[Bug 880734] Re: gnome-terminal window changes size to one-line in KDE
This is probably the same as https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649680 You can work around this problem in KDE by going to System Settings - Window Behavior - Window Rules. Add a new rule called Gnome-terminal workaround which sets Obey geometry restrictions to Force No. See the screenshots here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/32163197/screenshots/kde-gnome-terminal-workaround.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/32163197/screenshots/kde-gnome-terminal-workaround2.png ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #649680 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649680 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880734 Title: gnome-terminal window changes size to one-line in KDE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/880734/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 975227] Re: Gnome-Terminal Launched in KDE Is Resized to Small Window
This is probably the same as https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649680 You can work around this problem by going to System Settings - Window Behavior - Window Rules. Add a new rule called Gnome-terminal workaround which sets Obey geometry restrictions to Force No. See the screenshots here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/32163197/screenshots/kde-gnome-terminal-workaround.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/32163197/screenshots/kde-gnome-terminal-workaround2.png ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #649680 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649680 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975227 Title: Gnome-Terminal Launched in KDE Is Resized to Small Window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/975227/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694910] Re: Regression: patch to bug 539477 breaks Super+P keybindings
I ran into this problem and came up with a workaround using xsession and xbindkeys, see http://blog.n01se.net/?p=314 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694910 Title: Regression: patch to bug 539477 breaks Super+P keybindings -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 537133] Re: mountall issues with NFS root filesystem
Steve, Scott, Thanks for looking at this bug and changing the portmap dep chain. However this only fixes one of the problems mentioned in this report, and NFS root clients are still broken. The mountall patch I provided above is still necessary (and I'm not sure that's even the end of the story). It's pretty trivial to install a VM then convert it to a NFS root VM for testing. Would you mind doing that so you can see the problems for yourselves? I've already spent more energy than I budgeted tracking down the bugs described in this report. No offense intended, but if Ubuntu maintainers don't care about NFS roots, then I'm probably better off to switch to a different distribution at this point. Thanks, Aron -- mountall issues with NFS root filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537133 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 419501] Re: apport-kde assert failure: python: ../../src/xcb_io.c:242: process_responses: Assertion `(((long) (dpy-last_request_read) - (long) (dpy-request)) = 0)' failed.
unsubscribe -- apport-kde assert failure: python: ../../src/xcb_io.c:242: process_responses: Assertion `(((long) (dpy-last_request_read) - (long) (dpy-request)) = 0)' failed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419501 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 485709] Re: /etc/init/mountall.conf fails when root is mounted using NFS instead of NBD
I don't use LTSP but I've found two major problems using nfsroots on Lucid, and probably Karmic as well: 1. By default NFS wants locking, which creates a circular dependency: rootfs - statd - portmap - local-filesystems event - rootfs - statd - etc. 2. To work around that problem, you can put nolock in /etc/fstab for the rootfs. However this runs into a bug in mountall where it doesn't notice the rootfs has been successfully mounted, so it will loop forever trying to finish mounting the local filesystems. These two problems are described in more detail in bug #537133 with a patch that fixes the second issue. -- /etc/init/mountall.conf fails when root is mounted using NFS instead of NBD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 518806] Re: Evince resets zoom if you navigate through pdf
unsubscribe -- Evince resets zoom if you navigate through pdf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 418509] Re: [Karmic] Hangs during shutdown with kernel 2.6.31-7
bug 418560 unsubscribe bug 418573 unsubscribe bug 419056 unsubscribe bug 419297 unsubscribe bug 419378 unsubscribe bug 419385 unsubscribe bug 419393 unsubscribe bug 419402 unsubscribe bug 419664 unsubscribe bug 419670 unsubscribe bug 419680 unsubscribe bug 419753 unsubscribe bug 419846 unsubscribe bug 419859 unsubscribe bug 419985 unsubscribe bug 420017 unsubscribe bug 420137 unsubscribe bug 420175 unsubscribe bug 420284 unsubscribe bug 420477 unsubscribe bug 420630 unsubscribe bug 421063 unsubscribe bug 421065 unsubscribe -- [Karmic] Hangs during shutdown with kernel 2.6.31-7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 418509] Re: [Karmic] Hangs during shutdown with kernel 2.6.31-7
Sorry mf, that was my goof. :-( I'm subscribed to one or more of the dups because of this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/malone/+bug/475775 As a result I was getting mail on this bug. So I read https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface but I made a mistake. Now I've done it right, but not before I accidentally put that spam here. Sorry about that. -- [Karmic] Hangs during shutdown with kernel 2.6.31-7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 537133] [NEW] mountall issues with nfsroots
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall I think I've found two bugs in mountall-2.7 related to nfsroots. This report describes both, since working around one exposes the other. The first bug is a dependency issue, circular and otherwise. Unless the nfsroot is mounted with nolock, NFS locking depends on rpc.statd, which depends on portmap, which depends on the local-filesystems event (in /etc/init/portmap.conf). mountall will never provide this event because it treats the rootfs as local even if it's networked, for the sake of daemons that need to wait for the rootfs to be remounted rw. The problem is that portmap.conf needs access to /etc (ro), /var/run (rw) and /lib/init/rw (rw). A dependency on local-filesystems essentially means / and /tmp. Changing the dependency to virtual- filesystems would be more correct, but I'm not entirely certain that remounting / should depend on any general *-filesystems events. It gets messier in statd.conf, which doesn't call out any filesystem dependencies, yet requires portmap to be running. It tries to directly start portmap which fails because the mentioned filesystems aren't writable yet. Portmap and statd will start successfully later, but not in time to satisfy the rootfs dependency. The second bug is when one tries to work around the above problems by specifying nolock in /etc/fstab for the nfsroot. In this case we land in mountall.c at the bottom of run_mount() where the is_remote() test causes spawn() to be called with wait=FALSE. spawn() then calls nih_child_add_watch() which is supposed to eventually call back to spawn_child_handler(), but it appears to fail to connect: spawn: mount -n -a -t nfs -o remount,nolock 16.1.1.2:/export/romano / spawn: mount / [272] spawn: calling nih_child_add_watch for / init: job_process_handler: Ignored event 1 (0) for process 272 The third line is debugging I added. If spawn_child_handler() had been called, we would have seen an additional line: mount / [272] exited normally I didn't dig into libnih to figure out why this isn't working. Rather I changed the test on which wait=FALSE depends, since it seems like mountall should be waiting for the rootfs. This works, see attached patch, though it only fixes the non-ideal nolock case. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Mar 11 01:18:06 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: mountall 2.7 ProcEnviron: LC_COLLATE=C PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-15.22-generic SourcePackage: mountall Uname: Linux 2.6.32-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: mountall (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid patch -- mountall issues with nfsroots https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537133 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 537133] Re: mountall issues with nfsroots
** Patch added: mountall.c.is_root.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40758849/mountall.c.is_root.patch ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40758647/Dependencies.txt -- mountall issues with nfsroots https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537133 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 537135] Re: mountall calls mount -a for every mount
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40759011/Dependencies.txt -- mountall calls mount -a for every mount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 537135] [NEW] mountall calls mount -a for every mount
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall For example: spawn: mount -n -a -t nfs -o remount,nolock 16.1.1.2:/export/romano / I suspect that -a is a mistake. It's line 1702 in mountall.c from version 2.7 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Mar 11 01:31:28 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: mountall 2.7 ProcEnviron: LC_COLLATE=C PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-15.22-generic SourcePackage: mountall Uname: Linux 2.6.32-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: mountall (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- mountall calls mount -a for every mount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 537136] Re: try_mounts vs newly_mounted
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40759135/Dependencies.txt -- try_mounts vs newly_mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 537136] [NEW] try_mounts vs newly_mounted
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mountall While reading mountall.c, I noticed what seems to be a minor issue. The while-loop in try_mounts() depends on newly_mounted=TRUE, but its initial value is FALSE until mark_mounted() manages to find something. While that will probably always be the case, it might be better for newly_mounted to be initialized to TRUE so try_mounts() is guaranteed to run on the first call. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Mar 11 01:35:14 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: mountall 2.7 ProcEnviron: LC_COLLATE=C PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-15.22-generic SourcePackage: mountall Uname: Linux 2.6.32-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: mountall (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- try_mounts vs newly_mounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490732] Re: KVM guests no longer start after upgrading host system from 9.04 to 9.10 (i386 only)
This is not a development issue, it's a support issue. You have a memory corruption bug (or something similar) in 32-bit kvm on Karmic, which is supported until April 2011. This bug should be marked confirmed, severity upgraded, and taken seriously. -- KVM guests no longer start after upgrading host system from 9.04 to 9.10 (i386 only) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 490732] Re: KVM guests no longer start after upgrading host system from 9.04 to 9.10 (i386 only)
This is not a development issue, it's a support issue. You have a memory corruption bug (or something similar) in 32-bit kvm on Karmic, which is supported until April 2011. This bug should be marked confirmed, severity upgraded, and taken seriously. -- KVM guests no longer start after upgrading host system from 9.04 to 9.10 (i386 only) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
