[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04
FYI, I think the patch made it to 4.4 stable as well -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04
Can we build the latest 4.8, may be we should wait for 4.8-rc7. I've got all the fixes upstream, with the latest being 135e8c9250dd5c8c9aae5984fde6f230d0cbfeaf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04
Can we please get answers to 1, 2 and 4 for comment #128. Also Kalpana has a request for a new kernel build. Thanks, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04
Thank you for the excellent summary. Questions 1. Can we get the configurations of the machines. 2. The first column is the number of times the test ran? 3. I see that 4.4.0-31-generic-50-Ubuntu passed on all machines across several runs, is that true? 4. Did any of the tests result in system hang? Can we find out from the summary? Would it be fair to assume that tests when run against 4.4.0-31-generic-50-Ubuntu would pass again and we should work off of that? My interest is in 4.4.0-34-generic-53~lp1573062PATCHED, With that I notice that gulpin saw failures in mmapfork and probably a hang there -- for which I posted a scheduler try_to_wake_up fix upstream. Generally binacle faces brk stress test failures -- it will be interesting to see its machine configuration and why the test failed One observation at my end is that we should reboot between runs as I think some tests can kill important tasks in the system and I am not sure if there is a guarantee that the system is able to carry on correct operation recovering from all the tasks being re-spawned after OOM for example. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04
I just posted another patch @ http://www.mail-archive.com/linux- ker...@vger.kernel.org/msg1219903.html, I am testing this patch at the moment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04
Thanks Jeff. I see that the ARM64 might have failed - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1610320 Can we know the git commit id that fixed the ARM64 failure in mainline? BTW, could you please share the full machine configurations - threads+RAM+swap for each of the other architectures you ran this on? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for Power architecture for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1610320] Re: stress-ng memory testing causes Arm64 system to hang
Do we know what change fixed the issue? commit id? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1610320 Title: stress-ng memory testing causes Arm64 system to hang To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1610320/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04
These logs are something I've not seen here in my testing. This shows that we are stuck doing an up_write() on root->rwsem in the anon_vma path. It looks like we are contending on the rwsem's sem->wait_lock. I don't have a reproduction of this issue, it will be interesting to examine what is causing the heavy contention -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04
I am unable to reproduce the failure either, but your system with 32G and 128 threads seems like the test would start 128 hogs each hogging up 32GB. How much swap do you have on them? Could you post the dmesg to see what failed and the logs around it? It looks like the stack stressor failed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04
Can I quickly check if the oom_reaper patches are there in the built kernel or is it just the fix I posted? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04
Had several other runs of success. I would like to see runs from others as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04
At my end, I ran two runs with success. More runs in progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04
I just looked at the directory and I can find just the arm64 kernel. Could you please confirm if I am looking at the right thing and at the right place? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04
Sorry the 14.04 should be 16.04 in comment #61 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1573062] Re: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04
I have 14.04 installed with 4.4.0-28 and I can see the following In the bad case 1. OOM'ing of stress-ng-brk is slow, I can see it making progress -- see tasks being scheduled/console output and sysrq output on Ctrl-o h 2. stress-ng-brk is trying to make progress in OOM, but is heavily contenting for what seems like lru lock 3. The network driver is trying to serve softirq's and fails to process them as allocation fails and does a dump_stack() In the other case (based on logs and limited testing - kernel 698f415cf5756e320623bdb015a600945743377c for me) 1. OOM proceeds quickly and stress-ng-brk is OOM'd frequently 2. At some point when all stress-ng-brk seem to be OOM'd the test completes I think the test relies on all stress-ng-brk's to OOM before considering completion (I could be wrong), but in this case progress is slow, but the system is responding. I am going to try the kernel listed here We believe that the test may require multiple iterations of running for check for consistency of commits. At this point I think the test will progress and needs longer and progress is slow. I think the expectation is that it needs to complete faster; the system is not lock'd up completely as far as I can tell. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573062 Title: memory_stress_ng failing for IBM Power S812LC(TN71-BP012) for 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1573062/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 493156] Re: Please enable CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Christian Kujau 493...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Whooha, language! And I think they fixed it, albeit in a weird way: CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT is enabled in the kernel config, but the feature is still disabled unless the kernel is booted with delayacct as a boot parameter, see my comment above. I am not sure who made the decision and on what data, but TASK_DELAY_ACCT should be the least of the problems when it comes to overheads. The correct path IMHO is to show us the overhead and lets fix it if it is unacceptable Balbir -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493156 Title: Please enable CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iotop/+bug/493156/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 598335] Re: gnome locks up with cgroup-bin installed
I took a quick look and found all rtnl paths waiting on mutex_lock. The stuck tasks were gnome-panel, ureadahead and workqueues (modprobe, waiting on a lock).. I also found wpa_supplicant waiting on [ 240.393172] [c05739d5] schedule_timeout+0x185/0x200 [ 240.393181] [c012e7a0] ? __wake_up_common+0x40/0x70 [ 240.393191] [c0132f90] ? __wake_up+0x40/0x50 [ 240.393200] [c05736f2] wait_for_common+0xa2/0x120 [ 240.393209] [c013c4a0] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x10 [ 240.393218] [c0573802] wait_for_completion+0x12/0x20 [ 240.393228] [c01568b7] call_usermodehelper_exec+0xc7/0xd0 The rtnl_lock() is held in wext_ioctl_dispatch() (from what I can see). Observations 1. I don't see cgroup showing up anywhere in the stack Questions 1. What is the user mode helper? It seems like it is holding/blocking the rest of the system from making progress. Can we please get the output of cat /proc/mounts and the cgroup filesystem output, please? -- gnome locks up with cgroup-bin installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 493156] Re: Please enable CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT
Can someone help characterize the performance hit with perf data or oprofile data using a standard benchmark? When we developed the feature we ran a large set of benchmarks to ensure there is no visible performance hit. If there is a hit or a side-effect, I would be interested in fixing it upstream so that we can enable this feature in Ubuntu. -- Please enable CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493156 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] Re: [needs-packaging] libcgroup
Hi, Jon, Others Could someone confirm the license change. I like the split of the packages, we would like the work to LGPL'ed, dpkg --license shows GPL. Am I missing something? Balbir Singh. -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] Re: [needs-packaging] libcgroup
Hi, Jon, We need to change the licensing of parse.[ch] to LGPL (the copyright says that we can distribute the generated files under a different license if it is a part of a larger program) and we prefer LGPL. Could you please change the copyright to reflect that. In the case of pam_cgroup, I need to clarify from Vivek, he redistributed the code under LGPL (see the last para in the copyright). Thanks for all your help! -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] Re: [needs-packaging] libcgroup
Thanks, Jon, I saw some review comments there, In the beginning I had mentioned the license as LGPL, I wonder why it is being interpreted as GPL or am I missing something? -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] Re: [needs-packaging] libcgroup
Hi, Jon, Could you post your changes to libcg mailing list. libcg- de...@lists.sourceforge.net. We'll review and make the changes needed and also put a longer term TODO to fix RPATH correctly Thanks, -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] Re: [needs-packaging] libcgroup
Hi, Jon Thanks for all your effort with the entire packaging, I've been starved for bandwidth due to various reasons. I'll take a TODO to fix the rpath issue in the library and work on it. Thanks again! -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] Re: [needs-packaging] libcgroup
Thanks, I'll take a look. I was in the process of figuring out how to remove rpath, chrpath looks like a good solution, but I wanted to change automake and libtool to do the right thing. -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] Re: [needs-packaging] libcgroup
Sorry for holding you up Jon, I was in the process of getting debian up and running so that I could try the same build scripts on my machine, but alas migration is very hard. I am trying to setup a virtual machine for it. Thanks for the offer to write lsb compliant scripts, I think that would really help. The rpath is something I've been looking at. So far, I've seen recommendations at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/09/msg00099.html rpath is added by libtool and can be stripped using chrpath. I am also looking at other packages to see how this needs to be resolved. -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] Re: [needs-packaging] libcgroup
Yes, you are right we need to change that to /etc/default on debian/ubuntu, we could change the script for debian. What that means for us upstream is the need to have distro specific changes to the scripts. I'll see how to best handle that. I'd be happy to help resolve any issues. We'll remove the config.sub/guess and libcgroup.spec files in the next release. Thanks for getting this far. I'll respond to the lintian issues, just started looking at them. -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] Re: [needs-packaging] libcgroup
OK, I am uploading what I have for debian packaging as a tarball (done as a part of libcgroup FOSS.IN workout). The man pages are missing and this was done for old code, please review/update. I'll help out, feel free to use this forum or any other to help drive this to completion. Thanks, Balbir ** Attachment added: debian-packaging.tar.bz2 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28876749/debian-packaging.tar.bz2 -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] Re: [needs-packaging] libcgroup
I was hoping to get this packaged in Jaunty, but we could not. I have some initial work done for packaging for Ubuntu, should I find the right forum and post it. I'll probably need help and guidance. Balbir -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] Re: [needs-packaging] libcgroup
I know it is sort of late for Intrepid, but it would be a nice feature to have given that we've enabled cgroups and a bunch of other controllers. One way would be to add it to Jaunty and backport it? I don't know if that is acceptable. I would really like to make libcgroup available to Ubuntu Intrepid users. Balbir -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] Re: [needs-packaging] libcgroup
I am not sure which individual(s) to subscribe to this report. I tried asking on the #ubuntu-kernel. I'll try again. -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268714] [NEW] [needs-packaging] libcgroup
Public bug reported: URL: libcg.sourceforge.net Provides a user space library, initscripts and commands to exploit the new resource management features in the kernel. Hardy and Intrepid enable the CPU controller, it would be nice to provide the user space tooling for exploitation of these features. License: LGPL ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging -- [needs-packaging] libcgroup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268714 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 163289] [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:I wasn't able to locate file for the libflac8 package. This might mean you need t
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I tried upgrading from Feisty to Gutsy and at the end the upgrade failed without a suitable reason. ProblemType: Package Date: Sat Nov 17 10:48:41 2007 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:I wasn't able to locate file for the libflac8 package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package. Package: update-manager SourcePackage: update-manager ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid -- [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:I wasn't able to locate file for the libflac8 package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 163289] Re: [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:I wasn't able to locate file for the libflac8 package. This might mean you ne
Looks like it might be a problem with the software channels. Re- installing to update since upgrade does not work ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- [apport] package update-manager failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:I wasn't able to locate file for the libflac8 package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163289 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
