[Bug 910296] Re: Please backport the upstream patch to prevent attacks based on hash collisions

2012-01-14 Thread Ted Reed
Initial testing shows a crash from the error message there. A version
with the error message pulled out seems to be functioning.

There may be additional code from 2.3.9 that the Ubuntu version doesn't
have and needs to support the error message.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910296

Title:
  Please backport the upstream patch to prevent attacks based on hash
  collisions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/910296/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 916489] [NEW] grub-ipxe says B: command not found

2012-01-14 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
Public bug reported:

First of all thanks a lot for the ipxe package, it's most helpful. :)

I just tried grub-ipxe 1.0.0+git-2.149b50-1ubuntu4 in kubuntu precise, and it 
installed fine. But after selecting it in grub, and after the usual iPXE 
headers, I got:
B: command not found

At that point control was given back to the BIOS, and the next boot
device was chosen.

I suppose a broken iPXE script was linked in?

Also, could you please pull the latest iPXE from trunk, as it's more
stable, and it supports custom scripts as initrds?

** Affects: ipxe (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipxe in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916489

Title:
  grub-ipxe says B: command not found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipxe/+bug/916489/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 916494] [NEW] Please put ipxe.krn to the desktop CD

2012-01-14 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
Public bug reported:

Please put ipxe.lkrn as a boot option in the isolinux menu of the live
CDs, so that they can be used to netboot computers, either for network-
based installation, or as LTSP clients, etc.

The embedded iPXE script would do this:
1) autoboot (that's an iPXE command)
2) on failure, if no boot server exists on the local network, use 
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/netboot/ to download the kernel via http and to start 
a network installation without downloading or burning mini.iso.

It will only add a few Kb on the .iso, and it will make possible e.g. to
reuse the 12.04 CDs to netboot and install 14.04.

I can write the iPXE boot script if there's interest in it.

** Affects: ipxe (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipxe in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916494

Title:
  Please put ipxe.krn to the desktop CD

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipxe/+bug/916494/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 615545] Re: Instances launched in a VPC cannot access ec2.archive.ubuntu.com

2012-01-14 Thread cloudcontrol
Agree with Eric- this will be less expensive in the long run, though
potential to use CDN for the mirror is intriguing.

One last point in support of CNAMEs- in case there is unease with
relying on the CNAME solution (as Canonical does not control routing in
EC2), rest assured that this method is supported and recommended by EC2
engineering team and is used by virtually every large deployment on EC2.

One additional benefit is that, with a low time-to-live value, you can
easily replace a troubled repo server with a simple ec2-associate-
elastic-ip command.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615545

Title:
  Instances launched in a VPC cannot access ec2.archive.ubuntu.com

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/615545/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 916489] Re: grub-ipxe says B: command not found

2012-01-14 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
I installed it into a vbox client so I was able to get a screenshot of
the B: command not found problem.

I talked with the devs in #ipxe about it, they say the problem was
related to the grub command line handling, and was fixed in
https://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commit/8a86a848dc324221c39efd5853846e52a70046ed

Indeed, I tried loading the broken ipxe.lkrn from pxelinux, and it
loaded just fine.


So please just make another snapshot of the package with the latest source from 
iPXE git, that should fix the problem.

** Attachment added: ipxe.png
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipxe/+bug/916489/+attachment/2674715/+files/ipxe.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipxe in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916489

Title:
  grub-ipxe says B: command not found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipxe/+bug/916489/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 914920] Re: Please merge ipmitool 1.8.11-5 (universe) from Debian testing

2012-01-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package ipmitool - 1.8.11-5ubuntu1

---
ipmitool (1.8.11-5ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low

  * Merge from Debian testing (LP: #914920).  Remaining changes:
- debian/contol:
  + Changed openipmi from Suggests to Recommends
- debian/copyright:
  + Add DELL copyright notice.
- Apply a series of 6 patches from upstream's patch tracker to
  add DELL specific commands (delloem)
  * Drop changes:
- Add armel/armhf support, now Architecture is any
- 101_fix_buf_overflow.patch now in debian

ipmitool (1.8.11-5) unstable; urgency=high

  * debian/control: Add libncurses-dev build dependency
  * Don't set umask to fix CVE-2011-4339 (Closes: #651917).

ipmitool (1.8.11-4) unstable; urgency=low

  * debian/control:
- Add ${misc:Depends} so deps can be added by debhelper.
  * debian/README.source: Add reference to quilt docs.
  * debian/ipmitool.ipmievd.init:
- Test if /etc/default/rcS exists, before executing it.
- Add status support (Closes: #536119).
  * debian/ipmitool.{post,pre}{inst,rm}: Add -e.
  * Fix buffer overflow in tsol session.
  * Update Vcs-Browser as URL mentioned within Alioth's gitweb
interface does not work.

ipmitool (1.8.11-3) unstable; urgency=high

  * debian/control:
- Add myself as co-maintainer.
- Add Vcs entries.
- Update Architecture to any as ipmitool can be used for
  remote devices (Closes: #578492).
  * Only approach rsp-data when rsp is set (Closes: #637423).
 -- Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com   Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:49:15 +0100

** Changed in: ipmitool (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ipmitool in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914920

Title:
  Please merge ipmitool 1.8.11-5 (universe) from Debian testing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipmitool/+bug/914920/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 916680] [NEW] package swat 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-01-14 Thread steve morgan
Public bug reported:

Was asked to delete incorrect configuration data, instead of choosing
keep I chose FOrward when upgrading from 11.04 to 11.10.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: swat 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-13.53-generic 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-13-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Jan 14 21:58:19 2012
ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script 
returned error exit status 1
RelatedPackageVersions:
 nautilus 1:3.2.1-0ubuntu3.1
 gvfs 1.10.0-0ubuntu1
SambaClientRegression: Yes
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package swat 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2012-01-15 (0 days ago)

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 oneiric

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916680

Title:
  package swat 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
  error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/916680/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 916680] Re: package swat 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-01-14 Thread steve morgan
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916680

Title:
  package swat 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
  error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/916680/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 916271] Re: [Sync Request] fonts-nanum-eco(1.000-1) from Debian unstable(main)

2012-01-14 Thread Jinkyu Yi
Oops, something wrong...(maybe Ctrl+C,V mistake)
I fix the bug title correctly now!

** Summary changed:

- fonts-nanum-gothic
+ [Sync Request] fonts-nanum-eco(1.000-1) from Debian unstable(main)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916271

Title:
  [Sync Request] fonts-nanum-eco(1.000-1) from Debian unstable(main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/916271/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 861061] Re: [regression] All apps have a lower frame rate under Unity.

2012-01-14 Thread Daniel van Vugt
I'm sure there are other performance bugs we haven't pinpointed yet. If
you have Sync To VBlank enabled (which is default) then 60 FPS is
probably to be expected. Because the framerate should be the same as
your monitor; never higher.

Unfortunately with a few compiz/unity performance bugs pending and their
fixes not available for testing yet, it's hard to tell what's what. And
very difficult for anyone to identify which bug they're experiencing
with certainty. It will get easier as more fixes are released...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861061

Title:
  [regression] All apps have a lower frame rate under Unity.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/861061/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 909103] Re: kernel 2.6.38.13 (radeon) oopses crashing the session

2012-01-14 Thread gene
The 3.0 version of the kernel seems to be free of the bug:
uname -a
Linux 3.0.14-030014-generic #201112211655 SMP Wed Dec 21 22:03:55 UTC 2011 i686 
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
uptime
 up 13 days, 23:19

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/909103

Title:
  kernel 2.6.38.13 (radeon) oopses crashing the session

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/909103/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 836588]

2012-01-14 Thread Ramana-gcc
(In reply to comment #14)
 Note, can't be reproduced on the trunk, the strcmp isn't DCEd there, but guess
 the problem is just latent there.
 
 It looks like a target bug to me.  Before RTL loop opts we have:
 (insn 91 90 92 13 (set (reg:SI 167)
 (unspec:SI [
 (const:SI (unspec:SI [
 (symbol_ref/v/f:SI (*.LC4) [flags 0x82] 
 var_decl 0x7f5ebb0a5500 *.LC4)
 (const:SI (plus:SI (unspec:SI [
 (const_int 4 [0x4])
 ] 21)
 (const_int 8 [0x8])))
 ] 27))
 ] 3)) pr48308.i:228 170 {pic_load_addr_32bit}
  (nil))
 
 (insn 92 91 94 13 (set (reg:SI 167)
 (unspec:SI [
 (reg:SI 167)
 (const_int 8 [0x8])
 (const_int 4 [0x4])
 ] 4)) pr48308.i:228 173 {pic_add_dot_plus_eight}
  (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (symbol_ref/v/f:SI (*.LC4) [flags 0x82]  var_decl
 0x7f5ebb0a5500 *.LC4)
 (nil)))
 
 and the pseudo 167 is then used to load one of the strcmp parameters.
 Then (probably loop invariant motion) moves insn 91 before the loop, as it
 looks to be loop invariant, but insn 92 is kept in the loop.
 Next during RA, the register pressure is high and thus pseudo 167 is spilled,
 so
 before the loop there is a store.  Then during the *.csa pass DCE is performed
 and the strcmp is removed, which means insn 92 is removed as well, but the
 store before the loop of course is kept.  And there is no further DSE pass 
 that
 would optimize that (now dead) store away.
 So, IMHO arm_reorg needs to handle this case, find out what minipool entries
 don't have the corresponding UNSPEC_PIC_BASE insn and handle them somehow
 (either by emitting there a dummy 0 or similar, or trying to replace the insn
 with UNSPEC_PIC_SYM with something else, ...).
 That said, perhaps it would be nice to help the loop optimizers somehow figure
 out that even the UNSPEC_PIC_BASE is loop invariant (wrap it into CONST?).


Found it I think- the problem is way before any of this . A transformation 
in combine looks suspicious. 

The first clue to all this was that the compiler was removing a call of
strcmp with .LC4 which is the constant string -noout . If you look at
the testcase, there is a use of noout afterwards which is to call :

   if (!noout)   
 PEM_write_bio_Parameters(out,pkey);

However the condition

 else if (strcmp(*args,-text) == 0)
   text=1;

has a value of text set to 1.

However given text is not used later that is the only call 
to strcmp that can be removed safely. However the strcmp of -text is retained 
in the final code generated but the call to strcmp of -noout is the one 
that's getting eliminated. 

Here's the suspicious transformation after combine:


(insn 97 96 188 13 (set (reg:SI 168)
(reg:SI 0 r0)) ./t.i:41 624 {*arm_movsi_vfp}
 (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 0 r0)
(nil)))

(insn 188 97 189 13 (set (reg:CC 24 cc)
(compare:CC (reg:SI 168)
(const_int 0 [0]))) ./t.i:41 198 {*arm_cmpsi_insn}
 (nil))

(insn 189 188 191 13 (set (reg/v:SI 136 [ badarg ])
(if_then_else:SI (eq (reg:CC 24 cc)
(const_int 0 [0]))
(reg:SI 168)
(const_int 0 [0]))) ./t.i:41 220 {*movsicc_insn}
 (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 168)
(nil)))

(insn 191 189 153 13 (set (reg/v:SI 135 [ noout ])
(if_then_else:SI (ne (reg:CC 24 cc)
(const_int 0 [0]))
(reg/v:SI 135 [ noout ])
(const_int 1 [0x1]))) ./t.i:41 220 {*movsicc_insn}
 (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:CC 24 cc)
(nil)))
 

is transformed to :

(note 97 96 188 13 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)

(note 188 97 189 13 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)

(insn 189 188 191 13 (set (reg/v:SI 136 [ badarg ])
(const_int 0 [0])) ./t.i:41 624 {*arm_movsi_vfp}
 (nil))

(insn 191 189 153 13 (parallel [
(set (reg/v:SI 135 [ noout ])
(if_then_else:SI (ne (reg:SI 168)
(const_int 0 [0]))
(reg/v:SI 135 [ noout ])
(const_int 1 [0x1])))
(clobber (reg:CC 24 cc))
]) ./t.i:41 273 {movcond}
 (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 24 cc)
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 168)
(nil


Look at the use of reg:SI 168  in insn 191 rather than reg:SI r0 . That's where 
it all goes pear shaped as we've now used reg:SI 168 which we've not defined 
before. The other bits of info from .combine is as below.  

Trying 97 - 188:
Successfully matched this instruction:
(parallel [
(set (reg:CC 24 cc)
(compare:CC (reg:SI 0 r0)
(const_int 0 [0])))
(set (reg:SI 168)
(reg:SI 0 r0))
])

and then further trying to combine insn 188 into insn 189 we get the
following


Trying 188 - 189:
Failed to match this instruction:
(parallel [
 

[Bug 836588]

2012-01-14 Thread Ramana-gcc
(In reply to comment #14)
 Note, can't be reproduced on the trunk, the strcmp isn't DCEd there, but guess
 the problem is just latent there.

Latent still in trunk with the testcase - you can try it with -fdbg-
cnt=cprop:0 with the first reduced testcase and you should be able to
see the same behaviour with trunk. The other testcase which is in
PR50313 also fails with the same error on trunk (with -Os -fPIC
-mcpu=arm9tdmi -marm )

The problem with reduced^2 testcase or reduced testcase appears to get
fixed if we add LOG_LINKS to keep track of the dummy i1 in the form of a
patch of the following nature.

combine.c: try_combine attempts to create a dummy i1 instruction in case
i1 is NULL and i2 looks like

(parallel [(set (reg:CC X) (compare:CC OP (const_int 0)))
   (set Y OP)])

which is exactly how the intermediate instruction looks

(parallel [
(set (reg:CC 24 cc)
(compare:CC (reg:SI 0 r0)
(const_int 0 [0])))
(set (reg:SI 168)
(reg:SI 0 r0))
])

i1 now becomes

  (set (reg:SI 168)
(reg:SI 0 r0))

and i2 becomes

(set (reg:CC 24 cc)
(compare:CC (reg:SI 0 r168)
(const_int 0 [0])))

but there are no LOG_LINKS to indicate that even when we've created the
dummy i1 - i2 actually feeds into i1. After changing try_combine[1] to
create a LOG_LINKS to indicate this relationship between i1 and i2 we no
longer eliminate the wrong strcmp call and therefore this should IMHO be
the handled in combine rather than faffing around in the backend.

However this doesn't fix the testcase from PR50313 (gmime.i) which
prima-facie appeared to exhibit the same behaviour as this particular
testcase and that needs reopening and further investigation to be sure
that the IR is valid when cfgcleanup decides to eliminate the PIC insn
in.


cheers
Ramana


diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c
index 4178870..f6b8769 100644
--- a/gcc/combine.c
+++ b/gcc/combine.c
@@ -2865,6 +2865,8 @@ try_combine (rtx i3, rtx i2, rtx i1, rtx i0, int 
*new_direct_jump_p,
  SUBST (PATTERN (i2), XVECEXP (PATTERN (i2), 0, 0));
  SUBST (XEXP (SET_SRC (PATTERN (i2)), 0),
 SET_DEST (PATTERN (i1)));
+ LOG_LINKS (i2) = alloc_insn_link (i1, LOG_LINKS (i2));
+
}
 }
 #endif

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836588

Title:
  armel FTBFS with gcc 4.5 org 4.6 O2 and fPIC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/836588/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 696532]

2012-01-14 Thread Björn Michaelsen
Cant reproduce with 3.5.0beta2 = WORKSFORME

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696532

Title:
  LibreOffice - smoketest disabled for the i386 build, fails on the
  buildds

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/696532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916404] Re: indicator-sound-service assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/indicator-sound/indicator-sound-service: free(): invalid pointer: 0xb75d4ff4 ***

2012-01-14 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 914883 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914883

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better.  This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #914883, so is being marked as such.  Please
look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information
that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916404/+attachment/2673997/+files/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment removed: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916404/+attachment/2673998/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment removed: Disassembly.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916404/+attachment/2673999/+files/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment removed: ProcStatus.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916404/+attachment/2674001/+files/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment removed: Registers.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916404/+attachment/2674002/+files/Registers.txt

** Attachment removed: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916404/+attachment/2674004/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 914883

** Visibility changed to: Public

** Tags removed: need-i386-retrace

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916404

Title:
  indicator-sound-service assert failure: *** glibc detected ***
  /usr/lib/indicator-sound/indicator-sound-service: free(): invalid
  pointer: 0xb75d4ff4 ***

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-sound/+bug/916404/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916403] Re: '3.2.0-9.16' should be called '3.2.1-9.16'

2012-01-14 Thread Brad Figg
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.

However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is such a request.

We have noted that there is a newer version of the development kernel
than the one you last tested when this issue was found. Please test
again with the newer kernel and indicate in the bug if this issue still
exists or not.

You can update to the latest development kernel by simply running the
following commands in a terminal window:

sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade

If the bug still exists, change the bug status from Incomplete to New.
If the bug no longer exists, change the bug status from Incomplete to
Fix Released.

If you want this bot to quit automatically requesting kernel tests, add
a tag named: bot-stop-nagging.

 Thank you for your help, we really do appreciate it.


** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Tags added: kernel-request-3.2.0-9.16

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916403

Title:
  '3.2.0-9.16' should be called '3.2.1-9.16'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/916403/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916389] Re: Unable to read the attached DVDROM during System Testing

2012-01-14 Thread Ubuntu Foundation's Bug Bot
** Package changed: ubuntu = linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916389

Title:
  Unable to read the attached DVDROM during System Testing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/916389/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 696532] Re: LibreOffice - smoketest disabled for the i386 build, fails on the buildds

2012-01-14 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: df-libreoffice
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696532

Title:
  LibreOffice - smoketest disabled for the i386 build, fails on the
  buildds

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/696532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916408] Re: apport-gtk crashed with UnicodeEncodeError in urlencode(): 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 75-85: ordinal not in range(128)

2012-01-14 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 896626 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/896626

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better.  This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #896626, so is being marked as such.  Please
look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information
that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

** Attachment removed: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916408/+attachment/2674014/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment removed: ProcStatus.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916408/+attachment/2674017/+files/ProcStatus.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 896626

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916408

Title:
  apport-gtk crashed with UnicodeEncodeError in urlencode(): 'ascii'
  codec can't encode characters in position 75-85: ordinal not in
  range(128)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/916408/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 916230] Re: Unity dock should extent to top of screen when not autohiding.

2012-01-14 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
I'm having second thoughts about this, please drop it from 12.04 unless 
John Lea specifically wants to pursue it.

Mark

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916230

Title:
  Unity dock should extent to top of screen when not autohiding.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/916230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 915600] Re: Changing brightness request root (super user) permission

2012-01-14 Thread jan2ary
Confirm that fixed with 3.2.2-0ubuntu10, thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915600

Title:
  Changing brightness request root (super user) permission

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/915600/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 880768] Re: The whole window manager sometimes freezes when switching workspaces or when opening the workspace switcher

2012-01-14 Thread Márton Kiss
Additional info:
I can experience this bug only with an attached external monitor. When I'm 
using the notebook as a standalone primary display the freezing never appears.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880768

Title:
  The whole window manager sometimes freezes when switching workspaces
  or when opening the workspace switcher

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/880768/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916410] [NEW] HP 6540B soft wireless switch not working

2012-01-14 Thread Ian Booth
Public bug reported:

There are two issues:

1. Bug 914838
The softkey is unmapped

2. The softkey, after being maped, does not do anything.

In oneiric, this was solved by manually installing the urfkill package.
However, after upgrading to precise, it no longer works.

Even when it was working in oneiric, there was a small issue. The HP
laptop docs say that if any wireless device (wifi or  bluetooth) is
active, the softkey light should be blue, and in Windows it works this
way. However, in oneiric, using the bluetooth indicator applet to turn
off just bluetooth makes the light orange (disabled) even though
wireless is still active. The reason is as follows:

 'rfkill list' shows 2 bluetooth devices:

ian@wallyworld:/etc$ rfkill list
0: hp-wifi: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
1: hp-bluetooth: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
3: phy1: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
16: hci0: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no

The bluetooth indicator applet does a 'rfkill block 1'. What it needs to
do instead is 'rfkill block 16'. If I do this manually, this stops
bluetooth (and even the bluetooth indicator goes grey as expected), but
it correctly leaves the soft key light blue because wireless is still
working.

ian@wallyworld:/etc$ sudo rfkill block 16
ian@wallyworld:/etc$ rfkill list
0: hp-wifi: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
1: hp-bluetooth: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
3: phy1: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
16: hci0: Bluetooth
Soft blocked: yes
Hard blocked: no

Sadly, each time bluctooth is toggled on/off, the item number for
hci0:bluetooth increments by one, so the next time it would need to do a
rfkill block 17 etc.

Ideally, the bluetooth indicator on/off would toggle the hci0:bluetooth
device and then everything would be as expected.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: acpi-support 0.138
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Jan 14 18:06:22 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Beta amd64 (20110901)
SourcePackage: acpi-support
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago)

** Affects: acpi-support (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916410

Title:
  HP 6540B soft wireless switch not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpi-support/+bug/916410/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916410] Re: HP 6540B soft wireless switch not working

2012-01-14 Thread Ian Booth
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916410

Title:
  HP 6540B soft wireless switch not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpi-support/+bug/916410/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916384]

2012-01-14 Thread Ubuntu Foundation's Bug Bot
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.  It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general.  It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people interested in the package can find the bugs
about it.  You can find some hints about determining what package your
bug might be about at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage.
You might also ask for help in the #ubuntu-bugs irc channel on Freenode.

To change the source package that this bug is filed about visit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/916384/+editstatus and add the
package name in the text box next to the word Package.

[This is an automated message.  I apologize if it reached you
inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]

** Tags added: bot-comment

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916384

Title:
  Thunderbolt port does not return VGA signal on reboot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/916384/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916399]

2012-01-14 Thread Ubuntu Foundation's Bug Bot
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.  It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general.  It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people interested in the package can find the bugs
about it.  You can find some hints about determining what package your
bug might be about at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage.
You might also ask for help in the #ubuntu-bugs irc channel on Freenode.

To change the source package that this bug is filed about visit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/916399/+editstatus and add the
package name in the text box next to the word Package.

[This is an automated message.  I apologize if it reached you
inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]

** Tags added: bot-comment

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916399

Title:
  after the latest routine dailu update was inadverently interrupted ,
  now my Ubuntu 11.10 won't even get to login screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/916399/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916411] [NEW] Cannot find the git binary! Is git installed and is in PATH?

2012-01-14 Thread Thomas Bechtold
Public bug reported:

Steps to reproduce:

1) Start libreoffice
2) new calc document
3) open Help-About libreoffice

There's this text:

LibreOffice 3.5.0beta2 
Build ID: 
Cannot find the git binary! Is git installed and is in PATH?

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: libreoffice (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu2
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Jan 14 09:20:23 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110426)
SourcePackage: libreoffice
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (0 days ago)

** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916411

Title:
  Cannot find the git binary! Is git installed and is in PATH?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916411/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916411] Re: Cannot find the git binary! Is git installed and is in PATH?

2012-01-14 Thread Thomas Bechtold
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916411

Title:
  Cannot find the git binary! Is git installed and is in PATH?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916411/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 864233] Re: Window focus problem

2012-01-14 Thread majesty
Also have this bug. When I open window, and it opens unfocused, I cant
switch to previous window via unity launcher, because it have focus
already. Must click to new window to take focus, ant then to previous.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/864233

Title:
  Window focus problem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-core/+bug/864233/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916403] Re: '3.2.0-9.16' should be called '3.2.1-9.16'

2012-01-14 Thread Stenten
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

** Tags removed: kernel-request-3.2.0-9.16
** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916403

Title:
  '3.2.0-9.16' should be called '3.2.1-9.16'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/916403/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916403] Missing required logs.

2012-01-14 Thread Brad Figg
This bug is missing log files that will aid in diagnosing the problem.
From a terminal window please run:

apport-collect 916403

and then change the status of the bug to 'Confirmed'.

If, due to the nature of the issue you have encountered, you are unable
to run this command, please add a comment stating that fact and change
the bug status to 'Confirmed'.

This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the
Ubuntu Kernel Team.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916403

Title:
  '3.2.0-9.16' should be called '3.2.1-9.16'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/916403/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916389] Re: Unable to read the attached DVDROM during System Testing

2012-01-14 Thread Brad Figg
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916389

Title:
  Unable to read the attached DVDROM during System Testing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/916389/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916230] Re: Unity dock should extent to top of screen when not autohiding.

2012-01-14 Thread Tim Penhey
Agreed.  Not for  12.04.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916230

Title:
  Unity dock should extent to top of screen when not autohiding.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/916230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916178] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-01-14 Thread Mark Murphy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271

An apt-get -f install worked this morning. Subsequently ran apt-get dist
upgrade, all is working again!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916178

Title:
  package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916178/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916178] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-01-14 Thread Mark Murphy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271

This bug is now solved.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916178

Title:
  package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916178/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661573] Re: Please sync axis2c (1.6.0-2.2) from Debian Sid (main) to Ubuntu (universe)

2012-01-14 Thread Aron Xu
** Changed in: axis2c (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661573

Title:
  Please sync axis2c (1.6.0-2.2) from Debian Sid (main) to Ubuntu
  (universe)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/axis2c/+bug/661573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 877358] Re: QtAccessibility causes crashes in several applications

2012-01-14 Thread Dave
Hello.

I've got amarok crashing on me since I upgraded to oneiric. The full bug
report is in the kde tracker here
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291421, and that has been confirmed
as a dupliacte of https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=284005, which
points to here for the fix.

However, I've enabled proposed updates and installed at-spi2-core
2.2.2-0ubuntu1.1, but it doesn't fix the problem. Amarok still crashes
whenever it tries to start playing something.

** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #291421
   http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291421

** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #284005
   http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=284005

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877358

Title:
  QtAccessibility causes crashes in several applications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at-spi2-core/+bug/877358/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916403] Re: '3.2.0-9.16' should be called '3.2.1-9.16'

2012-01-14 Thread Stenten
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916403

Title:
  '3.2.0-9.16' should be called '3.2.1-9.16'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/916403/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 916230] Re: Unity dock should extent to top of screen when not autohiding.

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Smith
Will follow up with john lea on Monday to confirm plans for 12.10

Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:

Agreed.  Not for  12.04.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Unity
Bugs, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916230

Title:
  Unity dock should extent to top of screen when not autohiding.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/916230/+subscriptions

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916230

Title:
  Unity dock should extent to top of screen when not autohiding.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/916230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 864992] Re: Show Containing Folder button failed to execute err

2012-01-14 Thread Bartosz Kosiorek
I installed the evince from proposed for Ubuntu Oneiric, and the Show
Containing Folder button is working now without problem.

Before installation the error was displayed after click  the Show
Containing Folder button.

So verification was successfull

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/864992

Title:
  Show Containing Folder button failed to execute err

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/864992/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 832034] Re: Firefox always says Well, this is embarrassing if it was open at logout

2012-01-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832034

Title:
  Firefox always says Well, this is embarrassing if it was open at
  logout

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/832034/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 915271] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty

2012-01-14 Thread Mark Murphy
apt-get -f install and apt-get dist-upgrade worked perfectly this
morning.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271

Title:
  package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/':
  Directory not empty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/915271/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 915271] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty

2012-01-14 Thread elhoir
sudo apt-get update  sudo apt-get install -f worked perfecty for me
now

thank you so much

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271

Title:
  package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/':
  Directory not empty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/915271/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 681954] Re: WebM should be supported

2012-01-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: dvdrip (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681954

Title:
  WebM should be supported

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dvdrip/+bug/681954/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 915271] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty

2012-01-14 Thread Jerry
just upgraded, didn't get libreoffice-writer
and previously had problems with libreoffice-gcj
not being found,
but I'm running -calc now, and seems to be OK,
will let you know if there are more problems ;-/


On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Scott Lewin scle...@gmail.com wrote:
 I just did a complete removal of all libre-office packages and a install
 of libreoffice-calc and it worked 100% perfect.  Thanks, Great job! :)

 --
 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
 duplicate bug report (915345).
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271

 Title:
  package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/':
  Directory not empty

 Status in LibreOffice Productivity Suite:
  New
 Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
 Status in “libreoffice” source package in Precise:
  Fix Released

 Bug description:
  running updates/upgrades on Precise machine and message popped up
  saying it needed to report this bug.

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-7.13-generic 3.2.0-rc7
  Uname: Linux 3.2.0-7-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Jan 12 11:44:43 2012
  DuplicateSignature:
   Unpacking replacement libreoffice-math ...
   Preparing to replace libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 (using 
 .../libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_amd64.deb) ...
   rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory 
 not empty
   dpkg: error processing 
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-core_1%3a3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2_amd64.deb 
 (--unpack):
    subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
  ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit 
 status 1
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012)
  SourcePackage: libreoffice
  Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: 
 subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-05 (6 days ago)

 To manage notifications about this bug go to:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/915271/+subscriptions


-- 
Jerry W

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271

Title:
  package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/':
  Directory not empty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/915271/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 916411] Re: Cannot find the git binary! Is git installed and is in PATH?

2012-01-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916411

Title:
  Cannot find the git binary! Is git installed and is in PATH?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916411/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 910296] Re: Please backport the upstream patch to prevent attacks based on hash collisions

2012-01-14 Thread Ted Reed
Initial testing shows a crash from the error message there. A version
with the error message pulled out seems to be functioning.

There may be additional code from 2.3.9 that the Ubuntu version doesn't
have and needs to support the error message.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910296

Title:
  Please backport the upstream patch to prevent attacks based on hash
  collisions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/910296/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 915740] Re: package libreoffice-base-core 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured

2012-01-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915740

Title:
  package libreoffice-base-core 1:3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu2 failed to
  install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving
  unconfigured

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/915740/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916415] Re: Ubuntu outrageously unstable

2012-01-14 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 854780 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854780

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better.  This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #854780, so is being marked as such.  Please
look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information
that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916415/+attachment/2674039/+files/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment removed: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916415/+attachment/2674040/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment removed: Disassembly.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916415/+attachment/2674041/+files/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment removed: ProcStatus.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916415/+attachment/2674043/+files/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment removed: Registers.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916415/+attachment/2674044/+files/Registers.txt

** Attachment removed: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916415/+attachment/2674046/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 854780

** Visibility changed to: Public

** Tags removed: need-amd64-retrace

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916415

Title:
  Ubuntu outrageously unstable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/916415/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916420] [NEW] package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

2012-01-14 Thread MarcinStac
Public bug reported:

I got some experiment repository update and then the sh.it happened

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Jan 14 10:30:00 2012
ErrorMessage: bcmwl kernel module failed to build
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1)
PackageVersion: 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3.2
SourcePackage: bcmwl
Title: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3.2 failed to 
install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-10-15 (91 days ago)

** Affects: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916420

Title:
  package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3.2 failed to
  install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/916420/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916420] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

2012-01-14 Thread MarcinStac
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916420

Title:
  package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3.2 failed to
  install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/916420/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 874241] Re: Wrong resolutions in lightdm login screen when using external monitor connected to laptop

2012-01-14 Thread 5oak
Don't know if it will help you guys, but here are two workarounds:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/73804/wrong-login-screen-resolution

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874241

Title:
  Wrong resolutions in lightdm login screen when using external monitor
  connected to laptop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-greeter/+bug/874241/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916419] [NEW] Signing in to sync on already existing account fails the first time round

2012-01-14 Thread Jani Uusitalo
Public bug reported:

I've reproduced this on three separate computers, each running Precise.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Start Software Center.
2. From the File menu, choose Sync Between Computers...
3. From the registration window, choose to login to you existing account. Enter 
your credentials and continue forward.

What happens:
In addition to the window saying you're now signed in, you also get the 
registration window. Sync is not available in the main window.

What I expect to happen:
To have only the successful sign-in window appear (i.e. not the registration 
window again) and have sync working in the main window.

Workaround:
Start the Sync procedure again. Repeat steps 1.-3. above. This time it works as 
I expect it to: the registration window doesn't re-appear after entering my 
credentials, and I get the sync view in the main window.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: software-center 5.1.5.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.14-generic 3.2.0
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic i686
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Jan 14 11:24:58 2012
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: software-center
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2011-12-09 (35 days ago)

** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug apport-lpi i386 precise running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916419

Title:
  Signing in to sync on already existing account fails the first time
  round

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/916419/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916419] Re: Signing in to sync on already existing account fails the first time round

2012-01-14 Thread Jani Uusitalo
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916419

Title:
  Signing in to sync on already existing account fails the first time
  round

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/916419/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916416] [NEW] Closing an app from a group of apps should give focus to the next app in that group

2012-01-14 Thread markba
Public bug reported:

When there are multiple instances open from the same program and you
close one instance from that group, the focus is not set to the next
instance in that group. It is not clear what the rules of resetting the
focus are, but it is not expected behaviour that focus is set to a
'random' app.

Use case 1:
- a user has multiple instances open of EOG (non-tabs)
- he wants to close all those instances by clicking on the close-button on top 
one by one
- everytime he closes an  instance, he has to switch (by the launcher or 
otherwise) to the next instance he likes to close which is very 
counterproductive

Use case 2:
- a user has Firefox open and the separate download-window
- he closes the download window and expects to return to Firefox
- this is however not the case, so he is somewhere lost

** Affects: unity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916416

Title:
  Closing an app from a group of apps should give focus to the next app
  in that group

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/916416/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916422] [NEW] nvidia-173 173.14.30-0ubuntu8: nvidia-173 kernel module failed to build

2012-01-14 Thread Bernd Schlapsi
Public bug reported:

I installed Ubuntu 12.04 Desktop on my Dell XPS M1330.
The live session works fine but after installation I get the message ubuntu is 
running in low-graphics mode when starting the pc. I opened the bug #912381 
from the terminal.

Every day I update the system from the terminal and try to run the
system. I also tried to install the nvidia driver and this always
failed.

After the latest updates the system starts the login screen now but
after log in this error occurs.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: nvidia-173 173.14.30-0ubuntu9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic-pae 3.2.0
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
.proc.driver.nvidia.version:
 NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86 Kernel Module  173.14.30  Thu Apr 14 08:47:14 
PDT 2011
 GCC version:  gcc version 4.6.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.2-10ubuntu1)
.tmp.unity.support.test.0:
 
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu2
Architecture: i386
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: None
DKMSKernelVersion: 3.2.0-8-generic-pae
Date: Thu Jan 12 18:23:28 2012
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: precise
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus: nvidia-173, 173.14.30, 3.2.0-8-generic-pae, i686: installed
GraphicsCard:
 nVidia Corporation G86 [GeForce 8400M GS] [10de:0427] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 
[VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0209]
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (20120102)
JockeyStatus:
 xorg:nvidia_173 - NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (Proprietary, Enabled, In 
use)
 xorg:nvidia_173_updates - NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (post-release 
updates) (Proprietary, Disabled, Not in use)
 xorg:nvidia_current - NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (Proprietary, 
Disabled, Not in use)
 xorg:nvidia_current_updates - NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (post-release 
updates) (Proprietary, Disabled, Not in use)
MachineType: Dell Inc. XPS M1330
PackageVersion: 173.14.30-0ubuntu8
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-8-generic-pae 
root=UUID=0f231cf4-6534-4206-ba52-15bb6c561663 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-173
Title: nvidia-173 173.14.30-0ubuntu8: nvidia-173 kernel module failed to build
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 12/26/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A15
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.chassis.type: 8
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA15:bd12/26/2008:svnDellInc.:pnXPSM1330:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr:
dmi.product.name: XPS M1330
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.6+bzr20110929-0ubuntu8
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.30-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.11-0ubuntu4
version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.11-0ubuntu4
version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.10.4-1ubuntu6
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.6.0-1ubuntu13
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 
1:6.14.99~git20110811.g93fc084-0ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.15.901-1ubuntu4
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:0.0.16+git20111201+b5534a1-1

** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 precise regression reproducible ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916422

Title:
  nvidia-173 173.14.30-0ubuntu8: nvidia-173 kernel module failed to
  build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-173/+bug/916422/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916422] Re: nvidia-173 173.14.30-0ubuntu8: nvidia-173 kernel module failed to build

2012-01-14 Thread Bernd Schlapsi
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916422

Title:
  nvidia-173 173.14.30-0ubuntu8: nvidia-173 kernel module failed to
  build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-173/+bug/916422/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916422] Re: nvidia-173 173.14.30-0ubuntu8: nvidia-173 kernel module failed to build

2012-01-14 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916422

Title:
  nvidia-173 173.14.30-0ubuntu8: nvidia-173 kernel module failed to
  build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-173/+bug/916422/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 915271] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/': Directory not empty

2012-01-14 Thread Lazar Stojkovic
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu Precise)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Lazar Stojkovic (anarox994)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915271

Title:
  package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  rmdir: failed to remove `usr/lib/libreoffice/basis3.4/program/':
  Directory not empty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/915271/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


RE: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share

2012-01-14 Thread Faldegast
Perhaps we need to gather information about such successes and spread the 
information. If we can find enough data perhaps we can get press attention and 
thus more attention from game studios.

Perhaps you are referring to projects like The Humble Indie Bundle.
Such games are often very inspired by old games, but naturally avoid
using any original material...

Interestingly enough The Humble Indie Bundle stats show that there are
more Linux gamers then OS X gamers.

If we can find more such stats then we can claim that Linux GAMING
MARKET SHARE is larger then OS X, imagine what such headlines does to
game studio decision makers... Remember then market share != user share.

 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:12:48 +
 From: 1...@bugs.launchpad.net
 To: faldeg...@hotmail.com
 Subject: RE: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
 
 Hi :)
 The point i was making is that such things have moved on from just a couple 
 of years ago.  The games industry has made occasional forays into 
 GnuLinux-land but never gains traction.  This is despite such forays 
 sometimes making significant profits.  
 
 I don't know how true but there is a story about someone porting quite a
 few famous legacy games such as Elite and releasing in a few different
 sizes and then asking people to pay what they felt it was worth, even
 allowing people to download for free.  The unexpected result was that
 a huge amount of cash flooded in and when broken down by OS it was the
 GnuLinux users that paid far more per download and in total.
 
 The games industry then did what people normally do when they find
 something enourmously successful and highly profitable but a little
 unusual and possibly contra-intuitive.  They ignored the results.
 
 Regards from
 Tom :)
 
 
 --- On Thu, 12/1/12, Faldegast 1...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
 
 From: Faldegast 1...@bugs.launchpad.net
 Subject: RE: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
 To: tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
 Date: Thursday, 12 January, 2012, 23:09
 
 It is. But there is still far more games released for OS X. If we grow
 larger then OS X, then we will have more games then OS X...
 
  Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:59:51 +
  From: 1...@bugs.launchpad.net
  To: faldeg...@hotmail.com
  Subject: RE: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
  
  Hi :)
  Perhaps try these links 
  http://www.unixmen.com/gaming-on-linux1131-19-awesome-opensource-games-for-linux/
  http://trine-thegame.com/site/
  It is possible to purchase games that run in GnuLinux.  Those people need 
  to know that you are using GnuLinux if you buy them.  If you do buy them 
  make a point of writing in to tell them you use GnuLinux.  I must admit i 
  haven't bought as i find endless enjoyment from Wesnoth, Glest and some 
  other native GnuLinux games.
  Regards from
  Tom :)
  
  
  --- On Thu, 12/1/12, Faldegast 1...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
  
  From: Faldegast 1...@bugs.launchpad.net
  Subject: RE: [Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
  To: tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk
  Date: Thursday, 12 January, 2012, 19:23
  
  OS X is not that much larger. I think growing as large as OS X should be
  our goal. That would make it required to make Linux version of games and
  other apps that we dont have...
  
  -- 
  You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
  report.
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
  
  Title:
Microsoft has a majority market share
  
  Status in Club Distro:
Confirmed
  Status in Computer Science Ubuntu:
Confirmed
  Status in dylan.NET.Reflection:
Invalid
  Status in dylan.NET:
Invalid
  Status in EasyPeasy Overview:
Invalid
  Status in Ichthux - Linux for Christians:
Invalid
  Status in JAK LINUX:
Invalid
  Status in LibreOffice:
In Progress
  Status in The Linux Kernel:
New
  Status in The Linux Mint Distribution:
In Progress
  Status in The Linux OS Project:
In Progress
  Status in The Metacity Window Manager:
In Progress
  Status in The OpenOffice.org Suite:
In Progress
  Status in Tabuntu:
Invalid
  Status in A simple player to online TV streaming:
Invalid
  Status in Tv-Player:
New
  Status in Ubuntu Gnome Remix Metapackages:
In Progress
  Status in Ubuntu:
In Progress
  Status in “ubuntu-express” package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
  Status in The Jaunty Jackalope:
Invalid
  Status in “ubuntu-express” source package in Jaunty:
Invalid
  Status in Arch Linux:
New
  Status in Baltix GNU/Linux:
Invalid
  Status in “linux” package in Debian:
In Progress
  Status in Fluxbuntu: The Lightweight, Productive, Agile OS:
Confirmed
  Status in openSUSE:
In Progress
  Status in Tilix Linux:
New
  
  Bug description:
Microsoft has a majority market share in the new desktop PC marketplace.
This is a bug, which Ubuntu is designed to fix.
  
Non-free software is holding back innovation in the IT industry,
restricting access to IT to a small 

[Bug 801178] Re: Wiithon won't start / open

2012-01-14 Thread Carlo Mandelli
** Changed in: wiithon
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801178

Title:
  Wiithon won't start / open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/wiithon/+bug/801178/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 682715] Re: WIITHON CRASH AT START

2012-01-14 Thread Carlo Mandelli
** Changed in: wiithon
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682715

Title:
  WIITHON CRASH AT START

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/wiithon/+bug/682715/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916423] Re: gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()

2012-01-14 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 811689 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811689

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better.  This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #811689, so is being marked as such.  Please
look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information
that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916423/+attachment/2674088/+files/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment removed: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916423/+attachment/2674089/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment removed: Disassembly.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916423/+attachment/2674090/+files/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment removed: ProcStatus.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916423/+attachment/2674093/+files/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment removed: Registers.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916423/+attachment/2674094/+files/Registers.txt

** Attachment removed: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916423/+attachment/2674096/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 811689
   gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()

** Visibility changed to: Public

** Tags removed: need-amd64-retrace

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916423

Title:
  gnome-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/916423/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916429] [NEW] changelog.Debian.gz links to itself

2012-01-14 Thread Tormod Volden
Public bug reported:

$ ls -l /usr/share/doc/ure/changelog.Debian.gz 
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Jan 13 20:02 /usr/share/doc/ure/changelog.Debian.gz 
- ../ure/changelog.Debian.gz

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: ure 3.5.0~beta2-2ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic-pae 3.2.0
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic-pae i686
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu2
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Jan 14 11:17:19 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (20111225)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: libreoffice
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-12 (1 days ago)

** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916429

Title:
  changelog.Debian.gz links to itself

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916429/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916429] Re: changelog.Debian.gz links to itself

2012-01-14 Thread Tormod Volden
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916429

Title:
  changelog.Debian.gz links to itself

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916429/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916056] Re: Missing mouse buttons

2012-01-14 Thread marmuta
Thanks for the bug report, David. There seems to be a character encoding
mismatch that only breaks Onboard in certain locales. I was already
working on making sure those can't happen again, but unfortunaltely
0.96.1 is still affected.

Please be so kind, run onboard from a terminal and post the ouput. I suspect 
there will be a python backtrace that confirms this.
Also please post the ouput of 'locale'.

As a workaround, see if running onboard in english helps. This only changes the 
language of the user interface and won't affect your keyboard layout:
LANG=en_US.UTF-8 onboard

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916056

Title:
  Missing mouse buttons

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/onboard/+bug/916056/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916430] [NEW] Bug in ftdi_sio in linux 3.0.0-14-generic

2012-01-14 Thread Shashank Chintalagiri
Public bug reported:

There seems to be a bug in the ftdi_sio driver shipped with ubuntu
11.10. I've been able to reproduce the bug on both 64-bit (x86_64) and
32 bit machines.

The Problem :

Connecting an FT2232H programmed to function in CPU FIFO mode in channel
A to a ubuntu machine causes the driver to crash immediately. dmesg
provides a long and, to me, incomprehensible trace which I've pasted
below.  Once this happens, I need to restart my computer before it does
anything with an FTDI again. Possibly, forcing the ftdi_sio to unload
would be sufficient, but I'm not certain how to achieve that effect. The
lsusb entry for the FTDI also does not disappear after disconnection,
and lsusb -v hangs, probably while trying to probe the device.

This does not happen when the FT2232H is programmed to function as a
dual UART (the default configuration).

The same chip with the same configuration works fine on a machine
running Fedora 14 with linux-2.6.35.6-45-fc14.

How to reproduce :

Plug in an FTDI FT2232H with channel configured in CPU FIFO mode.

dmesg output :

[ 4002.848065] usb 2-2: new high speed USB device number 6 using ehci_hcd
[ 4002.984791] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 
  (null)
[ 4002.988011] IP: [a05ee3ab] ftdi_8u2232c_probe+0x3b/0x80 [ftdi_sio]
[ 4002.988011] PGD 0 
[ 4002.988011] Oops:  [#1] SMP 
[ 4002.988011] CPU 1 
[ 4002.988011] Modules linked in: usb_storage uas hidp xt_conntrack 
iptable_filter ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack 
nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_tables x_tables bnep rfcomm vboxnetadp vboxnetflt vboxdrv 
parport_pc ppdev binfmt_misc dm_crypt ftdi_sio usbserial joydev 
snd_hda_codec_idt snd_hda_codec_hdmi btusb uvcvideo videodev 
v4l2_compat_ioctl32 bluetooth snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep dell_wmi 
sparse_keymap snd_pcm snd_seq_midi dell_laptop dcdbas snd_rawmidi psmouse 
lib80211_crypt_tkip r592 r852 sm_common nand nand_ids nand_bch bch nand_ecc 
serio_raw memstick mtd wl(P) snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq lib80211 snd_timer 
snd_seq_device snd soundcore snd_page_alloc coretemp lp parport btrfs 
zlib_deflate libcrc32c usbhid hid ahci libahci i915 firewire_ohci sdhci_pci 
sdhci firewire_core wmi crc_itu_t drm_kms_helper sky2 drm i2c_algo_bit video
[ 4002.988011] 
[ 4002.988011] Pid: 20, comm: khubd Tainted: P3.0.0-14-generic 
#23-Ubuntu Dell Inc. Inspiron 1525   /0U990C
[ 4002.988011] RIP: 0010:[a05ee3ab]  [a05ee3ab] 
ftdi_8u2232c_probe+0x3b/0x80 [ftdi_sio]
[ 4003.023739] RSP: 0018:8800b90f3720  EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 4003.023739] RAX: a05ee370 RBX: 88004c3309c0 RCX: 000e
[ 4003.023739] RDX: a05f5f80 RSI:  RDI: a05f173a
[ 4003.023739] RBP: 8800b90f3730 R08: 880076089000 R09: 88004c3309c0
[ 4003.023739] R10:  R11:  R12: 880076089000
[ 4003.023739] R13: a05f6000 R14: a05f2288 R15: 88004dd1cc00
[ 4003.023739] FS:  () GS:8800bf50() 
knlGS:
[ 4003.023739] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 8005003b
[ 4003.023739] CR2:  CR3: 85df2000 CR4: 000406e0
[ 4003.023739] DR0:  DR1:  DR2: 
[ 4003.023739] DR3:  DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400
[ 4003.023739] Process khubd (pid: 20, threadinfo 8800b90f2000, task 
8800b98bc560)
[ 4003.023739] Stack:
[ 4003.023739]  88004c3309c0 a05f2288 8800b90f3750 
a05ee02e
[ 4003.023739]  a05f5c80 88004c3309c0 8800b90f3900 
a05c8c7b
[ 4003.023739]  8800bf512a40   
0001
[ 4003.023739] Call Trace:
[ 4003.023739]  [a05ee02e] ftdi_sio_probe+0x2e/0x50 [ftdi_sio]
[ 4003.023739]  [a05c8c7b] usb_serial_probe+0x14b/0x12d0 [usbserial]
[ 4003.023739]  [812e9c10] ? ida_get_new_above+0x70/0x300
[ 4003.023739]  [811d8fe8] ? sysfs_new_dirent+0x58/0x140
[ 4003.023739]  [811d9273] ? sysfs_find_dirent+0x53/0x70
[ 4003.023739]  [810329b9] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10
[ 4003.023739]  [810329b9] ? default_spin_lock_flags+0x9/0x10
[ 4003.023739]  [81451a73] usb_probe_interface+0xd3/0x1e0
[ 4003.023739]  [813cf738] really_probe+0x68/0x190
[ 4003.023739]  [813cf9c5] driver_probe_device+0x45/0x70
[ 4003.023739]  [813cfaf3] __device_attach+0x53/0x60
[ 4003.023739]  [813cfaa0] ? __driver_attach+0xb0/0xb0
[ 4003.023739]  [813ce4ac] bus_for_each_drv+0x5c/0x90
[ 4003.023739]  [813cf937] device_attach+0xa7/0xc0
[ 4003.023739]  [813ceedd] bus_probe_device+0x2d/0x50
[ 4003.023739]  [813ccfbf] device_add+0x2df/0x3e0
[ 4003.023739]  [8144fef1] usb_set_configuration+0x5d1/0x6d0
[ 4003.023739]  [811d91cb] ? sysfs_addrm_finish+0x1b/0x70
[ 4003.023739]  

[Bug 916430] Re: Bug in ftdi_sio in linux 3.0.0-14-generic

2012-01-14 Thread Shashank Chintalagiri
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916430

Title:
  Bug in ftdi_sio in linux 3.0.0-14-generic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/916430/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 116919] Re: The Synaptic Touchpad is not disabled automatically when an external mouse is attached.

2012-01-14 Thread Borim
In Ubuntu 11.10 the feature auto disabling the touchpad, when a usb
mouse is plugged is still not available. Also I do not want to enable
SHMConfig. Thats why I help myself with following udev rule:

SUBSYSTEM==input, BUS==usb, ACTION==add, ENV{ID_INPUT_MOUSE}==1, 
RUN+=/sbin/rmmod psmouse
SUBSYSTEM==input, BUS==usb, ACTION==remove, ENV{ID_INPUT_MOUSE}==1, 
RUN+=/sbin/modprobe psmouse

I am not 100% happy with this solution, but it works. I do not like to
remove a kernel modul just for disabling a device.  Does someone know a
way to disable the touchpad with a setting, like done with synclient or
xinput, but with disabled SHMConfig?

It would be great if the auto disabling feature would find its way into
ubuntu, after such a long time.

Cheers Borim

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116919

Title:
  The Synaptic Touchpad is not disabled automatically when an external
  mouse is attached.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics/+bug/116919/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 728745] Re: [nvidia, 7300, 7400] display freeze when using unity desktop

2012-01-14 Thread Yuan Fei
Thanks to #38 and #145, the driver 275.43 works on my asus a6j laptop.
But the newest driver 290.10 on the NVIDIA website didn't work. After I
installed it, I couldn't get to the login screen, only black screen with
many words left there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728745

Title:
  [nvidia, 7300, 7400] display freeze when using unity desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/728745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916430] Re: Bug in ftdi_sio in linux 3.0.0-14-generic

2012-01-14 Thread Brad Figg
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916430

Title:
  Bug in ftdi_sio in linux 3.0.0-14-generic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/916430/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916422] Re: nvidia-173 173.14.30-0ubuntu8: nvidia-173 kernel module failed to build

2012-01-14 Thread Bernd Schlapsi
I reinstalled my system and using the open source driver.  So the system
works at the moment.

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916422

Title:
  nvidia-173 173.14.30-0ubuntu8: nvidia-173 kernel module failed to
  build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-173/+bug/916422/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 912381] Re: Error ubuntu is running in low-graphics mode directly after installation

2012-01-14 Thread Bernd Schlapsi
I reinstalled my system and using the open source driver.  So the system
works at the moment.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912381

Title:
  Error ubuntu is running in low-graphics mode directly after
  installation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jockey/+bug/912381/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 842566] Re: Libreoffice and unity integration broken.

2012-01-14 Thread Miklos Juhasz
The fix has not been backported to Oneiric yet. You can find the bamf package 
with the patch for this bug in my ppa: ppa:mjuhasz/backports
Please be aware that the ppa has other packages with various backported fixes. 
I suggest you only upgrade bamf unless you specifically need another package.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842566

Title:
  Libreoffice and unity integration broken.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bamf/+bug/842566/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 819721] Re: quicklists not accessible for the first time just after login

2012-01-14 Thread Miklos Juhasz
On Oneiric the bug is in nux and not in Unity. You can find the nux package 
with the patch for this bug in my ppa: ppa:mjuhasz/backports
Please be aware that the ppa has other packages with various backported fixes. 
I suggest you only upgrade nux.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819721

Title:
  quicklists not accessible for the first time just after login

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/819721/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916357] Re: soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in X11SalGraphics::GetResolution()

2012-01-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916357

Title:
  soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in X11SalGraphics::GetResolution()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916357/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916357] Re: soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in X11SalGraphics::GetResolution()

2012-01-14 Thread Aurimas Fišeras
Same problem here. If I disconnect my second monitor, LibreOffice works.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916357

Title:
  soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in X11SalGraphics::GetResolution()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916357/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916437] [NEW] package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс новый сценарий pre-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

2012-01-14 Thread Мария Черняева
Public bug reported:

...

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.15-generic 3.2.0
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Jan 14 14:48:35 2012
ErrorMessage: подпроцесс новый сценарий pre-installation возвратил код ошибки 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20111228)
SourcePackage: libreoffice
Title: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: 
подпроцесс новый сценарий pre-installation возвратил код ошибки 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-12 (1 days ago)

** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916437

Title:
  package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  подпроцесс новый сценарий pre-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916437/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 916437] Re: package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс новый сценарий pre-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

2012-01-14 Thread Мария Черняева
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916437

Title:
  package libreoffice-core 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  подпроцесс новый сценарий pre-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/916437/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 916436] [NEW] ITP: qesteidutil -- QT utility for managing Estonian ID cards

2012-01-14 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
Public bug reported:

This is the 4th of 6 software packages needed to implement support for
Estonian national ID cards, including digital signature of legally-
binding documents.  The whole codebase has been undergoing heavy testing
for a good two years via the ~esteid development team's PPA and we feel
that it has sufficiently matured to be distributed via normal Ubuntu
releases.

See Bug #916303 for additional details.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916436

Title:
  ITP: qesteidutil -- QT utility for managing Estonian ID cards

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/916436/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916435] Re: grub-setup crashed with SEGV in __libc_start_main()

2012-01-14 Thread Tuomas Heino
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916435

Title:
  grub-setup crashed with SEGV in __libc_start_main()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/916435/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916434] [NEW] ITP: libdigidocpp -- C++ library for Digidoc3 support

2012-01-14 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
Public bug reported:

This is the 3rd of 6 software packages needed to implement support for
Estonian national ID cards, including digital signature of legally-
binding documents. Other packages depend upon this library to provide
support for embedding digitally signed documents. The whole codebase has
been undergoing heavy testing for a good two years via the ~esteid
development team's PPA and we feel that it has sufficiently matured to
be distributed via normal Ubuntu releases.

See Bug #916303 for additional details.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916434

Title:
  ITP: libdigidocpp -- C++ library for Digidoc3 support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/916434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 334122] Re: Mobile broadband connections fail to connect

2012-01-14 Thread jimmykarily
For the record in my case just changing the number to  *99#  like
berend-de-schouwer proposed made it work. Don't know why though

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334122

Title:
  Mobile broadband connections fail to connect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/knetworkmanager/+bug/334122/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916440] [NEW] ITP: esteid-browser-plugin -- Mozilla plug-in for digitally signing online content with an ID card

2012-01-14 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
Public bug reported:

This is the 6th of 6 software packages needed to implement support for
Estonian national ID cards, including digital signature of legally-
binding documents. The whole codebase has been undergoing heavy testing
for a good two years via the ~esteid development team's PPA and we feel
that it has sufficiently matured to be distributed via normal Ubuntu
releases.

See Bug #916303 for additional details.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916440

Title:
  ITP: esteid-browser-plugin -- Mozilla plug-in for digitally signing
  online content with an ID card

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/916440/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916439] [NEW] ITP: qdigidoc -- QT application for digitally signing documents with an ID card

2012-01-14 Thread Martin-Éric Racine
Public bug reported:

This is the 5th of 6 software packages needed to implement support for
Estonian national ID cards, including digital signature of legally-
binding documents. The whole codebase has been undergoing heavy testing
for a good two years via the ~esteid development team's PPA and we feel
that it has sufficiently matured to be distributed via normal Ubuntu
releases.

See Bug #916303 for additional details.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916439

Title:
  ITP: qdigidoc -- QT application for digitally signing documents with
  an ID card

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/916439/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 915945] Re: Unreadable labels with light wallpaper

2012-01-14 Thread Fitoschido
Nautilus always have drawn the desktop's text that way. There are plenty
of posts in the blogosphere about this matter.

Now with Nautilus 3.2.x, the work to draw the text's shadow passed to be
a GTK theme's task, and since the themes are witten with CSS, I wonder
if the text's shadow style can be edited like in a web page. If that is
possible, I would add a bigger, blurred shadow to the text, fixing this
bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915945

Title:
  Unreadable labels with light wallpaper

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/915945/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 911079] Re: Error messages from Extensions hidden

2012-01-14 Thread ~suv
@JazzyNico, @John - while I tended to oppose to fix the overlay-
scrollbar issues in Inkscape itself for each of the affected widgets
separately, maybe the problem reported here could be addressed in a way
that would satisfy other needs as well? I'm thinking of the fact that
the initial size of the dialog - especially when used e.g. for debugging
purposes in the development process of extensions - is rather small
which at some point had triggered a (now reverted) change to always open
the dialog in maximized state - see bug #813807.

How difficult would it be to make the dialog remember its last use
window size (and position), and adjust (or expand) the size of the text
field (scrollwindow) to the restored dialog size (instead of using a
hard-coded minimal height)?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911079

Title:
  Error messages from Extensions hidden

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/911079/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916433] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in std::listunity::debug::Introspectable*, std::allocatorunity::debug::Introspectable* ::remove()

2012-01-14 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916258 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916258

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better.  This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #916258, so is being marked as such.  Please
look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information
that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916433/+attachment/2674174/+files/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment removed: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916433/+attachment/2674175/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment removed: Disassembly.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916433/+attachment/2674176/+files/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment removed: ProcStatus.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916433/+attachment/2674178/+files/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment removed: Registers.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916433/+attachment/2674179/+files/Registers.txt

** Attachment removed: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916433/+attachment/2674181/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 916258

** Visibility changed to: Public

** Tags removed: need-amd64-retrace

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916433

Title:
  compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in
  std::listunity::debug::Introspectable*,
  std::allocatorunity::debug::Introspectable* ::remove()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/916433/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916306] Re: Grub2 defaults with boot option of 'vt.handoff=7' in /boot/grub/grub.cfg with server 11.10.

2012-01-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 913731 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913731

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916306

Title:
  Grub2 defaults with boot option of 'vt.handoff=7' in
  /boot/grub/grub.cfg with server 11.10.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/916306/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916306] Re: Grub2 defaults with boot option of 'vt.handoff=7' in /boot/grub/grub.cfg with server 11.10.

2012-01-14 Thread Tuomas Heino
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 913731 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913731

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 913731
   non-X installs still have vt.handoff=7

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916306

Title:
  Grub2 defaults with boot option of 'vt.handoff=7' in
  /boot/grub/grub.cfg with server 11.10.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/916306/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 879379] Re: Bad appearance of windows' close button in GNOME Shell when it's displayed alone

2012-01-14 Thread Fitoschido
** Summary changed:

- close button in 'ambiance' windows theme looks bad (square around or sign'
+ Bad appearance of windows' close button in GNOME Shell when it's displayed 
alone

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879379

Title:
  Bad appearance of windows' close button in GNOME Shell when it's
  displayed alone

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/879379/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916435] Stacktrace.txt

2012-01-14 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916435/+attachment/2674205/+files/Stacktrace.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916435

Title:
  grub-setup crashed with SEGV in __libc_start_main()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/916435/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916435] ThreadStacktrace.txt

2012-01-14 Thread Apport retracing service
** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916435/+attachment/2674206/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Tags added: apport-failed-retrace

** Tags removed: need-amd64-retrace

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916435

Title:
  grub-setup crashed with SEGV in __libc_start_main()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/916435/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 871287] Re: Highlight colour vs. text colour on indicator-session 'restart to finish updates'

2012-01-14 Thread Fitoschido
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 904368 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904368

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 904368
   The red color used for restart should not be used on prelight

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871287

Title:
  Highlight colour vs. text colour on indicator-session 'restart to
  finish updates'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/871287/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 913731] Re: non-X installs still have vt.handoff=7

2012-01-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913731

Title:
  non-X installs still have vt.handoff=7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/913731/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916438] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in g_datalist_id_set_data_full()

2012-01-14 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 916228 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916228

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better.  This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #916228, so is being marked as such.  Please
look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information
that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug.
Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in
the other report.  Please continue to report any other bugs you may
find.

** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916438/+attachment/2674196/+files/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment removed: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916438/+attachment/2674197/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment removed: Disassembly.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916438/+attachment/2674198/+files/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment removed: ProcStatus.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916438/+attachment/2674201/+files/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment removed: Registers.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916438/+attachment/2674202/+files/Registers.txt

** Attachment removed: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916438/+attachment/2674204/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 916228

** Visibility changed to: Public

** Tags removed: need-amd64-retrace

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916438

Title:
  compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in g_datalist_id_set_data_full()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/+bug/916438/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 916435]

2012-01-14 Thread Apport retracing service
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 __libc_start_main (main=0x403ef0, argc=4, ubp_av=0x7fff1cad8b38, 
init=optimized out, fini=optimized out, rtld_fini=optimized out, 
stack_end=0x7fff1cad8b28) at libc-start.c:226
 ?? ()

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916435

Title:
  grub-setup crashed with SEGV in __libc_start_main()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/916435/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 848270] Re: dark toolbar in nautilus

2012-01-14 Thread Fitoschido
It is an style matter that depends on personal preferences, and it's not
technically a bug. So I'm closing this as Opinion.

** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848270

Title:
  dark toolbar in nautilus

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/848270/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 848270] Re: dark toolbar in nautilus

2012-01-14 Thread Fitoschido
To clarify, IMHO the horrible thing is Nautilus and its truncated
toolbar, and not Ambiance. The Nautilus toolbar looks horrible even with
Adwaita or Radiance, bot the color contrast under that themes is not
that accented as in Ambiance.

** Tags removed: light-themes nautilus

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848270

Title:
  dark toolbar in nautilus

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/848270/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 848274] Re: Gradient in window decoration isn’t smooth as in previous versions

2012-01-14 Thread Fitoschido
Agree. It is also inconsistent with the Unity menu bar, which is still
smooth.

** Summary changed:

- light-themes
+ Gradient in window decoration isn’t smooth as in previous versions

** Tags removed: light-themes nautilus

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848274

Title:
  Gradient in window decoration isn’t smooth as in previous versions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/848274/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >