[Bug 22007] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
LinkedIn Bug, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Chad Chad Bernier Graduate Student at GA Tech Greater Atlanta Area Confirm that you know Chad Bernier: https://www.linkedin.com/e/egwl0p-hmlbvutw-3b/isd/1719914/mdJGqebh/?hs=falsetok=2LXvu-drPJj5Y1 -- You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe: http://www.linkedin.com/e/egwl0p-hmlbvutw-3b/X_ghgi6Yq_hzHLW4wEDEIDa5pm642o3zauNbxv/goo/22007%40bugs%2Elaunchpad%2Enet/20061/I5708578456_1/?hs=falsetok=2HRJOCskHJj5Y1 (c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007 Title: no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-screensaver/+bug/22007/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183685] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
LinkedIn Bug, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Chad Chad Bernier Graduate Student at GA Tech Greater Atlanta Area Confirm that you know Chad Bernier: https://www.linkedin.com/e/v5h921-hmlbvvm1-29/isd/17199145633/l2Q0nY8L/?hs=falsetok=1STYEOdOHJj5Y1 -- You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe: http://www.linkedin.com/e/v5h921-hmlbvvm1-29/kzwtcXgfHuFUPexzb-C6gc9flXhhaaso_mYIPTL/goo/183685%40bugs%2Elaunchpad%2Enet/20061/I5708578511_1/?hs=falsetok=1-KLwhGfvJj5Y1 (c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685 Title: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compcomm-plugins-main/+bug/183685/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 22007] Re: no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
I liked the app solution. I checked it out when I was using Ubuntu. I don't have a linux right now, and I am not sure which I will pick when I put it on again. I don't think this is an issue though. There are more important things to work on. Screen savers haven't been necessary for years, and they are often annoying. Either you set it to a really long timeout, or they pop up in the middle of a TV show. I want the screen either on, or off. Save some electricity and let your monitor go blank, sleep, or off. If you like a certain screen saver that much, you can install the stuff needed to make it work right. Linux is all about messing with things anyways. On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Irios nachodelosr...@gmail.com wrote: Why is it that we *have* to be stuck with the suckiest screensaver selector of any platform? We've got some of the coolest screensavers, but some are really very bad; however, there's no way to make a selection, and all users are stuck with choosing just one, or letting any one pop up at random. All because a square headed upstream maintainer has determined It Is Bad for Us. Who cares about diverging from Gnome upstream in this? Don't we diverge from upstream with the notifier, for example, which is far more important? Let's kick the screen saver selector in the butt! Then we may push it upstream, and everything will be dandy. -- no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235806] Re: maximized window extent wrong with two panels on bottom screen edge
weird. i have a different problem. anyone know if there is a bug report? When i have two screens (actually, only when the second screen is turned on at boot), my window borders disappear only for maximized or near maximized windows. -- maximized window extent wrong with two panels on bottom screen edge https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 22007] Re: no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
I would just like to say that I'd really like this package to be in some kind of a repository. I find things in the local or obsolete section annoying. On 6/11/08, James_pic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: xFX: I thought you might like to know that the current version of gnome- screensaver can accept themes from ~/.local/share/applications/screensavers, as well as /usr/share/applications/screensavers. I've attached a hacked version of screensaver-settings, which modifies themes in this folder rather than in /usr/share/... . I'm not an experienced programmer, so it's kinda kludgy -- e.g, it can't create the directory ~/.local/share/applications/screensavers if it doesn't already exist -- but otherwise it seems to work more or less as expected, so it can persistently modify screensaver settings (per user) without root access. It's really just a proof of concept, but it'd be nice to have something like this in the next version of screensaver-settings ** Attachment added: screensaver-settings-0.3.0-modified.tar.bz2 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15200400/screensaver-settings-0.3.0-modified.tar.bz2 -- no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 201330] Re: [regression] need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting
yea, ubuntu's decision to blacklist radeon mobilities and their decision to not support fake raid 5, has really been causing me to doubt my choice of ubuntu. I might try something else . On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:13 AM, David Chamberlain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also have the Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500] video card as a part of my Dell Inspiron 5100 which has always worked so long as xorg.conf was setup correctly. If my understanding is correct, Ubuntu is disabling compiz on ATI cards using the OPEN SOURCE driver The OPEN SOURCE driver which by the way WORKS, and the PROPRIETARY one doesn't (thanks to some really asinine back room OEM deals ATI made awhile back) and Ubuntu disables **working** video cards using an **open source** driver?? Okay what just happened here, I'm feeling a bit dizzy because this is definitely **NOT** the way I thought things worked... --bornagainpenguin PS: If my understanding is incorrect, I apologize now, but really what am I supposed to think when it appears my WORKING video card is being blacklisted because wait for it. it's using an open source driver! ** Attachment added: lspci -vn.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13896457/lspci%20-vn.txt -- [regression] need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. ** Attachment added: unnamed http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13902053/unnamed -- [regression] need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
no one in the ubuntu community seems to care. They don't aim it towards the people who use raid5. they aim it towards the people who can't even diagnose a compiz problem with their video driver. There was that one guy working on the bug before. I was helping him, but i lost access to the hardware. It wasn't my computer. He was unable to finish working on it because the new software wasn't ready. It sounds like all the hard work has been done, the software is ready, but it still isn't working. it's quite hard to understand. I wish i could help, but I don't have the hardware. the state of this bug in ubuntu is absolutely ridiculous. Gentoo and fedora have had this working for a long time now. I might stop using ubuntu someday, because it bores me. If you can afford it, you might want to get a hardware raid card. It will be much easier to get to work, and it will be much safer. I will seriously consider that option myself whenever i finally build a new desktop. The problem is finding an affordable one with more than 4 ports. On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Jochen Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let me try to summarize what has happened so far: - this bug has been posted more than one year ago - Feisty has come and gone - so has Gutsy - Hardy is one day before release, with this problem still being unsolved I have been using Ubuntu now for almost one year. So far, I've been pleasantly surprised. But this issue is really worrying me, since I rely on the RAID feature for my new machine. I can only second the comment about most of today's motherboards being equipped with RAID (5) functionality. Does anyone have a honest clue when we can except a fix? -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. ** Attachment added: unnamed http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13840750/unnamed -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
I'd like to meet these people who suggest to use just use linux software raid. It has its purpose, and we would be using it if it fit the bill. The computer with $500 worth of hard drives, the huge case and power supply needed to run them, and all that jazz, is probably the best computer in the house. It probably has other expensive components making it useful for gaming, video production, modeling, or other things. That stuff usually needs to be done in windows. most of us can not escape windows 100% of the time. If we do need windows, we are going to want it on the best computer in the house, the one with a raid5 array. another issue, what if you already have your 2TB raid5 array almost full on a windows computer. THEN you decide to install linux. what can you do then? Do you have another 2TB of free space to backup your raid5 array to so you can reformat it? I know I wouldn't. your options 1) get a hardware raid card 2) use a different distro 3) never run windows natively on that computer 4) don't use raid at all number 2 is the mostly likely for people to choose, because all the others require great sacrifice. There is a 5th option, but it isn't for the faint of heart. You could try hacking raid 5 support together yourself. But this isn't the ubuntu way. If you run a custom compiled kernel, is it really still ubuntu? But by asking this question, it can be reasonably assumed that you are either unable or unwilling to try this. I switched to ubuntu because i got sick of fiddling with everything in gentoo, and nothing else i tried was impressive. On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:09 PM, nox216 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't expect this to be fixed anytime soon. Despite software fake RAID being on a majority of shipping motherboards, and despite dmraid being in a workable place with the correct kernel modifications, there just isn't any interest in adding this functionality to Ubuntu. Most responses consist of well, use Linux software RAID. *shrug* -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. ** Attachment added: unnamed http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13843656/unnamed -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 201330] Re: [regression] need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting
oh i thought it wasn't enabled by default. I installed hardy a long time ago, and have been using ubuntu since dapper beta. I thought you had to go enable desktop effects. maybe I just had to go form minimal to custom or something. How many clueless people really run linux anyways? I know it is getting easier and easier every year. But bussiness and schools would have a system administrator to take care of these things. People who buy their computers with linux pre-installed would be taken care of by the manufacturer. People who custom build computers from scratch could figure it out too. People who have their computers fixed by a family member or something would have them to take care of it. So? How many people buy a computer with windows, are responsible for maintaining it themselves, figure out that linux even exists, decides to install it, and still can't diagnose simple issues? I think that most computer clueless people don't even know what linux or ubuntu is. yea i added the skip checks thing, and it's all fixed by now. but the reason i use ubuntu is because I don't want to mess with my system all the time. I can figure out how to compile things from source, and all that jibber jabber. I do sometimes. But I don't want to have to. I shouldn't have to use such a workaround because some computer illiterate people try to run linux on bad hardware. I buy computers specifically with linux in mind and try to only buy linux compatible hardware. that is one of the main reasons i bought a thinkpad. I am using a beta version so i can put up with this stuff. I find it a little bit fun. but I don't like the idea of someone deliberately crippling my computer. again this isn't about me, but how many people are almost like me? the people who could fix the issue but don't want to. I dunno, you guys do what you think is best. I might quit ubuntu when i get a new computer because it bores me. I like that i can usually get help and usually find things in debs. I like how it works pretty well most of the time. But i don't like it when i need something new and have to jump through all kinds of hoops to get it. i think i want to find something gentoo based. ubuntu is great for work computers, but no fun for personal computers. my next computer will be powerful enough to have both. I should get two new computers. some things only a desktop can do, and other things only a laptop. both of mine are aging. but there is the issue of low income and high debt. sorry for all that. I'm just bored. I know I am not the person this is aimed at. First of all, it will be aimed at people who don't run alpha/beta OSs. I always find myself in between the cracks though. its like with cell phones. use them too much and prepaid is just as expensive as contract. but you don't use the whole contract. They screw you either way. you can delete this message if you want. I just don't get any attention anymore. I ended up with no friends for a whole year and won't be making any new ones until september probably. I tried being not enrolled in school for a year. I found the real world to be terrible, am living with parents, and have no friends because none of them live near here. I found little work i was willing to do, which ended up working for a college partime, but that way doesn't make you friends. I always do things a weird way and it has downsides. hopefully the ATI bug will be fixed in Hardy+1. anyone who would use only LTS releases does not need compiz. thank you everyone. the ubuntu community is awesome. On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Bryce Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, I showed bug 195051 to Alex and chatted with him a bit. A lot of -ati's internals were written prior to having access to register documentation, so there's a lot of educated guesses in -ati that proved to be wrong once the docs were in hand, and lead to random crashes like this, and Alex believes this is the case with this bug. He did not have a workaround to suggest, and confirmed Travis' finding that the issue is not going to be limited to a specific chipset so pci id checks wouldn't be a reliable workaround. He has plans to go through and fix up all these mappings correctly, within the next 3-6 months. Unfortunately that rules out a 8.04.1 fix (and even if it could be achieved in that timeframe, the size of the rework would probably be beyond our bug-risk threshhold.) Meanwhile, I'll make sure alex remains aware of the bug, and try to improve the reports upstream so it will be fixed for Intrepid. The work can be tracked at bug 195051 here, and at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15096 upstream (unless someone knows of a more appropriate upstream bug?) So, I'm resetting this to WONTFIX. ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Won't Fix -- [regression] need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You
Re: [Bug 201330] Re: [regression] need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting
Why do they need to be blacklisted in the first place? isn't compiz turned off by default? If people turn it on, and run into problems, they can just turn it back off. Why is it that difficult? If there are problems with the liveCD, make an option to boot it with compiz turned off. It ain't that hard. I remember when i needed special kernel parameters to get it to recognize my hardware, but I figured it out. It's this thing called google. On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Kees Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, above comment is based on IRC discussions with Amaranth, who feels the blacklist is the correct fix. I still think that blacklisting open drivers is a mistake. -- [regression] need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. ** Attachment added: unnamed http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13528708/unnamed -- [regression] need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 201330] Re: Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting
your welcome. I thought it was a nice idea. However, you will have to do it again every time compiz is updated, like it was again last night. On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 9:13 AM, caribo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My Radeon Mobility 7500 has always worked with Compiz ...FED UP WITH HAVING TO FRIG /usr/bin/compiz :-( 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500] PLEASE WHITELIST... lspci -vn 01:00.0 0300: 1002:4c57 (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: 1028:012a Flags: bus master, VGA palette snoop, stepping, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 11 Memory at e000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] I/O ports at c000 [size=256] Memory at fcff (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] [virtual] Expansion ROM at fc00 [disabled] [size=128K] Capabilities: [58] AGP version 2.0 Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 -- Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. ** Attachment added: unnamed http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13383198/unnamed -- Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201330] Re: Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting
i guess this isn't ready quite yet. I updated my compiz again and it stopped working. It took me a few minutes to figure it out. I first though it had to do with my new version of awn. this time i took an even easier fix. i went into /usr/bin/compiz, went to the laptop detect portion, and changed return 1 to return 0. hahaha, it can still check but ignore the result. Open source and scripts rule. -- Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 135548] Re: [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression
its a good idea to buy a new battery every 18 months or so. On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Ted Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to mark this bug as Incomplete right now as asac's problem seems to be caused by hardware (old battery). If there are other people still seeing this on Hardy (which has the upstream fix) could you please post similar logs and reopen the bug. Thank you. Ted. ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135548 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. ** Attachment added: unnamed http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13124026/unnamed -- [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135548 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 135548] Re: [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression
ok wish you luck. Mine was fixed a long time ago back in this bug. I just set it to 2% instead of time, and it works great. My sister's windows laptop doesn't even warn you, it will just fall asleep. My hardy warns me several times before actually hibernating. I don't think i will be getting a new laptop for almost a year, and even with a new one, the old one would be good for plenty of things. good luck with whatever your plan is, hope you find a good deal. On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:23 PM, arand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alright, changing threshold percent levels AND profile/time/policy did the trick for me, so presumably the problem for me lies in the inability to use time policy - This DID work for me somewhere on alpha6 (see former comment by me [2008-03-31]), and since I have values set to low=1200, crit=300, act=120, then before going down to 8% (time=89) and freezing it should pass all or at least the low and crit thresholds, which should give a notification. Also, I'm getting a slightly weird output from the debug when using only percentage, it seems to drop from 19% to 6% all of a sudden. The computer also has trouble hibernating but that I blame on the debugging, since when doing the same thing without debug it hibernates fine. I'm attaching part of this log, if anybody's interested (which also shows failed hibernation attempts and percentage going down to 0% [which seems to upset gpm a bit]) @Chad Bernier: Holding out until I buy a new laptop. ** Attachment added: gpm.debug.log2excerpt.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13126675/gpm.debug.log2excerpt.txt -- [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135548 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. ** Attachment added: unnamed http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13127819/unnamed -- [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135548 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 201330] Re: Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting
well it is your fault for buying a laptop with incompatible hardware. people should be more careful. I didn't just get any bluetooth adapter at walmart, i bought a highly reviewed, linux compatible one. On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Travis Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The X300 is also one that is known to have problems with the open source driver so we're screwed either way there. -- Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. ** Attachment added: unnamed http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13080666/unnamed -- Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196417] Re: vlc pulseaudio support
how do you get the new pulse audio to work? It doesn't show up in the audio output list. -- vlc pulseaudio support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196417 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 201330] Re: Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting
how do you get a mobility card installed into a desktop? aren't they different sizes and connectors? On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Eduardo Jose Moreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a desktop, not a laptop, with an ATI Radeon 9600 XT Mobility (card bought separately, it was cheap). Please whitelist it, worked ok with Compiz in Gutsy (and PC is not a laptop). Now after removing Gutsy and installing Hardy beta it still uses free radeon driver with Normal effects (Compiz works ok, it's what came after the install). But Hardy tries to install the fglrx driver when I click Extra effects. Ugh. No need to do that, free driver works ok for this card. So now I have no extra effects. Anyway, thanks for your efforts, they are really appreciated no matter what comes out of this. lspci -vnn attached: 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc M10 NQ [Radeon Mobility 9600] [1002:4e51] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) 02:00.1 Display controller [0380]: ATI Technologies Inc M10 NQ [Radeon Mobility 9600] (Secondary) [1002:4e71] Note: card has 3 outputs: VGA, DVI and TV-out. VGA and DVI are detected separately in lspci -vnn (VGA is primary, DVI is secondary). TV-out seems not detected, no problem, I don't need it. ** Attachment added: lspci-vnn.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12846235/lspci-vnn.txt -- Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 188540] Re: firefox-3.0 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()
nothing new there. flash has been unstable for months. We can only hope that Adobe fixes it soon. On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Jovan Svorcan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tish usually happens while I'm watching youtube. -- firefox-3.0 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188540 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- firefox-3.0 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
did you try to load the module first? sudo modprobe dm-raid4-5 or something like that. On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Stavros Korokithakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running the Hardy beta at the moment and I can confirm that it doesn't work. This is my output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ sudo dmraid -va y ERROR: device-mapper target type raid45 not in kernel INFO: Activating GROUP RAID set isw_bfjhhhjjib -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 201330] Re: Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting
I vote that they unblacklist the working ones first. that's top priority. after that people can worry about trying to fix the drivers, but that is a big project. On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Timo Jyrinki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @Sergio: Ubuntu does not recommend using closed source drivers, so fglrx should never be the default option, or something that is used to provide 3D desktop when the open source driver would also work. That said, fglrx also has very poor reputation regarding stability, functionality (eg. compiz) or being able to support suspend/hibernation. Since it's closed source, it cannot be fixed either. -- Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201330] Re: Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting
well a lot of people have said it, but ok. ** Attachment added: lspci-vn http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12662713/lspci-vn -- Need to whitelist multiple ATI cards, or remove blacklisting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 188540] Re: firefox-3.0 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()
yea it is flash. flash hasn't been stable on linux for many months. we have been waiting for adobe to release an update. silverlight doesn't matter, people aren't going to rewrite everything already written. besides, linux people hate microsoft products. On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Trabuco007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interestingly, it did not crash yesterday when I was using ATI`s driver (fglrx). Now I'm using vesa and it keeps crashing. (I'm using vesa now for other reasons...) I don't know whose problem is it, but if it's Flash's, then Adobe should wake up and smell the coffee because Microsoft will release Silverlight 2 for Linux really soon (and Microsoft means business!). More info: == [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fglrxinfo display: :0.0 screen: 0 OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect OpenGL version string: 1.4 (2.1 Mesa 7.0.3) --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82946GZ/PL/GL Memory Controller Hub (rev 02) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82946GZ/PL/GL PCI Express Root Port (rev 02) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 01) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 01) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 01) 00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 01) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 01) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev e1) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801GB/GR (ICH7 Family) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 01) 00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) IDE Controller (rev 01) 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801GB/GR/GH (ICH7 Family) SATA IDE Controller (rev 01) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 01) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV630 [Radeon HD 2600 Series] 01:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc RV630/M76 audio device [Radeon HD 2600 Series] 02:01.0 Network controller: RaLink RT2561/RT61 rev B 802.11g 02:02.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Audigy LS 02:03.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8001 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 14) == -- firefox-3.0 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188540 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- firefox-3.0 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197135] Re: need to blacklist xpress200m when using ati driver
I will not let you blacklist my laptop. I have been using compiz on this since before compiz has even in ubuntu. Sure they are problems sometimes, but they get fixed. How do i un blacklist it? i will not be updating my computer until i know how to reverse this. I am completely dependent on compiz, I use AWN for everything, i have no gnome-panel. -- need to blacklist xpress200m when using ati driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197135 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201330] Re: Need to whitelist ATI radeon IGP 340M
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW [Radeon Mobility 7500] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) mine works fine most of the time. i won't be applying the patch until i know how to overide it. please let me know. I don't use gnome-panel, i use AWN. I can't launch any programs, not even a terminal without compiz. -- Need to whitelist ATI radeon IGP 340M https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201330 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 183685] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
it has been fixed for me for like a week or something. i am still having trouble with firefox though. On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:38 PM, rah003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will do as soon as I get it again. I've thrown away previous report since it was known thing and I didn't know that you will mark it as fixed few minutes later :) Cheers -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 22007] Re: no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
question. what is there to stop someone else from taking someone's unlicensed work, adding their own license to it, and calling it theirs? how do you prove copyright in cases like this? On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Conrad Knauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adding to what Reinhard Tartler said, it is my understanding that copyright remains with the author unless they specifically renounce it (e.g. 'I release this work into the public domain'). What you quoted is basically that the author has given you permission to distribute a 64-bit version of the program. He doesn't explicitly extend that to others and doesn't (appear to) give you permission to alter it further. Like I said, 'freeware' as it stands right now. You should contact the author (the sooner the better!) and discuss what license they would like their software under. These links might help: http://www.opensource.org/licenses http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html (see the chart) -- no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188540] Re: firefox-3.0 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc()
it crashes on youtube frequently -- firefox-3.0 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_alloc() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 135548] Re: [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression
good, you always should reboot. linux will let you reboot just the relevant portion of the system, but only if you know how. Why do you want it to suspend on low power? It will just continue to draw power in suspend mode. It'll then turn off without shutting down properly. I'd rather set the limits lower and use hibernate mode. It's not like the computer can do anything useful while suspended. I pretty much never use suspend because it stops downloads. On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:49 AM, ThomasNovin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've written in my duplicate bug that the workaround with use_time_for_policy did not work for me. This was only true before I had rebooted. Now I got notification about low power, critical power and then also a automatic suspend. Wow! :) -- [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135548 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135548 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 183685] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
it has been fixed for me for like a week or something. i am still having trouble with firefox though. On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:38 PM, rah003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will do as soon as I get it again. I've thrown away previous report since it was known thing and I didn't know that you will mark it as fixed few minutes later :) Cheers -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183685] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
here is a weird one. I load up a video in VLC, fine. I make it full screen, fine. I set it back to windowed mode, and it crashes instantly. when it's triggered this way, there is no crash report. -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183685] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
Thank you for reporting that. You are not the first person to notice this, but you are the first to say so in this bug. Hardy has been under a much higher load all the time for me, just using firefox, flash, and compiz keeps this thinkpad r51 quite busy. Earlier versions of ubuntu ran just fine, usually the CPU was throttled down, and I got much longer battery life. Hardy needs to be updated everyday, even twice a day, which stresses it alot too. I first want the compuz fixed, than i hope they reduce resource usage. I won't be buying a new laptop until I really need it. I bought the thinkpad because they don't break, so it could be awhile. -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183685] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
the lastest update appears to have helped. Before that update, it crashed randomly, as evidenced by everyone else above. After the update, it has crashed for me twice, both times at the same time firefox crashed. We'll see how that goes. I wish i could get firefox to stop crashing. also, since the last updates of compiz and AWN, awn comes right back up properly once compiz is restarted. -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131885] Re: Backlight no longer under my control on battery
I've had this bug in gutsy and it is still in Hardy. I have a IBM thinkpad r51. I don't mind it dimming my backlight on battery. However, sometimes I want it brighter while on battery, and it should be my choice. I override it with the buttons on the laptop, but it only stays brighter for a couple minutes. I don't want it getting dimmer on idle. People watch movies and stuff. If the computer goes idle, it should go totally black, and I'm pretty sure it does do that. there aren't any backlight settings in the power manager. sometimes i plug the computer in just to get the brighter screen, when it should be my choice to use the battery faster. -- Backlight no longer under my control on battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183685] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
I spoke too soon. it crashed again today. I was just using firefox as normal and it crashed. a crashed compiz really messed up my AWN. -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 183685] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV
Compiz crashed several times a day for me when I installed Hardy a few days ago. That's how I found this bug. However, it has been updated a couple times since then. Compiz has not crashed at all today or yesterday. I currently have no real problems with hardy. I would like a more stable flash plugin, but that's a whole different issue. hardy is pretty much the same as Gutsy was. -- compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
I would be trying to get this fixed too, but I still don't have the hardware, or know when I'll be getting it. They told me they'd try to have it done in gutsy. I doubt Hardy will get it, because they will be concentrating on stability. It could be a long way a ways. You have a couple of choices. You can try custom compiling and all that goodness. Or, you could try Fedora or something. If it were me, I'd install the Hardy development version, and be constantly fiddling with it trying to get the raid to work. I am more comfortable than you though. You can leave XP in a dual boot in the meantime, until you're confident things are working well. On Nov 30, 2007 7:23 AM, lreinecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all! Is there any chance Ubuntu/dmraid supporting fakeRAID5 soon? The bug was reported a half year ago but Gutsy still doesn't seem to support it. I'm new to Linux so I don't like the idea of building my own kernel as a first thing... Nontheless I really want to leave XP... -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135548] Re: [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression
So that's any easy fix. Just switch it to default to percentages rather than percent. Is there something wrong with that? IT's probably easier than fixing the time reported issue. mine is now set to be critical at 3 and hibernate at 2%, the default percentages. Seeing how i get somewhere between 2-3 minutes per percent when using my big battery, and light load as typical, and I don't use the small one often, this seems very reasonable. I can't believe one check box fixes this problem, yet no fix has been released. Now i have to fix my bad attempt at fixing this problem. My computer has been hibernating itself very often, haha. -- [Gutsy] Action on critical battery isn't triggered - regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135548 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144501] Re: iwl3945.ko missing
just look at them. you kernel is 2.6.22-13.40 and your modules are 2.6.22-13.33 anyways, the modules load for me now, but don't bind to my network card. I guess I'm stuck with ipw2200? how do i get a module for ipw2200 that doesn't cause sleep problems? -- iwl3945.ko missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144501 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144501] Re: iwl3945.ko missing
nice try kyle, but that doesn't work. [41600.328000] ieee80211_init: failed to initialize WME (err=-17) [41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rx_irqsafe [41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_get_hdrlen [41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_iwlwifi_ieee80211_tx_status_irqsafe [41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_iwlwifi_ieee80211_stop_queues [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_tx_status [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rate_control_unregister [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_stop_queue [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_sta_info_put [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_free_hw [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_beacon_get [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_sta_info_get [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_alloc_hw [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_scan_completed [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_register_hw [41600.364000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_wake_queue [41600.364000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rate_control_register [41600.364000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_iwlwifi_ieee80211_register_hwmode [41600.364000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_unregister_hw [41600.364000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_start_queues -- iwl3945.ko missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144501 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144501] Re: iwl3945.ko missing
I don't use ipw3945, I use ipw2200. is iwl3945 still a replacement for it? Sorry about that double post, it must have been post data or something. how come modules is at version 32 and the kernel is at version 39? -- iwl3945.ko missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144501 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144501] Re: iwl3945.ko missing
nice try kyle, but that doesn't work. [41600.328000] ieee80211_init: failed to initialize WME (err=-17) [41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rx_irqsafe [41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_get_hdrlen [41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_iwlwifi_ieee80211_tx_status_irqsafe [41600.356000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_iwlwifi_ieee80211_stop_queues [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_tx_status [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rate_control_unregister [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_stop_queue [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_sta_info_put [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_free_hw [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_beacon_get [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_sta_info_get [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_alloc_hw [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_scan_completed [41600.36] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_register_hw [41600.364000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_wake_queue [41600.364000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rate_control_register [41600.364000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_iwlwifi_ieee80211_register_hwmode [41600.364000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_unregister_hw [41600.364000] iwl3945: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_start_queues -- iwl3945.ko missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144501 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137443] Re: display brightness resets and flashes on IBM T23 in Gutsy
same thing happens to me on my thinkpad r51. I'm also having problems with suspend and resume. -- display brightness resets and flashes on IBM T23 in Gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110427] Re: dmraid set won't activate
I can't help you with this bug anymore. The computer was not mine and had to be returned to its owner. The owner will just have to live without it for now. It was using nvraid, but you already know that. I don't have the computer with me to look up mobo model number or anything. I did try compiling those modules, but they wouldn't load either. -- dmraid set won't activate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106177] Re: make dmraid play nice with udev
I don't really need this patch right now, how do i remove it? -- make dmraid play nice with udev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110427] Re: dmraid set won't activate
Something is wrong. I deleted all the modules in that directly after backing them up, and added your new ones. I rebooted into the current kernel as stated. I reboot the computer. It takes a long time, complains about the lack of raid45, io buffer errors, and end of device, as usual. I manually try to load the dm-raid4-5 module to see if that works before checking to see if its in the initrd. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/lib/modules/2.6.20-15-generic/kernel/drivers/md$ modprobe dm-raid4-5 FATAL: Module dm_raid4_5 not found. running update-modules doesn't help at all. I try manually loading the module directly incase it's just having trouble finding it. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/lib/modules/2.6.20-15-generic/kernel/drivers/md$ sudo insmod dm-raid4-5.ko insmod: error inserting 'dm-raid4-5.ko': -1 Invalid module format So i can't get the module loaded. -- dmraid set won't activate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110427] Re: dmraid set won't activate
haha, sorry, tormod, but i failed to mention that I'm using x86_64. I bet you gave me x86 modules. You should have asked though :) -- dmraid set won't activate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
Yes, i know it can be done, I've heard of that awhile ago. I don't think the Ubuntu installer is very good at that yet. You'll probably have to manually create a bunch of partitions and everything. I haven't been able to play with software raid myself because I always needed windows on my desktops. If you look around the internet, you should be able to find a guide. -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110427] Re: dmraid set won't activate
certainly. just check out this bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/97655 It has the two patches and a discussion about it. -- dmraid set won't activate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
Lesley, I'm not sure if you can get the boot to work or not, but that isn't your only option. You could simple use an additional Hard drive to boot from, and keep all your data on the raid5 array. That's what I'm attempting to do with this computer as it simplifies the installation of any OS. You won't have redundancy on your OS, but do you really need that? You can just set up a cron job or something to automatically backup your boot drive to the array anyways. The downside is you'll need to get another drive and have room in your case for it. I don't know if that's a deal breaker for you. -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110427] Re: dmraid set won't activate
No, that is unmountable. It complains that it isn't a valid block device. I would love to try using the standard kernel with only the needed modules changed. However, that is a bit too advanced for me, so you'll have to provide instructions. If i just copied them over, it would complain about wrong versions, because for who knows what reasons, the version numbers of the source never matches the kernel image. -- dmraid set won't activate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
Oh yea, Tom, your livecd doesn't work for me. First, a small comment. It would be better if you included dm-raid4-5 on the initrd so people don't have to manually load it, quick fix. Secondly, I loaded the module, all went fine. dmraid -s shows my array just fine. But when i run dmraid -ay, nothing happens. the process hangs. After a few minutes and attempts to kill the running process, the whole computer freezes up. Even before then, a new terminal window can not be opened. I did this twice. -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
Yea i figured something like a HTPC might have space limitations. Lesley, unfortunately, the only way to do what you described involves giving up Windows. I have assumed you want windows along with Ubuntu on your PC, because you are using dmraid. If you won't be installing windows, you don't need fake raid at all. you can use software raid already built into linux. That will allow you to set up a raid 0 and raid 5 on the same array, pretty cool :) -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
Thank you Tom for doing this for us and for Ubuntu. I hope someone picks up my other bugs, because my raid set won't activate properly. lesley, It sounds like you want to BOOT off your raid5. That isn't going to happen, not anytime soon. I hope you can get it working as a data drive though. To be able to boot of raid5, first the initrd needs to be fixed to include dmraid in it and whatnot. After that's done though, grub still needs to be patched. I might be wrong, but I am under the impression that Grub cannot boot off a raid5 array, although it will work on a raid0. I hope I'm wrong about that, and full raid5 support can be added to gutsy, and will be included in FC7. -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110427] Re: dmraid set won't activate
Is this related to udev? everything else seems to be working right. -- dmraid set won't activate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
I decided to test the live cd. That'll tell me if there is a problem with the module or dmraid, or if i screwed something up with udev, right? -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
take something out of the CD, maybe Open office. It can be installed after the install. I'd rather be missing something than waste a DVD. -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
I got past those problems and am having different ones now, as my bug reports show. you are still getting the raid45 error? Are you certain that the dm- raid4-5 module is compiled AND loaded? -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
Richard, i made the sim link and put the module in the initrd, along with the dm-raid4-5 module and there is no longer a problem of that error. I still get some hangs in the boot process but they are probably related to something else. -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
he didn't respond when i tried contacting him, maybe he'll listen to you. I'm using an nvidia chipset. I took his 2.6.18 patch and applied it to a 2.6.19 kernel. it patched everything except one file, which i manually fixed. That worked, but i want to use a 2.6.20 kernel. It stopped working in that kernel at some point, but i since fixed dmraid, so maybe it'll work. i removed the kernel, but still have the deb files. I'll reinstall the kernel and see if it's at least working with that one. -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106177] Re: make dmraid play nice with udev
I hope they fix it this time. You can't see what else is going on because those messages flood the system. -- make dmraid play nice with udev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
it is not working anymore. This must be a bug in dmraid or something. thanks for the patch. -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110427] dmraid set won't activate
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dmraid I'm not entirely sure if this is a dmraid bug or not. I finally fixed the problems of kernel modules. I have two custom kernels, 2.6.19 with the 2.6.18 dmraid45 patch, and 2.6.20 with the dmraid45 patch provided by Mandriva. I have no reason to beleive that this module is causing a problem. The raid set used to work using an older version of dmraid that i compiled because the edgy version wasn't sufficient. I'm using feisty now. here's the problem. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/jp# dmraid -ay -v -d DEBUG: _find_set: searching nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: not found nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: searching nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: not found nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: searching nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: found nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: searching nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: found nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: searching nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: found nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: searching nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: found nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: searching nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: found nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: searching nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: _find_set: found nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: checking nvidia device /dev/sda DEBUG: checking nvidia device /dev/sdc DEBUG: checking nvidia device /dev/sdd DEBUG: checking nvidia device /dev/sdb DEBUG: set status of set nvidia_edjdcidj to 16 RAID set nvidia_edjdcidj already active INFO: Activating raid5_ls RAID set nvidia_edjdcidj ERROR: opening /dev/.static/dev/mapper/nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: freeing devices of RAID set nvidia_edjdcidj DEBUG: freeing device nvidia_edjdcidj, path /dev/sda DEBUG: freeing device nvidia_edjdcidj, path /dev/sdc DEBUG: freeing device nvidia_edjdcidj, path /dev/sdd DEBUG: freeing device nvidia_edjdcidj, path /dev/sdb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/jp# ls /dev/.static/dev/m mapper/ midi00 midi03 midi3 mixer2 mpu401stat mem midi01 midi1 mixer mixer3 midi0 midi02 midi2 mixer1 mpu401data [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/jp# ls /dev/.static/dev/mapper/ nvidia_edjdcidj1 nvidia_edjdcidj2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/jp# ls /dev/mapper/ control nvidia_edjdcidj [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/jp# as you can see, it tries to open a device that doesn't exist, although the partitions on that device exist. Then, in the directory where everything should exist, the device exists, but the partitions don't. Nothing can be mounted. ** Affects: dmraid (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- dmraid set won't activate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110427 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106177] Re: make dmraid play nice with udev
I'm not exactly sure what problem your patches are trying to fix. I applied them anyways. I was hoping it would get rid of this problem. I keep getting a ton of messages that look like this. attempt to access beyond end of device. any idea on how to fix those? -- make dmraid play nice with udev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
i don't think this is a problem with the raid45 patch right? -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110089] missing dmraid devices
Public bug reported: I've been working with the developer's to test the proposed dmraid support in gutsy. So far i have fixed dmraid complaining about no raid5 support by following these two bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/102973 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/97655 and i have followed this bug too. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/106177 There is still a problem though and I'm not sure what is causing it. my raid partitions show up in /dev/.static/dev/mapper, but they are useless here. They do not show up where they belong in /dev/mapper. re-running dmraid -ay results in this RAID set nvidia_edjdcidj already active ERROR: opening /dev/.static/dev/mapper/nvidia_edjdcidj (which doesn't exist, nvidia_edjdcidj1 and nvidia_edjdcidj2 do) ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- missing dmraid devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
i tried to compile it into the kernel. I think it must be left as a module. I got it to compile as a module, but it still isn't working. Dmraid is hanging as the other bug states. I still get a lot of errors about the actual drives but that's another problem too. more to the actual point. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/dev/.static/dev/mapper# dmraid -ay RAID set nvidia_edjdcidj already active ERROR: opening /dev/.static/dev/mapper/nvidia_edjdcidj i get this error when trying to activate the raid. The devices do not show up in /dev/mapper/ even though it says the set is active. -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
Bishen, why are you using an old kernel and do you have the patch to enable raid5? I know we are trying to fix dmraid, but that isn't sufficient for raid5. -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
thank you for making that effort Tom. I tried finding that patch myself but it didn't work. Guess what? It still doesn't work. Here's what happens when I try to build it. I hope the patch only needs minor corrections. CC drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.o drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c: In function ‘wake_do_raid_delayed’: drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c:542: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘cancel_delayed_work’ from incompatible pointer type drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c:545: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘queue_delayed_work’ from incompatible pointer type drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c: In function ‘raid_set_check_and_degrade’: drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c:735: warning: format ‘%llu’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘sector_t’ drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c: In function ‘do_recovery’: drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c:2599: warning: format ‘%llu’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘sector_t’ drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c: In function ‘rs_workqueue_init’: drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c:3168: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c: In function ‘dev_parms’: drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c:3230: warning: format ‘%llu’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int *’, but argument 3 has type ‘sector_t *’ drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c:3230: warning: format ‘%llu’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int *’, but argument 3 has type ‘sector_t *’ drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c: In function ‘raid_devel_stats’: drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c:3731: warning: format ‘%llu’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘region_t’ drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c:3731: warning: format ‘%llu’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 6 has type ‘region_t’ drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c:3731: warning: format ‘%llu’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 7 has type ‘region_t’ drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c: In function ‘raid_status’: drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.c:3789: warning: format ‘%llu’ expects type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘sector_t’ CC drivers/md/dm-mem-cache.o CC drivers/md/dm-region_hash.o LD drivers/md/built-in.o drivers/md/dm-mem-cache.o: In function `pl_elem': /usr/src/linux/drivers/md/dm-mem-cache.h:20: multiple definition of `pl_elem' drivers/md/dm-raid4-5.o:/usr/src/linux/drivers/md/dm-mem-cache.h:20: first defined here make[3]: *** [drivers/md/built-in.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [drivers/md] Error 2 make[1]: *** [drivers] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.20' make: *** [debian/stamp-build-kernel] Error 2 -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
But raid456 is already in the kernel. dmraid is having some kind of other trouble. What is causing the 4 minute delay? I had everything working in Edgy just fine. I had to compile the newest dmraid, and a kernel, but it was working. now its broke in feisty. by the time the feisty +1 is ready for testing, even alpha stage will take a few weeks to be usable, I'd have abandoned Ubuntu to see if Fedora Core works. -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
i tried this yesterday and it broke the computer worse. If i go back to the lab today, I can try getting the computer to boot, otherwise we have a serious problem. -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
Ok, it's not really any more broken than before. The computer does work minus the raid of course. It still has the annoying 4 minute delay during boot though. I tried both the official and your version. I even made sure to do a complete uninstall between versions. I even updated the initramd for all my kernels. I tried my feisty kernel and my custom kernel. i tried with modules loaded and unloaded. The only difference between your version and the official version is the official version says raid45 not found and yours says raid456 is not found. You're probably celebrating Easter. Hope we can fix this soon though. -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
yea i forgot, i have plenty of reasons to go back to campus this weekend. I'll test this today. just wish i had the dm-raid4-5 patch though. however, the bug has been confirmed and added to the wishlist, so here's hoping it makes it into fesity. maybe fesity +1 can have support in the installer, and be bootable, but that's really wishful thinking and not a good idea seeing how it's in alpha and all and just complicates everything. I would personally love raid5 bootable support for myself, but don't have a computer with an array in it yet, this one is for someone else who decided to use a separate boot drive since its a lot easier and more possible. I could probably wait 2 releases though. besides, maybe by then we won't even need dmraid. maybe i would kick windows off the drives natively :) -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
http://people.redhat.com/~heinzm/sw/dm/dm-raid45/ This is where the patch for 2.6.18 is located. I need someone to rewrite the patch for kernel 2.6.20, as the author hasn't done so yet. -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
Can I please have the x86_64 version of that package? Nox, you won't be able to get a raid5 array working with just this package. I'd love the package though because there are other problems. to get a raid 5 array working, you also need the dm-raid4-5.ko module. Unfortunately, I can't find a patch set that allows this to be compiled with feisty's kernel. -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
Can I please have the x86_64 version of that package? Nox, you won't be able to get a raid5 array working with just this package. I'd love the package though because there are other problems. to get a raid 5 array working, you also need the dm-raid4-5.ko module. Unfortunately, I can't find a patch set that allows this to be compiled with feisty's kernel. -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/97655 This bug explains what's needed to get a Nvidia (and other chipset) fake raid 5 arrays working. -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102973] Re: dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456
thank you. Unfortunately I am not at home to celebrate the weekend with my friend Jack Daniel and some others. Hopefully i can get around to testing it this weekend, if not monday when I'm forced to go back to that computer. :) yea I had the dm-raid4-5 module working for 2.6.19 custom compiled, but can't do it anymore. They should package the module separately and put it in multiverse. once raid5 works easily for data, maybe other things can be patched up to allow booting! -- dmraid looking for raid45 when kernel uses raid456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] dmraid45 target please
Public bug reported: Can you please enable the dmraid45 patch? The one that creates dm- raid4-5.ko? I wouldn't mind resulting module being in a seperate deb file, if you won't include it with the kernel. It's extremely important. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- dmraid45 target please https://launchpad.net/bugs/97655 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
