[Bug 528432] Re: [gm45] X crashes and restarts with *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 4 of 17
another workaround (really ugly) is to deactivate images in firefox... but as you can imagine, it's not a solution. -- [gm45] X crashes and restarts with *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 4 of 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675443] Re: package oss4-dkms 4.2-build2002-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
-- package oss4-dkms 4.2-build2002-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 675443] [NEW] package oss4-dkms 4.2-build2002-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
Public bug reported: lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 Codename: lucid iF oss4-dkms 4.2-build2002-2 Open Sound System - DKMS module sources ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: oss4-dkms 4.2-build2002-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic-pae 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Nov 15 10:14:39 2010 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: oss4 Title: package oss4-dkms 4.2-build2002-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 ** Affects: oss4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- package oss4-dkms 4.2-build2002-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528432] Re: [gm45] X crashes and restarts with *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 4 of 17
Any news in here ? -- [gm45] X crashes and restarts with *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 4 of 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528432] Re: [gm45] X crashes and restarts with *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 4 of 17
errm according to what Chris Wilson answered me on freedesktop, this bug was corrected about one year ago : """ This bug has been fixed for over a year. Please do try testing upstream packages before filing a bug against upstream. """ (source: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31520#c1) What's the status of this driver in ubuntu ? are you sync with upstream ? ** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel via http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31520 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [gm45] X crashes and restarts with *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 4 of 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528432] Re: [gm45] X crashes and restarts with *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 4 of 17
Bug opened @freedesktop (didn't find any opened bug related to this error) : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31520 ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #31520 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31520 -- [gm45] X crashes and restarts with *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 4 of 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528432] Re: [gm45] X crashes and restarts with *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 4 of 17
(maybe related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg- server/+bug/611619 ? ) -- [gm45] X crashes and restarts with *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 4 of 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 611619] Re: Xorg crash when viewing a large PNG file in firefox
Maybe related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg- video-intel/+bug/528432 -- Xorg crash when viewing a large PNG file in firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528432] Re: [gm45] X crashes and restarts with *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 4 of 17
Maybe it's a driver bug - should be reported to Intel ? -- [gm45] X crashes and restarts with *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 4 of 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 611619] Re: Xorg crash when viewing a large PNG file in firefox
Hello, We have three computers here having this problem. They all are: (dmidecode) System Information Manufacturer: LENOVO Product Name: 3269A7G Version: ThinkCentre M90p Serial Number: x UUID: lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 Codename: lucid uname -a Linux xxx 2.6.32-25-generic-pae #45-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 21:01:33 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux (lspci -vvv -s 00:02.0) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) Subsystem: Lenovo Device 3059 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- Kernel driver in use: i915 Kernel modules: i915 dpkg -l | grep intel ii intel-gpu-tools 1.0.2+git20100324-0ubuntu1 tools for debugging the Intel graphics driver ii libdrm-intel1 2.4.18-1ubuntu3 Userspace interface to intel-specific kernel DRM services -- run ii whois 5.0.0ubuntu3 an intelligent whois client ii xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.1-3ubuntu5 X.Org X server -- Intel i8xx, i9xx display driver dmesg | grep -i drm [0.00] Linux version 2.6.32-25-generic-pae (bui...@palmer) (gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) ) #45-Ubuntu SMP Sat Oct 16 21:01:33 UTC 2010 (Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic-pae 2.6.32.21+drm33.7) [ 15.248561] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [ 15.291729] [drm] MTRR allocation failed. Graphics performance may suffer. [ 15.291774] [drm] set up 127M of stolen space [ 15.588276] fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device [ 15.588318] [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for :00:02.0 on minor 0 What happens: When we open any huge image (either jpeg, png) in Firefox, X crashes. The only lines we have in dmesg are: [drm:i915_gem_do_execbuffer] *ERROR* Failed to pin buffer 1 of 2, total 93585408 bytes: -28 [drm:i915_gem_do_execbuffer] *ERROR* 932 objects [6 pinned], 262848512 object bytes [23990272 pinned], 23990272/134217728 gtt bytes There's no other message before nor after those lines. After that, X recovers, and we're on the login screen. This bug can be reproduced on our workstations. Maybe it's a i686 bug - we cannot check that, we only have i686 computers here. Any input would be great. Thank you! C. -- Xorg crash when viewing a large PNG file in firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 641247] [NEW] package oss4-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: oss4 kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: I tried to install oss4, doing this : apt-get install oss4-base oss4-dkms oss4-gtk but unfortunately, it crashes at oss4-dkms - seems that we just cannot compile any module against this kernel (2.6.32-24-generic-pae) which is a pitty. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: oss4-dkms (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.42-generic-pae 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 DKMSBuildLog: DKMS make.log for oss4-4.2-build2002 for kernel 2.6.32-24-generic-pae (i686) Fri Sep 17 14:11:07 CEST 2010 Date: Fri Sep 17 14:11:10 2010 ErrorMessage: oss4 kernel module failed to build InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100429) PackageVersion: 4.2-build2002-2 SourcePackage: oss4 Title: package oss4-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: oss4 kernel module failed to build ** Affects: oss4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- package oss4-dkms (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: oss4 kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641247 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 488740] Re: gpsdrive-scripts : version for gpsfetchmap
no news in here ? -- gpsdrive-scripts : version for gpsfetchmap https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490310] [NEW] tangogps version - depcrecated in karmik and jaunty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tangogps Hello, I just stumbled on tangogps package in karmik (and jaunty), and it seems its version is deprecated; after having a look on official website, I saw that they rewrote all its interface so that it's really nice to use on small devices (such as tablet pc and so on). Do you think an update will be possible, at least on karmik? Thanks in advance. Best regards, C. System informations : Description: Ubuntu Karmic (developpment branch) release: 9.10 tangogps version: 0.9.6-5 Expected : 0.99.1 (tested on other linux distro, working really fine, no bug and even faster) ** Affects: tangogps (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tangogps version - depcrecated in karmik and jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490310 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 488740] [NEW] gpsdrive-scripts : version for gpsfetchmap
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gpsdrive-scripts Hello, I'm currently using gpsfetchmap script (provided by gpsdrive-scripts package), and saw that it's really out of date. A patch, done in january 2008, adds support for OSM maps, and it seems that ubuntu jaunty's version doesn't use this version, but an older one. System informations : Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 Package version: gpsdrive-scripts 2.10~pre4-6.dfsg-1ubuntu1 Should use pre7 version. For information, copying script directly from soruces doesn't break anything, so maybe you can just change script in package without doing anything else (but consider upgrading all versions... ) Best regards, C. ** Affects: gpsdrive (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gpsdrive-scripts : version for gpsfetchmap https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 488740] Re: gpsdrive-scripts : version for gpsfetchmap
Attached : diff for gpsfetchmap (diff -U1 old_gpsfetchmap gpsfetchmap) ** Attachment added: "gpsfetchmap diff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36110753/gpsfetchmap.diff -- gpsdrive-scripts : version for gpsfetchmap https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488740 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226484] Re: boot from manually constructed raid1 root fails because of missing hostname in initramfs
for your information : grub-install /dev/md0 just crashed my installation.. seems it's really NOT a good idea. server keeps on doing bios -> loading grub -> bios -> -- boot from manually constructed raid1 root fails because of missing hostname in initramfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397308] Re: jaunty 32b cannot see more than 3023M RAM
well, ok so workstations aren't supposed to have more than 3G of ram ? I just don't see the point. -server works, but that's... stupide. -- jaunty 32b cannot see more than 3023M RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397308] Re: jaunty 32b cannot see more than 3023M RAM
BTW, while reading /boot/config-2.6.28-13-generic, here's the options to change : ACTUAL: CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set SHOULD BE # CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G is not set CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y Regards, C. -- jaunty 32b cannot see more than 3023M RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397308] [NEW] jaunty 32b cannot see more than 3023M RAM
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-generic Hi, It seems that Jaunty cannot see all the RAM in my laptop (installed : 4G, seen : 3023M). Using another Linux, also 32B, I had to activate some options in the kernel: High Memory Support (64G) in Processor Type and features as I use a lot of KVM, VMWare and VirtualBox, I really need my system to see all my installed ram. And I can't be in 64B, as my office install all our computers in 32b One smart thing : when searching package name while filling this bug, I saw a package named "linux-image-generic-pae" but apt-cache search linux-image-generic-pae doesn't match anything... that's a pitty... Informations : Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 dpkg -l | grep linux-image ii linux-image-2.6.28-13-generic 2.6.28-13.45 ii linux-image-generic2.6.28.13.17 uname -r 2.6.28-13-generic Thanks in advance Regards, C. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- jaunty 32b cannot see more than 3023M RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201786] Re: ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines
Hi again, Searching some informations on seahorse' ssh-agent, I found this thing: """/!\ Note: This only applies to versions of Seahorse prior to 2.22. In 2.22 and later a full SSH agent is included in gnome-keyring and the agent proxy in Seahorse has been retired. """ maybe there are some problems with versions of those programmes in ubuntu? See source: http://live.gnome.org/Seahorse/SSHAgent Regards, C. -- ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201786] Re: ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines
Hello. Same problem on a recently reinstalled Jaunty. Informations : Architecture : i386 Release : 9.04 Packages version: dpkg -l | grep seahorse ii libcryptui02.26.1-0ubuntu1 ii seahorse 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 ii seahorse-plugins 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 System is up to date. One thing though : we kept user's home when we reinstalled his computer. BUT we removed all his preferences : for dir in .gconf .gconfd .gnome .gnome2 .gnome2_private .local .config do rm -r $HOME/$dir done When we do a "ssh-add", it works again. I tried to do Christian Albrecht fix, but it didn't work on this computer. -- ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 279193] Re: Unable to upload files from GVFS sources
Hello, I just tested with epiphany : epiphany-browser 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 Intuitive web browser - dummy package epiphany-browser-data 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 Data files for the GNOME web browser epiphany-extensions2.26.0-0ubuntu2 Extensions for Epiphany web browser epiphany-gecko 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 Intuitive GNOME web browser - Gecko version and it has the same behavior : cannot access mounted network share (in my case, a samba share, with ldap authentication if it can change something). Passing through ~/.gvfs works, like on firefox. Using Konqueror is worth, as it doesn't load ~/.gtk-bookmarks [well, worth, not really, it's a KDE/QT app, so it just don't know about this file], and it doesn't show up gvfs share (also "logic", as gvfs is pure Gnome stuff) Hope this will help. Regards, C. Jeanneret -- Unable to upload files from GVFS sources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279193 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373111] Re: Keyboard 'Custom Shortcut' does not retain environment
opened upstream : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582436 and linked to this one. ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #582436 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582436 -- Keyboard 'Custom Shortcut' does not retain environment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373111 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373111] Re: Keyboard 'Custom Shortcut' does not retain environment
Hello, I discovered this one a bit later after I opened the bug. Fact is, when we use another launcher than the default one (which has no tab completion...) like gmrun, environment isn't kept as well... so it's not only for "custom shortcuts", and maybe it's the same problem source (gnome-setting-manager). Thanks for your answers. Should I post it on bugs.gnome.org ? Regards, C. -- Keyboard 'Custom Shortcut' does not retain environment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373111 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373111] Re: keyboard shortcup and shell
I see something interesting : "env" command outputs some nice thing, especially : [gnome-terminal launched through menu] GNOME_KEYRING_SOCKET=/tmp/keyring-mNji2A/socket SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/keyring-mNji2A/socket.ssh [gnome-terminal launched through gmrun] GNOME_KEYRING_SOCKET=/tmp/keyring-mNji2A/socket SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/ssh-gvpqNC5125/agent.5125 shouldn't SSH_AUTH_SOCK be the same ?! When launching a second terminal through the menu, it shows me that it's using the same agent [that's logical...] so, question is : why is it using a second, unknown agent when it's launched through another mean ?? -- keyboard shortcup and shell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373111 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 375339] [NEW] thunderbird gvfs
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Hi, It seems that thunderbird doesn't use GVFS. Indeed, when i'd like to attach a file from a samba share, mounted locally through nautilus/gvfs, dialog doesn't show me network mounts... Same behavior when I'd like to save an attachment to my samba share. My workaround is to create a link in my .gtk-bookmarks : "file:///home/user/.gvfs Fileserver alternative" Informations : lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 Codename: jaunty dpkg -l | grep gvfs 402:ii gvfs 1.2.2-0ubuntu1 403:ii gvfs-backends 1.2.2-0ubuntu1 404:ii gvfs-bin 1.2.2-0ubuntu1 405:ii gvfs-fuse 1.2.2-0ubuntu1 865:ii libgvfscommon0 1.2.2-0ubuntu1 dpkg -l | grep thunderbird 1716:ii thunderbird 2.0.0.21+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.9.04.1 1717:ii thunderbird-gnome-support 2.0.0.21+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.9.04.1 1718:ii thunderbird-locale-de 1:2.0.0.14+1-0ubuntu2 1719:ii thunderbird-locale-en-gb 1:2.0.0.14+1-0ubuntu2 1720:ii thunderbird-locale-fr 1:2.0.0.14+1-0ubuntu2 Regards, C. ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- thunderbird gvfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 375336] [NEW] firefox gvfs
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Hi, It seems that firefox doesn't use GVFS: when I'd like to upload a file from a samba server, locally mounted through nautilus/gvfs, opened dialog doesn't show me my network mounts I have to do: ctrl+h, go into ~/.gvfs/ to select my file and upload it. Same behavior while downloading it (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/231221 ) Informations : lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 Codename: jaunty dpkg -l | grep firefox 252:ii firefox 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 253:ii firefox-3.0 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 254:ii firefox-3.0-branding 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 255:ii firefox-3.0-gnome-support 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 256:ii firefox-gnome-support 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 dpkg -l | grep gvfs 402:ii gvfs 1.2.2-0ubuntu1 403:ii gvfs-backends 1.2.2-0ubuntu1 404:ii gvfs-bin 1.2.2-0ubuntu1 405:ii gvfs-fuse 1.2.2-0ubuntu1 865:ii libgvfscommon0 1.2.2-0ubuntu1 My workaround is to create a link into nautilus, like "file:///home/user/.gvfs Fileserver alternative"... Regards, C. ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- firefox gvfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 263631] Re: [xmodmap] added keys not taken
In fact ubuntu doesn't like when we want to override ITS keymap... don't know if it's a normal behaviour, in fact, but as nobody said anything in here, I guess it is... ** Changed in: xmodmap (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- [xmodmap] added keys not taken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373111] Re: keyboard shortcup and shell
I tried another thing : as, for me, gnome integrated launcher is a mess [no tab completion], I tried to use "gmrun", which is really faster, nicer and so on. But I have exactly the same behavior using gmrun or shortcuts ! NO env, NO ssh-agent [for a sysadmin work, it's well, just imagine]... that's really, really, REALLY annoying. -- keyboard shortcup and shell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373111 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247485] Re: [jaunty] Openoffice doesn't really use GVFS
Hello, indeed, it just works, now. Sometimes OOo ask for idents, when we don't touch fileserver through it for some time, but it's really not a problem. My Boss have a big smile now ;) Thanks for this update. I think we can close this bug... but I'll open two other for Firefox and Thunderbird : they have quiet the same problem. Regards, C. -- [jaunty] Openoffice doesn't really use GVFS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 257595] Re: localdef crashes on update (gutsy)
I guess this one can be closed, as gutsy is deprecated... ** Changed in: language-support-fr (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- localdef crashes on update (gutsy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257595 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373561] [NEW] [Jaunty] awesome version is REALLY deprecated
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: awesome Hello, Is it possible to have an up-to-date version for awesome ? as 2.3 is... well... it's unusable, and deprecated. Now they have 3.2, and this one is really stable... As source-compilation isn't really how ubuntu intends to install package, I think it can be a good idea to put awesome-3.2 in APT... Regards, C. ** Affects: awesome (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Jaunty] awesome version is REALLY deprecated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373561 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 373111] [NEW] keyboard shortcup and shell
Public bug reported: Hello, I discover a nice thing in Jaunty : when we launch a shell from a keyboard shortcut (system -> preferences -> keyboard shortcut -> add), I don't have my environment, for example : - no ssh agent - I'm not in my home, but in / When I launch the same terminal from "run application" (std shortcut "alt+F2"), it's working nice. When I launch the same terminal from some icon in my pannel, it's working fine too. I tried with those terminals : - gnome-terminal - xterm - urxvtc - urxvt Same behaviour for all of them. System informations : Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 ii gnome-terminal 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 ii rxvt-unicode 9.06-1 ii xterm 241-1ubuntu1 Any idea ? Thanks. C. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- keyboard shortcup and shell https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373111 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247485] Re: [jaunty] Openoffice doesn't really use GVFS
Ok, thanks. For now we're using Intrepid, and this problem is still here... we'll try with jaunty when it's released [in some weeks if I'm not wrong]. I'll post update here when it's tested. Regards, C. -- [jaunty] Openoffice doesn't really use GVFS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247485] Re: [jaunty] Openoffice doesn't really use GVFS
yep, indeed. Unfortunately, this mount won't appear in nautilus... so we have to use a shell to mount it (not that I care, but the other users will) -- [jaunty] Openoffice doesn't really use GVFS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 247485] Re: [jaunty] Openoffice doesn't really use GVFS
in fact, after some discussion with OOo developpers, it seems they're changing their lock system. it will be far better. still buggy for now, it should come in 3.x release. -- [jaunty] Openoffice doesn't really use GVFS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 261148] Re: oowriter doesn't behave like ooffice -writer
Hello, in fact you can't reproduce these errors if you don't have a samba share. here at work, we use a fileserver with smb sharing, and thus we have these problems. even on hardy, latest versions... Sure if you use directly your filesystem, it works really fine. Regards, C. -- oowriter doesn't behave like ooffice -writer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/261148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
