[Bug 482103] Re: Submitted Bug Report Disappeared

2012-12-11 Thread Deryck Hodge
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 5977 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5977

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1089111
   closed bugs are not visible
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 5977
   Person's related bugs pages do not show closed / duplicate bug reports

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482103

Title:
  Submitted Bug Report Disappeared

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/482103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 834082] Re: Cannot target a bug to a series from an existing series task

2011-10-04 Thread Deryck Hodge
I've QA'ed this and things look fine in terms of everything working
correctly in the standard case and being ok to deploy.  I'm waiting to
hear from Kate about if the her playing on qastaging confirms the bug is
fixed for her.

** Tags removed: qa-needstesting
** Tags added: qa-ok

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834082

Title:
  Cannot target a bug to a series from an existing series task

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/834082/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 834082] Re: Cannot target a bug to a series from an existing series task

2011-10-03 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Branch linked: lp:~deryck/launchpad/target-series-bug-834082

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834082

Title:
  Cannot target a bug to a series from an existing series task

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/834082/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 836935] Re: upload rejected for files with a time stamp too far in the past

2011-08-31 Thread Deryck Hodge
FWIW, on the Launchpad side, we do indeed do the rejection on our side,
but we'll accept packages dated as far back as 1984.  This seems like
we're trying to match Debian since Colin notes the same check.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836935

Title:
  upload rejected for files with a time stamp too far in the past

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/836935/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 836935] Re: upload rejected for files with a time stamp too far in the past

2011-08-31 Thread Deryck Hodge
I'm closing the Launchpad task based on Colin's explanation here.
Thanks, Colin!

** Changed in: launchpad
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836935

Title:
  upload rejected for files with a time stamp too far in the past

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/836935/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 834082] Re: cannot target to series or update assigned to for oneiric-targeted ubuntu bugs

2011-08-31 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Changed in: launchpad
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Deryck Hodge (deryck)

** Changed in: launchpad
   Status: Triaged = In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834082

Title:
  cannot target to series or update assigned to for oneiric-targeted
  ubuntu bugs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/834082/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 834082] Re: Regression? can not target to series or update assigned to for ubuntu bugs

2011-08-25 Thread Deryck Hodge
I spent some time today trying to work out with Kate what's going on.
It seems that it's only from series URLs that she's having problems.
She can get work done by manually dropping the oneiric from the url
and using the distro or source package view of the bug.

I've added this to the Orange Squad kanban board for someone to pick up
as soon as is possible.

** Summary changed:

- Regression? can not target to series or update assigned to for ubuntu bugs
+ cannot target to series or update assigned to for oneiric-targeted ubuntu bugs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834082

Title:
  cannot target to series or update assigned to for oneiric-targeted
  ubuntu bugs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/834082/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 814577] Re: The following packages have unmet dependencies

2011-07-22 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Also affects: clamav (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: launchpad
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814577

Title:
  The following packages have unmet dependencies

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/814577/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 814577] Re: The following packages have unmet dependencies

2011-07-22 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Also affects: clamav (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: launchpad
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/814577

Title:
  The following packages have unmet dependencies

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/814577/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 813545] Re: Launchpad's package chooser at odds with the Launchpad bug reporter

2011-07-20 Thread Deryck Hodge
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 42298 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42298

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 42298
   package picker lists unpublished (invalid) packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/813545

Title:
  Launchpad's package chooser at odds with the Launchpad bug reporter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/813545/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 562706] Re: On i386, selecting the ubuntu studio packages fails to install

2011-07-19 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Changed in: launchpad
   Status: New = In Progress

** Changed in: launchpad
   Importance: Undecided = High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562706

Title:
  On i386, selecting the ubuntu studio packages fails to install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/562706/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 683159] Re: With touchpad browser tab sometimes closes when selected

2010-11-30 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Also affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Project changed: malone = null

-- 
With touchpad browser tab sometimes closes when selected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683159
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661278] Re: Cannot install linux-image-2.6.35-22-generic_2.6.35-22.34_amd64.deb

2010-10-15 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Also affects: ubuntu
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: malone
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Cannot install linux-image-2.6.35-22-generic_2.6.35-22.34_amd64.deb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661278
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Presence Service at https://launchpad.net/sugar-presence-service


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Presence Service but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Presence Service.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/sugar-presence-service/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.



Note: You may have already received this notification.  Please forgive the
additional email if that is the case.  We wanted to be sure we contacted all
the approproiate people for your project.  Also, the previous emails were sent
before the changes to your project settings.  You should double check to make
sure the settings are now what you want for automatic bug expiry.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
Ubuntu-sugarteam mailing list
Ubuntu-sugarteam@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-sugarteam


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Edgy Backports at https://launchpad.net/edgy-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Edgy Backports but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Edgy Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/edgy-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Breezy Backports at https://launchpad.net/breezy-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Breezy Backports but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Breezy Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/breezy-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Dapper Backports at https://launchpad.net/dapper-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Dapper Backports but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Dapper Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/dapper-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Feisty Backports at https://launchpad.net/feisty-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Feisty Backports but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Feisty Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/feisty-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Intrepid Ibex Backports at https://launchpad.net/intrepid-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Intrepid Ibex Backports but is 
inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Intrepid Ibex Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/intrepid-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Edgy Backports at https://launchpad.net/edgy-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Edgy Backports but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Edgy Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/edgy-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.



Note: You may have already received this notification.  Please forgive the
additional email if that is the case.  We wanted to be sure we contacted all
the approproiate people for your project.  Also, the previous emails were sent
before the changes to your project settings.  You should double check to make
sure the settings are now what you want for automatic bug expiry.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Hoary Backports at https://launchpad.net/ubp-hoary


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Hoary Backports but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Hoary Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubp-hoary/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.



Note: You may have already received this notification.  Please forgive the
additional email if that is the case.  We wanted to be sure we contacted all
the approproiate people for your project.  Also, the previous emails were sent
before the changes to your project settings.  You should double check to make
sure the settings are now what you want for automatic bug expiry.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
lucid-backports at https://launchpad.net/lucid-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for lucid-backports but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including lucid-backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.



Note: You may have already received this notification.  Please forgive the
additional email if that is the case.  We wanted to be sure we contacted all
the approproiate people for your project.  Also, the previous emails were sent
before the changes to your project settings.  You should double check to make
sure the settings are now what you want for automatic bug expiry.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Feisty Backports at https://launchpad.net/feisty-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Feisty Backports but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Feisty Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/feisty-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.



Note: You may have already received this notification.  Please forgive the
additional email if that is the case.  We wanted to be sure we contacted all
the approproiate people for your project.  Also, the previous emails were sent
before the changes to your project settings.  You should double check to make
sure the settings are now what you want for automatic bug expiry.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Breezy Backports at https://launchpad.net/breezy-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Breezy Backports but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Breezy Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/breezy-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.



Note: You may have already received this notification.  Please forgive the
additional email if that is the case.  We wanted to be sure we contacted all
the approproiate people for your project.  Also, the previous emails were sent
before the changes to your project settings.  You should double check to make
sure the settings are now what you want for automatic bug expiry.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Intrepid Ibex Backports at https://launchpad.net/intrepid-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Intrepid Ibex Backports but is 
inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Intrepid Ibex Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/intrepid-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.



Note: You may have already received this notification.  Please forgive the
additional email if that is the case.  We wanted to be sure we contacted all
the approproiate people for your project.  Also, the previous emails were sent
before the changes to your project settings.  You should double check to make
sure the settings are now what you want for automatic bug expiry.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Dapper Backports at https://launchpad.net/dapper-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Dapper Backports but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Dapper Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/dapper-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.



Note: You may have already received this notification.  Please forgive the
additional email if that is the case.  We wanted to be sure we contacted all
the approproiate people for your project.  Also, the previous emails were sent
before the changes to your project settings.  You should double check to make
sure the settings are now what you want for automatic bug expiry.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Jaunty Jackalope Backports at https://launchpad.net/jaunty-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Jaunty Jackalope Backports but 
is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Jaunty Jackalope Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/jaunty-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.



Note: You may have already received this notification.  Please forgive the
additional email if that is the case.  We wanted to be sure we contacted all
the approproiate people for your project.  Also, the previous emails were sent
before the changes to your project settings.  You should double check to make
sure the settings are now what you want for automatic bug expiry.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Hardy Backports at https://launchpad.net/hardy-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Hardy Backports but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Hardy Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/hardy-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.



Note: You may have already received this notification.  Please forgive the
additional email if that is the case.  We wanted to be sure we contacted all
the approproiate people for your project.  Also, the previous emails were sent
before the changes to your project settings.  You should double check to make
sure the settings are now what you want for automatic bug expiry.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Launchpad Bugs Re-enabling Auto Expiring Bugs

2010-10-05 Thread deryck . hodge

Bug expiry in Launchpad is changing


The way Launchpad handles inactive bugs is changing. This affects your project
Karmic Backports at https://launchpad.net/karmic-backports


What's going to change
---

Right now, the bug expiry option is enabled for Karmic Backports but is inactive
across all of Launchpad.

We weren't happy with the way bug expiry worked, so we turned it off. However,
now we're ready to switch it back on.

In about two weeks, we will re-enable automatic bug expiry in Launchpad.
However, we are going to deselect the bug expiry option on each project,
including Karmic Backports.


What this means for your project


If you want Launchpad to automatically expire bugs that appear to be inactive,
you need to select the 'Expire Incomplete bug reports when they become
inactive' option on this page:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/karmic-backports/+configure-bugtracker

For more detail on how Launchpad determines if a bug is inactive, visit our
help page:

https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Expiry

If you enable automatic bug expiry, Launchpad will start to automatically
apply the new 'Expired' status to inactive bugs from around 18 October 2010.

If you do not want Launchpad to automatically expire inactive bugs, you should
do nothing.

Why we're doing this
-

Most projects have some bugs that languish with no activity. They clutter bug
listings and, let's face it, are unlikely to ever come back to life.

Automatic bug expiry lets you hand Launchpad the burden of dealing with these.

We're disabling the feature on your project, and others, so that Launchpad
continues to work for you in the way it does now -- i.e. without automatic bug
expiry. If you do want to re-enable bug expiry, it'll take just a few seconds.



Note: You may have already received this notification.  Please forgive the
additional email if that is the case.  We wanted to be sure we contacted all
the approproiate people for your project.  Also, the previous emails were sent
before the changes to your project settings.  You should double check to make
sure the settings are now what you want for automatic bug expiry.


Deryck Hodge
Launchpad Bugs Team Lead

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 566255] Re: No network Bug 'Add Comment' error not helpful.

2010-09-15 Thread Deryck Hodge
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 521447 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521447

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 504112
   Incomplete error message when submitting comment fails
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 521447
   Uninformative error message
 * You can subscribe to bug 521447 by following this link: 
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/lazr-js/+bug/521447/+subscribe

-- 
No network Bug 'Add Comment' error not helpful.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566255
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 618579] Re: Register Ubuntu Forum

2010-08-16 Thread Deryck Hodge
This is not a problem with Launchpad, so I'm marking the Launchpad task
invalid.  I'm not sure where to file the bug against Ubuntu, though.

** Also affects: ubuntu
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: launchpad
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Register Ubuntu Forum
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618579
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 604684] Re: bug subscribe / unsubscribe option dosent work

2010-07-20 Thread Deryck Hodge
Can you give me some more info to help reproduce this?  How does it not
work?  Does this happen for every bug?  Screenshots might help, too, if
something is not firing off correctly in the UI.

Cheers,
deryck

** Changed in: malone
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
bug subscribe / unsubscribe option dosent work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604684
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 595124] Re: A bug's can_expire attribute is confusing

2010-07-09 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Changed in: malone
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Brian Murray (brian-murray)

** Changed in: malone
   Status: Triaged = Fix Committed

** Changed in: malone
Milestone: None = 10.08

-- 
A bug's can_expire attribute is confusing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595124
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: Fwd: Re: How to use the new Launchpad status?

2010-07-09 Thread Deryck Hodge
Hi, Martin.

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
 Hello Brian,

 Micah Gersten [2010-07-07 20:06 -0500]:
 Forwarding Brian Murray's response from the ubuntu-bugsquad list.
 As an example there might be a bug about Ubuntu bug reports not being
 fixed which will not stay in an Invalid status because that issue
 happens to be an important matter to a lot of people.  Subsequently,
 setting a bug like that to Opinion may be a useful thing to do.

 This seems like a prime example what Opinion should _not_ be. If a bug
 cannot be fixed, then no amount of but this sucks! exclamations will
 change this. So that bug should really be Invalid.

 A better approach to this would IMHO be to make it much harder to
 reopen bugs which are in a terminal state (fix released, wontfix,
 invalid).


Brian and I have been discussing this offline, and I wanted to jump in
here if that's okay. :-)

I agree that making bugs in a terminal state more fully closed or
locked down is a worthwhile goal.  We have plans to do some bits of
what people want in this regard, and in fact, at the same time as we
began discussing the Opinion status, we accepted a patch to make
Won't Fix ACLed so that only bug supervisors can un-set it.  If you
want to lock the status of a closed bug, you should be using Won't
Fix.

We aren't going to move ahead with other lock down techniques like
this until we finish reviewing the success of the Opinion status on
its own merits.  Meaning, we don't want to introduce too many changes
around closed bug statuses at once, so our stats about the usefulness
of Opinion are good.  The current plan is to review the effectiveness
of this status in 3 months.

I agree it's not entirely clear that Opinion is a closed bug status,
but it is.  It works just like Invalid.  It is only named differently,
and it is meant to convey the idea that:  this bug is closed but a
difference of opinion remains.  It's a social status, and should be
used as such.  I agree with Brian's assessment that it should be used
rarely or as a last resort.  It is for a particular social situation
only, i.e. bugs that won't remain closed because of that remaining
difference of opinion.

Now as to whether or not Ubuntu developers or the bug squad use the
status at all, that is, of course, entirely up to you all.  If you
don't find the status useful, that is another data point about its
effectiveness.  However, I hope someone will use it, so that we have
some data about how effective it is in the situation it's designed
for.


Cheers,
deryck

-- 
Deryck Hodge
https://launchpad.net/~deryck
http://www.devurandom.org/

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


[Bug 595124] Re: Launchpad's can_expire not being reset when comments added.

2010-06-24 Thread Deryck Hodge
I've had a look now.  can_expire is a wrapper around
findExpirableBugTasks, which only looks at date_last_updated and not
date_last_message.  We should extend the query in findExpirableBugTasks
to consider date_last_message.

While I think this is an easy bug to fix, I'm hesitant to tag it
trivial, as I have this theory that ultimately no malone bug is trivial.
But this is an easy one, definitely.

** Changed in: malone
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Tags added: dhrb easy

** Changed in: malone
   Status: New = Triaged

-- 
Launchpad's can_expire not being reset when comments added.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595124
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 595124] Re: Launchpad's can_expire not being reset when comments added.

2010-06-23 Thread Deryck Hodge
Setting this back to New to make sure I take a look today.

** Changed in: malone
   Status: Confirmed = New

-- 
Launchpad's can_expire not being reset when comments added.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595124
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 584962] Re: Bugs sidebar overlaps main content

2010-06-14 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Tags added: dhrb

** Description changed:

  launchpad The bug reporting and other tools website launchpad.net doesnt
  work well in resolution of 1024*768.the menus are getting
  overlapped.please correct it soon.
+ 
+ This could be considered when fixing Bug #593015.

-- 
Bugs sidebar overlaps main content
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584962
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 424849] Re: Launchpad should batch attachment notification emails

2010-06-06 Thread Deryck Hodge
Thanks for the detailed explanation, Graham.  That meshes with my
understanding of what we do, too.  That is a nice example of the
advantage to sending mail from the bug rather than the person, but I
think it should be a separate concern and we should consider this bug
fixed when we batch attachments from the same person.  That's an easy
fix and and easy win.

We should open a bug about batching comments themselves, assuming we can
find a nice way to do that.  I would have thought that bug existed, but
I cannot find one.  Otherwise, as Graham says, we do this genrally okay
now.  It's just not obvious to people because comments are common,
frequent, and can break batching of other changes in unexpected ways.

Cheers,
deryck

-- 
Launchpad should batch attachment notification emails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424849
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 424849] Re: Launchpad should batch attachment notification emails

2010-06-05 Thread Deryck Hodge
Don't we batch in 5 minute (or some such) intervals now?  Except for
comments and attachments, of course.

I thought that was the point of this bug, to enable batching for
attachments.

-- 
Launchpad should batch attachment notification emails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424849
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 584442] Re: launchpad crashses all the time when I try to submit a bug report

2010-05-25 Thread Deryck Hodge
We need more info to debug what's happening.  Is this a timeout or some
other error?  Can you comment and give us the OOPS number that you
received?  Also, the exact URL when you get the error is helpful, too.

Thanks.

** Changed in: malone
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
launchpad crashses all the time when I try to submit a bug report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584442
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 566255] Re: No network Bug 'Add Comment' error not helpful.

2010-04-26 Thread Deryck Hodge
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 504112 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504112

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 504112
   Incomplete error message when submitting comment fails

-- 
No network Bug 'Add Comment' error not helpful.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566255
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 564017] Re: thunderbird will not start

2010-04-15 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Also affects: mozilla-thunderbird (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: malone
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
thunderbird will not start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564017
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 538097] Re: +storeblob fails with 500 Internal server error on production (works on edge)

2010-03-15 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Changed in: malone
   Status: Confirmed = Triaged

** Changed in: malone
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: malone
Milestone: None = 10.03

** Tags added: oops

-- 
+storeblob fails with 500 Internal server error on production (works on edge)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538097
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 532143] Re: apport's ubuntu-bug xserver-xorg-input-wacom creates a bug for nvidia-graphics-drivers

2010-03-11 Thread Deryck Hodge
I don't think there's anything for us to do about this on the Launchpad
Bugs end of things.  If I'm misunderstanding the problem, though, please
reopen and help me understand.

Cheers,
deryck

** Changed in: malone
   Status: New = Won't Fix

-- 
apport's ubuntu-bug xserver-xorg-input-wacom creates a bug for 
nvidia-graphics-drivers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532143
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 357358] Re: Apport should make clear to non-technical users what happens when submitting or subscribing to a bug report

2009-11-19 Thread Deryck Hodge
The report a bug page language has been deliberately crafted, and I
don't think the suggestions here are changes we would make.

I think subscribing when you a file a bug is reasonable, though I did
filed Bug #485627 about not subscribing people automatically when a bug
is marked a dupe.  Bug #484291 has some ideas about making sure people
are informed about their reply to mails.  Also, we recently fixed Bug
#48863 to always add an unsubscribe link to emails for direct
subscribers.

So given that we likely wouldn't do any of point #1's suggestions, and
given that all of #2's suggestions are covered by other bugs, I'm
closing this as invalid for malone.  If there are other concrete ideas
here that are missed, feel free to open new bugs about those specific
issues.

** Changed in: malone
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Apport should make clear to non-technical users what happens when submitting or 
subscribing to a bug report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 457186] Re: Incomplete Status should not be assigned until attempt to complete is made.

2009-10-21 Thread Deryck Hodge
I don't see a bug here.  It's a suggestion for how to use the incomplete
status, and every project using Launchpad will have different ideas of
how to use a given status.

** Changed in: malone
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
Incomplete Status should not be assigned until attempt to complete is made.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457186
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 436417] Re: acerhdf: unknown (unsupported) BIOS version Acer /Aspire 7720Z /V1.45

2009-09-25 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Also affects: ubuntu
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Project changed: malone = null

-- 
acerhdf: unknown (unsupported) BIOS version Acer  /Aspire 7720Z/V1.45
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/436417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 402821] Re: Alt-Tab of a minimized window only shows icon

2009-09-03 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Project changed: dead-ayatana = hundredpapercuts

-- 
Alt-Tab of a minimized window only shows icon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402821
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 29560] Re: drag drop improvement: delay bringing window to front until mouse released

2009-09-03 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Project changed: dead-ayatana = hundredpapercuts

-- 
drag  drop improvement: delay bringing window to front until mouse released
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/29560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 388633] Re: ComboBox has a big blank area above the position of its control

2009-09-03 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Project changed: dead-ayatana = hundredpapercuts

-- 
ComboBox has a big blank area above the position of its control
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388633
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 388593] Re: Wifi auto-connection asks for keyring password

2009-09-03 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Project changed: dead-ayatana = hundredpapercuts

-- 
Wifi auto-connection asks for keyring password
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388593
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 387573] Re: Drop-down calendar does not close unless you click on it

2009-09-03 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Project changed: dead-ayatana = hundredpapercuts

-- 
Drop-down calendar does not close unless you click on it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387573
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 124315] Re: remember window position of applications

2009-09-03 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Project changed: dead-ayatana = hundredpapercuts

-- 
remember window position of applications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124315
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 421414] Re: Algoscore [needs packaging]

2009-09-01 Thread Deryck Hodge
** Also affects: ubuntu
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Project changed: malone = null

** Tags added: needs-packaging

-- 
Algoscore [needs packaging]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421414
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs