[Bug 1852183]
I certainly ignore many things. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852183 Title: [X11] copy/paste (clipboard) with LibreOffice is broken in Ubuntu 19.10 & 20.04 (see comment 93 and 176) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1852183/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1852183]
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #29) > (In reply to larrybradley from comment #25) > > Interesting attitude. If you buy a Toyota and the engine goes bad, do you > > expect Toyota to say, "Sorry, not our problem, they sold us bad engines." > Interesting approach. I hate car allegories, but the broken part is not even > part of the car. So if the bridge you want to ride over is broken you go to > the car manufacturer and tell him to make your car fly. > > > Your name is on the product. The product is broken. > No, the clipboard manager clipboard manager of the compositor of your window > manager of your > operating system is broken. That's why there is the Mutter bug linked and > this bug here is flagged as notourbug. > > Additional findings from the linked Mutter bug are that the problem seems to > be (also) related to the Clipboard Indicator GNOME Shell Extension, see > already comment 7 here, so you may want to remove that. I may be nave or ignorant, you guess, but 20some programs running on Gnome daily work just fine. so my guess is that they programmed their applications for Gnome and it works. Why LO be an exception?. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852183 Title: [X11] copy/paste (clipboard) with LibreOffice is broken in Ubuntu 19.10 & 20.04 (see comment 93 and 176) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1852183/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1852183]
"Workaround: login to a Wayland session instead of X11 (or maybe X-Wayland?) session." Wayland is not suppoeted by Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. Probably neither in eny Debian based Linux. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852183 Title: [X11] copy/paste (clipboard) with LibreOffice is broken in Ubuntu 19.10 & 20.04 (see comment 93) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1852183/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1852183]
Occurs in LO 7.0.0-Alpha too Linux+GNOME -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852183 Title: [X11] copy/paste (clipboard) with LibreOffice is broken in Ubuntu 19.10 & 20.04 (see comment 93) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1852183/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1852183]
All reports suggest that the bug occurs under Linux+GNOME, yet all other Linux+GNOME applications do mouse copy/pastes OK. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852183 Title: [X11] copy/paste (clipboard) with LibreOffice is broken in Ubuntu 19.10 & 20.04 (see comment 93) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1852183/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 42178] Re: synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold
I am not sure its the same bug, but using Ubuntu 8.10 suddenly synaptic stopped working. If you click on the icon it requires sudoers password, and then nothing happens. If you try to run it from terminal it starts if you run it without administrative privileges. but sudo synaptic pails with this message: sudo synaptic [sudo] password for csevcik: Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 keyUnable to init server: Could not connect: Connection refused (synaptic:4058): Gtk-WARNING **: 09:57:26.552: cannot open display: :0 Re installing synaptic does not help solving the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42178 Title: synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/synaptic/+bug/42178/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1767523] Re: Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't install from 18.04 pendrive
Yes, somebody must do something. It is a horrible mess that made my waste 3 or 4 days to find a way. Carlos Sevcik, MD PhD Professor CEO, Scientific & Medical Data Analysis (SciMeDAn). Barcelona, Spain Web: www.scimedan.com carlos.sevci...@gmail.com Phone: +34 930 15 16 34 Mobile: +34 697 66 84 02 On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:10 AM, dino99 <1767...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > What a user's case; thanks for all these explanation/steps. > > There are so many reports about Efi-Gpt-Mvme with actual hardware configs; > what a mess. > see lp:1767703 > > Maybe its time to redesign that installer, with a more detailed > partition option explanations. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767523 > > Title: > Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't > install from 18.04 pendrive > > Status in grub-installer package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > LENOVO with uefi installation fails due to inability to write boot > loader. Ubuntu MATE 17.10 worked OK but update to 18.04 failed due to > Xwinows configurtion. It was possible to login using Control-Alt-F1 > but xinit or startx gave errors and failed. > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 > Package: ubiquity 18.04.14 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-20.21-generic 4.15.17 > Uname: Linux 4.15.0-20-generic x86_64 > ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7 > Architecture: amd64 > CasperVersion: 1.394 > Date: Sat Apr 28 00:42:29 2018 > InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu-mate.seed boot=casper > initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash --- maybe-ubiquity > LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-MATE 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 > (20180426) > ProcEnviron: >LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 >PATH=(custom, no user) >XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= >LANG=en_US.UTF-8 >LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8 > SourcePackage: grub-installer > UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/ > +bug/1767523/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767523 Title: Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't install from 18.04 pendrive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1767523/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767523] Re: Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't install from 18.04 pendrive
Even my previous tips produced a buggy result I finally got UM 18.04 working as follows. 1-Clean install 17.10 with a wipe everything option (Phony enough this did erase my previous / and /home ext4 partitions). Let it install the / partition in 14 GB /dev/nvme0n1p1 ext4. Let the installation finish undisturbed. 2-Reboot the machine with the UM 17.04 installer. And choose "Do something else". Define a new / and /home partitions if, as it was my case, tour old / exists as the installation to format the partition ext4 (100 GB ext4 in my case) and IGNORE COMPLETELY /dev/nvme0n1p1 DO NOT MODIFY IT IN ANY WAY. If your old /home partition exists (900 Gb in my case) use it as ext4 (or whatever is your partition format) AND DO NOT FORMAT IT IF YOU WANT TO PRESERVE YOUR DATA. Let the re-installation finish undisturbed. DO NOT INSTALL THE NVIDIA PROPRIETARY DRIVES at this stage. Fully update UM 17.10 from the repositories. 3- You should get a notice that a new UM exists, this is UM 18.04, follow the automatic procedure to update 17.10 to 18.04 from Ubuntu Internet repositories, when this finishes, reboot to UM 18.04. My system now runs fine except for an error at login indicating that a notification area in the panel crashed, I restart it as suggested and then things are OK. I cannot lock my account though, it locks and unlocks fine if I leave the system undisturbed for some 10 min and then come back to use the machine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767523 Title: Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't install from 18.04 pendrive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1767523/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767523] Re: Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't install from 18.04 pendrive
I finally managed to install Ubuntu MATE 18.04 on my Lenovo All In One 520-277KL. But it was very bumpy (I am using Ubuntu since 2006), here is my full story. 1-UM 17.10 installed after disabling UEFI in the bios and asked to wipe out the disk and install letting UM 17.10 do its default instalation. Later I repartitioned the disk to set a root partition (~100GB) and a home partition (~900 GB). 2-Upgrading UM 17.10 to 18.04 resulted in inability to enter into my account except using Ctl-Alt-F1. I tried fixing files in /etc/X11 with no success. This led me to reinstall UM 18.04 from scratch following a wipe disk and install (option 1 in the install menu). Here I probably took the wrong decision, because and identical situation appeared later at some point after installing UM 18.04 and it was solved by removing the Nvidia configuration files from my account and erasing .Xauthority and .xinputrc and rebooting my machine afterwards. I had to reinstall the Nvidia drives afterwards. 3-The UM 18.04 installation from scratch wiping the disk and doing the default installation seem to work, but created a 14 GB /dev/nvme0n1p1 in addition to the /dev/nvme0n1 where it installed the boot loader. It also created to additional partitions of ~100 GB and ~800 GB. The problem was that /dev/nvme0n1p1 was formated ext4 and set as root (/) including a /home partition inside. Of course /dev/nvme0n1p1 was left out of space almost immediately after I started installing software and before I realized the mess. The disk had a 14 GB /dev/nvme0n1, 14 GB /dev/nvme0n1p1 ext4, 512 MB /dev/sda1 with format labeled unknown, 108 GB /dev/sda2 ext4 and 823.1 GB /dev/sda3 ext4. 4- I decided once again to reinstall the system with option "do something else" and ignored /dev/nvme0n1p1, set /dev/sda2 as / (root) and /dev/sda3 as /home (both formated to ext4). Reinstalled the system, since at some point of my previous buggy trials I could not log in into my account using my password, in the final installation I created my account allowing to enter directly (without asking for a password) into my account. Finally I got a working system, although there is constant error message at entering into my account indicating that an icon in the panel closed unexpectedly, icon which I always have to restart. The final bug is that doing all the tricks (User administration menu, editing /etc/group to remove the no password login group) I cannot get the startup login to ask for a password, it always goes straight into my account, if I log out, the subsequent logins ask for a password as they should. In the users and groups administration menu the use password to login appears as active, but has no effect. Boy, I like Ubuntu but such a buggy release is unacceptable. I hope all this details help to fix the mess. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767523 Title: Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't install from 18.04 pendrive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1767523/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767523] [NEW] Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't install from 18.04 pendrive
Public bug reported: LENOVO with uefi installation fails due to inability to write boot loader. Ubuntu MATE 17.10 worked OK but update to 18.04 failed due to Xwinows configurtion. It was possible to login using Control-Alt-F1 but xinit or startx gave errors and failed. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: ubiquity 18.04.14 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-20.21-generic 4.15.17 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.394 Date: Sat Apr 28 00:42:29 2018 InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu-mate.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash --- maybe-ubiquity LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-MATE 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8 SourcePackage: grub-installer UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic ubiquity-18.04.14 ubuntu-mate -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767523 Title: Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't install from 18.04 pendrive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1767523/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1640171] Re: Molecules are not rendered, black screen
Same problem with Ubuntu 17.04, it renders Avogadro useless -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640171 Title: Molecules are not rendered, black screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/avogadro/+bug/1640171/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1646275] [NEW] package cinnamon 3.0.7-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/cinnamon/js/misc/config.js', which is also in package cinnamon-common 3.0.7-1~xenial0
Public bug reported: Error upgrading Ubuntu 16.10 when upgrading cinnamon ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10 Package: cinnamon 3.0.7-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-27.29-generic 4.8.1 Uname: Linux 4.8.0-27-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Nov 24 07:37:46 2016 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/cinnamon/js/misc/config.js', which is also in package cinnamon-common 3.0.7-1~xenial0 InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-06-03 (180 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160420.1) RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.10ubuntu1 apt 1.3.1 SourcePackage: cinnamon Title: package cinnamon 3.0.7-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/cinnamon/js/misc/config.js', which is also in package cinnamon-common 3.0.7-1~xenial0 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to yakkety on 2016-11-23 (6 days ago) ** Affects: cinnamon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package third-party-packages yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646275 Title: package cinnamon 3.0.7-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/cinnamon/js/misc/config.js', which is also in package cinnamon-common 3.0.7-1~xenial0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1646275/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1532226] Re: No menu bar in gtk apps on fresh boot
"Same problem in Ubuntu 16.04, the weird thing is than in my Workstation this bug is present but not in my laptop." I fully confirm this, only in my workstation, not in any of my 2 ultrabooks or my laptop. It happened after upgrading from 15.10 to 16.04. The applications I notice without menus either on the window or the toolbar are nautilus and gedid. Its a pain in the neck! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532226 Title: No menu bar in gtk apps on fresh boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/1532226/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1309645] [NEW] blcr-dkms 0.8.5-2.1: blcr kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: After updating to 14,04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.5-2.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-24-generic Date: Fri Apr 18 04:24:35 2014 DuplicateSignature: dkms:blcr-dkms:0.8.5-2.1:configure: error: Kernel source is configured uni-processor but the kernel symbol table is SMP. Consider specifying a symbol table with --with-system-map or --with-vmlinux. Or, if using kernel sources that are configured by /boot/kernel.h, you may try --with-kernel-type=SMP to force an SMP interpretation of the sources. InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-08-31 (230 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release amd64 (20130424) PackageArchitecture: all PackageVersion: 0.8.5-2.1 SourcePackage: blcr Title: blcr-dkms 0.8.5-2.1: blcr kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-18 (0 days ago) ** Affects: blcr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1309645 Title: blcr-dkms 0.8.5-2.1: blcr kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/1309645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1006667] [NEW] Ubuntu 12.4 instalation crashed
Public bug reported: Instalation crashed ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubiquity 2.10.16 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.315 Date: Wed May 30 20:07:52 2012 InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed boot=casper initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash -- maybe-ubiquity LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120425) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 TERM=linux PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SourcePackage: ubiquity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise ubiquity-2.10.16 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006667 Title: Ubuntu 12.4 instalation crashed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1006667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1006667] Re: Ubuntu 12.4 instalation crashed
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006667 Title: Ubuntu 12.4 instalation crashed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1006667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993674] [NEW] Javascript falsely reported as blocked in Firefox
Public bug reported:
An extremely important site for my work, the NCBI Protein Data Bank
stores crystal structure of proteins which used to be easily
downloadable. Not now, the site reports Firefox 12 as not compatible
indicating that javascripts are blocked. The site is:
http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/browser/browsercheck.do
According to Firefox preferences Javascripts are enabled. The NCBI PDB
site advices to install an Oracle Java plugin in Firefox, but this does
not solve the problem; furthermore if the Oracle plugin is installed
Firefox becomes unstable, and still does not work with the NCBI PDB
site.
The problem is extremely critical to me and I believe to many other
scientists.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: firefox 12.0+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic-pae 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae i686
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24.
AplayDevices:
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC269 Analog [ALC269 Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: i386
ArecordDevices:
List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC269 Analog [ALC269 Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: csevcik1689 F pulseaudio
BuildID: 20120423122624
Card0.Amixer.info:
Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf7db8000 irq 44'
Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC269'
Components : 'HDA:10ec0269,104383ce,0014'
Controls : 17
Simple ctrls : 9
Channel: release
Date: Wed May 2 21:21:02 2012
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IfupdownConfig:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
IncompatibleExtensions: FlashGot - ID={19503e42-ca3c-4c27-b1e2-9cdb2170ee34},
Version=1.4.3, minVersion=1.9a3, maxVersion=1.9.*, Location=app-profile,
Type=extension, Active=Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta i386 (20120328)
IpRoute:
default via 192.168.2.1 dev wlan0 proto static
169.254.0.0/16 dev wlan0 scope link metric 1000
192.168.2.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.4 metric 2
ProcEnviron:
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=12.0/20120423122624 (Running)
RunningIncompatibleAddons: True
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 10/16/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 1102
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: 1005HA
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: x.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 0x
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.chassis.version: x.x
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1102:bd10/16/2009:svnASUSTeKComputerINC.:pn1005HA:pvrx.x:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rn1005HA:rvrx.xx:cvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:ct10:cvrx.x:
dmi.product.name: 1005HA
dmi.product.version: x.x
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise release-channel
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993674
Title:
Javascript falsely reported as blocked in Firefox
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/993674/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993674] Re: Javascript falsely reported as blocked in Firefox
** Description changed:
- An extremely important site for my work, the NCBI Protein Data Bank it
- stores crystal structure of proteins which use to be easily
+ An extremely important site for my work, the NCBI Protein Data Bank
+ stores crystal structure of proteins which used to be easily
downloadable. Not now, the site reports Firefox 12 as not compatible
- indicating that javascripts are blocked the site is:
+ indicating that javascripts are blocked. The site is:
http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/browser/browsercheck.do
-
- Acording to Firefox preferences it is enabled. The NCBI PDB site advices to
install an Oracle Java plugin in Firefox, but this does not solve the problem;
furthermore if the Oracle plugin is installed Firefox becomes unstable, and
still does not work with the NCBI PDB site.
+ According to Firefox preferences Javascripts are enabled. The NCBI PDB
+ site advices to install an Oracle Java plugin in Firefox, but this does
+ not solve the problem; furthermore if the Oracle plugin is installed
+ Firefox becomes unstable, and still does not work with the NCBI PDB
+ site.
The problem is extremely critical to me and I believe to many other
scientists.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: firefox 12.0+build1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic-pae 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae i686
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24.
AplayDevices:
- List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
- card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC269 Analog [ALC269 Analog]
-Subdevices: 1/1
-Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
+ List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
+ card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC269 Analog [ALC269 Analog]
+ Subdevices: 1/1
+ Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: i386
ArecordDevices:
- List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
- card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC269 Analog [ALC269 Analog]
-Subdevices: 1/1
-Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
+ List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices
+ card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC269 Analog [ALC269 Analog]
+ Subdevices: 1/1
+ Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
- USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
- /dev/snd/controlC0: csevcik1689 F pulseaudio
+ USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
+ /dev/snd/controlC0: csevcik1689 F pulseaudio
BuildID: 20120423122624
Card0.Amixer.info:
- Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf7db8000 irq 44'
-Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC269'
-Components : 'HDA:10ec0269,104383ce,0014'
-Controls : 17
-Simple ctrls : 9
+ Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf7db8000 irq 44'
+ Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC269'
+ Components : 'HDA:10ec0269,104383ce,0014'
+ Controls : 17
+ Simple ctrls : 9
Channel: release
Date: Wed May 2 21:21:02 2012
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IfupdownConfig:
- auto lo
- iface lo inet loopback
+ auto lo
+ iface lo inet loopback
IncompatibleExtensions: FlashGot - ID={19503e42-ca3c-4c27-b1e2-9cdb2170ee34},
Version=1.4.3, minVersion=1.9a3, maxVersion=1.9.*, Location=app-profile,
Type=extension, Active=Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta i386 (20120328)
IpRoute:
- default via 192.168.2.1 dev wlan0 proto static
- 169.254.0.0/16 dev wlan0 scope link metric 1000
- 192.168.2.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.4 metric 2
+ default via 192.168.2.1 dev wlan0 proto static
+ 169.254.0.0/16 dev wlan0 scope link metric 1000
+ 192.168.2.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.4 metric 2
ProcEnviron:
- PATH=(custom, user)
- LANG=en_US.UTF-8
- SHELL=/bin/bash
+ PATH=(custom, user)
+ LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+ SHELL=/bin/bash
Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=12.0/20120423122624 (Running)
RunningIncompatibleAddons: True
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 10/16/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 1102
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: 1005HA
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: x.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: 0x
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.chassis.version: x.x
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1102:bd10/16/2009:svnASUSTeKComputerINC.:pn1005HA:pvrx.x:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rn1005HA:rvrx.xx:cvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:ct10:cvrx.x:
dmi.product.name: 1005HA
dmi.product.version: x.x
dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993674
Title:
Javascript falsely reported as blocked in Firefox
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
[Bug 804943] Re: blcr kernel module failed to build with kernel 3.0 : configure: error: --with-linux argument '3.0-x' is neither a kernel version string nor a full path
I hate the message saying this bug has already been reported. I wonder when will it be fixed. I can't use ghemical on U 12.04 either because of this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804943 Title: blcr kernel module failed to build with kernel 3.0 : configure: error: --with-linux argument '3.0-x' is neither a kernel version string nor a full path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/804943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 804943] Re: blcr kernel module failed to build with kernel 3.0 : configure: error: --with-linux argument '3.0-x' is neither a kernel version string nor a full path
I need the blcr package to run ghemical a critical aplication for me. This error appaently happened because the package is not propperly installed and the system tried to upgrade it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804943 Title: blcr kernel module failed to build with kernel 3.0 : configure: error: --with-linux argument '3.0-x' is neither a kernel version string nor a full path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/804943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 971601] Re: soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
** Visibility changed to: Public ** Description changed: - Its a common crash of LibreOffce v 3.5 and specia 3.51 when importing - certain do and xls documents to LO. It is more frequent on 65 bit - machines. I reported this to LO but they claim they cannot reproduce it. - It occurs in two of my 64 bit machines. Some of the doc which cause LO - to crash my 64 bit machines do not crash LO in my Asus Eee Atom netbook - The xls files either are imported OK (with some files) or crash LO in - the 3 machines. The crashes ocurr with Ubuntu 12.04 beta, Linux Mint 11 - and Linux Mint 12. + Its a common crash of LibreOffce v 3.5 and specially 3.51 when + importing certain do and xls documents to LO. It is more frequent on 64 + bit machines. I reported this to LO but they claim they cannot reproduce + it. It occurs in two of my 64 bit machines. Some of the doc which cause + LO to crash my 64 bit machines do not crash LO in my Asus Eee Atom + netbook The xls files either are imported OK (with some files) or crash + LO in the 3 machines. The crashes ocurr with Ubuntu 12.04 beta, Linux + Mint 11 and Linux Mint 12. Carlos Sevcik carlos.sevci...@gmail.com ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.5.1-1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-21.34-generic 3.2.13 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Apr 2 10:14:42 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120301) ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin ProcEnviron: - PATH=(custom, user) - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SegvReason: reading VMA /usr/lib/ure/lib/libuno_sal.so.3 Signal: 11 SourcePackage: libreoffice Title: soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971601 Title: soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/971601/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)
This forum is frustrating, 3 month after the bug was solved I still cannot break through the maze of broken dependecies one finds when trying to install the solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885740 Title: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpqc/+bug/885740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)
Hi Jordan, Compiling and installing [0] http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/mpqc [1] http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/liboglappth was easy. I also compiled and installed mopac7. But the configuration of [2] http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/libghemical fails with the following message: checking for main in -llapack... yes checking for sc-config... /usr/bin/sc-config checking SC - version... no *** Could not run SC test program, checking why... *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the *** exact error that occured. This usually means SC was incorrectly installed *** or that you have moved SC since it was installed. In the latter case, you *** may want to edit the sc-config script: /usr/bin/sc-config configure: error: Cannot find proper SC version Any idea about how to overcome this without breaking a lot of system dependencies? Thanks Carlos -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885740 Title: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpqc/+bug/885740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)
I quit, ghemical is crucial to me. But fixing all dependencies and getting it to work under Ubuntu 11.10 is beyond my time and patience. I'll quit Ubuntu 11/10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885740 Title: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpqc/+bug/885740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)
Thanks Jordan, I'll try once again following your suggestion and path. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885740 Title: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpqc/+bug/885740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)
This is a bug in libsc-dev, its sc-config tool does not list the SC libraries in the sc-config --libs output, which libghemical uses for linking My attempts to compile ghemical 3 under Mint 12 fail when including mpqc in the libgemical library, I have not been able to satisfy the sc dependency, my guess was that I was using the wrong version of the package but perhaps this is not the case and in fact the sc library has a bug, as suggested in the comment above. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885740 Title: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpqc/+bug/885740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)
I tried to compile Ghemical 3.0 from the tar files in the Ghemical sites, with cfortran installed (sudo apt-get install cfortran) I succeeded in building all the modules except ghemical 3 it self which fails due to some gtk dependencies that are missing. Thus far I have been unable to figure out which versions of the missing libraries are and where to find them. I keep trying. Incidentally, the problem is same with Linux Mint 12rc, so it seems that the problem is Gnome 3 related. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885740 Title: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghemical/+bug/885740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)
I tried installing libghemical v 3 from the ghemical site in /usr/lib and changing the libghemical.so.5 link to point to it and the errors stays the same. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885740 Title: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghemical/+bug/885740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885740] [NEW] Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10
Public bug reported: trying to run ghemical under Ubuntu 11.10 fails with the following message: ghemical: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libghemical.so.5: undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE ** Affects: ghemical (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885740 Title: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghemical/+bug/885740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752135] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752135 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 752135] [NEW] package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: updating the system with update manager ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Apr 5 22:15:44 2011 ErrorMessage: blcr kernel module failed to build InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) PackageVersion: 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 SourcePackage: blcr Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-02 (4 days ago) ** Affects: blcr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752135 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 747955] [NEW] package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: package dind't install when upgrading ro 11.04 beta1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Apr 1 21:16:41 2011 ErrorMessage: blcr kernel module failed to build InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) PackageVersion: 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 SourcePackage: blcr Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-02 (0 days ago) ** Affects: blcr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747955 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 747955] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747955 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397277] [NEW] package automake 1:1.10.2-0ubuntu3.09.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: automake update crashes. Automake cannot be erased with dpkg, apt-get or Synaptic Package Manager. Autoremove or autoclean with apt-get do not solve the problem either. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: automake 1:1.10.2-0ubuntu3.09.04 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: automake1.10 Title: package automake 1:1.10.2-0ubuntu3.09.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic i686 ** Affects: automake1.10 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- package automake 1:1.10.2-0ubuntu3.09.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397277] Re: package automake 1:1.10.2-0ubuntu3.09.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28839130/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28839131/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package automake 1:1.10.2-0ubuntu3.09.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369207] [NEW] Web links are sluggish
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Opening links on several pages is sluggish. You can see the link but dragging the cursor to the link does not result in the little hand that indicates an activable link, clicking on the link has no effect. But if you do nothing and wait a couple of minutes, the problem seems to go away and the link behaves normally. I have observed this in several pages with links that behave normally with the opera browser never open in Firefox or are sluggish as described above. A site where the sluggishness is usually easy to see is www.linux.org, the first link to the articles in the page works OK, but when you try to open the second link to read the article in a whole page, is sluggish or never opens. Again Opera works perfectly well on this site. Using Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042523 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Firefox/3.0.10 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.10+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686 ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Web links are sluggish https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369207] Re: Web links are sluggish
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26131906/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26131907/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: pluginreg.dat.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26131908/pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26131909/profiles.ini.txt -- Web links are sluggish https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 281234] Re: [amd64] bad numbers after creating pdf
In my case the bug happens only using Ubuntu OO not the original files downloaded from www.openoffice.org, I posted this elsewere: [QUOTE]I am running Jaunty with OpenOffice.org 3.01 in 3 different machines, a Dell Workstation with dual Xeon processors, an HP laptop with a dual Centrino processor, and a small HP laptop with a dual AMD Turion64. For some time now I have noticed that when I write a document with lots of equations in it, which look OK in the OO writer or its printouts, the digits (1,2,...,0) get more or less randomly distorted (replaced by a phony symbol) when the document is exported to pdf format. I first thought that it might have something to do with the fonts used (changing from Bitstream Vera Sans to Dejavu Sans or Nimbus Roman 9 makes no difference), but this was not the case. By more or less random I mean it might change from one conversion to the next, or appear only after page 13, while the equations from 1 to 12 might be OK (at least most of the times for that document). But I recently realized that the bug appears only when I export to pdf in my small laptop (HP Pavillion tx1230la with memory expanded to 4 gB, AMD Turion64x2) and does not happen when exporting the same document using the same version of Ubuntu and OO in neither of the two other machines. The OO version installed in the 3 machines was installed using the Synaptic Package Manager provided by Ubuntu and from Ubuntu's repositories. Furthermore, today I downloaded OO 3.0.1 from the OpenOffice.org site (Debian packages for x86-64 systems) and installed everything in the DEBS subdirectory using sudo dpkg -i * and to my surprise the conversions to pdfs in my HP Pavilion tx1230la seem to be working perfectly when I use the OO writer downloaded from the OO site directly. My conclussion: There is a bug in the Ubuntu for x86-64 OO version which does not exists in the packages downloaded directly from the www.OpenOffice.org site. Furthermore, I have the feeling that the bug is not new, I observed distorted digits in some of my manuscripts exported to pdf using Ubuntus's OO 2.x as early as 2 years ago, but was unable to pinpoint the problem as I did now. As said is a somewhat random problem.[/QUOTE] -- [amd64] bad numbers after creating pdf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 281234] Re: [ooo-build] [amd64] bad numbers after creating pdf
I stick to my word, after exporting more than 10 documents in my AMD64 machine, which were buggy with the Ubuntu OO files, the bug showed in none of them using the original OOo built files. -- [ooo-build] [amd64] bad numbers after creating pdf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 281234] Re: [ooo-build] [amd64] bad numbers after creating pdf
I am not sure, but my guess is AMD64 Ubuntu's OO is compiled from source, and something is done differently than in OOo site. Different compiler? Different compiler version? It's hard to say, I don't know the innards of the process. -- [ooo-build] [amd64] bad numbers after creating pdf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 340780] [NEW] Firefox keep asking to be restartarted because it has been updated, and does so one and again forever
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Firefox keep asking to be restarted because it has been updated. If you delete the message it pops back, and no mater how many times you restart Firefox it keeps asking to be restarted. Login out and into my account or rebooting thr machine makes no difference. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 ProcEnviron: PATH=/home/username/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-13-generic i686 ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Firefox keep asking to be restartarted because it has been updated, and does so one and again forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 340780] Re: Firefox keep asking to be restartarted because it has been updated, and does so one and again forever
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23735741/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23735742/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: pluginreg.dat.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23735743/pluginreg.dat.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23735747/profiles.ini.txt -- Firefox keep asking to be restartarted because it has been updated, and does so one and again forever https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
