[Bug 1900429] Re: [snap] Unable to access files owned by another user

2020-10-20 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
In my case, a docker-based firmware build process produces a update
package (owned by root, for some reason), which I upload to a target via
a web-interface.

Sure, I can change the owner of the files but still, this used to work
and it doesn't now.

Let me turn the question around. What is the use-case for prohibiting
access to files in the user's home directory, which are readable by the
user based on good old Unix filesystem permissions? Devising a
completely parallel access policy based on arbitrary and invisible rules
seems utterly stupid to me.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900429

Title:
  [snap] Unable to access files owned by another user

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1900429/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1900429] [NEW] [snap] Unable to access files owned by another user

2020-10-19 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
Public bug reported:

The chromium snap cannot access files in my $HOME that have a different
owner, even though the files are world-readable.

** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900429

Title:
  [snap] Unable to access files owned by another user

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1900429/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1746955] [NEW] gcc-avr installs libcc1 in /usr/lib, causing package conflicts

2018-02-02 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
Public bug reported:

gcc-avr packages for artful and bionic includes the files
/usr/lib/libcc1.* which probably isn't correct (I suspect they should be
in the target specific path, if anywhere) and may conflict with other
gcc packages. It specifically conflicts with the "GNU Arm Embedded
Toolchain" PPA package, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-arm-
embedded/+bug/1745143 .

Packages for <= zesty do not include these files at all.

** Affects: gcc-avr (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1746955

Title:
  gcc-avr installs libcc1 in /usr/lib, causing package conflicts

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-avr/+bug/1746955/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1688920] Re: INFO: task systemd-udevd:326 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2017-12-06 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
This consistently happens when I use usb-creator. I've tried the lubuntu
17.10 image and the ubuntu 17.10 image, on several USB sticks. Usb-
creator finally reports success, but the resulting USB stick FAILS
verification (both in the installer and manually by comparing md5sums).

** Also affects: usb-creator (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1688920

Title:
  INFO: task systemd-udevd:326 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1688920/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1688920] Re: INFO: task systemd-udevd:326 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2017-11-27 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
By the way, this was on an up to date 17.10, kernel 4.13.0-17-generic.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1688920

Title:
  INFO: task systemd-udevd:326 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1688920/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1688920] Re: INFO: task systemd-udevd:326 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2017-11-27 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
I got the same dmesg output when using Startup Disk Creator to write an
(L)ubuntu ISO image to a USB stick. After a very long time, and three
such messages in the log, the disk creator finally claimed that it was
complete. I'm not confident that the installation medium is actually OK,
will try it shortly.

Details of the USB stick I used:
[12274.016048] usb 3-1.4: new high-speed USB device number 10 using xhci_hcd
[12274.142013] usb 3-1.4: New USB device found, idVendor=0951, idProduct=1665
[12274.142018] usb 3-1.4: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, 
SerialNumber=3
[12274.142021] usb 3-1.4: Product: DataTraveler 2.0
[12274.142024] usb 3-1.4: Manufacturer: Kingston
[12274.142027] usb 3-1.4: SerialNumber: 50E549C20210BE8059BC09A9
[12274.167999] usb-storage 3-1.4:1.0: USB Mass Storage device detected
[12274.168534] scsi host3: usb-storage 3-1.4:1.0
[12275.275617] scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 PMAP 
PQ: 0 ANSI: 6
[12275.276767] sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 0
[12276.083697] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] 15335424 512-byte logical blocks: (7.85 
GB/7.31 GiB)
[12276.084529] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[12276.084547] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 23 00 00 00
[12276.085363] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] No Caching mode page found
[12276.085386] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
[12276.127850]  sda: sda1
[12276.131198] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI removable disk

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1688920

Title:
  INFO: task systemd-udevd:326 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1688920/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1726124] Re: DNS domain search paths not updated when VPN started

2017-11-16 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
BTW, the long timeout you see on short name lookup failures is most
likely due to LLMNR being on by default. I think this is insane and I
always switch it off in /etc/systemd/resolved.conf .

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726124

Title:
  DNS domain search paths not updated when VPN started

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1726124/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1726124] Re: DNS domain search paths not updated when VPN started

2017-11-16 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
Paul Smith, what you describe is information leakage and shouldn't IMHO
work as you say by default.

Consider that I'm connected to a corporate network and have an
(untrusted) VPN active which I only want to use to access resources on
its network (never-default: yes). Then by having the resolver adding the
domain of the VPN network to short name lookups could leak those local
names to the remote VPN (depending on the order the lookups are
performed in) and potentially allow the untrusted network to take over
internal services that are accessed using short names. This could happen
by mistake also (such as setting "mail" as your smtp server if the
remote network uses the same name).

I don't think the order of the lookups can be controlled to prevent
this, for example what should determine the order when you have to VPN
active?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726124

Title:
  DNS domain search paths not updated when VPN started

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1726124/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1726124] Re: DNS domain search paths not updated when VPN started

2017-11-16 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
to->two

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726124

Title:
  DNS domain search paths not updated when VPN started

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1726124/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1722759] [NEW] Package missing gemspec file

2017-10-11 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
Public bug reported:

The gemspec file is missing from the package, causing packages that
depend on ruby-underscore-rails to fail on install (notably "gitlab").

Manually adding the file from 
https://github.com/rweng/underscore-rails/blob/v1.8.2/underscore-rails.gemspec
 as 
/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/specifications/underscore-rails-1.8.2.gemspec
 (with the files hardcoded instead of using git ls-files), the package gitlab 
installs successfully.

** Affects: gitlab (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: ruby-underscore-rails (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: gitlab (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1722759

Title:
  Package missing gemspec file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gitlab/+bug/1722759/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1694331] Re: "internal error" popup on login

2017-05-30 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
Christopher, I have since upgraded that Dell Precision to 17.04 and
while I still often get the error popup on that computer I cannot
confirm that it is actually Xorg that crashed, because now that I
looked, the crash popup on 17.04 today was about some unrelated software
(unity-settings-something) so I can't really be sure if I have ever seen
Xorg crash on 17.04. It used to be Xorg when the Dell computer had
16.10, though.

The UX32VD that still runs 16.10 continues to show the Xorg crash from
time to time (but not nearly at every boot).

Also I checked with my co-workers and those (2) who run 16.10 all
regularly see an error popup but none can verify that it's still
actually about Xorg (it happens frequently enough that no-one bothers to
look anymore). A co-worker who's still on 16.04 says he hasn't seen the
error.

So in summary I can only definitely say that 16.10 shows that Xorg crash
and that it has happened on more or less every computer I or my co-
workers have used with 16.10.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694331

Title:
  "internal error" popup on login

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1694331/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1426596] Re: I get an "error report" popup on log-in

2017-05-29 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
Reported as Bug 1694331.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1426596

Title:
  I get an "error report" popup on log-in

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1426596/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1694331] [NEW] "internal error" popup on login

2017-05-29 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
Public bug reported:

Sometimes (not very often), Ubuntu shows an error popup immediately
after login (after power-on) that says Xorg has crashed. No other ill
effects have been noticed, everything works normally after that.

The automatic error reporting does not go through because of
"UnreportableReason: Invalid core dump: BFD: Warning
/tmp/apport_core_5n7s8i3d is truncated: expected core file size >=
40902656, found: 21037056."

I was asked by Christopher M. Penalver in Bug 1426596 to submit a new
bug using "ubuntu-bug xorg" when the error appeared. This is that
report, although the computer I used now to generate the report is not
the same as I mentioned in the original bug (I've seen the same issue on
more or less all computers I've used and IIRC from at least 16.04 to
17.04).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-53.56-generic 4.8.17
Uname: Linux 4.8.0-53-generic x86_64
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
 
ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8.3
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: 
[core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,vpswitch,snap,mousepoll,resize,place,move,wall,grid,regex,imgpng,session,gnomecompat,animation,fade,unitymtgrabhandles,workarounds,scale,expo,ezoom,unityshell]
CompositorRunning: compiz
CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Mon May 29 22:31:18 2017
DistUpgraded: 2017-04-15 01:32:04,429 DEBUG /openCache(), new cache size 85680
DistroCodename: yakkety
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
 bbswitch, 0.8, 4.8.0-52-generic, x86_64: installed
 bbswitch, 0.8, 4.8.0-53-generic, x86_64: installed
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [8086:0166] (rev 
09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller 
[1043:1507]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-18 (1137 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 (20140417)
MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. UX32VD
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/@/boot/vmlinuz-4.8.0-53-generic.efi.signed 
root=UUID=959fa127-2d15-48a5-9fa0-70f918fab2ad ro rootflags=subvol=@ quiet 
splash pcie_aspm=force nmi_watchdog=0 vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to yakkety on 2017-04-14 (44 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 01/29/2013
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: UX32VD.214
dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567
dmi.board.name: UX32VD
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: 1.0
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrUX32VD.214:bd01/29/2013:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnUX32VD:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnUX32VD:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:ct10:cvr1.0:
dmi.product.name: UX32VD
dmi.product.version: 1.0
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.13.0+16.10.20160818.2-0ubuntu2
version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.70-1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 12.0.6-0ubuntu0.16.10.1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 12.0.6-0ubuntu0.16.10.1
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.18.4-1ubuntu6.1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.10.2-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.7.1-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20160706-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.12-2
xserver.bootTime: Mon May 29 22:28:30 2017
xserver.configfile: default
xserver.errors:
 
xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
xserver.version: 2:1.18.4-1ubuntu6.1
xserver.video_driver: modeset

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 ubuntu yakkety

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694331

Title:
  "internal error" popup on login

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1694331/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1426596] Re: I get an "error report" popup on log-in

2017-04-03 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
This still happens from time to time on a fresh install of 16.10 on a
Dell Precision 5520. So x86_64. Apport says it's unreportable because
the core file is truncated.

** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1426596

Title:
  I get an "error report" popup on log-in

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1426596/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1568368] Re: Misleading ellipsis in "Restart now..."

2016-11-10 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
I'm pretty sure that at some point in previous releases, the normal
system Shut down dialog has been shown after clicking "Reboot now..." so
I could choose to shut down instead of reboot. Usually, I defer
rebooting until I anyway want to shut down, so "Shut down" is the normal
choice for me.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568368

Title:
  Misleading ellipsis in "Restart now..."

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1568368/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1640717] [NEW] Software Updater input events go to the wrong control

2016-11-10 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
Public bug reported:

When Software Updater starts, the "Details of updates" section only
covers half the window's height, even though the "Technical description"
section is collapsed. Refer to attached image #1.

If I expand then collapse "Technical description", the "Details of
updates section" restores to normal look, as in attached image #2.
However, the lower part of the section (below the selected row in image)
is not functional and does not respond to click, scroll or any other
mouse activity.

Input events instead go to the hidden "Technical description" section,
for example you can change from its "Description" tab to its "Changes"
tab by clicking on the checkbox two rows down from the selected one in
the "Details of updates" section. Also the mouse pointer changes to a
text pointer in the area that would have been covered by the text box if
the "Technical description" section had been expanded (as in image #3).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
Package: update-manager 1:16.10.7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-26.28-generic 4.8.0
Uname: Linux 4.8.0-26-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Thu Nov 10 08:22:32 2016
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/update-manager
GsettingsChanges:
 b'com.ubuntu.update-manager' b'show-details' b'true'
 b'com.ubuntu.update-manager' b'window-height' b'593'
 b'com.ubuntu.update-manager' b'first-run' b'false'
 b'com.ubuntu.update-manager' b'window-width' b'484'
 b'com.ubuntu.update-manager' b'launch-time' b'1478762256'
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-03-24 (596 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.10 "Utopic Unicorn" - Release amd64 (20141022.1)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.5
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: update-manager
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to yakkety on 2016-11-02 (7 days ago)

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug yakkety

** Attachment added: "software-updater-bug.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640717/+attachment/4775213/+files/software-updater-bug.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640717

Title:
  Software Updater input events go to the wrong control

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1640717/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1382661] Re: Support for JLINK in 0.8.0 requires small patch

2014-10-18 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
The fix is most definitely in the SF repo:

http://sourceforge.net/p/openocd/code/ci/96549bf0121a7cff08885ddca22ab7a1c362ea24/


You may want to check that you're using the correct URL, SF changed it a few 
years back and unfortunately the old one is still available but frozen. The 
correct one is:

http://git.code.sf.net/p/openocd/code


By the way, the patch only helps in the odd case where libusb-1.0 is 
unavailable so libusb-0.1 is used instead. This is not a recommended 
configuration, since adapter drivers that only work with libusb-1.0 API will 
not be built.

I recommend to install libusb-1.0-0-dev before the configure step, then
the patch won't be needed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1382661

Title:
  Support for JLINK in 0.8.0 requires small patch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openocd/+bug/1382661/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 986983] Re: Opening Empthay from the Indicator also opens the Preference window

2013-04-10 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
Why was this marked invalid? It's an obvious bug which can be reproduced
like in comment #8.

In short, after running empathy -p once, the preference windows opens
every time the empathy windows is raised by executing empathy, even
without the -p.

Interestingly, even when starting using the option
-h,  --start-hidden Don't display the contact list or any other dialogs 
on startup
the preferences dialog still pops up.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986983

Title:
  Opening Empthay from the Indicator also opens the Preference window

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/986983/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 429510] Re: package dahdi 1:2.2.0-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-03-28 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
Just a thought... Is DAHDI really required for asterisk? I was about to
install asterisk in a linux container, but since it depends on dahdi it
had to pull in all sorts of linux kernel packages which are nonsensical
and probably would fail inside a container.

If it's not required, maybe dahdi should be be moved from depends to
recommends in asterisk? That would likely solve the reporter's problem.

-- 
package dahdi 1:2.2.0-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429510
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 397750] Re: mouse : input : event field not found

2010-02-21 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
I'm having the same problem here, with current karmic. My logs have
gotten cluttered like this for ages, but it's not until now I realised
what's causing these messages.

I have a Logitech MX500 mouse, with buttons above and below the scroll
wheel to scroll up/down just by holding one of these buttons. Every time
I push it, every time I release it, and a load of times when I move the
mouse while pressing it, one of these lines gets logged. Seriously
annoying, especially when scrolling in the System Log Viewer :P

-- 
mouse : input : event field not found
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 354136] Re: unintuitive back and forward

2009-04-13 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #578837
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578837

** Also affects: fileroller via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578837
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
unintuitive back and forward
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 354136] [NEW] unintuitive back and forward

2009-04-02 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: file-roller

The back and forward buttons don't work the way they do in other
applications (web browsers, nautilus,...).

Consider an archive with the following directory structure:

/
/a
/a/b
/a/c

After browsing from / to /a to /a/b, you press Back and get to /a.
Browse to /a/c and press Back to /a. One would expect that pressing Back
again would get you to the directory from which you first got to /a,
which is /. Instead you end up in /a/b.

The attached patch corrects the behavior to match nautilus, which
deletes all forward history when you browse to a new location.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/file-roller
Package: file-roller 2.24.1-0ubuntu2
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: file-roller
Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic i686

** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug

-- 
unintuitive back and forward
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 354136] Re: unintuitive back and forward

2009-04-02 Thread Andreas Fritiofson

** Attachment added: file-roller-2.24.1_history-fix.diff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24711317/file-roller-2.24.1_history-fix.diff

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24711318/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24711319/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24711320/ProcStatus.txt

-- 
unintuitive back and forward
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 354136] Re: unintuitive back and forward

2009-04-02 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
Oops, maybe should free the element data as well.


** Attachment added: file-roller-2.24.1_history-fix2.diff
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24728371/file-roller-2.24.1_history-fix2.diff

-- 
unintuitive back and forward
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 61361] Re: Machine won't boot because fstype misidentifies ext3 filesystem as minix

2006-10-13 Thread Andreas Fritiofson
I still have this problem in Dapper with klibc-utils 1.1.16-1ubuntu5

-- 
Machine won't boot because fstype misidentifies ext3 filesystem as minix
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61361

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs