[Bug 1679487] Re: PDF+LaTeX incorrectly replaces \\ (two backslashes) by a newline

2017-04-04 Thread Boris Dalstein
pdf_tex export from a previous Inkscape version (retrieve from my
archives)

** Attachment added: "mobius-vs-cylinder.pdf_tex"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1679487/+attachment/4854003/+files/mobius-vs-cylinder.pdf_tex

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679487

Title:
  PDF+LaTeX incorrectly replaces \\ (two backslashes) by a newline

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1679487/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1679487] [NEW] PDF+LaTeX incorrectly replaces \\ (two backslashes) by a newline

2017-04-04 Thread Boris Dalstein
Public bug reported:

I have an SVG file which contains text like such, the important part
being the double backslash:

$\sboundary f = 
\left[\begin{array}{c} 
\gamma_1 = [ (e^\circ, \top) ] \\
\gamma_2 = [ (e^\circ, \top) ]
\end{array}\right]$

Using Inkscape 0.91 r13725, on Kubuntu 16.04 64bits, PDF+LaTeX converts
the text to the following, that is, replaces the double backslashes by a
newline!



\put(0.50170692,0.32122315){\color[rgb]{0,0,0}\makebox(0,0)[b]{\smash{$\sboundary
 f = 
  \left[\begin{array}{c} 
  \gamma_1 = [ (e^\circ, \top) ] 
 
  \gamma_2 = [ (e^\circ, \top) ]
  \end{array}\right]$}}}%

Which makes LaTeX crash with the error:

Runaway argument?
{$\sboundary f = \left [\begin {array}{c} \gamma _1 = [ (e^\circ , \top \ETC.
! Paragraph ended before \makesm@sh was complete.
 
   \par 
l.64   \end{array}\right]$}}}
 %

I do need the backslashes so that the array environment knows where the
next row starts. It seems Inkscape is trying to be too smart. In a
previous version of Inkscape (sorry, I don't know which), this text used
to be correctly exported as the following:


\put(0.50170692,0.32122315){\color[rgb]{0,0,0}\makebox(0,0)[b]{\smash{$\sboundary
 f = 
\left[\begin{array}{c} 
\gamma_1 = [ (e^\circ, \top) ] \\
\gamma_2 = [ (e^\circ, \top) ]
\end{array}\right]$}}}%

** Affects: inkscape (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "mobius-vs-cylinder.svg"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679487/+attachment/4854000/+files/mobius-vs-cylinder.svg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679487

Title:
  PDF+LaTeX incorrectly replaces \\ (two backslashes) by a newline

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1679487/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1679487] Re: PDF+LaTeX incorrectly replaces \\ (two backslashes) by a newline

2017-04-04 Thread Boris Dalstein
PDF export

** Attachment added: "mobius-vs-cylinder.pdf"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1679487/+attachment/4854001/+files/mobius-vs-cylinder.pdf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679487

Title:
  PDF+LaTeX incorrectly replaces \\ (two backslashes) by a newline

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1679487/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1679487] Re: PDF+LaTeX incorrectly replaces \\ (two backslashes) by a newline

2017-04-04 Thread Boris Dalstein
pdf_tex export

** Attachment added: "mobius-vs-cylinder.pdf_tex"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1679487/+attachment/4854002/+files/mobius-vs-cylinder.pdf_tex

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679487

Title:
  PDF+LaTeX incorrectly replaces \\ (two backslashes) by a newline

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1679487/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1679487] Re: PDF+LaTeX incorrectly replaces \\ (two backslashes) by a newline

2017-04-04 Thread Boris Dalstein
Note: this SVG file also exhibits the following export error:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1417470

I fixed it by using the following definition of \includesvg, inspired by
one comment in the above bug:

\newcommand{\includesvg}[2][]{%
\executeiffilenewer{images/#2.svg}{images/#2.pdf}%
{\unexpanded{PDF_FILE="./images/#2.pdf"; inkscape -z --file=./images/#2.svg 
--export-pdf=$PDF_FILE --export-latex; sed -i 's//\n/g' ${PDF_FILE}_tex; 
MAXPAGE=$(pdfinfo $PDF_FILE | grep -oP "(?<=Pages:)\s*[0-9]+" | tr -d " ") ; 
sed -i "/page=$(($MAXPAGE+1))/,\${/page=/d}" ${PDF_FILE}_tex; } }
\ifthenelse{\isempty{#1}}{\small}{#1}
\input{images/#2.pdf_tex}%
}

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679487

Title:
  PDF+LaTeX incorrectly replaces \\ (two backslashes) by a newline

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inkscape/+bug/1679487/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1417470] Re: PDF+Latex export creates multipage pdf, pages missing

2017-04-03 Thread Boris Dalstein
Just adding my voice here. This bug makes PDF+LaTeX pretty unusable as
of now. Rolling back to previous behaviour seems advisable, at least
until an actual fix is made.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417470

Title:
  PDF+Latex export creates multipage pdf, pages missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/1417470/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1509846] Re: lightdm crashes on window open in Ubuntu 15.10 intel

2015-11-15 Thread Boris Dalstein
Sorry, I meant Kubuntu 15.10.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509846

Title:
  lightdm crashes on window open in Ubuntu 15.10 intel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1509846/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1509846] Re: lightdm crashes on window open in Ubuntu 15.10 intel

2015-11-15 Thread Boris Dalstein
I am experiencing the same issue, but on Kubuntu 15.04. I experience a
crash that logs me out every few hours or so, for seemingly random
actions, but it might indeed be when a new window is created. Last crash
was when doing "Ctrl+T" on Google Chrome to open a new tab. Attached is
the corresponding Xorg log.

** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1509846/+attachment/4519815/+files/Xorg.0.log.old

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509846

Title:
  lightdm crashes on window open in Ubuntu 15.10 intel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1509846/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 683557] Re: nspluginwrapper: double free or corruption (out): 0x000000000087de10

2011-08-17 Thread Boris Dalstein
Also got this problem (Kubuntu 11.04, 64 bits) today after desinstalling
and reinstalling nspluginwrapper to update flashplayer, following this:
http://doc.ubuntu-fr.org/flashplayer

deleting all the files in /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins and reconfigure
dkpg solved the problem too:

cd /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/
sudo rm *
sudo dpkg --configure -a

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683557

Title:
  nspluginwrapper: double free or corruption (out): 0x0087de10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/683557/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 787855] Re: SD Card Reader not working on ASUS G53SW

2011-07-22 Thread Boris Dalstein
Hi,

same bug here, with Kubuntu 11.04 (I tried both 32bits or 64bits), on a
Asus G53SW. The SD card reader doesn't work at all. I can see nowhere it
has been detected. No mention it in dmesg, as the first report said.

I cannot tune precisely the backlight but, I still can have it switch
on/off, so that's ok for me (but having it is important to me...). The
sound control doesn't work either, but I don't really care... my problem
is really the SD Card, I'll probably try back with Ubuntu 10.04 :-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787855

Title:
  SD Card Reader not working on ASUS G53SW

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/787855/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


RE : [Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple apps)

2010-08-10 Thread Boris Dalstein
Le 10 août 2010 08:46, Bug Watch Updater 403...@bugs.launchpad.net a
écrit :

** Changed in: beagle
  Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

** Changed in: banshee
  Status: Confirmed = Fix Released


-- 
Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background
(multiple apps)
https://b...
Status in Banshee Music Player: Fix Released
Status in Beagle Desktop Search: Fix Released

Status in a fast and powerful GTK+ based mail client: Unknown
Status in Desktop Drapes wallpaper man...

-- 
Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple 
apps)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403135
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple apps)

2010-08-08 Thread Boris Dalstein
In my case :
Lucid Lynx 32bits, default theme, nVidia card with Xinerama enabled : all (as 
far as I know) apps in the notification-area have a white background. (If 
Xinerama is disabled, the bug disappear in my configuration...)

I've tried to fix this by modifying the source code of gnome-panel (see
attachment) : I commented out things in appletsnotification-areana-
tray-child.cna_tray_child_realize(GtkWidget *widget) in order to always
use the default alpha drawing mode (it is said that the icon will sit
on top of an ugly gray box). This worked for me, and for other people.
See http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1427968page=5 post #48
(I'm seb_42) for more information.

However, in my configuration, this fix seems only to work for the
default theme. So it's clearly not a clean solution, but I thought I had
to post my modifications here, in case it can help.

** Attachment added: commented source code (and binary for 10.04 32bits) that 
work for the default theme of Lucid
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53286354/notification-area_fix.tar.gz

-- 
Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple 
apps)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403135
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403135] Re: Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple apps)

2010-08-08 Thread Boris Dalstein
(and sorry if the file I added as a patch isn't in the expected form :
it contain all the .c file. I'm not very used to launchpad/debugging
tools)

-- 
Notification area icon wrongly rendered/uses bg_color as a background (multiple 
apps)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403135
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 547147] Re: [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID

2010-07-22 Thread Boris Dalstein
I've decided to test 64bits system, after some years beeing afraid by
them, due to a bad experience xD

Thus, on my Toshiba portege A600 (Intel Core 2 Duo U9300) I've installed
Win 7 Pro 64bits, and just after Lucid 64bits. And I'm facing the same
errors (see below).

All was OK at the installation and on first boot. (Win 7 was even correctly 
recognized ;-) )
Then I installed the French language package, and all goes wrong. Not only I 
had the raw edid error, but also Ubuntu refused to start. In recovery mode, I 
desinstalled the french language package  (apt-get remove language-pack-fr), 
reboot, and all was ok again. Yeah, seems pretty strange... but really, I tried 
a lot of things, and gdm had never accepted to start. At last, I've rebooted in 
recovery mode, and the ONLY things I've done is apt-get remove 
language-pack-fr and reboot, and I didn't had anymore the raw edid errors, 
and Ubuntu worked fine again.

Then I installed the new kernel (2.6.32-21 - 2.6.32-23), and again, I
have the errors below. Nevertheless, I can start Ubuntu this time, even
if it seems quite slow. I'll try the kernel above, and give a feedback.


[   16.034972] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   16.035021] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   16.035025] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   16.035028] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   16.035031] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   16.035034] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   16.035037] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   16.035040] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   16.035043] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   16.035045] 
[   21.871057] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   21.871107] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   21.871110] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   21.871113] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   21.871116] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   21.871119] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   21.871122] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   21.871125] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   21.871128] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   21.871130] 
[   24.652533] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
[   28.084881] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   28.084930] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   28.084933] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   28.084936] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   28.084939] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   28.084942] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   28.084945] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   28.084948] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   28.084951] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   28.084953] 
[   34.816301] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   34.816351] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   34.816355] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   34.816358] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   34.816361] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   34.816364] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   34.816367] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   34.816370] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   34.816372] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   34.816375] 
[   34.816379] i915 :00:02.0: LVDS-1: EDID invalid.
[   41.588992] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   41.589040] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   41.589043] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   41.589046] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   41.589049] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   41.589052] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   41.589055] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   41.589058] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   41.589061] 300 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  

[   41.589063] 
[   47.871600] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   47.871649] 300 00 00 00 00 

[Bug 547147] Re: [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID

2010-07-22 Thread Boris Dalstein
nothing changed with http://people.canonical.com/~smb/i915-edid-test
/linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic_2.6.32-23.38~edidtest1_amd64.deb

dmesg | grep drm : (the all log output is attached, quite irrelevant in
my opinion, but maybe could help):

[0.00] Linux version 2.6.32-23-generic (r...@magrathea) (gcc version 
4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) ) #38~edidtest1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 28 15:08:00 
UTC 2010 (Ubuntu 2.6.32-23.38~edidtest1-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5)
[   10.411371] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
[   10.760216] [drm] set up 127M of stolen space
[   16.211782] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   21.754385] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   27.47] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   33.475161] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   39.774364] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   45.597159] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   51.438251] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   57.395996] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   57.416974] fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device
[   57.421580] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for :00:02.0 on minor 0
[   65.261873] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   72.184050] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[   79.435975] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[  101.246234] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:
[  125.844162] [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID:

** Attachment added: allDmesg
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52324011/allDmesg

-- 
 [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/547147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 547147] Re: [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID

2010-07-22 Thread Boris Dalstein
ok, I just find out that the errors are present in the old kernel too
(2.6.32.21, see attachement), it just appears that they are not
displayed at startup.

-- 
 [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/547147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 547147] Re: [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID

2010-07-22 Thread Boris Dalstein

** Attachment added: Dmesg_kernel_2.6.32.21
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52324382/Dmesg_kernel_2.6.32.21

-- 
 [drm:edid_is_valid] *ERROR* Raw EDID
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/547147
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs