563039

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.

This is a known problem when installing bacula - you will need to
install mysql-server first and then install bacula.

This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug
563039, so it is being marked as such.

Any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other
report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find.


** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 563039
   bacula-director-mysql 5.0.1-1ubuntu1 fails to install if mysql-server not 
installed first

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820692

Title:
  package bacula-director-mysql 5.0.3-0ubuntu2 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/820692/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 817187] Re: change in readlink() errno in 2.6.39 and later kernels causes FTBFS for packages with older gnulib

2011-08-04 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Have started a thread upstream to discuss this change.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817187

Title:
  change in readlink() errno in 2.6.39 and later kernels causes FTBFS
  for packages with older gnulib

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/817187/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820953] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.54-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

2011-08-04 Thread Pavel Denisov
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820953

Title:
  package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.54-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade:
  подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки
  1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/820953/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820968] [NEW] nova-objectstore runs as root

2011-08-04 Thread Thierry Carrez
Public bug reported:

Upstart script was not upgraded when nova-objectstore was changed. It
ignores the --uid parameter and therefore runs as root. It needs to be
fixed to drop the --uid stuff and use the common way.

** Affects: nova (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820968

Title:
  nova-objectstore runs as root

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/820968/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


RE: [Bug 810731] Re: MySQL Server installation crashed, now unable to remove MySQL server and Client Binaries

2011-08-04 Thread Corey Gallatin
After doing the update from the command line I still cannot remove or
install MySQL server or the client binaries. After each attempt I am
still getting the message that the software index needs to be rebuilt. I
do the rebuild only to get the same result.

Thanks,
Corey

-Original Message-
From: boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com] On Behalf Of Serge 
Hallyn
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 1:27 AM
To: Corey Gallatin
Subject: [Bug 810731] Re: MySQL Server installation crashed, now unable to 
remove MySQL server and Client Binaries

Thanks for taking the time to submit this bug.

Could you try the following on a terminal:

   sudo apt-get update

And tell us if the problem continues after that?

If it fixes the problem, then I'd next like to look at your
/var/log/apt/term.log and /var/log/dpkg.log of clues as to what went
wrong originally.

** Also affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: mysql-5.1 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810731

Title:
  MySQL Server installation crashed, now unable to remove MySQL server
  and Client Binaries

Status in “mysql-5.1” package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in “software-center” package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Software Center keeps reporting the software index keeps needing to be
  rebuilt.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
  Package: software-center 4.0.4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.46-server 2.6.38.7
  Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-server x86_64
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Jul 14 16:29:35 2011
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 
(20101007)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US:en
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: software-center
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-07-06 (8 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/810731/+subscriptions

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810731

Title:
  MySQL Server installation crashed, now unable to remove MySQL server
  and Client Binaries

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/810731/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820997] [NEW] instances lose public IP

2011-08-04 Thread Russell de Moose
Public bug reported:

Eucalyptus 2.0. Natty 11.04, Lucid 10.04 image for instances

I have a small UEC setup (1 Front-End, 2 NC), and at various points,
instances running on each of the node controllers will lose their public
IP addresses. I can re-associate available IP addresses from my pool
(Managed NO-VLAN) with the instances, but this is a repeated issue. FYI
-

RESERVATION r-4B5E08CB  admin   default
INSTANCEi-357C06B6  emi-0A1B1168172.19.1.2   172.19.1.2 
running0c1.medium   2011-07-29T16:16:36.856Zwebness 
eki-92AE1B4D

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: eucalyptus-common 2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu4.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.46-server 2.6.38.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-server x86_64
.etc.eucalyptus.eucalyptus.cc.conf: CC_NAME=webness
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Aug  4 11:16:19 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 
(20110422)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: eucalyptus
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820997

Title:
  instances lose public IP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/820997/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820997] Re: instances lose public IP

2011-08-04 Thread Russell de Moose
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820997

Title:
  instances lose public IP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/820997/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 739297] Re: Please update nmap: stable upstream version is 5.51

2011-08-04 Thread Jeremy Bicha
** Changed in: nmap (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Low = Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nmap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739297

Title:
  Please update nmap: stable upstream version is 5.51

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nmap/+bug/739297/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 821003] [NEW] UEC Node controller loses connectivity

2011-08-04 Thread Russell de Moose
Public bug reported:

Natty 11.04, UEC (1 front-end, 2 NC), Eucalyptus 2.0, Lucid 10.04 image
for instances

I had a working UEC environment, where the euca-describe-availability-
zones verbose would show the resources of the 2 combined NCs. I have 2
instances running on each NC. Yesterday I could not access the instances
from the 2nd NC, and the CC could not communicate with the NC. They did
not show up after running euca-describe-instances, but the NC DID show
up when running euca_conf --list-nodes, and checking the nodes.list file
in /var/lib/eucalyptus. Several hours later, the same commands (euca-
describe-availability-zones verbose and euca-describe-instances) show
the previously unavailable resources, and now the instances are again
accessible. It seems as if the NC simply disappeared for several hours,
in which time I could still SSH into the NC, CC, and verify that all
services were running.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: eucalyptus-common 2.0.1+bzr1256-0ubuntu4.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.46-server 2.6.38.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-server x86_64
.etc.eucalyptus.eucalyptus.cc.conf: CC_NAME=webness
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Aug  4 12:05:14 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 
(20110422)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: eucalyptus
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821003

Title:
  UEC Node controller loses connectivity

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/821003/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 821003] Re: UEC Node controller loses connectivity

2011-08-04 Thread Russell de Moose
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821003

Title:
  UEC Node controller loses connectivity

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/821003/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 821026] [NEW] package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 1

2011-08-04 Thread reddogs1s
Public bug reported:

package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează starea de
eroare la ieșire 1

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-33.71-generic 2.6.32.41+drm33.18
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-33-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Aug  4 17:24:34 2011
ErrorMessage: subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează 
starea de eroare la ieșire 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100816.1)
PackageArchitecture: all
RelatedPackageVersions:
 nautilus 1:2.30.1-0ubuntu1.2
 gvfs 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1
SambaClientRegression: Yes
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează starea de eroare 
la ieșire 1

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821026

Title:
  package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation
  returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/821026/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 821026] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 1

2011-08-04 Thread reddogs1s
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821026

Title:
  package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation
  returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/821026/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 821047] [NEW] package exim4-config 4.71-3ubuntu1.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 1

2011-08-04 Thread reddogs1s
Public bug reported:

package exim4-config 4.71-3ubuntu1.3 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează starea de
eroare la ieșire 1

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: exim4-config 4.71-3ubuntu1.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-33.71-generic 2.6.32.41+drm33.18
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-33-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Aug  4 20:48:57 2011
ErrorMessage: subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează 
starea de eroare la ieșire 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100816.1)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: exim4
Title: package exim4-config 4.71-3ubuntu1.3 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează starea de eroare 
la ieșire 1

** Affects: exim4 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821047

Title:
  package exim4-config 4.71-3ubuntu1.3 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează starea
  de eroare la ieșire 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/821047/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 821047] Re: package exim4-config 4.71-3ubuntu1.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează starea de eroare la ieșire 1

2011-08-04 Thread reddogs1s
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821047

Title:
  package exim4-config 4.71-3ubuntu1.3 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocesul s-a instalat scriptul post-installation returnează starea
  de eroare la ieșire 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/821047/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820953] Re: package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.54-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

2011-08-04 Thread Ursula Junque
From log (translated):

Setting up mysql-server-5.1 (5.1.54-1ubuntu4) ... 
110 804 17:19:21 [Note] Plugin 'FEDERATED' is disabled. 
110 804 17:19:21 InnoDB: Initializing buffer pool, size = 8.0M 
110 804 17:19:21 InnoDB: Completed initialization of buffer pool 
110 804 17:19:22 InnoDB: Started; log sequence number 0 44 233 
110 804 17:19:22 InnoDB: Starting shutdown ... 
110 804 17:19:27 InnoDB: Shutdown completed; log sequence number 0 44 233 
start: Job failed to start 
invoke-rc.d: initscript mysql, action start failed. 
dpkg: error processing mysql-server-5.1 (- configure): 
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of mysql-server: 
 mysql-server depends on mysql-server-5.1, but: 
  Package mysql-server-5.1 is not configured yet. 
dpkg: error processing mysql-server (- configure): 
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured

** Summary changed:

- package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.54-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: 
подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1
+ package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.54-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820953

Title:
  package mysql-server-5.1 5.1.54-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/820953/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint server-o-ecryptfs-testsuite] Ecryptfs testsuite

2011-08-04 Thread Serge Hallyn
Blueprint changed by Serge Hallyn:

Whiteboard changed:
  Status: not yet started
  
  Work Items:
  [jjohansen] refresh xattr-based long filenames patchset: TODO
  [kirkland] look for (previously written for a CVE) re-encrypt-all-files 
script: TODO
  [kirkland] write some basic mount/write/unmount/read generic files (random 
binary, text, small, big): TODO
  [kirkland] test failure cases too (long file names, bad data in underlying 
filesystem: TODO
- [serge-hallyn] stress testing (check phoronix for ecryptfs tests): TODO
+ [serge-hallyn] stress testing (check phoronix for ecryptfs tests): DONE

-- 
Ecryptfs testsuite
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-o-ecryptfs-testsuite

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 503138] Re: Lucid Natty, KVM, After kernel message hrtimer: interrupt too slow.... the SMP kvm guest becomes slow.

2011-08-04 Thread iMac
I am seeing this bug on a Lucid box running on ESX 3.5 Update 4.
Running 2.6.32-33-generic-pae 32bit guest (linux-image-generic-pae)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503138

Title:
  Lucid  Natty, KVM, After kernel message  hrtimer: interrupt too
  slow the SMP kvm guest becomes slow.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kvm/+bug/503138/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 821077] [NEW] Apache2 segfault with SSLProxyMachineCertificateFile (upstream patch not applied in ubuntu)

2011-08-04 Thread Loic
Public bug reported:

When I use SSLProxyMachineCertificateFile in my apache configuration,
the service crashes with a segfault on startup.

Here's the error.log contents with LogLevel debug :

[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [info] Init: Seeding PRNG with 648 bytes of entropy
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [info] Loading certificate  private key of 
SSL-aware server
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_pphrase.c(470): unencrypted RSA 
private key - pass phrase not required
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [info] Init: Generating temporary RSA private keys 
(512/1024 bits)
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [info] Init: Generating temporary DH parameters 
(512/1024 bits)
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [info] Init: Initializing (virtual) servers for SSL
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(415): Creating new SSL 
context (protocols: SSLv2, SSLv3, TLSv1)
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(548): Configuring client 
authentication
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(1143): CA certificate: 
[hidden for privacy]
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(636): Configuring 
certificate revocation facility
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(966): loaded 1 client 
certs for SSL proxy
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [info] Configuring server for SSL protocol
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(415): Creating new SSL 
context (protocols: SSLv3, TLSv1)
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(548): Configuring client 
authentication
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(1143): CA certificate:  
[hidden for privacy]
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(611): Configuring 
permitted SSL ciphers [HIGH:MEDIUM:!ADH]
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(636): Configuring 
certificate revocation facility
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(370): Configuring TLS 
extension handling
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(742): Configuring RSA 
server certificate
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(781): Configuring RSA 
server private key
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(415): Creating new SSL 
context (protocols: SSLv2, SSLv3, TLSv1)
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(548): Configuring client 
authentication
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(1143): CA certificate:  
[hidden for privacy]
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(636): Configuring 
certificate revocation facility
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [debug] ssl_engine_init.c(966): loaded 1 client 
certs for SSL proxy
[Thu Aug 04 20:35:05 2011] [info] mod_ssl/2.2.14 compiled against Server: 
Apache/2.2.14, Library: OpenSSL/0.9.8k

Googleing this issue, I found a very similar story leading to a patch by
the apache team (see
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39915 and
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c?r1=417988r2=417987pathrev=417988).

I ran apt-get source apache2 on my server and compared the included
ssl_engine_init.c with the patched version from the svn above. I confirm
this patch is not included the current package (as available today in
ubuntu repositories for Lucid).

I would happily patch my source, compile and test to confirm it fixes
the issue, but that's a bit beyond my Ubuntu knowledge (especially the
compile and rebuild package before apt-get-installing the fixed
version part).

BTW : please consider publishing the fixed version in Lucid
repositories, as I cannot use a non-LTS release.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: apache2 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-30.59-generic-pae 2.6.32.29+drm33.13
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-30-generic-pae i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Aug  4 20:21:18 2011
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 
(20100816.2)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: apache2

** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821077

Title:
  Apache2 segfault with SSLProxyMachineCertificateFile (upstream patch
  not applied in ubuntu)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/821077/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 821077] Re: Apache2 segfault with SSLProxyMachineCertificateFile (upstream patch not applied in ubuntu)

2011-08-04 Thread Loic
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821077

Title:
  Apache2 segfault with SSLProxyMachineCertificateFile (upstream patch
  not applied in ubuntu)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/821077/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 503138] Re: Lucid Natty, KVM, After kernel message hrtimer: interrupt too slow.... the SMP kvm guest becomes slow.

2011-08-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503138

Title:
  Lucid  Natty, KVM, After kernel message  hrtimer: interrupt too
  slow the SMP kvm guest becomes slow.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kvm/+bug/503138/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 820540] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-08-04 Thread Emmanuel Clerc
Hi Ursula,

here is the output of the requested commands.

The configuration seems successful.
 
$ sudo cp /usr/share/samba/smb.conf /etc/samba/smb.conf
[sudo] password for eclerc: 

$ sudo dpkg --configure -a
Setting up samba-common (2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7) ...

Setting up smbclient (2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7) ...
Setting up samba-common-bin (2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7) ...

Setting up samba (2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7) ...
smbd start/running, process 2974
nmbd start/running, process 2983

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820540

Title:
  package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.7 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/820540/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 637114] Re: Large multiget requests randomly broken

2011-08-04 Thread Michael Koziarski
The cause of this is a broken back port of the upstream change set:

https://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/d9cd01ede97f4145af9781d448c62a3318952719

That changeset uses strncmp whereas the .diff file uses strcmp


++if (ptr - c-rcurr  100 ||
++  strcmp(ptr, get )  strcmp(ptr, gets )) {
++conn_set_state(c, conn_closing);
++return 1;
++}

Given that the string being compared contains either get HUGE KEY or
gets HUGE KEYS the check in the ubuntu diff will *always* return
false.

Simply correcting that back port appears to solve the problem for us.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to memcached in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637114

Title:
  Large multiget requests randomly broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/memcached/+bug/637114/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 782614] Re: make configuring DNSSEC validation easier

2011-08-04 Thread Neal McBurnett
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782614

Title:
  make configuring DNSSEC validation easier

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/782614/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 821183] [NEW] winbind won't connect to server during startup

2011-08-04 Thread Mike E.
Public bug reported:

I'm trying to use winbind to authenticate users from a Samba 3.5 PDC
(CentOS) and I can't login to a domain account after (re)start.  If I
login to a local account and run wbinfo -u, the only users listed are
the BUILTIN accounts.  If I then restart winbind and run wbinfo -u
again, I receive the full list of domain users (and can from then on,
login as a domain user).  I think this has something to due with the
fact that winbind is being started before I have a network connection
(wireless).  I can wait any length of time (15+ minutes) or login with a
local user to where I know that I have a network connection, but still I
cannot get winbind to behave until it is restarted.  Can anyone help me
track this down?

$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 11.04
Release:11.04

$ apt-cache policy winbind
winbind:
  Installed: 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3
  Candidate: 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3
  Version table:
 *** 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-updates/main amd64 
Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-security/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Packages

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: samba winbind

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821183

Title:
  winbind won't connect to server during startup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/821183/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 769354] Re: elinks accepts self-signed ssl certificates without warning

2011-08-04 Thread Steve Beattie
** This bug has been flagged as a security vulnerability

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to elinks in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769354

Title:
  elinks accepts self-signed ssl certificates without warning

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elinks/+bug/769354/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Blueprint server-o-monitoring] Improve monitoring for the Server

2011-08-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Blueprint changed by Clint Byrum:

Whiteboard changed:
  Work Items for oneiric-alpha-2:
  [gandelman-a] MIR for liboping-dev for collectd (bug 801774) : DONE
  [serge-hallyn] MIR for protobuf-c for collectd (bug 801735): DONE
  [andreserl] MIR for libganglia1-dev for collectd (bug801615) : DONE
  [andreserl] MIR for libconfuse-dev (Build-Dep for ganglia) (bug 801648): DONE
  Package collectd-web plugin: TODO
  
  Work Items:
  [smoser] MIR for libtokyocabinet-dev for collectd (bug 699734): DONE
  [smoser] MIR for libtokyotyrant-dev for collectd (bug 811338): INPROGRESS
  [davewalker] MIR for collectd for collectd (bug 801721): BLOCKED
  [clint-fewbar] MIR for libyajl-dev for collectd (was completed by doko as 
part of component mismatches): DONE
- [clint-fewbar] Drop libhal-dev in collectd : INPROGRESS
+ [clint-fewbar] Drop libhal-dev in collectd (collectd FTBFS in oneiric): 
BLOCKED
  
  Add nagios restart trigger: TODO
  Write base plugin for nagios mcollective plugin: TODO
  Add Ubuntu Cloud support to nagios mcollective plugin: TODO
  Add UEC support to nagios mcollective plugin: TODO
  Add DNS stack support to nagios mcollective plugin: TODO
  Add LAMP stack support to nagios mcollective plugin: TODO
  Add mail stack support to nagios mcollective plugin: TODO
  Add postgres to nagios mcollective plugin: TODO
  Add cups stack to nagios mcollective plugin: TODO
  Add samba stack to nagios mcollective plugin: TODO
  Add Tomcat stack to nagios mcollective plugin: TODO

-- 
Improve monitoring for the Server
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-o-monitoring

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: gnome-panel

2011-08-04 Thread Pierre Lusardi
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:50:52 +0200
Michel mich...@club-internet.fr wrote:

 
 Bonjour,
 
 J'ai vu dans la doc Ubuntu pour Unity qu'il faut ajouter gnome-panel 
 aux applications à lancer au démarrage avant de désinstaller Unity. J'ai 
 trouvé dans la doc de gnome-shell qu'on peut ajouter une application par 
 Système - Préférences - Applications au démarrage. Applications au 
 démarrage n’apparaît pas chez moi sous Ubuntu 11.04 à jour.
 Comment faire pour installer cette fonctionnalité ou ajouter 
 gnome-shell aux applications de démarrage?
 
 Merci d'avance
 Michel
 
Il faut que tu vérifies si la case pour que ça apparaisse est cochée.Pour cela :

système  préférences  menu principal 

Ça ouvre une fenêtre avec une colonne à gauche avec les menus principaux.Tu 
cliques sur :

système  préférences 

Normalement, sur la droite tu vois tous les sous-menus que tu coches pour les 
voir apparaitre dans les menus déroulants 


Pierre.L


-- 
Liste de diffusion ubuntu-fr ubuntu-fr@lists.ubuntu.com
Pour s'abonner ou se désabonner : 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-fr
Charte de la liste: http://doc.ubuntu-fr.org/groupes/ubuntu-fr-ml/charte

[Bug 820764] [NEW] Extras archive consulted during install

2011-08-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
Public bug reported:

Given the nature of the extras archive, it should not be checked for
packages during install.  In practice nothing should be there that gets
installed, but it's an extra avenue for unwanted software that shouldn't
be used.

** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820764

Title:
  Extras archive consulted during install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/820764/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 820380] Re: Please sync golang r59 from Debian unstable

2011-08-04 Thread Emmet Hikory
Sync ACK: Ubuntu variation is no longer required with closure of Debian
bug #634270 (and confirmed in test-build for armel)

Additional Debian changelog:
golang (1:59-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Imported Upstream version 59
  * Refresh patches to a new release
  * Fix FTBFS on ARM (Closes: #634270)
  * Update version.bash to work with Debian packaging and not hg
repository

 -- Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org  Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:04:59 +0200

golang (1:58.1-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * Install golang-doc package by default (Recommends from golang-tools,
Depends from golang)

 -- Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org  Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:13:43 +0200


** Package changed: ubuntu = golang (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: golang (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Wishlist

** Changed in: golang (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Summary changed:

- Please sync golang r59 from Debian unstable
+ Please sync golang 1:59-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820380

Title:
  Please sync golang 1:59-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang/+bug/820380/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >