[Bug 1173073] Re: Broken sounds in Skype
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1219407 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219407
Did you install Skype from the Ubuntu repository ("partners"?), or from
the Skype website?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173073
Title:
Broken sounds in Skype
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1173073/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173073] Re: Broken sounds in Skype
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1219407 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219407 IIUC, it was fixed by adding the environment variable workaround to the .desktop file. If you start Skype from the dash/menu all should be well. If you start it from the command line then you're on your own. This is not ideal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173073 Title: Broken sounds in Skype To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1173073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1173073] Re: Broken sounds in Skype
On 12/10/13 18:45, Alexandros Frantzis wrote: > Note that this workaround was added to the .desktop file in the ubuntu > skype package, which means it's only applied if you start skype through > a GUI that uses desktop files. The workaround (PULSE_LATENCY_MSEC=50) > needs to be manually applied in other cases, e.g., if running skype from > the command line. Apparently that includes starting Skype via the Startup Applications tool. :( I've not noticed the sound problem recently, however. Andrew -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173073 Title: Broken sounds in Skype To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1173073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1203888] Re: appindicator doesn't work in Saucy
I've been using "xfce4-panel". You can have it float, or dock it to the side of the screen. It also does other stuff (task switcher, etc), but I just removed all that and put the indicator area widget on it. As long as you start it after Unity it works fine. (The last one to start takes control of the notification area.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203888 Title: appindicator doesn't work in Saucy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glipper/+bug/1203888/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 852458] Re: three snapshots created
I came here to report the nested snapshot problem also. It means the affected snapshots must be deleted manually. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852458 Title: three snapshots created To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-btrfs-snapshot/+bug/852458/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 997909] Re: apt-btrfs-snapshot creates snapshots that cannot be deleted
The problem appear to be caused by multiple snapshots taken within the same second. See #852458. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997909 Title: apt-btrfs-snapshot creates snapshots that cannot be deleted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-btrfs-snapshot/+bug/997909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1217828] [NEW] apt-btrfs-snapshot crashes without any arguments
Public bug reported: The failure looks like this: $ sudo apt-btrfs-snapshot Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/apt-btrfs-snapshot", line 98, in if args.command == "supported": AttributeError: 'Namespace' object has no attribute 'command' Adding a command or --help works fine, but this isn't what you'd call "graceful failure". ** Affects: apt-btrfs-snapshot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217828 Title: apt-btrfs-snapshot crashes without any arguments To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-btrfs-snapshot/+bug/1217828/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173073] Re: Broken sounds in Skype
dpkg -l skype | cat Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-=-==-- ii skype 4.2.0.11-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 amd64client for Skype VOIP and instant messaging service -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173073 Title: Broken sounds in Skype To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1173073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173073] Re: Broken sounds in Skype
That's the version I have. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173073 Title: Broken sounds in Skype To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1173073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173073] Re: Broken sounds in Skype
I can confirm that the environment variable does the job though. Thanks for the info. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173073 Title: Broken sounds in Skype To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1173073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1203888] Re: appindicator doesn't work in Saucy
klipper doesn't work either, although the terminal give no error messages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203888 Title: appindicator doesn't work in Saucy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glipper/+bug/1203888/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173073] Re: Broken sounds in Skype
I'm seeing Skype sound problems in saucy. The notification sounds sometimes work (without sounding quite right), but often just cause a continuous buzz that doesn't go away until I kill Skype. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173073 Title: Broken sounds in Skype To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1173073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1204069] Re: lxc dhcp fails
Ironically, this was the first thing I thought of when I encountered the problem, but of course I couldn't update without net connectivity. I then didn't think of it again when I found the work-around. I can confirm that the problem is now solved. Thanks for your help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1204069 Title: lxc dhcp fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1204069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1204069] [NEW] lxc dhcp fails
Public bug reported: With the latest Saucy, LXC containers don't seem to have their network setting configured correctly. I've tried this with both containers created before I upgraded to Saucy, and containers freshly created after the upgrade. In both cases, the guest user-space is 12.04. After the container has started I try to find the address, but it fails: $ host precise 10.0.3.1 Using domain server: Name: 10.0.3.1 Address: 10.0.3.1#53 Aliases: Host precise not found: 2(SERVFAIL) Looking in the syslog reveals that it did try to obtain an address, and dnsmasq did try to serve one (I think). The following is repeated many times: Jul 23 12:07:27 GBN-ASTUBBS-UB dnsmasq-dhcp[1475]: DHCPDISCOVER(lxcbr0) 00:16:3e:9e:0f:ee Jul 23 12:07:27 GBN-ASTUBBS-UB dnsmasq-dhcp[1475]: DHCPOFFER(lxcbr0) 10.0.3.154 00:16:3e:9e:0f:ee But, still, nothing can get in, and nothing can get out. Inside the container, ifconfig gives this: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:3e:89:48:ab inet6 addr: fe80::216:3eff:fe89:48ab/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:192 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:28 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:23650 (23.6 KB) TX bytes:6952 (6.9 KB) loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:65536 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) If I try running "sudo dhclient" manually then I get many more entries in the log, but still no address. I can get the network interface to function by configuring it manually: ifconfig eth0 10.0.3.50/24 route add default gw 10.0.3.1 echo 'nameserver 10.0.3.1' > /run/resolvconf/interface/eth0 service resolvconf restart I'm sure that the official way to set up a static IP would work too, but really I want DHCP to work, like it used to. ** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1204069 Title: lxc dhcp fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1204069/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1202204] [NEW] nm-openconnect has no equivalent to openconnect --no-xmlpost
Public bug reported: I need --no-xmlpost to connect to my VPN, via the command line. The GUI has no equivalent option so authentication fails every time. The GUI used to work, in 12.04, with the old openconnect implementation, but it seems to have got left behind. ** Affects: network-manager-openconnect (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202204 Title: nm-openconnect has no equivalent to openconnect --no-xmlpost To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-openconnect/+bug/1202204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1067686] [NEW] Multiple monitor support REGRESSION
Public bug reported: For the last year or two, I have been using Ubuntu in a triple-head setup: 1 laptop screen, plus two DVI monitors. This hasn't always been glitch free, but my recent experiences have been fairly smooth*. I'm using an ATI card with the 'radeon' driver (lshw reports "Whistler XT [AMD Radeon HD 6700M Series]"). Yesterday, the login screen appeared on only two of the three screens, and Unity appeared to hang whilst starting up, again only showing on two screens. After some fiddling I determined that the blank screen's DVI cable has to be physically unplugged for Unity to start correctly. Some fiddling further showed that using a VGA cable for the blank screen allows it to boot to desktop, but I still only get two screens. However, I can now choose which two I want. I suspect that this was related to the update I did the day before. I have attached a screenshot of my update history. Footnote: * It was still the case that the "displays" dialog sometimes failed to bring up all three screens correctly, but, once set, the triple display setup worked very reliably at log-in. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "problem update history" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1067686/+attachment/3401268/+files/Screenshot%20from%202012-10-17%2011%3A39%3A36.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1067686 Title: Multiple monitor support REGRESSION To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1067686/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689887] Re: armel ICE gcc 4.5
Related: lp:gcc-linaro/4.6,revno=106819 ** Also affects: gcc-linaro-tracking Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Milestone: None => 4.7.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689887 Title: armel ICE gcc 4.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/689887/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 838994] Re: ICE building perl w/ -marm
This is a backport from upstream: Related: lp:gcc-linaro/4.6,revno=106806 ** Also affects: gcc-linaro-tracking Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Milestone: None => 4.7.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838994 Title: ICE building perl w/ -marm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/838994/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 778256] Re: Notification area ("system tray") missing when using dual monitors of different sizes, with their bottoms aligned
I see the same problem. I'm running 3.8.16-0ubuntu1~natty1. If I adjust
my layout such that the smaller screen is at the top edge, rather than
the bottom, then I see the icons fine.
Annoyingly the system tray is also always on the left screen, even
though I set my centre monitor to be my primary (xrandr --output
DisplayPort-2 --primary). The unity launcher DTRT, but the system tray
does not.
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: unity
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778256
Title:
Notification area ("system tray") missing when using dual monitors of
different sizes, with their bottoms aligned
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/778256/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 710652] Re: ARM neon vld1q_lane_u8 & co. don't accept lanes >= 8
** Tags added: 46merge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710652 Title: ARM neon vld1q_lane_u8 & co. don't accept lanes >= 8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/710652/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 730440] Re: armel: incorrect immediate for movt
** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Milestone: 4.7.0 => 4.6.0 ** Tags added: 46merge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730440 Title: armel: incorrect immediate for movt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/730440/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 731665] Re: internal compiler error compiling kernel on powerpc
** Tags added: 46merge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731665 Title: internal compiler error compiling kernel on powerpc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/731665/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 788573] [NEW] Skype won't start
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: skype Skype started fine when I logged on this morning, but then it crashed mid-chat-conversation, and now it won't start again. I'm not sure if the crash is important - it does that, but perhaps the reason it won't start is related to an update? I have security updates install silently in the background, so I'm not sure. Installing all outstanding updates and rebooting does not clear to problem. I'm running 11.04. When I try to run skype from the command line I get this output: $ skype /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/menuproxies/libappmenu.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 (:4151): Gtk-WARNING **: Failed to load type module: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/menuproxies/libappmenu.so /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/menuproxies/libappmenu.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 (:4151): Gtk-WARNING **: Failed to load type module: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/menuproxies/libappmenu.so (:4151): Gtk-WARNING **: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-ibus.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 (:4151): Gtk-WARNING **: Loading IM context type 'ibus' failed (:4151): Gtk-WARNING **: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im- ibus.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 (:4151): Gtk-WARNING **: Loading IM context type 'ibus' failed /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/menuproxies/libappmenu.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 (:4151): Gtk-WARNING **: Failed to load type module: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/menuproxies/libappmenu.so /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/menuproxies/libappmenu.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 (:4151): Gtk-WARNING **: Failed to load type module: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/menuproxies/libappmenu.so (:4151): Gtk-WARNING **: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-ibus.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 (:4151): Gtk-WARNING **: Loading IM context type 'ibus' failed zsh: abort skype ** Affects: skype (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788573 Title: Skype won't start -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780551] Re: incorrect interface in avxintrin.h
> Concrete ideas: > __GNUC_DISTRIBUTOR__: "Ubuntu" > __GNUC_DISTRIBUTOR_VERSION__: "1104" > __GNUC_DISTRIBUTOR_PATCHLEVEL__: "8" I should say, I don't like this idea, but I am not a GCC maintainer. If you want to take this idea to g...@gcc.gnu.org, or better still send a patch to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org, and the maintainers approve it, then I will be happy to backport it to all Linaro GCC compilers. (And you can ask Matthias nicely if he will set the values.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780551 Title: incorrect interface in avxintrin.h -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 780551] Re: incorrect interface in avxintrin.h
On 25/05/11 17:26, Matthias Kretz wrote: > Yeah, well. It's something I have never really understood about distributions. > Upstream can be as throrough as they want in doing only bug-fixes in their > patchlevel releases. Still there's this rule that the version number in > released distributions may not change, even if it's all bug-fixes. So > distribution users have to wait for the next distribution version for a fix > (and new bugs: because often the minor or major version changed in the > meantime) or use unsupported packages/compile from sources. I think it's stricter than that. There must be no changes whatsoever unless they fix a specific reported bug (and then it has to be important). Andrew -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780551 Title: incorrect interface in avxintrin.h -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 780551] Re: incorrect interface in avxintrin.h
On 25/05/11 13:43, Matthias Kretz wrote: > I agree that it is much nicer to be able to use feature tests/macros > instead of compiler-version ifdefs. But library headers really don't > have any other way to work around compiler bugs or use new compiler > features. One can not expect from library users that they will correctly > define all required feature macros. I meant that the header files that declare the functions should define the macros. They don't, and there's not much we can do about it. > Regarding the development of distri compiler specifc code: I don't > believe the macro would get much use other than the __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ > macro gets. Are you afraid of developers trying to cripple a distri they > don't like? Can you come up with a scenario where a developer would make > use of a distri specific define resulting in breakage on other distris? > I find this very hard to imagine. (Yes, there are developers that do > lots of stupid things, but the only thing to keep them from breaking > stuff is to have them stop programming. ;-) ) Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence! I forgot who said (something like) that, but it's certainly true in programming. I know I've done things the lazy way, or misunderstood how to use things enough times myself, so I'm not going to trust others to be perfect. > I understood you don't want to change the gcc 4.5.2 package at all? I'd > be happy for any, whatsoever small update to Natty gcc-4.5 that makes it > possible to work around the bug. So if you were to add the > _MM_MASKSTORE_PS_NEEDS_NATTY_WORKAROUND define that would be a welcome > help. I don't care much for how bad the ifdefs become. I can put that > logic in an extra code section which defines my feature macros... The code is frozen for anything but bug fixes, and even those have to be serious ones, I think. Adding a macro to a header is probably OK (Matthias?), but updating to 4.5.3 is out of the question. > But I'd hate for these things to only be fixable after a lengthy > discussion on a bugtracker, which is why I'd really like to have a macro > do determine the differences from the vanilla GCC release. These kind of > incompatibilities happened before and will happen again. I could add some sort of identifier to Linaro GCC, and Ubuntu GCC would pick that up. But, so would half a dozen other distros (mostly embedded, I think). Each then add their own patches on top of that, potentially. These patches will fix bugs, add features, add bugs, and change random things to taste. Does the Linaro identifier now mean anything? No, no more so than the GNU macros are working for you now. Sorry, but for these reasons and the reasons I gave before, I really don't like the idea. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780551 Title: incorrect interface in avxintrin.h -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780551] Re: incorrect interface in avxintrin.h
I'm very nervous about adding anything that allows you to tell which distro/vendor/whatever a compiler came from. Yes, there are applications where a careful user could use that information, but the problem is that other people would use that macro incorrectly, and before you know it you have entire packages that are silently depending on these things. Then one day, Ubuntu ceases to use Linaro compilers, and suddenly dozens of packages stop building for no known reason, and all their dependencies also fail to build/install, and it's the compiler team that gets the blame. And, of course, you also gets sources that won't build on other distros, etc. The correct way to handle this is to add a macro per-feature that tells you what form to use. Unfortunately, this really has to be done at the time of the interface changes, or else you still have versions you don't know what to do with. I think that in this case, given that natty gcc is frozen and won't get upgraded to 4.5.3, we should add a small patch which defines a macro _MM_MASKSTORE_PS_NEEDS_NATTY_WORKAROUND. This will only ever exist in natty gcc, and therefore very few people will ever know it exists, and even fewer will have any interest in using it, so nothing will break later. You code would then be: __m128 m, x; float *mem; #if !defined(_MM_MASKSTORE_PS_NEEDS_NATTY_WORKAROUND) && defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ == 4 && (__GNUC_MINOR__ < 5 || (__GNUC_MINOR__ == 5 && __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ <= 2)) _mm_maskstore_ps(mem, m, x); #else _mm_maskstore_ps(mem, _mm_castps_si128(m), x); #endif You'd have to carry this slight nonsense in your source for while, but it won't do any harm even if you kept it forever. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780551 Title: incorrect interface in avxintrin.h -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 787422] Re: package python-papyon 0.5.5-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: cannot access archive: No such file or directory
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787422 Title: package python-papyon 0.5.5-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: cannot access archive: No such file or directory -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 787422] [NEW] package python-papyon 0.5.5-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: cannot access archive: No such file or directory
Public bug reported: No further info ... a box just popped up on my screen. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: python-papyon 0.5.5-1ubuntu1.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon May 23 09:43:22 2011 ErrorMessage: cannot access archive: No such file or directory InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: papyon Title: package python-papyon 0.5.5-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: cannot access archive: No such file or directory UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-02 (21 days ago) ** Affects: papyon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787422 Title: package python-papyon 0.5.5-1ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: cannot access archive: No such file or directory -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675347] Re: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure
The patch was committed here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~linaro-toolchain-dev/gcc- linaro/4.6/revision/106731 Does you compiler not have that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675347 Title: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675347] Re: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure
I can't reproduce the problem with the original testcase. Is this a new problem? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675347 Title: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675347] Re: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure
The fix was committed to Linaro GCC yesterday. Related: lp:gcc-linaro/4.5,revno=99493 ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Milestone: None => 4.5-2011.04-0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675347 Title: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 629671] Re: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands in thumb-1 mode
** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629671 Title: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands in thumb-1 mode -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 693502] Re: gromacs ns.c miscompiled on armel with -O1 -fcse-follow-jumps -finline-small-functions
** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693502 Title: gromacs ns.c miscompiled on armel with -O1 -fcse-follow-jumps -finline-small-functions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 721021] Re: GCC ICE on arm/xscale
** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721021 Title: GCC ICE on arm/xscale -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675347] Re: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure
Oops, bad syntax ... Related: lp:gcc-linaro/4.6,revno=106731 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675347 Title: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675347] Re: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure
The 4.6 version is ok though: Related: gcc-linaro/4.6,revno=106731 ** Also affects: gcc-linaro-tracking Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Milestone: None => 4.7.0 ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Stubbs (ams-codesourcery) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675347 Title: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675347] Re: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure
My backport of this patch appears to cause some test regressions caused by a compiler segmentation fault. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675347 Title: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 731665] Re: internal compiler error compiling kernel on powerpc
Bernd has now posted this upstream: http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg01345.html ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731665 Title: internal compiler error compiling kernel on powerpc -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675347] Re: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure
Julian has now committed the patch upstream: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01477.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675347 Title: volatile int causes inline assembly build failure -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 701733] Re: Re-merge patch and fixes (was: x86_64 gcc build failure with 2011.01-0)
These patches were re-merged in lp:gcc-linaro/4.5,revno=99475, and released in 4.5-2011.03-0. ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Milestone: None => 4.5-2011.03-0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/701733 Title: Re-merge patch and fixes (was: x86_64 gcc build failure with 2011.01-0) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 731665] Re: internal compiler error compiling kernel on powerpc
I've tested and committed the suggested patch. Related: lp:gcc-linaro/4.5,revno=99487 ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Stubbs (ams-codesourcery) ** Also affects: gcc-linaro-tracking Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Milestone: None => 4.7.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731665 Title: internal compiler error compiling kernel on powerpc -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 730440] Re: armel: incorrect immediate for movt
Assigning Ramana to submit this upstream (or set it to "Invalid" if that's not appropriate). Related: lp:gcc-linaro/4.5,revno=99489 ** Also affects: gcc-linaro-tracking Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Milestone: None => 4.7.0 ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Assignee: (unassigned) => Ramana Radhakrishnan (ramana) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730440 Title: armel: incorrect immediate for movt -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 730440] Re: armel: incorrect immediate for movt
I've just merged Ramana's patch into lp:gcc-linaro/4.5 ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Milestone: None => 4.5-2011.04-0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730440 Title: armel: incorrect immediate for movt -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 730440] Re: armel: incorrect immediate for movt
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730440 Title: armel: incorrect immediate for movt -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 730860] Re: [regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_adjust_cfa, at dwarf2out.c:1861
This patch comes from Bernd Schmidt, but has not been tested yet. ** Patch added: "Proposed patch for GCC" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.5/+bug/730860/+attachment/1893563/+files/more-epilogues.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730860 Title: [regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_adjust_cfa, at dwarf2out.c:1861 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705689] Re: Qt applications crash with segfault error on armel when Qt is built with gcc 4.5 on natty
The patch needs to be pushed upstream. Related: lp:gcc-linaro/4.5,revno=99483 ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Milestone: None => 4.7.0 ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Assignee: (unassigned) => Richard Sandiford (rsandifo) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705689 Title: Qt applications crash with segfault error on armel when Qt is built with gcc 4.5 on natty -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705689] Re: Qt applications crash with segfault error on armel when Qt is built with gcc 4.5 on natty
Richard's patch has now been committed to Linaro GCC 4.5. ** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.5 Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.5 Milestone: None => 4.5-2011.03-0 ** Also affects: gcc-linaro-tracking Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705689 Title: Qt applications crash with segfault error on armel when Qt is built with gcc 4.5 on natty -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500524] Re: bootstrap failure in stage3 (integer overflow in preprocessor expression)
** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500524 Title: bootstrap failure in stage3 (integer overflow in preprocessor expression) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604874] Re: firefox fails to build from source with Linaro toolchain
** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604874 Title: firefox fails to build from source with Linaro toolchain -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 629671] Re: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands in thumb-1 mode
** Tags added: 46merge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629671 Title: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands in thumb-1 mode -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 721531] Re: [armel] gcc computes wrong address for main() at build time
@Steve: if you want GDB to give the true function address use '*main' - 'main' will give the first address after the prologue (at least when setting breakpoints, it does). @Michael: I think casting pointers from one pointer type to another (type punning) is deeply dodgy due to strict-aliasing rules, but I don't think converting them to integers is a problem (provided they are the same width). The bug here appears to be that GCC assumes that function pointer are always aligned, but fails to realise that thumb function pointers are always aligned+1, so to speak. I don't think it will be too hard to fix it. (Of course, fixing GCC so it's consistent probably won't help mono - that'll still need a fix. In my experience, this concept of off-by-one pointers breaks many, many things in 'interesting' ways.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/721531 Title: [armel] gcc computes wrong address for main() at build time -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 629671] Re: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands in thumb-1 mode
Oh, apparently this is a backport that didn't get labelled in the changelog. Marking as upstream. ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Milestone: 4.7.0 => 4.6.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629671 Title: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands in thumb-1 mode -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 629671] Re: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands in thumb-1 mode
Adding tracking for upstream submission ... Related: lp:gcc-linaro/4.5,revno=99433 ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Milestone: None => 4.7.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629671 Title: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands in thumb-1 mode -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 629671] Re: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands in thumb-1 mode
** Also affects: gcc-linaro-tracking Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629671 Title: ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands in thumb-1 mode -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 686381] Re: C++ link failure on ARM
I can reproduce the failure under a Natty chroot. The missing symbol, "__exidx_end", is defined by the linker script (see /usr/lib/ldscripts/armelf_linux_eabi.x), so I can't see why it isn't defined, but that's just a symptom of the real problem. For whatever reason, this package is setup to link libstdc++ statically, not dynamically, and this means manually specifying all the hidden libraries, but they have been done incorrectly. If the command is truncated before the "-nodefaultlibs" option, thus allowing the compile driver to do a normal link, it does not use libgcc_eh at all, but uses libgcc_s.so instead, and the link is successful. The following link line works correctly with this compiler: g++ -Wall -Wunused -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wno-unknown-pragmas -Wshadow -g -O2 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -o luatex luatex-luatex.o -Wl ,--export-dynamic libluatex.a libff.a libluamisc.a libluasocket.a liblua51.a /home/ams/lp686381/luatex-0.60.2/build/libs/zziplib/libzzip.a -lpng -lz -lpoppler /home/ams/lp686381/luatex-0.60.2/build/libs/obsdcompat/libopenbsd- compat.a libmd5.a libmplib.a lib/lib.a /home/ams/lp686381/luatex-0.60.2/build/texk/kpathsea/.libs/libkpathsea.a -ldl -lm -nodefaultlibs -Wl,-Bstatic -lstdc++ -Wl,-Bdynamic -lm -lgcc_s -lgcc -lc -lgcc_s -lgcc ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686381 Title: C++ link failure on ARM -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 659713] Re: armel build failures 20101012
This new problem is PR46667. There's a patch linked from there that fixes the problem. I'm not sure why it hasn't been applied yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659713 Title: armel build failures 20101012 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 674146] Re: dpkg segfaults during debootstrap on natty armel
@ James Hunt Trying to reproduce -O1 or -O2 by listing a set of optimization flags is invalid. a) most optimization flags are no-ops at the default -O0 (optimization disabled); b) There are some optimizations that are enabled at a given optimization level, but do not have a named flag. However, it is valid to say "-O2 -fno-whatever" to see if a specific optimization pass is at fault (although disabling an earlier one can hide a bug in a later one, so you can't make any firm statements). -- dpkg segfaults during debootstrap on natty armel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674146 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 595479] Re: Sequel to PR40521 -- -g causes GCC to generate .eh_frame
This was fixed in GCC 4.4 right from the beginning in the initial CodeSourcery mega-patch. ** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.4 Status: New => Fix Released -- Sequel to PR40521 -- -g causes GCC to generate .eh_frame https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 595479] Re: Sequel to PR40521 -- -g causes GCC to generate .eh_frame
The problem is fixed upstream (GCC 4.6) with a different patch. The problem is fixed in Linaro GCC 4.5 with Thomas' rejected patch (and was released in September). This doesn't fix it in the most general way, but is not wrong, so I'm going to leave it as is. The patch is here: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~linaro-toolchain-dev/gcc- linaro/4.5/revision/99352 ** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.5 Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.4 Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Stubbs (ams-codesourcery) -- Sequel to PR40521 -- -g causes GCC to generate .eh_frame https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 595479] Re: Sequel to PR40521 -- -g causes GCC to generate .eh_frame
** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.5 Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Stubbs (ams-codesourcery) -- Sequel to PR40521 -- -g causes GCC to generate .eh_frame https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 590696] Re: [PR43847] fix wrong use of objdump during cross build
Matthias, I'm assigning the upstream submission of this patch to you. ** Also affects: gcc-linaro-tracking Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Milestone: None => 4.6.0 ** Changed in: gcc-linaro-tracking Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko) -- [PR43847] fix wrong use of objdump during cross build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 590696] Re: [PR43847] fix wrong use of objdump during cross build
Patch backported. ** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.5 Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- [PR43847] fix wrong use of objdump during cross build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 590696] Re: [PR43847] fix wrong use of objdump during cross build
** Changed in: gcc-linaro/4.5 Assignee: (unassigned) => Andrew Stubbs (ams-codesourcery) -- [PR43847] fix wrong use of objdump during cross build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/590696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500524] Re: bootstrap failure in stage3 (integer overflow in preprocessor expression)
Related: lp:gcc-linaro/4.4,revno=93551 -- bootstrap failure in stage3 (integer overflow in preprocessor expression) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500524 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 398403] Re: [PR40735] gcc-4.4 fails to build upstart 0.6 on armel due to an internal compiler error
I've just built upstart_0.6.6-1ubuntu1.dsc on an IGEPv2 board. The build appears to succeed and run as far as testing, but the tests fail: FAIL: test_job_class FAIL: test_job FAIL: test_control === 3 of 13 tests failed Please report to upstart-de...@lists.ubuntu.com === make[4]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/ams/lp398403/upstart-0.6.6/init' make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ams/lp398403/upstart-0.6.6/init' make[2]: *** [check] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ams/lp398403/upstart-0.6.6/init' make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ams/lp398403/upstart-0.6.6' dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2 make: *** [build] Error 29 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 -- [PR40735] gcc-4.4 fails to build upstart 0.6 on armel due to an internal compiler error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500524] Re: bootstrap failure in stage3 (integer overflow in preprocessor expression)
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Assignee: (unassigned) => Ulrich Weigand (uweigand) -- bootstrap failure in stage3 (integer overflow in preprocessor expression) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500524 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 608143] Re: [armel] libjava testsuite failures
To be investigated. Has it been fixed upstream? Is binutils responsible/contributary? Low priority as no real problems and it may be a big fix. ** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided => Low -- [armel] libjava testsuite failures https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608143 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607635] Re: regressions in linaro test build 4.4.4-7ubuntu1~ppa2 compared to 4.4.4-6ubuntu2
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided => High -- regressions in linaro test build 4.4.4-7ubuntu1~ppa2 compared to 4.4.4-6ubuntu2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607635 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 607635] Re: regressions in linaro test build 4.4.4-7ubuntu1~ppa2 compared to 4.4.4-6ubuntu2
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New -- regressions in linaro test build 4.4.4-7ubuntu1~ppa2 compared to 4.4.4-6ubuntu2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607635 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604753] Re: process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)
It's critical that we investigate this and understand it. ** Changed in: linaro-toolchain-wg Assignee: Linaro Toolchain Developers (linaro-toolchain-dev) => (unassigned) -- process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604753] Re: process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)
** Changed in: linaro-toolchain-wg Assignee: (unassigned) => Linaro Toolchain Developers (linaro-toolchain-dev) -- process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604753] Re: process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb)
** Also affects: linaro-toolchain-wg Importance: Undecided Status: New -- process shared mutex's fail on armel v7 (thumb) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604753 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604653] Re: sequel to PR40521
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided => Medium -- sequel to PR40521 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604653 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 598147] Re: libstdc++ test failures
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided => Medium -- libstdc++ test failures https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598147 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 598462] Re: [PR38292] corrupted profile info with -O[23] -fprofile-use
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided => Low -- [PR38292] corrupted profile info with -O[23] -fprofile-use https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598462 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517081] Re: Floating-point assembly and disassembly bugs on armel
** Also affects: binutils-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: binutils-linaro Importance: Undecided => Low -- Floating-point assembly and disassembly bugs on armel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517156] Re: [armel, fixed in 4.5] ICE in find_reloads, at reload.c in thumb mode
This may be fixed by Paul's patch that's due to go into gcc-linaro any time now. ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided => High -- [armel, fixed in 4.5] ICE in find_reloads, at reload.c in thumb mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 517156] Re: [armel, fixed in 4.5] ICE in find_reloads, at reload.c in thumb mode
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [armel, fixed in 4.5] ICE in find_reloads, at reload.c in thumb mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 505829] Re: [PR42748, armel] excess errors in libstdc++ testsuite when built with glibc-2.11
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [PR42748, armel] excess errors in libstdc++ testsuite when built with glibc-2.11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/505829 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 505829] Re: [PR42748, armel] excess errors in libstdc++ testsuite when built with glibc-2.11
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided => Medium -- [PR42748, armel] excess errors in libstdc++ testsuite when built with glibc-2.11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/505829 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 503448] Re: [arm] building non-PIC libraries fails under ARMv7 mode
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided => High ** Project changed: gcc-linaro => binutils-linaro -- [arm] building non-PIC libraries fails under ARMv7 mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503448 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 605042] Re: [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4
** Also affects: linaro-toolchain-wg Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linaro-toolchain-wg Assignee: (unassigned) => Linaro Toolchain Developers (linaro-toolchain-dev) -- [armel] java fails to start with eglibc-2.12-0ubuntu4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 512959] Re: causes crashes on armel with -Wl,-O1
High priority for investigation. Possibly change importance once understood. ** Also affects: binutils-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: binutils-linaro Importance: Undecided => High -- causes crashes on armel with -Wl,-O1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512959 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 506358] Re: [armel] unable to find a register to spill in class 'GENERAL_REGS'
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: High => Low -- [armel] unable to find a register to spill in class 'GENERAL_REGS' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 497295] Re: [armel] additional testsuite failures with -mthumb (compared to -marm)
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided => High -- [armel] additional testsuite failures with -mthumb (compared to -marm) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 398403] Re: [PR40735] gcc-4.4 fails to build upstart 0.6 on armel due to an internal compiler error
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided => Medium -- [PR40735] gcc-4.4 fails to build upstart 0.6 on armel due to an internal compiler error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398403 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600209] Re: getfem++ fails to build from source in linaro
** Tags added: x86 -- getfem++ fails to build from source in linaro https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600209 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600207] Re: liblauncher fails to build from source in linaro
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New -- liblauncher fails to build from source in linaro https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600209] Re: getfem++ fails to build from source in linaro
** Also affects: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New -- getfem++ fails to build from source in linaro https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600209 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
