[Bug 1982969] Re: Missing binary package for octavia prometheus-proxy

2024-07-03 Thread Andre Ruiz
I have taken a look at this with the customer and indeed it seems a matter of 
adding a file to the deb package (file which is already in the sources, just 
being missed while packaging). Half of the functionality is there (the proxy 
itself) but the systemd-unit that starts the proxy is missing. Adding that file 
manually to the file-system fixes the issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982969

Title:
  Missing binary package for octavia prometheus-proxy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap-octavia-diskimage-retrofit/+bug/1982969/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2012309] Re: gdm3: autostart folder for .desktop files is not working in Ubuntu 23.04

2024-06-17 Thread Andre Ruiz
Seems like the application *is* started. I went to a tty shell and took
a list of processes running while the gdm was showing and saw that the
application was there, as a child to gdm.

But it does not show on the screen, probably something related to
wayland?

Still investigating.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012309

Title:
  gdm3: autostart folder for .desktop files is not working in Ubuntu
  23.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/2012309/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2012309] Re: gdm3: autostart folder for .desktop files is not working in Ubuntu 23.04

2024-06-17 Thread Andre Ruiz
Correction, opening an app AFTER the user logged in is working in 24.04, it was 
a mistake in my tests. Bu I still need to open an application in the gdm 
session itself, which still seems to be broken.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012309

Title:
  gdm3: autostart folder for .desktop files is not working in Ubuntu
  23.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/2012309/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2012309] Re: gdm3: autostart folder for .desktop files is not working in Ubuntu 23.04

2024-06-17 Thread Andre Ruiz
I'm seeing the same behavior in 24.04.

AFAIK the /usr/share/gdm/greeter/autostart/ is for apps to be started in
the GDM screen itself while the /usr/share/gdm/autostart/LoginWindow/ is
for apps to be started after the user logged in, which are different
things.

Both seem broken to me right now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012309

Title:
  gdm3: autostart folder for .desktop files is not working in Ubuntu
  23.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/2012309/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068030] Re: No drivers detected for TU104GL [T4G] card

2024-06-04 Thread Joao Andre Simioni
sos report of the jammy host

** Attachment added: "sosreport-ip-172-31-19-168-2024-06-04-gtcbeon.tar.xz"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/+bug/2068030/+attachment/5785859/+files/sosreport-ip-172-31-19-168-2024-06-04-gtcbeon.tar.xz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068030

Title:
  No drivers detected for TU104GL [T4G] card

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/+bug/2068030/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068030] [NEW] No drivers detected for TU104GL [T4G] card

2024-06-04 Thread Joao Andre Simioni
Public bug reported:

ubuntu-drivers is not returning any driver for g5g instances in AWS,
which use Tesla T4G cards:

# lspci -tv
-[:00]-+-00.0  Amazon.com, Inc. Device 0200
   +-01.0  Amazon.com, Inc. Device 8250
   +-04.0  Amazon.com, Inc. NVMe EBS Controller
   +-05.0  Amazon.com, Inc. Elastic Network Adapter (ENA)
   \-1f.0  NVIDIA Corporation TU104GL [T4G]

# ubuntu-drivers --gpgpu list
This is gpgpu mode

# uname -a
Linux ip-172-31-16-212 6.8.0-1008-aws #8-Ubuntu SMP Sat Apr 20 02:43:14 UTC 
2024 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 
GNU/Linux

# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
Release:24.04
Codename:   noble

Processor:
Handle 0x0004, DMI type 4, 42 bytes
Processor Information
Socket Designation: CPU00
Type: Central Processor
Family: ARMv8
Manufacturer: AWS
ID: C1 D0 3F 41 00 00 00 00
Signature: Implementor 0x41, Variant 0x3, Architecture 15, Part 0xd0c, 
Revision 1
Version: AWS Graviton2

I tried Noble and Jammy and both have the same behavior.

Manually installing the drivers works as expected (below is the output
in Jammy, as Noble is hitting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-
drivers-550-server/+bug/2062380 and freezes on module loading)

$ sudo nvidia-smi
Tue Jun  4 14:18:15 2024   
+---+
| NVIDIA-SMI 535.161.08 Driver Version: 535.161.08   CUDA Version: 
12.2 |
|-+--+--+
| GPU  Name Persistence-M | Bus-IdDisp.A | Volatile 
Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp   Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap | Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  
Compute M. |
| |  |  
 MIG M. |
|=+==+==|
|   0  NVIDIA T4G Off | :00:1F.0 Off |  
  0 |
| N/A   36CP0  27W /  70W |  2MiB / 15360MiB |  4%  
Default |
| |  |  
N/A |
+-+--+--+

 
+---+
| Processes:
|
|  GPU   GI   CIPID   Type   Process name
GPU Memory |
|ID   ID 
Usage  |
|===|
|  No running processes found   
|
+---+

** Affects: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068030

Title:
  No drivers detected for TU104GL [T4G] card

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/+bug/2068030/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064370] Re: Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

2024-05-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
Well, I cannot explain why but my problematic monitor decided to work well even 
without forcing hotplug, so now I cannot test the new kernels because I can't 
see the problem anymore.

I'll revisit this if it starts misbehaving again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064370

Title:
  Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/2064370/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064370] Re: Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

2024-05-02 Thread Andre Ruiz
@Dave so I tested this in 4 other monitors and they all worked as
expected without the need for forcing hotplug.

@Juerg you could say it's a regression because it worked on that
specific monitor and now it does not work anymore, but it is now
understood what happend and the reason for that (there was a switch from
fkms to kms right before official release and all my other tests were
with daily builds which were not using kms yet). But since it still
works ok with all my other monitors I'm not sure how much it is a
regression or how much it is just a fault of my specific hardware.

Anyway, I'll test both kernels and let you know.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064370

Title:
  Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/2064370/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064370] Re: Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

2024-05-01 Thread Andre Ruiz
Thank you for the explanation.

So that means that with different monitors I could potentially not need
this vc4.force_hotplug option, right? I will (as time permits) try
plugging this device in all my other monitors to compare, let's see how
it goes (this monitor specifically is a laptop LCD using a lcd
controller from ebay -- the others are all lg/samsung/dell ones, should
behave better).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064370

Title:
  Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/2064370/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064370] Re: Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

2024-05-01 Thread Andre Ruiz
Ok, adding vc4.force_hotplug=0x01 to the kernel command line _does_ fix
the issue, the screen flickers for a second but comes back with normal
image and stays on.

Also, now I seem to be able to decode edid many times in a row without
it disappearing (appearing empty).

I'm not running the test of forcing an edid.bin file because now there
seems to be no point in doing it, let me know if you need this or any
other test.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064370

Title:
  Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/2064370/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064370] Re: Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

2024-05-01 Thread Andre Ruiz
This is the complete boot log, just in case something in it is useful
(taken from the serial console including the firmware initialization
part):

https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/2HMBbBdcFp/

This is the config file used in that boot (which btw is the stock file
from image, unchanged):

https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/ySzZhbwPf2/

Note that the screen goes blank at the very end of that log, a few lines
before the login prompt (cannot say exactly where, seems to be around
the EXT4-fs (sda2): re-mounted message.

At the same time, this logs seems to be incomplete compared from what I
can see on the HDMI output when it works (in that case, with fKMS), I
can see many more lines between those last "rcu:" lines and the prompt
which I cannot see on the serial. Edit: I just realised the difference
is that I only see kernel messages on serial while I see kernel messages
+ systemd service messages on hdmi. No real problem here.

Unpluggin power to the monitor after it went dark and pluggin it back
does not help (this was suggested in one of the github issues).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064370

Title:
  Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/2064370/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064370] Re: Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

2024-05-01 Thread Andre Ruiz
Found one more bug report that may be related: 
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/5195


** Bug watch added: github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues #5195
   https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/5195

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064370

Title:
  Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/2064370/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064370] Re: Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

2024-05-01 Thread Andre Ruiz
Ok, running some tests.

First thing is that with fKMS overlay, right on boot (even before the
kernel started) I can see these messages on the serial console:

RPi: BOOTLOADER release VERSION:0b7b6f28 DATE: 2024/04/17 TIME: 13:51:36
BOOTMODE: 0x06 partition 0 build-ts BUILD_TIMESTAMP=1713358296 serial a0940f46 
boardrev b03111 stc
(lots of lines removed)
Boot mode: USB-MSD (04) order e
HDMI0 edid block 0 offset 0
000049f7
011a01038ad7a5a2594a9624
145054afce0081c00101010101010101
0101010101017f2156aa51001e30468f
33003f43211ea91a00a050001630
302037002056001a00fd0032
4c1e501a20202020202000fc
004141410a20202020202020200a016f
HDMI0 edid block 1 offset 128
020323744f109f140504131216111503
0702060123090f03830166030c00
100080011d00bc52d01e20b8285540c4
8e211e011d80d0721c1620102c25
80c48e219e8c0ad08a20e02d1010
3e9600138e21188c0ad090204031
200c405500138e211800
009d
HDMI0: best-mode 1 (limit 1) 1280x720 60 Hz CEA modes 
fe007f80 extensions 1
USB2[1] 400202e1 connected


If I switch to the KMS overlay, the message is exactly the same, so it means 
the EDID is accessible from the monitor in either case. I compared both outputs 
and they are the same.

But with KMS, as expected, the monitor went blank again by the end of
the boot messages.

Another interesting thing is that I *could* dump edid even with the KMS
overlay right after boot, once. When I tried again, it did not work
anymore, saying it was empty:

ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ edid-decode /sys/class/drm/card0-HDMI-A-1/edid 
edid-decode (hex):

00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 49 f7 00 00 00 00 00 00
01 1a 01 03 80 00 00 00 0a d7 a5 a2 59 4a 96 24
14 50 54 af ce 00 81 c0 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
01 01 01 01 01 01 7f 21 56 aa 51 00 1e 30 46 8f
33 00 3f 43 21 00 00 1e a9 1a 00 a0 50 00 16 30
30 20 37 00 20 56 00 00 00 1a 00 00 00 fd 00 32
4c 1e 50 10 00 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 fc
00 41 41 41 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 0a 01 6f

02 03 23 74 4f 10 9f 14 05 04 13 12 16 11 15 03
07 02 06 01 23 09 0f 03 83 01 00 00 66 03 0c 00
10 00 80 01 1d 00 bc 52 d0 1e 20 b8 28 55 40 c4
8e 21 00 00 1e 01 1d 80 d0 72 1c 16 20 10 2c 25
80 c4 8e 21 00 00 9e 8c 0a d0 8a 20 e0 2d 10 10
3e 96 00 13 8e 21 00 00 18 8c 0a d0 90 20 40 31
20 0c 40 55 00 13 8e 21 00 00 18 00 00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 9d



Block 0, Base EDID:
  EDID Structure Version & Revision: 1.3
  Vendor & Product Identification:
Manufacturer: ROW
Model: 0
Made in: week 1 of 2016
  Basic Display Parameters & Features:
Digital display
Image size is variable
Gamma: 1.00
RGB color display
First detailed timing is the preferred timing
  Color Characteristics:
Red  : 0.6357, 0.3486
Green: 0.2900, 0.5888
Blue : 0.1425, 0.0800
White: 0.3134, 0.3291
  Established Timings I & II:
IBM :   720x40070.081663 Hz   9:5 31.467 kHz 28.32 MHz
DMT 0x04:   640x48059.940476 Hz   4:3 31.469 kHz 25.175000 MHz
DMT 0x05:   640x48072.808802 Hz   4:3 37.861 kHz 31.50 MHz
DMT 0x06:   640x48075.00 Hz   4:3 37.500 kHz 31.50 MHz
DMT 0x08:   800x60056.25 Hz   4:3 35.156 kHz 36.00 MHz
DMT 0x09:   800x60060.316541 Hz   4:3 37.879 kHz 40.00 MHz
DMT 0x0a:   800x60072.187572 Hz   4:3 48.077 kHz 50.00 MHz
DMT 0x0b:   800x60075.00 Hz   4:3 46.875 kHz 49.50 MHz
DMT 0x10:  1024x76860.003840 Hz   4:3 48.363 kHz 65.00 MHz
DMT 0x11:  1024x76870.069359 Hz   4:3 56.476 kHz 75.00 MHz
DMT 0x12:  1024x76875.028582 Hz   4:3 60.023 kHz 78.75 MHz
  Standard Timings:
DMT 0x55:  1280x72060.00 Hz  16:9 45.000 kHz 74.25 MHz
  Detailed Timing Descriptors:
DTD 1:  1366x76859.964364 Hz 683:384   47.852 kHz 85.75 MHz 
(575 mm x 323 mm)
 Hfront   70 Hsync 143 Hback  213 Hpol P
 Vfront3 Vsync   3 Vback   24 Vpol P
DTD 2:  1280x76859.994726 Hz   5:3 47.396 kHz 68.25 MHz (32 
mm x 86 mm)
 Hfront   48 Hsync  32 Hback   80 Hpol P
 Vfront3 Vsync   7 Vback   12 Vpol N
Display Range Limits:
  Monitor ranges (GTF): 50-76 Hz V, 30-80 kHz H, max dotclock 160 MHz
Display Product Name: 'AAA'
  Extension blocks: 1
Checksum: 0x6f



Block 1, CTA-861 Extension Block:
  Revision: 3
  Basic audio support
  Supports YCbCr 4:4:4
  Supports YCbCr 4:2:2
  Native detailed modes: 4
  Video Data Block:
VIC  16:  1920x1080   60.00 Hz  16:9 67.500 kHz148.50 MHz
VIC  31:  1920x1080   50.00 Hz  16:9 56.250 kHz148.50 MHz 
(native)
VIC  20:  1920x1080i  50.00 Hz  16:9 28.125 kHz 74.25 MHz
VIC   5:  1920x1080i  60.00 Hz  16:9 33.750 kHz 74.25 

[Bug 2064370] Re: Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

2024-04-30 Thread Andre Ruiz
I just found a usb flash key with my last installation (from a daily
image) from a few days ago, and it does not have a line for that
dtoverlay at all (neither fkms nor kms).

This line seems to have appeared on the official release.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064370

Title:
  Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2064370/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064370] [NEW] Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

2024-04-30 Thread Andre Ruiz
Public bug reported:


I just flashed noble arm64+raspi image and booted it in my raspberry pi 4, and 
after initial rainbow screen kernel boots with 4 raspberries on the top and 
boot text appears as normal. But then, before it finishes booting, the screen 
goes blank.

Image is ubuntu-24.04-preinstalled-server-arm64+raspi.img.xz downloaded
at Apr/30.

ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ uname -a
Linux ubuntu 6.8.0-1004-raspi #4-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Apr 20 02:29:55 
UTC 2024 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux

I know the system booted because I can access it over the network and I
even plugged a usb-serial adapter in the uart GPIOs and from there I can
see the boot does progress to completion and offers me a prompt where I
can use the system normally. But the HDMI screen stays blank.

The funny thing is that I have been trying daily builds for quite some
time now and they used to work well, this is the first one that does
this (the official release).

After testing some config options I found that if I change
"dtoverlay=vc4-kms-v3d" for "dtoverlay=vc4-fkms-v3d" in config.txt then
it boots ok and the screen stays on (note the change from kms to fkms).

I also tried appending ",cma-128" to that line (it is present on other
lines -- like for pi3 and pi0 -- but not on this one), it does not help.

I don't think the issue is with my monitor since it works well for a
long time. Also I checked EDIDs, they are detected when using fkms but
they are blank when using kms:

With KMS:
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ edid-decode /sys/class/drm/card0-HDMI-A-1/edid 
EDID of '/sys/class/drm/card0-HDMI-A-1/edid' was empty.

With fKMS:
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ edid-decode /sys/class/drm/card0-HDMI-A-1/edid 
edid-decode (hex):

00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 49 f7 00 00 00 00 00 00
01 1a 01 03 80 00 00 00 0a d7 a5 a2 59 4a 96 24
..
(supressed)

I do not use a graphical environment on this unit so I don't know the
consequences of this change (to me it just fixes the issue, but I guess
it was there for a reason).

Let me know if you need any other information from the environment.

** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064370

Title:
  Blank screen after boot in raspberry pi 4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2064370/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063898] [NEW] broken doc symlinks after t64 transition in noble

2024-04-26 Thread Andre Tomt
Public bug reported:

$ pwd
/usr/share/doc/openssl

$ ls -l
total 52
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root30 mars  31 08:42 changelog.Debian.gz -> 
../libssl3/changelog.Debian.gz
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root23 mars  31 08:42 changelog.gz -> 
../libssl3/changelog.gz
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root20 mars  31 08:42 copyright -> ../libssl3/copyright

libssl3 doenst exist anymore, it is now libssl3t64

$ apt-cache policy openssl libssl3t64
openssl:
  Installed: 3.0.13-0ubuntu3
  Candidate: 3.0.13-0ubuntu3
  Version table:
 *** 3.0.13-0ubuntu3 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libssl3t64:
  Installed: 3.0.13-0ubuntu3
  Candidate: 3.0.13-0ubuntu3
  Version table:
 *** 3.0.13-0ubuntu3 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063898

Title:
  broken doc symlinks after t64 transition in noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2063898/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061068] Re: debsums check failed

2024-04-22 Thread Joao Andre Simioni
Weichen,

this was a bug on the snapd package until version 2.61.2:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/2057491

snapd is now updated to 2.61.3 and the issue is fixed. It's unrelated to
the changes you made.

I also tried to reproduce it in my environment with a fresh installation
and the issue didn't manifest, so I can confirm it's fixed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061068

Title:
  debsums check failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2061068/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2052961] Re: Error: OCI runtime error: crun: chmod : Operation not supported

2024-04-12 Thread Andre Wagner
Still any news yet? 
I want to emphasize that two updates to two Ubuntu LTS versions broke the one 
of the main features of the preferred container runtime on Ubuntu (over 
docker). A patch is ready and tested and after six weeks no further reaction...

Greetings,
André

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052961

Title:
  Error: OCI runtime error: crun: chmod : Operation not supported

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crun/+bug/2052961/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059874] Re: on upgrade sshd-socket-generator conversion does not respect administrator intent

2024-04-02 Thread Andre Tomt
I'm not that invested in the having openssh-server installed but not
running use-case, but in general people do not like their local
configuration beeing overridden on package upgrades in this manner.

I could image people having it installed for the man-pages, or maybe
using other units for it (per VRF instances or something), having the
main service and socket units disabled, but I doubt that happens that
much in practice.

For me the biggest problem was the socket unit beeing re-enabled when I
had it disabled it but still running sshd.service (ie without socket
activation) - now you're unexpectidly switched back to using socket
activation - something I explicitly opted out of.

I could also see this causing problems if you have the socket unit
masked (dont see why you would want that however) but the the service is
enabled, now you are without sshd. Actually I think the postinst would
also fail in that case, as systemctl enable fails enabling masked units.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059874

Title:
  on upgrade sshd-socket-generator conversion does not respect
  administrator intent

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2059874/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059874] [NEW] on upgrade sshd-socket-generator conversion does not respect administrator intent

2024-03-31 Thread Andre Tomt
Public bug reported:

the openssh-server 1:9.6p1-3ubuntu11 postinst contains this code
snippet:

if [ "$action" == configure ]; then
  ..snip..
  if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt-nl 1:9.6p1-3ubuntu3~; then
..snip..
if [ -d /run/systemd/system ]; then
  # Make sure ssh.service is disabled.
  systemctl unmask ssh.service
  systemctl disable --now ssh.service > /dev/null 2>&1

  # sshd-socket-generator is invoked on daemon-reload.
  systemctl daemon-reload
  systemctl enable ssh.socket
fi
  fi
fi

This does not respect existing service and socket unit configuration, it
effectively re-enables a disabled ssh.service (and even a masked one),
and a manually disabled socket unit. I strongly suspect it does not
respect systemd presets either.

This is unexpected behaviour.

** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059874

Title:
  on upgrade sshd-socket-generator conversion does not respect
  administrator intent

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2059874/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059872] [NEW] Unable to listen on port 22 if multiple Port= present in sshd configuration

2024-03-31 Thread Andre Tomt
Public bug reported:

Recently introduced sshd-socket-generator for socket activation in
openssh 1:9.6p1-3ubuntu3 has a bug when dealing with multiple Port or
ListenAddress entries in the sshd configuration.

If you have multiple Port or ListenAddress and one of them is for port
22, it just skips it.

To show it clearly, here is an example:
Port 22
Port 1024

It generates:
ListenStream=
ListenStream=1024

Now nothing is listening to port 22, hence breaking existing
configurations.

This was tested on 1:9.6p1-3ubuntu11.

The intention seems to be to not generate the drop-in if only port 22 is
in use, but it does not account for the case of multiple Port or
ListenAddress where one of them is for port 22.

** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059872

Title:
  Unable to listen on port 22 if multiple Port= present in sshd
  configuration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2059872/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2052961] Re: Error: OCI runtime error: crun: chmod : Operation not supported

2024-03-25 Thread Andre Wagner
Hi @all,
a colleague of mine also experienced the same problem with Ubuntu linux kernel 
version 5.15.0-101 (on Ubuntu 22.04). The patch I made 
(ignore_enotsup_when_chmod_a_symlink.patch) fixes also this problem.

Greetings,
André

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052961

Title:
  Error: OCI runtime error: crun: chmod : Operation not supported

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crun/+bug/2052961/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2006402] Re: Update focal, jammy to landscape-client 23.02

2024-03-14 Thread Andre Ruiz
What is the correct PPA to have the newest landscape clients until this
is fixed?

I found ppa:landscape/production which is very outdated, and
ppa:landscape/trunk which does have version 23.10 but it seems odd that
a customer needs to use "trunk" and not "production". Also I was
avoiding pointing the customer a the server repo (for example
ppa:landscape/self-hosted-*) because it can be confusing/dangerous for a
customer to be able to install the server in a workstation by mistake.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2006402

Title:
  Update focal, jammy to landscape-client 23.02

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/2006402/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2052961] Re: Error: OCI runtime error: crun: chmod : Operation not supported

2024-03-06 Thread Andre Wagner
** Package changed: crun (Ubuntu) => linux-meta-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052961

Title:
  Error: OCI runtime error: crun: chmod : Operation not supported

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta-hwe-6.5/+bug/2052961/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2052961] Re: Error: OCI runtime error: crun: chmod : Operation not supported

2024-02-27 Thread Andre Wagner
Hi @all,
I was also unable to run systemd with kernel 6.5.0-21-generic, got the exactly 
the same problem.
I backported 
https://github.com/containers/crun/commit/be16ee75ff8574698250352302e9d5496d888d69
 as a quilt patch for the ubuntu recent version of crun 0.17+dfsg-1.1 (see 
attachment). After applying the patch, systemd works again as expected.

Grettings,
André


** Patch added: "ignore_enotsup_when_chmod_a_symlink.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crun/+bug/2052961/+attachment/5749829/+files/ignore_enotsup_when_chmod_a_symlink.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052961

Title:
  Error: OCI runtime error: crun: chmod : Operation not supported

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crun/+bug/2052961/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Ubuntu-BR] [email] via terminal - usando o mutt

2022-10-28 Thread Andre Luiz Duarte Cavalcante
Olá Fábio bom dia.

Em qua, 19 de out de 2022 09:24, Fabio Bairros 
escreveu:

> Saudações
>
> Estou usando o ubuntu mini e gostaria de enviar e-mails usando o mutt (por
> exemplo) e enviar arquivos anexados. Fiz a instalação do mutt, mas os
> e-mails não são enviados, ficam na caixa indicando impossibilidade de
> entrega. Existe alguma outra configuração necessária ?
>


O mutt é só o front end. Você ainda precisa instalar quem realmente faz as
coisas, por exemplo, sendmail.

Veja a documentação.

Eu uso o mutt principalmente em scripts e funciona muito bem, inclusive com
o gmail. Mas tens que configurar a senha de aplicativo no gmail e o mutt
para usar https e essa senha.

Abraços.

André Cavalcante
Manaus, AM.




>
>
>
>
> att,
> Fabio Bairros
> --
> Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece
>
> Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
> Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br
>
-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


[Bug 1818811] Re: The swapfile on the Btrfs file system is not activated

2022-04-29 Thread Andre Ruiz
The problem is that a swapfile in btrfs cannot have CoW activated on the
file, and cannot be compressed. Also, you should not leave the file in
the root filesystem (even if it would work with the above settings)
because it will make snapshots of /@ messy.

If you manually do this, it will work:

- create a separate subvolume just for swap
- mount it somewhere like /swap (also add to fstab)
- create an empty file (/swap/swapfile)
- set non-compress and no-CoW on the file
- grow the file to the desired size
- mkswap on the file
- add swap file to fstab

now you can swapon -a and it will work.

The installer does not do that, it just creates a /swapfile as it would
do on any other filesystem and then on reboot it will not start.

Amano instructions above will work, but I would advise to also create
the subvolume.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818811

Title:
  The swapfile on the Btrfs file system is not activated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1818811/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1969510] [NEW] MaaS deletes image architectures if you delete all images of that architecture

2022-04-19 Thread Andre Ruiz
Public bug reported:


If you try to import a custom image in maas cli it fails with a cryptic error 
which turns out to be because of a non-existing architecture.

Upon further investigation, it seems that if you delete all images of a
specific architecture the architecture itself disappears and then you
cannot add a custom image, which will fail.

Workaround is to go back to the images section in the GUI, select some
ubuntu image of that architecture, wait for it to download and then re-
try adding the custom image which will then work.

This is very non-intuitive for end users, and also it's possible for an
airgapped environment to erase all images and then get into a situation
where they cannot recover.

My understanding is that this is a known behavior, which makes this is
bug report a feature-request to 'fix' this to work in a more intuitive
way.

** Affects: maas (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969510

Title:
  MaaS deletes image architectures if you delete all images of that
  architecture

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1969510/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968335] Re: apparmor profile needs extension

2022-04-19 Thread Andre Wagner
I've also retested your fix. It works like a charm. Thank you very much.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968335

Title:
  apparmor profile needs extension

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/swtpm/+bug/1968335/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959475] Re: "machinectl shell" connections immediately terminated

2022-04-14 Thread Andre Tomt
Please consider backporting for Focal (20.04) at least. The backport is
trivial and applies cleanly as-is except for patch offsets.

Might be wise to test some other combinations though. For example hosts
without this commit, running nspawn containers with it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959475

Title:
  "machinectl shell" connections immediately terminated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1959475/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959475] Re: "machinectl shell" connections immediately terminated

2022-04-14 Thread Andre Tomt
Just tested, and can confirm backporting
e8cf09b2a2ad0d48e5493050d54251d5f512d9b6 to focal's systemd fixes the
segfaults when using machinectl shell on a Jammy host trying to start a
shell in a Focal nspawn container.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959475

Title:
  "machinectl shell" connections immediately terminated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1959475/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968335] [NEW] apparmor profile needs extension

2022-04-08 Thread Andre Wagner
Public bug reported:

Hi team,
I've tried to create a socket activated systemd service for supplying a 
software tpm for qemu. As it didn't worked I recognized that the swtpm package 
ships an apparmor profile. To make it work i've to add a read/write/lock 
permission for the tpm's nvram folder and a read/write permission for the tpm's 
unix socket used for the connection with qemu.

Since there is no default location for the tpm nvram (correct?) I
suggest using "/var/lib/swtpm" which follows the /var/lib/
convention.

Since there is no default location for the tpm unix socket I suggest
using "/run/swtpm/sock" which follows the systemd.socket unit
conventions

A patch which adds the settings is attached to this message.

Greetings,
André

** Affects: swtpm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Patch added: "add_socket_and_nvram.diff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968335/+attachment/5578260/+files/add_socket_and_nvram.diff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968335

Title:
  apparmor profile needs extension

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/swtpm/+bug/1968335/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1966432] Re: audio crackling on usb sound card

2022-03-28 Thread Andre Ruiz
I noticed my usb audio started crackling on the last few days. It does
not happen on internal audio, just on my Xenyx 302 USB external mixer. I
followed the suggestion of reverting to old kernel above and it seems to
have fixed the issue.

5.13.0-37 has issues, 5.13.0-35 is good.

Please let me know of any other information you may need to help find
the issue.


** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966432

Title:
  audio crackling on usb sound card

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966432/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1966432] Re: audio crackling on usb sound card

2022-03-28 Thread Andre Ruiz
Changing to confirmed because it affects at least 3 people.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966432

Title:
  audio crackling on usb sound card

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1966432/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965984] [NEW] Cannot build udeb with debhelper 13.6ubuntu1

2022-03-22 Thread Andre Wagner
Public bug reported:

Hi,
I'm trying to rebuild a traditional server installer, therefore I've to build 
Debian-Installer udeb Packages. But this does not work with debhelper 
13.6ubuntu1 on the actual ubuntu 22.04 prerelease. I found the root cause: It's 
ubuntu specific patch on debhelper described in debian changelog as "Imply 
'' profile if not set on package type udeb". I reverted that patch and 
now the build of udebs works again.

Greetings,
André

##
Reverting the buggy ubuntu specific patch
##
--- Dh_Lib.pm.orig  2022-03-22 21:27:31.984788688 +0100
+++ Dh_Lib.pm   2022-03-22 21:27:51.352850840 +0100
@@ -1974,9 +1974,6 @@
}
 
$package_types{$package} = 
_strip_spaces($field_values{'package-type'} // 'deb');
-if ($package_types{$package} eq 'udeb' and 
!defined($build_profiles)) {
-   $build_profiles = '';
-}
$package_arches{$package} = $arch;
$package_multiarches{$package} = 
_strip_spaces($field_values{'multi-arch'} // '');
$package_sections{$package} = 
_strip_spaces($field_values{'section'} // $source_section);;

#
Howto reproduce the bug:
#
$wget 
http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_47.dsc
$wget 
http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_47.tar.xz
$dpkg-source -x partman-auto-raid_47.dsc
$cd partman-auto-raid-47/
$dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -A
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package partman-auto-raid
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 47
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Holger Wansing 
 dpkg-source --before-build .
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh clean --with d-i
dh: warning: No packages to build. Possible architecture mismatch: amd64, want: 
all
 debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with d-i
dh: warning: No packages to build. Possible architecture mismatch: amd64, want: 
all
 fakeroot debian/rules binary-indep
dh binary-indep --with d-i
dh: warning: No packages to build. Possible architecture mismatch: amd64, want: 
all
 dpkg-genbuildinfo --build=all -O../partman-auto-raid_47_all.buildinfo
dpkg-genbuildinfo: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; 
.buildinfo is meaningless
dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-genbuildinfo --build=all 
-O../partman-auto-raid_47_all.buildinfo subprocess returned exit status 255


After applying my patch, i.e. reverting the ubuntu specific patch
###
$wget 
http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_47.dsc
$wget 
http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_47.tar.xz
$dpkg-source -x partman-auto-raid_47.dsc
$cd partman-auto-raid-47/
$dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -A
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package partman-auto-raid
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 47
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution unstable
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Holger Wansing 
 dpkg-source --before-build .
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh clean --with d-i
dh: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in use)
   dh_di_kernel_gencontrol
   dh_clean
dh_clean: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in 
use)
 debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with d-i
dh: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in use)
   dh_di_kernel_gencontrol -i
   dh_update_autotools_config -i
 fakeroot debian/rules binary-indep
dh binary-indep --with d-i
dh: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in use)
   dh_testroot -i
   dh_prep -i
   dh_auto_install --destdir=debian/partman-auto-raid/ -i
dh_auto_install: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 
9 in use)
   dh_install -i
dh_install: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in 
use)
   dh_di_kernel_install -i
   dh_di_numbers -i
dh_di_numbers: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 
in use)
   dh_installdocs -i
dh_installdocs: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 
in use)
   dh_installchangelogs -i
   dh_installdebconf -i
   dh_perl -i
   dh_link -i
   dh_strip_nondeterminism -i
   dh_compress -i
dh_compress: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in 
use)
   dh_fixperms -i
   dh_missing -i
dh_missing: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in 
use)
   dh_installdeb -i
   dh_gencontrol -i
   dh_md5sums -i
   dh_builddeb -i
dpkg-deb: building package 'partman-auto-raid' in 
'debian/.debhelper/scratch-space/build-partman-auto-raid/partman-auto-raid_47_all.deb'.
Renaming partman-auto-raid_47_all.deb to partman-auto-raid_47_all.udeb
 

[Bug 1960505] [NEW] Black Screen during work Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

2022-02-10 Thread Andre
Public bug reported:

Black Screen !!!not during Boot!!! !!!during Work!!!
1)
New lap top and new installation of Ubuntu 20.04.3 lts
2)
apt-cache policy pkgname is not working; Pkgconf? > Version table: 1.6.3-5 500

Hardware:
Dell XPS17 with Intel Core i9
GPU Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 incl Driver installed.

description:
From Time to Time I end up in a black screen during my work. 
it happens during Writing, using the mouse 
No specific running Software.

Again: It happens during my Work! it is not the Screen safer. It is
maybe related to the screen safer. The screen safer usually don't start
during work.

then I can not log in again.
When I close the Laptop and open it again, usually the Login Screens pop up 
again.
If I wait eg. one Hour and I move the mouse, the Login Screen pop up again.

I did not fond something in the syslog.
Tail -f syslog will not work; > black screen 

I can not open a other TTY.

any advice where to find some detailed Error messages in log files?

Tryed to find something in the Internet > nothing.

3) 
it should not happen.
4)
see description.

Thanks for Support

** Affects: nvidia-prime (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960505

Title:
  Black Screen during work Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-prime/+bug/1960505/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950350] Re: octavia LBs always offline in Xena

2021-11-11 Thread Andre Ruiz
Confirmed, everything working as it should. LB is online/active, all resources 
working well (health checsks, backends, etc.). Even adding a FIP and accessing 
from "outside".

I'm closing as invalid, and keeping the other bug.


** Changed in: octavia (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350

Title:
  octavia LBs always offline in Xena

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1950350/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950350] Re: octavia LBs always offline in Xena

2021-11-11 Thread Andre Ruiz
I created a new bug for FCE --> 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cpe-foundation/+bug/1950678

I could not just add it here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350

Title:
  octavia LBs always offline in Xena

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1950350/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950350] Re: octavia LBs always offline in Xena

2021-11-11 Thread Andre Ruiz
Ok, I was taking a deeper look at corey's output (where it shows LB is active) 
(comment #8) and wanted to try that "ovn" driver that appears on his output 
(not directly related to this problem, but anyway).

Then I saw the documentation saying that if you deploy octavia with OVN
you should get that automatically. You can see in my outputs that I did
not have it, even using OVN.

On deeper inspection, I noticed I was missing a relation from the
example overlay. This relation is not automatically added by the FCE
bundle builder, this one:

- - octavia:ovsdb-cms
  - ovn-central:ovsdb-cms

I'm not sure if this is new in Xena, or was already needed before
(Wallaby? maybe even Ussuri?). When I added it manually, I did get the
OVN driver to appear in the list.

And to my surprise, my test loadbalancer (the one with octavia
driver) went online!!!

This makes it seem like this relation is more important than just the
OVN driver itself.

Can someone confirm what it is for?

Anyway, I'm adding FCE to the affected components.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350

Title:
  octavia LBs always offline in Xena

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1950350/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950350] Re: octavia LBs always offline in Xena

2021-11-11 Thread Andre Ruiz
I removed all configs (flavor, flavorprofile, availabilityzone, 
availabilityzoneprofile) and just created a very simple loadbalancer passing 
only name and network options.

It still get ACTIVE/OFFLINE.

ubuntu@app1maas001p:~/2021-09-20-OP-212891-xxx-Prod1$ openstack loadbalancer 
list
+--+--+--+-+-+--+--+
| id   | name | project_id  
 | vip_address | provisioning_status | operating_status | provider |
+--+--+--+-+-+--+--+
| 0debcdb0-64a6-47b8-847d-ec6610544711 | lb4  | 
4d766f4d974c4419bfe0037f51e0b1aa | 172.16.0.57 | ACTIVE  | OFFLINE  
| amphora  |
+--+--+--+-+-+--+--+

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350

Title:
  octavia LBs always offline in Xena

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1950350/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950350] Re: octavia LBs always offline in Xena

2021-11-10 Thread Andre Ruiz
I'm taking a step back and trying to just create a simple loadbalancer
without any resources and get that ONLINE, like you can see here (from
coreycb):

https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/NRdsvPrRhB/

Instead, I get this:

https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/FGcwHkgZ27/

The amphora image in these tests was generated by GSS + retrofit.

This is some extra info about the flavors configured on my system:

https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/PD875kjXw9/

I still get errors in the logs while creating the LB. These are the last
200 lines of each log file in the first unit (other two are very
similar).

https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/cdSSfRkj43/

This cloud was tottaly redeployed from scratch for this test.

The juju-log for the octavia units do not have anything useful (no
errors or clues).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350

Title:
  octavia LBs always offline in Xena

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1950350/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950350] Re: octavia LBs always offline in Xena

2021-11-09 Thread Andre Ruiz
https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/rW8b88MRVj/

Also found these errors in /var/log/octavia/octavia-worker.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350

Title:
  octavia LBs always offline in Xena

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1950350/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950350] Re: octavia LBs always offline in Xena

2021-11-09 Thread Andre Ruiz
https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/dnq9sBZMKn/

Found SQL error in /var/log/octavia/octavia-health-manager.log about
health monitor. I have very similar messagens on the 3 octavia units.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350

Title:
  octavia LBs always offline in Xena

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1950350/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950350] Re: octavia LBs always offline in Xena

2021-11-09 Thread Andre Ruiz
I have no errors when installing octavia, nothing unusual on the juju logs.

I'm searching for specific backend health logs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350

Title:
  octavia LBs always offline in Xena

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1950350/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950350] Re: octavia LBs always offline in Xena

2021-11-09 Thread Andre Ruiz
https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/fBwxNVPVB7/

This is the whole loadbalancer creation log. You can see all backends
are "offline" at the end (and they stay offline).

https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/yZVCb2Py63/

This is all the security groups on the system, including the ones
created byu octavia.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350

Title:
  octavia LBs always offline in Xena

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1950350/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950350] Re: octavia LBs always offline in Xena

2021-11-09 Thread Andre Ruiz
I have tried to add ALL possible roles related to octavia to the admin user and 
it did not improve the situation.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350

Title:
  octavia LBs always offline in Xena

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1950350/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950350] [NEW] octavia LBs always offline in Xena

2021-11-09 Thread Andre Ruiz
Public bug reported:


After switching from Wallaby to Xena, the same procedure to create a simple 
loadbalancer is no longer working (both from dashboard and from CLI). All 
backends appear as offline, as if the monitor tests were failing, although the 
service is accessible.

** Affects: octavia (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350

Title:
  octavia LBs always offline in Xena

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1950350/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950350] Re: octavia LBs always offline in Xena

2021-11-09 Thread Andre Ruiz
Subscribed field-critical.

I'll add more information as soon as possible, but I'm available for
debugging if someone can work on this.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950350

Title:
  octavia LBs always offline in Xena

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1950350/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945707] Re: BCM57800 SRIOV bug causes interfaces to disappear

2021-11-08 Thread Andre Ruiz
I changed the tag for "verification-needed-focal" to "verification-done-
focal", but I would like to add that the version of the kernel listed on
the "focal" fix above is 5.8, when in fact the GA kernel for focal is
5.4.

Kernel 5.8 has been an HWE kernel for focal in the past but even then
it's already superceed by 5.11 and now 5.13. I think 5.4 is not
mentioned here because the change came from upstream and not from a
local patch.

Anyway, 5.4.0-90 has the fix.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945707

Title:
  BCM57800 SRIOV bug causes interfaces to disappear

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1945707/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945707] Re: BCM57800 SRIOV bug causes interfaces to disappear

2021-11-08 Thread Andre Ruiz
I can confirm that this is fixed for focal GA kernel. Kernel 5.4.0-89
still have the problem and kernel 5.4.0-90 is fixed, I can see all nics
on the card now.


** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945707

Title:
  BCM57800 SRIOV bug causes interfaces to disappear

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1945707/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945707] Re: BCM57800 SRIOV bug causes interfaces to disappear

2021-10-29 Thread Andre Ruiz
Sure! I cannot redeploy right now because I'm using the cloud to chase another 
bug, bug will do asap and report back.

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945707

Title:
  BCM57800 SRIOV bug causes interfaces to disappear

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1945707/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-22 Thread Andre Ruiz
Just a comment on wallaby-proposed packages, I installed those on all 
ovn-related units and don't see errors about RBAC anymore, and I also didn't 
notice any other collateral effect.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475

Title:
  RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1917475/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-19 Thread Andre Ruiz
Just upgrading the packages (from focal-wallaby-proposed) did not help.
I upgraded on all ovn-chassis (even the octavia ones), all ovn-central,
all ovn-chassis-gateway. I also deleted the LB and recreated completely.

On a separate note, when I try to run "ovn-sbctl find connection" the
command freezes. Strace shows repeatedly:

poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, 4000)  = 0 (Timeout)
getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD, {ru_utime={tv_sec=0, tv_usec=0}, ru_stime={tv_sec=0, 
tv_usec=8964}, ...}) = 0
socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 5
fcntl(5, F_GETFL)   = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR)
fcntl(5, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK)= 0
connect(5, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, sun_path="/var/run/ovn/ovnsb_db.sock"}, 29) = -1 
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
close(5)

Any advice is welcome, thank you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475

Title:
  RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1917475/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-19 Thread Andre Ruiz
Ok, I'll try to update from proposed and test. Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475

Title:
  RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1917475/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1917475] Re: RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

2021-10-19 Thread Andre Ruiz
I seem to be having this problem on a focal / wallaby deployment, although I 
don't have that exact message (about prohibit update of port_binding), I only 
have:

root@srv2dell001p:/var/log/ovn# grep -i perm ovn-controller.log 

 
│2021-10-19T14:03:41.342Z|00076|ovsdb_idl|WARN|transaction
 error: {"details":"RBAC rules for client 
\"srv2dell001p.oam.prd.infra.sicredi.net\" role \"ovn-controller\" prohibit row 
insertion into table \"Encap\".","│
error":"permission error"}  

 
│2021-10-19T14:03:41.342Z|00079|ovsdb_idl|WARN|transaction
 error: {"details":"RBAC rules for client 
\"srv2dell001p.oam.prd.infra.sicredi.net\" role \"ovn-controller\" prohibit row 
insertion into table \"Chassis\"."│
,"error":"permission error"}

 
│2021-10-19T14:03:41.343Z|00081|ovsdb_idl|WARN|transaction
 error: {"details":"RBAC rules for client 
\"srv2dell001p.oam.prd.infra.sicredi.net\" role \"ovn-controller\" prohibit row 
insertion into table \"Encap\".","│
error":"permission error"}  

 
│2021-10-19T14:03:41.344Z|00083|ovsdb_idl|WARN|transaction
 error: {"details":"RBAC rules for client 
\"srv2dell001p.oam.prd.infra.sicredi.net\" role \"ovn-controller\" prohibit row 
insertion into table \"Chassis\"."│
,"error":"permission error"}

 
│2021-10-19T14:03:41.345Z|00085|ovsdb_idl|WARN|transaction
 error: {"details":"RBAC rules for client 
\"srv2dell001p.oam.prd.infra.sicredi.net\" role \"ovn-controller\" prohibit row 
insertion into table \"Chassis\"."│
,"error":"permission error"} 

I'm trying to apply the workaround but the ovn-sbctl is not connecting
to the ovndb. Working on that.

Meanwhile, is this considered fixed and released in focal + wallaby?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917475

Title:
  RBAC Permissions too strict for Port_Binding table

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1917475/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 951977] Re: Music library and radio station data should be stored separately

2021-10-17 Thread Andre Klapper
Walter: No, it has not been implemented.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/rhythmbox/-/issues/51 is still open.

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/rhythmbox/-/issues #51
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/rhythmbox/-/issues/51

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951977

Title:
  Music library and radio station data should be stored separately

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/rhythmbox/+bug/951977/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Re: DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
Ok, I should have waited for the firmware upgrade before posting this.

They seemed to be pretty outdated, went from FW v10.2.377.29 to
v11.4.1186.4

And... drum roll. it worked. Fixed the problem.


** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Re: DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
Just for clarification:

There are 2 DHCP servers on this segment (one in HA, actually). Both
respond, and I can see both Offers in the bridge. One coming straight
from the host and another one form a different host via the uplink.
Neither of them reach the vm (which should receive both and choose one
to answer). When the uplink is out, the one from the host gets through.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Re: DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
I'm also seeing a lot of "[263380.267602] br-bond0: received packet on bond0 
with own address as source address (addr:4a:e1:8f:bc:32:3d, vlan:0)" in dmesg 
when I add the ip manually (and it works -- but gives me these messages).

I don't think how a loop could be in play here, with only 1 uplink port
and 1 vm port.

The customer says they have STP enable on the rest of the network and a
loop outside is very unlikely. I'm ignoring this for now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Re: DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
I tested setting ageing to 0 (suggested at some internet forums):

brctl setageing br-bond0 0

No improvement.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Re: DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
I tried the exact same things on different environments and it always works. It 
seems to be something related to this hardware, because it happens exactly the 
same on 3 machines.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] acpidump.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "acpidump.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530577/+files/acpidump.txt

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] WifiSyslog.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530576/+files/WifiSyslog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] UdevDb.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530575/+files/UdevDb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] ProcModules.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530574/+files/ProcModules.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] ProcInterrupts.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530573/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] ProcEnviron.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530572/+files/ProcEnviron.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530571/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530570/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Lsusb-v.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "Lsusb-v.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530569/+files/Lsusb-v.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Lsusb.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530567/+files/Lsusb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Lsusb-t.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "Lsusb-t.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530568/+files/Lsusb-t.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Lspci-vt.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "Lspci-vt.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530566/+files/Lspci-vt.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Lspci.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530565/+files/Lspci.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Re: DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected focal uec-images

** Description changed:

  
  I'm facing a problem in a customer where a VM plugged to a bridge will not 
get DHCP responses from dhcp server running on the host or externally (the 
bridge has level 2 external uplink).
  
  Relevant information:
  
  - focal with latest GA kernel (5.4.0-88)
  - tested with HWE (5.11) and same results
  - bridge is configured using netplan, with bond as uplink, ip on the bridge
  - removed bond from the equation (bridge --> eno1), same result
  - host can access external network with no problems using the uplink plugged 
in the bridge
  - dhcp server (ISC-DHCP) configured on the host
  - stp on the bridge is disabled
  
  Create VM, attach it to the bridge, power it on, boots. Requests IP via
  DHCP. The discover can be seen on tcpdump inside the vm, and also on the
  tcpdump on the host bridge. DHCP server answers with Offer, that packet
  can be seen in the bridge but do not enter the VM.
  
  If I manually put an IP on the VM, it pings the host and the external
  world. Mac/ARP resolution seems to be working both ways (arping tested).
  
  Now, if I UNPLUG the uplink from the bridge (leaving only the host
  itself with IP on the bridge and one VM plugged on it) then the VM can
  get IP via DHCP, the Offer comes in. I'm not sure why it matters having
  the uplink when dhcp requests are being answered locally.
  
  After being able to ping externally, if I remove the IP and try DHCP
  again, it fails again.
  
  The hardware is a IBM HS23 blade with Emulex 10Gbit cards:
  
  ubuntu@app2maas001p:~$ lspci -v | grep -i net
  16:00.0 Ethernet controller: Emulex Corporation OneConnect 10Gb NIC (be3) 
(rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: be2net
Kernel modules: be2net
  16:00.1 Ethernet controller: Emulex Corporation OneConnect 10Gb NIC (be3) 
(rev 03)
Kernel driver in use: be2net
Kernel modules: be2net
  
- I'm verifying if there is firmware updates available but I doubt it. No
- extra features (like FCoE, partitioning, etc.) are enabled on the card.
- It's a single dual-port mezanine card.
+ I'm verifying if there is firmware updates available but I doubt it. No extra 
features (like FCoE, partitioning, etc.) are enabled on the card. It's a single 
dual-port mezanine card.
+ --- 
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ AlsaDevices:
+  total 0
+  crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116,  1 Oct  1 18:37 seq
+  crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116, 33 Oct  1 18:37 timer
+ AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay'
+ ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20
+ Architecture: amd64
+ ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord'
+ AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', 
'/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1:
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
+ InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-21 (13 days ago)
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210824)
+ IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iwconfig'
+ MachineType: IBM BladeCenter HS23 -[7875AC1]-
+ NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
+ Package: linux (not installed)
+ PciMultimedia:
+  
+ ProcFB: 0 mgag200drmfb
+ ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-88-generic 
root=UUID=37c86220-68e3-45c6-b333-614ece4d7e57 ro
+ ProcVersionSignature: User Name 5.4.0-88.99-generic 5.4.140
+ RelatedPackageVersions:
+  linux-restricted-modules-5.4.0-88-generic N/A
+  linux-backports-modules-5.4.0-88-generic  N/A
+  linux-firmware1.187.17
+ RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'rfkill'
+ Tags:  focal uec-images
+ Uname: Linux 5.4.0-88-generic x86_64
+ UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ UserGroups: adm cdrom dip libvirt lxd plugdev sudo
+ _MarkForUpload: True
+ dmi.bios.date: 05/14/2014
+ dmi.bios.vendor: IBM
+ dmi.bios.version: -[TKE140YUS-1.60]-
+ dmi.board.name: 00AE761
+ dmi.board.vendor: IBM
+ dmi.chassis.asset.tag: none
+ dmi.chassis.type: 28
+ dmi.chassis.vendor: IBM
+ dmi.chassis.version: none
+ dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIBM:bvr-[TKE140YUS-1.60]-:bd05/14/2014:svnIBM:pnBladeCenterHS23-[7875AC1]-:pvr07:rvnIBM:rn00AE761:rvr:cvnIBM:ct28:cvrnone:
+ dmi.product.family: System X
+ dmi.product.name: BladeCenter HS23 -[7875AC1]-
+ dmi.product.version: 07
+ dmi.sys.vendor: IBM

** Attachment added: "CRDA.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530563/+files/CRDA.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] CurrentDmesg.txt

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
apport information

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028/+attachment/5530564/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Re: DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
This is the netplan config:

network:
  ethernets:
eno1: {}
enp22s0f1: {}
  bonds:
bond0:
  # vlan 3801 - OAM is native (no tag)
  interfaces:
  - eno1
  - enp22s0f1
  parameters:
primary: eno1
mode: active-backup
mii-monitor-interval: 1s
  mtu: 9000
  bridges:
br-bond0:
  addresses:
  - 100.126.0.12/23
  gateway4: 100.126.0.10
  nameservers:
addresses:
- 172.21.12.32
- 172.21.12.62
search: [ "oam.prd.infra.sicredi.net" ]
  interfaces:
  - bond0
  parameters:
forward-delay: 0
priority: 0
stp: false
  mtu: 9000
  version: 2

I tested with different MTU values with no changes to the result.

These are the interfaces in linux:

2: eno1:  mtu 9000 qdisc mq master bond0 
state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 72:34:88:50:6c:2c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

3: enp22s0f1:  mtu 9000 qdisc mq master 
bond0 state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 72:34:88:50:6c:2c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

6: br-bond0:  mtu 9000 qdisc noqueue state UP 
group default qlen 1000
link/ether 72:34:88:50:6c:2c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 100.126.0.12/23 brd 100.126.1.255 scope global br-bond0
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::5018:6cff:fecf:de8a/64 scope link 
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

32: bond0:  mtu 9000 qdisc noqueue 
master br-bond0 state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 72:34:88:50:6c:2c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

39: tap864c7e54:  mtu 9000 qdisc mq master 
br-bond0 state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether ba:a8:b7:fb:e1:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Re: DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
This is the bridge info:

ubuntu@app2maas001p:~$ brctl show br-bond0
bridge name bridge id   STP enabled interfaces
br-bond08000.723488506c2c   no  bond0
tap864c7e54


ubuntu@app2maas001p:~$ brctl showstp br-bond0
br-bond0
 bridge id  8000.723488506c2c
 designated root8000.723488506c2c
 root port 0path cost  0
 max age  20.00 bridge max age20.00
 hello time2.00 bridge hello time  2.00
 forward delay 0.00 bridge forward delay   0.00
 ageing time 300.00
 hello timer   0.00 tcn timer  0.00
 topology change timer 0.00 gc timer   1.32
 flags  


bond0 (1)
 port id8001stateforwarding
 designated root8000.723488506c2c   path cost  2
 designated bridge  8000.723488506c2c   message age timer  0.00
 designated port8001forward delay timer0.00
 designated cost   0hold timer 0.00
 flags  

tap864c7e54 (2)
 port id8002stateforwarding
 designated root8000.723488506c2c   path cost100
 designated bridge  8000.723488506c2c   message age timer  0.00
 designated port8002forward delay timer0.00
 designated cost   0hold timer 0.00
 flags

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] Re: DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
Iptables is empty with all ACCEPT policy.

ebtables is empty with all ACCEPT policy.

ufw is inactive.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946028] [NEW] DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

2021-10-04 Thread Andre Ruiz
Public bug reported:


I'm facing a problem in a customer where a VM plugged to a bridge will not get 
DHCP responses from dhcp server running on the host or externally (the bridge 
has level 2 external uplink).

Relevant information:

- focal with latest GA kernel (5.4.0-88)
- tested with HWE (5.11) and same results
- bridge is configured using netplan, with bond as uplink, ip on the bridge
- removed bond from the equation (bridge --> eno1), same result
- host can access external network with no problems using the uplink plugged in 
the bridge
- dhcp server (ISC-DHCP) configured on the host
- stp on the bridge is disabled

Create VM, attach it to the bridge, power it on, boots. Requests IP via
DHCP. The discover can be seen on tcpdump inside the vm, and also on the
tcpdump on the host bridge. DHCP server answers with Offer, that packet
can be seen in the bridge but do not enter the VM.

If I manually put an IP on the VM, it pings the host and the external
world. Mac/ARP resolution seems to be working both ways (arping tested).

Now, if I UNPLUG the uplink from the bridge (leaving only the host
itself with IP on the bridge and one VM plugged on it) then the VM can
get IP via DHCP, the Offer comes in. I'm not sure why it matters having
the uplink when dhcp requests are being answered locally.

After being able to ping externally, if I remove the IP and try DHCP
again, it fails again.

The hardware is a IBM HS23 blade with Emulex 10Gbit cards:

ubuntu@app2maas001p:~$ lspci -v | grep -i net
16:00.0 Ethernet controller: Emulex Corporation OneConnect 10Gb NIC (be3) (rev 
03)
Kernel driver in use: be2net
Kernel modules: be2net
16:00.1 Ethernet controller: Emulex Corporation OneConnect 10Gb NIC (be3) (rev 
03)
Kernel driver in use: be2net
Kernel modules: be2net

I'm verifying if there is firmware updates available but I doubt it. No
extra features (like FCoE, partitioning, etc.) are enabled on the card.
It's a single dual-port mezanine card.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946028

Title:
  DHCP Offer not traversing linux bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1946028/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1910866] Re: nvme drive fails after some time

2021-10-02 Thread Andre Ruiz
I'm seeing this in focal kernel 5.4.0-88. Is this expected? Do I have to
switch to the hwe kernel pointed above to fix this?

The laptop has been stable for a long time and then suddenly started
having this exact symptom a few days ago. I'm wondering if this was
introduced in latest ga kernels for focal or if it was always there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910866

Title:
  nvme drive fails after some time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1910866/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945707] Re: BCM57800 SRIOV bug causes interfaces to disappear

2021-09-30 Thread Andre Ruiz
This seems to be the upstream bug:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214297


** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #214297
   https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214297

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945707

Title:
  BCM57800 SRIOV bug causes interfaces to disappear

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1945707/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945707] [NEW] BCM57800 SRIOV bug causes interfaces to disappear

2021-09-30 Thread Andre Ruiz
Public bug reported:


Works with focal kernel 5.4.0-80
Broken with focal kernel 5.4.0-88

On a Dell R720 with the BCM57800 based 1/10 Gigabit Integrated Network
cards Kernel 5.11.22-3 causes half of the network interfaces to
disappear specifically the 1gb ports. Commands like "ip link show" and
"dmesg" no longer show eno3 and eno4 nor any other interface name for
these ports. I've read the note in the release notes and this does not
appear to be a case of the interface changing names, the 3rd and 4th
interface don't show up at all.

The card is based on the BCM57800 chipset and has two SFP+ and two
gigabit ports on the same card. Commands like "ip link show" no longer
show ports 3 and 4. "lspci" still shows four items. dmesg only shows the
first two interfaces.

This problem seems to be known upstream, and seems to be a regression.

More information at https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3558

This is being seen at a customer during an openstack install. It would
be appreciated if a workaround could be provided or the fix could be
prioritized. Using standard Focal 20.04 LTS kernel (it installs ok with
the working kernel then upgrades to the non-working one -- this is done
through maas and is difficult to control).

Tested other kernels like hwe-* and all seem to be affected too.

Client does not want to disable SRIOV on whole card and also cannot
disable only ports 3/4 (the bios will not allow it).

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945707

Title:
  BCM57800 SRIOV bug causes interfaces to disappear

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1945707/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940750] [NEW] public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY FCEF32E745F2C3D5

2021-08-21 Thread Francis ANDRE
Public bug reported:

Hello

Got the error below when running a apt update command:

fandre@ubuntu-18-04:~$ sudo apt update
[sudo] password for fandre:
Hit:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic InRelease
Hit:2 http://ppa.launchpad.net/webupd8team/java/ubuntu bionic InRelease
Get:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates InRelease [88.7 kB]
Get:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-backports InRelease [74.6 kB]
Get:5 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease [88.7 kB]
Hit:6 https://download.mono-project.com/repo/ubuntu stable-bionic InRelease
Hit:7 https://packages.microsoft.com/ubuntu/18.04/prod bionic InRelease
Ign:8 https://pkg.jenkins.io/debian-stable binary/ InRelease
Get:9 https://pkg.jenkins.io/debian-stable binary/ Release [2044 B]
Get:10 https://pkg.jenkins.io/debian-stable binary/ Release.gpg [833 B]
Err:10 https://pkg.jenkins.io/debian-stable binary/ Release.gpg
  The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not 
available: NO_PUBKEY FCEF32E745F2C3D5
Fetched 253 kB in 2s (157 kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
332 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not 
updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: 
https://pkg.jenkins.io/debian-stable binary/ Release: The following signatures 
couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 
FCEF32E745F2C3D5
W: Failed to fetch https://pkg.jenkins.io/debian-stable/binary/Release.gpg  The 
following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not 
available: NO_PUBKEY FCEF32E745F2C3D5
W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.37
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-136.140-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-136-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.23
Architecture: amd64
CrashDB: ubuntu
Date: Sat Aug 21 18:17:14 2021
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=C.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
Symptom: dist-upgrade
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic dist-upgrade uec-images

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940750

Title:
  public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY FCEF32E745F2C3D5

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1940750/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938068] [NEW] atualização da versão 21.10

2021-07-26 Thread Andre Luis Vaz
Public bug reported:

Description:Ubuntu 20.10
Release:20.10

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:20.10.16
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-63.71-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-63-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.7
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CrashDB: ubuntu
Date: Mon Jul 26 13:45:49 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-03-18 (129 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=pt_BR:pt:en
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to groovy on 2021-07-26 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade groovy third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938068

Title:
  atualização da versão 21.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1938068/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 306673]

2021-06-20 Thread Andre Klapper
GNOME is going to shut down bugzilla.gnome.org in favor of gitlab.gnome.org.
As part of that, we are mass-closing older open tickets in bugzilla.gnome.org
which have not seen updates for a longer time (resources are unfortunately
quite limited so not every ticket can get handled).

If you can still reproduce the situation described in this ticket in a recent
and supported software version of Files (nautilus), then please follow
  https://wiki.gnome.org/GettingInTouch/BugReportingGuidelines
and create a new ticket at
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/

Thank you for your understanding and your help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306673

Title:
  autofs timeout

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/306673/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1746146]

2021-06-20 Thread Andre Klapper
GNOME is going to shut down bugzilla.gnome.org in favor of gitlab.gnome.org.
As part of that, we are mass-closing older open tickets in bugzilla.gnome.org
which have not seen updates for a longer time (resources are unfortunately
quite limited so not every ticket can get handled).

If you can still reproduce the situation described in this ticket in a recent
and supported software version, then please follow
  https://wiki.gnome.org/GettingInTouch/BugReportingGuidelines
and create a new ticket at
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/eog/-/issues/

Thank you for your understanding and your help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1746146

Title:
  eog rotate moves small strip of pixels to other side of image

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eog/+bug/1746146/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1859592] Re: Bluetooth unavailable after updates - Reading Intel version information failed (-110)

2021-06-17 Thread Andre luis
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859592

Title:
  Bluetooth unavailable after updates - Reading Intel version
  information failed (-110)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1859592/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1733322]

2021-06-11 Thread Andre Klapper
GNOME is going to shut down bugzilla.gnome.org in favor of gitlab.gnome.org.
As part of that, we are mass-closing older open tickets in bugzilla.gnome.org
which have not seen updates for a longer time (resources are unfortunately
quite limited so not every ticket can get handled).

If you can still reproduce the situation described in this ticket in a recent
and supported software version, then please follow
  https://wiki.gnome.org/GettingInTouch/BugReportingGuidelines
and create a new bug report at
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues/

Thank you for your understanding and your help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1733322

Title:
  Unable to enable file or screen sharing with unmanaged network
  connection

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1733322/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Ubuntu-BR] Como fazer normalização de som de um conjunto de áudios?

2021-06-10 Thread Andre Cavalcante
Olá a todos, bom dia/tarde/noite...

É isso aí de cima!
Tenho um monte de áudios que preciso colocar como fundo em um quiosque.
O problema: os áudios estão cada um com um volume diferente.
Como fazer para normalizar, isto é, deixar todos os áudios com o mesmo
volume?
Já vi que, com o ffmpeg, a gente pode fazer a normalização, mas de um áudio
só.
Não resolve (e não basta rodar o ffmpeg para todos os áudios).
Alguém tem uma ideia?

Abraços

André Cavalcante
Manaus, AM.
-- 
Mais sobre o Ubuntu em português: http://www.ubuntu-br.org/comece

Lista de discussão Ubuntu Brasil
Histórico, descadastramento e outras opções:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-br


[Bug 1900263]

2021-06-02 Thread Andre Klapper
GNOME is going to shut down bugzilla.gnome.org in favor of gitlab.gnome.org.
As part of that, we are mass-closing older open tickets in bugzilla.gnome.org
which have not seen updates for a longer time (resources are unfortunately
quite limited so not every ticket can get handled).

If you can still reproduce the situation described in this ticket in a recent
and supported software version, then please follow
  https://wiki.gnome.org/GettingInTouch/BugReportingGuidelines
and create a new enhancement request ticket at
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-clocks/-/issues/

Thank you for your understanding and your help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900263

Title:
  In Hebrew environment, clock is reversed: minutes are shown before
  hours

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-desktop/+bug/1900263/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853753]

2021-05-23 Thread Andre Klapper
GNOME is going to shut down bugzilla.gnome.org in favor of gitlab.gnome.org. 
As part of that, we are mass-closing older open tickets in bugzilla.gnome.org 
(resources are unfortunately quite limited so not every ticket can get handled).

If you can still reproduce the situation described in this ticket in a recent
and supported software version, then please follow
  https://wiki.gnome.org/Community/GettingInTouch/BugReportingGuidelines
and create a new enhancement request ticket at
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/issues/

Thank you for your understanding and your help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853753

Title:
  The toolbar can not be edited

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/1853753/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 474687] Re: Gthumb needs a way to edit keyboard shortcuts

2021-03-25 Thread Andre Klapper
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gthumb/-/issues #101
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gthumb/-/issues/101

** Also affects: gthumb via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gthumb/-/issues/101
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474687

Title:
  Gthumb needs a way to edit keyboard shortcuts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gthumb/+bug/474687/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1766938] Re: gnome-shell crashed in mutter:ERROR:x11/iconcache.c:303:standard_pict_format_for_depth: code should not be reached

2021-03-18 Thread Nicholas Andre
For any poor saps that encounter this in the future in a similar
situation, replacing the graphics driver with 'virtio' in the KVM/qemu
config fixes this:


  
  


Instead of the default 'cirrus' or whatever. Found this in my age-old
notes from the last time I encountered this problem a year ago. I'm not
sure whether this triggered a cache clear or whether the bit depth is
different or what...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766938

Title:
  gnome-shell crashed in
  mutter:ERROR:x11/iconcache.c:303:standard_pict_format_for_depth: code
  should not be reached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1766938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1766938] Re: gnome-shell crashed in mutter:ERROR:x11/iconcache.c:303:standard_pict_format_for_depth: code should not be reached

2021-03-18 Thread Nicholas Andre
I get this error which the internet suggests means a problem getting a
core dump. Upping the limits didn't in apport didn't seem to help. I
attached the file in /var/crash

$ ubuntu-bug /var/crash/_usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000.crash

*** Error: Problem in gnome-shell

Sorry, the program "gnome-shell" closed unexpectedly

Your computer does not have enough free memory to automatically analyze
the problem and send a report to the developers.

Press any key to continue...

** Attachment added: "_usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000.crash"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1766938/+attachment/5478034/+files/_usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000.crash

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766938

Title:
  gnome-shell crashed in
  mutter:ERROR:x11/iconcache.c:303:standard_pict_format_for_depth: code
  should not be reached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/1766938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1766938] Re: gnome-shell crashed in standard_pict_format_for_depth()

2021-03-18 Thread Nicholas Andre
I'm seeing this crash on a brand new Ubuntu 18.04 install running on KVM
(the host itself is on 16.04). When I connect via KVM's VNC and try to
open settings app, I get a 100% crash. It's weird because I haven't
installed any additional software.

Mar 18 22:42:11 riv18 org.gnome.Shell.desktop[2561]: **
Mar 18 22:42:11 riv18 org.gnome.Shell.desktop[2561]: 
mutter:ERROR:x11/iconcache.c:303:standard_pict_format_for_depth: code should 
not be reached
Mar 18 22:42:11 riv18 org.gnome.Shell.desktop[2561]: == Stack trace for context 
0x55663fe03320 ==
Mar 18 22:42:11 riv18 gnome-session[2482]: gnome-session-binary[2482]: WARNING: 
Application 'org.gnome.Shell.desktop' killed by signal 6
Mar 18 22:42:11 riv18 gnome-session-binary[2482]: WARNING: Application 
'org.gnome.Shell.desktop' killed by signal 6
Mar 18 22:42:12 riv18 gsd-media-keys[2649]: g_variant_get_va: assertion 'value 
!= NULL' failed
Mar 18 22:42:12 riv18 gsd-media-keys[2649]: g_variant_unref: assertion 'value 
!= NULL' failed
Mar 18 22:42:12 riv18 org.gnome.Shell.desktop[2942]: current session already 
has an ibus-daemon.
Mar 18 22:42:12 riv18 dbus-daemon[445]: [system] Activating via systemd: 
service name='org.freedesktop.GeoClue2' unit='geoclue.service' requested by 
':1.178' (uid=1000 pid=2942 comm="/usr/bin/gnome-shell " label="unconfined")
Mar 18 22:42:12 riv18 systemd[1]: Starting Location Lookup Service...
Mar 18 22:42:13 riv18 dbus-daemon[445]: [system] Successfully activated service 
'org.freedesktop.GeoClue2'
Mar 18 22:42:13 riv18 systemd[1]: Started Location Lookup Service.
Mar 18 22:42:13 riv18 gnome-shell[2942]: Telepathy is not available, chat 
integration will be disabled.
Mar 18 22:42:13 riv18 gsd-media-keys[2649]: g_variant_get_va: assertion 'value 
!= NULL' failed
Mar 18 22:42:13 riv18 gsd-media-keys[2649]: g_variant_unref: assertion 'value 
!= NULL' failed
Mar 18 22:42:13 riv18 gnome-shell[2942]: JS WARNING: 
[/usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/ubuntu-d...@ubuntu.com/appIcons.js 1028]: 
unreachable code after return statement
Mar 18 22:42:13 riv18 org.gnome.Shell.desktop[2942]: **
Mar 18 22:42:13 riv18 org.gnome.Shell.desktop[2942]: 
mutter:ERROR:x11/iconcache.c:303:standard_pict_format_for_depth: code should 
not be reached

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766938

Title:
  gnome-shell crashed in standard_pict_format_for_depth()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1766938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1766938] Re: gnome-shell crashed in standard_pict_format_for_depth()

2021-03-18 Thread Nicholas Andre
I've attached the full logs I see. Can anyone tell me where to look for
more details?

** Attachment added: "ubuntu-logs"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1766938/+attachment/5478029/+files/ubuntu-logs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766938

Title:
  gnome-shell crashed in standard_pict_format_for_depth()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1766938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908139] Re: ThinkPad T14s external display not working on ThinkPad USB-C Dock Gen2

2021-03-10 Thread Andre Plötze
Hi!

Are you sure this is not a hardware issue?

The reason I believe it is a hardware issue is because I observed my
system "drop monitors" on the docking station also under Windows 10 and
even while in the UEFI. Lenovo replaced both the motherboard and the
docking station (and I updated firmware for both multiple times),
however the issue is still present.

You say that for you, the problem does not appear under Windows.
However, note that (at least in my case) this is a sporadic issue, so it
may show up every day or every week or only every one or two months. I
know of absolutely no way to predict or even "provoke" this.

So are you really sure it is not present for Windows, i. e. have you run
the system for MONTHS under Windows and are you sure that your monitors
never went off, even for a second or two?

I just wanna say that it may be very hard to judge whether this bug is
present or not, because it sometimes occurs VERY seldomly. Since I
observed it under both Windows 10 and Ubuntu Linux 20.04 LTS and also
while in UEFI, I'm pretty sure it is not (only) a software issue.
However, I had both motherboard and docking station replaced and it
still occurs, suggesting that it may actually be not just a faulty
component, but an issue in the actual hardware design, in which case it
might affect the entire notebook or even APU series.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908139

Title:
  ThinkPad T14s external display not working on ThinkPad USB-C Dock Gen2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1908139/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899336] Re: Thinkpad T14s (AMD) external monitors on docking station no longer detected

2021-03-10 Thread Andre Plötze
With kernel version 5.6.0-1048-oem, the stack trace looks different, but
the problem is still present.

[ 4881.023648] [ cut here ]
[ 4881.023782] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1113 at 
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dcn20/dcn20_hwseq.c:1555 
dcn20_program_front_end_for_ctx+0x574/0x580 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.023783] Modules linked in: bnep snd_hda_codec_realtek 
snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec_hdmi nls_iso8859_1 snd_hda_intel 
snd_intel_dspcfg soundwire_intel soundwire_generic_allocation soundwire_cadence 
snd_hda_codec snd_soc_dmic snd_acp3x_rn snd_hda_core snd_acp3x_pdm_dma 
soundwire_bus tps6598x snd_soc_core snd_compress ac97_bus iwlmvm 
snd_pcm_dmaengine btusb edac_mce_amd snd_usb_audio btrtl btbcm snd_seq_midi 
snd_usbmidi_lib btintel kvm_amd mac80211 snd_seq_midi_event joydev snd_hwdep 
kvm serio_raw input_leds bluetooth libarc4 snd_rawmidi cdc_ether uvcvideo 
usbnet snd_pcm snd_seq wmi_bmof ecdh_generic videobuf2_vmalloc r8152 
videobuf2_memops ecc videobuf2_v4l2 mii videobuf2_common videodev mc 
thinkpad_acpi ccp iwlwifi snd_seq_device nvram snd_timer snd_rn_pci_acp3x 
ledtrig_audio snd_pci_acp3x cfg80211 snd ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler ucsi_acpi 
soundcore typec_ucsi i2c_multi_instantiate typec mac_hid sch_fq_codel 
parport_pc ppdev lp parport ip_tables x_tables autofs4 hid_generic
[ 4881.023814]  usbhid hid dm_crypt amdgpu rtsx_pci_sdmmc amd_iommu_v2 
crct10dif_pclmul gpu_sched i2c_algo_bit crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel ttm 
aesni_intel drm_kms_helper crypto_simd cryptd syscopyarea glue_helper 
sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops cec psmouse rc_core i2c_piix4 drm nvme r8169 
rtsx_pci nvme_core realtek wmi video i2c_scmi
[ 4881.023834] CPU: 1 PID: 1113 Comm: Xorg Tainted: GW 
5.6.0-1048-oem #52-Ubuntu
[ 4881.023835] Hardware name: LENOVO 20UH001AGE/20UH001AGE, BIOS R1CET61W(1.30 
) 12/21/2020
[ 4881.023951] RIP: 0010:dcn20_program_front_end_for_ctx+0x574/0x580 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.023953] Code: c0 74 cb 4c 89 e2 48 89 df e8 f8 36 dd fa eb be 49 8b 45 
00 8b 90 e4 01 00 00 85 d2 75 d5 8b 86 4c 04 00 00 85 c0 75 cb eb a4 <0f> 0b e9 
14 fb ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41
[ 4881.023954] RSP: 0018:c087019c7810 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 4881.023956] RAX: a07c6bec5c00 RBX: a07c6bf5 RCX: 0008
[ 4881.023957] RDX: 0001 RSI: a07bd83e RDI: a07c6bf5
[ 4881.023958] RBP: c087019c7848 R08: 0001 R09: 
[ 4881.023959] R10: 0001 R11: 0004 R12: a07bd83e
[ 4881.023960] R13: a07bd83e01b8 R14: a07bd83e01b8 R15: 
[ 4881.023962] FS:  7f5369b0ca40() GS:a07c7f84() 
knlGS:
[ 4881.023963] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 80050033
[ 4881.023964] CR2: 55bf4e2329c8 CR3: 0003f6eb2000 CR4: 00340ee0
[ 4881.023965] Call Trace:
[ 4881.024076]  dc_commit_state_no_check+0x2cd/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.024177]  dc_commit_state+0x96/0xb0 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.024287]  amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0x344/0x11d0 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.024387]  ? amdgpu_cgs_read_register+0x14/0x20 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.024484]  ? dm_read_reg_func+0x40/0xc0 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.024576]  ? generic_reg_get+0x22/0x40 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.024582]  ? _cond_resched+0x19/0x30
[ 4881.024658]  ? amdgpu_bo_pin_restricted+0x64/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.024665]  ? ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail+0x2d/0xc0 [ttm]
[ 4881.024668]  ? ww_mutex_unlock+0x26/0x30
[ 4881.024673]  ? ttm_eu_backoff_reservation+0x49/0x70 [ttm]
[ 4881.024748]  ? amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset+0x23/0xa0 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.024852]  ? dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb+0x143/0x270 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.024855]  ? _cond_resched+0x19/0x30
[ 4881.024858]  ? wait_for_completion_timeout+0x3a/0x120
[ 4881.024859]  ? _cond_resched+0x19/0x30
[ 4881.024861]  ? wait_for_completion_interruptible+0x37/0x160
[ 4881.024877]  commit_tail+0x99/0x130 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 4881.024887]  drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x123/0x150 [drm_kms_helper]
[ 4881.024990]  amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit+0x95/0xa0 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.025013]  drm_atomic_commit+0x4a/0x50 [drm]
[ 4881.025031]  drm_atomic_connector_commit_dpms+0xdf/0x100 [drm]
[ 4881.025051]  drm_mode_obj_set_property_ioctl+0x156/0x2d0 [drm]
[ 4881.025070]  ? drm_connector_set_obj_prop+0x90/0x90 [drm]
[ 4881.025086]  drm_connector_property_set_ioctl+0x3b/0x60 [drm]
[ 4881.025103]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xae/0xf0 [drm]
[ 4881.025119]  drm_ioctl+0x234/0x3d0 [drm]
[ 4881.025134]  ? drm_connector_set_obj_prop+0x90/0x90 [drm]
[ 4881.025209]  amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x4e/0x80 [amdgpu]
[ 4881.025213]  ksys_ioctl+0x9d/0xd0
[ 4881.025216]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20
[ 4881.025219]  do_syscall_64+0x57/0x1b0
[ 4881.025223]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[ 4881.025225] RIP: 0033:0x7f5369e6c50b
[ 4881.025227] Code: 0f 1e fa 48 8b 05 85 39 0d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 
c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 
f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 55 39 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 4881.025228] RSP: 

[Bug 1910267] Re: Evolution crash very often doing nothing special ( segfault)

2021-01-30 Thread Andre Klapper
Please provide a backtrace of the crash - see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910267

Title:
  Evolution crash very often doing nothing special ( segfault)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1910267/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >