[Bug 2068566] Re: Noble hangs at boot after failed upgrade

2024-06-06 Thread Faisal Akber
Thanks for the workaround Daniel.  Unfortunately that did not work for
me.

I don’t understand why the upgrade option was presented if it is known
to be problematic.  The upgrades should have been suppressed until a
clean upgrade is available.

In the meantime, what else do you need to help with the X
troubleshooting and boot hang?

What else should I look at here based on known issues with the upgrades?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068566

Title:
  Noble hangs at boot after failed upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2068566/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068687] Re: L2TP VPN is not working in Ubuntu 24.04

2024-06-06 Thread Douglas Kosovic
I'm not sure why the user authentication is failing for you with
go-l2tp's kl2tpd, you could try disabling all of the authentication
methods in the PPP settings other than MSCHAPv2.

You could also try switching to xl2tpd and see if you have the same
problem, e.g.:


  sudo apt install xl2tpd

  sudo apt purge go-l2tp


the other Linux distros you mentioned don't ship with go-l2tp, so they would 
have been defaulting to xl2tpd.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068687

Title:
  L2TP VPN is not working in Ubuntu 24.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-l2tp/+bug/2068687/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068659] Re: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package protontricks - 1.10.5-1ubuntu1

---
protontricks (1.10.5-1ubuntu1) oracular; urgency=medium

  * pytest8-caplog.patch: Update tests for pytest 8 compatibility
(LP: #2068659).

 -- Chris Peterson   Thu, 06 Jun 2024
12:27:04 -0700

** Changed in: protontricks (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068659

Title:
  protontricks/1.10.5-1  vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protontricks/+bug/2068659/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1892860] Re: af_alg07 in crypto / cve-2019-8912 in cve from ubuntu_ltp failed on B/F/J

2024-06-06 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
Found with jammy-lowlatency-hwe-64k 6.5.0-41.41.1~22.04.1 on node wright-kernel.
Failing with "Exceeded execution time, requesting exit" as well.

Maybe we need to extend the execution time.

** Tags added: 6.5 jammy sru-20240429

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892860

Title:
  af_alg07 in crypto / cve-2019-8912 in cve from ubuntu_ltp failed on
  B/F/J

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1892860/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959747]

2024-06-06 Thread Vseerror-i
(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #72)
> > Thanks Wayne. I think the confusing part in this ticket is that there must 
> > have been multiple regressions in terms of CPU over time and I think we are 
> > also mixing X and Wayland (in case that matters). Certainly I also saw a 
> > big slowdown between TB 91 and 102.
> 
> Very possible.

And, if it got even worse in version 115, If you using imap and are
able, please try beta https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/download/beta/
and report your results.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959747

Title:
  [upstream] Very high CPU and slow responsiveness in Thunderbird 91-102

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1959747/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068687] [NEW] L2TP VPN is not working in Ubuntu 24.04

2024-06-06 Thread Ľubomír Mlích
Public bug reported:

I see

level=error tunnel_name=t1 message="unhandled v2 control message"
message_type=avpMsgTypeSli

after upgrading from Ubuntu 23.10 to Ubuntu 24.04 when I try to connect
to L2TP VPN

with network-manager-1.46.0
and network-manager-l2tp 1.20.12

I also see this not working in clean Ubuntu 24.04 installation into
VirtualBox VM, while 23.10 allows me to connect. Tried that quite a lot
and I'm pretty sure that my configuration of VPN is alright (also as it
is working with 23.10)

I also tried to update network-manager-l2tp package using PPA to latest
version and it did not help. I did not succeed when I tried to
change/update version of network manager.

I also know that

networkmanager 1.46.0-2
networkmanager-l2tp 1.20.16-1

in Arch linux works well for someone else.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: network-manager-l2tp 1.20.12-1build2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-35.35-generic 6.8.4
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-35-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Jun  7 07:26:23 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-05-22 (381 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Release amd64 (20230418)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=xterm-256color
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
SourcePackage: network-manager-l2tp
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-05-26 (11 days ago)

** Affects: network-manager-l2tp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble wayland-session

** Attachment added: "debug log during attempt to connect to VPN"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068687/+attachment/5787062/+files/journalctl%20f%20u%20NetworkManager.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068687

Title:
  L2TP VPN is not working in Ubuntu 24.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-l2tp/+bug/2068687/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2062138] Re: test-logprof.py from test_utils_testsuite / test_utils_testsuite3 in ubuntu_qrt_apparmor failing on Azure Standard_A2_v2

2024-06-06 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
Hello Garcia,
thanks for add that patch, I can see that we're now using this 0.3 seconds 
timeout now.

However we have found there are still some exceptions that will still fail with 
this 0.3 seconds timeout:
* M-lowlatency-64k 6.5.0-41.41.1 openstack ARM64 instance
* M-lowlatency 6.5.0-41.41.1 bare-metal ARM64 node "wright-kerenl"
* M-64k 6.5.0-41.41 openstack ARM64 instance

Perhaps we will need a longer timeout.

** Tags added: sru-20240429

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062138

Title:
  test-logprof.py from test_utils_testsuite / test_utils_testsuite3 in
  ubuntu_qrt_apparmor failing on Azure Standard_A2_v2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2062138/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for the update Jacob. I will leave this bug alone and wait to
hear back.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848

Title:
  An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite
  the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/2065848/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068598] Re: Mutter release 46.2

2024-06-06 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068598

Title:
  Mutter release 46.2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2068598/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2062972] Re: ntfs partition does not mount with linux 6.8 and CONFIG_BLK_DEV_WRITE_MOUNTED=n

2024-06-06 Thread Matthias
sudo ntfsfix -d /dev/sda1

fixed this temporarily on my USB key until I plug it in again

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062972

Title:
  ntfs partition does not mount with linux 6.8 and
  CONFIG_BLK_DEV_WRITE_MOUNTED=n

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2062972/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068641] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 apache2: misleading comment in default /etc/apache2/apache2.conf

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello Oliver,

Thank you for making this bug report!

This documentation is pulled directly from Debian which you can find at
[0]. I think it'd be best to have a discussion about this with Debian.
Would you be okay making this bug report with Debian as well?

[0] - https://salsa.debian.org/apache-
team/apache2/-/blob/master/debian/config-
dir/apache2.conf.in?ref_type=heads#L153

** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068641

Title:
  Ubuntu 24.04 apache2: misleading comment in default
  /etc/apache2/apache2.conf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2068641/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068547] Re: package rabbitmq-server 3.12.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote rabbitmq-server, o script post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello, thank you for making this bug report!

Can you please give the status of `systemctl status rabbitmq-
server.service`?

** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068547

Title:
  package rabbitmq-server 3.12.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: o
  subprocesso instalado, do pacote rabbitmq-server, o script post-
  installation retornou erro do status de saída 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2068547/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054343] Re: CVE-2023-4039: ARM64 GCC

2024-06-06 Thread gerald.yang
Hi Matthias,

Could you help to take a look into this backport for focal and jammy?
really appreciate!

Thanks,
Gerald

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054343

Title:
  CVE-2023-4039: ARM64 GCC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-10/+bug/2054343/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067568] Re: iwlwifi Microcode SW error detected

2024-06-06 Thread Nancy Chen
** Tags added: cert-sru regression-proposed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067568

Title:
  iwlwifi Microcode SW error detected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2067568/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064843] Re: Brick SEGFAULTs in 11.1

2024-06-06 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Oracular)
 Assignee: Athos Ribeiro (athos-ribeiro) => Bryce Harrington (bryce)

** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu Noble)
 Assignee: Athos Ribeiro (athos-ribeiro) => Bryce Harrington (bryce)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064843

Title:
  Brick SEGFAULTs in 11.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/2064843/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068683] Re: package openjdk-11-jre-headless:amd64 11.0.23+9-1ubuntu1~22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt

2024-06-06 Thread Apport retracing service
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068683

Title:
  package openjdk-11-jre-headless:amd64 11.0.23+9-1ubuntu1~22.04.1
  failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/2068683/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068683] [NEW] package openjdk-11-jre-headless:amd64 11.0.23+9-1ubuntu1~22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt

2024-06-06 Thread K Pruthvi Sai
Public bug reported:

Pop up is coming of an error

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: openjdk-11-jre-headless:amd64 11.0.23+9-1ubuntu1~22.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-35.35~22.04.1-generic 6.5.13
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-35-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
AptOrdering:
 openjdk-11-jre-headless:amd64: Install
 NULL: ConfigurePending
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Date: Fri Jun  7 09:45:56 2024
ErrorMessage: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-19 (79 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20240220)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.12, unpackaged
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.12, unpackaged
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2.3
 apt  2.4.12
SourcePackage: openjdk-lts
Title: package openjdk-11-jre-headless:amd64 11.0.23+9-1ubuntu1~22.04.1 failed 
to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
modified.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.security.nss.cfg:
 name = NSS
 nssDbMode = noDb
 attributes = compatibility
 handleStartupErrors = ignoreMultipleInitialisation
modified.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.swing.properties:
 # uncomment to set the default look and feel to GTK
 #swing.defaultlaf=com.sun.java.swing.plaf.gtk.GTKLookAndFeel
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.security.default.policy: 2024-01-20T15:57:19
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.security.java.policy: 2024-01-20T15:57:19
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.security.java.security: 2024-01-20T15:57:19
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.security.nss.cfg: 2024-01-20T15:57:19
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.security.policy.README.txt: 
2024-01-20T15:57:19
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.security.policy.limited.default_US_export.policy:
 2024-01-20T15:57:19
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.security.policy.limited.default_local.policy:
 2024-01-20T15:57:19
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.security.policy.limited.exempt_local.policy:
 2024-01-20T15:57:19
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.security.policy.unlimited.default_US_export.policy:
 2024-01-20T15:57:19
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.security.policy.unlimited.default_local.policy:
 2024-01-20T15:57:19
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.security.public_suffix_list.dat: 
2024-01-20T15:57:19
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.sound.properties: 2024-01-20T15:57:19
mtime.conffile..etc.java-11-openjdk.swing.properties: 2024-01-20T15:57:19

** Affects: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068683

Title:
  package openjdk-11-jre-headless:amd64 11.0.23+9-1ubuntu1~22.04.1
  failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/2068683/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068024] Re: race_sched in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test will cause kernel panic on 6.8 with Azure Standard_A2_v2 instance

2024-06-06 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Tags added: patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068024

Title:
  race_sched in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test will cause kernel panic on 6.8
  with Azure Standard_A2_v2 instance

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2068024/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068672] Re: ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "ipykernel_6.29.3-1_6.29.3-1ubuntu1.debdiff" seems to be
a debdiff.  The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug
report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff.  If
the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the
attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are member of the
~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe the team.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by
~brian-murray, for any issue please contact him.]

** Tags added: patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068672

Title:
  ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipykernel/+bug/2068672/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068674] Re: ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "ipython_8.20.0-1_8.20.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" seems to be a
debdiff.  The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report
so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff.  If the
attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the
attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are member of the
~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe the team.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by
~brian-murray, for any issue please contact him.]

** Tags added: patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068674

Title:
  ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipython/+bug/2068674/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1895444] Re: Icons for Chrome web apps won’t show

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for lxqt-panel (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]

** Changed in: lxqt-panel (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895444

Title:
  Icons for Chrome web apps won’t show

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-panel/+bug/1895444/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1895444] Re: Icons for Chrome web apps won’t show

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for pcmanfm-qt (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]

** Changed in: pcmanfm-qt (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895444

Title:
  Icons for Chrome web apps won’t show

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-panel/+bug/1895444/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1989043] Re: lxqt-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in QAction::isSeparator()

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for lxqt-panel (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]

** Changed in: lxqt-panel (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989043

Title:
  lxqt-panel crashed with SIGSEGV in QAction::isSeparator()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxqt-panel/+bug/1989043/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058451] Re: CRITICAL: gnome_get_language_from_locale: assertion '*locale != '\0'' failed

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058451

Title:
  CRITICAL: gnome_get_language_from_locale: assertion '*locale != '\0''
  failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2058451/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059775] Re: Problem with GIMP

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for gimp (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: gimp (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059775

Title:
  Problem with GIMP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gimp/+bug/2059775/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068024] Re: race_sched in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test will cause kernel panic on 6.8 with Azure Standard_A2_v2 instance

2024-06-06 Thread John Cabaj
** Attachment added: "script to execute ubuntu_stress_smoke_test"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2068024/+attachment/5787035/+files/race-sched.sh

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => John Cabaj (john-cabaj)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068024

Title:
  race_sched in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test will cause kernel panic on 6.8
  with Azure Standard_A2_v2 instance

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2068024/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068024] Re: race_sched in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test will cause kernel panic on 6.8 with Azure Standard_A2_v2 instance

2024-06-06 Thread John Cabaj
** Patch added: "patch to ubuntu_stress_smoke_test to speed up testing"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2068024/+attachment/5787034/+files/0001-Only-race-sched.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068024

Title:
  race_sched in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test will cause kernel panic on 6.8
  with Azure Standard_A2_v2 instance

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2068024/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068024] Re: race_sched in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test will cause kernel panic on 6.8 with Azure Standard_A2_v2 instance

2024-06-06 Thread John Cabaj
** Attachment added: "bisect log identifying fix commit"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2068024/+attachment/5787033/+files/fix_commit_bisect.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068024

Title:
  race_sched in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test will cause kernel panic on 6.8
  with Azure Standard_A2_v2 instance

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2068024/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068024] Re: race_sched in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test will cause kernel panic on 6.8 with Azure Standard_A2_v2 instance

2024-06-06 Thread John Cabaj
This issue was fixed by the following commit (upstream as of the 6.9
kernel):

1560d1f6eb6b398bddd80c16676776c0325fe5fe "sched/eevdf: Prevent vlag from
going out of bounds in reweight_eevdf()"

I've sent the patches to the mailing list for noble:linux
(https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2024-June/151360.html). I
left out other derivatives as they'll get them from noble:linux.
Oracular is tracking past the 6.9 kernel, so these patches should
already be applied there.

I've also attached the bisect logs for the break and fix commits, as
well as the script used to test (along with a patch to speed up
testing).

** Attachment added: "bisect log identifying break commit"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2068024/+attachment/5787032/+files/break_commit_bisect.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068024

Title:
  race_sched in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test will cause kernel panic on 6.8
  with Azure Standard_A2_v2 instance

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2068024/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068674] Re: ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
  Uploading ipython_8.20.0-1ubuntu1.dsc: done.
  Uploading ipython_8.20.0-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz: done.  
  Uploading ipython_8.20.0-1ubuntu1_source.buildinfo: done.
  Uploading ipython_8.20.0-1ubuntu1_source.changes: done.
Successfully uploaded packages.


** Changed in: ipython (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068674

Title:
  ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipython/+bug/2068674/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068659] Re: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
  Uploading protontricks_1.10.5-1ubuntu1.dsc: done.
  Uploading protontricks_1.10.5-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz: done.
  Uploading protontricks_1.10.5-1ubuntu1_source.buildinfo: done.
  Uploading protontricks_1.10.5-1ubuntu1_source.changes: done.
Successfully uploaded packages.


** Changed in: protontricks (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068659

Title:
  protontricks/1.10.5-1  vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protontricks/+bug/2068659/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068655] Re: net stable backport request for 24.04 lts

2024-06-06 Thread Matthew Ruffell
Hi Daniel,

Thanks for your contributions!

There's two ways we get patches into our Ubuntu kernels, the first is a LP bug
per patchset that ideally fixes one specific issue, has a testcase etc and then
we submit patches for review to the Ubuntu Kernel Mailing list.

The process is:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KernelUpdates
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/StablePatchFormat

The second is we take upstream stable patches and apply them wholesale.

I think the best way for you is to wait for them to be pulled in via upstream
stable. Looking at stable-queue from Greg KH and Sasha Levin:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-
queue.git/commit/?id=72b0cfbaddd2d041748637c1d9e69b83c1a99ec3

The netkit patches are already queued up, and will likely be in 6.9.4, which
will probably be applied in 2-3 months time, and your vxlan patch has yet to
reach stable-queue.

If you are in a hurry, I can help create SRU templates for you and format things
correctly. You just need to supply some justifications and testcases we can
verify.

Thanks,
Matthew

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068655

Title:
  net stable backport request for 24.04 lts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2068655/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068624] Re: Testing, please ignore

2024-06-06 Thread Daniel Letzeisen
** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068624

Title:
  Testing, please ignore

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/2068624/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068674] Re: ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Chris Peterson
Upstream had two relevant patches that fixed the issue which aren't in
the packaging yet. I went ahead and cherry-picked those changes. Please
see the provided debdiff.


PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/ipython

autopkgtest results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
oracular-cpete-
ipython/oracular/amd64/i/ipython/20240607_022230_1318f@/result.tar

** Patch added: "ipython_8.20.0-1_8.20.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipython/+bug/2068674/+attachment/5787007/+files/ipython_8.20.0-1_8.20.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068674

Title:
  ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipython/+bug/2068674/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068659] Re: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Chris Peterson
Second iteration. Patch contains full changes from the linked commit.

** Patch added: "1_protontricks_1.10.5-1_1.10.5-1ubuntu.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068659/+attachment/5787006/+files/1_protontricks_1.10.5-1_1.10.5-1ubuntu.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068659

Title:
  protontricks/1.10.5-1  vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protontricks/+bug/2068659/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 487720] Re: Restore fails with "Invalid data - SHA1 hash mismatch"

2024-06-06 Thread David Huggins-Daines
Okay! See https://gitlab.com/duplicity/duplicity/-/issues/824 for the
fix and a test script.

None of the previously mentioned workarounds  (from thirteen years ago!)
work.  --ignore-errors does nothing in the currently released version
due to a programming error.

** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/duplicity/duplicity/-/issues #824
   https://gitlab.com/duplicity/duplicity/-/issues/824

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487720

Title:
  Restore fails with "Invalid data - SHA1 hash mismatch"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/487720/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061091] Re: Freezing user space processes failed after 20.008 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0)

2024-06-06 Thread GuoqingJiang
SRU Justification

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061091

[Impact]
User reports that laptop gets stuck on the console screen when trying to
shut down or suspend laptop.

[Fix]
Focal: backport form bb9b0e46b84 due to different context.
Jammy and Mantic: cherry-pick from bb9b0e46b84.
Noble: stable v6.8.12 includes the fix by 88ce3fe255d5.

[Test case]
No specific test case from our side since this bug was reported by customer.

[Regression Potential]
It could affect PM relevant actions.

Takashi Iwai (1):
  ALSA: Fix deadlocks with kctl removals at disconnection

 sound/core/init.c | 9 -
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => jammy-updates

** Also affects: linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => GuoqingJiang (guoqingjiang)

** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu Jammy)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => GuoqingJiang (guoqingjiang)

** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu Mantic)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => GuoqingJiang (guoqingjiang)

** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu Focal)
Milestone: None => focal-updates

** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu Jammy)
Milestone: None => jammy-updates

** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu Mantic)
Milestone: None => mantic-updates

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061091

Title:
  Freezing user space processes failed after 20.008 seconds (1 tasks
  refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-6.5/+bug/2061091/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

2024-06-06 Thread heynnema
@mitchdz

The blog at https://adriano.ws/fixing-updates-detected-log-freshclam-
daemon-error/ describes the exact situation... but it doesn't fix the
problem... but the idea puts it into probably one of the correct areas
to examine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608

Title:
  clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068672] Re: ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
  Uploading ipykernel_6.29.3-1ubuntu1.dsc: done.
  Uploading ipykernel_6.29.3-1ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz: done.
  Uploading ipykernel_6.29.3-1ubuntu1_source.buildinfo: done.
  Uploading ipykernel_6.29.3-1ubuntu1_source.changes: done.
Successfully uploaded packages.


** Changed in: ipykernel (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068672

Title:
  ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipykernel/+bug/2068672/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068623] Re: Problems after an upgrade

2024-06-06 Thread Daniel van Vugt
After you replace the hard drive I would recommend installing Ubuntu
20.04 again because that's the last release to contain the correct
Nvidia driver version 340 required for your GeForce 8400 GS card.

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068623

Title:
  Problems after an upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2068623/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

2024-06-06 Thread heynnema
@mitchdz

You're missing one step in your comment #4.

A clam database update must occur at least once, for the freshclam.log
to get populated.

systemctl status clamav-freshclam

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608

Title:
  clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068674] Re: ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: ipython (Debian)
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068674

Title:
  ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipython/+bug/2068674/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

2024-06-06 Thread heynnema
@mitchdz You're partially correct.

clamav-freshclam.service updates the clam database, and updates the
/var/log/clamav/freshclam.log.

logwatch does nothing to update "it". It only reviews the freshclam.log
file, looking for certain markers, to indicate that updates occurred, or
if there were any errors.

I had added the recent freshclam.log file as an attachment when I
created the bug report. Please see it there.

I believe that either one of two things has happened...

1. Since clamav changed from a 0.98 version, to a 1.0.x version, the
file format of freshclam.log has changed, and logwatch 7.x can no longer
properly decipher it.

2. logwatch was updated to 7.7, from 7.5, and they didn't update the
scripts for the clam-update portion.

Let me know if you need more.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608

Title:
  clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068623] Re: Problems after an upgrade

2024-06-06 Thread Daniel van Vugt
I can see two issues here that might explain "system gets jammed":

(a) sda (The Western Digital 80GB hard disk) is experiencing hardware
errors which can cause long freezes.

(b) nouveau doesn't have adequate firmware which can cause freezes
(actually nouveau can cause freezes regardless).

Please consider replacing the Western Digital hard disk first. Then log
new bugs for each problem you encounter because we cannot handle
multiple issues in a single bug report.

** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068623

Title:
  Problems after an upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2068623/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2048696] Re: Desktop occasionally starts in overview if hotcorner enabled

2024-06-06 Thread Daniel van Vugt
It can also happen if you accidentally press the Super (Windows) key.

** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048696

Title:
  Desktop occasionally starts in overview if hotcorner enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/2048696/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067897] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 does not install resolvconf uses systemd-resolved instead which is broken

2024-06-06 Thread John Orr
FYI - Tobias wasn't keen on the dummy interface option, per his response here 
https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan/discussions/2085#discussioncomment-9678750
(though maybe that is a good option, but dnsmasq needs to be changed to suit 
it?)

I also hit a problem where a server I wish to access over the VPN also
has an IP address on the public internet - and whereas with the old
resolvconf executable, somehow starting the VPN used to automatically
switch me to using the VPN version of that server, using a dummy
interface this didn't happen - it kept using the public ip address for
this server.  By setting iface in /etc/strongswan.d/charon/resolve.conf
to my ethernet interface, it replaced the public DNS (1.1.1.1) on that
interface with my VPN DNS servers, so things worked.  Unfortunately,
when the VPN went down, it didn't restore 1.1.1.1 (and I'd hoped might
be possible with the resolvectl "revert" command - alas no) - it just
removed all DNS on that link.

I've almost zero knowledge in this space compared to Tobias, Lennart,
etc - but it certainly feels like stuff that just worked with the old
resolvconf has become quite the headache now - even if the new
resolvectl resolvconf is better for a bunch of other reasons.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067897

Title:
  Ubuntu 24.04 does not install resolvconf uses systemd-resolved instead
  which is broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2067897/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064037] Re: GDM session crashes after returning from a screen-off.

2024-06-06 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Luke, you have the wrong bug. That's bug 2050865.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064037

Title:
  gnome-shell crashes with SIGSEGV in tilingWindowManager.js:99

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2064037/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064037] Re: GDM session crashes after returning from a screen-off.

2024-06-06 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Jon, thanks. I can see your recurring crash is a segfault in:

  #0   653db2ce7fb8 i   
file:///usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/tiling-assist...@ubuntu.com/src/extension/tilingWindowManager.js:99
 (2e2d19d6b790 @ 78)
  #1   653db2ce7ee0 i   
file:///usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/tiling-assist...@ubuntu.com/src/extension/tilingWindowManager.js:1303
 (2e2d19d74380 @ 95)
  #2   653db2ce7e58 i   
file:///usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/tiling-assist...@ubuntu.com/src/extension/tilingWindowManager.js:437
 (2e2d19d6bba0 @ 17)

so hopefully you can work around it with:

  gnome-extensions disable tiling-assist...@ubuntu.com

and then log in again.


** Summary changed:

- GDM session crashes after returning from a screen-off.
+ gnome-shell crashes with SIGSEGV in tilingWindowManager.js:99

** Package changed: ubuntu => gnome-shell (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

** Also affects: gnome-shell-extension-tiling-assistant (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064037

Title:
  gnome-shell crashes with SIGSEGV in tilingWindowManager.js:99

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2064037/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064037] Re: gnome-shell crashes with SIGSEGV in tilingWindowManager.js:99

2024-06-06 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Jon, it looks like simpledrm is also a factor for you due to Nvidia, so
please also try the workarounds mentioned in bug  2060268.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064037

Title:
  gnome-shell crashes with SIGSEGV in tilingWindowManager.js:99

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2064037/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068672] Re: ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Chris Peterson
Indeed it was just the nose-style tests. Upstream has unreleased changes
to address this that I cherry-picked. Please see the attached debdiff.


PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/ipykernel

Autopkgtest results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
oracular-cpete-
ipykernel/oracular/amd64/i/ipykernel/20240607_003157_a0a72@/log.gz

** Patch added: "ipykernel_6.29.3-1_6.29.3-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipykernel/+bug/2068672/+attachment/5787001/+files/ipykernel_6.29.3-1_6.29.3-1ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068672

Title:
  ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipykernel/+bug/2068672/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056578] Re: [SRU - Noble] Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning

2024-06-06 Thread Thomas Ward
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  Due to various changes in AppArmor, and the AppArmor policy for Tor Browser 
installed by the launcher, the default ibus/dbus abstractions don't include 
user-space access to DBUS/IBUS.
  
  This results in Tor Browser being unable to read keyboard input in
  userspace, resulting in a Non-Functional application.  While Tor Browser
  *launcher* still works, the underlying Tor Browser inherits the AppArmor
  profile from torbrowser-launcher, hence this needs updated here.
  
  [Test Plan]
  This fix has already been tested and implemented in Debian upstream.  
However, it was not available before FeatureFreeze, and was not available in 
Debian until post-Noble release.
  
  This has already been tested manually by others, but as soon as a
  version with the patch present is available, a user should install the
  updated torbrowser-launcher package and the updated AppArmor profile
  should apply, and the program should work as usual.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  Extremely limited.  This simply allows access to userspace dbus/ibus access 
for Keyboard input.
  
  Note that this exact same line being added to the AppArmor profile here
  exists in the Firefox AppArmor ruleset as well, and since Tor Browser
  and Firefox share much of the same code, this should have limited to no
  impact as this has existed in Firefox for a long time.
  
+ [Where problems could occur]
+ 
+ The only thing that might happen is extra access to dbus/ibus interfaces
+ for input handling.  However, as this change being added by SRU is
+ already in the Firefox apparmor profile, this shouldn't cause any
+ issues.
+ 
+ 
  [Other Info]
  This is already available in Debian Unstable, and also in Oracular due to the 
sync.
  
  Simon Quigley is handling the upload and prep of the SRU debdiff to
  noble-updates as a favor to Thomas Ward who is having computer scuff at
  the time of the uploading.
- 
  
  [Original Description]
  
  I have installed tor browser v13.0.11 on 24.04 (noble). The keyboard
  does not operate, when typing no characters are appearing.
  
  I have tried to enter a search and also type in a URL but this is not
  working.
  
  I am using default Ubuntu desktop with wayland.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
  Package: torbrowser-launcher 0.3.7-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4
  Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Mar  8 16:01:36 2024
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-08 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240306)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   TERM=xterm-256color
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  SourcePackage: torbrowser-launcher
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056578

Title:
  [SRU - Noble] Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser-launcher/+bug/2056578/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067664] Re: libcgroup should upgrade to v3.1.0

2024-06-06 Thread Serge Hallyn
(Sorry, I see the debbug now)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067664

Title:
  libcgroup should upgrade to v3.1.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcgroup/+bug/2067664/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067664] Re: libcgroup should upgrade to v3.1.0

2024-06-06 Thread Serge Hallyn
Hm, email to the listed debian maintainer bounced:

: host
dns.imt-atlantique.fr[192.44.76.66] said: 550 5.1.1
... User unknown (in reply to RCPT
TO command)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067664

Title:
  libcgroup should upgrade to v3.1.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcgroup/+bug/2067664/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056578] Re: Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning

2024-06-06 Thread Thomas Ward
** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ Due to various changes in AppArmor, and the AppArmor policy for Tor Browser 
installed by the launcher, the default ibus/dbus abstractions don't include 
user-space access to DBUS/IBUS.
+ 
+ This results in Tor Browser being unable to read keyboard input in
+ userspace, resulting in a Non-Functional application.  While Tor Browser
+ *launcher* still works, the underlying Tor Browser inherits the AppArmor
+ profile from torbrowser-launcher, hence this needs updated here.
+ 
+ [Test Plan]
+ This fix has already been tested and implemented in Debian upstream.  
However, it was not available before FeatureFreeze, and was not available in 
Debian until post-Noble release.
+ 
+ This has already been tested manually by others, but as soon as a
+ version with the patch present is available, a user should install the
+ updated torbrowser-launcher package and the updated AppArmor profile
+ should apply, and the program should work as usual.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ Extremely limited.  This simply allows access to userspace dbus/ibus access 
for Keyboard input.
+ 
+ Note that this exact same line being added to the AppArmor profile here
+ exists in the Firefox AppArmor ruleset as well, and since Tor Browser
+ and Firefox share much of the same code, this should have limited to no
+ impact as this has existed in Firefox for a long time.
+ 
+ [Other Info]
+ This is already available in Debian Unstable, and also in Oracular due to the 
sync.
+ 
+ Simon Quigley is handling the upload and prep of the SRU debdiff to
+ noble-updates as a favor to Thomas Ward who is having computer scuff at
+ the time of the uploading.
+ 
+ 
+ [Original Description]
+ 
  I have installed tor browser v13.0.11 on 24.04 (noble). The keyboard
  does not operate, when typing no characters are appearing.
  
  I have tried to enter a search and also type in a URL but this is not
  working.
  
  I am using default Ubuntu desktop with wayland.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
  Package: torbrowser-launcher 0.3.7-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4
  Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Mar  8 16:01:36 2024
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-08 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240306)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   TERM=xterm-256color
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
  SourcePackage: torbrowser-launcher
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Changed in: torbrowser-launcher (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Summary changed:

- Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning
+ [SRU - Noble] Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056578

Title:
  [SRU - Noble] Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser-launcher/+bug/2056578/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068659] Re: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "protontricks_1.10.5-1_1.10.5-1ubuntu.debdiff" seems to
be a debdiff.  The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug
report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff.  If
the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the
attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are member of the
~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe the team.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by
~brian-murray, for any issue please contact him.]

** Tags added: patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068659

Title:
  protontricks/1.10.5-1  vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protontricks/+bug/2068659/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068675] [NEW] Ubuntu Pro icon is not scaled in HiDPI

2024-06-06 Thread Treviño
Public bug reported:

See attached screenshot (at 4x)

** Affects: gnome-initial-setup (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: In Progress

** Attachment added: "Schermata del 2024-06-07 02-19-05.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068675/+attachment/5787000/+files/Schermata%20del%202024-06-07%2002-19-05.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068675

Title:
  Ubuntu Pro icon is not scaled in HiDPI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-initial-setup/+bug/2068675/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056578] Re: Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning

2024-06-06 Thread Thomas Ward
Fixed in Oracular by a sync from Debian.

Because my system is being derp with signing keys and uploads, I've
enlisted another Ubuntu Developer to handle the SRU debdiff.

** Also affects: torbrowser-launcher (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: Confirmed

** Also affects: torbrowser-launcher (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: torbrowser-launcher (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: torbrowser-launcher (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056578

Title:
  Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser-launcher/+bug/2056578/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067338] Re: [SRU] Long SysEx messages are skipped by Midi-Bridge

2024-06-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Unsubscribing sponsors, Simon Quigley handled new upload.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067338

Title:
  [SRU] Long SysEx messages are skipped by Midi-Bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pipewire/+bug/2067338/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059847] Re: Input lag or freezes on Nvidia desktops with X11 after logging "MetaSyncRing: Sync object is not ready -- were events handled properly?"

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mutter - 42.9-0ubuntu8

---
mutter (42.9-0ubuntu8) jammy; urgency=medium

  [ Daniel van Vugt ]
  * Add fullscreen-maximize to tests-Tag-unstable-tests-as-flaky.patch
  * Add compositor-sync-ring-Allow-the-gpu_fence-to-be-moved.patch to
fix lag and freezes on the Nvidia Xorg driver (LP: #2059847)

  [ Marco Trevisan (Treviño) ]
  * debian/patches: Refresh git indexes
  * debian/patches: Add fix to handle crash on destruction of invalid popups
(LP: #2065066)

 -- Marco Trevisan (Treviño)   Tue, 07 May 2024
16:40:12 +0200

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059847

Title:
  Input lag or freezes on Nvidia desktops with X11 after logging
  "MetaSyncRing: Sync object is not ready -- were events handled
  properly?"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2059847/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2065066] Re: gnome-shell crashes in meta_wayland_popup_grab_get_top_popup

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mutter - 42.9-0ubuntu8

---
mutter (42.9-0ubuntu8) jammy; urgency=medium

  [ Daniel van Vugt ]
  * Add fullscreen-maximize to tests-Tag-unstable-tests-as-flaky.patch
  * Add compositor-sync-ring-Allow-the-gpu_fence-to-be-moved.patch to
fix lag and freezes on the Nvidia Xorg driver (LP: #2059847)

  [ Marco Trevisan (Treviño) ]
  * debian/patches: Refresh git indexes
  * debian/patches: Add fix to handle crash on destruction of invalid popups
(LP: #2065066)

 -- Marco Trevisan (Treviño)   Tue, 07 May 2024
16:40:12 +0200

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065066

Title:
  gnome-shell crashes in meta_wayland_popup_grab_get_top_popup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2065066/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068672] Re: ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: ipykernel (Debian)
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068672

Title:
  ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipykernel/+bug/2068672/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068674] [NEW] ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Chris Peterson
Public bug reported:

ipython's autopkgtests fail against pytest 8+ since the upstream support
changes haven't been packaged yet.

https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest-
oracular/oracular/amd64/i/ipython/20240606_104942_0c45c@/log.gz

** Affects: ipython (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete)
 Status: New

** Affects: pytest (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: ipython (Debian)
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown


** Tags: update-excuse

** Tags removed: update-e
** Tags added: update-excuse

** Changed in: ipython (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris Peterson (cpete)

** Also affects: pytest (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1063945
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063945

** Also affects: ipython (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063945
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068674

Title:
  ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipython/+bug/2068674/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066026] Re: [SRU] Klayout 0.28.15 segmentation fault on startup

2024-06-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
I have sponsored the fix for this package by uploading this package to
noble-proposed UNAPPROVED awaiting approval from the Ubuntu Stable
Release Updates team. Subsequently, I have unsubscribed the Ubuntu
Sponsors Team as the upload has now been sponsored and awaits SRU
approval.

For more information about this process, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066026

Title:
  [SRU] Klayout 0.28.15 segmentation fault on startup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klayout/+bug/2066026/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059847] Update Released

2024-06-06 Thread Brian Murray
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059847

Title:
  Input lag or freezes on Nvidia desktops with X11 after logging
  "MetaSyncRing: Sync object is not ready -- were events handled
  properly?"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2059847/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2065066] Update Released

2024-06-06 Thread Brian Murray
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.  In
the event that you encounter a regression using the package from
-updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065066

Title:
  gnome-shell crashes in meta_wayland_popup_grab_get_top_popup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2065066/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059847] Re: Input lag or freezes on Nvidia desktops with X11 after logging "MetaSyncRing: Sync object is not ready -- were events handled properly?"

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mutter - 45.2-0ubuntu5

---
mutter (45.2-0ubuntu5) mantic; urgency=medium

  * Replace tests-Disable-restore-size-test.patch with
Mark-several-additional-tests-as-flaky.patch from Debian to avoid
wasting time on rebuilds for known flaky test cases.
  * Add compositor-sync-ring-Allow-the-gpu_fence-to-be-moved.patch to
fix lag and freezes on the Nvidia Xorg driver (LP: #2059847)

 -- Daniel van Vugt   Mon, 08 Apr 2024
17:47:26 +0800

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059847

Title:
  Input lag or freezes on Nvidia desktops with X11 after logging
  "MetaSyncRing: Sync object is not ready -- were events handled
  properly?"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2059847/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067338] Re: [SRU] Long SysEx messages are skipped by Midi-Bridge

2024-06-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Patch removed: "pipewire_1.0.5-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pipewire/+bug/2067338/+attachment/5783484/+files/pipewire_1.0.5-1ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067338

Title:
  [SRU] Long SysEx messages are skipped by Midi-Bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pipewire/+bug/2067338/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067338] Re: [SRU] Long SysEx messages are skipped by Midi-Bridge

2024-06-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Working with Andreas Hasenack, we determined that the larger of the two
included patches was actually not included in the code of 1.0.7 and
after testing I found out it was not needed. For that reason, I'm
uploading a new .debdiff and this will need another upload.

** Patch added: "pipewire_1.0.5-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pipewire/+bug/2067338/+attachment/5786973/+files/pipewire_1.0.5-1ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067338

Title:
  [SRU] Long SysEx messages are skipped by Midi-Bridge

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pipewire/+bug/2067338/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067579] Re: Webcam not working

2024-06-06 Thread Kai-Chuan Hsieh
Check the $ dkms status to see if the module was recorded by it, and see
if there is source under /usr/src. Follow the dkms manual to remove it.

Also, you can try remove the folder
/lib/modules/6.5.0-1023-oem/updates/dkms/ directly and run $ sudo depmod
-a again. Then do the reboot, to see if the module info gets update.

I don't suggest to install any dkms on certified platform. Because it
will prevent you to enable secure boot if you don't know how to sign it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067579

Title:
  Webcam not working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oem-somerville-tentacool-rpl-meta/+bug/2067579/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068672] Re: ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Chris Peterson
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1047471
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1047471

** Also affects: ipykernel (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1047471
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** No longer affects: ipykernel (Debian)

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1070112
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070112

** Also affects: ipykernel (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070112
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068672

Title:
  ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipykernel/+bug/2068672/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068604] Re: full-upgrade cause gnome crashes

2024-06-06 Thread Chris Guiver
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.

Bug reporting is about finding & fixing problems thus preventing future
users from hitting the same bug.

I suspect a Support site would be more appropriate, eg.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu. You can also find help with your
problem in the support forum of your local Ubuntu community
http://loco.ubuntu.com/ or asking at https://askubuntu.com or
https://ubuntuforums.org, or for more support options please look at
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/community-support/709

(  You've filed this bug report against the ubuntu-release-upgrader
package, which would release-upgrade a 24.04 release to Ubuntu 24.10,
however there is no evidence that you've attempted that release-upgrade.
You can convert this bug report into a question, questions being aimed
at support, but gnome is not involved in upgrading a system to a later
release )

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068604

Title:
   full-upgrade cause gnome crashes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2068604/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068672] [NEW] ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Chris Peterson
Public bug reported:

ipykernel's autopkgtests are failing with pytest 8.2.2-1

A sample error:

162s === FAILURES 
===
162s  test_asyncio_interrupt 

162s 
162s @pytest.mark.skipif(tornado.version_info < (5,), reason="only relevant 
on tornado 5")
162s def test_asyncio_interrupt():
162s >   assert KM is not None
162s E   assert None is not None
162s 
162s tests/test_eventloop.py:67: AssertionError


After an initial look, it looks like some of tests rely on the nose-style test 
setup which is causing at least some of the errors.

** Affects: ipykernel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete)
 Status: New

** Affects: pytest (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: ipykernel (Debian)
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown


** Tags: update-excuse

** Also affects: pytest (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068672

Title:
  ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipykernel/+bug/2068672/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066908] Autopkgtest regression report (ovn/24.03.2-0ubuntu0.24.04.1)

2024-06-06 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ovn (24.03.2-0ubuntu0.24.04.1) for 
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

ovn/24.03.2-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 (amd64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#ovn

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066908

Title:
  [SRU] ovn 24.03.2 point release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+bug/2066908/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2029314] Re: [SRU] Hexchat crashes whenever I click on a specific link in a channel

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package hexchat - 2.16.1-1ubuntu0.1

---
hexchat (2.16.1-1ubuntu0.1) mantic; urgency=medium

  * Fix hexchat crash for specific links. (LP: #2029314)

 -- Sudip Mukherjee   Thu, 22 Feb 2024
21:45:04 +

** Changed in: hexchat (Ubuntu Mantic)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029314

Title:
  [SRU] Hexchat crashes whenever I click on a specific link in a channel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hexchat-irc/+bug/2029314/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063257] Re: Noble: default pam config for login tries do load non-existent pam_lastlog.so

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060676 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060676

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063257

Title:
  Noble: default pam config for login tries do load non-existent
  pam_lastlog.so

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/2063257/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063257] Re: Noble: default pam config for login tries do load non-existent pam_lastlog.so

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060676 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060676

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063257

Title:
  Noble: default pam config for login tries do load non-existent
  pam_lastlog.so

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shadow/+bug/2063257/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068558] Re: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Simon Quigley
Uploaded your most recent debdiff, thanks!

Please also send this up to Debian, since the package is in sync.

** Changed in: python-dtcwt (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068558

Title:
  python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-dtcwt/+bug/2068558/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066026] Re: [SRU] Klayout 0.28.15 segmentation fault on startup

2024-06-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ 
+ Klayout 0.28.15 is completely incompatible with Python 3.12, and
+ segfaults on startup. Included patches attempted to increase the
+ supported version number, but the code itself was incompatible and it
+ simply would not run.
+ 
+ Attempts to include a simple patch from upstream proved unsuccessful and
+ resulted in a complete FTBFS. This was due to the shifting of code in
+ other places prior to the commits of the patch, meaning the patch was
+ irrelevant without other pieces of code changed. Hence, the first
+ version of klayout that supported Python 3.12 was 0.28.16, released on
+ 12 February 2024. Unfortunately, it was not uploaded to Debian prior to
+ Feature Freeze/Debian Import Freeze, so it did not make it in-time.
+ 
+ As reported by the reporter of this bug, no testing on the runtime was
+ done prior to release. So, while the build was successful, runs are
+ reproducibly unsuccessful. This package is, therefore, completely
+ useless in the archive as it stands unless it is updated to version
+ 0.28.16.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ 
+ * Install klayout
+ * Attempt to run klayout
+ 
+ Expected: Application runs
+ Actual: Segmentation fault
+ 
+ [What could go wrong]
+ 
+ Looking into this application, it seems to be a Suggests of electronics-
+ asic-dev which is a metapackage for asic development, which installs
+ applications much like itself, i.e. for electronics engineers and others
+ who build electronic circuits. It doesn't appear to enhance any other
+ packages, meaning it has no *actual* reverse dependencies, nor does it
+ provide any libraries.
+ 
+ It's hard to regress an application that simply does not function, and
+ considering it has no actual reverse dependencies, I'm having trouble
+ fathoming anything going wrong here other than 0.28.16 also failing to
+ run with further updates. :)
+ 
+ [Other Information]
+ 
+ While this is a point release and does concentrate on bug fixes, it does
+ include some "enhancements" as they're called on the changelog[1] that
+ may or may not be considered "features":
+ 
+ * Enhancement: DRC enhancements related to touching edges
+  - New DRC function switches: "without_touching_corners", 
"without_touching_edges" to skip width and space errors at kissing corners and 
touching-edge configurations
+  - Kissing corners are now detected also in non-collinear edge configuration
+ * Enhancement: OASIS reader errors out on broken OASIS with duplicate 
CELLNAMEs
+ 
+ While including features would normally require a Feature Freeze
+ exception or a backport, I would argue against it in this case as the
+ version in the development release of Ubuntu at this time is 0.29.1
+ which is magnitudes newer and definitely, per the changelog[2] contains
+ many new features.
+ 
+ Other options, such as simply patching for Python 3.12, have been
+ exhausted. No-change rebuilds also proved to be ineffective. Moving up
+ one point release as opposed to moving to the latest release seemed to
+ be the best compromise. Apologies for the diff being so large but,
+ unfortunately, carrying patches to make  0.28.15 Python 3.12 compatible
+ would have been more time-consuming and created a diff nearly as large.
+ 
+ [1]https://www.klayout.de/development.html#0.28.16
+ [2]https://www.klayout.de/development.html#0.29.1
+ ---
+ Original bug report follows:
+ 
  On Ubuntu 24.04, Klayout 0.28.15-1build5 crashes on startup.
  
  This is due to a bug described in the upstream issue
  https://github.com/KLayout/klayout/issues/1619, which shows up on
  systems using Python 3.12.
  
  This bug was fixed in Klayout versions >=0.28.16.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066026

Title:
  [SRU] Klayout 0.28.15 segmentation fault on startup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klayout/+bug/2066026/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064751] Re: [SRU] revert security-regression in Focal's libcrypto++

2024-06-06 Thread Mark Esler
Andreas asked that I re-verify that Ubuntu Security wishes to make this
change through SRU. We do.

Since the regression was inherited from sid, it feels most appropriate
to SRU a change into -updates. Also, since a working 5.6 patch for
CVE-2019-14318 does not exist we do not have a fix for the security
pocket.

This SRU needs a sponsor.

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2019-14318

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064751

Title:
  [SRU] revert security-regression in Focal's libcrypto++

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2064751/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064751] Re: [SRU] revert security-regression in Focal's libcrypto++

2024-06-06 Thread Mark Esler
Marking this as invalid, since devel is not affected. Only focal is
affected.

** Package changed: libcrypto++ (Ubuntu) => ubuntu

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064751

Title:
  [SRU] revert security-regression in Focal's libcrypto++

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2064751/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067683] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS on RPI 5 8GB [SUPER SLOW]

2024-06-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067683

Title:
  Ubuntu 24.04 LTS on RPI 5 8GB [SUPER SLOW]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2067683/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068667] [NEW] Random system crashes leading to total unresponsiveness.

2024-06-06 Thread Mosbeh Hamdi
Public bug reported:

sudo dmesg -w | grep -i nvme
[1.493218] nvme nvme0: pci function :04:00.0
[1.584004] nvme nvme0: allocated 128 MiB host memory buffer.
[1.588152] nvme nvme0: 4/0/0 default/read/poll queues
[1.590662]  nvme0n1: p1 p2 p3
[4.922984] EXT4-fs (nvme0n1p3): mounted filesystem 
c8007896-146e-4289-a61e-d85bee589327 ro with ordered data mode. Quota mode: 
none.
[5.298291] block nvme0n1: the capability attribute has been deprecated.
[5.503952] EXT4-fs (nvme0n1p3): re-mounted 
c8007896-146e-4289-a61e-d85bee589327 r/w. Quota mode: none.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: linux-image-6.5.0-35-generic 6.5.0-35.35~22.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-35.35~22.04.1-generic 6.5.13
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-35-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu Jun  6 22:44:16 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-07 (91 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 22.04.3 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20230807.1)
SourcePackage: linux-signed-hwe-6.5
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: linux-signed-hwe-6.5 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068667

Title:
  Random system crashes leading to total unresponsiveness.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-6.5/+bug/2068667/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066026] Re: [SRU] Klayout 0.28.15 segmentation fault on startup

2024-06-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
** Summary changed:

- Klayout 0.28.15 segmentation fault on startup
+ [SRU] Klayout 0.28.15 segmentation fault on startup

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066026

Title:
  [SRU] Klayout 0.28.15 segmentation fault on startup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klayout/+bug/2066026/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059097] Re: [SRU] ovn 22.03.7 point release

2024-06-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The upload in jammy-unapproved[1] contains patches for two other lp
bugs:

+  * d/p/lp-2060941.patch: Cherry-pick fix for CoPP system test.
+  * d/p/lp-2065269.patch: Cherry-pick fix for ACL after lb tests.

Why are these bugs not part of the SRU? They are not being referred in
the d/changelog, and also do not have the SRU template filled in.

1.
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/730609891/ovn_22.03.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1_source.changes

** Changed in: ovn (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059097

Title:
  [SRU] ovn 22.03.7 point release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2059097/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068558] Re: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Chris Peterson
I've forwarded the patch to upstream. Please see the new debdiff with
the updated patch header.

** Patch added: "1_python-dtcwt_0.12.0-5_0.12.0-5ubuntu1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-dtcwt/+bug/2068558/+attachment/5786920/+files/1_python-dtcwt_0.12.0-5_0.12.0-5ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068558

Title:
  python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-dtcwt/+bug/2068558/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066026] Re: Klayout 0.28.15 segmentation fault on startup

2024-06-06 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
Attempted a no-change rebuild without the patch. Predictably, it built,
but segfaulted upon run due to the Python 3.12 incompatibility.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066026

Title:
  Klayout 0.28.15 segmentation fault on startup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klayout/+bug/2066026/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066908] Re: [SRU] ovn 24.03.2 point release

2024-06-06 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hello Frode, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ovn into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/24.03.2-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: ovn (Ubuntu Noble)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066908

Title:
  [SRU] ovn 24.03.2 point release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ovn/+bug/2066908/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068659] Re: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Chris Peterson
Please see the attached debiff.

PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/protontricks/

Autopkgtest results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
oracular-cpete-
protontricks/oracular/amd64/p/protontricks/20240606_203154_a25f9@/log.gz

** Patch added: "protontricks_1.10.5-1_1.10.5-1ubuntu.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068659/+attachment/5786919/+files/protontricks_1.10.5-1_1.10.5-1ubuntu.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068659

Title:
  protontricks/1.10.5-1  vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protontricks/+bug/2068659/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
No, Version 0.9.4 is not planned to be backported to Jammy. Big updates
like these do not happen often to stable releases.

To get this fixed, the specific bug will be narrowed down and just the
fix itself will need to be backported. I'd be glad to do some
investigation on what other commits may look like the fix if you are
able to test them out.

Alternatively, do you have steps to reproduce this issue? I can
investigate it more in my testbed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286

Title:
  Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using
  Multipath

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 487720] Re: Restore fails with "Invalid data - SHA1 hash mismatch"

2024-06-06 Thread David Huggins-Daines
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487720

Title:
  Restore fails with "Invalid data - SHA1 hash mismatch"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/487720/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-06-06 Thread Ninoy Radhakrishnan
Hi Mitchell, will you be able to add the full multipath 0.9.4 packages
to the fix.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286

Title:
  Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using
  Multipath

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068615] Re: kernel oops in pick_next_task_fair in 6.8.1-1002-realtime kernel

2024-06-06 Thread Kevin Becker
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-realtime

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068615

Title:
   kernel oops in pick_next_task_fair  in 6.8.1-1002-realtime kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-realtime/+bug/2068615/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2057687] Re: systemctl hibernate error: "Call to Hibernate failed: Invalid argument"

2024-06-06 Thread mash
I added the line "blacklist intel_hid" to /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf
and then ran

sudo update-grub
sudo update-initramfs -c -k all

and now hibernate works again (mostly -- hibernate works with "systemctl
hibernate" and with closing the lid, but hibernate does not work with
selecting hibernate from the gnome Power Off menu).

I would be grateful for an explanation but I seem to be back in business
in terms of hibernation.  Thank you @xstack

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057687

Title:
  systemctl hibernate error: "Call to Hibernate failed: Invalid
  argument"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2057687/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068659] Re: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1

2024-06-06 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: protontricks (Debian)
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068659

Title:
  protontricks/1.10.5-1  vs pytest/8.2.2-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protontricks/+bug/2068659/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 487720] Re: Restore fails with "Invalid data - SHA1 hash mismatch"

2024-06-06 Thread David Huggins-Daines
In my case it turns out that two of the volumes were truncated somehow.
Not sure if this is the sort of filesystem corruption that can occur
when a removable volume is disconnected without unmounting it, but that
would probably make sense.

Unfortunately the deja-dup GUI has no way to recover from this problem
and gives you no options on how to skip the affected files, it just
reports the difftar file name which is less than helpful.  I had to go
decrypt and look through the manifest as noted above to figure out which
files needed to be skipped when restoring (in this case, there was only
one file, a very large audio recording that was thankfully backed up
elsewhere).

Nor does duplicity or deja-dup do anything to detect that this problem
might exist when adding incremental backups (the truncated volumes were
in a full backup from two months ago with several incrementals since).

In the appears that I can restore from the command line (the links in a
comment above from *thirteen years ago* are obviously no longer valid)
using the --exclude option to duplicity.  Truly deja-dup is an overly
simplified GUI, having some options and robustness is not a luxury when
dealing with important data.

Amazing that neither of these pieces of software seem to have improved
since then.  Perhaps backups aren't important to developers?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487720

Title:
  Restore fails with "Invalid data - SHA1 hash mismatch"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/487720/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1728031] Autopkgtest regression report (horizon/4:22.1.1-0ubuntu1.1)

2024-06-06 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted horizon (4:22.1.1-0ubuntu1.1) for jammy 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

heat-dashboard/unknown (arm64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/jammy/update_excuses.html#horizon

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728031

Title:
  [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is
  True

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1728031/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054799] Autopkgtest regression report (horizon/4:22.1.1-0ubuntu1.1)

2024-06-06 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted horizon (4:22.1.1-0ubuntu1.1) for jammy 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

heat-dashboard/unknown (arm64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/jammy/update_excuses.html#horizon

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054799

Title:
  [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2054799/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2055409] Autopkgtest regression report (horizon/4:22.1.1-0ubuntu1.1)

2024-06-06 Thread Ubuntu SRU Bot
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted horizon (4:22.1.1-0ubuntu1.1) for jammy 
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

heat-dashboard/unknown (arm64)


Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, 
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding 
autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/jammy/update_excuses.html#horizon

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055409

Title:
  [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply
  to instance detail page

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2055409/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-06 Thread Bryce Harrington
Given that we're at LTS+1, this would seem to be a good point for a re-
think on this piece of delta.  I also think Dominic makes good points in
comments #43 and #45, and the course of action seems logical to me as
well.  The delta's been proving time-intensive to maintain, and changes
upstream not in our control are limiting what auto-detect functionality
can be done.

It may be helpful (and perhaps more maintainable), to improve the Exim4
docs in the Ubuntu Server Guide to describe how to do the SPF
configuration manually.  Here's the current docs:

https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/install-and-configure-exim4/11530

We should also ensure this gains an entry in the Release Notes for
Oracular, whatever approach is taken.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-06 Thread Dominic
Option three would be to remove the spf section completely until a non-
broken sustainable solution is implemented, especially if libspf2 is
going to take some time to implement.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

Title:
  Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >