[Bug 1227425] Re: Cloud images do not need apt-xapian-index
Configuration of cloud images has nothing to do with packaging of aptitude. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1227425 Title: Cloud images do not need apt-xapian-index To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-xapian-index/+bug/1227425/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173904] Re: (un)markauto tries to remove packages unnecessarily
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #142699 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=142699 ** Also affects: aptitude (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=142699 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** No longer affects: aptitude (Debian) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173904 Title: (un)markauto tries to remove packages unnecessarily To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/173904/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1236258] Re: using apt-get gives E: Method gave invalid 200 URI Start message for every repository
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1236258 Title: using apt-get gives E: Method gave invalid 200 URI Start message for every repository To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1236258/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1185262] Re: ubuntu patch no-google-mock is obsolete
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1185262 Title: ubuntu patch no-google-mock is obsolete To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/1185262/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1335006] Re: aptitude: auto-selects wrong packages
On 27 June 2014 17:01, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Enrico Weigelt, metux ITS wrote: Aptitude automatically selects recommended packages. Neither --without-recommends nor setting APT::Install-Recommends seem to have any influence. At least on Debian I'm always using aptitude with APT::Install-Recommends disabled and it works as expected that way. Additionally, we use aptitude-robot with that setting on Precise and Trusty and it works as expected, too. * kick out packages which are just recommended (using apt-get) * start aptitude * press g Sounds like wrong usage/expectations to me. Please kick them out with aptitude instead of apt-get and try again. I'm quite sure, the behaviour you described will be gone. Right, that should at least correct things for now. Background: In comparison to apt-get, aptitude has the feature that you can preselect packages without installing them and then install them later. By default, this happens on the next aptitude call which does install, upgrade or remove something. If you installed the packages in question with aptitude, aptitude may still remember that you told it that you want them once. Yes (even if you did not directly ask for those packages). In this case I think aptitude is confused and some extended state is being persisted that should not be. I believe there is a similar report on bugs.d.o. Conclusion: The only potential issue I see here is that the package states from apt-get are possibly not synced to aptitude in the most intuitive way. A lot of guess work is involved, and it could never be a perfect match for what every user expects. But, yes, some improvement could be made. This may be on purpose, though. At least I'm expecting such behaviour from aptitude and use it to my advantage. Daniel, any insight from you? I agree with your recommendation not to mix apt-get and aptitude, even if there were not a bug here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1335006 Title: aptitude: auto-selects wrong packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/1335006/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1317193] Re: aptitude doesn't correctly report the version of packages available within repositories
This clarifies some things to me, but ( :-) ) it is confusing, since in case the package vanishes from any repository the candidate is shown as none (or keiner in german), indicating there is no package with this name available any more Right, that does seem inconsistent and I see in pkg_columnizer.cc we are special-casing the idea that the package is not available. -- thus it would be more convenient and logical to have the candidate be the one which has the highest available version available in the repositories, not the one which is installed. The concept of a candidate version is defined by apt, and aptitude should not deviate from that (though in this case it currently does). It may be just as clear to remove the special case and report the current/candidate version accurately based on apt instead of none. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New ** Summary changed: - aptitude doesn't correctly report the version of packages available within repositories + aptitude %V displays confusing candidate version or none -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317193 Title: aptitude %V displays confusing candidate version or none To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/1317193/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 968412] Re: Internal error in the solver (multi-arch: foreign packages not considered to solve other-arch dependencies)
Marking as fixed based on my comment #9. See also bug #831768. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968412 Title: Internal error in the solver (multi-arch: foreign packages not considered to solve other-arch dependencies) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/968412/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1317193] Re: aptitude doesn't correctly report the version of packages available within repositories
Next you remove the added repository, by commenting the lines in the above added file out. Then apt-get clean all apt-get update Calling aptitude after will show no updates available. Correct. “No updates” means that the current (installed) version is more recent than any other. Searching for vlc will show the same version as installed and available in the repositories! This is wrong, since the version installed came from the videolan project nightly build and the repository given was disabled! aptitude shall show the version available now not the one installed! On the screenshots the second number is the candidate version. This is similar but not exactly the same thing as the latest version available in configured repositories. From the users manual: [The candidate version is] the version of the package which would be installed if Package → Install (+) were issued on the package … When the currently installed version is more recent than any other that version is also the candidate regardless of what is available in apt repositories. Does that clarify things for you? ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317193 Title: aptitude doesn't correctly report the version of packages available within repositories To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/1317193/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1303214] Re: Misc section description must not say text based
On 6 April 2014 11:05, ianorlin walteror...@gmail.com wrote: I expected the miscellanous text based programs in synaptic to not find graphical programs. Instead I found xcal in the list of miscellanous text based(universe) programs when broswing by category in synaptic. See attached screenshot of properties of thsi package. The package xcal is categorised correctly under section misc. Synaptics description of that section is inconsistent with the rest of the archive and should not state text based. affects ubuntu/synaptic status confirmed See also bug 8952 about the incorrect label of section text. ** Summary changed: - In synaptic package manage xcal is listed in miscellanous text based programs and its description says it is graphical + Misc section description must not say text based ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303214 Title: Misc section description must not say text based To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1303214/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1228868] Re: Feature Req: Improve readability, use 2 spaces between package names
This option will not be added in aptitude. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1228868 Title: Feature Req: Improve readability, use 2 spaces between package names To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1228868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
Incomplete for too long. No detail given why this should be specifically filed against Baltix. ** Changed in: baltix Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768 Title: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptitude/+bug/831768/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled
Oneiric is no longer supported. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768 Title: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptitude/+bug/831768/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1285570] Re: gtk-warning when using synaptic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687 GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not mapped -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285570 Title: gtk-warning when using synaptic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1285570/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 414718] Re: blue on orange is very hard to read in aptitude
On 23 February 2014 14:39, Tomas Pospisek tpo_...@sourcepole.ch wrote: Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2014-02-08 Changed in aptitude: status: New → Incomplete Robots without brains - contraproductive, automatically wasting peoples' time I'm changing status back now LP status change reflects an equivalent change on bugs.d.o. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414718 Title: blue on orange is very hard to read in aptitude To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptitude/+bug/414718/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1208188] Re: [FEATURE] Inititate bug report process from within aptitude
It would be nice to be able to initiate a bug reporting process on a selected package from within aptitude. You mean like launching reportbug with the keypress 'B'? ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208188 Title: [FEATURE] Inititate bug report process from within aptitude To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/1208188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1227425] Re: Cloud images do not need apt-xapian-index
On 08/10/2013 2:42 AM, Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com wrote: I moved this to 'aptitude' as the bug because I'd like to keep aptitude in the images as it is popular with users, but I'd like to *not* have apt-xapian-index or at least have a way that we could turn it off. Aptitude will run fine without axi. affects ubuntu/aptitude status invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1227425 Title: Cloud images do not need apt-xapian-index To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-xapian-index/+bug/1227425/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1216783] [NEW] apt-get download ignores the option -t
On 26/08/2013 3:15 PM, Sworddragon 1216...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Public bug reported: I'm using Ubuntu 13.10 dev with apt 0.9.9.1~ubuntu2. Trying to use the option -t with apt-get download will result as if the option -t was not given. Here is an example which shows that the wrong package was downloaded: -t is not used to directly select versions, but affects the apt priorities. You can read e.g. the man page apt_preferences for the details. What is the output of: $ apt-cache policy -t raring shared-mime-info status incomplete Otherwise, skip the details and use this syntax to directly select the version: $ sudo apt-get download shared-mime-info/raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1216783 Title: apt-get download ignores the option -t To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1216783/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1026939] Re: epix should not be autoremoved
I use epix but running apt-get autoremove as suggested, it reports epix libglewmx1.5 will be removed. Why? What can I do to always keep epix installed? Nothing here to indicate a bug. Use: $ sudo apt-mark unmarkauto epix status invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026939 Title: epix should not be autoremoved To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1026939/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1207713] [NEW] in apt-get the options -y and --force-yes doesn't work with -f option too
On 2 August 2013 19:48, Xava Du xav...@gmail.com wrote: Public bug reported: I was trying to solve some unmet dependency problems, so running apt-get -f -y --force-yes install -y and --force-yes are only for apt prompts. i still have prompts like this, waiting for my input: Configuration file `/etc/apache2/ports.conf' == Modified (by you or by a script) since installation. == Package distributor has shipped an updated version. What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : start a shell to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version. *** ports.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? Installing new version of config file /etc/apache2/mods-available/info.conf ... These prompts are from dpkg and are uneffected by the options (for good reason). See http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/09/21/debian-conffile-configuration-file-managed-by-dpkg/ for information and the section “Avoiding the conffile prompt”. status opinion ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1207713 Title: in apt-get the options -y and --force-yes doesn't work with -f option too To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1207713/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1103541] Re: Please merge aptitude 0.6.8.2-1(main) from Debian unstable (main)
On 2 August 2013 21:26, Dmitrijs Ledkovs launch...@surgut.co.uk wrote: http://people.canonical.com/~stokes/aptitude_0.6.8.2-1ubuntu1.raring.debdiff gives me 404. Was this merge done or not? =) It did previously exist, however, the work was never completed. In a few days 0.6.10 will be uploaded to unstable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103541 Title: Please merge aptitude 0.6.8.2-1(main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/1103541/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1198586] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found
On 21/07/2013 7:00 AM, Toby Lambert tlambert...@gmail.com wrote: Sweet all seemed to update without any problems status invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198586 Title: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1198586/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1198586] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found
On 20 July 2013 08:39, Toby Lambert tlambert...@gmail.com wrote: Seems better toby@toby-VPCCB15FG:~$ ls -l /bin/uname -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27072 Nov 20 2012 /bin/uname Great. Now you should be able to finish installing kernel updates without issue. $ sudo apt-get install -f -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198586 Title: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1198586/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1198586] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found
What is output of $ ls -l /bin/uname $ apt-cache policy coreutils ** Summary changed: - package linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic 3.5.0-36.57~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal exited with return code 127 + /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198586 Title: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1198586/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1202001] Re: aptitude show doesn't work for some existing packages
On 17 July 2013 19:27, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote: Indeed, fdflush only exists for the i386 architecture, see http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=fdflush Right. This will be taken care of when apt cacheset branch is merged. assignee wigs ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Hartwig (wigs) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202001 Title: aptitude show doesn't work without architecture suffix even if the package is available only in one (foreign) architecture To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/1202001/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1198586] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found
On 19 July 2013 14:27, Toby Lambert tlambert...@gmail.com wrote: toby@toby-VPCCB15FG:~$ ls -l /bin/uname ls: cannot access /bin/uname: No such file or directory Uh oh. Is that what you wanted? It is. Please try: $ sudo apt-get install --reinstall uname or otherwise use dpkg to reinstall that package. A subsequent run of apt-get may then work without the apt-auto-removal error. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198586 Title: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1198586/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1198586] Re: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found
On 19 July 2013 15:39, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote: $ sudo apt-get install --reinstall uname That should be: $ sudo apt-get install --reinstall coreutils -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198586 Title: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal: uname: not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1198586/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1202001] [NEW] aptitude show doesn't work for some existing packages
On 17 July 2013 07:40, Reuben Thomas r...@sc3d.org wrote: Public bug reported: Running aptitude show fdflush doesn't work, even though there's a package fdflush. I checked my spelling very carefully. apt-cache search fdflush works fine. aptitude show works fine for other package names I tried it with. Provide the full output of these commands: $ apt-cache policy fdflush $ apt-cache search fdflush $ aptitude show fdflush status incomplete ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202001 Title: aptitude show doesn't work for some existing packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/1202001/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1201279] [NEW] google-mock and libgtest-dev out of sync
Public bug reported: google-mock 1.6.0+svn437-0ubuntu1 gtest 1.6.0-1ubuntu6 The recent upload of this google-mock version continues to be out of sync and incompatible with the Debian packaging. The Debian package is setup to use the corresponding libgtest-dev package, which has to be in sync. The current Ubuntu version notes in the changelog that the internal copy of gtest must be used, however, contradicts this advice in README.Debian: -- With this Debian package something like the following should be enough to build a static library (which also includes gtest): g++ -I/usr/src/gmock -c /usr/src/gmock/src/gmock-all.cc g++ -I/usr/src/gtest -c /usr/src/gtest/src/gtest-all.cc ar -rv libgmock.a gmock-all.o gtest-all.o -- Packages that build fine using the Debian versions may fail due to the incompatability between the packages. Please keep these packages in sync with each other, and the corresponding Debian versions. There is no need to ship prerelease svn snapshots, and any deviation from the Debian packaging only creates problems. ** Affects: google-mock (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: gtest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gtest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201279 Title: google-mock and libgtest-dev out of sync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-mock/+bug/1201279/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1201279] Re: google-mock and libgtest-dev out of sync
google-mock 1.6.0+svn437-0ubuntu1 This version uses gtest r655 [1] that is recently uploaded to sid as gtest 1.7.0~svn20130629-2 [2]. Please merge this version of gtest to resolve the issue. [1] http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/source/detail?r=437 [2] http://code.google.com/p/googletest/source/detail?r=655 ** Changed in: google-mock (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201279 Title: google-mock and libgtest-dev out of sync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-mock/+bug/1201279/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1201279] Re: merge gtest 1.7.0~svn20130629-2
** Summary changed: - google-mock and libgtest-dev out of sync + merge gtest 1.7.0~svn20130629-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201279 Title: merge gtest 1.7.0~svn20130629-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-mock/+bug/1201279/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1201208] [NEW] aptitude FTBFS with missing google-mock
On 15 July 2013 06:40, Stephen Michael Kellat skel...@fastmail.net wrote: Public bug reported: Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/716828: Package: aptitude Version: 0.6.8.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, [building] aptitude in plain sid (both on mipsel and amd64) ends with: Failing to build on sid is not an Ubuntu issue. affects ubuntu/aptitude status invalid ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201208 Title: aptitude FTBFS with missing google-mock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/1201208/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1199823] Re: A seemingly harmless assertion error, but ...
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687 GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not mapped -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199823 Title: A seemingly harmless assertion error, but ... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1199823/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1178909] Re: Bottom of description window concealed in synaptic with Openbox
On 2 July 2013 16:36, Jane Atkinson 1178...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I'm not observing this issue any more after recent updates. Thank you for the update. status invalid ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1178909 Title: Bottom of description window concealed in synaptic with Openbox To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1178909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1
On 30 June 2013 04:28, Redoubts redou...@gmail.com wrote: To confuse matters, the kernel images include apparently more recent images: 3.5.0-28-generic .. Technically, that's the older kernel from Ubuntu 12.10; note the 3.5, vs 3.8 for others. Regarding your rhetorical part, we should also complain here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/923876 No, that is a feature request which is already implemented. Any person who believes it is not working for them should file a _new_ report, and specific cases will be investigated. Note that you must run ‘apt-get autoremove’ periodically to clean up the old images, and that kernel images installed prior to some version of apt will still have to be removed manually. This report concerns only the situation of Gary Shook, that is now resolved by other means. No bug was identified hence this is marked invalid. If you are unwilling to file a new bug report there is not much that will be done to assist you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191389 Title: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1191389/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1186441] Re: synaptic does not run
On 29 June 2013 06:56, ill 1186...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I just tried the command again, and now I get: # /usr/bin/synaptic-pkexec That command should be run as the desktop user, not root. The prompt (#) indicates running as root. If you run as the logged in user, then it should work as you previously reported. You have not answered another question: which terminal program are you using when you run these commands? (gnome-terminal, konsole, xterm, etc.) This error: No protocol specified No protocol specified (synaptic:3106): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0 indicates that the active user on that terminal (root) is not authorized to access the display for the logged in user (that is, the desktop user). This is not a bug, but a security feature. You can seek help on authorization elsewhere, perhaps by consulting the xauth(1) and xhost(1) manuals. affects ubuntu/synaptic status invalid ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186441 Title: synaptic does not run To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdesudo/+bug/1186441/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1195568] [NEW] glib2.0 2.37.3-1ubuntu1: invalid changelog entry format
On 28 June 2013 16:17, Iain Lane i...@orangesquash.org.uk wrote: I'm guessing you got that from the changes file (or Launchpad's view of it)? Those aren't quite the same as Debian changelogs, although obviously they are parsed from them. Yes, from Launchpad. I see. Ok. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195568 Title: glib2.0 2.37.3-1ubuntu1: invalid changelog entry format To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1195568/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 880003] Re: Synaptic displays An error occurred
On 27 June 2013 12:03, Flavio Martins Prado flavio.mpr...@gmail.com wrote: The problem is probably caused by a configuration of synaptic saved on the ROOT directory. After purging synaptic, the configuration files should be removed, but they aren't... I coud find a .synaptic in root and in my home directory. This should be considered another bug, or this is an acceptable behavior? I think purging a package should delete ALL config files... No. Purging a package removes log and system configuration files, but must never touch files in a users home directory (such as ‘/root’). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880003 Title: Synaptic displays An error occurred To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/880003/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1195069] Re: error when upgrade packages
2013/6/27 Daniel Letzeisen 1195...@bugs.launchpad.net: ** Package changed: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) = apt (Ubuntu) Some more effort in triage, please. Apt is not a dumping ground for bugs. BlackStarMI wrote (delocalized): dpkg: error: file triggers record mentions illegal package name `libglib2.0-0' (for interest in file `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gio/modules'): libglib2.0-0 indicates either dpkg or the package owning that trigger (glib2.0). No system or version information is indicated. Run the command: $ apport-collect 1195069 In future, please report bugs using ‘ubuntu-bug’. affects ubuntu/apt status invalid affects ubuntu/dpkg status incomplete affects ubuntu/glib2.0 status incomplete ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Also affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Incomplete ** Also affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195069 Title: error when upgrade packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1195069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1195568] [NEW] glib2.0 2.37.3-1ubuntu1: invalid changelog entry format
Public bug reported: The changelog entry for 2.37.3-1ubuntu1 is unterminated [1], flowing in to the next entry for the unreleased debian changes. The following does not conform to changelog format as defined by debian-policy [2]: glib2.0 (2.37.3-1ubuntu1) saucy; urgency=low * Resynchronise on unrelease Debian SVN (glib is in NEW there). Remaining change: - Build-Depend on python:any for cross building. glib2.0 (2.37.3-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low * libglib2.0-tests: Depend on shared-mime-info required by contenttype test. * New upstream release * 0001-Revert-g_file_set_contents-don-t-fsync-on-ext3-4.patch: Drop, now upstream. * debian/tests/installed-tests: Add a new DEP-8 test to run the installed-tests. Doesn't use the test runner yet as this isn't packaged. * Refresh patches. * Update symbols file. -- Iain Lane iain.l...@canonical.com Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:43:56 +0100 [1] Resulting in perhaps parser errors, for example (perhaps unrelated) http://packages.ubuntu.com/source/saucy/glib2.0 fails to list the binary packages built by this source. [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-dpkgchangelog ** Affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1195568 Title: glib2.0 2.37.3-1ubuntu1: invalid changelog entry format To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1195568/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 919521] Re: apturl says index is broken when it is not
** Changed in: apturl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919521 Title: apturl says index is broken when it is not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apturl/+bug/919521/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1193513] Re: updates do not install
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) = debconf (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193513 Title: updates do not install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debconf/+bug/1193513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 919521] Re: apturl says index is broken when it is not
On 22 June 2013 06:57, ill 919...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I get a message saying package installation failed: man-db subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Those two lines are the _complete_ output from the command? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919521 Title: apturl says index is broken when it is not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apturl/+bug/919521/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 919521] Re: apturl says index is broken when it is not
And I repeat my other queries: [Do you] get this error with any URI, or only some specific ones? Please give an example of a failing URI. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919521 Title: apturl says index is broken when it is not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apturl/+bug/919521/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1186441] Re: synaptic does not run
On 22 June 2013 06:47, ill 1186...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: kubuntu 13.10, synaptic .80 yes the command starts synaptic. Looks like an issue with kdesudo, or perhaps your terminal environment. Which terminal are you using (konsole, gnome-terminal, etc.)? affects ubuntu/synaptic status invalid affects ubuntu/kdesudo status new ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Also affects: kdesudo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186441 Title: synaptic does not run To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdesudo/+bug/1186441/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 919216] Re: aptitude returns 0 exit status code even if the requested action is not successful
On 20 June 2013 13:41, Marshall McMullen 919...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I'm still seeing this exact problem on ubuntu 13.04. So I don't see how this is fixed. ‘Fix Committed’ and ‘Fix Released’ are different; there is no claim that this is fixed in Ubuntu. This particular issue is resolved in an experimental development branch that has not yet been ported to the mainline. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919216 Title: aptitude returns 0 exit status code even if the requested action is not successful To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptitude/+bug/919216/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1
On 19 June 2013 23:39, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 June 2013 09:41, Gary Shook garyfsh...@gmail.com wrote:
I cleaned it up using the following:
dpkg -l linux-* | awk '/^ii/{ print $2}' | grep -v -e `uname -r | cut -f1,2
-d-` | grep -e [0-9] | xargs sudo apt-get -y purge
I donn't have the output before cleanup, but I can tell you it was a bunch
of old kernel images.
In previous versions old kernal images would not be subject to
automatical removal by default, that was changed recently. It is
possible that these old kernal images were installed before the
change, and as such required to be cleaned up manually. That being
the case the issue should not recur, and please let us know if it does
so that we can track down the cause.
status invalid
As said, please reopen if the problem recurs and we can attempt to
track it down. Remember to obtain the requested information before
you repair the system.
Thanks
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191389
Title:
package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to
install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools
exited with return code 1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1191389/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923876] Re: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS
apt 0.9.7.5ubuntu5.4 ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923876 Title: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/923876/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 923876] Re: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS
On 21 June 2013 02:09, John Karahalis john.karaha...@gmail.com wrote: Still have this issue on a fresh install of Raring. Note that kernel images installed before this change was made in apt 0.9.7.6ubuntu1 will still have to be removed manually. If you find that subsequent kernel images are not cleaned up, then please file a new report using ‘ubuntu-bug’. Such report should contain details of how the system is updated, such as whether you use any of apt-get, unattended-upgrades, update-manager, aptitude, etc.. On 21 June 2013 05:00, Tim Fisher k2...@null.net wrote: Can confirm @John's statement - exists for me in Raring as well. Likewise. Always file regression reports as new issues that can be investigated individually. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923876 Title: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/923876/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1
On 19 June 2013 09:41, Gary Shook garyfsh...@gmail.com wrote:
I cleaned it up using the following:
dpkg -l linux-* | awk '/^ii/{ print $2}' | grep -v -e `uname -r | cut -f1,2
-d-` | grep -e [0-9] | xargs sudo apt-get -y purge
I donn't have the output before cleanup, but I can tell you it was a bunch
of old kernel images.
In previous versions old kernal images would not be subject to
automatical removal by default, that was changed recently. It is
possible that these old kernal images were installed before the
change, and as such required to be cleaned up manually. That being
the case the issue should not recur, and please let us know if it does
so that we can track down the cause.
my system works, but I'm getting a System Error message on bootup,
would a re-install or repair from 13.04 disk fix this?
You should seek support on an appropriate forum. See
http://www.ubuntu.com/support/.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191389
Title:
package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to
install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools
exited with return code 1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1191389/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1
On 19 June 2013 14:30, Michael McAndrew 1191...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I then rebooted and did an 'ls -lR /boot' and a 'sudo aptitude-upgrade' As you are using aptitude to upgrade old kernel images will not be automatically removed (bug #923876). Those should be removed manually to free up the space. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191389 Title: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1191389/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191973] Re: Spams *session log with Gtk-WARNING **: GtkNotebook 0x1e734d0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1e86140 is not mapped
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687 GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not mapped -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191973 Title: Spams *session log with Gtk-WARNING **: GtkNotebook 0x1e734d0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1e86140 is not mapped To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1191973/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1
On 19/06/2013 8:51 AM, Gary Shook garyfsh...@gmail.com wrote: I do not use aptitude, and do not have unattended-upgrades installed. at this point, I get a system error on boot, and just need to fix it... I cleaned up /boot it had no space left. How did you clean it up, by removing files or using apt-get to remove old packages? I need to improve my boot maintenance. here is the output after cleanup: /boot: We needed the output before any cleanup, to know what was filling it. Was it old kernel images? If your system now works you can mark this report as invalid. Otherwise we will need precise information to recreate the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191389 Title: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1191389/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1
Redoubts, your issue may not be the same cause, so please file a new report using ‘ubuntu-bug’, including the information here, and also some comments on how you install and update software (e.g. apt-get, aptitude, software-center). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191389 Title: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1191389/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191389] Re: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1
Gary Shook, do you at all use aptitude or have unattended-upgrades installed? Please provide the output of: $ ls -lR boot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191389 Title: package linux-image-extra-3.8.0-25-generic 3.8.0-25.37 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1191389/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 111566] Re: adept dist-upgrade now dialog needs choice for do_not_remind_me_again
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 75332 aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111566 Title: adept dist-upgrade now dialog needs choice for do_not_remind_me_again To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adept/+bug/111566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75332] Re: Held back packages not ignored by update-manager
No program is encouraged to interface with aptitude holds, these are very soon to be replaced by the universal dpkg holds. ** Changed in: update-manager Status: New = Invalid ** Summary changed: - Held back packages not ignored by update-manager + aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75332 Title: aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/update-manager/+bug/75332/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63540] Re: don't show updates for locked packages
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 42178 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42178 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 75332 aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 42178 synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63540 Title: don't show updates for locked packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adept/+bug/63540/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 113846] Re: Adept notifier with pinning
Daniel Hahler (blueyed) wrote on 2007-12-17: This sounds like a duplicate of bug 72806 (pinned packages are held) and I'm marking it as such. No, apt_preferences(5) and package holds are two separate concepts with different use cases. Unmarking duplicate. It may however have been fixed in the mean time. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 75332 aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg ** Changed in: adeptmgr Importance: Unknown = Undecided ** Changed in: adeptmgr Status: In Progress = New ** Changed in: adeptmgr Remote watch: KDE Bug Tracking System #122007 = None ** Bug watch removed: KDE Bug Tracking System #122007 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122007 ** Changed in: adept (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113846 Title: Adept notifier with pinning; apt_preferences(5) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/adeptmgr/+bug/113846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 113846] Re: Adept notifier with pinning
Previous KDE bugwatch was not correct (related to held packages, not preferences). Further, if adept notifier is ignoring apt_preferences that is a bug, not wishlist item. ** Summary changed: - Adept notifier with pinning + Adept notifier with pinning; apt_preferences(5) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113846 Title: Adept notifier with pinning; apt_preferences(5) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/adeptmgr/+bug/113846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 185397] Re: adept: management of package versions in Kubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 118474 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118474 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 75332 aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 118474 Adept should allow to ignore updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185397 Title: adept: management of package versions in Kubuntu. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adept/+bug/185397/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118474] Re: Adept should allow to ignore updates
Richard Birnie (rbirnie-deactivatedaccount) wrote on 2007-07-01: What you're describing is basically version pinning which has been requested in bug 113846. The other bug is reporting that apt_preferences(5) are ignored. This request is to add a feature to the adept notifier interface so that a user can select a presented update and ignore it. Such a feature may be implemented with apt_preferences(5), or more preferable using dpkg holds, however, that does not make this a duplicate. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 75332 aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118474 Title: Adept should allow to ignore updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adept/+bug/118474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923876] Re: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS
Untested and dont care. ** Patch added: aptitude-saucy.diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/923876/+attachment/3705236/+files/aptitude-saucy.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923876 Title: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/923876/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1014831] Re: can not remove ldlinux.sys; sudo rm -Rf ldlinux.sys
On 14 June 2013 04:30, ill 1014...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: It was already removed after I did the chattr command. Next time, if someone asks for output from commands please take care that you do it before resolving the problem. Otherwise the output is useless. In any case, it is clear now that the file in question was immutable. Immutable is an attribute intended to prevent potentially indiscriminant actions from removing or modifying certain files. Use of 'rm -f' is a potentially indiscriminant action and therefore is not a bug that this command will not remove an immutable file, even when asked specially to act on that file. status invalid This is not the forum to explain further. If you like more information please ask on one of the support channels at http://www.ubuntu.com/support, perhaps IRC or web forums. This is absolutely not a bug. ** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014831 Title: can not remove ldlinux.sys; sudo rm -Rf ldlinux.sys To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1014831/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1093922] Re: removing modules causes network problems
ill, does the patch on bug 1084190 resolve the issue you report here or not? It is not constructive to change bug tags and status without answering these simple questions. On 13 June 2013 03:30, ill 1093...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Tags added: kernel-unable-to-test-upstream ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093922 Title: removing modules causes network problems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1093922/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093922 Title: removing modules causes network problems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1093922/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1093922] Re: removing modules causes network problems
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1084190 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084190 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1084190 kernel panic when removing mceusb module -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093922 Title: removing modules causes network problems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1093922/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1050240] Re: aptitude install PATTERN without ~r installs conflicting packages for all architectures
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Hartwig (wigs) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1050240 Title: aptitude install PATTERN without ~r installs conflicting packages for all architectures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptitude/+bug/1050240/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 844245] Re: Apt should produce a more meaningful warning when different architectures have different versions of a multiarch package
On 25 May 2013 22:58, dino99 844...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid Yes well this particular issue persists and the suggestion is useful. status confirmed ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844245 Title: Apt should produce a more meaningful warning when different architectures have different versions of a multiarch package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/844245/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1093922] Re: removing modules causes network problems
On 11 June 2013 04:33, ill 1093...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: It has been tested now. And does that patch resolve the issue you reporting on this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093922 Title: removing modules causes network problems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1093922/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1189494] [NEW] cannot intall any ia32 libs because libgraphite2-3:i386 is broken
On 10 June 2013 22:34, Christian Smith 1189...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgraphite2-3 : Conflicts: libgraphite2-3:i386 but 1.2.1-1 is to be installed. libgraphite2-3:i386 : Conflicts: libgraphite2-3 but 1.2.1-1 is installed. That is not aptitudes fault. The maintainer of that package has been twiddling the multiarch support; 1.2.2-1 has it enabled again. status invalid ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1189494 Title: cannot intall any ia32 libs because libgraphite2-3:i386 is broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/1189494/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1188266] [NEW] K address book Program disappeared
On 7 June 2013 00:10, Sunflower 1188...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Public bug reported: I had 5-6 contacts in the K address book. This program would not open. Thus, I uninstalled it, to reinstall. It will not. You have not specified which version of synaptic and ubuntu you are using. Always use ‘ubuntu-bug’ to report issues. status incomplete What does “it will not” mean? Is there some error message displayed when you try? Is the program absent from the list of software? Note that kaddressbook moved to universe in quantal. What is the output from these commands: $ apt-cache policy $ dpkg -l kaddressbook $ sudo apt-get install kaddressbook ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1188266 Title: K address book Program disappeared To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1188266/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 848668] Re: apt-get remove breaks system when removing Wine
I discovered a possible bug in the apt-get remove command, it actually broke my whole system, and removed all my packages. Well, you pretty much asked it to, so that is not a bug. status invalid I was trying to remove Wine 1.3 devel from my machine. This package contains several other packages such as winetricks. So instead of removing them one-by-one, I ran the following command: sudo apt-get remove win* I double checked before this, by hitting the TAB twice after typing win. Bash-completion is not a proper verification of the actions that apt-get will take. Either use ‘apt-get --simulate …’, or read the summary that apt presents before asking whether to proceed. There was supposed to be only 3 packages here. Maybe in your mind, but not apts. Quoting the manual: If no package matches the given expression and the expression contains one of '.', '?' or '*' then it is assumed to be a POSIX regular expression, and it is applied to all package names in the database. Any matches are then installed (or removed). Note that matching is done by substring so 'lo.*' matches 'how-lo' and 'lowest'. If this is undesired, anchor the regular expression with a '^' or '$' character, or create a more specific regular expression. Here ‘win*’ is a regular expression matching anywhere in the package name. Any package whose name contains ‘wi’, which is perhaps quite a few packages. Removing any non-trivial amount of packages generally requires also removing many more, due to broken dependencies. Apt is a system administration tool. Do not submit commands to it without understand what those commands instruct. But after submitting the command, it actually started removing packages like: gtk+, gwibber, then the kernels, evolution etc. At this time it was too late to cancel the procedure. Was there no summary of the actions followed by a prompt asking wheter to proceed? The win* expression should cover only those packages those name is starting with win. Instead it considered * to be for every package. As explained above. You have this very wrong. The expression you are looking for in this case is “^win.*”. Solution for this “bug” is to read the manual and disable options such as Apt::Get::Assume-Yes, and Apt::Get::Force-Yes. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848668 Title: apt-get remove breaks system when removing Wine To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/848668/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1175637] Re: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed
unattended-upgrade does not directly handle dependencies, and its only effective calls are to ‘mark_upgrade’. 08:36 slangasek ah, there's a single call to mark_install() in u-a, so that would be nice and convenient if so In ‘upgrade_in_minimal_steps’, but conditional on: elif not pkg.is_installed: pkg.mark_install() so only called if somehow a not-installed package ends up in pkgs_to_upgrade inside main. There are many unconditional calls to pkg.mark_upgrade that should generate a python-apt error for a not-installed package in that list. In any case, looking at the log Brian provided, linux-image-3.2.0-44-generic is the package of interest, yet does not appear in pkgs_to_upgrade (see the second to last line of the log, starting “Packages that are upgraded:”). 08:35 cjwatson mark_install(from_user=False) I think? But check ... This is a too common misconception. ‘FromUser’ is concerned with other functions, such as whether to override a hold or not. It must never be used strictly for the side-effect of maybe setting auto-installed. The only proper way to explicitly mark a package auto-installed is to call ‘MarkInstall’ followed by ‘MarkAuto’, and most programs need not be concerned with that unless e.g. they include their own dependency solver. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175637 Title: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1175637/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1175637] Re: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed
On 6 June 2013 11:14, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote: In ‘upgrade_in_minimal_steps’, but conditional on: elif not pkg.is_installed: pkg.mark_install() Also unrelated, though this call should be removed based on my earlier reasoning that it is never used. Otherwise, even though it is unused, it should have ‘from_user=False’ to indicate that these requests are not coming directly from the user and avoid issues with e.g. overriding holds. However, unattended-upgrades (and indeed any program using python-apt) will still inappropriately override holds due to http://bugs.debian.org/686726. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175637 Title: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1175637/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1175637] Re: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #686726 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686726 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175637 Title: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1175637/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1175637] Re: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed
** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #686726 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686726 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175637 Title: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1175637/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1075841] Re: read/write selections (markings) causes loss of auto-installed status
Revert unexplained spam. ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075841 Title: read/write selections (markings) causes loss of auto-installed status To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1075841/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1175637] Re: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed
‘MarkInstall’ has changed quite a bit since version in precise, including much in the ways of handling auto-installed. Can someone provide an apt log with Debug::pkgDepCache::Marker and Debug::pkgDepCache::AutoInstall set. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175637 Title: Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1175637/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1075366] Re: Never-MarkAuto-Sections:: oldlibs gives wrong behavior
Agreeing with Steve, this is an obviously incorrect application of Never-MarkAuto-Sections. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075366 Title: Never-MarkAuto-Sections:: oldlibs gives wrong behavior To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1075366/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1084190] Re: ubuntu has kernel panic when manually removing modules
Patch from http://people.canonical.com/~henrix/lp1084190/v1/. ** Patch added: 0001-mceusb-Fix-race-in-mceusb_dev_disconnect.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1084190/+attachment/3694043/+files/0001-mceusb-Fix-race-in-mceusb_dev_disconnect.patch ** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084190 Title: ubuntu has kernel panic when manually removing modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1084190/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 994152] Re: do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade
** Description changed: + I am also having this problem. + + $ sudo do-release-upgrade + Checking for a new Ubuntu release + Get:1 Upgrade tool signature [198 B] + Get:2 Upgrade tool [1,206 kB] + Fetched 1,206 kB in 0s (0 B/s) + authenticate 'raring.tar.gz' against 'raring.tar.gz.gpg' + extracting 'raring.tar.gz' + Can not run the upgrade + The error message is 'No such file or directory'. + + * Original Description + + [The originally reported error “/tmp is mounted noexec” is not a bug.] + Whenever attempting to run do-release-upgrade I get an error: - $ do-release-upgrade + $ do-release-upgrade Checking for a new ubuntu release - Get:1 Upgrade tool signature [198 B] - Get:2 Upgrade tool [1550 kB] - Fetched 1550 kB in 0s (0 B/s) - authenticate 'precise.tar.gz' against 'precise.tar.gz.gpg' + Get:1 Upgrade tool signature [198 B] + Get:2 Upgrade tool [1550 kB] + Fetched 1550 kB in 0s (0 B/s) + authenticate 'precise.tar.gz' against 'precise.tar.gz.gpg' extracting 'precise.tar.gz' Can not run the upgrade This usually is caused by a system where /tmp is mounted noexec. Please remount without noexec and run the upgrade again. - I have checked /tmp $ ls -l / |grep tmp drwxrwxrwt 15 root root 360 2012-05-03 13:00 tmp which is obviously not mounted noexec. + + [This is not the proper way to check noexec, use ‘mount’.] ** Summary changed: - do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade + do-release-upgrade: Can not run the upgrade, 'No such file or directory'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994152 Title: do-release-upgrade: Can not run the upgrade, 'No such file or directory'. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/994152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1084190] Re: kernel panic when removing mceusb module
** Summary changed: - ubuntu has kernel panic when manually removing modules + kernel panic when removing mceusb module -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084190 Title: kernel panic when removing mceusb module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1084190/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 994152] Re: do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade
This started happening to me again when trying to upgrade to 13.04. What did? The problem with noexec? status:New → Confirmed Again, please do not confirm your own bugs. It has already been explained that the issue on your system with noexec is not a bug. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994152 Title: do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/994152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1058790] Re: package does not uninstall
On 2 June 2013 15:02, ill 1058...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: apt-get is provided by the official ubuntu repos. It has already been explained why apt is not at fault here and will not be adapted to handle this kind of breakage. The problem is in the package ‘brscan2’ which Ubuntu does not provide. In comment #4 there are links to several methods you can use to recover your system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058790 Title: package does not uninstall To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1058790/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 994152] Re: do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade
The status of ‘new’ is for ubuntu-release-upgrader to verify the issue reported by Richard Cheung. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994152 Title: do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/994152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1084190] Re: ubuntu has kernel panic when manually removing modules
Please test the proposed fix. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084190 Title: ubuntu has kernel panic when manually removing modules To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1084190/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 919521] Re: apturl says index is broken when it is not
You get this error with any URI, or only some specific ones? Please give an example of a failing URI. What is the output of running this command in a terminal: $ sudo apturl apt:tf ** Changed in: apturl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919521 Title: apturl says index is broken when it is not To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apturl/+bug/919521/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228264] Re: [MASTER] non-existing section 'web' added to sources.list by apturl (update gutsy to hardy fails cos archives not found)
** Changed in: apturl (Ubuntu) Assignee: j4v13r (j4v13r) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228264 Title: [MASTER] non-existing section 'web' added to sources.list by apturl (update gutsy to hardy fails cos archives not found) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apturl/+bug/228264/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1093922] Re: removing modules causes network problems
ever since 12.10, whenever I remove the module mceusb using rmmod mceusb, This sounds very similar to your report bug #1084190. On that report there is a patched kernel that you are yet to test. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093922 Title: removing modules causes network problems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1093922/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035541] Re: machine locks up, requiring hard restart
You report similar issues as bug #1084190 and bug #1093922. Is this lock up also related to removing the mceusb module? If not, provide the information requested in comment #3. ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Adrian Perez (apere125) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035541 Title: machine locks up, requiring hard restart To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1035541/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 994152] Re: do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade
On 2 June 2013 15:59, Richard Cheung 994...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Hi, I have found a solution. sudo apt-get install python-apt After this, do-release-upgrade does work for you? Which version of python-apt did you upgrade from and to? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994152 Title: do-release-upgrade says it can not run the upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/994152/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1014831] Re: can not remove ldlinux.sys; sudo rm -Rf ldlinux.sys
** Summary changed: - sudo rm -R filename does not remove a file + can not remove ldlinux.sys; sudo rm -Rf ldlinux.sys ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed = New ** Package changed: ubuntu = coreutils (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014831 Title: can not remove ldlinux.sys; sudo rm -Rf ldlinux.sys To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1014831/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1014831] Re: can not remove ldlinux.sys; sudo rm -Rf ldlinux.sys
What filesystem is this drive using? Provide output from ‘mount’ to confirm. Provide the complete output from executing: $ sudo rm -f ldlinux.sys Operation not permitted? Most likely cause of that on this file is attribute immutable. Remove it with: $ sudo chattr -i ldlinux.sys ** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014831 Title: can not remove ldlinux.sys; sudo rm -Rf ldlinux.sys To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1014831/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930369] Re: apt-get update does not fix duplicat sources
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems And it says that running apt-get update will fix these problems, but it does not. The intent of that message — which is not completely clear — is that running ‘apt-get update’ may resolve general issues. It is not specifically about the duplicate source entry warning, and you should reasonably expect that apt will not modify sources.list, so you have to update that file yourself. ** Package changed: ia32-libs-tools (Ubuntu) = apt (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930369 Title: apt-get update does not fix duplicat sources To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/930369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1186441] Re: synaptic does not run
You must state the version of Ubuntu and synaptic you are using. What is the output of running: $ /usr/bin/synaptic-pkexec Does that command properly start synaptic? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186441 Title: synaptic does not run To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/1186441/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 844196] Re: --ignore-missing doesn't work on apt-get download
For example apt-get download --ignore-missing htop ia33-libs will stop on ia33-libs because the package doesn't exist but htop will not be downloaded then too. Ignore missing applies to packages that fail to download correctly but are otherwise known to apt. The command issued is valid, but would not continue due to transient errors.. In the reported case the package ‘ia33-libs’ is not known to apt, and the command is invalid. That is an entirely different situation than --ignore-missing is intended for and should not be included in its scope. In my opinion apt should not include an option to support such invalid commands, even if the package is only temporarily unknown due to removed sources or e.g. removal from the archive. It is nonsense to ask the impossible of administrative commands and they should rightly fail. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Opinion ** Changed in: apt (Debian) Status: New = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844196 Title: --ignore-missing doesn't work on apt-get download To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/844196/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 988772] Re: apt-get --only-upgrade install $PKG installs new packages
The documentation makes clear that ‘--only-upgrade’ applies its restriction to the packages specified on the command line only. Its purpose is to prevent the user accidentally asking for new software. It is not intended to restrict upgrades of existing software including e.g. if such an upgrade requires a new dependency to be installed. I do not believe ‘--only-upgrade’ should have its scope changed as requested. Aptitude supports a ‘--no-new-installs’ option to achieve the desired behaviour, however, after some consideration of the matters I do not believe that it is useful enough to justify the additional complexity in the implementation. ** Summary changed: - apt-get --only-upgrade install $PKG installs new packages + 'apt-get install --only-upgrade' should prevent installing new dependencies ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988772 Title: 'apt-get install --only-upgrade' should prevent installing new dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/988772/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 844485] Re: apt-get man page language/grammar improvement for autoremove
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844485 Title: apt-get man page language/grammar improvement for autoremove To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/844485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 844196] Re: --ignore-missing doesn't work on apt-get download
On 1 June 2013 16:21, Sworddragon 844...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: The command itself is not invalid because the package names are just arguments. The arguments of ‘apt-get install’ are defined to be packages, ‘ia33-libs’ does not name any package, hence the command line /as a whole/ is invalid. In my opinion --ignore-missing should continue if a package isn't available. The reason for this is simple: ignore-missing implies that it will ignore any missing package - otherwise the option should get a more descriptive name. Semantics. ‘Missing’ can just as easily be interpretted as the package exists (is known to apt) but not available in local storage. In any case, the meaning and behaviour of options is defined in the manual and not by what any particular user may choose to infer from the name. Nowhere does the manual indicate that unknown packages will be tolerated by this option, in fact it takes extra time to clarify that the ‘missing’ packages it refers to are those which failed to download. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844196 Title: --ignore-missing doesn't work on apt-get download To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/844196/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1052864] Re: Behavior of apt-get autoremove with arguments
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #548501 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548501 ** Also affects: apt (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548501 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052864 Title: Behavior of apt-get autoremove with arguments To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1052864/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 823961] Re: synaptic ignores preferences files in /etc/apt/preferences.d/
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 42178 synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823961 Title: synaptic ignores preferences files in /etc/apt/preferences.d/ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/823961/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
