[Bug 390157] [NEW] [upgrade] New upstream release 0.132
Public bug reported: A new upstream release is available. ** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [upgrade] New upstream release 0.132 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390157] Re: [upgrade] New upstream release 0.132
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.132. To build the source package use zcat sdlmame_0.132-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0 cd sdlmame-0.132 chmod +x debian/rules debian/rules get-orig-source mv sdlmame_0.132.orig.tar.gz ../ cd .. tar xvfz sdlmame_0.132.orig.tar.gz and the source tree should be in sdlmame-0.132 Compiled binaries are available on my PPA as well: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive ** Attachment added: "sdlmame_0.132-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28164898/sdlmame_0.132-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- [upgrade] New upstream release 0.132 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390157] Re: [upgrade] New upstream release 0.132
Released tagged with a "u" are unstable ones, very similar to beta. I'm not going to package them as they seldom even break working code. -- [upgrade] New upstream release 0.132 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335440] Re: Update BTPD version to 0.15
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - btpd 0.15. To build the source package use zcat btpd_0.15-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0 cd btpd-0.15 chmod +x debian/rules debian/rules get-orig-source mv btpd_0.15.orig.tar.gz ../ cd .. tar xvfz btpd_0.15.orig.tar.gz and the source tree should be in btpd-0.15 Compiled binaries are available on my PPA as well: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive Thank you! Cesare. ** Attachment added: "btpd_0.15-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29024696/btpd_0.15-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu) Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Update BTPD version to 0.15 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335440] Re: [upgrade] Update BTPD version to 0.15
** Summary changed: - Update BTPD version to 0.15 + [upgrade] Update BTPD version to 0.15 -- [upgrade] Update BTPD version to 0.15 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335440] Re: [upgrade] Please update btpd to 0.15 version
Please don't change either description or tags, they are used by sponsors to process sponsoring queue. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Sponsorship/SponsorsQueue ** Summary changed: - [karmic] Please update btpd to 0.15 version + [upgrade] Please update btpd to 0.15 version ** Tags added: patch ** Tags removed: upgrade ** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- [upgrade] Please update btpd to 0.15 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 403212] [NEW] [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.133
Public bug reported: A new upstream release is available. ** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - New upstream release 0.133 + [upgrade] New upstream release 0.133 ** Summary changed: - [upgrade] New upstream release 0.133 + [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.133 -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.133 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 403212] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.133
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.133. To build the source package use zcat sdlmame_0.133-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0 cd sdlmame-0.133 chmod +x debian/rules debian/rules get-orig-source mv sdlmame_0.133.orig.tar.gz ../ cd .. tar xvfz sdlmame_0.133.orig.tar.gz and the source tree should be in sdlmame-0.133 Compiled binaries are available on my PPA as well: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive ** Attachment added: "E:\sdlmame\sdlmame_0.133-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29412884/E%3A%5Csdlmame%5Csdlmame_0.133-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Description changed: - A new upstream release is available. + A new upstream release is available for SDLMame. ** Tags added: patch ** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.133 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318304] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318304] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318304] [NEW] [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
Public bug reported: A new upstream has been released. ** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318304] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.128. To build the source package use zcat sdlmame_0.129-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0 cd sdlmame-0.129 chmod +x debian/rules debian/rules get-orig-source mv sdlmame_0.129.orig.tar.gz ../ cd .. tar xvfz sdlmame_0.129.orig.tar.gz and the source tree should be in sdlmame-0.129 Compiled binaries are available on my PPA as well: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive I guess this could be the last stable release before FF. Please upload it! :) Thanks, Cesare. ** Attachment added: ".diff.gz for sdlmame 0.129" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21296903/sdlmame_0.129-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318304] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
Here's some explanation: > - ARCHOPTS=-march=pentium-mmx \ > + ARCHOPTS=-march=pentium2 \ sdlmame requires fast machines or it runs so slow it's unusable; optimization for i686 offers some performance improvement (comment put in changelog) > -Standards-Version: 3.7.3 > +Standards-Version: 3.8.0 prevents lintian from complaining with the following warning: W: sdlmame source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is 3.8.0) > -Architecture: i386 amd64 lpia powerpc > +Architecture: i386 amd64 powerpc lpia architecture is not supported upstream (comment put in changelog) > --- sdlmame-0.128/debian/contrib/manpages/sdlmame.1 > +++ sdlmame-0.129/debian/contrib/manpages/sdlmame.1 > --- sdlmame-0.128/debian/contrib/config/mame.ini > +++ sdlmame-0.129/debian/contrib/config/mame.ini > --- sdlmame-0.129.orig/debian/sdlmame.conffiles > +++ sdlmame-0.129/debian/sdlmame.conffiles configuration file "joymap.dat" removed upstream, above are related changes: manpage: documented new command option; removed reference to joymap.dat mame.ini: removed reference to joymap.dat sdlmame.conffiles: removed reference to joymap.dat (already documented in changelog) > + if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt "0.128u7"; then > + rm -rf /etc/sdlmame/joymap.dat > this should only be run on upgrade, not install. No need for -r either. fixed Successfully built on my ppa: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive/ppa (I had to rename it 0ubuntu2 to avoid version clash) Thank you! Cesare. ** Attachment added: "sdlmame_0.129-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22618317/sdlmame_0.129-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335440] Re: Update BTPD version to 0.15
Thanks for report. It seems there's a bug in 0.15 when tracker sends bad data, upstream maintainers are still looking after it. I'll update the packages as soon as it is fixed, don't expect it for jaunty (9.04) however. Cesare. ** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco) -- Update BTPD version to 0.15 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318304] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
Could anyone please sponsor sdlmame 0.129? Feature Freeze is approaching and I'm concerned it could miss it... :) Thanks! Cesare. -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135879] Re: [needs-packaging] SDLMAME
Could anyone please close this bug? SDLMAME is now in the multiverse repository. ;-) Thanks! Cesare. -- [needs-packaging] SDLMAME https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106805] Re: xmame: incorrect key mapping with french keyboard
Yes, the Xmame site itself suggests migration to SDLMAME as big core changes in baseline MAME(tm) made maintenance too difficult. As for SDLMAME, see Bug #135879 -- xmame: incorrect key mapping with french keyboard https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106805 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154231] Re: G550 (dual) DVI does not work
The bug still affects gutsy. My G550 is an older one with the standard VGA connector as the first output and the DVI connector (which I use with my Samsung SyncMaster 152T LCD monitor) is the second one. Each time I installed Ubuntu from scratch or updated it, I ran into same problem: blank screen with blinking led meaning no input segnal. And yes, the problem is only solved with the Hal closed source library. Unfortunately, Matrox stepped back and they no longer directly support the linux driver for their cards. However, they are still maintained as "unofficial" ones. Look here: http://matrox.tuxx-home.at/viewtopic.php?t=153 I wonder whether those driver can be included in Ubuntu as restricted ones. -- G550 (dual) DVI does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154231 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157731] Alsa randomly chooses default audio card
Public bug reported: This bug is very similar to Bug #8107, which is reported as fixed. But AFAIK it's not the same neither it has been fixed in gutsy. I have two cards on my PC: the onboard one and a PCI SB Live! and I use them both: the onboard one for voip, and the SB for all other purposes. When Alsa starts, it recognises both card, but assigns the primary ID on a random basis, i.e. sometimes it assumes the pci card is the main one and sometimes it chooses the onboard card. The only way I found to solve this is manually editing /usr/share/alsa/alsa.conf, changing the lines defaults.ctl.card defaults.pcm.card after looking for the with $ cat /proc/asound/cards ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Alsa randomly chooses default audio card https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157731 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135879] Re: [needs-packaging] SDLMAME
Unfortunately, you can't post a review unless you are a MOTU reviewer. This is part of the process which leads to inclusion in the official repositories (both for universe and multiverse components), to ensure packages are built "the right way". MOTUs have been really busy during the last days, due to Gutsy official release. If you wonder who MOTUs are, look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU for further info. However, I like to thank you for your feedback! :) -- [needs-packaging] SDLMAME https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158447] [needs-packaging] btpd
Public bug reported: "BTPD is a bittorrent client consisting of a daemon and client commands, which can be used to read and/or manipulate the daemon state." See homepage: http://www.murmeldjur.se/btpd/ I started packaging this, you can find it * in my PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive * or in REVU: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=btpd ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco) -- [needs-packaging] btpd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158451] [needs-packaging] shorten
Public bug reported: Shorten is an old audio file loseless compressor. It has a opensource licence which requires feed payment for professional use, which makes me not very happy about it. It is however still popular, and I think inclusion in the universe repository could help people convert their .shn files to flac. See homepage: http://etree.org/shnutils/shorten/ I started packaging it, you can find it * in my PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive * in REVU: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=shorten ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco) Status: New => In Progress -- [needs-packaging] shorten https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158447] Re: [needs-packaging] btpd
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => In Progress -- [needs-packaging] btpd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135879] Re: [needs-packaging] SDLMAME
You can find them either * on my PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive * on REVU: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=sdlmame Ehm... well... you can also download them from the link you mentioned as I *am* wallyweek... :) I must admit the site is quite ugly, but I have no time to make it shine, with a breathless release cycle as sdlmame one. But packages are the same. Feel free to make any suggestion about them. -- [needs-packaging] SDLMAME https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135879] Re: [needs-packaging] SDLMAME
I own an 1386 machine, I can't build amd64 packages at home, neither I can test them. I started uploading sdlmame on my PPA to check correctness of my rules for amd64, but I'm still considering it some kind of beta release, as I only had some positive feedbacks from one user. I may assume happy users are now two at least, right? :) Also, I could download amd64 packages from my PPA and upload them to the site, but I have both limited bandwidth at home and space on website. I considered to host the site on my home server, but that way, each time a new release is published I wouldn't even read mail, unless limiting bandwidth to a very low percentage. :o As for the package names, they may differ for the distro release and architecture, but I don't understand in what else. Could you please explain that? If there's some error on the site, I'll be glad to fix it. :) Thanks for your help! -- [needs-packaging] SDLMAME https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105461] Re: [needs-packaging] MAC-PORT
This is a duplicate of Bug #119412 -- [needs-packaging] MAC-PORT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105461 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119412] Re: [needs-packaging] mac
My 2-cent contribution. After a long thought, I believe it shoud be included in multiverse, perhaps depending from a meta-package like "media-codec-ugly- multiverse", in a similar way as the "gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly- multiverse" is done. We should consider that .ape format is quite popular, and supply the package as a migration tool to the flac format and clearly deprecate its usage as an audio compressor. Of course, I feel uncomfortable with the custom so-called opensource licence, but it's up to the author to decide about it. As he never asked to remove or stop the mac-port project, I think he can bear with it, so I see no direct copyright infringiment. Should distribution become more and more questionable on author's requests, we could always remove it even from the multiverse repository, which hosts software for which is user's responsibility to check whether he has the right to use the software or not. -- [needs-packaging] mac https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 125738] Re: Please update xmame-sdl to version 0.117
The latest xmame release (0.106) is already in the repositories. Project is in a frozen state at present, and it's like to be discontinued. See xmame homepage for details: http://x.mame.net/ I feel this should be not considered a real bug. ** Changed in: xmame (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- Please update xmame-sdl to version 0.117 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158451] Re: [needs-packaging] shorten
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- [needs-packaging] shorten https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158447] Re: [needs-packaging] btpd
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- [needs-packaging] btpd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135879] Re: [needs-packaging] SDLMAME
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- [needs-packaging] SDLMAME https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135879] Re: [needs-packaging] SDLMAME
I'm currently packaging SDLMame and first package releases have been in Revu since March. Recently, I also become a Launchpad beta tester, and sdlmame is now on my PPA too: http://ppa.launchpad.net/c.falco/ubuntu I'm still waiting for inclusion in the official repository after some reviews, but I need more of them. ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Triaged => In Progress -- [needs-packaging] SDLMAME https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 125738] Re: Please update xmame-sdl to version 0.117
See bug #135879 https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/135879 -- Please update xmame-sdl to version 0.117 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135879] Re: [needs-packaging] SDLMAME
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- [needs-packaging] SDLMAME https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190041] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123
** Attachment added: "sdlmame_0.123-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11817650/sdlmame_0.123-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Tags added: upgrade -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190041] [NEW] [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123
Public bug reported: A new upstream release is out. The new .diff.gz is attached, please use get-orig-source to retrieve source tarball. ** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: upgrade -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190041] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123
Just in case, here's the .dsc too. ** Attachment added: "sdlmame_0.123-0ubuntu1.dsc" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11817656/sdlmame_0.123-0ubuntu1.dsc -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190041] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123
I know there's trouble with upstream site every now and then, however I would expect to see sdlmame0123.zip as the file name to be retrieved. Looks like the $(VER) has the old value. I'm also puzzled with the warning messages. It's likely I've done something wrong with the .diff file, I'll check it ASAP. How did you apply it? -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190041] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123
Here it is. I successfully applied it with the same procedure stated above. ** Attachment added: "sdlmame_0.123.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11841637/sdlmame_0.123.diff.gz -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190041] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123
Ok, I apologize, I definitely got it wrong and attached a bad .diff file (i.e. the one obtained with dpkg-buildpackage). I'll upload the right one this evening, together with some fixes which hopefully should make it build on unofficial archs too. -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.123 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179563] Re: uscan: option --user-agent doesn't work properly
Sorry, I meant examples _in the manpage_. -- uscan: option --user-agent doesn't work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179563 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179563] Re: uscan: option --user-agent doesn't work properly
I'm really puzzled as your example seems to work. :| Just FYI, I sometimes received the "no matching hrefs for watch line" message, and sometimes not at all. I can't tell how many attempts I made, with both version mangling and url regexp. I dare say, example could be more clear. ;) BTW, unless server configuration has changed, it's obviously my fault so I apologize for filing a non-existant bug. :( -- uscan: option --user-agent doesn't work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179563 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179563] uscan: option --user-agent doesn't work properly
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: devscripts I'm trying to write a watch file for sdlmame, hoste on a web server requiring the User-Agent header. Easier to try than to explain: $ wget -U "Debian uscan" http://rbelmont.mameworld.info/sdlmame0122.zip works fine, whilst $ uscan --user-agent "Debian uscan" does not. I would also suggest to make --user-agent an opts entry in the debian/watch file, something like: opts="useragent=DebianUscan" \ http://rbelmont.mameworld.info/?page_id=163 sdlmame(\d+)\.zip ** Affects: devscripts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- uscan: option --user-agent doesn't work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179563 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223780] Re: hdc: status error: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }
OK, just to report I have the same problem with a Philips DVDR1640P,
which worked until I upgraded my HD to a SATA one, putting the dvd
burner as Master on channel 0 (i.e. it was /dev/hdb, now it's /dev/hda).
--
hdc: status error: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223780
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.126
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco) ** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) => (unassigned) -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.126 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125
I'm sorry, I'm still confused a bit about fix committing process. :( You should be able to apply the first .diff.gz file commited (the >4mb one) to the 0.123 source with the same procedure used upgrading 0.122 to 0.123 in hardy: apt-get source sdlmame wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14565553/sdlmame_0.125.diff.gz cd sdlmame-0.123/ zcat ../sdlmame_0.125.diff.gz | patch -p1 debian/rules get-orig-source (see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/190041) If get-orig-source doesn't retrieve sdlmame0125.zip, please try uscan --user-agent ubuntu and then run get-orig-source again (it should check .zip presence before trying to download it). Also, please... is there some recommended procedure for committing fixes and upgrades? Thanks! -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125
Ooops! You can't run uscan or it will download latest unstable release! However, get-orig-source works for me. Could you post a log, please? Thanks! -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125
Ok, forget about the .diff files posted, I've missed this: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-January/024913.html Here's the .diff.gz I've just used to build sdlmame 0.125 source package with following commands: zcat sdlmame_0.125-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0 cd sdlmame-0.125 chmod +x debian/rules debian/rules get-orig-source mv sdlmame_0.125.orig.tar.gz ../ cd .. tar xvfz sdlmame_0.125.orig.tar.gz now you should have the correct source tree in sdlmame-0.125 ** Attachment added: "sdlmame_0.125-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15546197/sdlmame_0.125-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125
This is the .diff.gz obtained with debuild -S. Is that what you meant? ** Attachment added: "sdlmame_0.125-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14893544/sdlmame_0.125-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125
** Attachment added: "Upgrades sdlmame source from 0.123 to 0.125" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14565553/sdlmame_0.125.diff.gz -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] [NEW] [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sdlmame First update after Hardy release, this is a patch to latest SDLMame stable release. ** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] [NEW] [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sdlmame As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because: * it fixes a LP bug * it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on exotic platforms * it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured since version 0.123, currently in multiverse * I've been bombed by user requests for it ;-) * its builds(tm) [2] * it can't do any arm as it has no dependencies which can be broken Please have a look at the attached files and, please, *do* upload it, thanks! :-) [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 [2] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive [3] https://edge.launchpad.net/%7Ec.falco/+archive/+build/743354/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz ** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
** Attachment added: "PPA build log for amd64" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648903/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
** Attachment added: "PPA build log for i386" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648918/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
** Attachment added: "diffstat for FF request" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648926/diffstat.txt -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
** Attachment added: "diff for changelog (whatsnew.txt) as per FF request" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648950/changelog.diff -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
** Attachment added: "installation log on my ubuntu box (hardy)" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648964/install.log -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
** Description changed: Binary package hint: sdlmame As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because: * it fixes a LP bug * it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on exotic platforms * it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured since version 0.123, currently in multiverse * I've been bombed by user requests for it ;-) - * its builds(tm) [2] + * it builds(tm)! [2] * it can't do any arm as it has no dependencies which can be broken Please have a look at the attached files and, please, *do* upload it, thanks! :-) [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 [2] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive - [3] https://edge.launchpad.net/%7Ec.falco/+archive/+build/743354/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz ** Description changed: Binary package hint: sdlmame As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because: - * it fixes a LP bug + * it fixes a LP bug [2] * it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on exotic platforms * it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured since version 0.123, currently in multiverse * I've been bombed by user requests for it ;-) - * it builds(tm)! [2] + * "it builds!"(tm) [3] * it can't do any arm as it has no dependencies which can be broken Please have a look at the attached files and, please, *do* upload it, thanks! :-) [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 - [2] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive + [2] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/245318 + [3] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive ** Description changed: Binary package hint: sdlmame As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because: * it fixes a LP bug [2] * it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on exotic platforms * it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured since version 0.123, currently in multiverse * I've been bombed by user requests for it ;-) * "it builds!"(tm) [3] - * it can't do any arm as it has no dependencies which can be broken + * it can't do any arm since it has no dependencies which can be broken Please have a look at the attached files and, please, *do* upload it, thanks! :-) [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 [2] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/245318 [3] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive ** Description changed: Binary package hint: sdlmame As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because: * it fixes a LP bug [2] * it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on exotic platforms * it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured since version 0.123, currently in multiverse * I've been bombed by user requests for it ;-) * "it builds!"(tm) [3] * it can't do any arm since it has no dependencies which can be broken + * I have tested it with the games which are freely available + Please have a look at the attached files and, please, *do* upload it, thanks! :-) [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 [2] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/245318 [3] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive ** Description changed: Binary package hint: sdlmame As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because: * it fixes a LP bug [2] * it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on exotic platforms * it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured since version 0.123, currently in multiverse * I've been bombed by user requests for it ;-) * "it builds!"(tm) [3] - * it can't do any arm since it has no dependencies which can be broken + * it can't do any harm since it has no dependencies which can be broken * I have tested it with the games which are freely available Please have a look at the attached files and, please, *do* upload it, thanks! :-) [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 [2] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/245318 [3] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.128. To build the source package use zcat sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0 cd sdlmame-0.128 chmod +x debian/rules debian/rules get-orig-source mv sdlmame_0.128.orig.tar.gz ../ cd .. tar xvfz sdlmame_0.128.orig.tar.gz and the source tree should be in sdlmame-0.128 Compiled binaries are available on my PPA as well: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive I also requested a FeatureFreeze exception as suggested: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/285204 Please... *do* upload it! :-) ** Attachment added: ".diff.gz for SDLMAME 0.128" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18649048/sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Summary changed: - [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127 + [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.128 -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127
A new upstream release (0.128) is expected next week so I'll upload a diff for it as soon as it's released. In the meantime, I'll have a look at the Freeze Exception Process. Thanks! Cesare. -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
Please also close this bug as a FF is no longer needed. Thanks, Cesare. -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.128
I see jaunty has already been branched. Could please someone upload the updated package? Thanks, Cesare. -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
- Each new release usually adds previously unsupported games or improves support for the already emulated ones. - Mame(TM) has its own bug reporting site (MAMETesters), and each release fixes a number of them (listed in whastnew.txt) - At some point since 0.123 a new utility for laserdisc games has been released (it's in the sdlmame-tools binary) and a deprecated one has been removed - Internally, each new release also cleans and improves the code, and this obviously makes SDLMAME more stable and fast - Ubuntu-wise, I fixed a couple of packaging bugs -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
I've never done a backport before. Is this the right place to start from? https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports/ -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275326] Re: error after btpd restart "btcli: cannot open connection"
This is not properly a bug, it's related to how btpd works in Ubuntu (see /usr/share/doc/btpd/README.Debian). btpd runs as a system daemon with its own user, you should use the init script to control it: sudo /etc/init.d/btpd stop -> kill sudo /etc/init.d/btpd start -> launch sudo /etc/init.d/btpd restart -> first kill then launch again However, I understand this is not very user-friendly. I'm thinking of a better way to force users to manage the daemon correctly. Any suggestion is welcome. Cheers, Cesare. -- error after btpd restart "btcli: cannot open connection" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 245318] Re: package xmame-tools None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/xmame-tools.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/chdman', which is also in package sdlmame-tools
Fix committed with upgrade to release 0.126: see https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 ** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco) -- package xmame-tools None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/xmame-tools.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/chdman', which is also in package sdlmame-tools https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.126
The attached diff.gz: - upgrades sdlmame to latest stable release 0.126 - fixes conflicting dep with xmame-tools (I can't fix xmame-tools too as I'm not the maintainer): https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/245318 To build the source package use zcat sdlmame_0.126-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0 cd sdlmame-0.126 chmod +x debian/rules debian/rules get-orig-source mv sdlmame_0.126.orig.tar.gz ../ cd .. tar xvfz sdlmame_0.126.orig.tar.gz and the source tree should be in sdlmame-0.126 ** Attachment added: "Upgrades to 0.126 + Fixes bug #245318" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16886263/sdlmame_0.126-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.126 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127
A new upstream release -0.127- has been released, this is the .diff.gz for upgrading. Compiled binaries are available on my PPA as well: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive To build the source package use zcat sdlmame_0.127-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0 cd sdlmame-0.127 chmod +x debian/rules debian/rules get-orig-source mv sdlmame_0.127.orig.tar.gz ../ cd .. tar xvfz sdlmame_0.127.orig.tar.gz and the source tree should be in sdlmame-0.127 I hope this will fit FF... Cesare. ** Summary changed: - [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.126 + [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127 ** Attachment added: "diff.gz for SDLMame 0.127" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17034190/sdlmame_0.127-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335440] Re: [upgrade] Please update btpd to 0.15 version
1. Ooops! Fixed, thanks! 2. debian/rules: mentioned as a side effect of the new debian/logrotate file debian/patches... not changed; it has been adapted to updated code. I see no reasons to tell this to the user 3. btpd is in universe. Adress is correct ;-) 4. I'm sorry, I can't! get-orig-source checks the original source after downloading against its md5sum to ensure the downloaded tarball is good. Here's the new .diff.gz, thank you for your help! ** Attachment added: "btpd_0.15-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30779515/btpd_0.15-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed ** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete ** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu) Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- [upgrade] Please update btpd to 0.15 version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 403212] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.133
I know work is in progress to let sdlmame enter the official debian repository, and when it's done we can see whether diversion is needed. In the meantime, I see no reason to sync the official package with an unofficial repository for debian. -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.133 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125
This is the .diff.gz obtained with debuild -S. Is that what you meant? ** Attachment added: "sdlmame_0.125-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14893544/sdlmame_0.125-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.125 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127
A new upstream release -0.127- has been released, this is the .diff.gz for upgrading. Compiled binaries are available on my PPA as well: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive To build the source package use zcat sdlmame_0.127-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0 cd sdlmame-0.127 chmod +x debian/rules debian/rules get-orig-source mv sdlmame_0.127.orig.tar.gz ../ cd .. tar xvfz sdlmame_0.127.orig.tar.gz and the source tree should be in sdlmame-0.127 I hope this will fit FF... Cesare. ** Summary changed: - [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.126 + [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127 ** Attachment added: "diff.gz for SDLMame 0.127" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17034190/sdlmame_0.127-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.126
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco) ** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) => (unassigned) -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.126 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 245318] Re: package xmame-tools None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/xmame-tools.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/chdman', which is also in package sdlmame-tools
Fix committed with upgrade to release 0.126: see https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 ** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco) -- package xmame-tools None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/xmame-tools.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/chdman', which is also in package sdlmame-tools https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/245318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.126
The attached diff.gz: - upgrades sdlmame to latest stable release 0.126 - fixes conflicting dep with xmame-tools (I can't fix xmame-tools too as I'm not the maintainer): https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/245318 To build the source package use zcat sdlmame_0.126-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0 cd sdlmame-0.126 chmod +x debian/rules debian/rules get-orig-source mv sdlmame_0.126.orig.tar.gz ../ cd .. tar xvfz sdlmame_0.126.orig.tar.gz and the source tree should be in sdlmame-0.126 ** Attachment added: "Upgrades to 0.126 + Fixes bug #245318" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16886263/sdlmame_0.126-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.126 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275326] Re: error after btpd restart "btcli: cannot open connection"
This is not properly a bug, it's related to how btpd works in Ubuntu (see /usr/share/doc/btpd/README.Debian). btpd runs as a system daemon with its own user, you should use the init script to control it: sudo /etc/init.d/btpd stop -> kill sudo /etc/init.d/btpd start -> launch sudo /etc/init.d/btpd restart -> first kill then launch again However, I understand this is not very user-friendly. I'm thinking of a better way to force users to manage the daemon correctly. Any suggestion is welcome. Cheers, Cesare. -- error after btpd restart "btcli: cannot open connection" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127
A new upstream release (0.128) is expected next week so I'll upload a diff for it as soon as it's released. In the meantime, I'll have a look at the Freeze Exception Process. Thanks! Cesare. -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] [NEW] [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sdlmame As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because: * it fixes a LP bug * it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on exotic platforms * it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured since version 0.123, currently in multiverse * I've been bombed by user requests for it ;-) * its builds(tm) [2] * it can't do any arm as it has no dependencies which can be broken Please have a look at the attached files and, please, *do* upload it, thanks! :-) [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 [2] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive [3] https://edge.launchpad.net/%7Ec.falco/+archive/+build/743354/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz ** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
** Attachment added: "PPA build log for amd64" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648903/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
** Attachment added: "PPA build log for i386" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648918/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
** Attachment added: "diffstat for FF request" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648926/diffstat.txt -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
** Attachment added: "diff for changelog (whatsnew.txt) as per FF request" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648950/changelog.diff -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
** Attachment added: "installation log on my ubuntu box (hardy)" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18648964/install.log -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
** Description changed: Binary package hint: sdlmame As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because: * it fixes a LP bug * it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on exotic platforms * it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured since version 0.123, currently in multiverse * I've been bombed by user requests for it ;-) - * its builds(tm) [2] + * it builds(tm)! [2] * it can't do any arm as it has no dependencies which can be broken Please have a look at the attached files and, please, *do* upload it, thanks! :-) [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 [2] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive - [3] https://edge.launchpad.net/%7Ec.falco/+archive/+build/743354/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz ** Description changed: Binary package hint: sdlmame As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because: - * it fixes a LP bug + * it fixes a LP bug [2] * it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on exotic platforms * it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured since version 0.123, currently in multiverse * I've been bombed by user requests for it ;-) - * it builds(tm)! [2] + * "it builds!"(tm) [3] * it can't do any arm as it has no dependencies which can be broken Please have a look at the attached files and, please, *do* upload it, thanks! :-) [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 - [2] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive + [2] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/245318 + [3] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive ** Description changed: Binary package hint: sdlmame As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because: * it fixes a LP bug [2] * it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on exotic platforms * it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured since version 0.123, currently in multiverse * I've been bombed by user requests for it ;-) * "it builds!"(tm) [3] - * it can't do any arm as it has no dependencies which can be broken + * it can't do any arm since it has no dependencies which can be broken Please have a look at the attached files and, please, *do* upload it, thanks! :-) [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 [2] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/245318 [3] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive ** Description changed: Binary package hint: sdlmame As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because: * it fixes a LP bug [2] * it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on exotic platforms * it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured since version 0.123, currently in multiverse * I've been bombed by user requests for it ;-) * "it builds!"(tm) [3] * it can't do any arm since it has no dependencies which can be broken + * I have tested it with the games which are freely available + Please have a look at the attached files and, please, *do* upload it, thanks! :-) [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 [2] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/245318 [3] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive ** Description changed: Binary package hint: sdlmame As suggested in [1] I'd like to ask for a FF for new SDLMAME, because: * it fixes a LP bug [2] * it also fixes the annoying mailing complaining it doesn't build on exotic platforms * it's really outdated: 5 (five!) major releases have occured since version 0.123, currently in multiverse * I've been bombed by user requests for it ;-) * "it builds!"(tm) [3] - * it can't do any arm since it has no dependencies which can be broken + * it can't do any harm since it has no dependencies which can be broken * I have tested it with the games which are freely available Please have a look at the attached files and, please, *do* upload it, thanks! :-) [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/231223 [2] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/245318 [3] https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231223] Re: [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.128. To build the source package use zcat sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0 cd sdlmame-0.128 chmod +x debian/rules debian/rules get-orig-source mv sdlmame_0.128.orig.tar.gz ../ cd .. tar xvfz sdlmame_0.128.orig.tar.gz and the source tree should be in sdlmame-0.128 Compiled binaries are available on my PPA as well: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive I also requested a FeatureFreeze exception as suggested: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdlmame/+bug/285204 Please... *do* upload it! :-) ** Attachment added: ".diff.gz for SDLMAME 0.128" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18649048/sdlmame_0.128-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Summary changed: - [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.127 + [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.128 -- [upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
- Each new release usually adds previously unsupported games or improves support for the already emulated ones. - Mame(TM) has its own bug reporting site (MAMETesters), and each release fixes a number of them (listed in whastnew.txt) - At some point since 0.123 a new utility for laserdisc games has been released (it's in the sdlmame-tools binary) and a deprecated one has been removed - Internally, each new release also cleans and improves the code, and this obviously makes SDLMAME more stable and fast - Ubuntu-wise, I fixed a couple of packaging bugs -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285204] Re: [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128
I've never done a backport before. Is this the right place to start from? https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports/ -- [FeatureFreeze] New upstream: SDLMAME 0.128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135879] Re: [needs-packaging] SDLMAME
I'm currently packaging SDLMame and first package releases have been in Revu since March. Recently, I also become a Launchpad beta tester, and sdlmame is now on my PPA too: http://ppa.launchpad.net/c.falco/ubuntu I'm still waiting for inclusion in the official repository after some reviews, but I need more of them. ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Triaged => In Progress -- [needs-packaging] SDLMAME https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 125738] Re: Please update xmame-sdl to version 0.117
See bug #135879 https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/135879 -- Please update xmame-sdl to version 0.117 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125738 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154231] Re: G550 (dual) DVI does not work
The bug still affects gutsy. My G550 is an older one with the standard VGA connector as the first output and the DVI connector (which I use with my Samsung SyncMaster 152T LCD monitor) is the second one. Each time I installed Ubuntu from scratch or updated it, I ran into same problem: blank screen with blinking led meaning no input segnal. And yes, the problem is only solved with the Hal closed source library. Unfortunately, Matrox stepped back and they no longer directly support the linux driver for their cards. However, they are still maintained as "unofficial" ones. Look here: http://matrox.tuxx-home.at/viewtopic.php?t=153 I wonder whether those driver can be included in Ubuntu as restricted ones. -- G550 (dual) DVI does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154231 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157731] Alsa randomly chooses default audio card
Public bug reported: This bug is very similar to Bug #8107, which is reported as fixed. But AFAIK it's not the same neither it has been fixed in gutsy. I have two cards on my PC: the onboard one and a PCI SB Live! and I use them both: the onboard one for voip, and the SB for all other purposes. When Alsa starts, it recognises both card, but assigns the primary ID on a random basis, i.e. sometimes it assumes the pci card is the main one and sometimes it chooses the onboard card. The only way I found to solve this is manually editing /usr/share/alsa/alsa.conf, changing the lines defaults.ctl.card defaults.pcm.card after looking for the with $ cat /proc/asound/cards ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Alsa randomly chooses default audio card https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157731 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135879] Re: [needs-packaging] SDLMAME
Unfortunately, you can't post a review unless you are a MOTU reviewer. This is part of the process which leads to inclusion in the official repositories (both for universe and multiverse components), to ensure packages are built "the right way". MOTUs have been really busy during the last days, due to Gutsy official release. If you wonder who MOTUs are, look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU for further info. However, I like to thank you for your feedback! :) -- [needs-packaging] SDLMAME https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158451] Re: [needs-packaging] shorten
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- [needs-packaging] shorten https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158447] Re: [needs-packaging] btpd
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- [needs-packaging] btpd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135879] Re: [needs-packaging] SDLMAME
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- [needs-packaging] SDLMAME https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179563] uscan: option --user-agent doesn't work properly
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: devscripts I'm trying to write a watch file for sdlmame, hoste on a web server requiring the User-Agent header. Easier to try than to explain: $ wget -U "Debian uscan" http://rbelmont.mameworld.info/sdlmame0122.zip works fine, whilst $ uscan --user-agent "Debian uscan" does not. I would also suggest to make --user-agent an opts entry in the debian/watch file, something like: opts="useragent=DebianUscan" \ http://rbelmont.mameworld.info/?page_id=163 sdlmame(\d+)\.zip ** Affects: devscripts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- uscan: option --user-agent doesn't work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179563 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158447] [needs-packaging] btpd
Public bug reported: "BTPD is a bittorrent client consisting of a daemon and client commands, which can be used to read and/or manipulate the daemon state." See homepage: http://www.murmeldjur.se/btpd/ I started packaging this, you can find it * in my PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive * or in REVU: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=btpd ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco) -- [needs-packaging] btpd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158451] [needs-packaging] shorten
Public bug reported: Shorten is an old audio file loseless compressor. It has a opensource licence which requires feed payment for professional use, which makes me not very happy about it. It is however still popular, and I think inclusion in the universe repository could help people convert their .shn files to flac. See homepage: http://etree.org/shnutils/shorten/ I started packaging it, you can find it * in my PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive * in REVU: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=shorten ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco) Status: New => In Progress -- [needs-packaging] shorten https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 158447] Re: [needs-packaging] btpd
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => In Progress -- [needs-packaging] btpd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158447 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135879] Re: [needs-packaging] SDLMAME
You can find them either * on my PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive * on REVU: http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=sdlmame Ehm... well... you can also download them from the link you mentioned as I *am* wallyweek... :) I must admit the site is quite ugly, but I have no time to make it shine, with a breathless release cycle as sdlmame one. But packages are the same. Feel free to make any suggestion about them. -- [needs-packaging] SDLMAME https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
