[Bug 661718] Re: Kanji Stroke Orders appears in weird, inappropriate places
** Changed in: ttf-kanjistrokeorders (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661718 Title: Kanji Stroke Orders appears in weird, inappropriate places -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652043] Re: Firefox has different tooltips from Ubuntu's default
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 534760 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534760 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 534760 firefox and openoffice tooltips are inconsistant * You can subscribe to bug 534760 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/534760/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652043 Title: Firefox has different tooltips from Ubuntu's default -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 733857] Re: The ON/OFF statuses of indicator-network's custom GtkSwitch-like widget are hard to tell apart.
** Summary changed: - The ON/OFF status of GtkSwitch elements is hard to tell apart. + The ON/OFF statuses of indicator-network's custom GtkSwitch-like widget are hard to tell apart. ** Description changed: - Binary package hint: light-themes + Binary package hint: indicator-network Just saw these on OMG!Ubuntu! - GtkSwitch inside a menu: + GtkSwitch-like widget inside a menu: http://i.imgur.com/CJL4C.jpg - GtkSwitch in an infobox of some sort. + GtkSwitch-like widget in an infobox of some sort. http://i.imgur.com/BQq2T.jpg It's hard to tell at a glance what there is OFF, and what is ON (despite the big capital letter text- hey, don't make me read! ;) ) I reckon there's one clear mistake in this styling, and a significant lack of visual cues that might be handy for telling the two states apart. The overall effect of this is to confuse people as to whether - the text means the GtkSwitch IS ON, or if it needs clicking to MAKE it - ON. + the text means the switch IS ON, or if it needs clicking to MAKE it ON. The mistake: In that second picture, the colour red is used to denote a switch that is ON. That's a terrible error- red is the colour of “No; off; not working; bad times.” Some suggestions for other cues: The off switches look just as bright, spritely and alive as the ON switches. Some effort ought to be made to make them look dormant and off-ly. - Idea 1. Dim the text a bit on GtkSwitches that are OFF. (Confusion with disablement possible?) - Idea 2. Add a colourful background to GtkSwitches that are ON. (Confusion with focussed element?) + Idea 1. Dim the text a bit on switches that are OFF. (Confusion with disablement possible?) + Idea 2. Add a colourful background to switches that are ON. (Confusion with focussed element?) To be honest, I like both ideas, but think some care would be needed to make sure that these styles avoided looking too much like the disabled or focussed states of other elements in the theme. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733857 Title: The ON/OFF statuses of indicator-network's custom GtkSwitch-like widget are hard to tell apart. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 733857] [NEW] The ON/OFF status of GtkSwitch elements is hard to tell apart.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: light-themes Just saw these on OMG!Ubuntu! GtkSwitch inside a menu: http://i.imgur.com/CJL4C.jpg GtkSwitch in an infobox of some sort. http://i.imgur.com/BQq2T.jpg It's hard to tell at a glance what there is OFF, and what is ON (despite the big capital letter text- hey, don't make me read! ;) ) I reckon there's one clear mistake in this styling, and a significant lack of visual cues that might be handy for telling the two states apart. The overall effect of this is to confuse people as to whether the text means the GtkSwitch IS ON, or if it needs clicking to MAKE it ON. The mistake: In that second picture, the colour red is used to denote a switch that is ON. That's a terrible error- red is the colour of “No; off; not working; bad times.” Some suggestions for other cues: The off switches look just as bright, spritely and alive as the ON switches. Some effort ought to be made to make them look dormant and off-ly. Idea 1. Dim the text a bit on GtkSwitches that are OFF. (Confusion with disablement possible?) Idea 2. Add a colourful background to GtkSwitches that are ON. (Confusion with focussed element?) To be honest, I like both ideas, but think some care would be needed to make sure that these styles avoided looking too much like the disabled or focussed states of other elements in the theme. ** Affects: light-themes (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733857 Title: The ON/OFF status of GtkSwitch elements is hard to tell apart. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 552920] Re: Moving diagonally from narrow menu title often opens adjacent menu
It might be worth considering (if it's even possible) only having a timer on menu opening if the mouse is actually moving diagonally. That way might keep the responsive feel when moving from menu to menu whilst stopping the reported behaviour. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552920 Title: Moving diagonally from narrow menu title often opens adjacent menu -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637827] Re: Firefox and Thunderbird (XUL) menus don't appear in the global menu bar
Updated the description to include a link to Mr. Coulson's globalmenu- extension project, since that information is relevant to anyone who is interested in this bug. ** Description changed: Firefox's and Thunderbird's menus do not appear in the Unity menu bar or Indicator Applet Appmenu. In Maverick, this work was put off until Maverick+1 on the grounds that Unity was being used only in UNE, and Firefox was not gong to be used in UNE. A Firefox extension http://gitorious.org/firefox-gnome-globalmenu /firefox-gnome-globalmenu may provide a base for the code to implement this. + + Chris Coulson is working on an extension to add support in XUL + applications for indicator-appmenu, which can be found on Launchpad + https://launchpad.net/globalmenu-extension. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637827 Title: Firefox and Thunderbird (XUL) menus don't appear in the global menu bar -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 677028] Re: Pidgin: Unable to validate certificate for omega.contacts.msn.com
@Zaphod If you're talking about the update of openssl from 0.9.8o-1ubuntu4.1 to 0.9.8o-1ubuntu4.2, I haven't installed those yet but still get the problem, so I think it's irrelevant. -- Pidgin: Unable to validate certificate for omega.contacts.msn.com https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677028 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 661718] [NEW] Kanji Stroke Orders appears in weird, inappropriate places
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ttf-kanjistrokeorders OS version: Ubuntu 10.10 Package version: ttf-kanjistrokeorders 2.014-2 When this package is installed, it appears in some funny places, such as in the Connecting text of Rhythmbox and also in the software centre. It being for such a specialised purpose, it should really only appear anywhere if directly asked for. ** Affects: ttf-kanjistrokeorders (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Kanji Stroke Orders appears in weird, inappropriate places https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661718 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 661718] Re: Kanji Stroke Orders appears in weird, inappropriate places
** Attachment added: Kanjistrokeorders is seen in the text connecting. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661718/+attachment/1696475/+files/Screenshot-3.png -- Kanji Stroke Orders appears in weird, inappropriate places https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661718 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658068] Re: Maverick installer shows no information when typed username is invalid
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 549195 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549195 Thanks for that, I've marked this bug as a duplicate of bug 549195. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 549195 Ubiquity should give visual feedback that username cannot contains capital letter(s) * You can subscribe to bug 549195 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/549195/+subscribe -- Maverick installer shows no information when typed username is invalid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658068 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 549195] Re: Ubiquity should give visual feedback that username cannot contains capital letter(s)
This bug persists even at release, and has been quite disruptive for at least a few people. I reported this earlier today in a separate bug, which I have now marked as a duplicate of this one. -- Ubiquity should give visual feedback that username cannot contains capital letter(s) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549195 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574155] Re: Software-Center does not remove deactivated ppa's
Yes. I got this problem in Ubuntu 10.10 just now, and it was mitigated by Daniel Gnoutcheff's suggested command. -- Software-Center does not remove deactivated ppa's https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574155 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658190] [NEW] Disc number cannot be changed en mass.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox Release version: Ubuntu 10.10 Package version: Rhythmbox 0.13.1-0ubuntu5 It has been the case for me that I sometimes need to change the disc number (by adding it at all, mostly) for various tracks, whether because they have lost metadata in conversion, arrived without it, or been corrupted, etc. This hasn't happened often, to be fair. Expected: I can highlight the offending tracks, right click, select properties and give them all a disc number. What happens: If you have multiple tracks selected, disc number is not present in the properties dialogue. Instead you must go through them one by one, by one, by one, by one… A minor annoyance at best. ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid -- Disc number cannot be changed en mass. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658190] Re: Disc number cannot be changed en mass.
It's right there… what the hell is wrong with my eyes? ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Disc number cannot be changed en mass. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658190 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658068] [NEW] Maverick installer shows no information when typed username is invalid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity OS Version: Ubuntu 10.10 Package version: Ubiquity 2.4.8 Scenario: The user types an invalid username into the username field whilst setting up their account during installation. Expected result: Ubiquity alerts the user that they have typed an invalid username and explains the problem which characters are valid. What occurs: Uiquity is silent on the issue, stating あなたの操作を待っている…*, when the user thinks that they have in fact done all that they can. * Waiting for your action, or some such. Additionally: In my case it was because I used my name as a username, which I naturally type with a capital C. Surely if the only issue with my suggestion was that usernames do not contain capitals, in that case it should just accept my string but convert it all to lower case? Effect of this bug: I stared at this frozen state for about half an hour, clicking back and forth, emptying and refilling fields, etc. During the course of Google searching for this problem, I found at least one person who did not stumble upon the solution, stating that they could not install Ubuntu 10.10 due to this behaviour. ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Maverick installer shows no information when typed username is invalid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658068 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658068] Re: Maverick installer shows no information when typed username is invalid
** Attachment added: The syslog and partman files requested on the bug report page. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658068/+attachment/1683532/+files/partman_and_syslog.tar.gz -- Maverick installer shows no information when typed username is invalid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658068 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 542659] Re: 2 different scrollbars in the light themes
This problem also affects the About Ubuntu dialogue in the System menu. -- 2 different scrollbars in the light themes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542659 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189329] Re: Undesirable focus while closing or minimizing
I was just about to report this very issue for Ubuntu 9.10, and have to chip in that the above is patently incorrect with compiz 1:0.8.4-0ubuntu2.1. A minimised or closed window pulls focus in order to minimise or close, and only when this is done does the window behind regain focus. The behaviour is rather weird and jarring. -- Undesirable focus while closing or minimizing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189329 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 314914] Re: [Kubuntu 9.04 Alpha 2] Slow performance with Kwin desktop effects enabled, xorg or kwin bug?
I'm on a 945GM, and after waiting some time- in case my mirror needed to catch up- and running $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg, for good measure (which changed nothing), I can happily say I've still got terrible performance with EXA. This along with that UXA/Compiz memory leak is making a pretty desktop an absolute no on Jaunty. -- [Kubuntu 9.04 Alpha 2] Slow performance with Kwin desktop effects enabled, xorg or kwin bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314914 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210241] Re: Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen
Almost certainly not, on account of the fact that on my affected Intrepid system, nspluginwrapper is not even installed. But it's fixed, and for now, that's all that matters. -- Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210241] Re: Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen
I can confirm on x86 that with a Jaunty Alpha 5 Live CD, this problem no longer persists for Flash 10. Gnome-Do, another piece of software I recently found to cause the same problem, also does not create such a window on Jaunty. Wherever this bug was living, it seems it's gone for now. -- Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251494] Re: update manager reports wrong number of updates in notification area (intrepid and hardy-proposed)
I am already running proposed, and have just obtained the update- thank you for the direction nonetheless. However, this bug was patched very quickly; I did not at any point receive conformation regarding what exactly the bug is. When would I expect to see the bug? If I know this, I will be able to confirm whether or not the bug is gone. Thank you both for addressing this issue quickly. -- update manager reports wrong number of updates in notification area (intrepid and hardy-proposed) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251494] [NEW] update manager reports wrong number of updates in notification area.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Using Ubuntu 8.04.1 and update-manager 1:0.87.29, the update manager displays a different number of updates in its title text (You can install ## updates) than the text from hovering over the notification area icon. When counted, the You can install ## updates title is correct, and the notification icon is wrong. This is utter speculation, but since there are 10 updates available in this case, and the notification icon claims 1 update available, maybe it is dropping that 0, or just taking the first number. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- update manager reports wrong number of updates in notification area. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251494] Re: update manager reports wrong number of updates in notification area.
** Attachment added: Screenshot of the update manager notification icon displaying the wrong number of updates. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16280392/10_updates.png -- update manager reports wrong number of updates in notification area. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210241] Re: Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen
Whatever this was, I believe it was an issue with flashplugin-nonfree, and at any rate, for me it is gone with the latest Flash 10 Beta (the one released on the 2nd of this month). So for now, it looks like this issue will simply disappear in the future. I shall keep an eye out. -- Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210241] Re: Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen
No sooner have I said thus, than a lier is made of me. Perhaps, now, with this Beta it is only happening for /certain/ instances of flash. Whatever is occurring, the problem is not gone as I said, at all. -- Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210241] Re: Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen
Don't wish to spam this bug, but my suspicion was very quickly confirmed; this bug doesn't appear when a wmode is set for flash. Windowless mode does sound like a good reason for there to be no window associated with Flash. Of course, Flash 9 for Linux doesn't have wmode support, which is why it happens there with every instance of Flash using Flash 9, and only some with Flash 10, and why specifically that Beta is the one where the behaviour changes (wmode was only just introduced for Linux in that Beta). For what it's worth, try this page on for size, with Flash 10, to see the behaviour: http://www.communitymx.com/content/source/E5141/wmodetrans.htm -- Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210241] Re: Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen
I disabled everything that it was possible to disable via this dialogue, on all of its tabs, and ran firefox. Obviously, no flash was displayed. I then enabled only flashplugin-nonfree, by clicking enable on the Shockwave Flash option, and loaded a flash video. The tiny window appeared. -- Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210241] Re: Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen
Whether in a Gnome or Openbox session, using Firefox or Epiphany, compositing or no compositing, this window appears when flash is encountered using the flashplugin-nonfree. Gnash doesn't produce this odd little window. -- Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210241] Re: Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen
Each time a flash video is encountered, the shadow that compiz draws around this window gets darker and darker. While I cannot be sure, I can only assume this means that each time a flash video is encountered another tiny window is created. This window is more than aesthetically irritating, as it eliminates the association of my top-left corner to the Applications menu. -- Tiny firefox window at top-left of screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
