[Bug 1732803] Re: systemd-journald RateLimitBurst is sometimes divided by 4
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1732803 Title: systemd-journald RateLimitBurst is sometimes divided by 4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1732803/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1639776] Re: dnsmasq fails to send queries out after suspend disconnects the interface
I've installed this package on Xenial, and it fixes this issue for me (specifically, with openvpn). ** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1639776 Title: dnsmasq fails to send queries out after suspend disconnects the interface To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1639776/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1547231] Re: /proc/$pid/maps performance regression
What makes this unsuitable for an SRU? Is the concern that this would be considered an interface change? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547231 Title: /proc/$pid/maps performance regression To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1547231/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1547231] Re: /proc/$pid/maps performance regression
** Description changed: /proc/$pid/maps experienced a significant performance regression for processes with large numbers of threads between Precise and Trusty due to an upstream bug. This behavior is currently blocking my ability to upgrade to Trusty, as we depend on applications with with 10s of thousands of threads. - The issue has been fixed in the usptream -mm tree. + The issue has been fixed in the 4.5 release. Upstream report: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/144712 - Upstream patches: - https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git/commit/?h=since-4.4=2d2a106c79f4b5b2b10e72957f7448e276dbf0a9 - https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git/commit/?h=since-4.4=eb1899e03405faf7c79396ae9593303d53e2710d + Upstream patches: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=65376df582174ffcec9e6471bf5b0dd79ba05e4a ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: linux-image-3.13.0-36-generic 3.13.0-36.63 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-36.63-generic 3.13.11.6 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-36-generic x86_64 AlsaDevices: - total 0 - crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 1 Feb 18 12:13 seq - crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Feb 18 12:13 timer + total 0 + crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 1 Feb 18 12:13 seq + crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Feb 18 12:13 timer AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay' ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord' AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: Date: Thu Feb 18 13:44:23 2016 MachineType: Supermicro A1SAi PciMultimedia: - + ProcEnviron: - TERM=screen - PATH=(custom, no user) - XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + TERM=screen + PATH=(custom, no user) + XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash ProcFB: 0 astdrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: root=/dev/md1 ro console=tty0 console=ttyS0,57600 RelatedPackageVersions: - linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-36-generic N/A - linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-36-generic N/A - linux-firmware 1.127.20 + linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-36-generic N/A + linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-36-generic N/A + linux-firmware 1.127.20 RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'rfkill' SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-07-18 (579 days ago) WifiSyslog: - + dmi.bios.date: 02/27/2014 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 1.0c dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M. dmi.board.name: A1SAi dmi.board.vendor: Supermicro dmi.board.version: 123456789 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.type: 18 dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1.0c:bd02/27/2014:svnSupermicro:pnA1SAi:pvr123456789:rvnSupermicro:rnA1SAi:rvr123456789:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct18:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.: dmi.product.name: A1SAi dmi.product.version: 123456789 dmi.sys.vendor: Supermicro -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547231 Title: /proc/$pid/maps performance regression To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1547231/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1547231] Re: /proc/$pid/maps performance regression
Hey folks - Anything I can do to get this into the next trusty kernel release? This has now caused multiple production incidents for us. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547231 Title: /proc/$pid/maps performance regression To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1547231/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551897] Re: Excessive CPU utilization
Thanks Martin. I've confirmed that the package solves the issue for me. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551897 Title: Excessive CPU utilization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551897] Re: Excessive CPU utilization
Sorry about that, Martin. Not sure what happened. Just re-uploaded without the noise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551897 Title: Excessive CPU utilization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551897] Re: Excessive CPU utilization
** Changed in: ccid (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551897 Title: Excessive CPU utilization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551897] Re: Excessive CPU utilization
** Description changed: + + [DESCRIPTION] + + When hotplugging a composite USB device that expose multiple interfaces + (such as a Yubikey NEO or Yubikey 4), libccid does not correctly de- + initialize the USB library when it skips over the non-CCID interface. + + This subsequently results in pcscd (or, presumably, anything that loads + libccid, though I don't think anything else does) either using 100% CPU + or segfaulting when the device is unplugged. + + This seems worthy of an SRU as it is an easily reproducible bug with a + simple, targeted fix. + + [TEST CASE] + + 1. Make sure pcscd is running (sudo systemctl start pcscd; possibly sudo systemctl restart pcscd if a potentially fixed package has just been installed) + 2. Plug and then unplug a composite USB device that includes a CCID interface (such as a Yubikey NEO) + 3. Observe that pcscd has crashed with a segfault (sudo systemctl status pcscd) + + [REGRESSION POTENTIAL] + + The patch is quite narrow, and thus the potential for regression should + be limited. The new code adds calls to close_libusb_if_needed, which is + already written to be fairly conservative. + + The worst case here is likely an unexpected call to libusb_exit, which + could cause libusb to get into an inconsistent state. However, in + practice the call seems quite safe, and the likelihood of regression + low. + + + == + Original bug description: + In xenial, pcscd CPU utilization occasionally goes haywire: - PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND - 27404 root 20 0 384264 4992 2228 S 100.3 0.0 75:39.03 /usr/sbin/pcscd --foreground --auto-exit + PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND + 27404 root 20 0 384264 4992 2228 S 100.3 0.0 75:39.03 /usr/sbin/pcscd --foreground --auto-exit I get this about once a day since installing xenial. I can't quite connect it to any specific event on the system, it just seems to happen sporadically -- fan turns on, I run top, and there it is again. Never had this issue on same hardware incl. smartcard with trusty. I wonder if it might be this? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718473 ** Description changed: - - [DESCRIPTION] + [Impact] When hotplugging a composite USB device that expose multiple interfaces (such as a Yubikey NEO or Yubikey 4), libccid does not correctly de- initialize the USB library when it skips over the non-CCID interface. This subsequently results in pcscd (or, presumably, anything that loads libccid, though I don't think anything else does) either using 100% CPU or segfaulting when the device is unplugged. This seems worthy of an SRU as it is an easily reproducible bug with a simple, targeted fix. - [TEST CASE] + [Test Case] 1. Make sure pcscd is running (sudo systemctl start pcscd; possibly sudo systemctl restart pcscd if a potentially fixed package has just been installed) 2. Plug and then unplug a composite USB device that includes a CCID interface (such as a Yubikey NEO) 3. Observe that pcscd has crashed with a segfault (sudo systemctl status pcscd) - [REGRESSION POTENTIAL] + [Regression Potential] The patch is quite narrow, and thus the potential for regression should be limited. The new code adds calls to close_libusb_if_needed, which is already written to be fairly conservative. The worst case here is likely an unexpected call to libusb_exit, which could cause libusb to get into an inconsistent state. However, in practice the call seems quite safe, and the likelihood of regression low. - == Original bug description: In xenial, pcscd CPU utilization occasionally goes haywire: PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 27404 root 20 0 384264 4992 2228 S 100.3 0.0 75:39.03 /usr/sbin/pcscd --foreground --auto-exit I get this about once a day since installing xenial. I can't quite connect it to any specific event on the system, it just seems to happen sporadically -- fan turns on, I run top, and there it is again. Never had this issue on same hardware incl. smartcard with trusty. I wonder if it might be this? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718473 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551897 Title: Excessive CPU utilization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
[Bug 1551897] Re: Excessive CPU utilization
This is actually a bug in ccid's handling of composite USB devices, and has been fixed upstream (https://alioth.debian.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi- bin/gitweb.cgi?p=pcsclite/CCID.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=3c21f452543983f3625a1965ce234074cbda6865). My experience was that this bug caused pcscd to segfault, rather than to consume 100% CPU, but the fix appears to be the same either way. I've attached a debdiff that fixes the issue for me, and I've uploaded a test build to my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/ubuntu /ubuntu-tests). I suspect this merits an SRU, since it's a significant regression in functionality without a good workaround; I'll start on the paperwork. ** Patch added: "ccid_1.4.22-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+attachment/4659458/+files/ccid_1.4.22-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551897 Title: Excessive CPU utilization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551897] Re: Excessive CPU utilization
** Also affects: ccid (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ccid (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ccid (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ccid (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: pcsc-lite (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551897 Title: Excessive CPU utilization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ccid/+bug/1551897/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1297849] Re: [SRU] Virtual private network connection fails after distribution upgrade due to outdated Network Manager configuration files
@brian-murray: I just installed the package from proposed on trusty and it seems to have improved things, although there's a 5-10 second delay after nm-applet starts up where it hasn't registered itself as a secrets provider. Still, this seems to be an improvement in behavior. ** Tags added: verification-done-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297849 Title: [SRU] Virtual private network connection fails after distribution upgrade due to outdated Network Manager configuration files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/network-manager-applet/+bug/1297849/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1499075] Re: python3.4.3 SRU breaks awscli
** Changed in: python3.4 (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Patch added: "python-botocore_0.29.0+repack-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-botocore/+bug/1499075/+attachment/4472704/+files/python-botocore_0.29.0%2Brepack-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1499075 Title: python3.4.3 SRU breaks awscli To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-botocore/+bug/1499075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1499075] Re: python3.4.3 SRU breaks awscli
** Also affects: python-botocore (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: python3.4 (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: python-botocore (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: python-botocore (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1499075 Title: python3.4.3 SRU breaks awscli To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-botocore/+bug/1499075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1311886] Re: nsd fails to install
I've attached fixes for the issue for Trusty and Utopic, the only two affected releases. They're also building now in my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~broder/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntu-tests). I'll upload to -proposed once I can confirm the test packages work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311886 Title: nsd fails to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1311886] Re: nsd fails to install
** Patch added: nsd_4.0.3-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+attachment/4295873/+files/nsd_4.0.3-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311886 Title: nsd fails to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1311886] Re: nsd fails to install
** Description changed: + [IMPACT] + + Currently, nsd fails to install. The postinst attempts to start the nsd + daemon before creating the nsd user, and fails when starting the daemon + fails. + + The daemon is started by debhelper-generated snippets. The attached + fixes move the auto-generated snippets to the end of the postinst, after + the non-auto-generated code creates the user. + + (This is the fix used by Debian to fix Debian bug #743396) + + [TEST CASE] + + 1. Ensure that the nsd user doesn't already exist: + +$ getent passwd nsd +$ + + 2. Install nsd: + +$ sudo apt-get install nsd + + Note: This won't work in an environment such as a buildd chroot where + daemons are disabled via policy-rc.d - you'll either have to remove the + file or specifically whitelist the nsd daemon. + + Expected results: package install successfully + + Actual results: + + $ sudo apt-get install nsd + + Unpacking nsd (4.0.1-1) ... + Processing triggers for man-db (2.6.7.1-1) ... + Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ... + Setting up nsd (4.0.1-1) ... + start: Job failed to start + invoke-rc.d: initscript nsd, action start failed. + dpkg: error processing package nsd (--configure): + subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 + Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ... + Errors were encountered while processing: + nsd + E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) + + [REGRESSION POTENTIAL] + + Seems quite low. There are no changes to the actual nsd code, so the + likelihood of affecting successful installs seems minimal. The only + debhelper-generated code in the postinst are related to the init script + (starting the daemon, and upgrading from sysvinit to upstart), so the + possibility for side-effects from moving the snippets also seems + minimal. + + === + Original description: + installing nsd fails unless the `nsd` user is created first. On a completely fresh Ubuntu 14.04 machine (from AWS's AMI): $ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get install nsd Unpacking nsd (4.0.1-1) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.6.7.1-1) ... Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ... Setting up nsd (4.0.1-1) ... start: Job failed to start invoke-rc.d: initscript nsd, action start failed. dpkg: error processing package nsd (--configure): - subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 + subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ... Errors were encountered while processing: - nsd + nsd E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) $ sudo useradd nsd $ sudo dpkg --configure nsd Setting up nsd (4.0.1-1) ... nsd start/running, process 1887 ** Patch added: nsd_4.0.1-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+attachment/4295872/+files/nsd_4.0.1-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311886 Title: nsd fails to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1311886] Re: nsd fails to install
** Also affects: nsd (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nsd (Ubuntu Utopic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nsd (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: nsd (Ubuntu Utopic) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: nsd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311886 Title: nsd fails to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1311886] Re: nsd fails to install
** Changed in: nsd (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: nsd (Ubuntu Utopic) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311886 Title: nsd fails to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nsd/+bug/1311886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1234376] Re: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files
Thanks for the approvals, Sebastian and Brian. I've repeated the steps I outlined in the description and confirmed that the bug does not occur with the packages in -proposed. I've also installed the packages in our production nagios server and confirmed that things seem to more or less work as expected. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234376 Title: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1234376] Re: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files
Thanks for the approvals, Sebastian and Brian. I've repeated the steps I outlined in the description and confirmed that the bug does not occur with the packages in -proposed. I've also installed the packages in our production nagios server and confirmed that things seem to more or less work as expected. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234376 Title: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1234376] Re: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files
** Also affects: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234376 Title: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1234376] Re: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files
** Description changed: - Description: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS - Release: 12.04 + [Impact] + Under nagios 3.2.3 with state retention enabled, any host aliases or display names assigned to a host would be persisted into the retention file, and would supersede subsequent configuration changes. As a result, changes to either hosts' aliases or display names would not be reflected in either the nagios CGI interface or notification macros (like HOSTALIAS) - nagios3: - Installed: 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 - Candidate: 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 + There are numerous references to this bug online, including several upstream nagios issues: + http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=238 + http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=272 - The problem is described here http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=238 + And several blog posts: + http://ten-fingers-and-a-brain.com/2011/10/nagios-doesnt-update-the-host-alias-macro-%E2%80%93-workaround/ + http://www.claudiokuenzler.com/blog/179/nagios-notifications-contain-wrong-host-alias-name#.VIZph-pGjUY - The solution that worked for me is here - http://www.claudiokuenzler.com/blog/179/nagios-notifications-contain- - wrong-host-alias-name but instead of fully deleting - /var/lib/nagios3/retention.dat I stopped the nagios service update the - alias and restarted it. + [Test Case] + Although the bug is in nagios3-core, it's easiest to observe using nagios3-cgi: + + 1. Install nagios3-cgi + 2. Edit /etc/nagios3/cgi.cfg and set use_authentication=0 + 3. Edit /etc/apache2/conf.d/nagios3.conf and remove the AuthName, AuthType, AuthUserFile, and require lines + 4. Restart apache2 to pick up the new config + 5. Open http://localhost/cgi-bin/nagios3/extinfo.cgi?type=1host=localhost + 6. Observe that the host is described as Host localhost (localhost) - localhost is both the host name and the alias + 7. Edit /etc/nagios3/conf.d/localhost_nagios2.cfg and change alias to otherhost (line 10 or so) + 8. Restart nagios3 to pick up the new config + 9. Open http://localhost/cgi-bin/nagios3/extinfo.cgi?type=1host=localhost again + + Buggy behavior: host is still described as Host localhost (localhost) + Fixed behavior: host description is updated to Host otherhost (localhost) to reflect alias change + + [Regression Potential] + It's difficult to understand what the upstream intent was when this bug was introduced to know if it's addressing a broader issue - both the introduction and resolution of the issue lack useful commentary in the commit messages. + + However, this patch is definitely a behavior change: previously changes + to the disk configuration would not be reflected in the nagios runtime + configuration without manual intervention. It's possible there are use + cases which rely on this behavior. However, it seems unlikely to me that + a user would change a configuration file and restart the daemon and not + intend for those changes to take effect + + This issue has proven to be frustrating to our usage of nagios in + production, and my belief is that fixing it would create less net + confusion than leaving it. However, maybe that's not enough to satisfy + the SRU bar. + + Outside of that change, the patch is very narrow and regression + potential seems low. ** Patch added: nagios3_3.2.3-3ubuntu1.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+attachment/4276679/+files/nagios3_3.2.3-3ubuntu1.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234376 Title: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1234376] Re: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files
** Also affects: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: nagios3 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234376 Title: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1234376] Re: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files
** Description changed: - Description: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS - Release: 12.04 + [Impact] + Under nagios 3.2.3 with state retention enabled, any host aliases or display names assigned to a host would be persisted into the retention file, and would supersede subsequent configuration changes. As a result, changes to either hosts' aliases or display names would not be reflected in either the nagios CGI interface or notification macros (like HOSTALIAS) - nagios3: - Installed: 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 - Candidate: 3.2.3-3ubuntu1 + There are numerous references to this bug online, including several upstream nagios issues: + http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=238 + http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=272 - The problem is described here http://tracker.nagios.org/view.php?id=238 + And several blog posts: + http://ten-fingers-and-a-brain.com/2011/10/nagios-doesnt-update-the-host-alias-macro-%E2%80%93-workaround/ + http://www.claudiokuenzler.com/blog/179/nagios-notifications-contain-wrong-host-alias-name#.VIZph-pGjUY - The solution that worked for me is here - http://www.claudiokuenzler.com/blog/179/nagios-notifications-contain- - wrong-host-alias-name but instead of fully deleting - /var/lib/nagios3/retention.dat I stopped the nagios service update the - alias and restarted it. + [Test Case] + Although the bug is in nagios3-core, it's easiest to observe using nagios3-cgi: + + 1. Install nagios3-cgi + 2. Edit /etc/nagios3/cgi.cfg and set use_authentication=0 + 3. Edit /etc/apache2/conf.d/nagios3.conf and remove the AuthName, AuthType, AuthUserFile, and require lines + 4. Restart apache2 to pick up the new config + 5. Open http://localhost/cgi-bin/nagios3/extinfo.cgi?type=1host=localhost + 6. Observe that the host is described as Host localhost (localhost) - localhost is both the host name and the alias + 7. Edit /etc/nagios3/conf.d/localhost_nagios2.cfg and change alias to otherhost (line 10 or so) + 8. Restart nagios3 to pick up the new config + 9. Open http://localhost/cgi-bin/nagios3/extinfo.cgi?type=1host=localhost again + + Buggy behavior: host is still described as Host localhost (localhost) + Fixed behavior: host description is updated to Host otherhost (localhost) to reflect alias change + + [Regression Potential] + It's difficult to understand what the upstream intent was when this bug was introduced to know if it's addressing a broader issue - both the introduction and resolution of the issue lack useful commentary in the commit messages. + + However, this patch is definitely a behavior change: previously changes + to the disk configuration would not be reflected in the nagios runtime + configuration without manual intervention. It's possible there are use + cases which rely on this behavior. However, it seems unlikely to me that + a user would change a configuration file and restart the daemon and not + intend for those changes to take effect + + This issue has proven to be frustrating to our usage of nagios in + production, and my belief is that fixing it would create less net + confusion than leaving it. However, maybe that's not enough to satisfy + the SRU bar. + + Outside of that change, the patch is very narrow and regression + potential seems low. ** Patch added: nagios3_3.2.3-3ubuntu1.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+attachment/4276679/+files/nagios3_3.2.3-3ubuntu1.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234376 Title: HOSTALIAS doesn't update after changing config files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nagios3/+bug/1234376/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191460] Re: $PreserveFQDN and $LocalHostName not always used
There's a comment at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu- branches/ubuntu/saucy/rsyslog/saucy/view/head:/tools/syslogd.c#L2428 that says we need to re-call GenerateLocalHostNameProperty after parsing config, but as far as I can tell, that doesn't happen. Does adding a call to queryLocalHostname() around line 2958 of tools/syslogd.c make this work? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191460 Title: $PreserveFQDN and $LocalHostName not always used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1191460/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1106429] Re: [backportpackage] -sa detection does not work with private PPAs
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106429 Title: [backportpackage] -sa detection does not work with private PPAs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1106429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
I did look at those - the patch for CVE-2009-5031 seems to have been applied already. The link to the patch for CVE-2012-2751 (http://mod- security.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mod- security?view=revisionsortby=logsortdir=downrevision=1918) appears to be dead, so I haven't been able to tell whether that patch has been applied or not. ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2009-5031 ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2751 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
Ok, here's a patch with the fix for CVE-2012-2751 rolled in. I kind of made up the DEP-3 fields, but I think they'll at least satisfy their purpose. I've tested that the resulting packages with this patch work at at least a basic level, but I still don't have POCs to test with or anything. ** Patch added: libapache-mod-security_2.5.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modsecurity-apache/+bug/1169030/+attachment/3645690/+files/libapache-mod-security_2.5.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
Bleh, looks to have been a stupid copy/paste error (missing / for the start of a /* comment). Builds for me now, and still seems to install/work at a basic level. ** Patch added: libapache-mod-security_2.5.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modsecurity-apache/+bug/1169030/+attachment/3645778/+files/libapache-mod-security_2.5.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
And that, of course, is based off of completely the wrong version. I'm not even sure where I got that from. Here's a patch that's actually for the Lucid packaging. (Testing still forthcoming) ** Also affects: libapache-mod-security (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: libapache-mod-security_2.5.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+attachment/3644987/+files/libapache-mod-security_2.5.11-1ubuntu0.1.debdiff ** Changed in: libapache-mod-security (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: modsecurity-apache (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Triaged ** Changed in: modsecurity-apache (Ubuntu) Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: libapache-mod-security (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
Ok, I've installed this on one of my Lucid servers, and it still seems to work at at least a basic level. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
By the way, feel free to ping me (broder) in #ubuntu-hardened if I can do anything to improve the debdiff. ** Changed in: libapache-mod-security (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Triaged ** Changed in: libapache-mod-security (Ubuntu) Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-security/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] [NEW] CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: http://marc.info/?l=oss-securitym=136499182131283w=2 http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2013/CVE-2013-1915.html ** Affects: modsecurity-apache (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modsecurity-apache/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169030] Re: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack
Here's a patch which I believe be a correct backport of the upstream patch to Lucid (it didn't apply cleanly due to other additions to modsecurity since Lucid's release). I've verified that it builds but not yet done any testing - I'll be doing so shortly. ** Patch added: modsecurity-apache_2.6.6-5ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modsecurity-apache/+bug/1169030/+attachment/3644365/+files/modsecurity-apache_2.6.6-5ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169030 Title: CVE 2013-1915: local files disclosure or resource exhaustion via XML External Entity attack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modsecurity-apache/+bug/1169030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1106429] [NEW] [backportpackage] -sa detection does not worth with private PPAs
Public bug reported: backportpackage's attempt to detect whether -sa is needed or not is foiled by private PPAs, as hitting https://launchpad.net/~whomever/+archive/whatever/+files/my_file redirects to the login page. httplib2 follows redirects, and the login page returns a 200, so backportpackage concludes it doesn't need to pass -sa. Not totally sure what the right fix here is. My recollection was that determining this from using the LP API was difficult, but I haven't looked at the options in a while. ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106429 Title: [backportpackage] -sa detection does not worth with private PPAs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1106429/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1007042] Re: [backportpackage] fails but worked last week
We used to generate backport version numbers of the form VERSION_BEING_BACKPORTED~RELEASE_CODENAME1. It worked well at the time because it guaranteed that a backport of the same version to, e.g., natty would have a lower version number than the backport to oneiric, since the n would sort before o. That's important because we rely on the version numbers sorting like that for release upgrade paths with backports to work. Colin pointed out that this would break down when we ran out of letters and started wrapping around, and suggested that we instead switch to using the version number, which is what backportpackage now does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007042 Title: [backportpackage] fails but worked last week To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1007042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1007042] Re: [backportpackage] fails but worked last week
We used to generate backport version numbers of the form VERSION_BEING_BACKPORTED~RELEASE_CODENAME1. It worked well at the time because it guaranteed that a backport of the same version to, e.g., natty would have a lower version number than the backport to oneiric, since the n would sort before o. That's important because we rely on the version numbers sorting like that for release upgrade paths with backports to work. Colin pointed out that this would break down when we ran out of letters and started wrapping around, and suggested that we instead switch to using the version number, which is what backportpackage now does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007042 Title: [backportpackage] fails but worked last week To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1007042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Backports procedures updates
Hey guys - Some quick updates based on assorted recent discussions. As we move to a world where archive admins use APIs instead of shell access to do their job, it's no longer really necessary for them to be processing backports. Colin has said that he is OK with us uploading backports ourselves using backportpackage from ubuntu-dev-tools, and you've probably noticed Iain and me doing this. For reference, here's the invocation I would use if I was processing bug #1005372 backportpackage -ke...@ebroder.net -d precise -s quantal -b -u ubuntu -w ~/ubuntu/conky -c 1005372 conky (Note that for multi-destination backports, you can specify -d multiple times) These uploads will still land in UNAPPROVED and require AA review, but hopefully it should be significantly easier for everyone. I've made a few tweaks to backportpackage at Colin's request. It now passes -v to debuild with the last published version number, which matches archive admin-generated backports. It has a -c, --close flag to mention an LP bug in the changelog, though the bug still has to be closed by hand (since our bugs aren't part of the ubuntu project, and backports uploads can't close bugs anyway). And I've changed the version number style from ~precise1 to ~ubuntu12.04.1, which will make our version numbers more future-proof when we run out of letters. I don't think any of these changes have been included in a ubuntu-dev-tools release yet. I've been using the u-d-t daily builds (https://launchpad.net/~udt-developers/+archive/daily). I'm planning to send an email to ubuntu-devel soon with some updates on the backports project (including docs updates and assorted flow changes), though I won't be offended if someone beats me to the punch. - Evan -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Testing for backports of security/stable updates
As part of trying to do a slightly better job of handling security and stable updates, I'd like to propose reducing our testing requirements for those backports. Proposal: For stable and security updates of backported packages which are not new upstream versions, it is not necessary to test reverse dependencies. The only testing required is builds/installs/runs of the package itself. Objections to making this official backports policy? - Evan -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 994424] Re: Please backport gnome-do 0.9-1 (universe) from quantal
This has been uploaded and accepted. It will now build, and should be available in the archive shortly. Thanks! ** Changed in: precise-backports Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Precise Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994424 Title: Please backport gnome-do 0.9-1 (universe) from quantal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/994424/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 954798] Re: Please backport tickr 0.6.0-2
This has now been uploaded and accepted. It should build and become available in the repositories over the next few hours. Thanks again! ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Status: In Progress = Fix Released ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: In Progress = Fix Released ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954798 Title: Please backport tickr 0.6.0-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/954798/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 607896] Re: Please sync Griffith 0.12-1 from Debian (unstable) to Maverick - updated dependency
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607896 Title: Please sync Griffith 0.12-1 from Debian (unstable) to Maverick - updated dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/griffith/+bug/607896/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382591] Re: Backport Gwyddion 2.24-1 to hardy, lucid, maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382591 Title: Backport Gwyddion 2.24-1 to hardy, lucid, maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hardy-backports/+bug/382591/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353126] Re: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126 Title: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/353126/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 804034] Re: Please provide 0.9.6 package for Maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804034 Title: Please provide 0.9.6 package for Maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/804034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 682460] Re: please backport virtualbox-ose 3.2.10 from natty to maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682460 Title: please backport virtualbox-ose 3.2.10 from natty to maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/682460/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382591] Re: Backport Gwyddion 2.24-1 to hardy, lucid, maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382591 Title: Backport Gwyddion 2.24-1 to hardy, lucid, maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hardy-backports/+bug/382591/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 899655] Re: please backport drush 4.5-4 from precise
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. It looks like you requested a backport to Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx). Now that Ubuntu 10.10 is no longer supported, it may be possible to backport this package directly to Ubuntu 10.04, without requiring backports to intervening releases. I'm going to assume you are primarily interested in the Ubuntu 10.04 backport, and mark the newer bug tasks as Incomplete. If this is incorrect, please feel free to adjust the status yourself, or comment and I will do so. This bug is being manipulated by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899655 Title: please backport drush 4.5-4 from precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/899655/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 662064] Re: Please backport subdownloader 2.0.14 to Maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662064 Title: Please backport subdownloader 2.0.14 to Maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/662064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 661218] Re: Please backport vim 7.3
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661218 Title: Please backport vim 7.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/661218/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 653619] Re: Please back port Evolution 2.32 to lucid LTS and maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653619 Title: Please back port Evolution 2.32 to lucid LTS and maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/653619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 353126] Re: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353126 Title: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/353126/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 954798] Re: Please backport tickr 0.6.0-2
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. It looks like you requested a backport to Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx). Now that Ubuntu 10.10 is no longer supported, it may be possible to backport this package directly to Ubuntu 10.04, without requiring backports to intervening releases. I'm going to assume you are primarily interested in the Ubuntu 10.04 backport, and mark the newer bug tasks as Incomplete. If this is incorrect, please feel free to adjust the status yourself, or comment and I will do so. This bug is being manipulated by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954798 Title: Please backport tickr 0.6.0-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/954798/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 834361] Re: Please backport tahoe-lafs (1.8.3-0ubuntu1) from oneiric
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. It looks like you requested a backport to Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx). Now that Ubuntu 10.10 is no longer supported, it may be possible to backport this package directly to Ubuntu 10.04, without requiring backports to intervening releases. I'm going to assume you are primarily interested in the Ubuntu 10.04 backport, and mark the newer bug tasks as Incomplete. If this is incorrect, please feel free to adjust the status yourself, or comment and I will do so. This bug is being manipulated by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834361 Title: Please backport tahoe-lafs (1.8.3-0ubuntu1) from oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/834361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 816838] Re: Please, backport zabbix 1.8.5 from Oneiric
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. It looks like you requested a backport to Ubuntu 10.04 (Lucid Lynx). Now that Ubuntu 10.10 is no longer supported, it may be possible to backport this package directly to Ubuntu 10.04, without requiring backports to intervening releases. I'm going to assume you are primarily interested in the Ubuntu 10.04 backport, and mark the newer bug tasks as Incomplete. If this is incorrect, please feel free to adjust the status yourself, or comment and I will do so. This bug is being manipulated by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816838 Title: Please, backport zabbix 1.8.5 from Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/816838/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 828532] Re: Request Samba 3.6.0 backport for 10.10
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828532 Title: Request Samba 3.6.0 backport for 10.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/828532/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 806937] Re: Please backport q4wine v0.120 from natty (or 121 from Oneiric)
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806937 Title: Please backport q4wine v0.120 from natty (or 121 from Oneiric) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/806937/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 797961] Re: Please Backport Open vSwitch to maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797961 Title: Please Backport Open vSwitch to maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/797961/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 804034] Re: Please provide 0.9.6 package for Maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804034 Title: Please provide 0.9.6 package for Maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/804034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 725357] Re: A backport of fetchyahoo is needed because old maverick/natty version (2.12.4-1) is not usable anymore due to recent Yahoo service changes.
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725357 Title: A backport of fetchyahoo is needed because old maverick/natty version (2.12.4-1) is not usable anymore due to recent Yahoo service changes. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mail-notification/+bug/725357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 708570] Re: Please backport python-smbc 1.0.10 to Lucid, Maverick, and Natty
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708570 Title: Please backport python-smbc 1.0.10 to Lucid, Maverick, and Natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/708570/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 689217] Re: Please backport mpich2/1.3.1-1 from natty
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689217 Title: Please backport mpich2/1.3.1-1 from natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/689217/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 741751] Re: Backport nagios3 (3.2.3-1ubuntu1) from natty
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741751 Title: Backport nagios3 (3.2.3-1ubuntu1) from natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/741751/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 685141] Re: Transmission takes too long to verify large downloaded files
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685141 Title: Transmission takes too long to verify large downloaded files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/685141/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 686766] Re: Please backport live-build 2.0.12-2 from natty to maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686766 Title: Please backport live-build 2.0.12-2 from natty to maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/686766/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 779881] Re: Please backport libdist-zilla-perl 4.200000-1 from natty to lucid, maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779881 Title: Please backport libdist-zilla-perl 4.20-1 from natty to lucid, maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/779881/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 697154] Re: Please backport mspdebug 0.13-1 from natty to maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697154 Title: Please backport mspdebug 0.13-1 from natty to maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/697154/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 724308] Re: Please backport augeas 0.8.0-0ubuntu1 from Natty
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724308 Title: Please backport augeas 0.8.0-0ubuntu1 from Natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/724308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 703292] Re: Backport clementine 0.6-0ubuntu5 to lucid/maverick from natty
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703292 Title: Backport clementine 0.6-0ubuntu5 to lucid/maverick from natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/703292/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 780029] Re: Please backport jags 2.2.0-1 from natty to lucid, maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780029 Title: Please backport jags 2.2.0-1 from natty to lucid, maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/780029/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 724026] Re: Please backport qemu-kvm and libvirt-bin
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724026 Title: Please backport qemu-kvm and libvirt-bin To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/724026/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 723311] Re: backport ubuntu-cheetah to Lucid from Natty
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723311 Title: backport ubuntu-cheetah to Lucid from Natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/723311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 682460] Re: please backport virtualbox-ose 3.2.10 from natty to maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682460 Title: please backport virtualbox-ose 3.2.10 from natty to maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/682460/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 710296] Re: Please backport gnucash 1:2.4.2-1ubuntu1 from natty to maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710296 Title: Please backport gnucash 1:2.4.2-1ubuntu1 from natty to maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/710296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 671038] Re: Please backport kontrolpack (3.0.0) to lucid, maverick
I'm closing the maverick-backports task on this bug due to Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) no longer being supported. This bug is being closed by a bot. If you feel the change was made in error, please feel free to re-open the bug. However, backports requests for Ubuntu 10.10 (Maverick Meerkat) are no longer being accepted. ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671038 Title: Please backport kontrolpack (3.0.0) to lucid, maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/671038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 954798] Re: Please backport tickr 0.6.0-2
Sure, not a problem. Apologies for the delay in review. You've already confirmed that the package b/i/r on Lucid, Natty, and Oneiric, and tickr has no reverse depends. ACK from backporters; should be backported shortly. ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Status: Incomplete = In Progress ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: Incomplete = In Progress ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: lucid-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: natty-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954798 Title: Please backport tickr 0.6.0-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/954798/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 948485] Re: Suspend after undocking laptop doesn't work
Clayton - Thanks for the update. It does sound like your issue was different than mine, but I'm glad it was resolved. (For reference, because it's very difficult to detect whether a laptop is actually docked, upower instead looks at whether or not multiple displays are connected to the laptop, and uses that as a proxy for whether or not the laptop is docked. If you're docking the laptop but not using an external monitor when you do, upower will never set is- docked to true.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948485 Title: Suspend after undocking laptop doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/948485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 980746] [NEW] upower does not check dock state on resume from suspend
Public bug reported: Now that gnome-settings-daemon's power management code checks upower's is-docked flag, it's important that it be accurate. However, it is possible that the inputs to the is-docked state could change while the laptop is suspended without generating a drm udev event to trigger a re-probe. This is fairly easily reproducible: 1. Connect external monitor 2. Suspend using the system menu 3. Disconnect external monitor 4. Wake the laptop back up 5. Close lid I expect the laptop to go to sleep. However, it does not, because upower believes the laptop is still docked (you can confirm this by looking for the is-docked line in upower --dump) Fix for this issue was committed upstream as http://cgit.freedesktop.org/upower/commit/?id=6fb36eb5eb85386d2e1c5d9fb760d68053d8afc5 ** Affects: upower (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: upower (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: upower (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980746 Title: upower does not check dock state on resume from suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/980746/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 948485] Re: Suspend after undocking laptop doesn't work
Hi Clayton - This sounds like it could be related to a bug I just filed (bug #980746). With my bug, the laptop suspends if I choose suspend from the system menu or by pressing the power button, but not if I close the laptop lid. Is that what you see as well? Could you run upower --dump after reproducing this issue, and paste or attach the output? I'm especially interested in the last block of output (starting with Daemon: Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948485 Title: Suspend after undocking laptop doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/948485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 966511] [NEW] Please backport mosh 1.1-1 (universe) from precise
Public bug reported: Please backport mosh 1.1-1 (universe) from precise to lucid, maverick, natty, oneiric. Reason for the backport: mosh is a new remote shell application that uses automatic reconnection and predictive echo to deliver a better experience to mobile clients on potentially laggy connections. It's a new package and has no reverse-dependencies. Lucid needs dh-autoreconf from backports (not a problem since it's pre-NotAutomatic) Testing: Mark off items in the checklist [X] as you test them, but please leave the checklist so that backporters can quickly evaluate the state of testing. You can test-build the backport in your PPA with backportpackage: $ backportpackage -u ppa:lp username/ppa name -s precise -d lucid mosh $ backportpackage -u ppa:lp username/ppa name -s precise -d maverick mosh $ backportpackage -u ppa:lp username/ppa name -s precise -d natty mosh $ backportpackage -u ppa:lp username/ppa name -s precise -d oneiric mosh * lucid: [X] Package builds without modification [X] mosh installs cleanly and runs * maverick: [X] Package builds without modification [X] mosh installs cleanly and runs * natty: [X] Package builds without modification [X] mosh installs cleanly and runs * oneiric: [X] Package builds without modification [X] mosh installs cleanly and runs No reverse dependencies ** Affects: lucid-backports Importance: Wishlist Status: In Progress ** Affects: maverick-backports Importance: Wishlist Status: In Progress ** Affects: natty-backports Importance: Wishlist Status: In Progress ** Affects: oneiric-backports Importance: Wishlist Status: In Progress ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: maverick-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: lucid-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: maverick-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: natty-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966511 Title: Please backport mosh 1.1-1 (universe) from precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/966511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 966511] Re: Please backport mosh 1.1-1 (universe) from precise
ACK from backporters -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966511 Title: Please backport mosh 1.1-1 (universe) from precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/966511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 852603] Re: hedgewars 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with current release
It's unfortunately not that simple. We've always shipped the hedgewars server as part of our packages. To drop the server in a post-release update would not be acceptable. However, the Haskell language has changed enough since early 2010 that the current server will not build using the Haskell packages from 10.04. Unless somebody comes up with a patch that allows us to build the 0.9.17 server on Ubuntu 10.04's Haskell stack, an SRU isn't an option. It may be possible to backport the package. However, due to the requirements of the backports project, one of 2 things would have to happen: either the maverick-proposed packages need to be verified in the next few days (in which case we would backport from maverick-updates to lucid-backports), or we need to wait a month until maverick is EOL (in which case backport policies allow us to backport from precise to lucid- backports). In either case, we need a patch to the packaging to disable the server so that the package builds on Lucid. In any case, there's a lot of work that needs to be done to get hedgewars 0.9.17 into Lucid, and I don't have the time to actively drive this anymore, so somebody else from the community needs to step up to do the development work. If there's nobody that can, then it may be time to accept that we can't offer current versions of hedgewars on an OS that's 2 years old. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852603 Title: hedgewars 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with current release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/852603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 852603] Re: hedgewars 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with current release
Hi Derek - Currently Ubuntu 11.10 has been updated to hedgewars 0.9.17. There are pending updates for Ubuntu 10.10 and 11.04. However, before we can release those updates to the general public, they need to be tested, and so far nobody has stepped up to verify that the new packages work on those releases. To test them, please follow the instructions to enable the maverick- proposed or natty-proposed repositories on your machine (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed) and report back. We can not release the changes until we have some confidence that they will work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852603 Title: hedgewars 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with current release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/852603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 961807] [NEW] [FFe] New package mosh
Public bug reported: mosh is a remote shell updated for the realities of modern network connectivity. It supports roaming (automatically reestablishes connections if they get broken) and predictive local echo (for better perceived interactivity on high-latency connections) Version 1.0 of mosh is currently in Debian unstable (http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mosh.html), and there are daily builds available in a PPA (https://launchpad.net/~keithw/+archive/mosh) with nearly identical packaging. The maintainer (for both Debian and upstream) has informed me that he will be releasing 1.1 in the near future, and has asked we hold off syncing until that is uploaded. Here is the current pending changelog for 1.1: 2012-03-18 Keith Winstein mosh-de...@mit.edu * Version 1.1 released (stable release). * Allows user to specify remote command to execute. * Only advertises 256 colors when user's terminal has 256 colors. * Add chaff to datagrams to frustrate statistical analysis of length * Cosmetic fixes to terminal handling * Improved startup script (Anders Kaseorg) In the mean time, the package has already built in Debian on all architectures except armel, armhf, and both kfreebsd architectures. I've verified that the current Debian package builds on Ubuntu without modifications (log attached), and that the resulting packages work (modulo some locale issues in my chroot) adconrad has volunteered to do the srcNEW review in exchange for cookies. Since we're late in the release process, I was hoping to get release- team approval before 1.1 actually landed so I could get this in as quickly as possible. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Wishlist Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961807 Title: [FFe] New package mosh To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/961807/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 961807] Re: [FFe] New package mosh
** Attachment added: mosh_1.0-1_amd64.build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961807/+attachment/2913944/+files/mosh_1.0-1_amd64.build -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961807 Title: [FFe] New package mosh To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/961807/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 852603] Re: hedgewars 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with current release
Hi Derek - Currently Ubuntu 11.10 has been updated to hedgewars 0.9.17. There are pending updates for Ubuntu 10.10 and 11.04. However, before we can release those updates to the general public, they need to be tested, and so far nobody has stepped up to verify that the new packages work on those releases. To test them, please follow the instructions to enable the maverick- proposed or natty-proposed repositories on your machine (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed) and report back. We can not release the changes until we have some confidence that they will work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852603 Title: hedgewars 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with current release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/852603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 954747] [NEW] vpnc, network-manager-vpnc don't support split DNS VPN attribute
Public bug reported: vpnc requests and fetches the default domain from a Cisco VPN server, but does not request the list of domains for which split DNS is configured. With Precise's new dnsmasq-by-default configuration, this means that only DNS queries for the default domain get routed over the VPN. ** Affects: network-manager-vpnc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) Status: In Progress ** Affects: vpnc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954747 Title: vpnc, network-manager-vpnc don't support split DNS VPN attribute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-vpnc/+bug/954747/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 954747] Re: vpnc does not support split DNS on Cisco VPN servers
** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder) ** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Summary changed: - vpnc does not support split DNS on Cisco VPN servers + vpnc, network-manager-vpnc don't support split DNS VPN attribute ** Also affects: network-manager-vpnc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: network-manager-vpnc (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: network-manager-vpnc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Evan Broder (broder) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954747 Title: vpnc, network-manager-vpnc don't support split DNS VPN attribute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-vpnc/+bug/954747/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 954747] Re: vpnc, network-manager-vpnc don't support split DNS VPN attribute
Here's a patch which queries the VPN server for the list of split DNS domains and passes it onto the vpnc-script. I've tested that it works with my company's VPN server, which lists several internal domain names under the split-dns attribute. However, it's not currently possible for a NetworkManager VPN plugin to pass multiple domains back to NM, so that API will need to be enhanced somehow. ** Patch added: vpnc_0.5.3r512-1ubuntu1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-vpnc/+bug/954747/+attachment/2867586/+files/vpnc_0.5.3r512-1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Triaged ** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu) Assignee: Evan Broder (broder) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: vpnc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: network-manager-vpnc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954747 Title: vpnc, network-manager-vpnc don't support split DNS VPN attribute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-vpnc/+bug/954747/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 394398] Re: Logic to determine expected number of running session wrong (regression in hardy's open-iscsi 2.0.865-1ubuntu3.1)
** Changed in: open-iscsi (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394398 Title: Logic to determine expected number of running session wrong (regression in hardy's open-iscsi 2.0.865-1ubuntu3.1) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/394398/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 907081] Re: vmware-view-client:i386 is shown in software-center on amd64, but is uninstallable
FYI, I looked into multiarching libpcsclite1 when I originally opened this bug, and concluded that it probably couldn't easily be multiarched. Because the protocol headers consist of shoving integers into structs, it's not going to be endianness-agnostic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907081 Title: vmware-view-client:i386 is shown in software-center on amd64, but is uninstallable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vmware-view-client/+bug/907081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: pkgbinarymangler and building translated Sphinx documentation
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com wrote: I sent this to pitti a few days ago, seems like he hasn't had a chance to get to it. In retrospect, he's probably not the only one that has the answer to this question so there's really no reason to have contacted him directly. Additionally, folks on this list might know of packages that could benefit from a rebuild if this change is made. -- Forwarded message -- From: Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com Date: Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:36 PM Subject: pkgbinarymangler and building translated Sphinx documentation To: Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com Hi Martin, I've been working on making the Ubuntu Packaging guide translatable. [1] I ran into an issue with sphinx's .mo files being stripped by pkgbinarymangler. With sphinx, in order to build the translated files you seem to need to have the sphinx.mo files for the languages you want installed. So any package that trys to use sphinx's baked in i18n support won't actually work. It seems this has already been reported against the sphinx source package. [2] Temporarily, we can work around this for the packaging guide, as it's not actually in the archive, by providing a non-stripped version in our PPA. Obviously this isn't ideal, and this might be breaking other packages we're not aware of. David Planella suggested I talk to you. He thinks that there might be an option on pkgbinarymangler (or perhaps it can be specified in the same package, on the control file?) to blacklist a package from getting its translations stripped. Looking through the code for pkgbinarymangler, I don't see a way for a package to opt out of translations on its own. However, there is a way for packages to opt in: the X-Ubuntu-Use-Langpack: yes tag in the control file (http://bit.ly/zOk3jP) - seems like that could be fairly easily extended to support no. Also, there is a blacklist of packages that shouldn't be translated in the pkgbinarymangler package: http://bit.ly/wk9qhM - you could have the packaging guide added to that. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
[Bug 927385] Re: Please backport lives (1.6.1~ds1-1) from precise
Alessio: Incidentally, for future reference, we added a requestbackport script in Precise (it should also be in Wheezy). We're recommending that people use it because the bug template it uses makes clear exactly what has and hasn't been done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927385 Title: Please backport lives (1.6.1~ds1-1) from precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/natty-backports/+bug/927385/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 927385] Re: Please backport lives (1.6.1~ds1-1) from precise
ACK from backporters for natty. ** Changed in: natty-backports Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: natty-backports Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927385 Title: Please backport lives (1.6.1~ds1-1) from precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/natty-backports/+bug/927385/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 948117] Re: Please backport egenix-mx-base 3.2.1-1 from Precise to Oneiric
Because packages from backports are not installed by default, we prefer to only use backports as a way to offer new features, not fix bugs. Bugs in packages should be fixed through the SRU process (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates), so that all users of the package can benefit from the fix. I'm going to go ahead and retarget this as an SRU bug. I'm happy to sponsor the fix; all I need from you is an isolated patch that fixes the crash, and a few sentences for each of the 5 points in step 2 of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure - you can put the writeup in the bug description. ** Also affects: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: oneiric-backports Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948117 Title: Please backport egenix-mx-base 3.2.1-1 from Precise to Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/948117/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884619] Re: Segfault with comparison to None
** Also affects: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884619 Title: Segfault with comparison to None To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/egenix-mx-base/+bug/884619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 948117] Re: Please backport egenix-mx-base 3.2.1-1 from Precise to Oneiric
Normally we prefer to isolate just the necessary changes to fix the bug. In this case, though, the entirety of the 3.2.1 release contains bugfixes. In these cases, we can upload the new release as an SRU. However, I made a mistake opening an SRU task on this bug, since bug #884619 is already tracking the original problem, so I'm going to close out this bug and we can move the discussion there. ** No longer affects: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu Oneiric) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948117 Title: Please backport egenix-mx-base 3.2.1-1 from Precise to Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oneiric-backports/+bug/948117/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884619] Re: Segfault with comparison to None
This has already been fixed in the 3.2.1 upstream release, currently in Precise as 3.2.1-1, so I'm closing the bug against the development release. I've gone ahead and uploaded an microrelease update of 3.2.1 to oneiric- proposed. Somebody from the SRU team should be through to review the SRU. In the mean time, please update the bug description with a few sentences for each of the 5 points mentioned in step 2 of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure ** Changed in: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: egenix-mx-base (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884619 Title: Segfault with comparison to None To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/egenix-mx-base/+bug/884619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884619] Re: Segfault with comparison to None
To clarify above, I chose to update to 3.2.1 not because it's difficult to isolate the relevant patch, but because all of the changes in the 3.2.1 release fix bugs in the code. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884619 Title: Segfault with comparison to None To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/egenix-mx-base/+bug/884619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
