[Bug 1273386] Re: Neutron namespace metadata proxy triggers kernel crash on Ubuntu 12.04/3.2 kernel
Stefan, what's the most important thing we could do to help you help us? I see a few threads of inquiry in the comments that trailed off: - abstracting Salvatore's script for high thrash rates on VM creation/destruction and network namespace creation, to try reproducing the issue without running openstack - ext4 vs ext3 - capturing crashdumps from a devstack gate run (or simulated gate run on a local machine) - determining whether the failure is a regression from a previous version of the kernel (seems not) - determining whether the failure occurs on 3.11 kernel in addition to 3.2 kernel (seems it does) What looks most promising? This is a critical issue, and still producing intermittent failures, so it's worth a prod or two on the OpenStack side to get things rolling again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1273386 Title: Neutron namespace metadata proxy triggers kernel crash on Ubuntu 12.04/3.2 kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1273386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1181643] [NEW] Display error (full-screen) on resizing table cell
Public bug reported: I really don't know if this is Unity or LibreOffice, or some unfortunate incompatibility in API usage between the two. But, when I click and drag the divider to resize a table cell in a LibreOffice Writer document, the entire screen turns to hashed garbage (see attached screenshot). As soon as I release the mouse click, the screen snaps back to normal (and if I moved the mouse while pressed down, the table cell is successfully resized). This is LibreOffice 4.0.2.2, on Ubuntu 13.04. ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: Screenshot from 2013-05-18 17:55:42.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1181643/+attachment/3680552/+files/Screenshot%20from%202013-05-18%2017%3A55%3A42.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1181643 Title: Display error (full-screen) on resizing table cell To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1181643/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1106378] Re: FTBFS: encoding issue in manual override of dh_auto_test
** Changed in: libsvn-web-perl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106378 Title: FTBFS: encoding issue in manual override of dh_auto_test To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsvn-web-perl/+bug/1106378/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269542] Re: Missing dependencies
libtemplate-plugin-number-format has been in universe since lucid. Current versions of the libsvn-web-perl package depend on both libtimedate-perl and libtemplate-plugin-number-format. Closing this bug as no longer relevant. ** Changed in: libsvn-web-perl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269542 Title: Missing dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsvn-web-perl/+bug/269542/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1106378] [NEW] FTBFS: encoding issue in manual override of dh_auto_test
Public bug reported: The libsvn-web-perl package is currently FTBFS in raring-proposed. This is a sync of the Debian package libsvn-web-perl version 0.63-1. The FTBFS consists of three test failures in t/2basic.t, all receiving this error from svn: Can't convert string from 'UTF-8' to native encoding... Here's the full build log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/121688829/buildlog_ubuntu-raring-i386 .libsvn-web-perl_0.63-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz Those tests are intentionally trying to save unicode file names, but the buildds apparently don't have UTF-8 encoding set in the environment, so subversion refuses to handle the UTF-8 strings. There's a partial fix for this in the Debian package for 0.63-1, debian/rules sets an override for dh_auto_test, setting the LC_CTYPE environment variable, with: override_dh_auto_test: dh_auto_test -- LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 Unfortunately, this is not sufficient (perhaps it is sufficient on the Debian buildds, but not on the Ubuntu buildds). On Ubuntu, this needs to be changed to: override_dh_auto_test: dh_auto_test -- LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 With this change, all tests pass, and the package builds successfully on Ubuntu raring i386 and amd64. I'll also submit this fix upstream to Debian BTS. (I'll submit a merge proposal for raring-proposed, but I'm open minded about whether it's worth an Ubuntu-versioned package for a one-line change to debian/rules.) ** Affects: libsvn-web-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ftbfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106378 Title: FTBFS: encoding issue in manual override of dh_auto_test To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsvn-web-perl/+bug/1106378/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1106378] Re: FTBFS: encoding issue in manual override of dh_auto_test
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #699062 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699062 ** Also affects: libsvn-web-perl (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699062 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106378 Title: FTBFS: encoding issue in manual override of dh_auto_test To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsvn-web-perl/+bug/1106378/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1106378] Re: FTBFS: encoding issue in manual override of dh_auto_test
Merge proposal at: https://code.launchpad.net/~allison/ubuntu/raring /libsvn-web-perl/fix-for-1106378/+merge/145072 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1106378 Title: FTBFS: encoding issue in manual override of dh_auto_test To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsvn-web-perl/+bug/1106378/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 659332] Re: New version bump request for Password Gorilla
This update needs to be done upstream in Debian. Ubuntu will sync the updated package. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #698665 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698665 ** Also affects: password-gorilla (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698665 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659332 Title: New version bump request for Password Gorilla To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/password-gorilla/+bug/659332/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539832] Re: Password Gorilla doesn't allow text entry after opening password safe
This bug applies to an old version of the package. I have thoroughly tested it in daily use over many months, and cannot duplicate the bug. ** Changed in: password-gorilla (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539832 Title: Password Gorilla doesn't allow text entry after opening password safe To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/password-gorilla/+bug/539832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1012619] Re: Crashes with group name can not be empty
Do you know if the pwsafe file was v3 format? Debian has a nearly identical bug report. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #522275 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522275 ** Also affects: password-gorilla (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522275 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012619 Title: Crashes with group name can not be empty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/password-gorilla/+bug/1012619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 819145] Re: Update gpsdrive to 2.11
The update to 2.11 should be done upstream in Debian. The Ubuntu- specific changes have mostly been merged into Debian, it's likely we'll be able to sync the package after Debian updates to 2.11. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819145 Title: Update gpsdrive to 2.11 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpsdrive/+bug/819145/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1099027] [NEW] Please merge gnumeric 1.12.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable
Public bug reported: I've attached a debdiff for a traditional merge of gnumeric, since it is not up-to-date in the UDD branches due to an import failure. It had to be manually merged because of a conflict in the Build-Depends lines of debian/control (all trivial, some entries on different lines, and some version updates to dependencies for gnumeric 1.12.0). This is a desirable version update from Debian, since it moves the package from gtk2 to gtk3. However, it is currently blocked by the goffice package, which also requires a manual merge from Debian to get version 0.10.0-1. (Version 1.12.0 of gnumeric requires libgoffice-0.10-dev = 0.10.0, but the current version in raring is libgoffice-0.8-dev at 0.8.17.) Also note that gnumeric gnumeric_1.12.0-1 is not built for all architectures yet on Debian. This merge drops one Ubuntu patch, a manual call to intltool-update, as it was causing a build failure, apparently conflicting with the new use of dh_autotools-dev_updateconfig in the Debian packages. That leaves only one Ubuntu-specific change in the attached debdiff. ** Affects: gnumeric (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: gnumeric_1.12.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099027/+attachment/3481616/+files/gnumeric_1.12.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099027 Title: Please merge gnumeric 1.12.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnumeric/+bug/1099027/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1048093] Re: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
** Description changed: (Tracking some collaborative work with persia) A review of RC bugs from Debian shows 4 CVEs fixed in the latest Debian release. This includes 2 CVEs fixed in an upstream (bug-fix level) - release, and 2 fixed in Debian. Currently verifying that a merge is - clean and minimal, for a possible FFe. + release, and 2 fixed in Debian. Update: this Debian release has now been + merged to quantal, see LP: #1022360 Applying these fixes to Precise SRU would require cherrypicking. - Unknown if these CVEs affect earlier Ubuntu releases also. + All CVEs affect only 1.8.x series of asterisk, so no work is needed for + releases earlier than precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1048093] Re: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #680470 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680470 ** Also affects: asterisk (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680470 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1048093] Re: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
** Description changed: (Tracking some collaborative work with persia) A review of RC bugs from Debian shows 4 CVEs fixed in the latest Debian release. This includes 2 CVEs fixed in an upstream (bug-fix level) release, and 2 fixed in Debian. Update: this Debian release has now been merged to quantal, see LP: #1022360 - Applying these fixes to Precise SRU would require cherrypicking. + The patch for AST-2012-012 (CVE-2012-4737) from Debian 1:1.8.13.1~dfsg-1 + does not apply cleanly to precise package 1:1.8.10.1~dfsg-1ubuntu1. The + patch modifies code already changed by AST-2012-004 and other merged + changes from upstream 1.4 and 1.6 series (see r314628, r363141, + r364841). The change is too disruptive for inclusion in precise SRU, and + severity is only rated as Minor. - All CVEs affect only 1.8.x series of asterisk, so no work is needed for - releases earlier than precise. + + Fixes for the other 3 CVEs have been cherrypicked to precise asterisk package: + + [Impact] + DoS exploits for voice mail and re-invite transactions, ACL bypass for IAX2 peer calls. + + [Test Cases] + Steps to reproduce each issue provided in upstream bug reports: + https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-19992 + https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20052 + https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20186 + + Testers will need to install both 'asterisk' and 'asterisk-voicemail' + packages. A simple asterisk configuration is attached to the bug report. + + [Regression Potential] + Minimal, no known regressions in asterisk issue tracker or Debian BTS. + + + Also recommend 1:1.8.13.1~dfsg-1ubuntu1 for possible precise Backport (from quantal). It includes some feature additions and many non-critical fixes (too many to SRU the whole package), sufficient for some users to prefer the more recent version. + + It is unlikely that cherrypicked patches for precise will apply cleanly + to oneiric, given the code drift between 1.8.4 and 1.8.10. All CVEs + affect only 1.8.x series of asterisk, so no work is needed for releases + earlier than oneiric. ** Attachment added: Simplistic Asterisk config for SRU testers https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+attachment/3304538/+files/simple_asterisk_config.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1048093] Re: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
Yes, jtaylor made the quantal release last night. I've linked in a branch with an SRU candidate for precise. Nominated for precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1048093] Re: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
** Description changed: (Tracking some collaborative work with persia) A review of RC bugs from Debian shows 4 CVEs fixed in the latest Debian release. This includes 2 CVEs fixed in an upstream (bug-fix level) - release, and 2 fixed in Debian. Currently verifying that a merge is - clean and minimal, for a possible FFe. + release, and 2 fixed in Debian. Update: this Debian release has now been + merged to quantal, see LP: #1022360 Applying these fixes to Precise SRU would require cherrypicking. - Unknown if these CVEs affect earlier Ubuntu releases also. + All CVEs affect only 1.8.x series of asterisk, so no work is needed for + releases earlier than precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1048093] Re: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #680470 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680470 ** Also affects: asterisk (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680470 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1048093] Re: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
** Description changed: (Tracking some collaborative work with persia) A review of RC bugs from Debian shows 4 CVEs fixed in the latest Debian release. This includes 2 CVEs fixed in an upstream (bug-fix level) release, and 2 fixed in Debian. Update: this Debian release has now been merged to quantal, see LP: #1022360 - Applying these fixes to Precise SRU would require cherrypicking. + The patch for AST-2012-012 (CVE-2012-4737) from Debian 1:1.8.13.1~dfsg-1 + does not apply cleanly to precise package 1:1.8.10.1~dfsg-1ubuntu1. The + patch modifies code already changed by AST-2012-004 and other merged + changes from upstream 1.4 and 1.6 series (see r314628, r363141, + r364841). The change is too disruptive for inclusion in precise SRU, and + severity is only rated as Minor. - All CVEs affect only 1.8.x series of asterisk, so no work is needed for - releases earlier than precise. + + Fixes for the other 3 CVEs have been cherrypicked to precise asterisk package: + + [Impact] + DoS exploits for voice mail and re-invite transactions, ACL bypass for IAX2 peer calls. + + [Test Cases] + Steps to reproduce each issue provided in upstream bug reports: + https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-19992 + https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20052 + https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20186 + + Testers will need to install both 'asterisk' and 'asterisk-voicemail' + packages. A simple asterisk configuration is attached to the bug report. + + [Regression Potential] + Minimal, no known regressions in asterisk issue tracker or Debian BTS. + + + Also recommend 1:1.8.13.1~dfsg-1ubuntu1 for possible precise Backport (from quantal). It includes some feature additions and many non-critical fixes (too many to SRU the whole package), sufficient for some users to prefer the more recent version. + + It is unlikely that cherrypicked patches for precise will apply cleanly + to oneiric, given the code drift between 1.8.4 and 1.8.10. All CVEs + affect only 1.8.x series of asterisk, so no work is needed for releases + earlier than oneiric. ** Attachment added: Simplistic Asterisk config for SRU testers https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+attachment/3304538/+files/simple_asterisk_config.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1048093] Re: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
Yes, jtaylor made the quantal release last night. I've linked in a branch with an SRU candidate for precise. Nominated for precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1048093] [NEW] Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
Public bug reported: Reviewing RC bugs from Debian shows 2 CVEs fixed in upstream bug-fix release 1.8.13.1, and 2 additional CVEs fixed in latest Debian release. ** Affects: asterisk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1048093] Re: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-3863 ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2186 ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-4737 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1048093] Re: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
** Description changed: - Reviewing RC bugs from Debian shows 2 CVEs fixed in upstream bug-fix - release 1.8.13.1, and 2 additional CVEs fixed in latest Debian release. + (Tracking some collaborative work with persia) + + A review of RC bugs from Debian shows 4 CVEs fixed in the latest Debian + release. This includes 2 CVEs fixed in an upstream (bug-fix level) + release, and 2 fixed in Debian. Currently verifying that a merge is + clean and minimal, for a possible FFe. + + Applying these fixes to Precise SRU would require cherrypicking. + + Unknown if these CVEs affect earlier Ubuntu releases also. ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-3812 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1048093] [NEW] Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
Public bug reported: Reviewing RC bugs from Debian shows 2 CVEs fixed in upstream bug-fix release 1.8.13.1, and 2 additional CVEs fixed in latest Debian release. ** Affects: asterisk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1048093] Re: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-3863 ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-2186 ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-4737 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1048093] Re: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk
** Description changed: - Reviewing RC bugs from Debian shows 2 CVEs fixed in upstream bug-fix - release 1.8.13.1, and 2 additional CVEs fixed in latest Debian release. + (Tracking some collaborative work with persia) + + A review of RC bugs from Debian shows 4 CVEs fixed in the latest Debian + release. This includes 2 CVEs fixed in an upstream (bug-fix level) + release, and 2 fixed in Debian. Currently verifying that a merge is + clean and minimal, for a possible FFe. + + Applying these fixes to Precise SRU would require cherrypicking. + + Unknown if these CVEs affect earlier Ubuntu releases also. ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2012-3812 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048093 Title: Outstanding security fixes in asterisk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/1048093/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1021401] Re: package scratch 1.1-0~r766+pkg21~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 2
You seem to have an older scratch package installed (possibly from the earlier PPA?), as the error message refers to scratch 1.1-0~r766+pkg21~precise1 Try uninstalling the scratch package entirely, and then reinstalling it. sudo apt-get remove scratch sudo apt-get install scratch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021401 Title: package scratch 1.1-0~r766+pkg21~precise1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scratch/+bug/1021401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 903843] Re: pyglet apps appear as panel in the Launcher
** Tags added: arb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903843 Title: pyglet apps appear as panel in the Launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bamf/+bug/903843/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 735601] Re: [STAGING] Scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x00000100; RIP: 0010:[ffffffff813354ca] [ffffffff813354ca] intel_idle+0xca/0x120
I'm still running that netbook with intel_idle.max_cstate=0 in GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT. I'll remove that, and run through the tests you requested. I can at least say the netbook has been working fine through upgrades to Natty, Oneiric, and Precise for months now with intel_idle.max_cstate=0 enabled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735601 Title: [STAGING] Scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x0100; RIP: 0010:[813354ca] [813354ca] intel_idle+0xca/0x120 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/735601/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 935525] Re: libglib-perl version 2:1.241-1 FTBFS on i386 in precise
This is a heisenbug because it's a simple race condition. It's not a
failure in the package build, only in the automated tests. The lines
just before 267 of the test file t/9.t are:
264 $timer_id = Glib::Timeout-add
265 (30_000, # 30 seconds should be more than enough for child exit
266 sub { die Oops, child watch callback didn't run\n; });
The test is assuming that 30 seconds are long enough for a child process
to complete, but on certain slower/constrained processors (like a
buildd, or a netbook) that estimate is too short, so the test fails. On
my Precise netbook (Asus EeePC N550 @ 1.50GHz × 4) the test consistently
fails, but if I bump that timeout up to 60 seconds it consistently
passes. That timing is not exact, and an ideal fix would be event-based
rather than wallclock seconds, but doubling the time allowed is
generous. Alternatively, you can ignore the FTBFS, since it's only a
sign of a slow buildd, not of any more serious problem.
I've attached the patch file I added in my bzr checkout of the package
for a longer timeout.
** Attachment added: lengthen the timeout, so the test passes for slower
processors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/libglib-perl/+bug/935525/+attachment/2913794/+files/fix-timeout
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935525
Title:
libglib-perl version 2:1.241-1 FTBFS on i386 in precise
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libglib-perl/+bug/935525/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 946539] [NEW] gnome-session removed during partial upgrade to Precise Beta1
Public bug reported: During a partial upgrade to Precise Beta1 last night, update-manager removed a large number of packages, including gnome-session. The machine would boot to the login screen, but logging in (with the correct password) would simply return to the login screen again with no error message. The login screen also gave no options for different sessions (Ubuntu, Ubuntu 2D, etc). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: update-manager 1:0.156.6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.27-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl ApportVersion: 1.94-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Mar 4 10:24:46 2012 GsettingsChanges: com.ubuntu.update-manager first-run false com.ubuntu.update-manager launch-time 1330885434 com.ubuntu.update-manager show-details true com.ubuntu.update-manager window-height 546 com.ubuntu.update-manager window-width 600 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: update-manager UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-03-04 (0 days ago) ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/946539 Title: gnome-session removed during partial upgrade to Precise Beta1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/946539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 946539] Re: gnome-session removed during partial upgrade to Precise Beta1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/946539 Title: gnome-session removed during partial upgrade to Precise Beta1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/946539/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 903843] [NEW] pyglet apps appear as panel in the Launcher
Public bug reported: All pyglet apps appear in the Launcher as if the app name is panel, and the Launcher shows multiple windows for the app, even though there is only one window. I've attached a screenshot of the Launcher. You can duplicate the problem simply by installing the python-pyglet package and then running: $ python from pyglet import window window.Window() Clicking on the Launcher also takes you to the choose between the windows spread, but with only one window in the spread. I'm guessing this is bamf-related. ** Affects: pyglet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903843 Title: pyglet apps appear as panel in the Launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyglet/+bug/903843/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 903843] Re: pyglet apps appear as panel in the Launcher
** Attachment added: screenshot of Launcher with pyglet app https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903843/+attachment/2631589/+files/pyglet-launcher.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903843 Title: pyglet apps appear as panel in the Launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyglet/+bug/903843/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786516] Re: pyglet error: No standard config is available.
python-pyglet_1.1.4.dfsg-2 shipped in Oneiric, this is now fixed. If you need the newer version of pyglet in older releases, please request a backport. ** Changed in: pyglet (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786516 Title: pyglet error: No standard config is available. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyglet/+bug/786516/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 381154] Re: Any pyglet program causes a segmentation fault.
This is not an issue in Oneiric, which ships version 1.1.4.dfsg-2. If you need the newer version in an older release, please request a backport. ** Changed in: pyglet (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381154 Title: Any pyglet program causes a segmentation fault. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyglet/+bug/381154/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882274] Re: Community engagement is broken
This comment is written with love. A bug report isn't the best place to work through relationship issues, but this comment thread is unhealthy enough that I don't want to leave it standing as-is. Just a brief note here, but what really matters aren't words but actions over time. The Ubuntu community (and I include Canonical as part of that community) has fallen into some unhealthy habits. We've been together for 7 years now, and over the years we've started to take each other for granted. For the community to survive, and for Ubuntu to succeed, this has to change. I was greatly encouraged by UDS-P two weeks ago. For those who didn't attend: things are changing around here, for the better. As one concrete example, we're starting up a team of volunteer designers to work on user journeys across the entire distro. The Unity designers have (joyfully, gladly, and with great enthusiasm) agreed to participate with this team, to share their knowledge and experience, and learn from the knowledge and experience of others in the group. Today, it's just the smallest seed, a tiny trajectory shift, but it's change in the right direction. I have a different message for different parts of the community. For the Unity designers, my message is come out and play, don't worry, they won't bite. And for everyone else, my message is stop biting the Unity designers, you're scaring them away from open participation and if you see someone else biting the Unity designers, gently correct them and teach them how we collaborate around here. You see, communities only work when we *all* play our part in making them work. I love the Ubuntu community in its entirety, both volunteer and paid. I'm not promising you that the next 7 years will be easy, nothing worth doing ever is easy. But I am promising this: if we work together, what we build will be absolutely amazing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882274 Title: Community engagement is broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/882274/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 889340] [NEW] duplicate data for 'dia' package in Oneiric
Public bug reported: Searching for dia in the Software Center in Oneiric, the first two results are Diagram editor and Dia Diagram Editor. The first is installable, and has a normal set of info under More Info. The second has no Install button and gives me an error when I click More Info: -- Not found There isn't a software package called dia-gnome-gnome in your current software sources. -- Seems to be a data error, since they're both the same application, but I'm not sure where it's pulling the duplicate data from. ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889340 Title: duplicate data for 'dia' package in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/889340/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 784252] Re: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
It is a permissions problem. The quick manual fix for this is to change the user and group of the files /var/lib/backuppc/pc and /var/lib/backuppc/cpool to 'backuppc'. I'm working on a packaging fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784252 Title: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/784252/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 784252] Re: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
It is a permissions problem. The quick manual fix for this is to change the user and group of the files /var/lib/backuppc/pc and /var/lib/backuppc/cpool to 'backuppc'. I'm working on a packaging fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784252 Title: package backuppc 3.2.0-3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/784252/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 852484] Re: Merge backuppc 3.2.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
I've pushed a merged branch of backuppc 3.2.1-1ubuntu1 to lp:~allison/ubuntu/oneiric/backuppc/bug-852484. This is only a merge of the new upstream release containing security fixes, and does not fix any other bugs. (I'm working on those in different branches.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852484 Title: Merge backuppc 3.2.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/852484/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 852484] Re: Merge backuppc 3.2.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
I've pushed a merged branch of backuppc 3.2.1-1ubuntu1 to lp:~allison/ubuntu/oneiric/backuppc/bug-852484. This is only a merge of the new upstream release containing security fixes, and does not fix any other bugs. (I'm working on those in different branches.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852484 Title: Merge backuppc 3.2.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/852484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68729] Re: Loses all backups when disk is full
We're at 3.2.0 in Oneiric. Is there any indication that this bug still exists? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68729 Title: Loses all backups when disk is full To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/68729/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 68729] Re: Loses all backups when disk is full
We're at 3.2.0 in Oneiric. Is there any indication that this bug still exists? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68729 Title: Loses all backups when disk is full To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/68729/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 828162] Re: update-manager crashed with Package [u'nspluginviewer'] isn't available in _run()
Bug #762968 appears to be related to this one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828162 Title: update-manager crashed with Package [u'nspluginviewer'] isn't available in _run() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/828162/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762968] Re: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.159.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I got it today too. Possibly a multiarch problem? The package has a Depends ia32-libs. From https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- devel/2011-March/032750.html, I expected to be able to run: sudo apt-get install flashplugin-installer:i386 But that just reports: E: Unable to locate package flashplugin-installer:i386 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762968 Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.159.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/762968/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762968] Re: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.159.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Hmmm... nspluginwrapper isn't getting updated, because of a missing dependency on nspluginviewer: The following packages have unmet dependencies: nspluginwrapper: Depends: nspluginviewer (= 1.4.4-0ubuntu3) which is a virtual package. But, there doesn't seem to be any package available to satisfy nspluginviewer allison@otp:~$ sudo aptitude install nspluginviewer No candidate version found for nspluginviewer No candidate version found for nspluginviewer It appears that nspluginwrapper binary package exists in both i386 and amd64 architectures, but nspluginviewer only exists for i386. (http://packages.ubuntu.com/da/oneiric/nspluginviewer) In Natty, nspluginviewer didn't exist at all, and nspluginwrapper had no dependency on it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762968 Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.159.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/762968/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 762968] Re: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.159.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
It looks like this may be resolved when the fix for Bug #828162 is released. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762968 Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.2.159.1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/762968/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 820721] [NEW] Sync parrot 3.6.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync parrot 3.6.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current oneiric version 3.3.0-1: parrot (3.6.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release * debian/watch: - Modified regular expression to capture numbered directory name (patch from Dominique Dumont). * debian/rules: - Split build-arch and build-indep, resolving lintian warning. - Update path to pbc_disassemble for manpage generation (patch from Dominique Dumont). * debian/patches: - Added patch 02_fix_perl_interpreter_path.patch, resolving lintian warnings. * debian/control: - Added DM-Upload-Allowed field. -- Allison Randal alli...@parrot.org Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:45:03 +0200 ** Affects: parrot (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: parrot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820721 Title: Sync parrot 3.6.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parrot/+bug/820721/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790496] [NEW] FTBFS: znc depends on fix in swig 2.0.3 to work with Python 3.2
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: znc The znc package is FTBFS on Oneiric. This is noted in Debian as a version upgrade problem from Python 3.1 to 3.2. The failure messages are: compiler.cpp:(.text+0x19): undefined reference to `PyErr_Print' compiler.cpp:(.text+0x1e): undefined reference to `Py_Finalize' /tmp/ccLyjvoU.o: In function `main': compiler.cpp:(.text+0x49): undefined reference to `Py_Initialize' compiler.cpp:(.text+0x57): undefined reference to `PyImport_ImportModule' compiler.cpp:(.text+0x85): undefined reference to `PyObject_GetAttrString' compiler.cpp:(.text+0xab): undefined reference to `_Py_TrueStruct' compiler.cpp:(.text+0xd5): undefined reference to `Py_BuildValue' compiler.cpp:(.text+0x107): undefined reference to `Py_BuildValue' compiler.cpp:(.text+0x13b): undefined reference to `PyObject_Call' compiler.cpp:(.text+0x158): undefined reference to `Py_Finalize' (From https://launchpadlibrarian.net/71133981/buildlog_ubuntu- oneiric-i386.znc_0.098-2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz) This is fixed upstream in swig, and in the swig2.0 packages in Debian sid. Switching znc to the swig2.0 package might allow it to build with Python 3.2, but, as noted in the Debian bug report, it might also require additional porting. ** Affects: znc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: znc (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: ftbfs oneiric python32 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #622980 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622980 ** Also affects: znc (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622980 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790496 Title: FTBFS: znc depends on fix in swig 2.0.3 to work with Python 3.2 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790529] [NEW] Failing test on Perl 5.12, incorrectly trying to load Wx/Media.pm
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libwx-perl In Oneric, libwx-perl is FTBFS due to a failing test at the end of the package build (note that the package compiles fine, this is just a test script). The error message for the failing test is: Can't locate Wx/Media.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /build/buildd/libwx- perl-0.98/blib/lib /build/buildd/libwx-perl-0.98/blib/arch /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.12.3 /usr/local/share/perl/5.12.3 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.12 /usr/share/perl/5.12 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at (eval 19) line 1. This is an upstream bug in the Wx perl module, I am able to duplicate it by directly compiling the upstream tarball in an Oneiric chroot. (And can also confirm that the same tarball compiles just fine in Natty.) By adding some debug prints where the modules are loaded for that test (in Constant.xs), I've determined that the difference between the Natty and Oneiric builds isn't that Oneiric is failing to install Wx::Media, or installing it incorrectly. The difference is that Natty isn't trying to load it. The load of Wx::Media is conditional on these tests: #if wxPERL_USE_MEDIA wxUSE_MEDIACTRL WXPERL_W_VERSION_GE( 2, 6, 0 ) In Natty this evaluates as false, so Wx::Media is never loaded (and the test passes). In Oneiric, this evaluates as true. The first and third parts of the condition are true in both (wxPERL_USE_MEDIA is defined as '1', and both are using versions of wxwidgets higher than 2.6.0, 2.8.11.0-0ubuntu8 and 2.8.11.0-0ubuntu9). So, that leaves wxUSE_MEDIACTRL as the culprit. A recent change in the wxwidgets2.8 package on Oneiric enabled MediaCtrl where it was previously disabled: wxwidgets2.8 (2.8.11.0-0ubuntu9) oneiric; urgency=low * debian/rules: reenable mediactrl. This allows libwx_gtk2u_media-2.8 to be built, as this is required by some applications (LP: #632984) Further confirmation that this is the cause of the problem: redefining wxUSE_MEDIACTRL to '0' in cpp/setup.h allows libwx-perl to build and pass all tests. This is not an ideal solution (it spews warnings about the redefine), just a hack to prove the source of the problem. A better solution would be to turn MediaCtrl off by default again. ** Affects: libwx-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ftbfs oneiric perl-5.12-transition -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790529 Title: Failing test on Perl 5.12, incorrectly trying to load Wx/Media.pm -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790529] Re: Failing test on Perl 5.12, incorrectly trying to load Wx/Media.pm
Here's a relevant upstream thread. It appears that Wx::Media was built in Ubuntu 10.4, and disabled (intentionally or accidentally?) in 10.10: http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=881925 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790529 Title: Failing test on Perl 5.12, incorrectly trying to load Wx/Media.pm -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790465] [NEW] libogre-perl needs ogre package updated to 1.7.1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libogre-perl The libogre-perl package depends on liborge-dev in the ogre source package. Ogre is currently at version 1.6.4.dfsg1-1ubuntu1 on Oneiric, but libogre-perl depends on version 1.7.1 or higher. Debian sid currently has version 1.7.1-2 of ogre in sid, but the armel package has been held back at 1.6.4.dfsg1-1. The automatic merge of ogre 1.7.1-1 from Debian sid to the Ubuntu package failed, so it needs to be manually merged. I'm tagging this for the Perl 5.12 transition queue, recording the fact that the failures here are not related to the update in the version of perl. ** Affects: libogre-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: oneiric perl-5.12-transition -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790465 Title: libogre-perl needs ogre package updated to 1.7.1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 736084] Re: perl-gdb testcase fails, results in FTBFS
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #602668 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602668 ** Also affects: libdevel-bt-perl (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602668 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736084 Title: perl-gdb testcase fails, results in FTBFS -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 736084] Re: perl-gdb testcase fails, results in FTBFS
This failure also affects the powerpc architecture. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/71416852/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-powerpc .libdevel-bt-perl_0.05-1build1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736084 Title: perl-gdb testcase fails, results in FTBFS -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786250] [NEW] Remove dependency on perl-suid for Perl 5.12
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: backuppc The 5.12 release of Perl removes the suidperl binary, and therefore the perl_5.12.3-6ubuntu4 package no longer includes the perl-suid package. Oneiric will be migrating to Perl 5.12, and so all packages that depend on perl-suid must be updated to remove the dependency. The Perl 5 Porters (upstream core developers of Perl) recommend two alternative solutions to suidperl: sudo or a small C wrapper. BackupPC uses suidperl for a CGI script, which means it's not possible to substitute sudo. Fedora has applied a patch to use a C wrapper around the CGI script (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611009), and a similar patch has been submitted for Debian but not yet applied (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581950). I'll submit a branch of lp:ubuntu/backuppc applying this patch to the Ubuntu package. I'm requesting review of this solution by the Security Team, since it involves escalating privileges through a CGI script. ** Affects: backuppc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: backuppc (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: backuppc (Fedora) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: oneiric perl-5.12-transition ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #581950 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581950 ** Also affects: backuppc (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581950 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #611009 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611009 ** Also affects: backuppc (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611009 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786250 Title: Remove dependency on perl-suid for Perl 5.12 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 743615] Re: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Compiz)
I believe this is now Fix Released, since it went into Natty (and I can confirm that the application now works in Natty). I'll change the status, but change back if any concerns. ** Changed in: tcltk-defaults (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Fix Released ** Changed in: tcltk-defaults (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Invalid = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743615 Title: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Compiz) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786250] [NEW] Remove dependency on perl-suid for Perl 5.12
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: backuppc The 5.12 release of Perl removes the suidperl binary, and therefore the perl_5.12.3-6ubuntu4 package no longer includes the perl-suid package. Oneiric will be migrating to Perl 5.12, and so all packages that depend on perl-suid must be updated to remove the dependency. The Perl 5 Porters (upstream core developers of Perl) recommend two alternative solutions to suidperl: sudo or a small C wrapper. BackupPC uses suidperl for a CGI script, which means it's not possible to substitute sudo. Fedora has applied a patch to use a C wrapper around the CGI script (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611009), and a similar patch has been submitted for Debian but not yet applied (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581950). I'll submit a branch of lp:ubuntu/backuppc applying this patch to the Ubuntu package. I'm requesting review of this solution by the Security Team, since it involves escalating privileges through a CGI script. ** Affects: backuppc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: backuppc (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: backuppc (Fedora) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: oneiric perl-5.12-transition ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #581950 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581950 ** Also affects: backuppc (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581950 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #611009 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611009 ** Also affects: backuppc (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611009 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786250 Title: Remove dependency on perl-suid for Perl 5.12 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 771099] Re: claws-mail-extra-plugins version 3.7.8-1ubuntu1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
This FTBFS is also a blocker for the Perl 5.12 transition. It doesn't appear to be caused by the upgraded Perl version, but there's no way to be sure until the FTBFS is resolved. ** Tags added: perl-5.12-transition -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771099 Title: claws-mail-extra-plugins version 3.7.8-1ubuntu1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 771099] Re: claws-mail-extra-plugins version 3.7.8-1ubuntu1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
See also: http://orangesquash.org.uk/~laney/transitions/perl.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771099 Title: claws-mail-extra-plugins version 3.7.8-1ubuntu1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786327] [NEW] libcrypt-cbc-perl dependency failure in Perl 5.12 rebuild on armel and powerpc
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libcrypt-cbc-perl Several packages are FTBFS in the Perl 5.12 rebuild on the armel and powerpc architectures, with errors related to a dependency on libcrypt- cbc-perl like: ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), perl (= 5.6.0-12), libcrypt-cbc-perl Checking for already installed source dependencies... debhelper: missing perl: already installed (5.12.3-6ubuntu4 = 5.6.0-12 is satisfied) libcrypt-cbc-perl: missing Checking for source dependency conflicts... /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install debhelper libcrypt-cbc-perl Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libcrypt-cbc-perl : Depends: libcrypt-rijndael-perl but it is not going to be installed or libcrypt-blowfish-perl but it is not going to be installed or libcrypt-des-perl but it is not going to be installed or libcrypt-des-ede3-perl but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages apt-get failed. On amd64 and i386, the dependency is satisfied by installing libcrypt- rijndael-perl, but on armel and powerpc, it isn't finding that package. This is surprising, since libcrypt-rijndael-perl did successfully rebuild with Perl 5.12 on oneiric for armel and powerpc (see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcrypt-rijndael-perl). This is a blocker for the Oneiric migration to Perl 5.12, see http://orangesquash.org.uk/~laney/transitions/perl.html. ** Affects: libcrypt-cbc-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ftbfs oneiric perl-5.12-transition -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786327 Title: libcrypt-cbc-perl dependency failure in Perl 5.12 rebuild on armel and powerpc -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 786327] Re: libcrypt-cbc-perl dependency failure in Perl 5.12 rebuild on armel and powerpc
** Also affects: libcrypt-blowfish-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: libcrypt-des-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: libcrypt-twofish-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786327 Title: libcrypt-cbc-perl dependency failure in Perl 5.12 rebuild on armel and powerpc -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 779388] Re: Please merge kbd 1.15.2-3 (main) from Debian unstable
Also attaching debdiff of the debian/ directory between the current Ubuntu package kbd 1.15-1ubuntu5 and the new merge 1.15.2-3ubuntu1. ** Patch added: debdiff from current ubuntu (oneiric) version to new merge https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kbd/+bug/779388/+attachment/2124359/+files/kbd_1.15.2-3ubuntu1-UBUNTU.debdiff ** Changed in: kbd (Ubuntu) Assignee: Allison Randal (allison) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: kbd (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779388 Title: Please merge kbd 1.15.2-3 (main) from Debian unstable -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 779388] Re: Please merge kbd 1.15.2-3 (main) from Debian unstable
Attaching debdiff between the Debian package of kbd 1.15.2-3 and the merged Ubuntu package 1.15.2-3ubuntu1. ** Patch added: debdiff from current debian (unstable) version to merged ubuntu package https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kbd/+bug/779388/+attachment/2122605/+files/kbd_1.15.2-3ubuntu1.debdiff ** Changed in: kbd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: kbd (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779388 Title: Please merge kbd 1.15.2-3 (main) from Debian unstable -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 779388] [NEW] Please merge kbd 1.15.2-3 (main) from Debian unstable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kbd The kbd package needs a manual merge between 1.15-1ubuntu5 and 1.15.2-3. ** Affects: kbd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Allison Randal (allison) Status: New ** Changed in: kbd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Allison Randal (allison) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/779388 Title: Please merge kbd 1.15.2-3 (main) from Debian unstable -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 743615] Re: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic)
Curiously, if I run Gorilla remotely using SSH X11 forwarding, I get the same problem (flash to bare desktop, no window), but if I leave the application running for 2 minutes, suddenly the window appears, disappears, and then appears and stays visible (with a flash to bare desktop every time it appears or disappears). Will check on metacity... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743615 Title: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 743615] Re: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic)
Confirmed, the app works just fine under metacity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743615 Title: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 735601] Re: [STAGING] Eee PC 1015PEM unstable on 2.6.38-6-generic
I've been running with intel_idle.max_cstate=0 enabled for over a week now, with no recurrence of the earlier crashes, so I can recommend this as a workaround for anyone with similar problems. One odd side-effect: When I run the battery all the way down, where the laptop would usually either hibernate to save state or shut down completely, it now locks up with a black but backlit screen, and with the power light in a steady-on state (indicating that it's still running) instead of a steady-off state (indicating that it's powered down) or a flashing-on state (indicating that it's sleeping). There is no way to recover from the frozen black-screen-but-powered-on state, I have to power the machine down manually and restart. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735601 Title: [STAGING] Eee PC 1015PEM unstable on 2.6.38-6-generic -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 743615] Re: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty with Unity
Yes, the problem is with Compiz on both Unity and Classic. It's only metacity that avoids the problem. ** Summary changed: - Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty with Unity + Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743615 Title: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 743615] [NEW] Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic)
Public bug reported: I have a Tcl/Tk application that ran just fine on Maverick, Lucid, and before, and has been running just fine on Natty (Unity and Classic) until today. The application is not packaged for Ubuntu, but I'm concerned that if this simple Tcl/Tk application has problems on Natty then others will also. (And, I'm utterly dependent on this application for doing anything--it's my encrypted password database--which turns it into a critical blocker for me.) The change in Natty that caused the problem was made sometime between March 13th (when this netbook was last updated) and March 27th (when I fully updated it again). The application is Gorilla (https://github.com/zdia/gorilla), and I have reported the issue upstream at: https://github.com/zdia/gorilla/issues/37 To summarise, running the Gorilla application from GNOME Terminal command-line (on either Unity or Classic) results in: - The screen flashes to the desktop background (no windows, launcher, panel, indicators, or files that are usually on the desktop) - Then returns to the full desktop display - The command-line shows that Gorilla is running (does not return to terminal prompt), and 'ps auxww' shows that the application is running - But, no window is displayed for the application, in any workspace. Steps to repeat the issue: - Install the Ubuntu tcl8.5 package - Download the latest version of Gorilla at https://github.com/downloads/zdia/gorilla/gorilla1534.bin - Make gorilla1534.bin executable - Run ./gorilla1534.bin I suspected this might be a version-default/upgrade issue, as I noticed that /usr/bin/tclsh is currently aliased to /usr/bin/tclsh8.4 (through 3 layers of indirection) instead of /usr/bin/tclsh8.5. But, changing the /usr/bin/tclsh symlink to point at /usr/bin/tclsh8.5 has no effect (the screen still flashes to blank background then back to regular desktop display, and the application runs with no window displayed). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: tcl 8.4.16-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Mar 27 13:50:00 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: tcltk-defaults UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-26 (1 days ago) ** Affects: tcltk-defaults (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743615 Title: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 743615] Re: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic)
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743615 Title: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 743615] Re: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic)
This appears to be related to LP: #709461 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743615 Title: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 743615] Re: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic)
xwininfo attached. I should note that the first time I updated Ubuntu this morning, I was getting a Compiz crash everytime I tried to run Gorilla, in addition to all the behavior described above (it was reported right after the desktop display returned). The second time I updated today, the Compiz crash was no longer reported, but otherwise the failure was still the same. ** Attachment added: gorilla_xwininfo_output.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcltk-defaults/+bug/743615/+attachment/1946648/+files/gorilla_xwininfo_output.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743615 Title: Tcl/Tk application can't display window on Ubuntu Natty (Unity or Classic) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 709461] Re: Application windows can sometimes fail to display and will mask regions of the screen
I seem to have a consistently repeatable instance of this bug, see LP #743615 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709461 Title: Application windows can sometimes fail to display and will mask regions of the screen -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 737948] Re: make console colors use update-alternatives system
Dustin and I spent a couple hours talking about this yesterday. This is the best option we came up with as a short-term fix to make newt's color palette configurable, instead of hard-coded into a C function (to avoid forking the whole package when the patch to newt is only a few lines). Longer-term, we want to talk with the upstream newt developers about breaking the color palette out into a config file, how they'd like to do it, and what they'd be likely to accept upstream. But, it didn't seem fair to subject the Kubuntu folks to an aubergine command-line (or hold Ubuntu on the default palette) while that conversation is happening. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737948 Title: make console colors use update-alternatives system -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 737948] Re: make console colors use update-alternatives system
cjwatson wrote: the alternative target needs to reside in /etc, not /usr - otherwise the package effectively violates policy for /etc. Good idea. scottk wrote: I'd suggest defaulting to the default we had at feature freeze That's the intention, the default palette is the original one, and palette.ubuntu is the customized colors. (I expect that's what upstream will want too.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737948 Title: make console colors use update-alternatives system -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 735601] [NEW] [STAGING] Eee PC 1015PEM unstable on 2.6.38-6-generic
Public bug reported: I'm having trouble with random intermittent crashes on Natty (Classic Desktop), on an Asus Eee PC 1015PEM-PU17. I've attached a screenshot of the crash, apport didn't catch a crash report for it. It's a hard crash, have to reboot. No apparent connection to any user action (I can be typing in a terminal/text document, surfing web browser, whatever). There *might* be a connection to the Broadcom STA wireless driver, the crashes are apparently more frequent on a flaky conference network (but that's a purely subjective observation). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: linux-image-2.6.38-6-generic 2.6.38-6.34 Regression: Yes Reproducible: No ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-6.34-generic 2.6.38-rc7 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-6-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23. AplayDevices: List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC269VB Analog [ALC269VB Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC269VB Analog [ALC269VB Analog] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: allison1399 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf7cf8000 irq 45' Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC269VB' Components : 'HDA:10ec0269,1043841c,00100100' Controls : 11 Simple ctrls : 7 Date: Tue Mar 15 12:23:30 2011 Frequency: Once every few days. HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=8ff1ac9a-f413-48b5-93b1-653f2072890c InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) MachineType: ASUSTeK Computer INC. 1015PEM ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-6-generic root=UUID=ff2da031-f3b3-491d-ae6c-2387f3c31a6f ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.38-6-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-2.6.38-6-generic N/A linux-firmware1.48 SourcePackage: linux StagingDrivers: brcm80211 Title: [STAGING] UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-13 (1 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 10/06/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 0801 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: 1015PE dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: x.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 0x dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.chassis.version: x.x dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0801:bd10/06/2010:svnASUSTeKComputerINC.:pn1015PEM:pvrx.x:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rn1015PE:rvrx.xx:cvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:ct10:cvrx.x: dmi.product.name: 1015PEM dmi.product.version: x.x dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty needs-upstream-testing regression-release staging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735601 Title: [STAGING] Eee PC 1015PEM unstable on 2.6.38-6-generic -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 735601] Re: [STAGING] Eee PC 1015PEM unstable on 2.6.38-6-generic
** Attachment added: screenshot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735601/+attachment/1910344/+files/IMG_20110315_121221.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735601 Title: [STAGING] Eee PC 1015PEM unstable on 2.6.38-6-generic -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607752] Re: [needs-packaging] devmem2 needs packaging
devmem2 is packaged in universe for maverick and natty, is any further action needed here? ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607752 Title: [needs-packaging] devmem2 needs packaging -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697213] Re: calendar crash on natty : buffer overflow detected
The patches have been applied in Debian and re-released as 8.2.2. Kees says he will sync as soon as the new packages show up in requestsync. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697213 Title: calendar crash on natty : buffer overflow detected -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697213] Re: calendar crash on natty : buffer overflow detected
The Debian package patches the calendar source files to support Unicode in the form of wide characters (wchar_t) in place of traditional chars. In a few places, the patches don't completely replace the old char-like behavior, or too aggressively try to use wchar-like behavior on old- style char strings. The attached patch (to the Debian quilt patches) fixes the buffer overflow, which was caused by using 'sizeof' (which returns a count of bytes) to calculate the maximum size passed to 'swprintf' (which expects the size as a count of wide characters). The patch also fixes some related warnings from the compile, also caused by incorrect handling of wchars: io.c: In function ‘cal’: io.c:133:6: warning: format ‘%ls’ expects type ‘wchar_t *’, but argument 3 has type ‘char *’ io.c:216:10: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘swprintf’ from incompatible pointer type /usr/include/bits/wchar2.h:286:1: note: expected ‘wchar_t * __restrict__’ but argument is of type ‘wchar_t (*)[31]’ io.c:227:12: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘swprintf’ from incompatible pointer type /usr/include/bits/wchar2.h:286:1: note: expected ‘wchar_t * __restrict__’ but argument is of type ‘wchar_t **’ I'll send these patches upstream to Debian. ** Patch added: Fix wide character handling in Debian quilt patches https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bsdmainutils/+bug/697213/+attachment/1803322/+files/calendar_wchar_handling.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697213 Title: calendar crash on natty : buffer overflow detected -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697213] Re: calendar crash on natty : buffer overflow detected
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #610760 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610760 ** Also affects: bsdmainutils via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610760 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697213 Title: calendar crash on natty : buffer overflow detected -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 697213] Re: calendar crash on natty : buffer overflow detected
This is caused by the recent version update bsdmainutils of 8.2.1 (Bug #701597). Working on a fix. ** Changed in: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Allison Randal (allison) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697213 Title: calendar crash on natty : buffer overflow detected -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 701597] [NEW] Please sync bsdmainutils 8.2.1 (main) from Debian unstabl
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bsdmainutils The 8.2.1 Debian release fixes Ubuntu bug #604366 reported in July 2010. ** Affects: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701597 Title: Please sync bsdmainutils 8.2.1 (main) from Debian unstabl -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 525807] Re: [upstream] [3.2.1] OOo Slide Show and Fullscreen modes - not full screen under compiz
The OOo upstream bug ticket is: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=110881 And they have a verified fix merged into the 3.3 beta from this commit: http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO330/rev/d8dfa7f2ced6 It may be possible to do a backport of the fix to 3.2.1 (it's a pretty small patch). The upstream developer who made the fix (Philipp Lohmann from Oracle) is on vacation until Monday (Sept 20th). -- [upstream] [3.2.1] OOo Slide Show and Fullscreen modes - not full screen under compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 634686] [NEW] [FFE] sync Parrot version 2.6
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: parrot The Parrot 2.6 packages have been uploaded to Debian unstable: https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=parrot The packages made it into Debian in time for the FeatureFreeze, but after DebianImportFreeze. I didn't get the sync request in soon enough, so I'm requesting a FeatureFreeze Exception now. I've attached the NEWS diff since the previous stable release (2.3, which is currently in maverick). The 2.6 release of Parrot includes substantial speed improvements, as well as new feature additions to the compiler tool chain. These feature additions are necessary to build Rakudo (the first stable release of Perl 6). Currently, no other packages in the distribution (main, universe, or multiverse) depend on Parrot. I successfully built the packages for maverick in my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~allison/+archive/ppa/+packages Thanks, Allison ** Affects: parrot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [FFE] sync Parrot version 2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 634686] Re: [FFE] sync Parrot version 2.6
** Attachment added: NEWS changes since 2.3 release https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634686/+attachment/1564397/+files/parrot_2.6_NEWS.diff -- [FFE] sync Parrot version 2.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524203] Re: Feature Freeze exception for Parrot 2.0 sync
The Parrot 2.0 packages have now been uploaded to Debian unstable, ready for sync: https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=parrot -- Feature Freeze exception for Parrot 2.0 sync https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524203] [NEW] Feature Freeze exception for Parrot 2.0 sync
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: parrot Parrot 2.0 was released on January 19th, and I finished the Debian packaging for it on Feb 7th. I was hoping one of our Debian sponsors would be able to upload it in time to do a sync to Ubuntu before the FeatureFreeze, but they didn't have time (they're also Ubuntu devs, so I imagine they were busy preparing for the FeatureFreeze). I ran into Matthias Klose at the Python Language Summit today and he suggested submitting a freeze exception now so the packages can (hopefully) be synced as soon as they're uploaded into Debian unstable. Aside from substantial performance improvements and general feature enhancements, the biggest change in 2.0 from 1.4 (the previous stable release which went into Karmic and is currently in Lucid) is the addition of a new suite of compiler tools which will be needed in building packages for the Parrot implementations of Python, Perl, Ruby, etc. Getting the added parrot tools into Lucid will be especially important since it is an LTS release. Currently, no packages depend on the Parrot packages, so the impact should be minimal. The buildlogs for successful lucid builds are available for i386 and amd64 in my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~allison/+archive/ppa/+build/144 https://launchpad.net/~allison/+archive/ppa/+build/143 And the Debian source packages for Parrot 2.0 are available here: http://pub.lohutok.net/debian/ ** Affects: parrot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Feature Freeze exception for Parrot 2.0 sync https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524203] Re: Feature Freeze exception for Parrot 2.0 sync
** Attachment added: A diff of upstream change notices from 1.4 to 2.0 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39385488/parrot-news.diff -- Feature Freeze exception for Parrot 2.0 sync https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 404592] Re: Please sync parrot (1.4.0-1) from Debian unstable
** Summary changed: - Please merge parrot (1.4.0-1) from Debian unstable + Please sync parrot (1.4.0-1) from Debian unstable -- Please sync parrot (1.4.0-1) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 404592] Re: Please merge parrot (1.4.0-1) from Debian unstable
Mmm, yes, I was thinking of it as a merge because the previous version had Ubuntu changes. I've attached the debdiff from the Debian package to the Ubuntu package. ** Attachment added: parrot_1.4.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29536654/parrot_1.4.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- Please sync parrot (1.4.0-1) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 404592] Re: Please sync parrot (1.4.0-1) from Debian unstable
Source package name: parrot Source package version number to sync: 1.4.0-1 Where to sync from: Debian sid main Explicit confirmation that the Ubuntu changes should be overridden: Yes Changelog entries since current Ubuntu package: parrot (1.4.0-1ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low * Synchronize with Debian unstable. * Removes lpia patch, upstream fix included in new release. -- Allison Randal alli...@parrot.org Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:37:52 -0700 parrot (1.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release * debian/rules: - New upstream configuration option --disable-rpath allows packages to be built without rpath. * parrot-devel.install.in - Install pbc_to_exe binary and supporting library. -- Allison Randal alli...@parrot.org Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:54:07 -0700 -- Please sync parrot (1.4.0-1) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 404592] [NEW] Please merge parrot (1.4.0-1) from Debian unstable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: parrot Parrot 1.4.0 was released July 20, and the Debian packages were uploaded today (July 25). I've attached the diff.gz for the 1.4 packages for karmic, the original tarball is at ftp://ftp.parrot.org/pub/parrot/releases/stable/1.4.0/parrot-1.4.0.tar.gz. It would be valuable to get this release into karmic (though I know it's late in the cycle). The 1.4 packages: - remove the need for patches in the Ubuntu packaging, since the lpia fix was merged upstream - add the pbc_to_exe binary which is needed for building languages (I can't create parrot-python packages without it) - fix the FTBFS on the armel architecture I tested the packages in my PPA. Allison ** Affects: parrot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please merge parrot (1.4.0-1) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 404592] Re: Please merge parrot (1.4.0-1) from Debian unstable
** Attachment added: parrot_1.4.0-1ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29517959/parrot_1.4.0-1ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Please merge parrot (1.4.0-1) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404592 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219276] Re: Please merge parrot (1.0.0-1) from Debian unstable
Robert, thanks, that makes sense. So, I won't merge in Julien's changes and submit a new .diff.gz/debdiff. Julien, you can drop the - Remove Uploaders field. from your section of the changelog, since I had already removed it in my packages. (I don't think removing the Uploaders field gets a changelog entry anyway, just like you wouldn't put in a changelog entry for changing the Maintainter to MOTU.) And, your latest version of the changelog entry makes a lot of sense, especially if the final changelog entry will be tagged with the name of the uploader. With that one fix, I'm happy to have the packages submitted for review/upload. Thanks all! -- Please merge parrot (1.0.0-1) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219276] Re: Please merge parrot (1.0.0-1) from Debian unstable
This debdiff looks great, Julien, thanks! -- Please merge parrot (1.0.0-1) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219276] Re: Please merge parrot (1.0.0-1) from Debian unstable
Julien, thanks for the quilt patch, I'll merge that back upstream. You lost a chunk of the changelog showing stable Ubuntu packages produced over the last year+, which is unfortunate. Also, you readded Uploaders to the Ubuntu control file, which only makes sense in Debian. Otherwise, the debdiff looks good. Will it hurt my universe-contributors/MOTU application if you put your name on my packaging work? I'm still learning the process, maybe it's normal to remove the packager's name for sponsored uploads? But in Debian, my name stays on my packaging work, even for a sponsored upload. -- Please merge parrot (1.0.0-1) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219276] Re: Please sync parrot (1.0.0-1) from Debian unstable
Okay, I've got it. Apparently on karmic, lpia builds with -Os by default (thanks to Robert Collins for digging up that tip). Among other things, -Os disables the -falign-functions optimization (in order to save space). Parrot can build with or without aligned function pointers, but it was detecting lpia as ordinary i386, and so expecting them, and failing on an assert. I added a config patch to detect the lpia architecture (using the -gnulp element of the arch-os-gnu triplet) and correctly set Parrot's config value for aligned_funcptr to 0. Parrot now successfully builds on karmic lpia. -- Please sync parrot (1.0.0-1) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219276] Re: Please sync parrot (1.0.0-1) from Debian unstable
Great. I've attached the .diff.gz for the 1.0 packages. I integrated the older Ubuntu packaging modifications back into the Debian packages, so the only differences now are the changelog (which incorporates the full Debian and Ubuntu packaging history), the control file (which lists MOTU as the maintainer), and the patch I just added for the lpia architecture (with a simple patching strategy, since the patch has already been merged upstream). The original tarball can be pulled from ftp://ftp.parrot.org/pub/parrot/releases/stable/1.0.0/parrot-1.0.0.tar.gz, or from Debian. Requesting sponsorship. Should I subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors to this ticket, or create a new one? ** Attachment added: parrot_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.diff.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27250770/parrot_1.0.0-1ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Please sync parrot (1.0.0-1) from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
