[Bug 1888764] Re: [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-baird-meta
Attach oem-sutton.simon-baird-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem-scripts 0.63. ** Description changed: [Availability] This is a meta package for https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM that means the package doesn't exist in Debian or Ubuntu archive yet. - oem-sutton.simon-baird-meta 20.04~ubuntu1 for focal in ppa:oem-solutions-engineers/oem-projects-meta and source code in below link. - https://code.launchpad.net/~oem-solutions-engineers/pc-enablement/+git/oem-sutton-projects-meta/+ref/simon.baird-focal-ubuntu + The source code of the oem-sutton.simon-baird-meta for focal: + git clone -b simon.baird-focal-ubuntu https://git.launchpad.net/~oem-solutions-engineers/pc-enablement/+git/oem-sutton-projects-meta [Rationale] - We want to improve the hardware support for ThinkStation P340 Tiny on focal. + We want to improve the hardware support for ThinkStation P340 Tiny. [Security] No CVE/known security issue. [Quality assurance] - I have used ppa:oem-solutions-engineers/oem-projects-meta to check this package on ThinkStation P340 Tiny and it works as expected. + I have used ppa:oem-solutions-engineers/oem-projects-meta to check this package on ThinkStation P340 Tiny. oem-sutton.simon-baird-meta will be upgraded to 20.04ubuntu1 or latest version from OEM archive. [Dependencies] It only depends on ubuntu-oem-keyring. [Standards compliance] This package should have met all requirements of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM. [Maintenance] Canonical OEM Enablement Team will take care of the maintenance. [Background information] Please check https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM for details. - Please make sure you have attached the debdiff generated by the "oem- - metapackage-mir-check" script from lp:ubuntu-archive-tools into the bug + Please use "oem-metapackage-mir-check" in lp:ubuntu-archive-tools to + verify this MIR against the reference package in the archive. ** Changed in: oem-priority Importance: High => Critical ** Changed in: oem-priority Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Confirmed ** Attachment removed: "oem-sutton.simon-baird-meta.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888764/+attachment/5422516/+files/oem-sutton.simon-baird-meta.debdiff ** Patch added: "oem-sutton.simon-baird-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888764/+attachment/5430942/+files/oem-sutton.simon-baird-meta_20.04~ubuntu1.debdiff ** Tags added: oem-scripts-0.63 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888764 Title: [MIR] oem-sutton.simon-baird-meta To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1888764/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1898325] Re: Gnome calendar is not syncing with Google calendar online account.
Thank you for your bug report, could you sent it also upstream to https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/issues ? ** Changed in: gnome-calendar (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898325 Title: Gnome calendar is not syncing with Google calendar online account. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-calendar/+bug/1898325/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1901505] Re: upgrade to 20.10 broke haswell laptop (no regular boot, no /dev/dri/card0)
Please test latest mainline kernel: https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v5.10-rc2/amd64/ ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901505 Title: upgrade to 20.10 broke haswell laptop (no regular boot, no /dev/dri/card0) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1901505/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1893300] Re: The status of cups still shows idle when the printer has been unplugged
** Tags added: rls-ff-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893300 Title: The status of cups still shows idle when the printer has been unplugged To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1893300/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1896091] Re: [i915] Noise-like lines of graphics corruption when moving windows in Xorg sessions
PSR is disable on Ubuntu. Please try kernel parameter "i915.enable_psr=1". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896091 Title: [i915] Noise-like lines of graphics corruption when moving windows in Xorg sessions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1896091/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902563] Re: Phone icon keeps flashing on random times on the dock mounting and unmounting the device
20.10 has the same version of the ubuntu-dock, but newer GNOME other things. If you're confident it's fixed in 20.10 then we should mark this as fixed. But we can only fix 20.04 if someone finds out which package fixed it... ** Package changed: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu) => ubuntu ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902563 Title: Phone icon keeps flashing on random times on the dock mounting and unmounting the device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1902563/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902842] [NEW] package apt-cacher-ng 3.3.1-2build1 failed to install/upgrade: installed apt-cacher-ng package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Had to sudo chown apt-cacher-ng /var/log/apt-cacher-ng ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: apt-cacher-ng 3.3.1-2build1 Uname: Linux 5.9.3-050903-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.10 AptOrdering: apt-cacher-ng:amd64: Install NULL: ConfigurePending Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip Date: Wed Nov 4 16:41:51 2020 ErrorMessage: installed apt-cacher-ng package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-10-03 (763 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180725) Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.2ubuntu0.1 SourcePackage: apt-cacher-ng Title: package apt-cacher-ng 3.3.1-2build1 failed to install/upgrade: installed apt-cacher-ng package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal third-party-packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902842 Title: package apt-cacher-ng 3.3.1-2build1 failed to install/upgrade: installed apt-cacher-ng package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-cacher-ng/+bug/1902842/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1849142] Re: appindicator extension slows down GUI spamming the log with "[AppIndicatorSupport-FATAL] unable to lookup icon ..." or "Impossible to lookup icon"
Is the slowdown gone too? We are assuming that was closely correlated with the logging. Also please confirm which version of the gnome-shell-extension- appindicator package you are testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849142 Title: appindicator extension slows down GUI spamming the log with "[AppIndicatorSupport-FATAL] unable to lookup icon ..." or "Impossible to lookup icon" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-appindicator/+bug/1849142/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902563] Re: Phone icon keeps flashing on random times on the dock mounting and unmounting the device
i tested this on a fresh install 20.10 also seems like to work by default there nov 04 09:33:53 gorilla-X201EP dbus-daemon[1622]: [session uid=1000 pid=1622] Activating service name='org.gnome.Shell.HotplugSniffer' requested by ':1.35' (uid=1000 pid=1916 comm="/usr/bin/gnome-shell " label="unconfined") nov 04 09:33:53 gorilla-X201EP dbus-daemon[1622]: [session uid=1000 pid=1622] Successfully activated service 'org.gnome.Shell.HotplugSniffer' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902563 Title: Phone icon keeps flashing on random times on the dock mounting and unmounting the device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1902563/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902840] [NEW] brush tools can not set and don't write on pdf.
Public bug reported: start gimp open pdf file use pen and try.. color apear only on text zone ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: gimp 2.10.18-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-52.57-generic 5.4.65 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-52-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.10 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Wed Nov 4 09:26:16 2020 InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-10-02 (398 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20190805) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gimp UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2020-08-19 (76 days ago) ** Affects: gimp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902840 Title: brush tools can not set and don't write on pdf. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/1902840/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902563] Re: Phone icon keeps flashing on random times on the dock mounting and unmounting the device
@ #4 Seb128 Weirdly after re-enable the gsettings again it seems not doing that mount/unmount spam anymore just a few gvfsd warnings (see journal2) the icon on the dock looks pretty stable now ** Attachment added: "journal2.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1902563/+attachment/5430907/+files/journal2.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902563 Title: Phone icon keeps flashing on random times on the dock mounting and unmounting the device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1902563/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902836] [NEW] package firmware-b43-installer 1:019-4 failed to install/upgrade: installed firmware-b43-installer package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: my wifi was turing off after some time, ubuntu network settings said no wifi harware found, thenn i installed firmware-b43-installer and now it does not show any wifi netwrok. i am using LAN for now. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: firmware-b43-installer 1:019-4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-52.57-generic 5.4.65 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-52-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.10 AptOrdering: b43-fwcutter:amd64: Install firmware-b43-installer:amd64: Install NULL: ConfigurePending Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip Date: Wed Nov 4 13:29:02 2020 ErrorMessage: installed firmware-b43-installer package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-11-04 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731) PackageArchitecture: all Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.2ubuntu0.1 SourcePackage: b43-fwcutter Title: package firmware-b43-installer 1:019-4 failed to install/upgrade: installed firmware-b43-installer package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902836 Title: package firmware-b43-installer 1:019-4 failed to install/upgrade: installed firmware-b43-installer package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1902836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1510060] Re: test regression: TestCloneUpgrade.test_clone_upgrade_synthetic
FTR this is back in Hirsute and seems it was back bug force-badtested in focal& groovy. See bug 1902830 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510060 Title: test regression: TestCloneUpgrade.test_clone_upgrade_synthetic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-clone/+bug/1510060/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1849142] Re: appindicator extension slows down GUI spamming the log with "[AppIndicatorSupport-FATAL] unable to lookup icon ..." or "Impossible to lookup icon"
Installed proposed package, the issue seems to be gone, at least in the logs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849142 Title: appindicator extension slows down GUI spamming the log with "[AppIndicatorSupport-FATAL] unable to lookup icon ..." or "Impossible to lookup icon" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-appindicator/+bug/1849142/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1891632] Re: The network manager does not check the NM_SETTING_WIRELESS_WAKE_ON_WLAN_IGNORE bit
Verified 1.22.10-1ubuntu2.2 from focal-proposed with packages network- manager, libnm0, gir1.2-nm-1.0, network-manager-config-connectivity- ubuntu installed. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891632 Title: The network manager does not check the NM_SETTING_WIRELESS_WAKE_ON_WLAN_IGNORE bit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1891632/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902830] Re: autopkgtest fails in hirsute - test_clone_upgrade.py
** Description changed: It seems this autopkgtest is broken in 21.04 and the issue is affecting all architecture at the moment. There is nothing yet in -proposed that would indicate a fix is on the way (if it would be an upload to the package). + + + # The Issue == FAIL: test_clone_upgrade_synthetic (__main__.TestCloneUpgrade) test clone upgrade with on-the-fly generated chroots -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_clone_upgrade.py", line 59, in test_clone_upgrade_synthetic self.assertTrue(len(cache.get_changes()) > 0) AssertionError: False is not true -- Ran 2 tests in 12.801s - There is a fail: + Fail log: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt-clone/20201027_023127_1a678@/log.gz And a bunch of retries on the infra by + + + # Retries vorlon: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201028_172522_e07e0@/log.gz juliank: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201028_095059_2ef15@/log.gz bdmurray: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201104_010337_b3a3a@/log.gz But I found no bug that would document the insights so far. Hence I'm filing this one and set the mentioned people on CC here. Especially thins this test blocks python-apt which breaks automated testing using add-apt-repository I'd expect more people will come by and take a look - so documenting a bit can't hurt in this case. + + # Repro + + This fails in local VM autokgtest with/without the packages in proposed. + + + # History + Interestingly there seems to be a pattern of this hitting early -dev cycles (in some of them even being an issue up to late in the cycle). Groovy: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/amd64/a/apt-clone/20200502_094132_932ac@/log.gz Focal: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/a/apt-clone/20191020_095345_3b0ca@/log.gz Bionic: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/amd64/a/apt-clone/20171026_195549_b2b60@/log.gz Therefore this might - for some of us - be a known re-occuring case and just wait for something (an image pushed, a release being mentioned in a data file, ...). The fact that juliank+bdmurray+vorlon have retried the test makes me think it is expected to work already but doesn't? + + + Looking at test hints we have had: + badtest (2015) + https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/commit/?id=32c975e7cb91000fde6a1590b2a34b6677f1fb2c + badtest (2018) + https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/commit/?id=8bdef30c2deb13ff337d27fd2c1fb3efbc8c8d6a + (mass) convert badtest to a reset (2020): + https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/commit/?id=22d2cf67f10a1a5322670dcc9b40bbfeed250a7a + + That finally got me to bug 1510060. + Seems this keeps to continue coming and going. + + I'll maybe propose to change it back to a badtest. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902830 Title: autopkgtest fails in hirsute - test_clone_upgrade.py To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-clone/+bug/1902830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902832] Re: lftp support broken - exits with error_code -11
** Project changed: duplicity => duplicity (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902832 Title: lftp support broken - exits with error_code -11 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/duplicity/+bug/1902832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902830] Re: autopkgtest fails in hirsute - test_clone_upgrade.py
** Description changed: - It seems this autopkgtest is broken in 21.04 + It seems this autopkgtest is broken in 21.04 and the issue is affecting + all architecture at the moment. + + There is nothing yet in -proposed that would indicate a fix is on the + way (if it would be an upload to the package). + == FAIL: test_clone_upgrade_synthetic (__main__.TestCloneUpgrade) test clone upgrade with on-the-fly generated chroots -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_clone_upgrade.py", line 59, in test_clone_upgrade_synthetic self.assertTrue(len(cache.get_changes()) > 0) AssertionError: False is not true -- Ran 2 tests in 12.801s + + There is a fail: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt-clone/20201027_023127_1a678@/log.gz And a bunch of retries on the infra by vorlon: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201028_172522_e07e0@/log.gz juliank: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201028_095059_2ef15@/log.gz bdmurray: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201104_010337_b3a3a@/log.gz But I found no bug that would document the insights so far. Hence I'm filing this one and set the mentioned people on CC here. + Especially thins this test blocks python-apt which breaks automated testing using add-apt-repository I'd expect more people will come by and take a look - so documenting a bit can't hurt in this case. + + + Interestingly there seems to be a pattern of this hitting early -dev cycles (in some of them even being an issue up to late in the cycle). + Groovy: + https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/amd64/a/apt-clone/20200502_094132_932ac@/log.gz + Focal: + https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/a/apt-clone/20191020_095345_3b0ca@/log.gz + Bionic: + https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/amd64/a/apt-clone/20171026_195549_b2b60@/log.gz + + Therefore this might - for some of us - be a known re-occuring case + and just wait for something (an image pushed, a release being mentioned + in a data file, ...). ** Description changed: It seems this autopkgtest is broken in 21.04 and the issue is affecting all architecture at the moment. There is nothing yet in -proposed that would indicate a fix is on the way (if it would be an upload to the package). - == FAIL: test_clone_upgrade_synthetic (__main__.TestCloneUpgrade) test clone upgrade with on-the-fly generated chroots -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_clone_upgrade.py", line 59, in test_clone_upgrade_synthetic self.assertTrue(len(cache.get_changes()) > 0) AssertionError: False is not true -- Ran 2 tests in 12.801s - - There is a fail: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt-clone/20201027_023127_1a678@/log.gz And a bunch of retries on the infra by vorlon: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201028_172522_e07e0@/log.gz juliank: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201028_095059_2ef15@/log.gz bdmurray: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201104_010337_b3a3a@/log.gz But I found no bug that would document the insights so far. Hence I'm filing this one and set the mentioned people on CC here. Especially thins this test blocks python-apt which breaks automated testing using add-apt-repository I'd expect more people will come by and take a look - so documenting a bit can't hurt in this case. - Interestingly there seems to be a pattern of this hitting early -dev cycles (in some of them even being an issue up to late in the cycle).
[Bug 1902832] [NEW] lftp support broken - exits with error_code -11
You have been subscribed to a public bug: We are using duplicity 0.7.17 and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. After upgrading these packages in Ubuntu: Upgrade: libc-bin:amd64 (2.27-3ubuntu1.2, 2.27-3ubuntu1.3) Upgrade: locales:amd64 (2.27-3ubuntu1.2, 2.27-3ubuntu1.3) Upgrade: multiarch-support:amd64 (2.27-3ubuntu1.2, 2.27-3ubuntu1.3) Upgrade: libc6-dev:amd64 (2.27-3ubuntu1.2, 2.27-3ubuntu1.3), Upgrade: libc6:amd64 (2.27-3ubuntu1.2, 2.27-3ubuntu1.3) Upgrade: libc-dev-bin:amd64 (2.27-3ubuntu1.2, 2.27-3ubuntu1.3) the duplicity/lftp support stopped working. It worked for years just fine before that. Basic error message is: Giving up after 5 attempts. BackendException: Error running 'lftp -c "source /tmp/duplicity-gVCsqa-tempdir/mkstemp-serY3Q-1; ( cd etc_backup/ && ls ) || ( mkdir -p etc_backup/ && cd etc_backup/ && ls )"': returned -11, with output: Error/debug output: Using archive dir: /root/.duplicity/etc_daily Using backup name: etc_daily GPG binary is gpg, version 2.2.4 Import of duplicity.backends.acdclibackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.azurebackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.b2backend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.botobackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.cfbackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.dpbxbackend Failed: No module named dropbox Import of duplicity.backends.gdocsbackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.giobackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.hsibackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.hubicbackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.imapbackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.lftpbackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.localbackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.mediafirebackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.megabackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.multibackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.ncftpbackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.onedrivebackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.par2backend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.pydrivebackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.rsyncbackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.ssh_paramiko_backend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.ssh_pexpect_backend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.swiftbackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.sxbackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.tahoebackend Succeeded Import of duplicity.backends.webdavbackend Succeeded LFTP version is 4.8.1 Using temporary directory /tmp/duplicity-_Mgype-tempdir Registering (mkstemp) temporary file /tmp/duplicity-_Mgype-tempdir/mkstemp-55iPLR-1 SETTINGS: set ssl:verify-certificate true set ftp:ssl-allow false set http:use-propfind true set net:timeout 30 set net:max-retries 5 set ftp:passive-mode on debug open -u ',' ftp://hostname.your-storagebox.de Main action: remove-all-but-n-full Acquiring lockfile /root/.duplicity/etc_daily/lockfile duplicity 0.7.17 (February 26, 2018) Args: /usr/bin/duplicity remove-all-but-n-full 7 -v9 --archive-dir=/root/.duplicity --force --name etc_daily --no-encryption ftp://@.your-storagebox.de/etc_full Linux 4.15.0-122-generic #124-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 15 13:03:05 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 /usr/bin/python2 2.7.17 (default, Sep 30 2020, 13:38:04) [GCC 7.5.0] CMD: lftp -c "source /tmp/duplicity-_Mgype-tempdir/mkstemp-55iPLR-1; ( cd etc_full/ && ls ) || ( mkdir -p etc_full/ && cd etc_full/ && ls )" Reading results of 'lftp -c "source /tmp/duplicity-_Mgype-tempdir/mkstemp-55iPLR-1; ( cd etc_full/ && ls ) || ( mkdir -p etc_full/ && cd etc_full/ && ls )"' Backtrace of previous error: Traceback (innermost last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/backend.py", line 369, in inner_retry return fn(self, *args) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/backend.py", line 578, in list return [tobytes(x) for x in self.backend._list()] File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/backends/lftpbackend.py", line 181, in _list _, l, e = self.subprocess_popen(commandline) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/backend.py", line 499, in subprocess_popen (logstr, result, stdout + ' ' + stderr)) BackendException: Error running 'lftp -c "source /tmp/duplicity-_Mgype-tempdir/mkstemp-55iPLR-1; ( cd etc_full/ && ls ) || ( mkdir -p etc_full/ && cd etc_full/ && ls )"': returned -11, with output: -rw-r--r-- 1 u234538-sub2 u234538885032 Oct 28 00:00 duplicity-full-signatures.20201028T01Z.sigtar.gpg -rw-r--r-- 1 u234538-sub2 u234538885113 Oct 29 00:00 duplicity-full-signatures.20201029T01Z.sigtar.gpg -rw-r--r-- 1 u234538-sub2 u234538886172 Oct 30 00:00 duplicity-full-signatures.20201030T01Z.sigtar.gpg -rw-r--r-- 1 u234538-sub2 u234538886175 Oct 31 00:00 duplicity-full-signatures.20201031T02Z.sigtar.gpg -rw-r--r-- 1 u234538-sub2 u234538886163
[Bug 1902830] [NEW] autopkgtest fails in hirsute - test_clone_upgrade.py
Public bug reported: It seems this autopkgtest is broken in 21.04 == FAIL: test_clone_upgrade_synthetic (__main__.TestCloneUpgrade) test clone upgrade with on-the-fly generated chroots -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "test_clone_upgrade.py", line 59, in test_clone_upgrade_synthetic self.assertTrue(len(cache.get_changes()) > 0) AssertionError: False is not true -- Ran 2 tests in 12.801s There is a fail: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt-clone/20201027_023127_1a678@/log.gz And a bunch of retries on the infra by vorlon: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201028_172522_e07e0@/log.gz juliank: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201028_095059_2ef15@/log.gz bdmurray: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201104_010337_b3a3a@/log.gz But I found no bug that would document the insights so far. Hence I'm filing this one and set the mentioned people on CC here. ** Affects: apt-clone (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: It seems this autopkgtest is broken in 21.04 == FAIL: test_clone_upgrade_synthetic (__main__.TestCloneUpgrade) test clone upgrade with on-the-fly generated chroots -- Traceback (most recent call last): - File "test_clone_upgrade.py", line 59, in test_clone_upgrade_synthetic - self.assertTrue(len(cache.get_changes()) > 0) + File "test_clone_upgrade.py", line 59, in test_clone_upgrade_synthetic + self.assertTrue(len(cache.get_changes()) > 0) AssertionError: False is not true -- Ran 2 tests in 12.801s - There is a fail: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt-clone/20201027_023127_1a678@/log.gz And a bunch of retries on the infra by vorlon: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201028_172522_e07e0@/log.gz juliank: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201028_095059_2ef15@/log.gz bdmurray: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-hirsute/hirsute/amd64/a/apt- clone/20201104_010337_b3a3a@/log.gz - - But I found no bug that would document the inisights so far. + But I found no bug that would document the insights so far. Hence I'm filing this one and set the mentioned people on CC here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902830 Title: autopkgtest fails in hirsute - test_clone_upgrade.py To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-clone/+bug/1902830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1902829] Re: Missing "Mobile Broadband" menu item
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #971511 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971511 ** Also affects: gnome-shell (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971511 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902829 Title: Missing "Mobile Broadband" menu item To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1902829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs