[Bug 2066990] Re: openssl fails with out of memory messages while trying to load the FIPS provider in a non-FIPS container on a FIPS host
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ca-certificates (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Nader (adrien) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066990 Title: openssl fails with out of memory messages while trying to load the FIPS provider in a non-FIPS container on a FIPS host To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/2066990/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066990] Re: high memory consumption in Ubuntu Noble
NB: we can only SRU that to Noble if it first goes in a development version of Ubuntu which will only be possible when development for 25.04 begins. ** Summary changed: - high memory consumption in Ubuntu Noble + openssl fails with out of memory messages while trying to load the FIPS provider in a non-FIPS container on a FIPS host ** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066990 Title: openssl fails with out of memory messages while trying to load the FIPS provider in a non-FIPS container on a FIPS host To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/2066990/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066990] Re: high memory consumption in Ubuntu Noble
Steps to reproduce on any machine on Noble or later: cp -r /usr/lib/ssl/certs/ . OPENSSL_FORCE_FIPS_MODE=1 openssl rehash certs ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066990 Title: openssl fails with out of memory messages while trying to load the FIPS provider in a non-FIPS container on a FIPS host To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/2066990/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066990] Re: high memory consumption in Ubuntu Noble
** Also affects: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066990 Title: high memory consumption in Ubuntu Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/2066990/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079834] Re: libssh2-1 lacks support for rsa-sha2-{512,256}
I'm wary of version upgrades for packages I'm not sure we've done SRUs
before.
Have you considered using ssh-audit? It can tell you which host-key
algorithms are offered and I think it implements just enough of the SSH
protocol so that it can tell you such information.
I see it's also available as a snap (published by the author AIUI) in
case the one on 22.04 doesn't fit you and you have snapd on the
machines.
Finally, there's also a web UI for it (basically ssh-audit as a
service): https://www.ssh-audit.com/
Does it solve your issues?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079834
Title:
libssh2-1 lacks support for rsa-sha2-{512,256}
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libssh2/+bug/2079834/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062119] Re: libtracefs autopkgtests fail on ppc64el
I've opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219358 upstream. ** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #219358 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219358 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062119 Title: libtracefs autopkgtests fail on ppc64el To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-systems/+bug/2062119/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083696] [NEW] FFe: Sync gcalcli 4.5.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync gcalcli 4.5.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: * Switch to google-auth-oauthlib from oauth2client (patches included in 4.4) (LP: #2078793): - 22dbc71c5dc17dace62e87b3f31b8cdb3eb37996.patch - f880c2c4fd1144ab15b3ace4a61e293dfe295053.patch - d01e7157de75cc8f954f4b8c566b073acd454e9a.patch - 1260a41410e1a8e11438ac41156f8dfe00c8791e.patch - 646314e6eaae630b90cc2bde51c8952295a452d7.patch * Provide a hint when token file deserialization fails (happens on update): - 0001-feat-print-an-error-message-when-.gcalcli_oauth-dese.patch The first set of patch are cherry-picks from upstream while the last patch has been submitted upstream and merged. They are therefore all included in the 4.5.0 release. Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception: The big change in gcalcli 4.4.0 and 4.5.0 is changes to authentication. The process has been made more reliable but this has also required changing how credentials are stored. In version 4.4.0, no migration was done: the user would instead get an error message, have to look at it, delete the file and do the authentication again. In contrast, 4.5.0 attempts to do the migration automatically, puts files in .config instead of directly in ~/ and has better error messages and hints. Upgrading from 4.3.0 directly to 4.5.0 also means all the changes happen in a single upgrade rather than go through the intermediate changes with 4.4.0. All of the above make for a better user experience and possibly fewer support requests. Changelog entries since current oracular version 4.3.0-2ubuntu1: gcalcli (4.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 4.5.0. - Fix lots of bugs by switching from deprecated oauth2client to google_auth_oauthlib. (Closes: #1029661, #1082043) * d/control: Use pybuild-plugin-pyproject, and derive depends from that. * d/rules: Write upstream version, cleaning up afterwards. * Update Standards-Version to 4.7.0. ** Affects: gcalcli (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Triaged ** Changed in: gcalcli (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083696 Title: FFe: Sync gcalcli 4.5.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcalcli/+bug/2083696/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083261] [NEW] gsasl: armhf test failures in oracular
Public bug reported: I've recently noticed that two subtests of gsasl have started failing a few months ago on armhf. This also happens in Debian. Unfortunately this coincided with infrastructure issues for Ubuntu and it's not clear which package has been causing the issue. Debian side, logs are not available far away enough to tell with certainty. One not- unlikely suspect is glibc but it's difficult to tell for sure. I haven't found anything obvious from test logs and I haven't found anything conclusive with strace either (logs are very different between arches unfortunately). It may be helpful to compare logs between noble and oracular rather than on oracular but with different versions. Test logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- oracular/oracular/armhf/g/gsasl/20240912_194229_c676e@/log.gz Excerpt: 2297s libgsasl PASS 2297s gsaslPASS (superficial) 2297s gsasl-scram-pbkdf2 PASS 2297s gsasl-dovecot-gssapi FAIL non-zero exit status 1 2297s gsasl-mailutils-cram PASS 2297s gsasl-mailutils-gs2krb5-gssapi FAIL non-zero exit status 1 2297s gsasl-mailutils-tls PASS ** Affects: gsasl (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Confirmed ** Tags: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083261 Title: gsasl: armhf test failures in oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gsasl/+bug/2083261/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083243] Re: [FFe] gsasl: FTBFS on s390x in oracular
I haven't opened a report yet. I need direct access to an s390x machine and not only to the builders, which I didn't have at hand yet. I shall try to do that this week. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083243 Title: [FFe] gsasl: FTBFS on s390x in oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gsasl/+bug/2083243/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083245] [NEW] [FFe] libgcrypt: FTBFS on s390x due to failed tests
Public bug reported: On s390x, libgcrypt20 FTBFS because the testsuite that runs at build- time fails. This was spotted during a test rebuild ( https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test- rebuild-20240912-oracular-oracular.html ). The log for the issue on s390x is at https://launchpadlibrarian.net/751878684/buildlog_ubuntu- oracular-s390x.libgcrypt20_1.11.0-6_BUILDING.txt.gz The error is below: computed: a0 12 f9 83 af cb 5e 36 37 4e 5f db a8 e7 5e 5d 08 d3 a6 fe 7a a7 f0 9d ed e0 12 3b 90 4e 55 f6 expected: c1 c3 69 25 b6 40 9a 04 f1 b5 04 fc bc a9 d8 2b 40 17 27 7c b5 ed 2b 20 65 fc 1d 38 14 d5 aa f5 basic: algo 329, digest mismatch computed: a0 12 f9 83 af cb 5e 36 37 4e 5f db a8 e7 5e 5d 08 d3 a6 fe 7a a7 f0 9d ed e0 12 3b 90 4e 55 f6 expected: c1 c3 69 25 b6 40 9a 04 f1 b5 04 fc bc a9 d8 2b 40 17 27 7c b5 ed 2b 20 65 fc 1d 38 14 d5 aa f5 basic: check_one_md_multi: algo 329, digest mismatch computed: 85 dc 9c ca a6 6f ab fb 94 17 cd 64 2d 53 ff b7 f2 30 ed 70 87 5c 69 e1 79 ab 72 1d 78 95 c7 e5 expected: c5 22 1d 50 e4 f8 22 d9 6a 2e 88 81 a9 61 42 0f 29 4b 7b 24 fe 3d 20 94 ba ed 2c 65 24 cc 16 6b basic: algo 329, digest mismatch computed: 85 dc 9c ca a6 6f ab fb 94 17 cd 64 2d 53 ff b7 f2 30 ed 70 87 5c 69 e1 79 ab 72 1d 78 95 c7 e5 expected: c5 22 1d 50 e4 f8 22 d9 6a 2e 88 81 a9 61 42 0f 29 4b 7b 24 fe 3d 20 94 ba ed 2c 65 24 cc 16 6b basic: check_one_md_multi: algo 329, digest mismatch computed: 33 dc 74 56 44 a8 0e 6b de 40 80 75 86 b4 86 4c 6c af d7 81 4e 7e bc a7 55 7a 48 ab c8 09 ba ba 1d a2 bc 5f ca 0b f7 9f ba b7 01 4a f2 1f 80 7b 7a a6 cd 0a c0 52 6c 1c 60 a0 6b f7 a8 3a 07 4c expected: d0 08 82 8e 2b 80 ac 9d 22 18 ff ee 1d 07 0c 48 b8 e4 c8 7b ff 32 c9 69 9d 5b 68 96 ee e0 ed d1 64 02 0e 2b e0 56 08 58 d9 c0 0c 03 7e 34 a9 69 37 c5 61 a7 4c 41 2b b4 c7 46 46 95 27 28 1c 8c basic: algo 330, digest mismatch computed: 33 dc 74 56 44 a8 0e 6b de 40 80 75 86 b4 86 4c 6c af d7 81 4e 7e bc a7 55 7a 48 ab c8 09 ba ba 1d a2 bc 5f ca 0b f7 9f ba b7 01 4a f2 1f 80 7b 7a a6 cd 0a c0 52 6c 1c 60 a0 6b f7 a8 3a 07 4c expected: d0 08 82 8e 2b 80 ac 9d 22 18 ff ee 1d 07 0c 48 b8 e4 c8 7b ff 32 c9 69 9d 5b 68 96 ee e0 ed d1 64 02 0e 2b e0 56 08 58 d9 c0 0c 03 7e 34 a9 69 37 c5 61 a7 4c 41 2b b4 c7 46 46 95 27 28 1c 8c basic: check_one_md_multi: algo 330, digest mismatch computed: a3 14 9a 0a 85 d1 f3 41 94 04 ba 8f cf a8 1a 27 b0 02 ae cc 93 4b 8b 3c d3 bf 79 de 22 63 33 51 38 8b f5 ba a6 74 52 d5 b3 56 f4 38 df 6f dc 4e 44 5c c7 cb a7 5e 5b 3d 86 bd 1f 97 ac 4f 8c 1a expected: 07 dc 27 b1 1e 51 fb ac 75 bc 7b 3c 1d 98 3e 8b 4b 85 fb 1d ef af 21 89 12 ac 86 43 02 73 09 17 27 f4 2b 17 ed 1d f6 3e 8e c1 18 f0 4b 23 63 3c 1d fb 15 74 c8 fb 55 cb 45 da 8e 25 af b0 92 bb basic: algo 330, digest mismatch computed: a3 14 9a 0a 85 d1 f3 41 94 04 ba 8f cf a8 1a 27 b0 02 ae cc 93 4b 8b 3c d3 bf 79 de 22 63 33 51 38 8b f5 ba a6 74 52 d5 b3 56 f4 38 df 6f dc 4e 44 5c c7 cb a7 5e 5b 3d 86 bd 1f 97 ac 4f 8c 1a expected: 07 dc 27 b1 1e 51 fb ac 75 bc 7b 3c 1d 98 3e 8b 4b 85 fb 1d ef af 21 89 12 ac 86 43 02 73 09 17 27 f4 2b 17 ed 1d f6 3e 8e c1 18 f0 4b 23 63 3c 1d fb 15 74 c8 fb 55 cb 45 da 8e 25 af b0 92 bb basic: check_one_md_multi: algo 330, digest mismatch FAIL: basic Also note the following success: now running 'basic' test with all hardware features disabled. PASS: basic-disable-all-hwf This comes from trying to use a CPU acceleration feature for SHA3 for cSHAKE which is based on SHA3 but slightly different. There is a patch upstream to stop trying to use the SHA3 acceleration for that. The patch is limited to s390x, simple, already upstream and merged: https://git.gnupg.org/cgi- bin/gitweb.cgi?p=libgcrypt.git;a=commit;h=2486d9b5ae015c1786cb84466a751da4bc0d7122 ** Affects: libgcrypt20 (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Adrien Nader (adrien) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083245 Title: [FFe] libgcrypt: FTBFS on s390x due to failed tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgcrypt20/+bug/2083245/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2083243] [NEW] [FFe] gsasl: FTBFS on s390x in oracular
Public bug reported:
During a test rebuild, Graham found out that gsasl FTBFS on s390x on
Oracular.
The rebuild report is at https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-
report/test-rebuild-20240912-oracular-oracular.html (it may update).
The issue is that one of the build steps never finishes (at least not
within 150 minutes).
The relevant failure is shown (edited) below:
libtool: link: gcc [...] -o test-parser test_parser-test-parser.o
./.libs/libgsasl-digest_md5.a ../gl/.libs/liblgl.a
E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity
An example of a failed build is at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-
rebuild-20240912-oracular/+build/28965803
I've tried disabling LTO and reducing parallelism but of these two, only
disabling LTO helped. I don't think it is a big concern for this package
which doesn't do a lot of heavy computations itself. This will be the
only delta from Debian so we'll certainly revisit the issue.
** Affects: gsasl (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Adrien Nader (adrien)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: gsasl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Nader (adrien)
** Changed in: gsasl (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10
** Changed in: gsasl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Summary changed:
- gsasl: FTBFS on s390x in oracular
+ [FFe] gsasl: FTBFS on s390x in oracular
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083243
Title:
[FFe] gsasl: FTBFS on s390x in oracular
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gsasl/+bug/2083243/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078793] Re: gcalcli: uses python3-oauth2client
Thanks for letting me know about it. I've taken a look at 4.5.0 and it seems too big for an upload this late in the Ubuntu cycle unfortunately; even the few patches for the files location are probably too much even though they're definitely welcome. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078793 Title: gcalcli: uses python3-oauth2client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcalcli/+bug/2078793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074069] Re: python-oauth2client is deprecated
Changing the target for 25.04 because it's late in the cycle and there are still a few packages to handle (certbot and pydrive2 iirc). ** Changed in: python-oauth2client (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-24.10 => None -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074069 Title: python-oauth2client is deprecated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-oauth2client/+bug/2074069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2081090] Re: gutenprint FTBFS due to 64-bit restriction
That's a good point. It seems the only thing to do in that case is to drop the dependency on architecture-is-64-bit . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081090 Title: gutenprint FTBFS due to 64-bit restriction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/+bug/2081090/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071779] Re: htpdate: autopkgtest failure on ppc64el
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: htpdate (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071779 Title: htpdate: autopkgtest failure on ppc64el To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/htpdate/+bug/2071779/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2081090] Re: gutenprint FTBFS due to 64-bit restriction
I tried building it too on armhf and encountered no issue. Looking at my analysis results, libgutenprint-dev did not build and was therefore not analyzed and libgutenprintui2-dev did not have an ABI incompatibility. This means that the library should go through the t64 transition. If you consider this a big issue, someone may be able to fix the build and therefore get analysis results as it's maybe only a matter of ensuring "stp_vars_t" is defined before being used. I must mention that I won't be able to try doing that before Thursday and I'm not sure I still have any of the systems used for the analysis. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081090 Title: gutenprint FTBFS due to 64-bit restriction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/+bug/2081090/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073991] Re: Add FIPS defines to Noble OpenSSL header files
Alright, 0046-signature-Clamp-PSS-salt-len-to-MD-len.patch has been merged upstream for openssl 3.1: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/6c73ca4a2f4ea71f4a880670624e7b2fdb6f32da No concern for OSSL_PKEY_RSA_PSS_SALT_LEN_AUTO_DIGEST_MAX and RSA_PSS_SALTLEN_AUTO_DIGEST_MAX in openssl >= 3.1 and therefore Oracular. This would need more careful examination for an SRU to Noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073991 Title: Add FIPS defines to Noble OpenSSL header files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2073991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073991] Re: Add FIPS defines to Noble OpenSSL header files
I've been preparing a build that includes these changes. These are fine: UBUNTU_OSSL_PROV_FIPS_PARAM_UNAPPROVED_USAGE UBUNTU_OSSL_SELF_TEST_DESC_PCT_DH These don't seem fine: OSSL_PKEY_RSA_PSS_SALT_LEN_AUTO_DIGEST_MAX RSA_PSS_SALTLEN_AUTO_DIGEST_MAX Defining them would change the behavior of the library it seems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073991 Title: Add FIPS defines to Noble OpenSSL header files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2073991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2079970] Re: Debug symbols are unavailable for 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.18 (security update)
Tobias, I think the files are available now. Package: libssl3-dbgsym Package-Type: ddeb Architecture: amd64 Version: 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.18 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079970 Title: Debug symbols are unavailable for 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.18 (security update) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2079970/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078793] Re: gcalcli: uses python3-oauth2client
The MR at https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/gcalcli/+git/gcalcli/+merge/472464 is now ready for review. ** Description changed: gcalcli is another application that had been using oauth2client and I had unfortunately missed it. Luckily, upstream patched that mid-August. It reportedly fixed issues for the application. I haven't been able to use it on the canonical account unfortunately and I don't have another account to test this with. I'm currently waiting for the feedback of a volunteer. This gives us two good reasons to include this in oracular: - authentication was broken; it still worked for some people, sometimes, if they had set it up years ago - one less package depends on python3-oauth2client There are five relevant patches that I've identified. They all happened in a row and could have been a single commit. - Replace deprecated oauth2client with google-auth: https://github.com/insanum/gcalcli/commit/22dbc71c5dc17dace62e87b3f31b8cdb3eb37996 - Actually leave oauth2client for argparser: https://github.com/insanum/gcalcli/commit/f880c2c4fd1144ab15b3ace4a61e293dfe295053 - Use google-auth: https://github.com/insanum/gcalcli/commit/d01e7157de75cc8f954f4b8c566b073acd454e9a - Prevent browser from opening automatically. https://github.com/insanum/gcalcli/commit/1260a41410e1a8e11438ac41156f8dfe00c8791e - Remove deprecated oauth arguments. https://github.com/insanum/gcalcli/commit/646314e6eaae630b90cc2bde51c8952295a452d7 There is a PPA at https://launchpad.net/~adrien/+archive/ubuntu/oracular-gcalcli-drop- oauth2client . - The WIP MR is at + The MR is at https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/gcalcli/+git/gcalcli/+merge/472464 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078793 Title: gcalcli: uses python3-oauth2client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcalcli/+bug/2078793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078793] Re: gcalcli: uses python3-oauth2client
I've opened a PR upstream for a better error message: https://github.com/insanum/gcalcli/pull/733 . The log message appears above the backtrace but there is a delay between the message and the backtrace and the message is colored in red. It's quite visible. I'm currently building a version with this patch in addition to the others and Unit193's NEWS entry. Lastly, based on Dave's feedback (thanks!), I'm pretty confident this will work. Dave only had an issue in the last step which is not a surprise considering his setup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078793 Title: gcalcli: uses python3-oauth2client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcalcli/+bug/2078793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073991] Re: Add FIPS defines to Noble OpenSSL header files
Updating target. Would be nice to have in Noble but no strong need at the moment. Target is 25.04 which I can't refer to at the moment unfortunately since the release is not create in launchpad yet. ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Nader (adrien) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073991 Title: Add FIPS defines to Noble OpenSSL header files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2073991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078793] Re: gcalcli: uses python3-oauth2client
Hi, That's an interesting aspect that I had overlooked and I see how it can be annoying. Looking at the code, I'm not sure there can be a way to move the data from oauth2client storage to google-auth without spending a lot of time doing so. The two are quite different. A related issue is that the filename for both is the same. At least, as far as I can tell from your backtrace, this doesn't lose the original file. Can you confirm that? It's also a shame that users who upgrade are greeted by a non-descriptive backtrace and no diagnostic due to that. Finally, it seems that the config_folder option is not used anymore here. By the way, have you been able to confirm the migration to google-auth works for you? I wanted to use it with the google account I have through canonical but this actually doesn't work, probably due to company policy (it goes quite far but I get an error during the in-browser authorisation). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078793 Title: gcalcli: uses python3-oauth2client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcalcli/+bug/2078793/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2078793] [NEW] gcalcli: uses python3-oauth2client
Public bug reported:
gcalcli is another application that had been using oauth2client and I
had unfortunately missed it.
Luckily, upstream patched that mid-August. It reportedly fixed issues
for the application. I haven't been able to use it on the canonical
account unfortunately and I don't have another account to test this
with. I'm currently waiting for the feedback of a volunteer.
This gives us two good reasons to include this in oracular:
- authentication was broken; it still worked for some people, sometimes, if
they had set it up years ago
- one less package depends on python3-oauth2client
There are five relevant patches that I've identified. They all happened
in a row and could have been a single commit.
- Replace deprecated oauth2client with google-auth:
https://github.com/insanum/gcalcli/commit/22dbc71c5dc17dace62e87b3f31b8cdb3eb37996
- Actually leave oauth2client for argparser:
https://github.com/insanum/gcalcli/commit/f880c2c4fd1144ab15b3ace4a61e293dfe295053
- Use google-auth:
https://github.com/insanum/gcalcli/commit/d01e7157de75cc8f954f4b8c566b073acd454e9a
- Prevent browser from opening automatically.
https://github.com/insanum/gcalcli/commit/1260a41410e1a8e11438ac41156f8dfe00c8791e
- Remove deprecated oauth arguments.
https://github.com/insanum/gcalcli/commit/646314e6eaae630b90cc2bde51c8952295a452d7
There is a PPA at
https://launchpad.net/~adrien/+archive/ubuntu/oracular-gcalcli-drop-
oauth2client .
The WIP MR is at
https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/gcalcli/+git/gcalcli/+merge/472464
** Affects: gcalcli (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Adrien Nader (adrien)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078793
Title:
gcalcli: uses python3-oauth2client
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcalcli/+bug/2078793/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2076930] Re: Removal request: python-certbot-dns-google
There is an argument for removing it though: we don't know if it's still working. But what's worse: a non-working package, or a removed package one? I'm not sure they're very different in this situation. The main reason for removing packages was that they hold back other changes due to autopkgtest regressions. With fewer packages involved due to updates and britney hints, that's far less problematic now and I don't see a hurry to remove this package. It's worth mentioning that now that I look at this with a fresh mind, I notice that I got a bit confused by how the certbot plugins are organized. The dns-google plugin lives in the certbot git repository but is then uploaded to pypi which serves as the upstream for the python- certbot source package in Debian. Version numbers between certbot and the plugins match but they don't absolutely have to. As a consequence, it might be possible to cherry-pick https://github.com/certbot/certbot/commit/b0d0a832772bc7747f65c2c2c90d0f790fa40f8a . The python-certbot version is a bit older than that patch but mismatches don't look very likely. The patch should apply with no major modification to the current python-certbot-dns-google package (restrict to the effective directory, remove tests (gah!), fix some offsets and fix a conflict in setup.py). My main concern at the moment is that I can't fully test the changes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076930 Title: Removal request: python-certbot-dns-google To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-certbot-dns-google/+bug/2076930/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2077464] Re: lscpu: Skip aarch64 decode path for rest of the architectures
I can confirm the issue: BIOS Model name: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS w/ Radeon 780M Graphics Unknown CPU @ 3.8GHz It looks very minor however. As far as I'm concerned, it doesn't look like it would be worth SRU'ing it, and considering we're past feature- freeze for oracular, I'm not sure it would make it to oracular either. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077464 Title: lscpu: Skip aarch64 decode path for rest of the architectures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/2077464/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074069] Re: python-oauth2client is deprecated
** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074069 Title: python-oauth2client is deprecated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-oauth2client/+bug/2074069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074186] Re: pyopenssl: removed API breaks python-oauth2client
** Description changed: python-oauth2client uses deprecated pyopenssl APIs and now they've been removed. + + See the actual issue in python-oauth2client : + https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074069 + + I'm removing the "duplicate" status because I think this prevents this + issue from showing up in update excuses. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 2074069 python-oauth2client is deprecated -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074186 Title: pyopenssl: removed API breaks python-oauth2client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyopenssl/+bug/2074186/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073991] Re: Add FIPS defines to Noble OpenSSL header files
Hi Eric and thanks for the report. The SRU process necessarily takes time and openssl is a library that is installed everywhere and is therefore more difficult to get through the SRU process. Time-wise (including due to my own availability), I don't think there will be a patched openssl version included for Noble before several weeks, maybe a couple months. Moreover, it would be valuable to obtain a validation from the lab in order to know which other patches might be required. The breakdown would be the following: 1- an openssl FIPS build in PPA, which is sent for validation, 2- the corresponding patches are added to openssl for oracular, 3- the corresponding patches are added to openssl for noble ** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073991 Title: Add FIPS defines to Noble OpenSSL header files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2073991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073991] Re: Add FIPS defines to Noble OpenSSL header files
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 ** Also affects: openssl (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openssl (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Noble) Milestone: None => noble-updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073991 Title: Add FIPS defines to Noble OpenSSL header files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2073991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074186] [NEW] pyopenssl: removed API breaks python-oauth2client
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2074069 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074069 Public bug reported: python-oauth2client uses deprecated pyopenssl APIs and now they've been removed. ** Affects: pyopenssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2074069 python-oauth2client is deprecated -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074186 Title: pyopenssl: removed API breaks python-oauth2client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyopenssl/+bug/2074186/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074069] Re: python-oauth2client is deprecated
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074069 Title: python-oauth2client is deprecated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-oauth2client/+bug/2074069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059101] Re: Automatic EST certificate retrieval does not work on Ubuntu 22.04
With everything happening with the Noble release, I didn't handle that back in March and then I forgot about it. Sorry about that. Is this still relevant? And is there a reproducer that I can run? I'm asking for a reproducer because having to rely on a reporter or an environement I don't have access to is particularly painful for openssl due to how sensible it is. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059101 Title: Automatic EST certificate retrieval does not work on Ubuntu 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2059101/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074069] Re: python-oauth2client is deprecated
** Changed in: python-oauth2client (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: python-oauth2client (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: python-oauth2client (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074069 Title: python-oauth2client is deprecated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-oauth2client/+bug/2074069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2074069] [NEW] python-oauth2client is deprecated
Public bug reported: This package has been deprecated seven years ago and is becoming incompatible with other packages. Recently, pyopenssl dropped an API for PKCS#12 which python-oauth2client uses; it's getting more and more difficult to keep the package alive, hence the need to migrate to its replacements. I've done a number of changes over the past weeks in order to remove this package. Unfortunately, some thing remain, most notably: - pydrive2 extensively uses it, see https://github.com/iterative/PyDrive2/pull/221 for the most recent work on this topic; it's possible that vendoring the library will be required (if it can still be made to work!) There are also in-review changes: - beancount: https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/beancount/+git/beancount/+merge/469654 - cinder: https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/cinder/+git/cinder/+merge/470004 - fence-agents: https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+git/fence-agents/+merge/469471 ** Affects: python-oauth2client (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Confirmed ** Description changed: This package has been deprecated seven years ago and is becoming incompatible with other packages. Recently, pyopenssl dropped an API for PKCS#12 which python-oauth2client uses; it's getting more and more difficult to keep the package alive, hence the need to migrate to its replacements. I've done a number of changes over the past weeks in order to remove this package. Unfortunately, some thing remain, most notably: - pydrive2 extensively uses it, see https://github.com/iterative/PyDrive2/pull/221 for the most recent work on this topic; it's possible that vendoring the library will be required (if it can still be made to work!) - - certbot: (need to check something) There are also in-review changes: - beancount: https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/beancount/+git/beancount/+merge/469654 - cinder: https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/cinder/+git/cinder/+merge/470004 - fence-agents: https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+git/fence-agents/+merge/469471 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074069 Title: python-oauth2client is deprecated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-oauth2client/+bug/2074069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073850] Re: python3-googleapi should depend on python3-google-api-core
I'm going to close this as GCS uploaded a new python3-googleapi version to Debian that is new enough for our needs and depends on python3-google-api-core (which I packaged and Julian sponsored in Debian). I've requested a sync that Benjamin did soon after; the package is currently in -proposed. ** Changed in: python-googleapi (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073850 Title: python3-googleapi should depend on python3-google-api-core To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-googleapi/+bug/2073850/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073859] [NEW] fence-agents: use google-auth rather than oauth2client
Public bug reported: python3-oauth2client has been deprecated and unmaintained for several years. It's not compatible anymore with new version of pyopenssl. It has also been replaced with google-auth: https://google- auth.readthedocs.io/en/latest/oauth2client-deprecation.html fence-agents makes the switch easy since it has dynamic support for both python3-google-auth and python3-oauthclient as visible in https://github.com/ClusterLabs/fence- agents/blob/main/agents/gce/fence_gce.py#L37-L40 . The only need is to change dependencies so that google-auth (the prefered library) is available and it will be used. ** Affects: fence-agents (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073859 Title: fence-agents: use google-auth rather than oauth2client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/2073859/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073850] [NEW] python3-googleapi should depend on python3-google-api-core
Public bug reported: The new version of python-googleapi introduces a dependency on python3-google-api-core. Now that this package has been added to the archive, a dependency on it should be added to python-googleapi. ** Affects: python-googleapi (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Adrien Nader (adrien) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: python-googleapi (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073850 Title: python3-googleapi should depend on python3-google-api-core To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-googleapi/+bug/2073850/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073242] Re: Tests require python-oauth2client
** Also affects: cinder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Nader (adrien) ** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 ** Changed in: cinder Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073242 Title: Tests require python-oauth2client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/2073242/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1988398] Re: crash due to incomplete AVX check
Removing the foundations-todo tag as I don't see a plan to work on this in the near future considering the current state and infos available. ** Tags removed: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988398 Title: crash due to incomplete AVX check To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/1988398/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1988398] Re: crash due to incomplete AVX check
Is there still a wish for this on Jammy? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988398 Title: crash due to incomplete AVX check To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/1988398/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073366] [NEW] beancount: remove dependency on python3-oauth2client
Public bug reported: python3-oauth2client is abandonned. ** Affects: beancount (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Adrien Nader (adrien) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: beancount (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Nader (adrien) ** Changed in: beancount (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 ** Changed in: beancount (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: beancount (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073366 Title: beancount: remove dependency on python3-oauth2client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/beancount/+bug/2073366/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069355] Re: python-google-api-core: please package
Done: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-google-api-core ** Changed in: Ubuntu Oracular Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: Ubuntu Oracular Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069355 Title: python-google-api-core: please package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2069355/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072750] Re: Please migrate hwloc to 2.11.0-2
** Description changed: hwloc (2.10.0-1build1 to 2.11.0-2) - Migration status for hwloc (2.10.0-1build1 to 2.11.0-2): Will attempt migration (Any information below is purely informational) - Additional info: - 7 days old + Migration status for hwloc (2.10.0-1build1 to 2.11.0-2): Will attempt migration (Any information below is purely informational) + Additional info: + 7 days old + + + It depends on "hwloc-contrib" packages to migrate and dose-distcheck reports that in turn this requires "libnvidia-compute-550 (>= 550.90.07)" which cannot migrate due to other reasons (related to the kernel). + +missing: + pkg: + package: libhwloc-contrib-plugins + version: 2.11.0-1 + architecture: arm64 + unsat-dependency: libnvidia-compute-550 (>= 550.90.07) ** Summary changed: - Please migrate hwloc to 2.11.0-2 + hwloc 2.11.0-2 cannot migrate without libnvidia-compute-550 (>= 550.90.07) ** Summary changed: - hwloc 2.11.0-2 cannot migrate without libnvidia-compute-550 (>= 550.90.07) + hwloc 2.11.0-2 stuck in proposed as it requires libnvidia-compute-550 (>= 550.90.07) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072750 Title: hwloc 2.11.0-2 stuck in proposed as it requires libnvidia-compute-550 (>= 550.90.07) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hwloc/+bug/2072750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1990216] Re: backport fix for "OpenSSL 3 cannot decrypt data encrypted with OpenSSL 1.1 with blowfish in OFB or CFB modes" to Jammy
Hi Fredrik, can you confirm that I understand correctly: you have one node on 24.04 and the other nodes on 22.04? Can you test with other nodes on 20.04 in order to confirm you are effectively encountering this issue? Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990216 Title: backport fix for "OpenSSL 3 cannot decrypt data encrypted with OpenSSL 1.1 with blowfish in OFB or CFB modes" to Jammy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1990216/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined
** Also affects: jose (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: libtpms (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: proftpd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: swtpm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071468 Title: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asymptote/+bug/2071468/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1297025] Re: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package
I had misunderstood the actual issue. I thought the changelog.gz files was never there but it turns out it's created and installed in the directories to package but then pkgbinarymangler's pkgstripfiles runs and deletes them. Resolution is the same: don't create the symlinks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297025 Title: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1297025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069355] Re: python-google-api-core: please package
** Also affects: Ubuntu Oracular Importance: High Assignee: Adrien Nader (adrien) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069355 Title: python-google-api-core: please package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2069355/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2070046] Re: googleapi missing runtime dependency
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2069355 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069355 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2069355 python-google-api-core: please package -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070046 Title: googleapi missing runtime dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-googleapi/+bug/2070046/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1297025] Re: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Nader (adrien) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297025 Title: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1297025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067672] Re: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non-existent location
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 ** Also affects: openssl (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openssl (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Noble) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.1 ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Oracular) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Nader (adrien) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067672 Title: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non- existent location To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2067672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067672] Re: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non-existent location
Hey, a quick update. With openssl 3.2.1 uploaded to Oracular, I've prepared the subsequent 3.2.2 (doing it so soon wasn't planned initially). I'm including a fix for this and for #1297025 : https://git.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/openssl/commit/?id=5f94de31126ae59f2481fe77a397df9fb0941bd8 This will satisfy the SRU requirement that the fix is first included in the development release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067672 Title: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non- existent location To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2067672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1297025] Re: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297025 Title: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1297025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067384] Re: openssl: merge 3.2.1-3 from unstable
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067384 Title: openssl: merge 3.2.1-3 from unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2067384/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069740] Re: camitk: FTBFS with VTK 9.3
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1073793 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073793 ** Also affects: camitk (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073793 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069740 Title: camitk: FTBFS with VTK 9.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/camitk/+bug/2069740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069714] Re: therion: 6.2.1-1build1 FTBFS with texlive-binaries 2024.20240313.70630+ds-2
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069714 Title: therion: 6.2.1-1build1 FTBFS with texlive-binaries 2024.20240313.70630+ds-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/therion/+bug/2069714/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069740] [NEW] camitk: FTBFS with VTK 9.3
Public bug reported: There are several issues with VTK 9.3. Upstream bug report at https://gricad-gitlab.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/CamiTK/CamiTK/-/issues/193 . I'm copying my report below: In sdk/components/vtkimage/RawDataDialog.cpp, vtkConfigure.h is not packaged anymore and vtkType.h should be included instead In sdk/actions/mesh/basicmesh/MeshQuality.cpp, VTK 9.2 has renamed SetHexQualityMeasureToMaxEdgeRatios and SetQuadQualityMeasureToMaxEdgeRatios: the trailing 's' is removed In sdk/actions/mesh/basicmesh/MeshQuality.cpp, VTK 9.2 "vtkMeshQuality and vtkCellQuality [...] no longer supports the AspectBeta tetrahedron metric", and I'm not sure what to do as this could impact the library's API. ** Affects: camitk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Triaged ** Tags: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069740 Title: camitk: FTBFS with VTK 9.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/camitk/+bug/2069740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069722] Re: dpkg: ELF package metadata prevents some packages from building
Based on autopkgtests, at least these packages are impacted: asymptote, golang-logrus, graphite2, gsequencer, mosh, python-cmake-build- extension, rust-libc, seqan3, slt. Based on my own experience, camitk is also impacted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069722 Title: dpkg: ELF package metadata prevents some packages from building To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/2069722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069722] [NEW] dpkg: ELF package metadata prevents some packages from building
Public bug reported: Some packages do not build anymore, citing a missing environment variable. ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069722 Title: dpkg: ELF package metadata prevents some packages from building To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/2069722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069714] Re: therion: 6.2.1-1build1 FTBFS (vtk9 9.3?)
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1072828 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072828 ** Also affects: texlive-bin (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072828 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Summary changed: - therion: 6.2.1-1build1 FTBFS (vtk9 9.3?) + therion: 6.2.1-1build1 FTBFS with texlive-binaries 2024.20240313.70630+ds-2 ** Description changed: - The therion package fails to builds. It might be related to vtk9 9.3 - since it started with this transition but the issue is a missing font - file (logo10 at 600dpi) for latex which is not completely consistent - with that. Since this file is required only if other font files are not - found, we can add a depends on texlive-fonts-recommended and skip the - issue. + The therion package fails to builds. mktexpk seems to not work and is + required sincea font file for latex (logo10 at 600dpi) is missing. Since + this file is required only if other font files are not found, we can add + a depends on texlive-fonts-recommended and skip the issue it seems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069714 Title: therion: 6.2.1-1build1 FTBFS with texlive-binaries 2024.20240313.70630+ds-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/therion/+bug/2069714/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069714] [NEW] therion: 6.2.1-1build1 FTBFS (vtk9 9.3?)
Public bug reported: The therion package fails to builds. It might be related to vtk9 9.3 since it started with this transition but the issue is a missing font file (logo10 at 600dpi) for latex which is not completely consistent with that. Since this file is required only if other font files are not found, we can add a depends on texlive-fonts-recommended and skip the issue. ** Affects: therion (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Adrien Nader (adrien) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069714 Title: therion: 6.2.1-1build1 FTBFS (vtk9 9.3?) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/therion/+bug/2069714/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069612] Re: gdcm: FTBFS with vtk9 9.3
** Description changed: gdcm 3.0.24-1build1 FTBFS with VTK9 9.3 + + First error: + + CMake Error at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/vtk-9.3/vtkModule.cmake:2121 (message): + The `SPDX_DESTINATION` must not be an absolute path. Use + `CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX` to keep everything in a single installation prefix. + + Second error (when first is fixed) is about CMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR for + the new file usr/include/vtkgdcmpython.h -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069612 Title: gdcm: FTBFS with vtk9 9.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdcm/+bug/2069612/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069612] [NEW] gdcm: FTBFS with vtk9 9.3
Public bug reported: gdcm 3.0.24-1build1 FTBFS with VTK9 9.3 ** Affects: gdcm (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Adrien Nader (adrien) Status: In Progress ** Tags: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069612 Title: gdcm: FTBFS with vtk9 9.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdcm/+bug/2069612/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069355] Re: python-google-api-core: please package
NB: I wasn't able to assign the bug to the python-google-api-core package, probably because it doesn't exist yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069355 Title: python-google-api-core: please package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2069355/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069355] [NEW] python-google-api-core: please package
Public bug reported: Please package python-google-api-core which is now a dependency of python-googleapi. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: High Assignee: Adrien Nader (adrien) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069355 Title: python-google-api-core: please package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2069355/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069129] Re: [UBUNTU 24.04] Cannot find or install the 'crypto-policies' package
Hi, crypto-policies is not supported on Ubuntu: it requires deep integration with the packages and their configurations. This integration doesn't exist and is unlikely to ever exist outside of redhat-based distributions because of how tight it has to be. Past uses of crypto- policies on Ubuntu and Debian have therefore been without effect. Note that I'm working on something related that should be announced soon with a 26.04 target. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069129 Title: [UBUNTU 24.04] Cannot find or install the 'crypto-policies' package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2069129/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068713] Re: shoogle: please remove (unmaintained, low usage)
** Description changed: Shoogle is not compatible with new python-googleapi releases. It is also low-popcon ( https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=shoogle ). There has been one upstream version uploaded to debian in 2017 and then only fixes by the packager. The package seems moderately active though but he hasn't released version -11 yet even though it's been in the VCS for 2 years. Unfortunately, shoogle is blocking a new version of python-googleapi that is itself needed to get rid of python-oauth2client. + Also, no reverse-depencies: + + % reverse-depends src:shoogle + No reverse dependencies found + % reverse-depends src:shoogle -a source + No reverse dependencies found + As such, please remove from oracular and we can see later if it's updating and coming back. PS: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shoogle/+bug/2062999 was recently reported and indicates there is at least one (tentative?) user on Noble but it also indicates the package might not be working well on Noble already. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068713 Title: shoogle: please remove (unmaintained, low usage) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shoogle/+bug/2068713/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068716] Re: pydrive: please remove (replaced by pydrive2)
** Description changed: Pydrive has been replaced by pydrive2 and it depends on python- oauth2client which we'd like to remove as it is deprecated, unmaintained, and is preventing some migrations. Please remove pydrive so that we can continue with the removal. Note that pydrive2 also uses python-oauth2client but we need to start somewhere and if there's only one package that depends on that library, it will be easier to e.g. vendor if needed. + + % reverse-depends src:pydrive + Reverse-Recommends + == + * ubuntu-budgie-desktop (for python3-pydrive) + * ubuntu-budgie-desktop-raspi [arm64 armhf] + + % reverse-depends src:pydrive -a source + No reverse dependencies found + + pydrive2 will be picked up (and we can also remove the Recommends) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068716 Title: pydrive: please remove (replaced by pydrive2) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pydrive/+bug/2068716/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068716] [NEW] pydrive: please remove (replaced by pydrive2)
Public bug reported: Pydrive has been replaced by pydrive2 and it depends on python- oauth2client which we'd like to remove as it is deprecated, unmaintained, and is preventing some migrations. Please remove pydrive so that we can continue with the removal. Note that pydrive2 also uses python-oauth2client but we need to start somewhere and if there's only one package that depends on that library, it will be easier to e.g. vendor if needed. ** Affects: pydrive (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068716 Title: pydrive: please remove (replaced by pydrive2) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pydrive/+bug/2068716/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068713] [NEW] shoogle: please remove (unmaintained, low usage)
Public bug reported: Shoogle is not compatible with new python-googleapi releases. It is also low-popcon ( https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=shoogle ). There has been one upstream version uploaded to debian in 2017 and then only fixes by the packager. The package seems moderately active though but he hasn't released version -11 yet even though it's been in the VCS for 2 years. Unfortunately, shoogle is blocking a new version of python-googleapi that is itself needed to get rid of python-oauth2client. As such, please remove from oracular and we can see later if it's updating and coming back. PS: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shoogle/+bug/2062999 was recently reported and indicates there is at least one (tentative?) user on Noble but it also indicates the package might not be working well on Noble already. Thanks. ** Affects: shoogle (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068713 Title: shoogle: please remove (unmaintained, low usage) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shoogle/+bug/2068713/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062999] Re: Errors during install
Shoogle hasn't been updated in several years and I wouldn't be surprised there are compatibility issues with new python versions. I was actually coming here to ask for its removal as it's not compatible with new python-googleapi (which had not been updated in several years either). The incompatibility might be small but everything is relative to the actual usage of the package. Do you use this package actively? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062999 Title: Errors during install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shoogle/+bug/2062999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062999] Re: Errors during install
Also, removal would only apply for Oracular (the development version), not Noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062999 Title: Errors during install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shoogle/+bug/2062999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067672] Re: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non-existent location
Noble will not use 3.2.1. Only oracular will. Unfortunately, I don't have a very good answer about how to get this fix in Noble as quickly as possible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067672 Title: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non- existent location To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2067672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067672] Re: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non-existent location
Hi and thanks for the patch. Process-wise, the changes should land in oracular first and I don't think I changed anything regarding that, even in my merge proposal for 3.2.1. I think we can integrate your patch in oracular in the version that follows the 3.2.1 merge (I'd prefer not to respin my current merge request) and which will also include at least afix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1297025 (and maybe a security patch too). lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Feb 21 11:45 /usr/share/doc/libssl- dev/changelog.gz -> ../libssl3/changelog.gz but ../libssl3/changelog.gz doesn't exist. This is on my list of things to do in the comings days, or weeks at most. I guess your main worry was the copyright file however. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067672 Title: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non- existent location To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2067672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1297025] Re: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297025 Title: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1297025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063094] Re: unattended-upgrades is running forever
Attaching 20 seconds of strace output for my case. This actually lead me to look at /var/log/unattended- upgrades/unattended-upgrades-shutdown.log and I Noticed the following: 2024-01-18 15:01:16,996 WARNING - SIGTERM or SIGHUP received, stopping unattended-upgrades only if it is running 2024-01-18 15:01:22,365 WARNING - Could not get delay inhibitor lock 2024-01-18 15:01:24,367 WARNING - Unable to monitor PrepareForShutdown() signal, polling instead. 2024-01-18 15:01:24,367 WARNING - To enable monitoring the PrepareForShutdown() signal instead of polling please install the python3-gi package I also have that in my journal logs: systemd[1]: Starting systemd-logind.service - User Login Management... (d-logind)[1994541]: systemd-logind.service: Failed to set up mount namespacing: Permission denied (d-logind)[1994541]: systemd-logind.service: Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning /lib/systemd/systemd-logind: Permission denied systemd[1]: systemd-logind.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=226/NAMESPACE systemd[1]: systemd-logind.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. systemd[1]: Failed to start systemd-logind.service - User Login Management. systemd[1]: systemd-logind.service: Scheduled restart job, restart counter is at 1. systemd[1]: Stopped systemd-logind.service - User Login Management. systemd[1]: modprobe@drm.service - Load Kernel Module drm was skipped because of an unmet condition check (ConditionCapability=CAP_SYS_MODULE). and [system] Failed to activate service 'org.freedesktop.login1': timed out (service_start_timeout=25000ms) [system] Rejected: destination has a full message queue, 0 matched rules; type="error", sender="(unset)" ((bus)) interface="(unset)" member="(unset)" error name="org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.TimedOut" requested_reply="1" destination=":1.1" (uid=0 pid=115 comm="/usr/bin/python3 /usr/share/unattended-upgrades/un") (last line is repeated 9 times in total) Unfortunately I can't really go back and see when this started. Considering the total CPU time and the average CPU usage (which seems to be slightly above 50% in practice, with peaks at 100%), the issue might be present since the machine was booted. However I now see the link with an issue I've been seeing for a long time on the host in dmesg: audit: type=1400 audit(1717098847.156:4846706): apparmor="DENIED" operation="mount" info="failed flags match" error=-13 profile="lxc- container-default-cgns" name="/" pid=840997 comm="(d-logind)" flags="rw, rslave" I found some related topics which indicate I'm not entirely alone but I really can't tell if the bug initially reported here and mine are the same. I think the universal teaching here is that there can be loops for many different reasons, including maybe through dbus and service activation. ** Attachment added: "unattended-upgrades.strace" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/2063094/+attachment/5784329/+files/unattended-upgrades.strace -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063094 Title: unattended-upgrades is running forever To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/2063094/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063094] Re: unattended-upgrades is running forever
Also, note that out of my three stuck processes, it seems got unstuck. Can't tell why however. I also talked about running out of space but I don't think that was the issue: it was the reason I looked at the machine but it wasn't related to unattended-upgrades. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063094 Title: unattended-upgrades is running forever To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/2063094/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063094] Re: unattended-upgrades is running forever
I have 10 backtraces with python3-dbg installed and therefore more complete backtraces (but I wouldn't call them very readable). I'm going to attach them here (.tar.xz archive which extracts in the current directory). ** Attachment added: "unattended-upgrades-bt.tar.xz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/2063094/+attachment/5784171/+files/unattended-upgrades-bt.tar.xz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063094 Title: unattended-upgrades is running forever To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/2063094/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063094] Re: unattended-upgrades is running forever
I'm seeing very different traces. Sorry. :) I have processes which appear stuck and which have been using more than 11 weeks of CPU time over the past 132 days. No idea if it was in only one run (I think I looked at CPU time less than 132 days ago, and even less than 11 weeks ago, so it probably hasn't been stuck for 11 weeks). This happens in three LXC containers which run debian stable. It seems I ran out of space on the containers, but definitely not 11 weeks ago, maybe two weeks ago at most. Traces I see: Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f9ca69f4040 (LWP 115) "unattended-upgr"): #0 0x7f9ca6a7ad26 in _xbegin () at /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/include/rtmintrin.h:52 #1 __GI___lll_trylock_elision (futex=0x2b0c9a0, adapt_count=0x89) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/elision-trylock.c:46 #2 0x00a840d8 in _PyRuntime () #3 0x0058a52a in PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords (args=, keywords=, format=, kwlist=) at ../Python/getargs.c:1394 #4 0x0058a245 in acquire_timed (timeout=, lock=0x7fffcf0f55f0) at ../Modules/_threadmodule.c:98 #5 lock_PyThread_acquire_lock (self=0x2b0c9a0, args=, kwds=) at ../Modules/_threadmodule.c:179 #6 0x00550bbe in method_vectorcall_VARARGS_KEYWORDS (func=0x7f9ca6976f70, args=0x7f9ca6cff398, nargsf=, kwnames=) at ../Objects/descrobject.c:364 #7 0x0053ac2c in _PyObject_VectorcallTstate (kwnames=, nargsf=, args=, callable=0x7f9ca6976f70, tstate=0xa840d8 <_PyRuntime+166328>) at ../Include/internal/pycore_call.h:92 #8 PyObject_Vectorcall (callable=0x7f9ca6976f70, args=, nargsf=, kwnames=) at ../Objects/call.c:299 #9 0x0052b940 in _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault (tstate=, frame=, throwflag=) at ../Python/ceval.c:4772 #10 0x0052360b in _PyEval_EvalFrame (throwflag=0, frame=0x7f9ca6cff020, tstate=0xa840d8 <_PyRuntime+166328>) at ../Include/internal/pycore_ceval.h:73 #11 _PyEval_Vector (args=0x0, argcount=0, kwnames=0x0, locals=, func=0x7f9ca69ba020, tstate=0xa840d8 <_PyRuntime+166328>) at ../Python/ceval.c:6435 #12 PyEval_EvalCode (co=0x2959f10, globals=, locals=) at ../Python/ceval.c:1154 #13 0x00647497 in run_eval_code_obj (tstate=0xa840d8 <_PyRuntime+166328>, co=0x2959f10, globals=0x7f9ca69dec80, locals=0x7f9ca69dec80) at ../Python/pythonrun.c:1714 #14 0x00644d4f in run_mod (mod=, filename=, globals=0x7f9ca69dec80, locals=0x7f9ca69dec80, flags=, arena=) at ../Python/pythonrun.c:1735 #15 0x00651010 in pyrun_file (fp=fp@entry=0x2906830, filename=filename@entry=0x7f9ca6918f80, start=start@entry=257, globals=globals@entry=0x7f9ca69dec80, locals=locals@entry=0x7f9ca69dec80, closeit=closeit@entry=1, flags=0x7fffcf0f5a68) at ../Python/pythonrun.c:1630 #16 0x00650d5b in _PyRun_SimpleFileObject (fp=fp@entry=0x2906830, filename=filename@entry=0x7f9ca6918f80, closeit=closeit@entry=1, flags=flags@entry=0x7fffcf0f5a68) at ../Python/pythonrun.c:440 #17 0x00650b84 in _PyRun_AnyFileObject (fp=0x2906830, filename=0x7f9ca6918f80, closeit=1, flags=0x7fffcf0f5a68) at ../Python/pythonrun.c:79 #18 0x0064f90f in pymain_run_file_obj (skip_source_first_line=0, filename=0x7f9ca6918f80, program_name=0x7f9ca69e02b0) at ../Modules/main.c:360 #19 pymain_run_file (config=0xa6a120 <_PyRuntime+59904>) at ../Modules/main.c:379 #20 pymain_run_python (exitcode=0x7fffcf0f5a64) at ../Modules/main.c:601 #21 Py_RunMain () at ../Modules/main.c:680 #22 0x006275c7 in Py_BytesMain (argc=, argv=) at ../Modules/main.c:734 #23 0x7f9ca6a1c1ca in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #24 0x7fffcf0f5c80 in ?? () #25 0x00627530 in frame_dummy () #26 0x000300400040 in ?? () #27 0x7fffcf0f5c98 in ?? () #28 0x7fffcf0f5c98 in ?? () #29 0x108cfa692055372a in ?? () #30 0x in ?? () Another case: Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f9ca69f4040 (LWP 115) "unattended-upgr"): #0 0x7f9ca643818d in _dbus_header_cache_check (field=5, header=0x9156278) at ../../../dbus/dbus-marshal-header.c:252 #1 _dbus_header_get_field_basic (header=header@entry=0x9156278, field=field@entry=5, type=type@entry=117, value=value@entry=0x7fffcf0f5484) at ../../../dbus/dbus-marshal-header.c:1374 #2 0x7f9ca643cde1 in dbus_message_get_reply_serial (message=message@entry=0x9156270) at ../../../dbus/dbus-message.c:1202 #3 0x7f9ca6432034 in check_for_reply_unlocked (client_serial=3814221, connection=0x2a0f1e0) at ../../../dbus/dbus-connection.c:2287 #4 check_for_reply_and_update_dispatch_unlocked (connection=connection@entry=0x2a0f1e0, pending=pending@entry=0x2a40c60) at ../../../dbus/dbus-connection.c:2355 #5 0x7f9ca6432233 in _dbus_connection_block_pending_call (pending=0x2a40c60) at ../../../dbus/dbus-connection.c:2474 #6 0x7f9ca644404a in dbus_pending_call_block (pending=) at ../../../dbus/dbus-pending-call.c:768 #7 0x7f9ca6432872 in dbus_connection_send_with_reply_and_block (connection=0x
[Bug 244250] Re: Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades.
The reason I want to remove the code is that it wasn't meant for Desktop. It works on Desktop when using wayland but this is was definitely not the intent back then. As I say in https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+git/openssl/+merge/466581 , I don't think the postinst can be fixed due the behavior not having been specified: you can't fix something if the intent is unknown. I am saddened that needrestart is not on desktop machines but on the other hand, the code has probably never really worked fine for the past 10 or 15 years. It's not like we would be removing something that works in favor of something that isn't ready. By the way, I run a server install on my laptop unfortunately so I experience the needrestart path. That being said, I've only heard complaints about the current postinst. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244250 Title: Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/244250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067384] Re: openssl: merge 3.2.1-3 from unstable
** Description changed: Unstable has openssl 3.2.1 which is need to fix some tests for nodejs and some features for cryptsetup and is a good step to 3.3 for 24.10. + + Merge request: + https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+git/openssl/+merge/466581 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067384 Title: openssl: merge 3.2.1-3 from unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2067384/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058017] Re: openssl is not LTO-safe
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058017 Title: openssl is not LTO-safe To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2058017/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067384] [NEW] openssl: merge 3.2.1-3 from unstable
Public bug reported: Unstable has openssl 3.2.1 which is need to fix some tests for nodejs and some features for cryptsetup and is a good step to 3.3 for 24.10. ** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Adrien Nader (adrien) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067384 Title: openssl: merge 3.2.1-3 from unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2067384/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 244250] Re: Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades.
I did some archeology because I'm trying to get rid of the Ubuntu delta compared to Debian. I think the code change in 1.0.0e-2ubuntu3 is problematic. No blame: the shell script was already hairy and difficult to understand and in order to spot that, I had to identify a chunk of dead code, remove it, and come back on the script again months later. In short, I'm going to drop the postinst. The current code is easier to read as it's shorter: if [ "$1" = "configure" ] then if [ ! -z "$2" ] && [ ! -x /usr/lib/needrestart/apt-pinvoke ] ; then if ! pidof /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg > /dev/null && [ -x /usr/share/update-notifier/notify-reboot-required ]; then /usr/share/update-notifier/notify-reboot-required fi fi fi IOW, apt-pinvoke must be chmod -x (i.e. we're on Desktop), X must not be running (i.e. we're on Server), then we'll call notify-reboot-required. Of course, with wayland now, you could be on desktop with a GUI and pass the pidof test. Still, that's not the intent and wasn't. Pidof is a poor proxy and I'll rather remove the code than add another special case. I could _maybe_ be convinced of removing the pidof test but keeping the apt-pinvoke one though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244250 Title: Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/244250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066024] [NEW] eso-midas: please remove due to FTBFS
Public bug reported: Please remove eso-midas. eso-midas FTBFS on all architectures due to a crash when running its testuite (which it does during package building), this is the issue described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eso- midas/+bug/2058971 . It was first noticed with time_t changes but is not related to time_t. This is probably due to _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 and the issue doesn't happen on Debian it seems (no ftbfs there). It is not a spurious error though. The crux is the following backtrace excerpt: #7 0x77ed39e5 in snprintf (__fmt=0x77f0dbc7 "%10d", __n=88, __s=0x77f7168a "") at /usr/include/x86_64-linux- gnu/bits/stdio2.h:54 Relevant code is: for (nr=0; nr<(n2-n1)*10; nr+=10) (void) snprintf(&work[nr],(size_t)88,"%10d",KIWORDS[koffs++]); The project's code is quite obscure, mostly undocumented, previous- millenium grade and even without considering all of this, is quite certainly wrong because the buffer offset (&work[nr]) moves forward due to the loop but the "88" is not decreased accordingly. I don't understand the code or its usage enough to be confident I can produce an appropriate fix, especially since the code is structured that way in order to format values in a specific way (which is unknown to me). For the past 10 years or so, upstream has only been doing maintenance: there was actually an update in February 2023. However there are tons of warnings about buffer overflows, especially s(n)printf-related, and the current issue flew under the radar: that's quite telling of how many problems there probably are. It is (very) low-popcon: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=eso- midas There are no reverse-depend besides astro-frameworks (Debian Astro Team) which Recommends it. For completeness, I should mention there are reverse-test-triggers however: fitsverify, missfits, stiff. Contacting upstream involves using a mailing-list which you can do through an HTML form on https://www.eso.org/sci/software/esomidas/midas- mailform.html . The list is pre-moderated, there are no public archives and I wasn't able to use the HTML and/or craft appropriate messages to get archives (or anything at all) in my inbox; I didn't get error messages either. At that point, I gave up (we don't have proof either that there wouldn't be subsequent failures). For all of the above, I think it is appropriate to remove eso-midas. I am however unsure about preventing future syncs because a) maybe the next update will fix the issue, b) it's a slow-changing package so there won't be a lot of noise. ** Affects: eso-midas (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066024 Title: eso-midas: please remove due to FTBFS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eso-midas/+bug/2066024/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058971] Re: proposed-migration for eso-midas 23.02pl1.0-1build1
For reference, backtrace of the issue (I've inserted a call to gdb for "prepa.exe" in the "inmidas" shell script. There are tons of fortify warnings during build. Also, note that the Debian maintainer disabled implicit function declarations, citing that the code is very old, and indeed, it started in the 80s. *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x77be7b1c in pthread_kill () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x77be7b1c in pthread_kill () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #1 0x77b8e26e in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #2 0x77b718ff in abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #3 0x77b727b6 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #4 0x77c7fc19 in __fortify_fail () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #5 0x77c7f5d4 in __chk_fail () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #6 0x77c80db5 in __snprintf_chk () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #7 0x77ed39e5 in snprintf (__fmt=0x77f0dbc7 "%10d", __n=88, __s=0x77f7168a "") at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:54 #8 MID_DSPKEY (name=name@entry=0x555a5778 "myvals", dflag=63 '?') at midkeya.c:494 #9 0x55580869 in DO_KEYS (key_task=key_task@entry=82 'R', prompt=prompt@entry=0x7fffdc10 "T") at prepc4.c:197 #10 0x5557f28f in prepx (kswitch=, cxpntr=cxpntr@entry=0x5559f480 " 23FEBpl1.0 PC/Linux", ' ' , "-23.02pl1.0/midwork/MIDAS01.PID", ixpntr=ixpntr@entry=0x7fffdf90) at prepx.c:748 #11 0xac53 in main () at prepa.c:168 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058971 Title: proposed-migration for eso-midas 23.02pl1.0-1build1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eso-midas/+bug/2058971/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059287] Re: Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed)
Removed the request to badtest this (it was denied anyway). ** Description changed: Autopkgtests for request-tracker4 (and 5 it seems) fail on all arches and due to the recent changes around test environments and the use of all-proposed, it's difficult to identify which package change is responsible. I actually see some passes on amd64 and arm64 but due to the environment issues that existed when the tests ran, I can't conclude much from them. Moreover, they weren't running with all-proposed like they would now. I also didn't see triggers related to gpg which could have been useful hints even with unreliable environment considering the errors. - Please badtest request-tracker4 and request-tracker5. - The typical errors are https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest- noble/noble/arm64/r/request-tracker4/20240326_183841_3725f@/log.gz - 2470s t/security/CVE-2012-4735-incoming-encryption-header.t .. + 2470s t/security/CVE-2012-4735-incoming-encryption-header.t .. 2470s # GnuPG --homedir /tmp/WbcjpQjcFA 2470s ok 1 - created a ticket 2470s ok 2 - loaded ticket 2470s ok 3 - Found the right attachment 2470s ok 4 - Incoming encryption header is removed 2470s ok 5 - Incoming signature header is removed 2470s ok 6 - created a ticket 2470s not ok 7 - 2470s + 2470s 2470s # Failed test at t/security/CVE-2012-4735-incoming-encryption-header.t line 60. 2470s # found warning: gpg: keybox '/tmp/WbcjpQjcFA/pubring.kbx' created 2470s # found warning: Failure during GnuPG data: No data has been found. The reason is 'Invalid packet found' 2470s # found warning: Failure during GnuPG data: No data has been found. The reason is 'No armored data' 2470s # found warning: Failure during GnuPG gpg-exit: Failed to gpg-exit 2470s # expected to find warning: (?^:(?:keyring|keybox) .* created) 2470s # expected to find warning: (?^:Failure during GnuPG data: No data has been found\. The reason is 'Invalid packet found') 2470s # expected to find warning: (?^:Failure during GnuPG data: No data has been found\. The reason is 'No armored data') 2470s ok 8 - loaded ticket 2470s ok 9 - Found the right attachment 2470s ok 10 - Incoming encryption header is removed 2470s ok 11 - Incoming signature header is removed 2470s ok 12 - no warnings 2470s 1..12 2470s # Some tests failed or we bailed out, tmp directory '/tmp/autopkgtest.z5x7lQ/autopkgtest_tmp/smokeFWUfP9/t/tmp/security-CVE-2012-4735-incoming-encryption-header.t-kZdETulR' is not cleaned - or https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest- noble/noble/ppc64el/r/request-tracker4/20240323_184121_31e59@/log.gz 727s # encryption only, bad recipient 727s not ok 43 - 727s + 727s 727s # Failed test at t/mail/crypt-gnupg.t line 180. 727s # didn't find a warning 727s # expected to find warning: (?^:No public key|public key not found) 727s not ok 44 - no way to encrypt without keys of recipients - 727s + 727s 727s # Failed test 'no way to encrypt without keys of recipients' 727s # at t/mail/crypt-gnupg.t line 182. 1569s ok 71 - RT's mail includes this instance's name 1569s not ok 72 - 1569s + 1569s 1569s # Failed test at t/web/crypt-gnupg.t line 382. 1569s # didn't find a warning 1569s # expected to find warning: (?^:nokey\@example.com: skipped: (?:No public key|public key not found)) 1569s # expected to find warning: (?^:Recipient 'nokey\@example.com' is unusable) 1569s ok 73 - created ticket for owner-without-pubkey 1569s ok 74 - created ticket for owner-with-pubkey 1569s not ok 75 - 1569s + 1569s 1569s # Failed test at t/web/crypt-gnupg.t line 404. 1569s # didn't find a warning 1569s # expected to find warning: (?^:nokey\@example.com: skipped: (?:No public key|public key not found)) 1569s # expected to find warning: (?^:Recipient 'nokey\@example.com' is unusable) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059287 Title: Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/request-tracker4/+bug/2059287/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058971] Re: proposed-migration for eso-midas 23.02pl1.0-1build1
Build now fails on all arches with # of pixels used = 843920 from 1,1 to 880,959 (in pixels) FITS file newVIMOS.fits will have 4 extensions *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated This is the same issue as back in March when this bug was created (I had seen the issue and found it again in my logs). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058971 Title: proposed-migration for eso-midas 23.02pl1.0-1build1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eso-midas/+bug/2058971/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063271] Re: Illegal opcode in libssl
AFAIU there is no issue in the package at the moment so I'll close the report. Thanks for investigating and trying the package reinstallation. (Also, Alex, impressive intuition!) ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063271 Title: Illegal opcode in libssl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2063271/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1297025] Re: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297025 Title: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1297025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1297025] Re: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package
I plan to work on this during the OO cycle. It's an issue inherited from Debian AFAIU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297025 Title: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1297025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063898] Re: broken doc symlinks after t64 transition in noble
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1297025 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297025 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1297025 Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063898 Title: broken doc symlinks after t64 transition in noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2063898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062118] Re: autopkgtests fail on s390x (segfault)
** Tags added: rls-oo-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062118 Title: autopkgtests fail on s390x (segfault) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2062118/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062119] Re: autopkgtests fail on ppc64el
** Tags added: rls-oo-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062119 Title: autopkgtests fail on ppc64el To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtracefs/+bug/2062119/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062018] Re: [FFe] gnutls28: merge 3.8.5-2 and backport RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 fix
** Changed in: gnutls28 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062018 Title: [FFe] gnutls28: merge 3.8.5-2 and backport RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 fix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/2062018/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062167] Re: [FFe] openssl: post-3.0.13 changes from git
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062167 Title: [FFe] openssl: post-3.0.13 changes from git To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2062167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062167] Re: [FFe] openssl: post-3.0.13 changes from git
Note that there is a CVE fix in there too. It's low-severity because it's only unbounded memory growth but it's quite easy to trigger and I think that anyone who has a webserver with TLS 1.3 will want it patched. Therefore there should be an upload of this at least. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062167 Title: [FFe] openssl: post-3.0.13 changes from git To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2062167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062167] [NEW] [FFe] openssl: post-3.0.13 changes from git
Public bug reported: I would like to have the most recent openssl version possible in Noble. For that I am requesting to upload all the commits in the openssl-3.0 branch that follow 3.0.13 which is already in the archive. I would like to include 3.0.14 afterwards if feasible. Having the most recent commits of the 3.0 branch will make that easier. I went through all commits since 3.0.13 at the end of January. I skipped a few which touch files that are not in the 3.0.13 release tarball (github CI stuff mostly) and edited one that touched such a file. There are only fixes. This is not surprising considering we are past the 13th patch release for openssl 3.0, and almost 3 years after 3.0 was released. Changes are most usually backports which is a good thing as it means they are also tested in the other branches, including through 3.3, for which the .0 release was published a few days ago after weeks in beta/RC. There are a few behaviour tweaks, and that is why I want to get as close as possible to what 3.0.14 will be. The bigger one is ad6cbe4b7f57a783a66a7ae883ea0d35ef5f82b6: Revert "Improved detection of engine-provided private "classic" keys", which also states "The workaround has caused more problems than it solved." As I said, I went through all commits. All look safe to me. The question really boils down to whether we will include these fixes in Noble now or if we won't: there is only a very very small chance that any given change is SRU'ed afterwards. ** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062167 Title: [FFe] openssl: post-3.0.13 changes from git To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2062167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062018] [NEW] [FFe] gnutls28: merge 3.8.5-2 and backport RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 fix
Public bug reported: Please allow the merge and upload of https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+git/gnutls28/+merge/464535 . I made the commit message there quite complete so I'm basically copying that here. In a few words, this is meant to include as many fixes as possible (potentially including security ones) since they probably would linger on afterwards. There is also a change regarding PKCS#1 v1.5 which has been deprecated but seemingly kept the same status in gnutls; this adds the recommended replacement and makes it possible to disable the deprecated format in configuration. This is the kind of things we want for LTS releases. Moreover, there are no changes that we want to avoid. There are changes we don't care (much) about (tests, static builds, ...), but no changes we want to avoid. Below is a copy of the commit message of the MR. This is a late update to gnutls in order to include the most recent security fixes, even if they are low-severity. It merges 3.8.5-2 from Debian and includes a better fix for the issue that prompted the upload of -2 (wrong default configuration if no config file is present). There are fixes except one potential performance improvement. Some of the fixes are about catching up with current standards. I went through all commits, there are many varied changes. I'm skipping updates to tests or changes that are not relevant to Ubuntu. Basic fixes: - ktls detection (possibly a regression in noble) - memleak in gnutls-serv - segfault in _gnutls13_recv_end_of_early_data - potential segfault in _gnutls13_recv_finished - missing argument when using the _gnutls_debug_log macro - wrong test in lib/mpi.c Misc changes that are still somewhat notable: - nettle: plumb RIPEMD160, because GCR (commit says "GnuTLS", I think it's a typo) still uses it to display a fingerprint for openpgp keys - x509: support PBES1-DES-SHA1, in order to parse legacy PKCS#8 files in GCR (the gnome library) The one performance improvement (that I didn't benchmark): "Make compression libraries dynamically loadable" (it's from January, not April). Finally, a fix to adapt gnutls to current standards: support RSA-OAEP and make it possible to disable RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5. I think it is important this gets into Noble due to the long support period. Moreover, it can come in handy in the future to be able to disable algorithms when flaws are discovered. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8017#section-7 : > RSAES-OAEP is REQUIRED to be supported for new applications; RSAES- PKCS1-v1_5 is included only for compatibility with existing applications. ** Affects: gnutls28 (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062018 Title: [FFe] gnutls28: merge 3.8.5-2 and backport RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 fix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/2062018/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2051925] Re: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency
Matching MR is up: https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/libtracefs/+git/libtracefs/+merge/464434 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051925 Title: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtracefs/+bug/2051925/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
