[Bug 1499602] Re: atop crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1022865 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022865 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1373639 atop crashed with SIGFPE in acctprocnt() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1022865 atop crash with SIGFPE -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1499602 Title: atop crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/atop/+bug/1499602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1565294] Re: atop crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1022865 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022865 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1373639 atop crashed with SIGFPE in acctprocnt() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1022865 atop crash with SIGFPE -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1565294 Title: atop crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/atop/+bug/1565294/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1539867] Re: atop crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1022865 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022865 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1373639 atop crashed with SIGFPE in acctprocnt() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1022865 atop crash with SIGFPE -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539867 Title: atop crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/atop/+bug/1539867/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1615477] Re: atop crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1022865 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022865 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1373639 atop crashed with SIGFPE in acctprocnt() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1022865 atop crash with SIGFPE -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615477 Title: atop crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/atop/+bug/1615477/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1590150] Re: atop crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1022865 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022865 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1373639 atop crashed with SIGFPE in acctprocnt() ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1022865 atop crash with SIGFPE -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1590150 Title: atop crashed with SIGFPE in __libc_start_main() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/atop/+bug/1590150/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1616372] Re: [FFe] cmake 3.6.2
Seems that the hdf5 regression (there was a partial one) has been fixed in 3.6.2 https://blog.kitware.com/cmake-3-6-2-available-for-download/ If I get the exception I'm willing to package it even ahead from Debian. ** Summary changed: - [FFe] cmake 3.6.1 + [FFe] cmake 3.6.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616372 Title: [FFe] cmake 3.6.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cmake/+bug/1616372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1506358] Re: unity8/libmirclient gives up and terminates prematurely with "std::exception::what: disconnected: no new buffers" via ExchangeSemantics::submit()
The correct milestone for this bug is 13 (OTA-13) in canonical-devices- system-image. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1506358 Title: unity8/libmirclient gives up and terminates prematurely with "std::exception::what: disconnected: no new buffers" via ExchangeSemantics::submit() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1506358/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1171236] Re: file-roller may delete the content of linked folder (?)
** Bug watch removed: GNOME Bug Tracker #647753 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647753 ** Summary changed: - file-roller may delete the content of linked folder (?) + file-roller may delete the content of linked folder ** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171236 Title: file-roller may delete the content of linked folder To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/1171236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1618988] Re: unity8 goes to black screen 'n freeze after logout attempt
** Tags added: black-screen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1618988 Title: unity8 goes to black screen 'n freeze after logout attempt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1618988/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1621746] Re: Black Screen, libprotobuf FATAL program was compiled against version 2.6.1 which is not compatible with the installed version (3.0.0)
This is a critical bug, but possibly also not valid. The offending version of protobuf is not released. It's still in proposed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protobuf So I guess this should just serve as a reminder to rebuild users of protobuf before v3 hits yakkety. ** Tags added: black-screen ** Also affects: canonical-devices-system-image Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Tags added: unity8-desktop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621746 Title: Black Screen, libprotobuf FATAL program was compiled against version 2.6.1 which is not compatible with the installed version (3.0.0) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1621746/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1621121] Re: VM fails to start when vcpu placement='auto'
Hi, libvirt is build --with-numactl on amd64 i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc ppc64el s390x You can check effectively if it was built against it by checking for the lib depend like: ldd /usr/sbin/libvirtd | grep numa libnuma.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnuma.so.1 (0x7f99e4a39000) For further debugging until we can reproduce, can you enable more debugging of libvirt and add the more verbose libvirt log here so you and we can check for issues in it? See: http://libvirt.org/guide/html/Application_Development_Guide-Connections-Debug.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621121 Title: VM fails to start when vcpu placement='auto' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1621121/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1621386] Re: [MIR] libsodium
I reviewed libsodium version 1.0.10-1 as checked into yakkety. This shouldn't be considered a full security audit but rather a quick check of maintainability. Furthermore this is not an audit of the fitness for purpose of the cryptography in libsodium. - No CVE history in our database - libsodium provides a programmer- and packager-friendly library around the NaCl family of cryptography APIs. - Depends: debhelper, pkg-config, dh-autoreconf - Does not itself do networking - Extensive cryptopgrahy - Does not daemonize - No pre/post inst/rm - No init scripts - No dbus services - No setuid files - No binaries in the PATH - No sudo fragments - No udev rules - A test suite is run during the build - No cron jobs - Clean build logs - No subprocesses spawned - Memory management is careful, perhaps to the point of picky; it has its own routines that set up guard pages and provide byte-tainting of objects. - Does not itself do file IO beyond /dev/random or /dev/urandom - No logging - No environment variable use - No privileged functions - No networking - No privileged portions of code - No temp files - No WebKit - No PolKit - Extensive cppcheck warnings; manual inspection of randomly selected issues suggests failings in cppcheck. libsodium's code is necessarily complicated; writing timing-resistant AES is very difficult, writing timing-resistant GCM mode is very difficult, and I wouldn't be surprised if there are going to be more flaws discovered in both these code paths. The ECC, ChaCha20, and Poly1305 code certainly requires expert advice to modify. However, that said, the NaCl APIs are easier for application authors to use properly than other cryptography libraries, and libsodium has the combined support of the opensource cryptographic communities. Security team ACK for promoting libsodium to main. Thanks ** Changed in: libsodium (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621386 Title: [MIR] libsodium To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsodium/+bug/1621386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1621746] Re: Black Screen, libprotobuf FATAL program was compiled against version 2.6.1 which is not compatible with the installed version (3.0.0)
libprotobuf 3.0.0-7ubuntu3 amd64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621746 Title: Black Screen, libprotobuf FATAL program was compiled against version 2.6.1 which is not compatible with the installed version (3.0.0) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1621746/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1505666] Re: package libsdformat3-dev 3.1.1-1build1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/sdformat/SDFormatConfig.cmake', which is also in package libsdf
Ubuntu 15.10 is EOL now, please set the status back to new if the issue persists. thanks ** Changed in: sdformat (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505666 Title: package libsdformat3-dev 3.1.1-1build1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/cmake/sdformat/SDFormatConfig.cmake', which is also in package libsdformat-dev:amd64 2.3.0-1build1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdformat/+bug/1505666/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
