[Bug 1989976]
(In reply to Robert Townley from comment #10) > The short answer is the analogy falls down a little here because these are > master keys. Imagine you have one automobile - a . > You do not have a single Chevy key, but you do have keys for a 78 Mazda GLC, > a BMW, and your house. None of those would work! But you try them and it > is like magic, all three of these master keys unlock the 1957 Chevy Bel Air. [Cross-Device Authentication (CDA)](https://passkeys.dev/docs/reference/terms/#cross-device- authentication-cda) allows your iPhone to vouch for your logon attempt on your Desktop because it is cabled to it or within BlueTooth range. About the time the pandemic arrived in the US, almost all Credit Cards had these chips on them. The contactless nature of these credit cards meant germs were not spread as much. The chip stores a private key. Effectively, TPM hardware in your desktop or laptop or iPhone has one of these credit card chips. The public key can travel all over the internet, but the private key should never ever leave the device it was created on. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989976 Title: [upstream] wishlist: Passkeys should be supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1989976/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1989976]
The short answer is the analogy falls down a little here because these are master keys. Imagine you have one automobile - a . You do not have a single Chevy key, but you do have keys for a 78 Mazda GLC, a BMW, and your house. None of those would work! But you try them and it is like magic, all three of these master keys unlock the 1957 Chevy Bel Air. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989976 Title: [upstream] wishlist: Passkeys should be supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1989976/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1989976]
(In reply to Mildred Ki'Lya from comment #7) > It seems Firefox implemented passkeys for Windows and MacOS but lack support > for Linux as shown in https://www.passkeys.io/compatible-devices > > I don't quite understand what is so platform specific. Of course, integration > in the native platform password manager is nice but not mandatory. Firefox > already stores its passwords and can sync them with Firefox Sync. What's so > different with passkeys and what's the status of this feature? > > As a web developer if I can provide passkeys as the primary login method, > this would be a great step forward, but it'd be better to have full browser > compatibility. PassKeys.io is really saying there is a workaround when they write ["Phone passkeys (QR code flow) and physical security keys only"](https://www.passkeys.io/compatible-devices). The private part of the passkey should never leave the device it was created on, so by design, it should not sync anywhere else. However, if you have a passkey on your cellphone or YubiKey but want to authenticate on your Linux desktop, then Bluetooth ( or a USB cable) connected to your desktop should offer a workaround. It worked for me before but not sure which Linux PC and which web browser on which Linux machine. If your Linux desktop has supported TPM hardware, then i do not see why it would not work. US DOD does it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989976 Title: [upstream] wishlist: Passkeys should be supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1989976/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237941]
(In reply to avada from comment #51) > (In reply to Dave Martin from comment #50) > > I've highlighted this bug many times and (have just checked) my first > > report was 18 years ago in bug 118394 which is still open. Eighteen > > years, please, let's have a fix !!This bug and the lack of a vertical > > tabs option in base Firefox (I use a 3rd party addon, tree style tab, > > wonderful) are major detractions to this browser. > > Just let it go, not going to happen. Use the above mentioned for this > functionality, and other useful ones such as jumping to the searched > bookmark/folder's location on the tree: > https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/bookmark-search-plus-2/ > It opens in the sidebar the same way as the built in sidebar. But a month ago, Mozilla had not announced they were inserting artificial intelligence into our browser. Those neural nets need to vacuum up my 101,109 bookmarks and let me search folders. Better yet, the a.i. will tell us what folder we want before we type it in. [https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1de7bu1/were_the_firefox_leadership_team_at_mozilla_ama/?utm_campaign=Reddit+AMA+with+Firefox+leadership_medium=bitly_source=SUMO+Banner]( Mozilla leadership will be promising that today. They will lean on a.i. to squash all these outstanding bugs. ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237941 Title: Bookmarking Folder Location To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/237941/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1672139]
Mark Banner, why change the status from "affected"? Maybe I not remembering what "---" means in this context. I am on Firefox 77. CTRL+SHIFT+O and perform a search. Hundreds of results returned that need to be grouped together better. But cannot right click on any bookmark to find where it is currently located. So how is not "affected"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139 Title: Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder, parent folder button) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1734411] Re: do-release-upgrade from 10 fails
** Attachment added: "var-log-update-manager" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1734411/+attachment/5014281/+files/var-log-update-manager.tar ** Attachment removed: "Came across an old machine and would love to run a newer OS." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1734411/+attachment/5014274/+files/var-log-update-manager.tar -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734411 Title: do-release-upgrade from 10 fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1734411/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1734411] [NEW] do-release-upgrade from 10 fails
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS Release:10.04 update-manager Version: 1:0.134.7 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: update-manager 1:0.134.12.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-74.142-generic 2.6.32.63+drm33.26 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-74-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Nov 24 21:02:31 2017 GConfNonDefault: /apps/update-manager/show_details=false /apps/update-manager/show_versions=false /apps/update-manager/window_size=No value set for `/apps/update-manager/window_size' InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20110720.1) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade lucid ** Attachment added: "Came across an old machine and would love to run a newer OS." https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734411/+attachment/5014274/+files/var-log-update-manager.tar -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734411 Title: do-release-upgrade from 10 fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1734411/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 706565] Re: configs with dots in file name not working in /etc/cron.d
Actually, /etc/cron.d/ is part of Linux Standards Base Core Specification 4.0. http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_4.0.0/LSB- Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/etc.html Yes, .dpkg-* are ignored for a reason, but that also ignores the LSB FHS. If you installed the lsb packages and expect a Linux Standards Base system, then `run-parts --verbose --lsbsysinit /etc/cron.hourly/` should accept `org.debian.my.cron.job.sh` and `debian.org-cron.job.with.dots.sh` and `job.cron` and other filenames with dots. http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/trusty/en/man8/run-parts.8.html If the --lsbsysinit option is given, then the names must not end in .dpkg-old or .dpkg-dist or .dpkg-new or .dpkg-tmp, and must belong to one or more of the following namespaces: the LANANA-assigned namespace (^[a-z0-9]+$); the LSB hierarchical and reserved namespaces (^_?([a-z0-9_.]+-)+[a-z0-9]+$); and the Debian cron script namespace (^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+$). http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_4.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/etc.html#FHS-NAME-RULES -Linux assigned names says to use dns.name.com names when you do not have a registered name for a particular project. http://www.lanana.org/lsbreg/cron/index.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706565 Title: configs with dots in file name not working in /etc/cron.d To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cron/+bug/706565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 706565] Re: configs with dots in file name not working in /etc/cron.d
It is actually documented further down in the man page and by the linux- foundation.org that these files can have dots, in fact, multiple dots to accomodate dns domain names. ** Changed in: cron (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706565 Title: configs with dots in file name not working in /etc/cron.d To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cron/+bug/706565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1211976] Re: [ 11.063330] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1455 at /build/buildd/linux-3.11.0/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:8286 check_crtc_state+0x58f/0x9c0 [i915]()
** Also affects: linuxmint Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1211976 Title: [ 11.063330] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1455 at /build/buildd/linux-3.11.0/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:8286 check_crtc_state+0x58f/0x9c0 [i915]() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1211976/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
