[Bug 947375] Re: linux: 2.6.32-40.87 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel. ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947375 Title: linux: 2.6.32-40.87 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/947375/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 959494] Re: [HP Probook 6550b] Fails to start graphical environment
Daniel, Can you furnish this bug with: Xorg.0.log gdm.log dpkg.log Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959494 Title: [HP Probook 6550b] Fails to start graphical environment To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/959494/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947375] Re: linux: 2.6.32-40.87 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification has completed testing on 44/45 systems. One system is inaccessible in the lab. No regressions were detected and results are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru- testing/wk12_2012/lucid-proposed.html ** Tags added: certification-testing-passed ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947375 Title: linux: 2.6.32-40.87 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/947375/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942572] Re: Notify OSD panel is opaque when shown in the installer
I've seen this now on a Samsung N310 with Intel Mobile Graphics (945GM I think) and also on the ARM Pandaboard. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942572 Title: Notify OSD panel is opaque when shown in the installer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/notify-osd/+bug/942572/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 834731] Re: Dell PowerEdge R810 fails to mount file system at /dev/sda1
Hi, We wiped the disk and the problem is not reproducible anymore. This might make it a bit difficult to debug... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834731 Title: Dell PowerEdge R810 fails to mount file system at /dev/sda1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hw-labs/+bug/834731/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 873117] Re: Broadcom STA driver from bcmwl-kernel-source should blacklist other Broadcom drivers
** Tags added: precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873117 Title: Broadcom STA driver from bcmwl-kernel-source should blacklist other Broadcom drivers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/873117/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 914983] Re: [Thinkpad X121e][AMD] Wifi is nonfunctional
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 873117 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873117 ** Tags removed: blocks-hwcert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914983 Title: [Thinkpad X121e][AMD] Wifi is nonfunctional To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/914983/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after exercising frequency governors
I can't reproduce this problem except on first boot, so I'm unable to install new kernels and test them. It's still present in Precise Beta 1 though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after exercising frequency governors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 953160] Re: mediacard/sd test doesn't complete
Please also take into account that we have an identical problem on other systems where the card reader is on the SCSI bus. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953160 Title: mediacard/sd test doesn't complete To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/953160/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942789] Re: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device
** Also affects: network-manager Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789 Title: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/942789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942789] Re: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device
** Project changed: network-manager = network-manager (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789 Title: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/942789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942789] Re: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20120121) Package: network-manager PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en TERM=xterm LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.29-generic 3.2.9 Tags: precise Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-15 (28 days ago) UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo ** Tags added: apport-collected -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789 Title: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/942789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942789] .home.brendand..cache.checkbox.checkbox.log.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: .home.brendand..cache.checkbox.checkbox.log.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789/+attachment/2870094/+files/.home.brendand..cache.checkbox.checkbox.log.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789 Title: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/942789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942789] .home.brendand..cache.checkbox.submission.xml.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: .home.brendand..cache.checkbox.submission.xml.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789/+attachment/2870095/+files/.home.brendand..cache.checkbox.submission.xml.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789 Title: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/942789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942789] Dependencies.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789/+attachment/2870096/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789 Title: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/942789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942789] Re: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device
Here is the contents of syslog from when the scenario is run (wifi disconnected and then reconnected using nmcli con up). Network Manager has it's log level set to debug ** Attachment added: network-manager syslog https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/942789/+attachment/2870282/+files/nm-syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789 Title: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/942789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 953160] Re: mediacard/sd test doesn't complete
Let's not do anything rash until we check a couple more things:
Haggai, can you run:
import dbus
bus = dbus.SystemBus()
ud_mgr_obj = bus.get_object(org.freedesktop.UDisks, /org/freedesktop/UDisks)
ud_mgr = dbus.Interface(ud_mgr_obj, org.freedesktop.UDisks)
for dev in ud_mgr.EnumerateDevices():
try:
device_obj = bus.get_object(org.freedesktop.UDisks, dev)
device_props = dbus.Interface(device_obj, dbus.PROPERTIES_IFACE)
if device_props.Get('org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device', DeviceIsDrive):
print device_props.Get('org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device',
DeviceFile)
print device_props.Get('org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device',
DriveConnectionInterface)
print device_props.Get('org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device',
DriveMedia)
and paste the output here.
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953160
Title:
mediacard/sd test doesn't complete
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/953160/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 953160] Re: mediacard/sd test doesn't complete
Yah, stupid copy and paste :P The output of udisks is very interesting. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953160 Title: mediacard/sd test doesn't complete To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/953160/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942789] Re: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device
It's true that the script shouldn't try and disconnect already inactive devices, but at the same time the whole concept of testing wireless before and after suspend depends on their being a pre-existing wireless connection. You *should* have been prompted to create one before this test ran (by virtue of the networking/wireless_connection running). Can you confirm if that was the case? If not we'll need to fix things so that networking/wireless_connection does run beforehand. I'm not saying this isn't a bug, but at best it's a matter of just prettifying the error - the test will and should fail anyway. ** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789 Title: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/942789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942789] Re: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device
Gah, ignore that comment. As you mentioned you do have wlan0 activated... ** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Low = High ** Also affects: checkbox Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: checkbox Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: checkbox Assignee: (unassigned) = Checkbox Developers (checkbox-dev) ** Changed in: checkbox Milestone: None = 0.13.5 ** Changed in: checkbox Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789 Title: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/942789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942789] Re: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device
Having got to the bottom of this issue, this is actually not a bug in Checkbox, but the nmcli tool used to drive the test. This: Error: Device 'eth0' (/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1) disconnecting failed: This device is not active is not what is causing the test to fail. This is: ** WARNING **: handle_property_changed: failed to update property 'active-connections' of object type NMClient. Error: Timeout 90 sec expired. and it's (mostly) unrelated. We can still change the test so that it doesn't try and do pointless stuff like deactivating already inactive connections but that isn't the crux of the issue and isn't a considerable problem. ** Changed in: checkbox Importance: High = Low ** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Importance: High = Low ** Changed in: checkbox Milestone: 0.13.5 = None ** Changed in: checkbox Assignee: Checkbox Developers (checkbox-dev) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942789 Title: suspend/wireless_before_suspend tries to disconnect an inactive device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/942789/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947431] Re: [Lenovo e320] - Checkbox - removable_storage_test fails, manual operation works.
Greg, I feel pretty sure this is a checkbox bug. Just to make sure, can you paste the output of the command? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947431 Title: [Lenovo e320] - Checkbox - removable_storage_test fails, manual operation works. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/947431/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 953160] Re: mediacard/sd test doesn't complete
I suspect this could be because your card reader is on the scsi bus
rather than the sdio bus. Can you put this in a script and run it?
import dbus
bus = dbus.SystemBus()
ud_mgr_obj = bus.get_object(org.freedesktop.UDisks, /org/freedesktop/UDisks)
ud_mgr = dbus.Interface(ud_mgr_obj, org.freedesktop.UDisks)
for dev in ud_mgr.EnumerateDevices():
try:
device_obj = bus.get_object(org.freedesktop.UDisks, dev)
device_props = dbus.Interface(device_obj, dbus.PROPERTIES_IFACE)
if device_props.Get('org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device', DeviceIsDrive):
print device_props.Get('org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device',
DeviceFile)
print device_props.Get('org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device',
DriveConnectionInterface)
except dbus.DBusException:
pass
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953160
Title:
mediacard/sd test doesn't complete
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/953160/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 944939] Re: [Lenovo e320] Checkbox fails to detect the SD and SDHC - Manual test works fine
Hi Greg,
When you get a chance can you run this script as well?
import dbus
bus = dbus.SystemBus()
ud_mgr_obj = bus.get_object(org.freedesktop.UDisks, /org/freedesktop/UDisks)
ud_mgr = dbus.Interface(ud_mgr_obj, org.freedesktop.UDisks)
for dev in ud_mgr.EnumerateDevices():
try:
device_obj = bus.get_object(org.freedesktop.UDisks, dev)
device_props = dbus.Interface(device_obj, dbus.PROPERTIES_IFACE)
if device_props.Get('org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device', DeviceIsDrive):
print device_props.Get('org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device',
DeviceFile)
print device_props.Get('org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device',
DriveConnectionInterface)
print device_props.Get('org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device',
DeviceIsRemovable)
print
device_props.Get('org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device','DriveMediaCompatibility')
I'm hoping DriveMediaCompatibility isn't a fibber and we can use that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/944939
Title:
[Lenovo e320] Checkbox fails to detect the SD and SDHC - Manual test
works fine
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/944939/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931661] Re: linux: 3.0.0-16.29 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification have completed testing 53/55 systems with this -proposed kernel. Apologies for the delay, we've had a large burden on our labs and a few teething issues with new tests added, but from the results that have come in we don't detect any regressions. The report, as usual is available at: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru- testing/wk09_2012/oneiric-proposed.html ** Tags added: certification-testing-passed ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931661 Title: linux: 3.0.0-16.29 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/931661/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619395] Re: kmail: text mails should be displayed with a monospace font by default
Importance set to Wishlist as suggested by veger on #ubuntu-bugs ** Changed in: kdepim (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdepim in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619395 Title: kmail: text mails should be displayed with a monospace font by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/619395/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 944939] Re: [Lenovo e320] Checkbox fails to detect the SD and SDHC - Manual test works fine
On 05/03/12 19:17, Jeff Lane wrote: On 03/03/2012 01:42 PM, Brendan Donegan wrote: I'm curious to know what kind of icon displays on the launcher when the card is inserted? Is it an SD card icon or a plain old disk icon? If it's an SD card icon that would be good, as at least *someone* knows how to tell that an SD card reader is on the SCSI bus. If it's a plain old disk then maybe we're scuppered and need to rethink this test. ** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete I wonder if this is one of those systems that would cause other failures like the storage_test script picking up the empty SD slot as a full block device... we hates these machines... hates them we do. Could be, but the storage_test was adapted to check the size before running so this problem shouldn't occur anymore. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/944939 Title: [Lenovo e320] Checkbox fails to detect the SD and SDHC - Manual test works fine To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/944939/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 944939] Re: [Lenovo e320] Checkbox fails to detect the SD and SDHC - Manual test works fine
If we just add test for the scsi category then the test may pick up any hard disk, not necessarily one with an SD card reader on it. I want to have a look at the system to see if UDisks has some way of telling the difference, but currently it isn't accessible in the lab. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/944939 Title: [Lenovo e320] Checkbox fails to detect the SD and SDHC - Manual test works fine To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/944939/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947366] Re: [Lenovo e320] - cpu_scaling_test Fails
In this case it looks like the test passed, so the failure may be a one off. The outcome of this test is influenced by the system load at the time the test is run, and we try our best to limit this effect. For example the 'nice -n 20' runs the cpu_scaling_test with a very low 'niceness' level, meaning that it tries to steal all the cpu cycles. If there are a lot of other 'not nice' processes running at the same time this could impact the outcome. It's important not to do *any* other tasks on a test system while Checkbox is running or else the outcomes could be influenced by them. Run the command again and immediately after, echo $?. This will tell you the result - do this five times and if the result is always 0 then close the bug as Invalid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947366 Title: [Lenovo e320] - cpu_scaling_test Fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/947366/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931661] Re: linux: 3.0.0-16.29 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification has started testing this kernel. ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931661 Title: linux: 3.0.0-16.29 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/931661/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947366] Re: [Lenovo e320] - CPU Test Fails
Hi Greg, Can you please locate the test, run the command and post the output here? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947366 Title: [Lenovo e320] - CPU Test Fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/947366/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947366] Re: [Lenovo e320] - CPU Test Fails
Jeff, It's more correct to say the test *was* flaky. We run it regularly during SRU testing and rarely have problems. If it's failing, consistently, on a system then it should be taken seriously. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947366 Title: [Lenovo e320] - CPU Test Fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/947366/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 944939] Re: [Lenovo e320] Checkbox fails to detect the SD and SDHC - Manual test works fine
I'm curious to know what kind of icon displays on the launcher when the card is inserted? Is it an SD card icon or a plain old disk icon? If it's an SD card icon that would be good, as at least *someone* knows how to tell that an SD card reader is on the SCSI bus. If it's a plain old disk then maybe we're scuppered and need to rethink this test. ** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/944939 Title: [Lenovo e320] Checkbox fails to detect the SD and SDHC - Manual test works fine To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/944939/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931647] Re: linux: 2.6.32-39.86 -proposed tracker
** Tags added: certification-testing-passed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931647 Title: linux: 2.6.32-39.86 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/931647/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931647] Re: linux: 2.6.32-39.86 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification has completed testing on 45/46 systems. One system was inaccesible in the lab. No failures were detected in the systems that reported results. The report is available here: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/wk09_2012/lucid- proposed.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931647 Title: linux: 2.6.32-39.86 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/931647/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 943498] Re: [HP Compaq 6000 Pro] - Wireless NOT working in 10.04.4
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-10.04.4 = None -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943498 Title: [HP Compaq 6000 Pro] - Wireless NOT working in 10.04.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/943498/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942572] Re: Notify OSD panel is opaque when shown in the installer
It's Unity 3D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942572 Title: Notify OSD panel is opaque when shown in the installer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/942572/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942572] Re: Notify OSD panel is opaque when shown in the installer
For this bug to occur you need to go straight to 'Install Ubuntu'. Once you're in the live session the notifications appear fine, even when running Ubiquity. I'm trying to get a screenshot but I can't find where the image files are going (they don't end up in ~/Pictures) ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942572 Title: Notify OSD panel is opaque when shown in the installer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/942572/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942572] [NEW] Notify OSD panel is opaque when shown in the installer
Public bug reported: When notify-osd triggers during the install (such as when networks are detected or connected to) the panel shown is fully opaque. The border is dark grey and the centre is some random color (mainly aubergine, sometime orange, red or even blue). The same problem is not exhibited in the live session, otherwise I would assign this against notify-osd itself. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubiquity 2.9.22 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.27-generic-pae 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 CasperVersion: 1.304 Date: Tue Feb 28 11:56:04 2012 InstallCmdLine: noprompt cdrom-detect/try-usb=true file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- maybe-ubiquity LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta i386 (20120228) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise ubiquity-2.9.22 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942572 Title: Notify OSD panel is opaque when shown in the installer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/942572/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942572] Re: Notify OSD panel is opaque when shown in the installer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942572 Title: Notify OSD panel is opaque when shown in the installer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/942572/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942030] [NEW] 'Take a photo' preview pane not showing live preview
Public bug reported: The 'Take a photo' preview pane appears as empty to begin with. Clicking 'Take photo' will take a photo succesfully, so the webcam hardware is not dysfunctional. It then shows the photo below the preview pane (where it is supposed to go) and in the preview pane itself. There is never any live preview. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubiquity 2.9.21 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.27-generic-pae 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 CasperVersion: 1.304 Date: Mon Feb 27 15:45:59 2012 InstallCmdLine: noprompt cdrom-detect/try-usb=true file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- maybe-ubiquity LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta i386 (20120227) ProcEnviron: TERM=linux LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 iso-testing precise ubi-webcam ubiquity-2.9.21 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942030 Title: 'Take a photo' preview pane not showing live preview To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/942030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942030] Re: 'Take a photo' preview pane not showing live preview
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942030 Title: 'Take a photo' preview pane not showing live preview To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/942030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942078] [NEW] Initial attempt to connect to U1 service exhibits frequent disconnect/reconnects
Public bug reported: On this freshly installed system the first thing I attempted to do was setup Ubuntu One. After installing the client I waited for the folder list to appear so I could select folders to sync. Every few minutes the status pane would say that File Sync was disconnected. A few moments after that it would attempt to reconnect again. After a while I got tired of waiting and rebooted the system. Soon after that the folder list got synced and I everything seemed to be working normally. Hopefully the correct logs are attached here to diagnose this. Please get in touch if you need me to reproduce the problem. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubuntuone-control-panel 2.99.5-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.27-generic-pae 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Feb 27 16:50:37 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta i386 (20120227) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubuntuone-control-panel UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubuntuone-control-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942078 Title: Initial attempt to connect to U1 service exhibits frequent disconnect/reconnects To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-control-panel/+bug/942078/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942078] Re: Initial attempt to connect to U1 service exhibits frequent disconnect/reconnects
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942078 Title: Initial attempt to connect to U1 service exhibits frequent disconnect/reconnects To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-control-panel/+bug/942078/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 931647] Re: linux: 2.6.32-39.86 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification has begun testing this -proposed kernel. ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Assignee: Canonical Hardware Certification (canonical-hw-cert) = Brendan Donegan (brendan-donegan) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931647 Title: linux: 2.6.32-39.86 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/931647/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 848553] Re: suspend-test doesn't detect suspends
The suspend_test script is deprecated, in fact you will find it's not used by any job in the Ubuntu Friendly tests. To test suspend as we do for Ubuntu Friendly you should use: sudo /usr/share/checkbox/scripts/sleep_test -d In theory we should remove the script which is no longer used. In practice an SRU to simply remove script is not worth the effort. ** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid ** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Importance: High = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848553 Title: suspend-test doesn't detect suspends To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/848553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937934] [NEW] Rhythmbox integration with indicator-sound is broken
Public bug reported: I have none of the following problems with Banshee, so I'm pinning these on Rhythmbox. 1.) Selecting the 'Rhythmbox' option from the menu of indicator-sound doesn't do anything. It should open an instance of the application 2.) While a track is playing, clicking the large 'Play' button on the menu causes a 'waiting' icon to appear on the button, but nothing ever happens (I need to kill indicator-sound for the play icon to reappear) 3.) No track information is displayed on the menu. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: rhythmbox 2.95-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.92-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Feb 21 16:46:03 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20120121) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: rhythmbox UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-15 (6 days ago) ** Affects: indicator-sound (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937934 Title: Rhythmbox integration with indicator-sound is broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-sound/+bug/937934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937934] Re: Integration with indicator-sound is broken
** Also affects: indicator-sound (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Integration with indicator-sound is broken + Rhythmbox ntegration with indicator-sound is broken ** Summary changed: - Rhythmbox ntegration with indicator-sound is broken + Rhythmbox integration with indicator-sound is broken -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937934 Title: Rhythmbox integration with indicator-sound is broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-sound/+bug/937934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930223] Re: does not start without python-datetime
Hi, What version are you using? Running 'apport-collect 930223' could be useful. It's not true to say that Checkbox depends on that specific package (well, it might if you are talking about an older version). I'm running Precise and python-datetime itself is not installed, but the datetime module may well be provided by another package. ** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930223 Title: does not start without python-datetime To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/930223/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922692] Re: linux: 3.0.0-16.28 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification has completed testing on 54/55 systems for the Oneiric -proposed kernel. One system could not be tested due to a hardware fault. All other results look fine: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/wk06_2012/oneiric- proposed.html ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: In Progress = Fix Released ** Tags added: certification-testing-passed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922692 Title: linux: 3.0.0-16.28 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/922692/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 928980] [NEW] Browser generated audio comes out the wrong sink
Public bug reported: This is only happening after a recent update, which may have included changes to PulseAudio, I'm not sure. Anyway - the steps to reproduce on my system are: 1. Run pacmd 2. Run list-sinks to see if the C-Media_USB_Audio_Device is selected (has an asterisk next to it) 3. Run set-default-sink if necessary 4. Open Firefox and go to Youtube and play a video 5. Observer the sound is coming from the internal audio not the headset 6. Open Rythmbox and play an MP3, observe the sound coming correctly from the headset 7. Run list-sink-inputs and note that only the Rythmbox sink is listed even though both are playing sound Expected result: Sound comes out the default sink at all times Actual result: Sound from the browser is not managed by PulseAudio and is just going out the default ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: pulseaudio 1:1.1-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-14.23-generic 3.2.3 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-14-generic x86_64 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xd842 irq 48' Mixer name : 'Analog Devices AD1984A' Components : 'HDA:11d4194a,103c30dc,00100400 HDA:11c11040,103c1378,00100200' Controls : 18 Simple ctrls : 11 Card1.Amixer.info: Card hw:1 'Device'/'C-Media USB Audio Device at usb-:00:1a.7-4.1, full speed' Mixer name : 'USB Mixer' Components : 'USB0d8c:0008' Controls : 5 Simple ctrls : 3 Date: Wed Feb 8 16:42:21 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20120121) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: pulseaudio UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-06 (2 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 06/08/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.bios.version: 68PCD Ver. F.19 dmi.board.name: 30DC dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: KBC Version 87.2B dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr68PCDVer.F.19:bd06/08/2010:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPEliteBook6930p:pvrF.19:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn30DC:rvrKBCVersion87.2B:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvr: dmi.product.name: HP EliteBook 6930p dmi.product.version: F.19 dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard ** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928980 Title: Browser generated audio comes out the wrong sink To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/928980/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 928980] Re: Browser generated audio comes out the wrong sink
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928980 Title: Browser generated audio comes out the wrong sink To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/928980/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 928980] Re: flash audio, and other alsa-plugin apps, do not use PulseAudio
** Description changed: This is only happening after a recent update, which may have included changes to PulseAudio, I'm not sure. Anyway - the steps to reproduce on my system are: 1. Run pacmd 2. Run list-sinks to see if the C-Media_USB_Audio_Device is selected (has an asterisk next to it) 3. Run set-default-sink if necessary 4. Open Firefox and go to Youtube and play a video - 5. Observer the sound is coming from the internal audio not the headset + 5. Observe the sound is coming from the internal audio not the headset 6. Open Rythmbox and play an MP3, observe the sound coming correctly from the headset 7. Run list-sink-inputs and note that only the Rythmbox sink is listed even though both are playing sound Expected result: Sound comes out the default sink at all times Actual result: Sound from the browser is not managed by PulseAudio and is just going out the default ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: pulseaudio 1:1.1-0ubuntu6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-14.23-generic 3.2.3 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-14-generic x86_64 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Card0.Amixer.info: - Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xd842 irq 48' -Mixer name : 'Analog Devices AD1984A' -Components : 'HDA:11d4194a,103c30dc,00100400 HDA:11c11040,103c1378,00100200' -Controls : 18 -Simple ctrls : 11 + Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xd842 irq 48' + Mixer name : 'Analog Devices AD1984A' + Components : 'HDA:11d4194a,103c30dc,00100400 HDA:11c11040,103c1378,00100200' + Controls : 18 + Simple ctrls : 11 Card1.Amixer.info: - Card hw:1 'Device'/'C-Media USB Audio Device at usb-:00:1a.7-4.1, full speed' -Mixer name : 'USB Mixer' -Components : 'USB0d8c:0008' -Controls : 5 -Simple ctrls : 3 + Card hw:1 'Device'/'C-Media USB Audio Device at usb-:00:1a.7-4.1, full speed' + Mixer name : 'USB Mixer' + Components : 'USB0d8c:0008' + Controls : 5 + Simple ctrls : 3 Date: Wed Feb 8 16:42:21 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 (20120121) ProcEnviron: - LANGUAGE=en_GB:en - PATH=(custom, no user) - LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANGUAGE=en_GB:en + PATH=(custom, no user) + LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: pulseaudio UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-06 (2 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 06/08/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.bios.version: 68PCD Ver. F.19 dmi.board.name: 30DC dmi.board.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.board.version: KBC Version 87.2B dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr68PCDVer.F.19:bd06/08/2010:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPEliteBook6930p:pvrF.19:rvnHewlett-Packard:rn30DC:rvrKBCVersion87.2B:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct10:cvr: dmi.product.name: HP EliteBook 6930p dmi.product.version: F.19 dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928980 Title: flash audio, and other alsa-plugin apps, do not use PulseAudio To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/928980/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after exercising frequency governors
Hi Joseph, The problem I have is that if I reboot the system then the problem goes away and even doesn't reoccur when I run the script which triggers it. If I could get an ISO that uses the mainline kernel or whichever kernel you want me to test with then I could be sure it does or doesn't fix the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after exercising frequency governors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 928980] Re: flash audio, and other alsa-plugin apps, do not use PulseAudio
Steve, Unless a fix is imminent it might be useful to put the workaround here (I'm asking this in selfish mode, since I want to get Flash audio working again : ) ) What do the contents of asound.conf need to be (bearing in mind that I don't seem to even have such a file in my system) Thanks, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928980 Title: flash audio, and other alsa-plugin apps, do not use PulseAudio To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/928980/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 834731] Re: [Dell PowerEdge R810] 'Prunes' fails to mount file system at /dev/sda1
** Tags added: blocks-hwcert precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834731 Title: [Dell PowerEdge R810] 'Prunes' fails to mount file system at /dev/sda1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hw-labs/+bug/834731/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 834731] Re: [Dell PowerEdge R810] 'Prunes' fails to mount file system at /dev/sda1
Hi Steve, Yeah, 'Prunes' is just the hostname - sorry if that's confusing. Since this system is in a datacenter it might take some time to process your suggestion, but we'll see if we can give it a try and I'll let you know what happens. Thanks, ** Summary changed: - [Dell PowerEdge R810] 'Prunes' fails to mount file system at /dev/sda1 + Dell PowerEdge R810 fails to mount file system at /dev/sda1 ** Description changed: - While testing the server Prunes with Oneiric Alpha3, during the - installation there is the following message: + While testing the PowerEdge R810 with hostname 'Prunes' with Oneiric + Alpha3, during the installation there is the following message: The attempt to mount a file system with the type ext4 in /dev/sda1 at / failed You may resume partitioning from the partitioning menu. Would you like to continue? See the attached screenshot. A similar issue was not seen with the Natty server image. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834731 Title: Dell PowerEdge R810 fails to mount file system at /dev/sda1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hw-labs/+bug/834731/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 834731] Re: Dell PowerEdge R810 fails to mount file system at /dev/sda1
Also, sorry if this seems like the wrong question but doesn't the fact that it worked just fine with Natty indicate it's a genuine bug (hardware config would have been identical)? It may be you just want to establish that the RAID signature is or isn't causing the bug - in which case ignore me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/834731 Title: Dell PowerEdge R810 fails to mount file system at /dev/sda1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hw-labs/+bug/834731/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 and R715 is offline by default
Another test run done today seems to indicate that the CPU is not offline initially. Perhaps one of our tests is making it go offline (this wouldn't be intentional and might still be a bug)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 and R715 is offline by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline 'randomly'
Note that this means that the problem may not actually be gone in the upstream kernel and may be present in Oneiric. We haven't specifically tested these releases in the same way yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline 'randomly' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline 'randomly'
I changed the title to further reflect the circumstances this happens in. I can't think of a better word than 'randomly' right now as the CPU is not being specifically requested to go offline and we haven't determined what the cause is yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline 'randomly' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 and R715 is offline by default
We also have an IBM X3500 M3 exhibiting the same. Common thread is still the 16 cores. CPU model doesn't seem to be the factor. ** Summary changed: - CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 and R715 is offline by default + CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline 'randomly' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline 'randomly' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline 'randomly'
This seems to be caused by running our cpu_frequency_governers test. This script is playing around with the frequency governors supported by different CPUs. I'm going to install Oneiric now and see if the same thing happens. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline 'randomly' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline 'randomly'
Confirming gain that this is *not* the case with Oneiric, even if the frequency_governors test is run ** Summary changed: - CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline 'randomly' + CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after excercising frequency governors ** Summary changed: - CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after excercising frequency governors + CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after exercising frequency governors -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after exercising frequency governors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after exercising frequency governors
Also not the case in the mainline kernel it seems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after exercising frequency governors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after exercising frequency governors
So, if I reboot the system then all the CPUs are online again. Furthermore if I rerun cpu_frequency_governors then CPU1 has not gone offline (all of this with the 3.2.0-12.21 kernel) after it finishes. This makes it difficult to determine if the problem is really gone in the mainline kernel. I would potentially need an ISO spun with the mainline kernel in it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after exercising frequency governors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922692] Re: linux: 3.0.0-16.28 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification has begun testing this -proposed kernel. ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922692 Title: linux: 3.0.0-16.28 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/922692/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926300] Re: Test descriptions in mediacards.txt are wrong
** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Brendan Donegan (brendan-donegan) ** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926300 Title: Test descriptions in mediacards.txt are wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/926300/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 and R715 is offline by default
It looks to me like the events at 1905 are associated. Not sure what is the relevance of IRQ 119. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 and R715 is offline by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926300] Re: Test descriptions in mediacards.txt are wrong
It wouldn't be present in the packaged version, only in the trunk of the bazaar tree. ** Changed in: checkbox (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926300 Title: Test descriptions in mediacards.txt are wrong To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/926300/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 920790] Re: linux: 2.6.38-13.55 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification is no longer testing Natty kernels. Can you please add our task to the blacklist? Thanks! ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Assignee: Canonical Hardware Certification (canonical-hw-cert) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920790 Title: linux: 2.6.38-13.55 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/920790/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] [NEW] CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 is offline by default
Public bug reported: Running Precise Alpha2 on a Dell PowerEdge M610 I am finding that: echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online fails because the content of the 'online' file is already 0. This means 1 of the systems 16 cores is offline by default. I have not seen this in Oneiric so I assume it's not intended. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 is offline by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 is offline by default
** Attachment added: CPU Information https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+attachment/2710633/+files/m610_cpuinfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 is offline by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 is offline by default
Attached is the cpuinfo file from the system. While getting this I made the discovery that the /sys/devices/system/cpu/online file on this system contains: 0,2-15 This would explain why one CPU is offline. ** Attachment removed: CPU Information https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+attachment/2710633/+files/m610_cpuinfo ** Attachment added: CPU Information https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+attachment/2710903/+files/M610_CPU_Info -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 is offline by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 is offline by default
I can confirm that with an Oneiric install all 16 cores are online and the contents of /sys/devices/system/cpu/online is: 0-15 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 is offline by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926136] Re: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 and R715 is offline by default
** Tags added: blocks-hwcert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136 Title: CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610 and R715 is offline by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/926136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923681] [NEW] Server install fails when selecting everything but 'VM host' 'Manual selection' from tasksel
Public bug reported: Running through the server installer, everything is progressing fine until reaching tasksel. Steps to reproduce: 1.) In tasksel select all tasks except for 'Virtual Machine host' and 'Manual package selection' 2.) Select next Expected result: Packages are installed for all of the selected tasks Actual result: Installation fails with unmet dependencies as exhibited in the attached syslog ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923681 Title: Server install fails when selecting everything but 'VM host' 'Manual selection' from tasksel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/923681/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923681] Re: Server install fails when selecting everything but VM host from tasksel
** Attachment added: installer syslog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923681/+attachment/2701059/+files/syslog.txt ** Summary changed: - Server install fails when selecting everything but VM host from tasksel + Server install fails when selecting everything but 'VM host' 'Manual selection' from tasksel -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923681 Title: Server install fails when selecting everything but 'VM host' 'Manual selection' from tasksel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/923681/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 912522] Re: usb_test fails on non-writable filesystems
Jeff, Have you tried using the 'DeviceIsReadOnly' property of org.freedesktop.UDisks.Device? That might be a straightforward way of telling if a partition is read-only. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912522 Title: usb_test fails on non-writable filesystems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/912522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 919501] Re: Checkbox bluetooth test failed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862322 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862322 Hi, Thanks for the report. We're already aware of this issue and as you can see from the duplicate bug, there is a fix being included in the next Checkbox update. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 862322 bluetooth/detect shouldn't run on a system with no Bluetooth device -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919501 Title: Checkbox bluetooth test failed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checkbox/+bug/919501/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 440889] Re: software-center crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/python2.7/bsddb/__init__.py: No module named _bsddb
Why has an old bug which has nothing to do with software-center crashing been modified to serve as the master bug for an issue in Precise? This is deeply confusing for new bug reporter, as this bug is several years old so most would think that it couldn't have anything to do with software-center in Precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440889 Title: software-center crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/python2.7/bsddb/__init__.py: No module named _bsddb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.7/+bug/440889/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 907188] Re: Asus EB1007 can't wake up from suspend when suspended using pm-suspend
The apport logs are present in https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox- satellite/+bug/907188/comments/2 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907188 Title: Asus EB1007 can't wake up from suspend when suspended using pm-suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox-satellite/+bug/907188/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 911195] Re: linux: 2.6.38-13.54 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification have completed testing of this -proposed kernel on a selection of 53 systems from our labs. No regressions were detected - results can be found at: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru- testing/wk2_2012/natty-proposed.html ** Tags added: certification-testing-passed ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911195 Title: linux: 2.6.38-13.54 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/911195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 912522] Re: usb_test fails on non-writable filesystems
I'm not sure I quite understand. With the changes you made, does the test still fail if it has any writable partitions? In my opinion it shouldn't - it just makes things confusing for the tester. As Daniel mentioned before, a good idea might be to test reading at a minimum for read-only partitions. As long as reading and/or writing works when attempted then the USB port should be fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912522 Title: usb_test fails on non-writable filesystems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/912522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 911405] Re: linux: 2.6.32-38.83 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification has completed testing on 45/46 systems (one system did not report due to faulty hardware). The report can be found here: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/wk2_2012/lucid- proposed.html ** Tags added: certification-testing-passed ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911405 Title: linux: 2.6.32-38.83 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/911405/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 911195] Re: linux: 2.6.38-13.54 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel. ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Assignee: Canonical Hardware Certification (canonical-hw-cert) = Brendan Donegan (brendan-donegan) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911195 Title: linux: 2.6.38-13.54 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/911195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 911405] Re: linux: 2.6.32-38.83 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel. ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911405 Title: linux: 2.6.32-38.83 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/911405/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 910894] Re: linux: 3.0.0-15.25 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification has finished testing 53/53 systems with the -proposed kernel. No regressions were detected. The report is available at: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/wk2_2012/oneiric- proposed.html ** Tags added: certification-testing-passed ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910894 Title: linux: 3.0.0-15.25 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/910894/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 907377] Re: HP ProLiant DL360 G6 has debootstrap errors during install of Precise Alpha 1
intel_iommu=off worked a charm. What does that mean then? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907377 Title: HP ProLiant DL360 G6 has debootstrap errors during install of Precise Alpha 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/907377/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 910894] Re: linux: 3.0.0-15.25 -proposed tracker
Hardware Certification have begun testing this kernel. ** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910894 Title: linux: 3.0.0-15.25 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/910894/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 910894] Re: linux: 3.0.0-15.25 -proposed tracker
** Changed in: kernel-sru-workflow/certification-testing Assignee: Canonical Hardware Certification (canonical-hw-cert) = Brendan Donegan (brendan-donegan) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910894 Title: linux: 3.0.0-15.25 -proposed tracker To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/910894/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886931] Re: Oneiric is a regression due to dysfunctional quality assurance
Alex, we all agree that he makes some valid points - but it's not like people don't realise these problems exist and are ignoring them. Certainly from my point of view Oneiric was better quality than Natty (though this was largely down to less churn rather than better quality processes). Hadmut, It would be more useful to raise a specific bug about the commercial software (you haven't mentioned which software it is) and if you have concerns about the quality processes then try addressing the ubuntu-qa mailing list for example. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886931 Title: Oneiric is a regression due to dysfunctional quality assurance To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886931] Re: Oneiric is a regression due to dysfunctional quality assurance
For the record, the reason this bug report is invalid is not because I think you're wrong, but because it's not a bug. A bug is an issue that can be fixed. Making a catch all statement like 'the QA is dysfunctional' doesn't help anyone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886931 Title: Oneiric is a regression due to dysfunctional quality assurance To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/886931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 912522] Re: usb_test fails on non-writable filesystems
We want to check the USB subsystem is working properly. Just mounting a partition is not really good enough (would you test Wifi by just checking that it pairs with an access point?). I would suggest that we should try to write to every partition which is writable, and just ignore the ones that aren't. If no partitions are writable then maybe we need to fail the test (not enough info?) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912522 Title: usb_test fails on non-writable filesystems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/checkbox/+bug/912522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 907377] Re: HP ProLiant DL360 G6 has debootstrap errors during install of Precise Alpha 1
This is still present in the latest dailies, same error. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907377 Title: HP ProLiant DL360 G6 has debootstrap errors during install of Precise Alpha 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/907377/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 907454] Re: [Dell Precision M4500] offlining and then re-onlining CPUs makes the system unresponsive
Daniel (or mtvoid) The Oneiric kernel had a patch reverted and was updated to 3.0.0-15.25; I'm not sure if the two issues are related but it might be worth testing again just to make sure the problem is still there. Thanks, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907454 Title: [Dell Precision M4500] offlining and then re-onlining CPUs makes the system unresponsive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/907454/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 907377] Re: HP ProLiant DL360 G6 has debootstrap errors during install of Precise Alpha 1
Joe, If the problem is with the kernel in the installer, how am I supposed to test with the upstream kernel? Maybe there is a way, but I could do with some pointers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907377 Title: HP ProLiant DL360 G6 has debootstrap errors during install of Precise Alpha 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/907377/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 908075] Re: SSO client complains 'There was a problem retrieving the credentials'
** Description changed: Steps to reproduce: 1.) Select 'Ubuntu One' from the launcher 2.) Click on 'I already have an account link' 3.) Enter a valid username and password and click 'Connect' Expected result: Ubuntu One reaches the 'logged in' state Actual result: Red letters stating 'There was a problem retrieving the credentials' - appear above the 'Learn more' + appear above the 'Learn more' button ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubuntu-sso-client 2.99.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-6.12-generic-pae 3.2.0-rc6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-6-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Dec 23 10:13:05 2011 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (20111222) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: - LANGUAGE=en_GB:en - PATH=(custom, no user) - LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANGUAGE=en_GB:en + PATH=(custom, no user) + LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubuntu-sso-client UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908075 Title: SSO client complains 'There was a problem retrieving the credentials' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-sso-client/+bug/908075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 908075] [NEW] SSO client complains 'There was a problem retrieving the credentials'
Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: 1.) Select 'Ubuntu One' from the launcher 2.) Click on 'I already have an account link' 3.) Enter a valid username and password and click 'Connect' Expected result: Ubuntu One reaches the 'logged in' state Actual result: Red letters stating 'There was a problem retrieving the credentials' appear above the 'Learn more' ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubuntu-sso-client 2.99.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-6.12-generic-pae 3.2.0-rc6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-6-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Dec 23 10:13:05 2011 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (20111222) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubuntu-sso-client UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubuntu-sso-client (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908075 Title: SSO client complains 'There was a problem retrieving the credentials' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-sso-client/+bug/908075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 908075] Re: SSO client complains 'There was a problem retrieving the credentials'
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908075 Title: SSO client complains 'There was a problem retrieving the credentials' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-sso-client/+bug/908075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
