Re: Adjusting what fstypes df displays

2020-05-29 Thread Tobin Davis
I agree with being able to customize this and Bryce's solution is easy to
work with (either profile.d or a df config in /etc).  We use tmpfs to
create ramdisks on the fly as part of our video analytics solution (megh.com),
and need to monitor the tmpfs we create.

Tobin

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 7:03 AM Robie Basak  wrote:

> +1 for Bryce's approach.
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 10:56:34AM -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> > Perhaps this environment variable should be set by snapd package ?
>
> I think this could be surprising - because we would be hiding all
> squashfs filesystems from df, not just snapd ones. I think it would be
> cleaner to consider that users don't generally want to see squashfs
> stuff in df output by default anyway, and so hide it Ubuntu-wide.
>
> I'm less sure about tmpfs. I can think of occasions where I have wanted
> to see tmpfs usage (since it can run out, and has run out on me before).
> But that's perhaps too much of a specialist case, and so I think it's
> also OK to hide tmpfs by default from df on Ubuntu.
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
>
-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


[Bug 1577927] Re: After upgrade, can no longer set tab titles

2019-03-15 Thread Tobin Davis
This was fixed upstream in 3.20 (with a rather nasty commit message),
but even on 3.28 it is not working in Ubuntu 18.04.  A brief (5 minute)
examination of the code shows that it is there in the Ubuntu source
package.  Someone that actually maintains this will know more of why it
is still broken.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577927

Title:
  After upgrade, can no longer set tab titles

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1577927/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1811122] Re: Cannot use xrdp to login to sesman-Xvnc after 0.6.1-2ubuntu0.1

2019-01-10 Thread Tobin Davis
Tried adding the params Guillaume suggested in #3.  Didn't work for my
systems.  Reverting to 0.6.1-2 does.  Just hope unattended-updates
doesn't overwrite it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811122

Title:
  Cannot use xrdp to login to sesman-Xvnc after 0.6.1-2ubuntu0.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xrdp/+bug/1811122/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1776284] Re: @buy hydrocodone online +209-813-2040

2018-06-15 Thread Tobin Davis
Spam

** Changed in: linux-azure (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Converted to question:
   https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+question/670229

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776284

Title:
  @buy hydrocodone online +209-813-2040

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-azure/+bug/1776284/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: Proposal: Let's drop i386

2018-05-13 Thread Tobin Davis
I've been following this thread for a while, and have some questions.  Are
we talking about dropping Ubuntu x86 images or i386 packages from the
repo?  If the former, I don't see an issue here, as the subs (Lubuntu,
core, etc) can still build release images.  But if Ubuntu is dropping i386
packages, that brings up a huge issue with software compatibility, at a
very bad time (at least for me and the projects I support).  I work with
FPGA accelerators, both at Intel and for a startup.  A majority of the
tools we use (Quartus, Modelsim in particular) only support 32bit (and very
old at that).  The companies developing these tools are all too happy to
ONLY support Redhat Enterprise 6 (and barely RHEL 7), and so far refuse to
budge.  A wide variety of our customer base prefer Ubuntu and have their
infrastructure geared towards this, so I have had to be very creative in
getting everything working for them (adding 32bit support, swapping out the
linker that ships with these tools, etc). If Ubuntu drops i386 all
together, this can have a major impact on the whole FPGAaaS model.

Outside of that, I also have a large collection of older software (games
mainly) that are still fun, but also 32bit only.  Dropping i386 would
render them entirely useless, or force people away from Ubuntu.

The real issue is the costs of maintainership.  I know for a fact that
Ubuntu uses automation for everything in disposable VMs, so the overhead is
minimal (far less than ArmHF or Armel).  That leaves the FTBFS issues,
which if it is in Universe and obscure (Haskell), can safely be ignored or
reported upstream.  Main should be very well supported on all architectures
the packages upstream were designed for, so that should minimize issues.
This leaves image and installer testing.  My vote is to drop the images
(except core as it is very useful for embedded projects which Intel still
sells 32bit only chips for IoT.  This at least keeps Ubuntu as a prime
development environment for these devices.

This is just my opinion based on what I see in the market outside of
desktops, and not representative of the companies I work for.

Tobin Davis


On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com>
wrote:

> On 11 May 2018 at 16:32, Fiedler Roman <roman.fied...@ait.ac.at> wrote:
> >
> > > Von: ubuntu-devel [mailto:ubuntu-devel-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] Im
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Less and less non-amd64-compatible i386 hardware is available for
> > > consumers to buy today from anything but computer part recycling
> centers.
> > > The last of these machines were manufactured over a decade ago, and
> > > support from an increasing number of upstream projects has ended. ...
> > >
> > > ...
> >  >
> > > We still have a relatively high number if i386 downloads but that
> doesn't
> > > mean users machines are not capable of amd64. For the flavors remaining
> > > today on i386 here are some i386 to amd64 ratios for 18.04:
> > >
> > > Lubuntu cdimage - 0.87
> > > Lubuntu tracker - 0.64
> > > ...
> >
> > This decision is not only about numbers, but somehow also about ethics.
> The number of e.g. wheel-chair users or other disabled persons might not be
> relevant for a society/economy in terms of numbers. But we honor the value
> of freedom, also for those, who are not that well off than we are. Those
> would not be able to participate in the same way, if we would not assist
> them by providing support for that minority.
> >
> > So for the i386 discussion, there might be only two distinct groups of
> users worth considering:
> >
> > a) Those, who cannot afford newer systems due to economical reasons.
> >
> > b) Those, who do not want to consume more resources due to ethical
> considerations (that's the one for me): how many people could fed or how
> much CO2 prevented, if all systems were some percent smaller on disk/RAM,
> including IT-system production and operation related resource usage?
> Wasting resources is also about freedom, as we deprive others who cannot
> afford them/fight for them in the same way we can do.
> >
>
> "Consume more resources" is a bit vague. Environmental impact is
> correlated with performance-per-watt measurements. That improves with
> the newer generation of lithography, better support of newer and more
> efficient instruction sets, ability to dynamically clock-down cpu
> cores etc. Thus newer generation CPUs are better performance wise on
> environment front. Depending on how much newer it is, it may even make
> economic sense to upgrade old hardware. Unless one operates complete
> off-grid, on self-harvested renewable energy, e.g.
> https://identi.ca/joeyh/note/mSMKXM3gSluoeC5mP1xIsw
>

Re: Proposal: Let's drop i386

2018-05-13 Thread Tobin Davis
I've been following this thread for a while, and have some questions.  Are
we talking about dropping Ubuntu x86 images or i386 packages from the
repo?  If the former, I don't see an issue here, as the subs (Lubuntu,
core, etc) can still build release images.  But if Ubuntu is dropping i386
packages, that brings up a huge issue with software compatibility, at a
very bad time (at least for me and the projects I support).  I work with
FPGA accelerators, both at Intel and for a startup.  A majority of the
tools we use (Quartus, Modelsim in particular) only support 32bit (and very
old at that).  The companies developing these tools are all too happy to
ONLY support Redhat Enterprise 6 (and barely RHEL 7), and so far refuse to
budge.  A wide variety of our customer base prefer Ubuntu and have their
infrastructure geared towards this, so I have had to be very creative in
getting everything working for them (adding 32bit support, swapping out the
linker that ships with these tools, etc). If Ubuntu drops i386 all
together, this can have a major impact on the whole FPGAaaS model.

Outside of that, I also have a large collection of older software (games
mainly) that are still fun, but also 32bit only.  Dropping i386 would
render them entirely useless, or force people away from Ubuntu.

The real issue is the costs of maintainership.  I know for a fact that
Ubuntu uses automation for everything in disposable VMs, so the overhead is
minimal (far less than ArmHF or Armel).  That leaves the FTBFS issues,
which if it is in Universe and obscure (Haskell), can safely be ignored or
reported upstream.  Main should be very well supported on all architectures
the packages upstream were designed for, so that should minimize issues.
This leaves image and installer testing.  My vote is to drop the images
(except core as it is very useful for embedded projects which Intel still
sells 32bit only chips for IoT.  This at least keeps Ubuntu as a prime
development environment for these devices.

This is just my opinion based on what I see in the market outside of
desktops, and not representative of the companies I work for.

Tobin Davis


On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com>
wrote:

> On 11 May 2018 at 16:32, Fiedler Roman <roman.fied...@ait.ac.at> wrote:
> >
> > > Von: ubuntu-devel [mailto:ubuntu-devel-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] Im
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Less and less non-amd64-compatible i386 hardware is available for
> > > consumers to buy today from anything but computer part recycling
> centers.
> > > The last of these machines were manufactured over a decade ago, and
> > > support from an increasing number of upstream projects has ended. ...
> > >
> > > ...
> >  >
> > > We still have a relatively high number if i386 downloads but that
> doesn't
> > > mean users machines are not capable of amd64. For the flavors remaining
> > > today on i386 here are some i386 to amd64 ratios for 18.04:
> > >
> > > Lubuntu cdimage - 0.87
> > > Lubuntu tracker - 0.64
> > > ...
> >
> > This decision is not only about numbers, but somehow also about ethics.
> The number of e.g. wheel-chair users or other disabled persons might not be
> relevant for a society/economy in terms of numbers. But we honor the value
> of freedom, also for those, who are not that well off than we are. Those
> would not be able to participate in the same way, if we would not assist
> them by providing support for that minority.
> >
> > So for the i386 discussion, there might be only two distinct groups of
> users worth considering:
> >
> > a) Those, who cannot afford newer systems due to economical reasons.
> >
> > b) Those, who do not want to consume more resources due to ethical
> considerations (that's the one for me): how many people could fed or how
> much CO2 prevented, if all systems were some percent smaller on disk/RAM,
> including IT-system production and operation related resource usage?
> Wasting resources is also about freedom, as we deprive others who cannot
> afford them/fight for them in the same way we can do.
> >
>
> "Consume more resources" is a bit vague. Environmental impact is
> correlated with performance-per-watt measurements. That improves with
> the newer generation of lithography, better support of newer and more
> efficient instruction sets, ability to dynamically clock-down cpu
> cores etc. Thus newer generation CPUs are better performance wise on
> environment front. Depending on how much newer it is, it may even make
> economic sense to upgrade old hardware. Unless one operates complete
> off-grid, on self-harvested renewable energy, e.g.
> https://identi.ca/joeyh/note/mSMKXM3gSluoeC5mP1xIsw
>

[Bug 1368094] Re: Please backport openjdk-8 from Xenial to Trusty

2017-10-26 Thread Tobin Davis
So, how does Ubuntu continue to test in their environment, if they are
not supporting OpenJDK-8 in 14.04?  Do they no longer use Jenkins?
Because the current Jenkins LTS releases require Jave 8 for their
slaves.  To add to the 'fun', Oracle has put up additional roadblocks to
downloading JRE-8 to slaves automatically, which really puts everything
in a bind.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to trusty-backports.
Matching subscriptions: ubuntu-backporters
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1368094

Title:
  Please backport openjdk-8 from Xenial to Trusty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/trusty-backports/+bug/1368094/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 1416768] Re: Fontconfig error output due to malformed conf file

2017-06-22 Thread Tobin Davis
This doesn't just affect Steam.  I see the same error when running Cura
(3D printer slicer program).  See attached log.

** Attachment added: "Cura-2.6.0.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1416768/+attachment/4900919/+files/Cura-2.6.0.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416768

Title:
  Fontconfig error output due to malformed conf file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1416768/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1434273] Re: oem-config fails to prompt for password

2016-04-25 Thread Tobin Davis
It appears the fix for this is to add oem-config-prepare to my post-
install preseed config.  Would be nice if that was a step taken by oem-
config installation scripts.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1434273

Title:
  oem-config fails to prompt for password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oem-config/+bug/1434273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1434273] Re: oem-config fails to prompt for password

2016-04-25 Thread Tobin Davis
Someone indicated that they need more details to reproduce this, so here
it goes:

Download the netboot image from http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists
/trusty-updates/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso and
make a bootable usb stick from it using universal usb installer from
http://www.pendrivelinux.com/universal-usb-installer-easy-as-1-2-3/
(Windows) or what ever method your system supports (can be reproduced in
a VM, leaving this initial install as an exercise to the user).  I use
PXE to start the installation.

For boot parameters, use the following (syslinux.cfg):
append initrd=/live/trusty/initrd.gz nomce 
ks=http://myserver.com/preseed/trusty-ks.cfg locale=en_US 
console-setup/ask_detect=false console-setup/layoutcode=us vga=normal 
DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer -- debconf/priority=critical

(see trusty-ks.cfg attached).

During install, the system will prompt asking to confirm NOT to install
grub (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer-
netboot-images/+bug/1309349).  After rebooting, the system will
eventually start oem-config, prompting for language, locale, keyboard
setup, username, and hostname (defaults to kickseed if the above install
was done).  It will NOT prompt for user password.  Instead, it generates
a new user with the SAME PASSWORD as the preseed config.


** Attachment added: "trusty-ks.cfg"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oem-config/+bug/1434273/+attachment/4646836/+files/trusty-ks.cfg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1434273

Title:
  oem-config fails to prompt for password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oem-config/+bug/1434273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1434273] Re: oem-config fails to prompt for password

2016-04-25 Thread Tobin Davis
Note that when I initially filed this bug it was with Ubuntu 12.04.  I
am also seeing this with Ubuntu 14.04.

Any bets that it also affects 16.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1434273

Title:
  oem-config fails to prompt for password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oem-config/+bug/1434273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1434273] Re: oem-config fails to prompt for password

2016-04-24 Thread Tobin Davis
** Tags added: trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1434273

Title:
  oem-config fails to prompt for password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oem-config/+bug/1434273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1438275] Re: GRUB_RECORDFAIL_TIMEOUT prevents servers from booting

2015-03-30 Thread Tobin Davis
Maybe instead of 'degrading the experience', you can just document the
change so that people using this OS for testing systems can automate
around it without having to resort to serial port output scanning and
lab wiring contortion.

In our test environment, we often see a MCE that forces the system to
reboot (even with nomce on the kernel cmdline).  This often causes the
system to reboot and sit at grub.  We worked around the issue by adding
this to /etc/default/grub:

GRUB_TERMINAL='console serial
GRUB_SERIAL_COMMAND=serial --unit=0 --speed=115200 --word=8 --parity=no 
--stop=1

Then we can monitor and automate the serial console for when grub gets
stuck.  It took a while to figure out the correct grub settings as they
too were undocumented.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1438275

Title:
  GRUB_RECORDFAIL_TIMEOUT prevents servers from booting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1438275/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1434273] [NEW] oem-config fails to prompt for password

2015-03-19 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

Running a custom server installation (base server, openssh-server, build
tools, our own SDK in /opt), we have oem-config install as part of the
preseeded network installation.  Post-installation, we bypass oem-config
(alt-F2) and log in with a user created in the preseed installation.
After testing, we ensure oem-config will run (touch /var/lib/oem-
config/run) and reboot one last time to see that it starts ok, then we
power off the system, box it up and ship it to customers.

We have recently had several customers report that oem-config doesn't
prompt for a user password when prompting for a user, and in fact, when
I tested it here, I discovered that the password hash in /etc/shadow
matched the user password created by the preseed.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: oem-config 2.10.29
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-77.114-generic 3.2.66
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-77-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Mar 19 11:58:24 2015
InstallCmdLine: nomce ks=http://atp-lab.jf.intel.com/preseed/precise-ks.cfg 
vga=normal DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer -- debconf/priority=critical locale=en_US 
console-setup/ask_detect=false console-setup/layoutcode=us 
oem=oem-config/enable=true initrd=precise/initrd.gz BOOT_IMAGE=precise/linux
MarkForUpload: True
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=linux
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oem-config precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1434273

Title:
  oem-config fails to prompt for password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1434273/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1200157] Re: zsync does not respect proxy settings

2014-07-31 Thread Tobin Davis
I can verify this still fails on 14.04.1.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200157

Title:
  zsync does not respect proxy settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zsync/+bug/1200157/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1297025] [NEW] Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package

2014-03-24 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

In libssl-dev for both Precise and Saucy packages for libssl-dev, there is a 
broken link:
# ls -l /usr/share/doc/libssl-dev/changelog.gz 
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Jan  8 12:48 /usr/share/doc/libssl-dev/changelog.gz 
- ../libssl1.0.0/changelog.gz
# ls -l /usr/share/doc/libssl1.0.0/changelog.gz 
ls: cannot access /usr/share/doc/libssl1.0.0/changelog.gz: No such file or 
directory

I have verified this in both releases while trying to debug a failing
build of a 3rd party library that links against these.  Build works in
Precise, fails in Saucy.  Was looking to see what changed.

** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297025

Title:
  Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in
  the libssl1.0.0 package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1297025/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: Ubuntu Server seeded package review

2013-12-09 Thread Tobin Davis
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 11:43 -0800, Seth Arnold wrote:
 On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:15:41PM -0600, C de-Avillez wrote:
  Although I am probably hammering a rather cold iron, I still fail to
  understand why ntp is not installed by default. I would expect precise
  timekeeping to be something important on a server (instead of allowing
  the time to drift slowly).
 
 I would like to hear from An Expert if ntpd, ntpdate, ptpd, etc., are
 reasonable things to install in virtual machine guest environments.
 
 My personal suspicion is that when a virtual machine host runs ntpd,
 guests should not run ntpd, since two daemons attempting to skew the
 clock sounds like a recipe for highly chaotic behavior. ntpdate would
 be alright since it does not attempt to manage clock skew. ptpd no idea.
 
 When the virtual machine host does not run ntpd, I suspect ntpd, ntpdate,
 ptpd, are all fine things to run in the guests.
 
 I'd love to know for certain what the best practices are. It might
 influence the default package installs.
 
 Thanks

My personal experience with a VM server running 12.04 and multiple VMs
with various Linux and Windows distros is that while the server is
running ntpd, the guests don't appear to get updated correctly from the
host.  Some of the systems that I have taken the time to point ntpd to
an internal server (we're behind a corporate firewall) are ok, the
others tend to get skewed after a bit.  No idea why.

-- 
-- 

Tobin Davis 

Yes, we will be going to OSI, Mars, and Pluto, but not necessarily in
that order.
-- George Michaelson


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


[Bug 1180880] Re: Crash when starting oem-config on Ubuntu Server 12.04 amd64.

2013-06-06 Thread Tobin Davis
Tested on 12.04.2 amd64.  Works correctly now.  Don't have any other
archs available to test at the moment.

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180880

Title:
  Crash when starting oem-config on Ubuntu Server 12.04 amd64.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1180880/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 685096] Re: USB Passthrough not working for Windows 7 guest

2013-05-30 Thread Tobin Davis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1033727 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033727

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1033727
   USB passthrough doesn't work anymore with qemu-kvm 1.1.1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685096

Title:
  USB Passthrough not working for Windows 7 guest

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/685096/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1073815] Re: Problem with USB passthrough (SmartCard reader)

2013-05-30 Thread Tobin Davis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1033727 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033727

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1033727
   USB passthrough doesn't work anymore with qemu-kvm 1.1.1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073815

Title:
  Problem with USB passthrough (SmartCard reader)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/1073815/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 685096] Re: USB Passthrough not working for Windows 7 guest

2013-05-30 Thread Tobin Davis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1033727 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033727

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1033727
   USB passthrough doesn't work anymore with qemu-kvm 1.1.1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685096

Title:
  USB Passthrough not working for Windows 7 guest

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/685096/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1073815] Re: Problem with USB passthrough (SmartCard reader)

2013-05-30 Thread Tobin Davis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1033727 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033727

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1033727
   USB passthrough doesn't work anymore with qemu-kvm 1.1.1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073815

Title:
  Problem with USB passthrough (SmartCard reader)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/1073815/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1180880] Re: Crash when starting oem-config on Ubuntu Server 12.04 amd64.

2013-05-17 Thread Tobin Davis
I can confirm that this fixes Precise.  I have tested it on both an
amd64 VM (kvm) and raw hardware.

Thanks Colin.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180880

Title:
  Crash when starting oem-config on Ubuntu Server 12.04 amd64.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1180880/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1180880] [NEW] Crash when starting oem-config on Ubuntu Server 12.04 amd64.

2013-05-16 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

After installing Ubuntu Server 12.04 (and 12.04.2) AMD64 edition, then
running oem-config-prepare after post-install  updates and rebooting,
the system hangs during reboot.  Adding debug-oem-config doesn't produce
any new information.  Recovery only possible by booting in rescue mode
from the installation cd (or bootable USB) then removing /var/lib/oem-
config/run and rebooting.

apport-retrace reports the following from the crash report:

root@atp-spare1:/home/lab/bogl-0.1.18# apport-retrace -g 
/var/crash/_usr_bin_bterm.0.crash 
GNU gdb (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.4-2012.04-0ubuntu2.1) 7.4-2012.04
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type show copying
and show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux-gnu.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
http://bugs.launchpad.net/gdb-linaro/.
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/bterm...Reading symbols from 
/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/bterm...done.
done.
[New LWP 1489]
warning: Can't read pathname for load map: Input/output error.
Core was generated by `bterm -f /usr/share/ubiquity/unifont.bgf -- 
/usr/sbin/oem-config --only'.
Program terminated with signal 7, Bus error.
#0  0x00404349 in bogl_font_glyph (font=0x1e10f20, wc=32 L' ', 
bitmap=0x0) at bogl.c:351
351   for (i = font-offset[wc  mask]; font-index[i]; i += 2)
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00404349 in bogl_font_glyph (font=0x1e10f20, wc=32 L' ', 
bitmap=0x0) at bogl.c:351
#1  0x00402891 in bogl_term_new (font=0x1e10f20) at bogl-term.c:41
#2  0x00401c9c in main (argc=6, argv=0x7fff536402e8) at bterm.c:312

The attached crash does NOT have private data, so no need to keep this
bug private.

** Affects: bogl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: _usr_bin_bterm.0.crash
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180880/+attachment/3678421/+files/_usr_bin_bterm.0.crash

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180880

Title:
  Crash when starting oem-config on Ubuntu Server 12.04 amd64.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bogl/+bug/1180880/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1180880] Re: Crash when starting oem-config on Ubuntu Server 12.04 amd64.

2013-05-16 Thread Tobin Davis
Installed system that generated this crash is behind a corporate
firewall, making it impossible to use ubuntu-bug to file.  But it is
fully reproducible on a vm or physical hardware.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180880

Title:
  Crash when starting oem-config on Ubuntu Server 12.04 amd64.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bogl/+bug/1180880/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 761830] Re: grub2 still hands off to blank tty7 on non-Server command-line-only systems and some Server systems

2013-05-16 Thread Tobin Davis
I am seeing this on Ubuntu-12.04-server-amd64 installs on both raw
hardware (standard Intel server platforms) and also when installing in
kvm/qemu.  I am wondering if this is the cause of oem-config crashing on
the ubuntu server installs (lp:1180880).  More testing to see if they
are related.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761830

Title:
  grub2 still hands off to blank tty7 on non-Server command-line-only
  systems and some Server systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/761830/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 987278] Re: virt-manager fails to reap zombies

2013-04-08 Thread Tobin Davis
The actual patch in upstream:

diff --git a/src/virtManager/console.py b/src/virtManager/console.py
index 278db2a..705a023 100644
--- a/src/virtManager/console.py
+++ b/src/virtManager/console.py
@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ class Tunnel(object):
self.errfd = None
os.kill(self.pid, signal.SIGKILL)
+ os.waitpid(self.pid, 0)
self.pid = None
def get_err_output(self):

Simple one-liner.  Would be nice if this could be pushed into the LTS
update process for 12.04.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987278

Title:
  virt-manager fails to reap zombies

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/987278/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: Let's Discuss Interim Releases (and a Rolling Release)

2013-03-02 Thread Tobin Davis
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 16:52 +, Colin Watson wrote:
 On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:12:34PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
  Long gone are the days where a `apt-get upgrade` has broken my system
  (knock on wood) and while I do inspect dist-upgrades a little more
  carefully, they are usually pretty reliable too.
 
 FWIW, I have come to believe that nobody should use 'apt-get upgrade' as
 a general rule.  In particular, since it tries its best to install as
 much as it can under the constraint that it never installs new packages
 or removes installed ones, it will carry merrily on without installing
 any new Recommends introduced by the upgrade set, and you will never
 hear about them again unless some other package starts recommending the
 same target packages.
 
 Just using 'apt-get dist-upgrade' all the time, or something with closer
 semantics to that, is better.
 
 -- 
 Colin Watson   [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
 

Oh, then you've fixed the issue where dist-upgrade removes packages due
to unmet dependencies (aka pool churn)?  dist-upgrade should only be
used within a release, not during development (your words a few years
ago).

I quit tracking the Ubuntu daily builds shortly after 12.04 release
(Canonical people know why).  Have the issues of missing dependencies
been resolved during library update induced pool churn?  Have the issues
of systems not booting due to lack of 3D driver support been addressed?

These are serious issues, and frankly I haven't seen any progress to
indicate otherwise.



Tobin Davis 

One Architecture, One OS also translates as One Egg, One Basket.


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


[Bug 556632] Re: Visual effects during audio playback should be disabled by default on arm

2013-02-15 Thread Tobin Davis
I so wish there was a Don't Care Anymore option.  I filed this while
working on the Ubuntu Arm images.  Like most of my bugs, it was ignored.

** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556632

Title:
  Visual effects during audio playback should be disabled by default on
  arm

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/556632/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 967091] Re: Wrong tint in flash when it uses video acceleration

2012-11-14 Thread Tobin Davis
I just heard about this bug, thought it was an old monitor I had, but
wasn't.

Now here's the rub.  I have an x86 system that started showing this
issue when I upgraded to Precise from Lucid (32bit only for old reasons
- will reimage when I get a chance to backup 500G worth of development
stuff).  My system is a Core2Quad with nVidia 9600GT, and I have dual
monitors setup using nVidia's Separate X Screens configuration.  On my
main monitor, I get this issue.  On the other monitor, I don't.  Video
accelleration is active on both.

I tried installing libvdpau1_0.4.1-6ubuntu1_i386.deb, but it doesn't
appear to have changed anything for me.  Will reboot tomorrow and see if
that helps.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967091

Title:
  Wrong tint in flash when it uses video acceleration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libvdpau/+bug/967091/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 967091] Re: Wrong tint in flash when it uses video acceleration

2012-11-14 Thread Tobin Davis
Nevermind. Restarted firefox and it works now.  Still, quite odd that it
worked on display=:0.1 but not display=:0.0.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967091

Title:
  Wrong tint in flash when it uses video acceleration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libvdpau/+bug/967091/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 998311] Re: package xrdp 0.5.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-06-29 Thread Tobin Davis
I was able to reproduce this issue on an x86_64 Core2Duo system with a
fresh 12.04 install  updates.  After it crashed, I ran 'sudo dpkg
--configure -a' and the postinst script ran fine.

Very odd issue.

** Changed in: xrdp (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Confirmed

** Changed in: xrdp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998311

Title:
  package xrdp 0.5.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
  post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xrdp/+bug/998311/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: Releasing Alphas and Betas without freezing

2012-06-21 Thread Tobin Davis
Thought I would chime in with my thoughts on freezes, snapshot testing,
and QA in general.

Freezes: 
When I was testing the Arm images, there were times when I would go for
weeks without an image.  And if I remember correctly, there was a period
during Natty where there were no images between milestones due to pool
skew.  And there were image specific changes being made at the time
(jasper-initramfs, Ubiquity/oem-config, etc).  When those changes can't
be tested without an image, failures become critical at milestone,
causing a lot of needless stress.

Manual QA:
Having been in a QA role for most of my career in computers (+25 years),
I can site areas where automated QA can and will fail.  Sure, repetitive
tests can be automated, especially server stacks and background
libraries.  But how do you automate testing a GUI for usability
(Evolution STILL has option windows that flow past the bottom of my
netbook screen).  Plus there are tests that find the oddball combination
that most developers don't think users will select (enabling autologin 
encrypted home directory during install was found this way).  When
developing automation scripts for tests, they really should be designed
to test on all platforms, not just simulated/virtualized environments.
Otherwise others have to constantly reinvent the wheel to run the same
test on systems that don't support that test environment.

Snapshot retention:
I set up my own internal mirror so that I could keep daily images
between milestones.  This way if I missed something during daily testing
and we needed to determine how far back it went, I had a complete image
history to go back to (Mono/Banshee in Oneiric).  This also helped to
determine if one package or a combination of package updates caused
issues.

As to testing 15 arm images during milestones, my secret was to take a
daily image for one platform (panda) and focus on it over a period of
2-3 days, testing everything.  Most bugs in applications there were the
same on all arm platforms.  That left hardware specific testing on other
platforms to be done only when testing kernel/xorg updates, or (in the
case of Mono not supporting SMP on arm) reproducing a bug found on the
main test environment.  I would also try to reproduce the bug on
x86/amd64 to determine if the bug was arch specific.  Often times, an
application bug found on the panda would also be found on other
architectures.

While I no longer have the time to test Ubuntu images, I am saddened by
the failures I do see on a daily basis on the LTS release (anyone try to
run a remote desktop lately using rdesktop?).  These issues should have
been found prior to release.


-- 
-- 

Tobin Davis 

The cutting edge is getting rather dull.
-- Andy Purshottam


-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel


[Bug 644037] Re: defaults need adjustment for Dove A0 for audible audio

2012-06-21 Thread Tobin Davis
Maverick is EOL.  No support for this platform going forward.

** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644037

Title:
  defaults need adjustment for Dove A0 for audible audio

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/644037/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 522834] Re: Dove X0 fails to boot past uncompressing the kernel

2012-06-21 Thread Tobin Davis
Marking the Karmic version as won't fix - EOL

** Changed in: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu Karmic)
   Status: Triaged = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522834

Title:
  Dove X0 fails to boot past uncompressing the kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-mvl-dove/+bug/522834/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1011890] [NEW] Flashplugin-installer fails to download flash plugin when behind firewall

2012-06-11 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

When installing flashplugin from inside a corporate firewall, the
flashplugin-installer scripts do not honor the system wide proxy
settings, and in fact do not even get the settings from the environment.

I can download the file manually with curl, wget, and firefox without
problem, both as a user and as sudo.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: flashplugin-installer 11.2.202.236ubuntu0.12.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Jun 11 16:18:50 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120425)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011890

Title:
  Flashplugin-installer fails to download flash plugin when behind
  firewall

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1011890/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1011890] Re: Flashplugin-installer fails to download flash plugin when behind firewall

2012-06-11 Thread Tobin Davis
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011890

Title:
  Flashplugin-installer fails to download flash plugin when behind
  firewall

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/1011890/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 571011] Re: ubiquity-dm crashed with ValueError in command()

2012-05-31 Thread Tobin Davis
Since this image is now out of support (18 months for arm prior to
12.04), can this just be closed?  It was on a tech preview image for a
beagle platform.  This hasn't been seen in quite some time.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571011

Title:
  ubiquity-dm crashed with ValueError in command()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/571011/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 994368] Re: linux-ti-omap4 kernel panics on pandaboard ES

2012-05-04 Thread Tobin Davis
Could you add information on which kernel and which image this is?

** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994368

Title:
  linux-ti-omap4 kernel panics on pandaboard ES

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ti-omap4/+bug/994368/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 42600] Re: Microphone does not work on Dell Inspiron 630m

2012-04-30 Thread Tobin Davis
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 990211
   Mic not working in Ubuntu 12.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42600

Title:
  Microphone does not work on Dell Inspiron 630m

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/42600/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 354707] Re: [Jaunty] Microphone doesn't work at all on Eee 900

2012-04-30 Thread Tobin Davis
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 990211
   Mic not working in Ubuntu 12.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354707

Title:
  [Jaunty] Microphone doesn't work at all on Eee 900

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/354707/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 440251] Re: Internal microphone does not work on Lenovo X300

2012-04-30 Thread Tobin Davis
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 990211
   Mic not working in Ubuntu 12.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440251

Title:
  Internal microphone does not work on Lenovo X300

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/440251/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 442457] Re: No microphone on Dell Vostro 1320 when connecting external mic

2012-04-30 Thread Tobin Davis
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 990211
   Mic not working in Ubuntu 12.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442457

Title:
  No microphone on Dell Vostro 1320 when connecting external mic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/442457/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 605042] Re: [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4

2012-04-30 Thread Tobin Davis
Marked one task as fix-released as I was actively running java  jenkins
on Maverick omap/omap4 SRU testing.

** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Maverick)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605042

Title:
  [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-misc/+bug/605042/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 416313] Re: [arm] large file copy fails from a vfat filesystem through samba

2012-04-19 Thread Tobin Davis
I have failed to reproduce this in precise using the following setup:

Samba server (Panda):
3 20G LVM partitions (vfat, ext4, ntfs)

Clients:
Windows XP Pro
Windows 7 Home Starter Edition.

I used a daily-preinstalled desktop omap4.img.gz as the payload file,
copying it to each of the above 3 samba share points.  I then ran md5sum
on the panda to verify the image files.  The only issue I have seen is
the vfat partition somehow was given a date stamp of Dec 31, 1969 (could
be a vfat or samba issue - unsure).  Other than that, I had no issues
copying the files.

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313

Title:
  [arm] large file copy fails from a vfat filesystem through samba

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/416313/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 416313] Re: [arm] large file copy fails from a vfat filesystem through samba

2012-04-19 Thread Tobin Davis
I have failed to reproduce this in precise using the following setup:

Samba server (Panda):
3 20G LVM partitions (vfat, ext4, ntfs)

Clients:
Windows XP Pro
Windows 7 Home Starter Edition.

I used a daily-preinstalled desktop omap4.img.gz as the payload file,
copying it to each of the above 3 samba share points.  I then ran md5sum
on the panda to verify the image files.  The only issue I have seen is
the vfat partition somehow was given a date stamp of Dec 31, 1969 (could
be a vfat or samba issue - unsure).  Other than that, I had no issues
copying the files.

** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416313

Title:
  [arm] large file copy fails from a vfat filesystem through samba

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/416313/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 984007] Re: netinst d-i fails on armadaxp

2012-04-17 Thread Tobin Davis
** Also affects: eglibc (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress = Invalid

** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Critical

** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Adam Conrad (adconrad)

** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/984007

Title:
  netinst d-i fails on armhf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eilt/+bug/984007/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 984180] [NEW] ext2 module missing from fs-core-modules udeb.

2012-04-17 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

The ext2 module is missing from the fs-core-modules udeb package used by
netboot to run guided partitioning during installation on both omap4 and
armadaxp kernels.  This causes the installer to fail when trying to
mount /boot as ext2.

diff -u debian.master/d-i/modules/fs-core-modules 
debian.ti-omap4/d-i/modules/fs-core-modules
--- debian.master/d-i/modules/fs-core-modules   2012-01-13 10:30:32.0 
+
+++ debian.ti-omap4/d-i/modules/fs-core-modules 2012-04-11 21:52:55.0 
+
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-ext2 
 jfs 
reiserfs 
xfs

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: linux-omap4 3.2.0.1412.12
ProcVersionSignature: User Name 3.2.0-1412.15-omap4 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-1412-omap4 armv7l
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu4
Architecture: armhf
Date: Tue Apr 17 10:05:23 2012
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=vt102
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LANGUAGE=en_US:
SourcePackage: linux-meta-ti-omap4
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: eilt
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: High
 Status: Triaged


** Tags: apport-bug armhf precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/984180

Title:
  ext2 module missing from fs-core-modules udeb.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eilt/+bug/984180/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 984180] Re: ext2 module missing from fs-core-modules udeb.

2012-04-17 Thread Tobin Davis
** Also affects: eilt
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: linux-meta-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Package changed: linux-meta-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu) = linux-ti-omap4
(Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/984180

Title:
  ext2 module missing from fs-core-modules udeb.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eilt/+bug/984180/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 984180] Re: ext2 module missing from fs-core-modules udeb.

2012-04-17 Thread Tobin Davis
My bad on the armadaxp inclusion.  Multiple issues going on, got caught
in the crossfire (and I assumed the config was the same as omap4, as it
was copied from there initially).

** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/984180

Title:
  ext2 module missing from fs-core-modules udeb.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eilt/+bug/984180/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 968780] Re: linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.47 -proposed tracker

2012-04-17 Thread Tobin Davis
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/security-signoff
 Assignee: C de-Avillez (hggdh2) = (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968780

Title:
  linux-ec2: 2.6.32-345.47 -proposed tracker

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/968780/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 848782] Re: Serial console not enabled for passphrase prompt when using LUKS

2012-04-04 Thread Tobin Davis
** Changed in: flash-kernel (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress = Confirmed

** Changed in: flash-kernel (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Tobin Davis (gruemaster) = (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848782

Title:
  Serial console not enabled for passphrase prompt when using LUKS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-kernel/+bug/848782/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 971608] Re: Unable to create blank lvm volume in preseed install

2012-04-03 Thread Tobin Davis
Looks like I had an extra space in the recipe, and adding d-i partman-
basicmethods/method_only boolean false also was required.  Closing this
bug.

** Changed in: partman-auto-lvm (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Changed in: eilt
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971608

Title:
  Unable to create blank lvm volume in preseed install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eilt/+bug/971608/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 971608] [NEW] Unable to create blank lvm volume in preseed install

2012-04-02 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

I am trying to create a preseeded netboot install that will create a
couple of blank partitions that can be used for testing purposes.  The
partition scheme is as follows:

sda1 256M ext3 /boot
sda2 20G blank #Test-Primary
sda3 extended
sda5 LVM VG0
VG0/Root 10G ext4 /
VG0/Swap 4G swap
VG0/Test-LVM 20G blank #Test-LVM

My recipe is this:

d-i partman-auto/expert_recipe string \
  panda-pool ::   \
  100 150 256 ext3\
  $primary{ } $bootable{ }\
  method{ format } format { } \
  use_filesystem{ } filesystem{ ext3 }\
  mountpoint{ /boot } \
  label{ BOOT }   \
  .   \
  5000 160 2 ext4 \
  $lvmignore{ }   \
  $primary{ } \
  method{ keep }  \
  .   \
  1 250 12000 ext4\
  $defaultignore{ }   \
  $lvmok{ }   \
  lv_name{ Root } \
  method{ format } format{ }  \
  use_filesystem{ } filesystem{ ext4 }\
  mountpoint{ / } \
  .   \
  4000 512 4100 linux-swap\
  $defaultignore{ }   \
  $lvmok{ }   \
  lv_name{ swap } \
  method{ swap } format{ }\
  .   \
  5000 1 10 ext4  \
  $defaultignore{ }   \
  $lvmok{ }   \
  method{ keep }  \
  .   \
  .


The problem is, netboot will prompt me with an alert saying No file system is 
specified for partition #1 of LVM VG eilt0, LV keep_1.

If I add use_filesystem{ } filesystem{ ext4 } \  to the blank lvm
partition, then it complains about not being formatted.  If I change the
method to format it, then it wants a mountpoint.  The idea is to leave
it unmounted so that it can be used for testing different filesystems,
filesystem encryption, etc.  Having to go through all this defeats the
purpose.

The base documentation at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i
/debian-installer.git;a=blob_plain;f=doc/devel/partman-auto-
recipe.txt;hb=HEAD  indicates this should be possible, although the
documentation is very sparse.  Other google searches show examples where
users have created udeb packages to replace partman entirely.  This is
also not an option.

** Affects: partman-auto-lvm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971608

Title:
  Unable to create blank lvm volume in preseed install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto-lvm/+bug/971608/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 971608] Re: Unable to create blank lvm volume in preseed install

2012-04-02 Thread Tobin Davis
** Attachment added: preseed.cfg
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto-lvm/+bug/971608/+attachment/2989624/+files/preseed.cfg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971608

Title:
  Unable to create blank lvm volume in preseed install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto-lvm/+bug/971608/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 940025] Re: [public] armadaxp net installer fails to properly encrypt disks (dm-crypt)

2012-04-02 Thread Tobin Davis
This bug may be related to bug 848782.  Further investigating required.
Is console=ttyS0,115200 in the kernel cmdline?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940025

Title:
  [public] armadaxp net installer fails to properly encrypt disks (dm-
  crypt)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eilt/+bug/940025/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 968486] [NEW] No application icons on unity dash on initial login.

2012-03-29 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

This may be the wrong package, but on initial boot with the armhf
preinstalled images for omap  mx5, no icons are present in the dash,
and the search function doesn't list any applications when entered.
Logging out and logging in fixes this issue.

Steps to reproduce:

Download the Precise Beta 2 preinstaled image for either omap or mx5,
flash to SD and boot on the appropriate system.

During oem-config, when prompted, select auto-login.

Once oem-config runs its course, the user will be logged in.  Select the
dash, and try to find an application by either search or selecting the
applications icon at the bottom of the dash window.  Filters are also
blank.  See attached screenshot.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: unity-2d 5.8.0-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: User Name 3.1.1-1400.1-linaro-lt-mx5 3.1.1
Uname: Linux 3.1.1-1400-linaro-lt-mx5 armv7l
ApportVersion: 1.95-0ubuntu1
Architecture: armhf
Date: Thu Mar 29 11:22:08 2012
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=xterm
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: unity-2d
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: unity-2d (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armhf precise unity-2d

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968486

Title:
  No application icons on unity dash on initial login.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/968486/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 968486] Re: No application icons on unity dash on initial login.

2012-03-29 Thread Tobin Davis
** Attachment added: Screenshot from 2012-03-29 11:21:09.png
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968486/+attachment/2962102/+files/Screenshot%20from%202012-03-29%2011%3A21%3A09.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968486

Title:
  No application icons on unity dash on initial login.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-2d/+bug/968486/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 968554] [NEW] Kernel oops on omap when removing SD, even though it wasn't mounted

2012-03-29 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

After installing the netboot image for omap, I went to remove the SD
card to reflash of further testing.  This cause the running system to
oops, even though the root filesystem was on a usb sata drive and the SD
drive was not mounted.

From syslog:

Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.356964] Unable to handle kernel NULL 
pointer dereference at virtual address 
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.357299] pgd = c0004000
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.357391] [] *pgd=
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.357543] Internal error: Oops: 8007 
[#1]
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.357727] Modules linked in: joydev 
smsc95xx usbhid usbnet hid twl4030_madc_hwmon omap_wdt snd_soc_twl4030 
snd_soc_core snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore twl4030_madc twl4030_pwrbutton 
snd_page_alloc spi_omap2_mcspi gpio_keys leds_gpio usb_storage uas
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.358795] CPU: 0Not tainted  
(3.2.0-20-omap #33-Ubuntu)
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.359008] PC is at 0x0
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.359130] LR is at 
handle_nested_irq+0x6c/0xb0
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.359283] pc : []lr : 
[c0096c5c]psr: 400f0013
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.359313] sp : df4f3f50  ip : c04b59c0  fp 
: 
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.359680] r10: c071c940  r9 :   r8 
: 0001
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.359863] r7 :   r6 : c06f8048  r5 
: 0180  r4 : c0726dd8
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.360107] r3 :   r2 : dee11580  r1 
: dee12ac0  r0 : 0180
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.360321] Flags: nZcv  IRQs on  FIQs on  
Mode SVC_32  ISA ARM  Segment kernel
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.360595] Control: 10c5387d  Table: 
9d858019  DAC: 0015
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.360778] Process irq/7-TWL4030-P (pid: 21, 
stack limit = 0xdf4f22e8)
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.361022] Stack: (0xdf4f3f50 to 0xdf4f4000)
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.361175] 3f40: 
0012 c04e4b48 df4f4100 c02ea164
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.361450] 3f60: 0001 2800223c c07266d8 
0170 0001 c071c8e8 c06f8980 c0096c5c
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.361755] 3f80: 0001 0170 df4f2000 
c02ea0ac  0171c940 df4d1dc0 c00956fc
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.362060] 3fa0: 0013 c071c944  
df43dcf0 df4d1dc0 c00955fc 0013 
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.362335] 3fc0:    
c0062130   df4d1dc0 
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.362609] 3fe0: df4f3fe0 df4f3fe0 df43dcf0 
c00620b0 c0013d60 c0013d60  
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.362915] [c0096c5c] 
(handle_nested_irq+0x6c/0xb0) from [c02ea164] (handle_twl4030_sih+0x90/0xec)
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.363250] [c02ea164] 
(handle_twl4030_sih+0x90/0xec) from [c0096c5c] (handle_nested_irq+0x6c/0xb0)
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.363616] [c0096c5c] 
(handle_nested_irq+0x6c/0xb0) from [c02ea0ac] (handle_twl4030_pih+0x60/0x88)
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.363922] [c02ea0ac] 
(handle_twl4030_pih+0x60/0x88) from [c00956fc] (irq_thread+0x100/0x1b0)
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.364257] [c00956fc] 
(irq_thread+0x100/0x1b0) from [c0062130] (kthread+0x80/0x88)
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.364562] [c0062130] (kthread+0x80/0x88) 
from [c0013d60] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.364837] Code: bad PC value
Mar 29 12:34:39 ubuntu kernel: [  263.365020] ---[ end trace 91d6812f67b436f7 
]---

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-20-omap 3.2.0-20.33
ProcVersionSignature: User Name 3.2.0-20.33-omap 3.2.12
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-20-omap armv7l
AcpiTables:
 
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24.
AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
ApportVersion: 1.95-0ubuntu1
Architecture: armel
ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', 
'/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1:
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Date: Thu Mar 29 12:42:41 2012
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=8cbb8429-9a98-41e5-ba7e-32aeac38510f
IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
PciMultimedia:
 
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=vt102
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LANGUAGE=en_US:
ProcFB:
 0 omapfb
 1 omapfb
 2 omapfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: root=UUID=e2fd79f0-6b47-4865-b7cc-70d26d009ed1 ro quiet 
splash
RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Incomplete


** Tags: apport-bug armel precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 968554] Re: Kernel oops on omap when removing SD, even though it wasn't mounted

2012-03-29 Thread Tobin Davis
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968554

Title:
  Kernel oops on omap when removing SD, even though it wasn't mounted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/968554/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 925246] Re: ksysguardd is causing a kernel oops on armhf only

2012-03-29 Thread Tobin Davis
Yes.  Just reproduced with the kubuntu beta2 release candidate image on
omap4.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kde-workspace in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925246

Title:
  ksysguardd is causing a kernel oops on armhf only

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kde-workspace/+bug/925246/+subscriptions

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 966858] Re: [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gnome_rr_screen_get_dpms_mode()

2012-03-29 Thread Tobin Davis
I did some further investigating on this, and I don't thing this is a
dup of bug #956824.   This bug occurs on the preinstalled images during
oem-config setup.  Once logged in, the bug never reoccurs.

Also, I hacked the Beta 2 image to update to gnome-settings-
daemon_3.4.0-0ubuntu2_armhf.deb (which fixed bug #956824), and still see
the error during the same phase.

Running apport-retrace on the crash file doesn't produce much helpful
info (corrupt stack).  Trying manual debugging from
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash (although since this
happens only during oem-config, not sure how far I will get).

Oh, and don't bother waiting for the retracers.  They don't work on
armel/armhf bugs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966858

Title:
  [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in
  gnome_rr_screen_get_dpms_mode()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/966858/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 965508] [NEW] tasksel not preseedable in oem-config

2012-03-26 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

In current oem-config (2.10.2), setting tasksel tasksel/tasks
multiselect openssh-server fails to install openssh-server, or other
tasks.  This is highly valuable to preinstalled-image automation
testing, as otherwise the only option is to login through serial
console, which isn't enabled by default on desktop images (only server).

One suggestion was to enable  tasksel --new-install and tasksel/first
for oem-config, so as not to disrupt user ability to run tasksel
installs post-install.

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965508

Title:
  tasksel not preseedable in oem-config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/965508/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 965512] [NEW] Unable to preseed individual package installation in oem-config

2012-03-26 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

With the current oem-config (2.10.2), I am unable to preseed individual
package installations with d-i pkgsel/include string openjdk-6-jre-
headless python-software-properties.  This is necessary for
preinstalled image test automation for applications like jenkins, and
other possible deployment automation scenarios.

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965512

Title:
  Unable to preseed individual package installation in oem-config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/965512/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 965568] [NEW] Unable to derive hostname via dhcp in oem-config

2012-03-26 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

With oem-config 2.10.2 using preseed to automate installation, I am
unable to set the hostname via dhcp as I am in netboot.  Netboot uses
d-i netcfg/get_hostname string unassigned-hostname and d-i
netcfg/get_domain string unassigned-domain to determine the hostname 
domain during preseed installation, and works well on all architectures
in my network (amd64, i386, armel, armhf).  oem-config should be able to
use the same mechanism or something similar.

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965568

Title:
  Unable to derive hostname via dhcp in oem-config

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/965568/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 856988] Re: totem cannot play quicktime file after upgrade to oneiric

2012-03-23 Thread Tobin Davis
This is not an arm issue.  Unassigning the ubuntu-arm team.

** Changed in: gstreamer0.10 (Ubuntu Precise)
 Assignee: Ubuntu ARM Team (ubuntu-arm) = (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856988

Title:
  totem cannot play quicktime file after upgrade to oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer0.10/+bug/856988/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 963512] [NEW] Latest kernel updates broke video on omap4

2012-03-23 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

The latest ubuntu-desktop image (20120323) fails to show video out.
This report was generated from the ubuntu-server daily image so that
login was possible via serial console.

From dmesg:

[0.367279] [ cut here ]
[0.367309] WARNING: at 
/build/buildd/linux-ti-omap4-3.2.0/fs/sysfs/dir.c:481 sysfs_add_one+0x8c/0xac()
[0.367309] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename 
'/devices/platform/omap/omapdss_dss'
[0.367309] Modules linked in:
[0.367370] [c0015cd0] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xec) from [c0632114] 
(dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
[0.367401] [c0632114] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [c0052fc0] 
(warn_slowpath_common+0x5c/0x74)
[0.367431] [c0052fc0] (warn_slowpath_common+0x5c/0x74) from [c0053094] 
(warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48)
[0.367462] [c0053094] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48) from [c0199678] 
(sysfs_add_one+0x8c/0xac)
[0.367462] [c0199678] (sysfs_add_one+0x8c/0xac) from [c0199708] 
(create_dir+0x70/0xc4)
[0.367492] [c0199708] (create_dir+0x70/0xc4) from [c0199810] 
(sysfs_create_dir+0x80/0x98)
[0.367523] [c0199810] (sysfs_create_dir+0x80/0x98) from [c02fefb4] 
(kobject_add_internal+0xd8/0x1b4)
[0.367553] [c02fefb4] (kobject_add_internal+0xd8/0x1b4) from [c02ff398] 
(kobject_add+0x74/0x94)
[0.367584] [c02ff398] (kobject_add+0x74/0x94) from [c03935d8] 
(device_add+0xbc/0x35c)
[0.367614] [c03935d8] (device_add+0xbc/0x35c) from [c0397828] 
(platform_device_add+0x118/0x174)
[0.367645] [c0397828] (platform_device_add+0x118/0x174) from [c0035324] 
(omap_device_build_ss+0x104/0x164)
[0.367675] [c0035324] (omap_device_build_ss+0x104/0x164) from 
[c00353dc] (omap_device_build+0x58/0x60)
[0.367706] [c00353dc] (omap_device_build+0x58/0x60) from [c0962424] 
(omap_display_init+0xb0/0x12c)
[0.367736] [c0962424] (omap_display_init+0xb0/0x12c) from [c0030370] 
(omap4_panda_display_init+0xec/0x10c)
[0.367767] [c0030370] (omap4_panda_display_init+0xec/0x10c) from 
[c09665cc] (omap4_panda_init+0x1bc/0x248)
[0.367797] [c09665cc] (omap4_panda_init+0x1bc/0x248) from [c095b77c] 
(customize_machine+0x24/0x30)
[0.367828] [c095b77c] (customize_machine+0x24/0x30) from [c000876c] 
(do_one_initcall+0xa0/0x170)
[0.367828] [c000876c] (do_one_initcall+0xa0/0x170) from [c09589c4] 
(kernel_init+0xc0/0x168)
[0.367858] [c09589c4] (kernel_init+0xc0/0x168) from [c000ee84] 
(kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
[0.367889] ---[ end trace da227214a82491b9 ]---
[0.367889] kobject_add_internal failed for omapdss_dss with -EEXIST, don't 
try to register things with the same name in the same directory.
[0.367919] [c0015cd0] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xec) from [c0632114] 
(dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
[0.367950] [c0632114] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [c02ff050] 
(kobject_add_internal+0x174/0x1b4)
[0.367980] [c02ff050] (kobject_add_internal+0x174/0x1b4) from 
[c02ff398] (kobject_add+0x74/0x94)
[0.368011] [c02ff398] (kobject_add+0x74/0x94) from [c03935d8] 
(device_add+0xbc/0x35c)
[0.368041] [c03935d8] (device_add+0xbc/0x35c) from [c0397828] 
(platform_device_add+0x118/0x174)
[0.368041] [c0397828] (platform_device_add+0x118/0x174) from [c0035324] 
(omap_device_build_ss+0x104/0x164)
[0.368072] [c0035324] (omap_device_build_ss+0x104/0x164) from 
[c00353dc] (omap_device_build+0x58/0x60)
[0.368103] [c00353dc] (omap_device_build+0x58/0x60) from [c0962424] 
(omap_display_init+0xb0/0x12c)
[0.368133] [c0962424] (omap_display_init+0xb0/0x12c) from [c0030370] 
(omap4_panda_display_init+0xec/0x10c)
[0.368164] [c0030370] (omap4_panda_display_init+0xec/0x10c) from 
[c09665cc] (omap4_panda_init+0x1bc/0x248)
[0.368194] [c09665cc] (omap4_panda_init+0x1bc/0x248) from [c095b77c] 
(customize_machine+0x24/0x30)
[0.368194] [c095b77c] (customize_machine+0x24/0x30) from [c000876c] 
(do_one_initcall+0xa0/0x170)
[0.368225] [c000876c] (do_one_initcall+0xa0/0x170) from [c09589c4] 
(kernel_init+0xc0/0x168)
[0.368255] [c09589c4] (kernel_init+0xc0/0x168) from [c000ee84] 
(kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
[0.368286] omap_device: omapdss_dss: build failed (-17)
[0.368286] [ cut here ]
[0.368316] WARNING: at 
/build/buildd/linux-ti-omap4-3.2.0/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c:226 
omap_display_init+0xcc/0x12c()
[0.368316] Could not build omap_device for dss_core
[0.368316] Modules linked in:
[0.368347] [c0015cd0] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xec) from [c0632114] 
(dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
[0.368377] [c0632114] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [c0052fc0] 
(warn_slowpath_common+0x5c/0x74)
[0.368408] [c0052fc0] (warn_slowpath_common+0x5c/0x74) from [c0053094] 
(warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48)
[0.368438] [c0053094] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48) from [c0962440] 
(omap_display_init+0xcc/0x12c)
[0.368438] [c0962440] (omap_display_init+0xcc/0x12c) from [c0030370] 
(omap4_panda_display_init+0xec/0x10c)
[0.368469] [c0030370] (omap4_panda_display_init+0xec/0x10c) from 
[c09665cc] 

[Bug 963512] Re: Latest kernel updates broke video on omap4

2012-03-23 Thread Tobin Davis
** Attachment added: dmesg
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963512/+attachment/2925276/+files/dmesg

** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963512

Title:
  Latest kernel updates broke video on omap4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ti-omap4/+bug/963512/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 963512] Re: Latest kernel updates broke video on omap4

2012-03-23 Thread Tobin Davis
Marked as confirmed as others in #ubuntu-arm have seen this issue as
well.

[09:20:26] jimerickson GrueMaster: am not getting any hdmi output
after todays update either.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/963512

Title:
  Latest kernel updates broke video on omap4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ti-omap4/+bug/963512/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 961174] Re: flash-kernel fails to override uEnv.txt

2012-03-22 Thread Tobin Davis
I uploaded a patch that will move any *.txt files in the bootpart to
*.txt.bak.  This should eliminate issues on all supported use cases.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961174

Title:
  flash-kernel fails to override uEnv.txt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-kernel/+bug/961174/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 960340] Re: Extra debug printk in route.c rt_may_expire

2012-03-22 Thread Tobin Davis
** No longer affects: eilt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960340

Title:
  Extra debug printk in route.c rt_may_expire

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-armadaxp/+bug/960340/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 960761] [NEW] Typo in template files for mysql pgsql director packages

2012-03-20 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

When installing bacula-director-[mysql|pgsql] I get errors similar to this:
debconf: Unknown template field '_description', in stanza #1 of 
/tmp/bacula-director-pgsql.template.40256

Tracking it down, I discovered this is due to a typo in the template
files.  The lines beginning with _Description, should be
Description.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: bacula-director-mysql 5.2.5-0ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: User Name 3.2.0-1409.12-omap4 3.2.9
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-1409-omap4 armv7l
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: armhf
Date: Tue Mar 20 17:05:52 2012
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=screen-bce
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LANGUAGE=en_US:
SourcePackage: bacula
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: bacula (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armhf precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960761

Title:
  Typo in template files for mysql  pgsql director packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/960761/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 960761] Re: Typo in template files for mysql pgsql director packages

2012-03-20 Thread Tobin Davis
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960761

Title:
  Typo in template files for mysql  pgsql director packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/960761/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 960761] Re: Typo in template files for mysql pgsql director packages

2012-03-20 Thread Tobin Davis
Patch to fix this bug.

** Patch added: bacula-960761.patch
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/960761/+attachment/2907157/+files/bacula-960761.patch

** Tags added: patch

** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960761

Title:
  Typo in template files for mysql  pgsql director packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/960761/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 959604] Re: [public] bad: scheduling from the idle thread!

2012-03-20 Thread Tobin Davis
** Also affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Bryan Wu (cooloney)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959604

Title:
  [public] bad: scheduling from the idle thread!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eilt/+bug/959604/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 959604] Re: [public] bad: scheduling from the idle thread!

2012-03-20 Thread Tobin Davis
** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959604

Title:
  [public] bad: scheduling from the idle thread!

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eilt/+bug/959604/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 960340] [NEW] Extra debug printk in route.c rt_may_expire

2012-03-20 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

The patchset from Marvell included a debugging printk that should be
removed prior to release.  THis printk spams syslog with
[151184.452453] rt_may_expire: messages.

This is the patch that created it:

diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 94cdbc5..59c8467 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
.
.
.
@@ -687,10 +700,18 @@ static int rt_may_expire(struct rtable *rth, unsigned 
long tmo1, unsigned long t
 {
unsigned long age;
int ret = 0;
-
+   printk(%s:\n, __func__);
if (atomic_read(rth-dst.__refcnt))
goto out;

+#if defined(CONFIG_MV_ETH_NFP_FIB_LEARN)
+   if (rth-nfp) {
+   if (nfp_hook_fib_rule_age(AF_INET,(u8 *)(rth-rt_src), (u8 
*)(rth-rt_dst),
+   rth-rt_iif, 
rth-dst.dev-ifindex))
+   rth-dst.lastuse = jiffies;
+   }
+#endif /* CONFIG_MV_ETH_NFP_FIB_LEARN */
+
age = jiffies - rth-dst.lastuse;
if ((age = tmo1  !rt_fast_clean(rth)) ||
(age = tmo2  rt_valuable(rth)))
.
.
.

(there is more to the patch, but the printk line above should be
removed).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: linux-armadaxp 3.2.0.1600.1
ProcVersionSignature: User Name 3.2.0-1600.3-armadaxp 3.2.9
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-1600-armadaxp armv7l
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: armhf
Date: Tue Mar 20 08:56:55 2012
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=screen-bce
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LANGUAGE=en_US:
SourcePackage: linux-meta-armadaxp
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: eilt
 Importance: High
 Status: New

** Affects: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: High
 Assignee: Bryan Wu (cooloney)
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armhf bot-stop-nagging precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960340

Title:
  Extra debug printk in route.c rt_may_expire

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eilt/+bug/960340/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 960340] Re: Extra debug printk in route.c rt_may_expire

2012-03-20 Thread Tobin Davis
** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging

** Package changed: linux-meta-armadaxp (Ubuntu) = linux-armadaxp
(Ubuntu)

** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = High

** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Bryan Wu (cooloney)

** Also affects: eilt
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: eilt
   Importance: Undecided = High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960340

Title:
  Extra debug printk in route.c rt_may_expire

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eilt/+bug/960340/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 960761] [NEW] Typo in template files for mysql pgsql director packages

2012-03-20 Thread Tobin Davis
Public bug reported:

When installing bacula-director-[mysql|pgsql] I get errors similar to this:
debconf: Unknown template field '_description', in stanza #1 of 
/tmp/bacula-director-pgsql.template.40256

Tracking it down, I discovered this is due to a typo in the template
files.  The lines beginning with _Description, should be
Description.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: bacula-director-mysql 5.2.5-0ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: User Name 3.2.0-1409.12-omap4 3.2.9
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-1409-omap4 armv7l
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: armhf
Date: Tue Mar 20 17:05:52 2012
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=screen-bce
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LANGUAGE=en_US:
SourcePackage: bacula
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: bacula (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armhf precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960761

Title:
  Typo in template files for mysql  pgsql director packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/960761/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 960761] Re: Typo in template files for mysql pgsql director packages

2012-03-20 Thread Tobin Davis
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960761

Title:
  Typo in template files for mysql  pgsql director packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/960761/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 960761] Re: Typo in template files for mysql pgsql director packages

2012-03-20 Thread Tobin Davis
Patch to fix this bug.

** Patch added: bacula-960761.patch
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/960761/+attachment/2907157/+files/bacula-960761.patch

** Tags added: patch

** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960761

Title:
  Typo in template files for mysql  pgsql director packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/960761/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 651281] Re: Need alsa configuration files for Dove A0 SOC platform

2012-03-19 Thread Tobin Davis
Extremely low priority, and platform won't be supported after 12.04
release.  Won't fix.

** Changed in: linux-mvl-dove (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Won't Fix

** Changed in: alsa-lib (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651281

Title:
  Need alsa configuration files for Dove A0 SOC platform

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-lib/+bug/651281/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 570817] Re: Netbook-launcher-efl resets menu to favorites only after launching some apps.

2012-03-19 Thread Tobin Davis
** Changed in: netbook-launcher-efl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570817

Title:
  Netbook-launcher-efl resets menu to favorites only after launching
  some apps.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netbook-launcher-efl/+bug/570817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 556703] Re: Sound folder should be more approriately named to Sound Video

2012-03-19 Thread Tobin Davis
** Changed in: netbook-launcher-efl (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556703

Title:
  Sound folder should be more approriately named to Sound  Video

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netbook-launcher-efl/+bug/556703/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 164233] Re: [Upstream] [hardy] Opening pdf with smooth gradient in Evince displays striped

2012-03-19 Thread Tobin Davis
I retested this on a theory (see 164233.tar.gz).  Test1.pdf is from the
steps above, and produces a chunky result as described.  test2.pdf
however was created using the print to file method of creating pdf
files, which I believe is a completely different library, and it looks
right (at least on this system).

This leads me to believe that the issue is in
/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libpdffilterlo.so or
OpenOffice/LibreOffice.

** Attachment added: 164233.tar.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/164233/+attachment/2901065/+files/164233.tar.gz

** Also affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164233

Title:
  [Upstream] [hardy] Opening pdf with smooth gradient in Evince displays
  striped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/164233/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 164233] Re: [Upstream] [hardy] Opening pdf with smooth gradient in Evince displays striped

2012-03-19 Thread Tobin Davis
Oddly enough, acroread will read  display both versions (and all the
other attachments) just fine, so both evince and libreoffice are
problematic.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164233

Title:
  [Upstream] [hardy] Opening pdf with smooth gradient in Evince displays
  striped

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/164233/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 732581] Re: colormap distorted during package removal in oem-config-debconf on omap4 preinstalled headless images

2012-03-19 Thread Tobin Davis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 747229 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747229

** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu Natty)
   Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 747229
   weird color change during oem-config debconf package removal step in serial 
installs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732581

Title:
  colormap distorted during package removal in oem-config-debconf on
  omap4 preinstalled headless images

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/732581/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 806751] Re: Boot partition on SD is too small on omap/omap4

2012-03-19 Thread Tobin Davis
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix

** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu Oneiric)
 Assignee: Michael Casadevall (mcasadevall) = (unassigned)

** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: Won't Fix = Fix Released

** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806751

Title:
  Boot partition on SD is too small on omap/omap4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/806751/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 702119] Re: Clicking install omap4 addons fails to launch

2012-03-19 Thread Tobin Davis
** Changed in: jasper-initramfs (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702119

Title:
  Clicking install omap4 addons fails to launch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jasper-initramfs/+bug/702119/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 956824] Re: [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in gnome_rr_screen_get_dpms_mode()

2012-03-16 Thread Tobin Davis
** Tags added: armhf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956824

Title:
  [power]: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in
  gnome_rr_screen_get_dpms_mode()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/956824/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 707003] Re: Kernel panic when trying to offline CPU1

2012-03-14 Thread Tobin Davis
Since we only have one more SRU update for Maverick scheduled at this
point, I am marking this as won't fix.

** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Maverick)
   Status: In Progress = Won't Fix

** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu)
Milestone: maverick-updates = natty-updates

** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Natty)
Milestone: maverick-updates = natty-updates

** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Maverick)
Milestone: None = maverick-updates

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707003

Title:
  Kernel panic when trying to offline CPU1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ti-omap4/+bug/707003/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 747229] Re: weird color change during oem-config debconf package removal step in serial installs

2012-03-14 Thread Tobin Davis
Thought I had posted my test notes, guess not.

Here is what I have done so far:
Used a daily image from 
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-preinstalled.  Ran through entire 
config process.  Observed color change at oem-config-remove step.
Logged in and installed the necessary oem-config packages that get removed 
after configuring.
Manually ran oem-config-remove (shell wrapper step), observed correct colors 
during oem-config-remove process.

I then started looking through the code, but got lost very quickly
(shell wrapper for python wrapper for other wrappers).

The color change is somewhere between oem-config-debconf and oem-config-
remove steps.  Not sure where (someone that knows the code could
probably find it easily).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747229

Title:
  weird color change during oem-config debconf package removal step in
  serial installs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/747229/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 951043] Re: Port OOM changes into do_page_fault for arm

2012-03-14 Thread Tobin Davis
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Paolo Pisati (p-pisati)

** Changed in: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Paolo Pisati (p-pisati)

** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Bryan Wu (cooloney)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951043

Title:
  Port OOM changes into do_page_fault for arm

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/951043/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 939240] Re: [public] armadaxp kernel slow to umount

2012-03-14 Thread Tobin Davis
This appears to be fixed with the 3.2 kernel.  Marking as fix-committed.
Will change once the 3.2 kernel hits the pool.


** Changed in: linux-armadaxp (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939240

Title:
  [public] armadaxp kernel slow to umount

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/eilt/+bug/939240/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 950572] Re: linux-ti-omap4: 3.0.0-1208.18 -proposed tracker

2012-03-13 Thread Tobin Davis
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/regression-testing
   Status: New = Fix Released

** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/regression-testing
 Assignee: Ubuntu Armel Testers (ubuntu-armel-qa) = Tobin Davis 
(gruemaster)

** Tags added: qa-testing-passed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950572

Title:
  linux-ti-omap4: 3.0.0-1208.18 -proposed tracker

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/950572/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 838200] Re: No network support on Beagle XM

2012-03-12 Thread Tobin Davis
I fail to see any network test results in any of the comments in
lp:912199.I am working with community members to try to reproduce
this.   If it can't be reproduced in the community, then I will mark it
as Fix Released.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Precise)
   Status: Fix Released = Incomplete

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric)
   Status: Fix Released = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838200

Title:
  No network support on Beagle XM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/838200/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 948274] Re: linux-fsl-imx51: 2.6.31-612.34 -proposed tracker

2012-03-12 Thread Tobin Davis
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/regression-testing
   Status: Confirmed = In Progress

** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/regression-testing
 Assignee: Ubuntu Armel Testers (ubuntu-armel-qa) = Tobin Davis 
(gruemaster)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948274

Title:
  linux-fsl-imx51: 2.6.31-612.34 -proposed tracker

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/948274/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 948274] Re: linux-fsl-imx51: 2.6.31-612.34 -proposed tracker

2012-03-12 Thread Tobin Davis
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/regression-testing
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

** Tags added: qa-testing-passed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948274

Title:
  linux-fsl-imx51: 2.6.31-612.34 -proposed tracker

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/948274/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 947896] Re: linux-mvl-dove: 2.6.32-424.43 -proposed tracker

2012-03-12 Thread Tobin Davis
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/regression-testing
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/regression-testing
 Assignee: Ubuntu Armel Testers (ubuntu-armel-qa) = Tobin Davis 
(gruemaster)

** Tags added: qa-testing-passed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947896

Title:
  linux-mvl-dove: 2.6.32-424.43 -proposed tracker

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/947896/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 522858] Re: Sometimes app windows come up undecorated, unselectable, and not full screen

2012-03-09 Thread Tobin Davis
** Changed in: maximus (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix

** Changed in: maximus (Ubuntu)
Milestone: lucid-updates = None

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522858

Title:
  Sometimes app windows come up undecorated, unselectable, and not full
  screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/maximus/+bug/522858/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >