Re: [Bug 1392978] Re: ksh93 off by one
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:57:09PM -, Jens Elkner wrote:
> ---schnipp---
> #!/bin/ksh93
>
> typeset -r SCRIPT=/tmp/bla
>
> function doMain {
> typeset SCRIPT=/tmp/foo
> print "SCRIPT=${SCRIPT}"
> }
>
> doMain
> print "WTF $?"
> ---schnapp---
>
> SCRIPT is within doMain() a local scope var. Since this is obviously
> wrong and ksh stops processing at this point, it is a severe issue,
> breaks a lot of scripts (at least in my case).
Could you try this with 1.0.1 or later, preferably 1.0.8. Hopefully it
should resolve your issues.
Anuradha
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1392978
Title:
ksh93 off by one
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/1392978/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1887863] Re: ksh2020 has massive memory issues
Great, I will tag you on future communication on the exec format issue. Hopefully we'll get to a resolution. Thanks for your time on reporting the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887863 Title: ksh2020 has massive memory issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/1887863/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1888017] [NEW] Removal of ksh93 package from Groovy Gorilla
Public bug reported: Request the removal of the ksh93 package from Ubuntu as it has been made redundant with the rollback of the ksh package from ksh2020 back to ksh93. Release to remove from: Groovy Gorilla What to remove: Source and all binary packages of ksh93 No reverse dependencies ksh93 package has already been removed in Debian. This is bring the ksh package back to sync with Ubuntu as the primary package for ksh93 related fixes and updates. ** Affects: ksh93 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888017 Title: Removal of ksh93 package from Groovy Gorilla To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh93/+bug/1888017/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1887863] Re: ksh2020 has massive memory issues
I believe the issue you're referring to is similar to this issue that was filed recently regarding the "Exec format error": https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965072 Will bring it up with the folks working on ksh93 to see if there's a resolution that can be found. Let me know if there's a github id that I can tag you on for any updates related to it. Since you're on focal, you can use the 'ksh93' package, which is basically ksh93u+ that was spun off as a result of the transition to ksh2020 on the 'ksh' package. Recently, we have reverted ksh2020 back to ksh93 and removed the "ksh93" package in Debian. So please track the following package in Ubuntu for updates as this is back to ksh93 and should address your original issue on this bug report. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #965072 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965072 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887863 Title: ksh2020 has massive memory issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/1887863/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1887863] Re: ksh2020 has massive memory issues
Chris, thanks for the report and Valgrind observations. We have reverted ksh2020 back to ksh93u+, in Debian and Ubuntu with the latest version 2020.0.0+really93u+20120801-8 as of this writing available for Groovy Gorilla when you install the "ksh" package. Could you pick up this version and let us know if you continue to run into problems? Happy to help resolve and/or bring them to the attention of folks who may be able to help you move forward. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887863 Title: ksh2020 has massive memory issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/1887863/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534855] Re: ksh crashes if .paths is a directory
** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534855 Title: ksh crashes if .paths is a directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/1534855/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534855] Re: ksh crashes if .paths is a directory
** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534855 Title: ksh crashes if .paths is a directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/1534855/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 672836] Re: process substitution can't be redirected
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu, but cannot reproduce it. This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still exist in the latest version of Ubuntu, please comment on why that is the case and change the bug status to NEW. ** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672836 Title: process substitution can't be redirected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/672836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574880] Re: Discipline function "get" results mangled
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu, but cannot reproduce it. This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still exist in the latest version of Ubuntu, please comment on why that is the case and change the bug status to NEW. ** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574880 Title: Discipline function "get" results mangled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/574880/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 638867] Re: ksh93 crashed with SIGSEGV
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu, but cannot reproduce it. This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still exist in the latest version of Ubuntu, please comment on why that is the case and change the bug status to NEW. ** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638867 Title: ksh93 crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/638867/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520591] Re: ksh uses the wrong PID for $$ when on the last line of a script
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu, but cannot reproduce it. This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still exist in the latest version of Ubuntu, please comment on why that is the case and change the bug status to NEW. ** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520591 Title: ksh uses the wrong PID for $$ when on the last line of a script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/520591/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1086873] Re: SIGSEGV upon entering '#' at beginning of line at prompt
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu, but cannot reproduce it. This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still exist in the latest version of Ubuntu, please comment on why that is the case and change the bug status to NEW. ** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086873 Title: SIGSEGV upon entering '#' at beginning of line at prompt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/1086873/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1534855] Re: ksh crashes if .paths is a directory
** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534855 Title: ksh crashes if .paths is a directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/1534855/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1785087] Re: bad dependency in ksh package
Sorry it took so long, but this should be addressed in the latest update (2020.0.0+really93u+20120801-7), binfmt-support is now a suggested dependency. ** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785087 Title: bad dependency in ksh package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/1785087/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1693975] Re: ksh: remove binfmt-support dependency
Sorry it took so long, but this should be addressed in the latest update (2020.0.0+really93u+20120801-7), binfmt-support is now a suggested dependency. ** Changed in: ksh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693975 Title: ksh: remove binfmt-support dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ksh/+bug/1693975/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 393364] Re: copyfs asks for fuse-module even when fuse is compiled in the kernel
** Changed in: copyfs (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: copyfs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Anuradha Weeraman (aweeraman) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393364 Title: copyfs asks for fuse-module even when fuse is compiled in the kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/copyfs/+bug/393364/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1701028] Re: Jacksum -h option missing source help_en.txt
** Changed in: jacksum (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: jacksum (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Anuradha Weeraman (aweeraman) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701028 Title: Jacksum -h option missing source help_en.txt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jacksum/+bug/1701028/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
