[Bug 1612704] [NEW] package out of date
Public bug reported: This agent package is quite far out of date now. How can we get this updated to the latest? ** Affects: radosgw-agent (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1612704 Title: package out of date To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/radosgw-agent/+bug/1612704/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1611082] Re: Upgrading ceph-osd from Kilo to Mitaka "misses" /var/lib/ceph ownership change
I actually committed a fix for this. I hit this also myself. Here's the patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/345646/ for ceph-mon and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/345647/ for ceph-osd. Just be aware that if you have a lot of data in your cluster this could be extremely slow or fail. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611082 Title: Upgrading ceph-osd from Kilo to Mitaka "misses" /var/lib/ceph ownership change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1611082/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1611082] Re: Upgrading ceph-osd from Kilo to Mitaka "misses" /var/lib/ceph ownership change
I agree with you Ed. The package should ensure this. The charm fix is a band-aid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611082 Title: Upgrading ceph-osd from Kilo to Mitaka "misses" /var/lib/ceph ownership change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1611082/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1564625] Re: aa-complain exits 0 when path not found
So I dug into this with pydb and figured out what's going on. utils/apparmor/tools.py lines 79 and 81 need to be changed to fatal_error(message). I tried both fatal_error and also sys.exit(1) and aa-complain seems to ignore it and still exit 0. I'm not exactly sure why though. It seems there's a custom sys exit handler in place that is messing with it. Does anyone know what I should change it to? I'll put in the change and the merge request :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564625 Title: aa-complain exits 0 when path not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1564625/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1604501] Re: ceph-osd fails to initialize when encrypt is enabled
Upstream tracker: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16755 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604501 Title: ceph-osd fails to initialize when encrypt is enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1604501/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1564625] [NEW] aa-complain exits 0 when path not found
Public bug reported: I'm using juju to deploy apparmor profiles and I've found that when the apparmor path isn't found the command still exists 0. If this exited with a non zero status I could detect I had a problem in my code and take action :) root@ip-172-31-29-100:/etc/apparmor.d/local# aa-complain foo Can't find foo in the system path list. If the name of the application is correct, please run 'which foo' as a user with correct PATH environment set up in order to find the fully-qualified path and use the full path as parameter. root@ip-172-31-29-100:/etc/apparmor.d/local# echo $? 0 Some context on the environment: root@ip-172-31-29-100:/etc/apparmor.d/local# cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS \n \l ** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: trusty ** Tags added: trusty ** Description changed: I'm using juju to deploy apparmor profiles and I've found that when the apparmor path isn't found the command still exists 0. If this exited with a non zero status I could detect I had a problem in my code and take action :) root@ip-172-31-29-100:/etc/apparmor.d/local# aa-complain foo Can't find foo in the system path list. If the name of the application is correct, please run 'which foo' as a user with correct PATH environment set up in order to find the fully-qualified path and use the full path as parameter. root@ip-172-31-29-100:/etc/apparmor.d/local# echo $? 0 + + Some context on the environment: + root@ip-172-31-29-100:/etc/apparmor.d/local# cat /etc/issue + Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS \n \l -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564625 Title: aa-complain exits 0 when path not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1564625/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1447858] Re: OSD weight should be the TB capacity of the drive
James - Yeah I ran that prestart command on my local box. It's showing the .001 per GB capacity. That's more accurate than I was going for which is great. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447858 Title: OSD weight should be the TB capacity of the drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1447858/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1447858] Re: OSD weight should be the TB capacity of the drive
James - Yeah I ran that prestart command on my local box. It's showing the .001 per GB capacity. That's more accurate than I was going for which is great. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447858 Title: OSD weight should be the TB capacity of the drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1447858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 696888] Re: No Sound Intel 5 Series/3400 Series HD Audio
** Also affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696888 Title: No Sound Intel 5 Series/3400 Series HD Audio -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
