[Bug 1034072] [NEW] Missing symlink prevents playbin2 to find qtdemux

2012-08-07 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

When trying to play quicktime video, playbin2 fails:

vstehle@unb0919505:/work/cross/graphics-tests$ gst-launch-0.10 playbin2 
uri='http://mirrorblender.top-ix.org/peach/bigbuckbunny_movies/big_buck_bunny_480p_h264.mov'
Setting pipeline to PAUSED ...
Pipeline is PREROLLING ...
Missing element: Quicktime demuxer
WARNING: from element /GstPlayBin2:playbin20/GstURIDecodeBin:uridecodebin0: No 
decoder available for type 'video/quicktime'.
Additional debug info:
gsturidecodebin.c(874): unknown_type_cb (): 
/GstPlayBin2:playbin20/GstURIDecodeBin:uridecodebin0
ERROR: from element 
/GstPlayBin2:playbin20/GstURIDecodeBin:uridecodebin0/GstDecodeBin2:decodebin20: 
Your GStreamer installation is missing a plug-in.
Additional debug info:
gstdecodebin2.c(3576): gst_decode_bin_expose (): 
/GstPlayBin2:playbin20/GstURIDecodeBin:uridecodebin0/GstDecodeBin2:decodebin20:
no suitable plugins found
ERROR: pipeline doesn't want to preroll.
Setting pipeline to NULL ...
Freeing pipeline ...

If I create a symlink with:

root@unb0919505:~# ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
gnu/gstreamer-0.10/libgstisomp4.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
gnu/gstreamer-0.10/libgstqtdemux.so

...the same gst-launch pipeline then plays fine.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good 0.10.31-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-27.43-generic 3.2.21
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-27-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Aug  7 19:17:17 2012
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gst-plugins-good0.10
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gst-plugins-good0.10 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034072

Title:
  Missing symlink prevents playbin2 to find qtdemux

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-plugins-good0.10/+bug/1034072/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1034072] Re: Missing symlink prevents playbin2 to find qtdemux

2012-08-07 Thread Vincent Stehlé
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034072

Title:
  Missing symlink prevents playbin2 to find qtdemux

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-plugins-good0.10/+bug/1034072/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 983205] Re: Highest monitor resolution not detected

2012-04-19 Thread Vincent Stehlé
It works now.

If I use the attached xorg.conf I can see the 1600x1200 resolution in
Xorg.0.log. It is not autoselected by Xorg, though, but I can select
it manually with xrandr. (Modeline adapted from
http://wiki.x.org/wiki/FAQVideoModes#Setting_up_a_Dell_2001FP_LCD)


** Attachment added: Xorg.conf with modeline for 1600x1200
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/983205/+attachment/3092959/+files/xorg.conf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983205

Title:
  Highest monitor resolution not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/983205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 983205] [NEW] Highest monitor resolution not detected

2012-04-16 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Nouveau does not see the highest 1600x1200 resolution supported by my
monitor. It fallbacks to 1280x1024.

xrandr output (concerned monitor is DVI-I-1):

vstehle@unb0919505:~$ xrandr 
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2560 x 1024, maximum 4096 x 4096
DVI-I-1 connected 1280x1024+1280+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 
367mm x 275mm
   1280x1024  75.0*60.0  
   1152x864   75.0  
   1024x768   75.1 60.0  
   800x60075.0 60.3  
   640x48075.0 60.0  
   720x40070.1  
DVI-I-2 connected 1280x1024+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 
338mm x 270mm
   1280x1024  60.0*+   75.0  
   1152x864   75.0  
   1024x768   75.1 60.0  
   800x60075.0 60.3  
   640x48075.0 60.0  
   720x40070.1

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20111201+b5534a1-1build2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Apr 16 18:04:15 2012
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983205

Title:
  Highest monitor resolution not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/983205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 983205] Re: Highest monitor resolution not detected

2012-04-16 Thread Vincent Stehlé
** Attachment added: Xorg log
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983205/+attachment/3078157/+files/Xorg.0.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983205

Title:
  Highest monitor resolution not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/983205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 983205] Re: Highest monitor resolution not detected

2012-04-16 Thread Vincent Stehlé
** Attachment added: Monitor's EDID
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/983205/+attachment/3078159/+files/edid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983205

Title:
  Highest monitor resolution not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/983205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 983205] Re: Highest monitor resolution not detected

2012-04-16 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Decoding of EDID:

vstehle@unb0919505:~$ edid-decode  
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:01.0/:01:00.0/drm/card0/card0-DVI-I-1/edid 
Extracted contents:
header:  00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00
serial number:   10 ac 21 a0 4c 39 39 32 24 11
version: 01 03
basic params:80 29 1f 78 ee
chroma info: ee 91 a3 54 4c 99 26 0f 50 54
established: a5 4b 00
standard:81 80 a9 40 71 4f 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
descriptor 1:48 3f 40 30 62 b0 32 40 40 c0 13 00 6f 13 11 00 00 1e
descriptor 2:00 00 00 ff 00 4d 59 35 34 36 37 39 36 32 39 39 4c 0a
descriptor 3:00 00 00 fc 00 44 45 4c 4c 20 32 30 30 37 46 50 0a 20
descriptor 4:00 00 00 fd 00 38 4c 1e 53 11 00 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20
extensions:  00
checksum:a4

Manufacturer: DEL Model a021 Serial Number 842611020
Made week 36 of 2007
EDID version: 1.3
Digital display
Maximum image size: 41 cm x 31 cm
Gamma: 2.20
DPMS levels: Standby Suspend Off
Supported color formats: RGB 4:4:4, YCrCb 4:2:2
Default (sRGB) color space is primary color space
First detailed timing is preferred timing
Established timings supported:
  720x400@70Hz
  640x480@60Hz
  640x480@75Hz
  800x600@60Hz
  800x600@75Hz
  1024x768@60Hz
  1024x768@75Hz
  1280x1024@75Hz
Standard timings supported:
  1280x1024@60Hz
  1600x1200@60Hz
  1152x864@75Hz
Detailed mode: Clock 162.000 MHz, 367 mm x 275 mm
   1600 1664 1856 2160 hborder 0
   1200 1201 1204 1250 vborder 0
   +hsync +vsync
Serial number: MY546796299L
Monitor name: DELL 2007FP
 Monitor ranges: 56-76HZ vertical, 30-83kHz horizontal, max dotclock 170MHz
Checksum: 0xa4

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983205

Title:
  Highest monitor resolution not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/983205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 983205] Re: Highest monitor resolution not detected

2012-04-16 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Also, 1600x1200 was working with old proprietary driver (I don't
remember if it was from Oneiric or Natty, sorry).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983205

Title:
  Highest monitor resolution not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/983205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 983205] Re: Highest monitor resolution not detected

2012-04-16 Thread Vincent Stehlé
** Attachment added: Output of xdpyinfo
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/983205/+attachment/3078215/+files/xdpyinfo.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983205

Title:
  Highest monitor resolution not detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/+bug/983205/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 657732] Re: xaos has artefacts on first frame with -threads

2012-04-16 Thread Vincent Stehlé
This is still the case with precise (xaos 3.5+ds1-1ubuntu1 armhf).

** Tags added: armhf precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657732

Title:
  xaos has artefacts on first frame with -threads

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xaos/+bug/657732/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 591665] Re: Resize command changes width of vertical splits, not height

2012-04-16 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Still the case with precise (screen 4.0.3-14ubuntu8).

** Tags added: precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591665

Title:
  Resize command changes width of vertical splits, not height

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/screen/+bug/591665/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 956107] [NEW] libc6-dbg relies on reportbug, does not depend on it

2012-03-15 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Following terminal output captured while installing libc6-dbg (and other 
packages) on a target with Ubuntu core filesystem.
reportbug is not installed on the target

aptitude
sh: 1: reportbug: not found
Reporting a bug in libc6-dbg:
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 60207 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6-dev 2.15-0ubuntu3 (using 
.../libc6-dev_2.15-0ubuntu5_armhf.deb) ...
...
Setting up libc6-dbg (2.15-0ubuntu5) ...
Press return to continue.

I suspect the 'sh: 1:' line denotes an error in a script, which relies
on reportbug.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: libc6-dbg 2.15-0ubuntu5
Uname: Linux 3.3.0-rc7 armv7l
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: armhf
Date: Thu Mar 15 16:28:48 2012
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
SourcePackage: eglibc
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: eglibc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armhf precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956107

Title:
  libc6-dbg relies on reportbug, does not depend on it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/956107/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 956107] Re: libc6-dbg relies on reportbug, does not depend on it

2012-03-15 Thread Vincent Stehlé
This is with libc6-dbg version 2.15-0ubuntu5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956107

Title:
  libc6-dbg relies on reportbug, does not depend on it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/956107/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 956107] Re: libc6-dbg relies on reportbug, does not depend on it

2012-03-15 Thread Vincent Stehlé
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956107

Title:
  libc6-dbg relies on reportbug, does not depend on it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/956107/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 828869] [NEW] top memory usage grows after running a few days

2011-08-18 Thread Vincent Stehlé
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 743350 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743350

Public bug reported:

'top' memory usage grows after running a few days (virtual memory more
than 1G), biggest consumer on my PC, which made me notice.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: procps 1:3.2.8-10ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-server 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-server x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Aug 18 17:57:00 2011
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
SourcePackage: procps
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: procps (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828869

Title:
  top memory usage grows after running a few days

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/828869/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 828869] Re: top memory usage grows after running a few days

2011-08-18 Thread Vincent Stehlé
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 743350 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743350


** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 743350
   top appears to leak memory

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828869

Title:
  top memory usage grows after running a few days

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/828869/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 701889] [NEW] Sometimes compiz starts with no windows decorations

2011-01-12 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: compiz

Sometimes compiz starts with no windows decorations (see screenshot), sometimes 
the windows are decorated.
If I disable/enable decorations in the settings manager the decorations appear.
This was working with Maverick.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: compiz-plugins 1:0.9.2.1+glibmainloop3-0ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-12.26-generic-pae 2.6.37
Uname: Linux 2.6.37-12-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/allscreens/options/active_plugins'
Date: Wed Jan 12 06:48:31 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100816.1)
MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E6410
PciDisplay: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation GT218 
[NVS 3100M] [10de:0a6c] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.utf8
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.37-12-generic-pae 
root=UUID=69125399-a8cf-43c3-b5fd-d57d30c35929 ro quiet acpi_osi=!Windows 
2009 vt.handoff=7 quiet splash
RelatedPackageVersions:
 xserver-xorg 1:7.5+6ubuntu6
 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.0+git20101118.3dcc3153-0ubuntu1~bryce10~natty
 libdrm2 2.4.22+git20101203.af3d282a-0ubuntu0sarvatt
 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.901-2ubuntu2
 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.13.2-1ubuntu2
SourcePackage: compiz
dmi.bios.date: 08/10/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A05
dmi.board.name: 0K42JR
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A01
dmi.chassis.type: 9
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA05:bd08/10/2010:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE6410:pvr0001:rvnDellInc.:rn0K42JR:rvrA01:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr:
dmi.product.name: Latitude E6410
dmi.product.version: 0001
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
system: distro = Ubuntu, architecture = i686, kernel = 2.6.37-12-generic-pae

** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701889

Title:
  Sometimes compiz starts with no windows decorations

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 701889] Re: Sometimes compiz starts with no windows decorations

2011-01-12 Thread Vincent Stehlé

** Attachment added: Screenshot of non-decorated ccsm
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701889/+attachment/1791802/+files/Screenshot.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701889

Title:
  Sometimes compiz starts with no windows decorations

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 653002] Re: omapdss DISPC error: GFX_FIFO_UNDERFLOW, disabling GFX

2011-01-04 Thread Vincent Stehlé
I added maverick-proposed and tried linux-image-2.6.35-903-omap4 version
2.6.35-903.20 on a Panda. It works fine, I can run Unity on a 1080p
monitor with no issue (i.e. no black screen).

Note that the black screen can still be obtained on purpose with
'x11perf -copywinwin500' even under the recovery console, though. In
which case you need to do a CTRL-ALT-F1 / ALT-F8 switch to get the
display back.

V.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653002

Title:
  omapdss DISPC error: GFX_FIFO_UNDERFLOW, disabling GFX

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 694780] [NEW] %(xxx) are not properly substituted in prompt commands

2010-12-27 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: tig

%(xxx) are not properly substituted in prompt commands (and looking at
the code I think this is a bug).

To reproduce, run tig, select a commit and press ENTER, then start the
command prompt with ':' and run a git command such as e.g. 'rev-parse
%(commit)'. The resulting output shows the '%(commit)' not substituted,
while it would be nice if it could be substituted with the currently
selected ref.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: tig 0.16-2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-11.25-generic-pae 2.6.37-rc7
Uname: Linux 2.6.37-11-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: wl nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Dec 27 18:03:58 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100816.1)
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.utf8
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
SourcePackage: tig

** Affects: tig (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694780

Title:
  %(xxx) are not properly substituted in prompt commands

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 694780] Re: %(xxx) are not properly substituted in prompt commands

2010-12-27 Thread Vincent Stehlé


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694780

Title:
  %(xxx) are not properly substituted in prompt commands

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 694780] Re: %(xxx) are not properly substituted in prompt commands

2010-12-27 Thread Vincent Stehlé
The attached patch fixes this.

** Patch added: enable-subst-in-prompt-commands.patch
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tig/+bug/694780/+attachment/1777549/+files/enable-subst-in-prompt-commands.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694780

Title:
  %(xxx) are not properly substituted in prompt commands

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 692627] [NEW] Z-order artifacts in first rotating horse benchmark

2010-12-20 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: glmark2

glmark2-es2 exhibits z-order artefacts during its first benchmark (see
attached screenshots).

This is seen on a Dell laptop PC with gallium soft pipe GL ES.
This happens also on OMAP4 (armel platform) with accelerated drivers.

This does not happen with the Desktop GL version, glmark2.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: glmark2-es2 10.07.1-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-10.24-generic-pae 2.6.37-rc6
Uname: Linux 2.6.37-10-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: cisco_ipsec wl nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Dec 20 17:37:35 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100816.1)
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.utf8
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
SourcePackage: glmark2

** Affects: glmark2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armel i386 maverick natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692627

Title:
  Z-order artifacts in first rotating horse benchmark

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 692627] Re: Z-order artifacts in first rotating horse benchmark

2010-12-20 Thread Vincent Stehlé

** Attachment added: Screenshot-glmark2 10.07.1.png
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692627/+attachment/1771550/+files/Screenshot-glmark2%2010.07.1.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692627

Title:
  Z-order artifacts in first rotating horse benchmark

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 692627] Re: Z-order artifacts in first rotating horse benchmark

2010-12-20 Thread Vincent Stehlé

** Attachment added: Screenshot-glmark2 10.07.1-1.png
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glmark2/+bug/692627/+attachment/1771552/+files/Screenshot-glmark2%2010.07.1-1.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692627

Title:
  Z-order artifacts in first rotating horse benchmark

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs



[Bug 691173] [NEW] Valgrind complains on arm v7a

2010-12-16 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: valgrind

Valgrind complains on arm v7a; does not handled some instruction:

vinc...@vincent-panda:~$ valgrind ls
==1368== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==1368== Copyright (C) 2002-2010, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==1368== Using Valgrind-3.6.0.SVN-Debian and LibVEX; rerun with -h for 
copyright info
==1368== Command: ls
==1368== 
disInstr(arm): unhandled instruction: 0xDFA068F8
 cond=13(0xD) 27:20=250(0xFA) 4:4=1 3:0=8(0x8)

vex: priv/guest_arm_toIR.c:4773 (disInstr_ARM_WRK): Assertion `0 == 
(guest_R15_curr_instr  3)' failed.
vex storage: T total 0 bytes allocated
vex storage: P total 0 bytes allocated

valgrind: the 'impossible' happened:
   LibVEX called failure_exit().
==1368==at 0x3802D0A0: report_and_quit (m_libcassert.c:191)
==1368==by 0xE28D000B: ???

sched status:
  running_tid=1

Thread 1: status = VgTs_Runnable
==1368==at 0x40007E1: ??? (in /lib/ld-2.12.1.so)


Note: see also the FAQ in the source distribution.
It contains workarounds to several common problems.
In particular, if Valgrind aborted or crashed after
identifying problems in your program, there's a good chance
that fixing those problems will prevent Valgrind aborting or
crashing, especially if it happened in m_mallocfree.c.

If that doesn't help, please report this bug to: www.valgrind.org

In the bug report, send all the above text, the valgrind
version, and what OS and version you are using.  Thanks.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: valgrind 1:3.6.0~svn20100724-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-980.1release7-omap4 2.6.35.3
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-980-omap4 armv7l
Architecture: armel
Date: Thu Dec 16 17:36:17 2010
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: valgrind

** Affects: valgrind (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armel maverick ubuntu-une

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691173

Title:
  Valgrind complains on arm v7a

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 691173] Re: Valgrind complains on arm v7a

2010-12-16 Thread Vincent Stehlé


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691173

Title:
  Valgrind complains on arm v7a

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 691173] Re: Valgrind complains on arm v7a

2010-12-16 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Thanks!
It works indeed fine with valgrind 1:3.6.0-0ubuntu1 from natty.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691173

Title:
  Valgrind complains on arm v7a

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 651576] Re: cpuburn now has Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9 versions, please build for armv7a

2010-11-30 Thread Vincent Stehlé
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681267 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681267

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681267
   Packages for armel are missing
 * You can subscribe to bug 681267 by following this link: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpuburn/+bug/681267/+subscribe

-- 
cpuburn now has Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9 versions, please build for armv7a
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651576
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 653002] Re: omapdss DISPC error: GFX_FIFO_UNDERFLOW, disabling GFX

2010-11-12 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Ricardo, I confirm that I have no black screen in 1080p after a few
hours. This is using your 18rsalveti2 .deb files.

Thanks!

V.

-- 
omapdss DISPC error: GFX_FIFO_UNDERFLOW, disabling GFX
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 666267] Re: Cross compiled headers package breaks DKMS compilation

2010-11-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Hi Bryan,

Removing the binaries is not sufficient, I am affraid. DKMS build fails,
and I have in make.log:

  /bin/sh: scripts/basic/fixdep: not found

Best regards,

V.

-- 
Cross compiled headers package breaks DKMS compilation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 666267] Re: Cross compiled headers package breaks DKMS compilation

2010-11-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
A precision: I removed the binaries manually under /usr/src/linux-
headers-xxx.

-- 
Cross compiled headers package breaks DKMS compilation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 666267] [NEW] Cross compiled headers package breaks DKMS compilation

2010-10-25 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

When cross-compiling headers package on a PC, some x86 programs get shipped in 
the .deb.
Those programs get called during later compilation of DKMS modules, breaking 
the build.

Faulty binaries are:

  scripts/mod/mk_elfconfig
  scripts/mod/modpost
  scripts/kconfig/conf
  scripts/basic/hash
  scripts/basic/docproc
  scripts/basic/fixdep
  scripts/bin2c
  scripts/kallsyms
  scripts/pnmtologo
  scripts/conmakehash
  scripts/selinux/genheaders/genheaders
  scripts/selinux/mdp/mdp

Starting with, for example:

  
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/linux-ti-omap4_2.6.35.orig.tar.gz
  
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/linux-ti-omap4_2.6.35-903.16.diff.gz
  
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/linux-ti-omap4_2.6.35-903.16.dsc

Extract with 'dpkg-source -x linux-ti-omap4_2.6.35-903.16.dsc'.
Cross compilation is done with:

  fakeroot debian/rules clean
  export $(dpkg-architecture -aarmel)
  CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- skipabi=true skipmodule=true fakeroot 
debian/rules binary-omap4

To obtain cross compilers, add the following line to your
'/etc/apt/sources.list':

  deb http://people.canonical.com/~hrw/ubuntu-maverick-armel-cross-
compilers/ ./

Then install 'gcc-4.4-arm-linux-gnueabi'.
After cross build, the resulting .deb are:

  linux-headers-2.6.35-903-omap4_2.6.35-903.16_armel.deb
  linux-image-2.6.35-903-omap4_2.6.35-903.16_armel.deb

One can check the shipped x86 binaries by extracting the .deb:

  dpkg -x linux-headers-2.6.35-903-omap4_2.6.35-903.16_armel.deb extract

...and searching for x86 executables:

  find extract/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.35-903-omap4/scripts -type f
-exec file {} \; |grep ELF |grep x86 |sed 's,:.*,,'

Some more details on cross compiling can be found at
'http://idlethread.blogspot.com/2009/01/recipe-of-day-cross-compiling-
armel.html'.

** Affects: linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: armel maverick

-- 
Cross compiled headers package breaks DKMS compilation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666267
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 646368] Re: smsc911x has no module alias, does not get auto-loaded on OMAP3 EVM

2010-10-16 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Attached patch 0001-smsc911x-Add-MODULE_ALIAS.patch got merged at commit
62038e4a146b97352d5911e6ede36c58d4187c3e in linux-2.6.git.

-- 
smsc911x has no module alias, does not get auto-loaded on OMAP3 EVM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646368
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661003] [NEW] Debconf dialogs are hidden

2010-10-15 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: software-center

Using the software center on an OMAP4 Panda, installing TI OMAP extras
with the desktop icon just after installing the preinstalled maverick
image, debconf dialogs are hidden. For example, license agreements
windows asking the user to confirm.

If the user does not notice the window in the top bar, it seems as if
the installation of the packages is stalled (but this is not the
case).

I wonder if this is due to 'maximus' or something related...

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: software-center 3.0.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-903.14-omap4 2.6.35.3
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-903-omap4 armv7l
Architecture: armel
Date: Fri Oct  8 12:42:47 2010
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: software-center

** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armel maverick ubuntu-une

-- 
Debconf dialogs are hidden
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661003
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661003] Re: Debconf dialogs are hidden

2010-10-15 Thread Vincent Stehlé


-- 
Debconf dialogs are hidden
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661003
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 660410] Re: Sizes of packages downloaded from a private PPA are wrong

2010-10-15 Thread Vincent Stehlé
When packages are in a public PPA, sizes are correct.

-- 
Sizes of packages downloaded from a private PPA are wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 660410] Re: Sizes of packages downloaded from a private PPA are wrong

2010-10-15 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Actually, to refine a bit previous statement:

- When the packages are in a public PPA, before clicking on install, the 
sizes are correct.
- After clicking on install, during actual installation of the packages (orange 
progress bar shown) the sizes are wrong again.

-- 
Sizes of packages downloaded from a private PPA are wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 660410] [NEW] Sizes of packages downloaded from a private PPA are wrong

2010-10-14 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: software-center

When downloading packages from TI PPA + developers private PPA, sizes
reported by the software centre are exaggerated (see screenshot).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: software-center 3.0.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-903.14-omap4 2.6.35.3
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-903-omap4 armv7l
Architecture: armel
Date: Thu Oct  7 22:50:42 2010
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: software-center

** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armel maverick ubuntu-une

-- 
Sizes of packages downloaded from a private PPA are wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 660410] Re: Sizes of packages downloaded from a private PPA are wrong

2010-10-14 Thread Vincent Stehlé

** Attachment added: Screenshot
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660410/+attachment/1692227/+files/Screenshot-ppa.png

-- 
Sizes of packages downloaded from a private PPA are wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 660410] Re: Sizes of packages downloaded from a private PPA are wrong

2010-10-14 Thread Vincent Stehlé
After installation has completed, the sizes are displayed correctly (see
screenshot).

** Attachment added: Screenshot after install has completed
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/660410/+attachment/1692250/+files/Screenshot-soft-center-2.png

-- 
Sizes of packages downloaded from a private PPA are wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 659754] [NEW] Universe multiverse are not enabled on OMAP4 preinstalled image

2010-10-13 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

After installing the preinstalled maverick image for OMAP4, universe 
multiverse are not enabled in the sources.list.

This makes installing ubuntu-omap4-extras a bit more difficult due to
dependencies on multiverse/universe packages (e.g. faac, gstreamer...)

** Affects: jasper-initramfs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: armel maverick

-- 
Universe  multiverse are not enabled on OMAP4 preinstalled image
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659754
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 646368] Re: smsc911x has no module alias, does not get auto-loaded on OMAP3 EVM

2010-10-13 Thread Vincent Stehlé
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = In Progress

-- 
smsc911x has no module alias, does not get auto-loaded on OMAP3 EVM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646368
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 657706] [NEW] System tab contents not nice on vertical displays

2010-10-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: metacity

Using maverick preinstalled image of 9-Oct-2010 on an OMAP3 omap3evm
(which has a vertical display), the System tab is not displayed
correctly (icons overlap).

Screenshot attached.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: metacity 1:2.30.2-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-omap 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-omap armv7l
Architecture: armel
Date: Sun Oct 10 16:04:39 2010
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: metacity

** Affects: metacity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armel maverick ubuntu-une

-- 
System tab contents not nice on vertical displays
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 657706] Re: System tab contents not nice on vertical displays

2010-10-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé

** Attachment added: Screenshot
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657706/+attachment/1681768/+files/Screenshot.png

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657706/+attachment/1681769/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
System tab contents not nice on vertical displays
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 657732] [NEW] xaos has artefacts on first frame with -threads

2010-10-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xaos

Running xaos on an omap3evm, the first frame has strange artefacts when
xaos is run with '-threads 2' (see attached screenshot).

The same was seen on an OMAP4 panda and a Toshiba ac100.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: xaos 3.5+ds1-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-omap 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-omap armv7l
Architecture: armel
Date: Sun Oct 10 16:36:43 2010
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: xaos

** Affects: xaos (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armel maverick ubuntu-une

-- 
xaos has artefacts on first frame with -threads
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657732
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 657732] Re: xaos has artefacts on first frame with -threads

2010-10-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé

** Attachment added: Screenshot of first frame
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657732/+attachment/1681936/+files/Screenshot-xaos.png

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657732/+attachment/1681937/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
xaos has artefacts on first frame with -threads
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657732
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 646368] Re: smsc911x has no module alias, does not get auto-loaded on OMAP3 EVM

2010-10-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
The module is now auto-loaded ok on my omap3evm with the .deb of Ricardo.
(2.6.35-22-omap #34 Fri Oct 1 03:25:47 BRT 2010 armv7l GNU/Linux)

-- 
smsc911x has no module alias, does not get auto-loaded on OMAP3 EVM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646368
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 651576] [NEW] cpuburn now has Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9 versions, please build for armv7a

2010-09-29 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: cpuburn

Upstream cpuburn now has Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9 versions.
Please build this package for armv7a too.

** Affects: cpuburn (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: armel

-- 
cpuburn now has Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9 versions, please build for armv7a
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651576
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 646368] [NEW] smsc911x has no module alias, does not get auto-loaded on OMAP3 EVM

2010-09-23 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

OMAP3 EVM with kernel 2.6.35-22-omap #33-Ubuntu has a platform device 
'platform:smsc911x'.
For some reason, there is no module alias generated in modules.alias like: 
'alias platform:smsc911x smsc911x'.
This results in the module smsc911x not being loaded automatically.
The ethernet interface is then not available under e.g. ifconfig -a

If the module is manually modprobe'd, the ethernet is working fine.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: armel maverick

-- 
smsc911x has no module alias, does not get auto-loaded on OMAP3 EVM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646368
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 646368] Re: smsc911x has no module alias, does not get auto-loaded on OMAP3 EVM

2010-09-23 Thread Vincent Stehlé
The MODULE_ALIAS is missing in drivers/net/smsc911x.c
The following patch fixes the problem.
Please apply and push upstream too, as I did not find it in any git tree.


** Patch added: Add MODULE_ALIAS to smsc911x
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/646368/+attachment/1629151/+files/0001-smsc911x-Add-MODULE_ALIAS.patch

-- 
smsc911x has no module alias, does not get auto-loaded on OMAP3 EVM
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646368
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 645404] [NEW] add-apt-repository incorrect sources with private-ppa

2010-09-22 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

add-apt-repository generates incorrect sources list with private-ppa.

---
r...@vincent-desktop:~# add-apt-repository ppa:tiomap-dev/private-release
Error: can't find signing_key_fingerprint at 
https://launchpad.net/api/1.0/~tiomap-dev/+archive/private-release
r...@vincent-desktop:~# cat 
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/tiomap-dev-private-release-maverick.list 
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/tiomap-dev/private-release/ubuntu maverick main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/tiomap-dev/private-release/ubuntu maverick main
---

Those sources do not allow apt to work correctly.
The correct lines, mentioned on launchpad web page are:

---
This PPA can be added to your system manually by copying the lines below and 
adding them to your system's software sources.
deb https://private-ppa.launchpad.net/tiomap-dev/private-release/ubuntu 
maverick main 
deb-src https://private-ppa.launchpad.net/tiomap-dev/private-release/ubuntu 
maverick main
---

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: python-software-properties 0.76.7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-903.12-omap4 2.6.35.3
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-903-omap4 armv7l
Architecture: armel
Date: Wed Sep 22 19:20:16 2010
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: software-properties

** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armel maverick ubuntu-une

-- 
add-apt-repository incorrect sources with private-ppa
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645404
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 645404] Re: add-apt-repository incorrect sources with private-ppa

2010-09-22 Thread Vincent Stehlé

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645404/+attachment/1623511/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
add-apt-repository incorrect sources with private-ppa
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645404
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 645404] Re: add-apt-repository incorrect sources with private-ppa

2010-09-22 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Also, invoking with private-ppa gives an error:

r...@vincent-desktop:~# add-apt-repository 
private-ppa:tiomap-dev/private-release
Error: 'private-ppa:tiomap-dev/private-release' invalid

-- 
add-apt-repository incorrect sources with private-ppa
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645404
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630885] Re: Preinstalled Maverick netbook image has no display on omap3 EVM (no LCD)

2010-09-22 Thread Vincent Stehlé
I confirm it works with daily image of 23-Sep.
I can see the console messages of filesystem check, resize, swap creation... 
nice :)

-- 
Preinstalled Maverick netbook image has no display on omap3 EVM (no LCD)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630885
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 639796] [NEW] ltrace complains about unexpected instruction

2010-09-15 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ltrace

On an ARM Cortex-A9, ltrace complains about unexpected instruction.
For example:

$ ltrace ls
...
fclose(0x402785d8 unfinished ...
unexpected instruction 0xdf004667 at 0x40196892
unexpected instruction 0xdf004667 at 0x40196892
SYS_munmap(0x4006e000, 4096)
= 0
... fclose resumed )  
= 0
__fpending(0x40278678, 0, 0x40278538, 135880, 0)
= 0
fclose(0x40278678 unfinished ...
unexpected instruction 0xdf004667 at 0x40196892
unexpected instruction 0xdf004667 at 0x40196892
... fclose resumed )  
= 0
unexpected instruction 0xdf004667 at 0x40196892
+++ exited (status 0) +++

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: ltrace 0.5.3-2ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-ti903.8+ti+release2-omap4 2.6.35.3
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-ti903-omap4 armv7l
Architecture: armel
Date: Tue Sep 14 06:21:08 2010
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ltrace

** Affects: ltrace (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug armel maverick ubuntu-une

-- 
ltrace complains about unexpected instruction
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 639796] Re: ltrace complains about unexpected instruction

2010-09-15 Thread Vincent Stehlé

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639796/+attachment/1589749/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
ltrace complains about unexpected instruction
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 639796] Re: ltrace complains about unexpected instruction

2010-09-15 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Looking at the ARMv7a spec, the two instructions 0xdf004667 look like
the following two 16b thumb instructions:

0xdf00   SVC #0
0x4667  MOV R7, R12

-- 
ltrace complains about unexpected instruction
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 634870] Re: dconf-service crashed with signal 5

2010-09-15 Thread Vincent Stehlé
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
dconf-service crashed with signal 5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634870
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630885] Re: Preinstalled Maverick netbook image has no display on omap3 EVM (no LCD)

2010-09-15 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Thanks, it works (console displayed on LCD).

Mathieu, t'es une estie d'bon gars ! :)

-- 
Preinstalled Maverick netbook image has no display on omap3 EVM (no LCD)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630885
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630825] Re: Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo

2010-09-13 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Yes, I am afraid the bug is also present for linux-image-2.6.35-1005
-linaro-omap_2.6.35-1005.10_armel.deb (see the UART log).

** Attachment added: UART log of boot with linux-image-2.6.35-1005-linaro-omap
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/630825/+attachment/1579855/+files/screenlog

-- 
Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630825
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630885] Re: Preinstalled Maverick netbook image has no display on omap3 EVM (no LCD)

2010-09-13 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Mathieu, thanks for your concern!

FYI: My board is an OMAP3 EVM rev. D (See
http://www.mistralsolutions.com/products/omap_3evm.php).

I gave a try at your kernel, and I am sorry to report this is not
working. Here is the UART log in attachment; you'll notice:

[8.257751] omapdss SDI error: can't get VDDS_SDI regulator
[8.257781] omapdss CORE error: Failed to initialize SDI

I think you need an additional patch (like mine in #6) to enable
VDDS_SDI. Looking with 'git log', I did not find any in some kernel
trees I track, which makes me think it might need to go upstream as
well.

** Attachment added: UART log of boot, VDDS_SDI missing.
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/630885/+attachment/1579975/+files/screenlog.2

-- 
Preinstalled Maverick netbook image has no display on omap3 EVM (no LCD)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630885
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630825] Re: Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo

2010-09-11 Thread Vincent Stehlé
FWIW: Recompiling the kernel with CONFIG_PM disabled makes the issue
disappear.

-- 
Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630825
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630825] Re: Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo

2010-09-11 Thread Vincent Stehlé
I did a 'git bisect' between Ubuntu-2.6.34-3.10 (good) and
Ubuntu-2.6.35-1.1 (bad):

40742fa82ebf53c9367f5807cf1012d518516e74 is first bad commit
commit 40742fa82ebf53c9367f5807cf1012d518516e74
Author: Mike Chan m...@android.com
Date:   Mon May 3 16:04:06 2010 -0700

OMAP3: PM: Enable IO / IO-CHAIN wakeups for PER

IO events can also come from GPIO modules, which reside in the PER domain.
It is possible for the PER to enter RET while CORE is still in ON.
If GPIO 2-6 are enabled for IO-pad wakeups, the PER domain will not
wakeup in this case, unless we enable it.

Signed-off-by: Mike Chan m...@android.com
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com

:04 04 270b6d5d07c566d7ff1fe6a2d22f7eab3dbf7159
1863e212b840b133e37691c40d3fddabf0f0444e M  arch

-- 
Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630825
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630825] Re: Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo

2010-09-11 Thread Vincent Stehlé
This patch can be applied on top of Ubuntu-2.6.35-19.28 to revert
40742fa82ebf53c9367f5807cf1012d518516e74 and see that the daisy chain
issue goes away.

(Note that it is probably not a definitive solution, just a debug help.)

** Patch added: Revert 40742fa82ebf53c9367f5807cf1012d518516e74 from 
Ubuntu-2.6.35-19.28
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/630825/+attachment/1570988/+files/revert-40742fa82ebf53c9367f5807cf1012d518516e74.patch

-- 
Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630825
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630885] Re: Preinstalled Maverick netbook image has no display on omap3 EVM (no LCD)

2010-09-11 Thread Vincent Stehlé
I find this bug similar to bug 597904.

-- 
Preinstalled Maverick netbook image has no display on omap3 EVM (no LCD)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630885
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630885] Re: Preinstalled Maverick netbook image has no display on omap3 EVM (no LCD)

2010-09-11 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Using the patch from Pawel Moll (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-
omap/msg34327.html) on top of Ubuntu-2.6.35-19.28, plus the small patch
attached to enable vdds_sdi, the LCDis functional.

** Patch added: Add VDDS_SDI to omap3evm
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/630885/+attachment/1571674/+files/add-sdi.patch

-- 
Preinstalled Maverick netbook image has no display on omap3 EVM (no LCD)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630885
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630885] Re: Preinstalled Maverick netbook image has no display on omap3 EVM (no LCD)

2010-09-11 Thread Vincent Stehlé
(Attaching the .config also.)

** Attachment added: Kernel config
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/630885/+attachment/1571700/+files/.config

-- 
Preinstalled Maverick netbook image has no display on omap3 EVM (no LCD)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630885
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 634799] [NEW] Black screen with preinstalled Maverick netbook image on omap4

2010-09-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

I get a black screen after booting Maverick preinstalled netbook image on omap4 
Panda board (ES2.0).
This is using the daily images of 9-Sep-2010 or 10-Sep-2010.
UART boot log attached.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: armel maverick

-- 
Black screen with preinstalled Maverick netbook image on omap4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634799
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 634799] Re: Black screen with preinstalled Maverick netbook image on omap4

2010-09-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé

** Attachment added: UART boot log
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634799/+attachment/1565123/+files/screenlog

-- 
Black screen with preinstalled Maverick netbook image on omap4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634799
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 634799] Re: Black screen with preinstalled Maverick netbook image on omap4

2010-09-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
To detail a bit more:
- This is with a Dell LCD monitor plugged on HDMI output.
- With the console= options I have the same traces on LCD  on UART. Then after 
the last message the screen goes black.

-- 
Black screen with preinstalled Maverick netbook image on omap4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634799
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 634799] Re: Black screen with preinstalled Maverick netbook image on omap4

2010-09-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Solved: LCD cable was half plugged, which made the low res text-mode
work but the high res desktop go black.

Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Black screen with preinstalled Maverick netbook image on omap4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634799
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 634888] Re: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()

2010-09-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 634855 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634855

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634888
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 634884] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()

2010-09-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 634855 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634855

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634884
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 634882] Re: seahorse crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()

2010-09-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 634855 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634855

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
seahorse crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634882
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 634881] Re: alacarte crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()

2010-09-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 634855 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634855

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
alacarte crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634881
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 634877] Re: palimpsest crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()

2010-09-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 634855 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634855

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
palimpsest crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634877
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 634855] Re: eog crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()

2010-09-10 Thread Vincent Stehlé
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
eog crashed with SIGSEGV in strcmp()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634855
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630825] Re: Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo

2010-09-08 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Same behavior with daily image (http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-
netbook/ports/daily-preinstalled/current/maverick-preinstalled-netbook-
armel+omap.img.gz).

-- 
Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630825
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630825] Re: Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo

2010-09-05 Thread Vincent Stehlé
The Wake up daisy chain activation failed. messages look like kernel messages 
to me.
Are you sure u-boot-omap3 is the right package?

-- 
Preinstalled Maverick netbook image won't boot on Gumstix Overo
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630825
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626749] [NEW] Generation of initramfs fails on OMAP4 when no 'Kernel' mtd partition exists, preventing configure/install.

2010-08-30 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: initramfs-tools

On OMAP4 (armel, v7a) board with no mtd partitions, initramfs-tools
complain with  Cannot find mtd partition 'Kernel' , which prevents
further configure/install, leaving the package half-configured.

Complete aptitude installation log:

Setting up initramfs-tools (0.98ubuntu2) ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.34-ti902-omap4
Cannot find mtd partition 'Kernel'
dpkg: error processing initramfs-tools (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 initramfs-tools
Press return to continue.

** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: armel

-- 
Generation of initramfs fails on OMAP4 when no 'Kernel' mtd partition exists, 
preventing configure/install.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626749
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626749] Re: Generation of initramfs fails on OMAP4 when no 'Kernel' mtd partition exists, preventing configure/install.

2010-08-30 Thread Vincent Stehlé

** Attachment added: Apport collected data.
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626749/+attachment/1529300/+files/apport.initramfs-tools._H415w.apport

-- 
Generation of initramfs fails on OMAP4 when no 'Kernel' mtd partition exists, 
preventing configure/install.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626749
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626749] Re: Generation of initramfs fails on OMAP4 when no 'Kernel' mtd partition exists, preventing configure/install.

2010-08-30 Thread Vincent Stehlé
** Tags added: maverick

-- 
Generation of initramfs fails on OMAP4 when no 'Kernel' mtd partition exists, 
preventing configure/install.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626749
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626749] Re: Generation of initramfs fails on OMAP4 when no 'Kernel' mtd partition exists, preventing configure/install.

2010-08-30 Thread Vincent Stehlé
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 615773 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615773

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 615773
   flash-kernel fails to handle raw boot partitons on eMMC

-- 
Generation of initramfs fails on OMAP4 when no 'Kernel' mtd partition exists, 
preventing configure/install.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626749
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626749] Re: Generation of initramfs fails on OMAP4 when no 'Kernel' mtd partition exists, preventing configure/install.

2010-08-30 Thread Vincent Stehlé
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 615773 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615773

I have no /etc/flash-kernel.conf; this is a home-made install, not done
by jasper.

-- 
Generation of initramfs fails on OMAP4 when no 'Kernel' mtd partition exists, 
preventing configure/install.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626749
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607752] [NEW] devmem2 needs packaging

2010-07-20 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

There is no Ubuntu package for devmem2.
Could someone please package it?

devmem2 is a tool to read physical memory through /dev/mem
This is useful for low level debugging on embedded targets.
Sources can be found at e.g. http://sources.buildroot.net/devmem2.c

Thanks!

V.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: needs-packaging

-- 
devmem2 needs packaging
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607752
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 604607] [NEW] Beagle won't start; System.Net.Sockets.SocketException

2010-07-12 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: beagle

Just after installing with aptitude:

$ beagle-search

Unhandled Exception: System.Net.Sockets.SocketException: Cannot find the 
specified file
  at Beagle.UnixTransport..ctor (System.String client_name) [0x0] 
  at Beagle.UnixTransport..ctor () [0x0] 
  at Beagle.RequestMessage..ctor (Boolean keepalive) [0x0] 
  at Beagle.InformationalMessagesRequest..ctor () [0x0] 
  at Beagle.Search.SearchWindow.StartCheckingIndexingStatus () [0x0] 
  at Beagle.Search.SearchWindow..ctor (ISearch search) [0x0] 
  at Beagle.Search.Search.Query (System.String query_text) [0x0] 
  at Beagle.Search.Driver.Main (System.String[] args) [0x0]

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: beagle 0.3.9-3ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-server 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-server x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Jul 12 14:39:11 2010
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: beagle

** Affects: beagle (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
Beagle won't start; System.Net.Sockets.SocketException
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604607
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 604607] Re: Beagle won't start; System.Net.Sockets.SocketException

2010-07-12 Thread Vincent Stehlé

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51780884/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Beagle won't start; System.Net.Sockets.SocketException
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604607
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 599862] [NEW] gnupg-agent won't start

2010-06-29 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnupg2

I cannot launch gnupg-agent on my platform:

$ gpg-agent --daemon
*** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: gpg-agent terminated
Aborted

This is on an armel maverick system.

More information:

$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu maverick (development branch)
Release:10.10

$ apt-cache policy gnupg2
gnupg2:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 2.0.14-1.1ubuntu1
  Version table:
 2.0.14-1.1ubuntu1 0
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ maverick/main Packages

** Affects: gnupg2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
gnupg-agent won't start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 599862] Re: gnupg-agent won't start

2010-06-29 Thread Vincent Stehlé
** Tags added: armel maverick

-- 
gnupg-agent won't start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599862
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 597218] Re: debuild option --prepend-path does not work

2010-06-29 Thread Vincent Stehlé
** Tags added: karmic

** Tags added: maverick
** Tags removed: karmic

-- 
debuild option --prepend-path does not work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 597218] [NEW] debuild option --prepend-path does not work

2010-06-22 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: devscripts

debuild option --prepend-path does not work even though the manpage
mentions it. This prevents, for example, ccache use.

Note: this is on armel.

---shell log---
$ debuild -uc -us --prepend-path /tmp/ccache-bin
debuild: unknown dpkg-buildpackage/debuild option: --prepend-path
debuild: unknown dpkg-buildpackage/debuild option: /tmp/ccache-bin
 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc --prepend-path /tmp/ccache-bin
dpkg-buildpackage: unknown option or argument --prepend-path


Usage: dpkg-buildpackage [options ...]
...
---/shell log---

$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu maverick (development branch)
Release:10.10

$ apt-cache policy devscripts
devscripts:
  Installed: 2.10.62ubuntu2
  Candidate: 2.10.62ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 2.10.62ubuntu2 0
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/ maverick/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

More versions:
dpkg-dev  1.15.7.2ubuntu1

** Affects: devscripts (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: armel

-- 
debuild option --prepend-path does not work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 591665] [NEW] Resize command changes width of vertical splits, not height

2010-06-09 Thread Vincent Stehlé
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: screen

The 'resize' command changes the width of vertical splits, not the
height.

The 'resize' command is documented in the manpage as always changing the
height, and there is no mention of a command for changing the width, so
this is an unexpected behavior.

Reproduction instructions:

1) Invoke screen
2) Create a horizontal split (ctrl-a S)
3) Create a vertical split (ctrl-a |)
4) Resize the vertical split (ctrl a : resize +3)

V.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: screen 4.0.3-14ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-server 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-server x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Jun  9 12:14:58 2010
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: screen

** Affects: screen (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
Resize command changes width of vertical splits, not height
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591665
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 591665] Re: Resize command changes width of vertical splits, not height

2010-06-09 Thread Vincent Stehlé

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50002705/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Resize command changes width of vertical splits, not height
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591665
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs