[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Not invalid. Please don't take that jobsworth attitude with me. There is no good reason why the option should be restricted only to command- line actions. That something stupid is documented doesn't make it any less stupid. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: azureus As of 2.5.0.4-1ubuntu3~gutsy1, the JRE dependencies for azureus are "icedtea-java7-jre | sun-java6-jre | sun-java5-jre". Previous versions depended on "java-gcj-compat | java2-runtime" java2-runtime is a virtual package name provided by packages which grab Sun binaries, third-party packages (such as gij and kaffe), and packages created with the java-package tool, and probably should be used in place of specific package names. ** Affects: azureus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
not "invalid" ** Changed in: azureus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
I am using Sun Java 6 and being prompted to install Icedtea 7. Those using
java-package to turn the Sun binaries into real packages as opposed to using
sun-java6-jre (et al.) dummy packages, which IIRC contain a post-install script
to download and install the Sun binaries, will find themselves (barring a major
modification to java-package's complex maze of scripts) with packages called
sun-j2re1.6 or sun-j2sdk1.6. The latter provides the following virtuals:
* java-virtual-machine
* java-runtime
* java2-runtime
* java-browser-plugin
* java-compiler
* java2-compiler
* j2sdk1.6
* j2re1.6
I presume the former to be the same, sans the -compiler and j2sdk1.6
virtuals. If none are suitable, please add sun-j2re{5,6} and sun-
j2sdk{5,6} as dependencies.
--
Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
Is "cannot" a matter of being contrary to policy, or does including such references break the repository to the point where installations will fail? I would agree that code-wise this is an issue with java-package, however, the work required to bring java-package into line is several orders of magnitude greater. The sun-java6-jre package (IIRC) involves downloading the binary from Sun after the dummy package is installed, so _inclusion_ of the packages in repositories is not an option. The two methods currently use conflicting numbering schemes - java-package generates 1.6.x version numbers, while the Ubuntu dummies are numbered 6.0.x. Because of the differences, an "upgrade" from one to the other will cause problems, so a new package name will need to be devised - I am guessing that this in itself is a scary process. Notwithstanding the package naming issues, I will file this against java-package too. I would attempt a fix myself, but last time I read those scripts my head exploded. FWIW, I believe I may have successfully run 2.5 (or was it 2.4?) under gij/gcj, but this was long enough ago that I can't reliably recall. Will test this at a later date. Any alternative solutions in the interim (short of evil --force options) that would allow the upgrade? -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] [NEW] aptitude does not honour --download-only
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude The man page for aptitude claims: -d, --download-only : Download packages to the package cache as necessary, but do not install or remove anything. Every time I start aptitude (0.4.9-2ubuntu5) with either form of the option, once the download is complete it proceeds to install the downloaded packages. Steps to reproduce: * [sudo] aptitude -d [or --download-only] * Select packages to install * 'g' to review changes * 'g' to start download Expected result: packages are downloaded, return to selection screen Actual result: packages are downloaded, installation takes place ** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Nonsense - the same option should produce the same behaviour no matter how the program is started. -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Nonsense - the same option should produce the same behaviour no matter how the program is started. -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #477665 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477665 ** Also affects: aptitude (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477665 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250425] Re: zsnes crashes with buffer overflow on startup
Got the same problem in Intrepid final, Jeremy LaCroix's compile solved it. -- zsnes crashes with buffer overflow on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #477665 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477665 ** Also affects: aptitude (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477665 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] [NEW] aptitude does not honour --download-only
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude The man page for aptitude claims: -d, --download-only : Download packages to the package cache as necessary, but do not install or remove anything. Every time I start aptitude (0.4.9-2ubuntu5) with either form of the option, once the download is complete it proceeds to install the downloaded packages. Steps to reproduce: * [sudo] aptitude -d [or --download-only] * Select packages to install * 'g' to review changes * 'g' to start download Expected result: packages are downloaded, return to selection screen Actual result: packages are downloaded, installation takes place ** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Nonsense - the same option should produce the same behaviour no matter how the program is started. -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Nonsense - the same option should produce the same behaviour no matter how the program is started. -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: azureus As of 2.5.0.4-1ubuntu3~gutsy1, the JRE dependencies for azureus are "icedtea-java7-jre | sun-java6-jre | sun-java5-jre". Previous versions depended on "java-gcj-compat | java2-runtime" java2-runtime is a virtual package name provided by packages which grab Sun binaries, third-party packages (such as gij and kaffe), and packages created with the java-package tool, and probably should be used in place of specific package names. ** Affects: azureus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
not "invalid" ** Changed in: azureus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
I am using Sun Java 6 and being prompted to install Icedtea 7. Those using
java-package to turn the Sun binaries into real packages as opposed to using
sun-java6-jre (et al.) dummy packages, which IIRC contain a post-install script
to download and install the Sun binaries, will find themselves (barring a major
modification to java-package's complex maze of scripts) with packages called
sun-j2re1.6 or sun-j2sdk1.6. The latter provides the following virtuals:
* java-virtual-machine
* java-runtime
* java2-runtime
* java-browser-plugin
* java-compiler
* java2-compiler
* j2sdk1.6
* j2re1.6
I presume the former to be the same, sans the -compiler and j2sdk1.6
virtuals. If none are suitable, please add sun-j2re{5,6} and sun-
j2sdk{5,6} as dependencies.
--
Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
Is "cannot" a matter of being contrary to policy, or does including such references break the repository to the point where installations will fail? I would agree that code-wise this is an issue with java-package, however, the work required to bring java-package into line is several orders of magnitude greater. The sun-java6-jre package (IIRC) involves downloading the binary from Sun after the dummy package is installed, so _inclusion_ of the packages in repositories is not an option. The two methods currently use conflicting numbering schemes - java-package generates 1.6.x version numbers, while the Ubuntu dummies are numbered 6.0.x. Because of the differences, an "upgrade" from one to the other will cause problems, so a new package name will need to be devised - I am guessing that this in itself is a scary process. Notwithstanding the package naming issues, I will file this against java-package too. I would attempt a fix myself, but last time I read those scripts my head exploded. FWIW, I believe I may have successfully run 2.5 (or was it 2.4?) under gij/gcj, but this was long enough ago that I can't reliably recall. Will test this at a later date. Any alternative solutions in the interim (short of evil --force options) that would allow the upgrade? -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250425] Re: zsnes crashes with buffer overflow on startup
Got the same problem in Intrepid final, Jeremy LaCroix's compile solved it. -- zsnes crashes with buffer overflow on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Not invalid. Please don't take that jobsworth attitude with me. There is no good reason why the option should be restricted only to command- line actions. That something stupid is documented doesn't make it any less stupid. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Not invalid. Please don't take that jobsworth attitude with me. There is no good reason why the option should be restricted only to command- line actions. That something stupid is documented doesn't make it any less stupid. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] [NEW] aptitude does not honour --download-only
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude The man page for aptitude claims: -d, --download-only : Download packages to the package cache as necessary, but do not install or remove anything. Every time I start aptitude (0.4.9-2ubuntu5) with either form of the option, once the download is complete it proceeds to install the downloaded packages. Steps to reproduce: * [sudo] aptitude -d [or --download-only] * Select packages to install * 'g' to review changes * 'g' to start download Expected result: packages are downloaded, return to selection screen Actual result: packages are downloaded, installation takes place ** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Nonsense - the same option should produce the same behaviour no matter how the program is started. -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Nonsense - the same option should produce the same behaviour no matter how the program is started. -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: azureus As of 2.5.0.4-1ubuntu3~gutsy1, the JRE dependencies for azureus are "icedtea-java7-jre | sun-java6-jre | sun-java5-jre". Previous versions depended on "java-gcj-compat | java2-runtime" java2-runtime is a virtual package name provided by packages which grab Sun binaries, third-party packages (such as gij and kaffe), and packages created with the java-package tool, and probably should be used in place of specific package names. ** Affects: azureus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
not "invalid" ** Changed in: azureus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
I am using Sun Java 6 and being prompted to install Icedtea 7. Those using
java-package to turn the Sun binaries into real packages as opposed to using
sun-java6-jre (et al.) dummy packages, which IIRC contain a post-install script
to download and install the Sun binaries, will find themselves (barring a major
modification to java-package's complex maze of scripts) with packages called
sun-j2re1.6 or sun-j2sdk1.6. The latter provides the following virtuals:
* java-virtual-machine
* java-runtime
* java2-runtime
* java-browser-plugin
* java-compiler
* java2-compiler
* j2sdk1.6
* j2re1.6
I presume the former to be the same, sans the -compiler and j2sdk1.6
virtuals. If none are suitable, please add sun-j2re{5,6} and sun-
j2sdk{5,6} as dependencies.
--
Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
Is "cannot" a matter of being contrary to policy, or does including such references break the repository to the point where installations will fail? I would agree that code-wise this is an issue with java-package, however, the work required to bring java-package into line is several orders of magnitude greater. The sun-java6-jre package (IIRC) involves downloading the binary from Sun after the dummy package is installed, so _inclusion_ of the packages in repositories is not an option. The two methods currently use conflicting numbering schemes - java-package generates 1.6.x version numbers, while the Ubuntu dummies are numbered 6.0.x. Because of the differences, an "upgrade" from one to the other will cause problems, so a new package name will need to be devised - I am guessing that this in itself is a scary process. Notwithstanding the package naming issues, I will file this against java-package too. I would attempt a fix myself, but last time I read those scripts my head exploded. FWIW, I believe I may have successfully run 2.5 (or was it 2.4?) under gij/gcj, but this was long enough ago that I can't reliably recall. Will test this at a later date. Any alternative solutions in the interim (short of evil --force options) that would allow the upgrade? -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #477665 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477665 ** Also affects: aptitude (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477665 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250425] Re: zsnes crashes with buffer overflow on startup
Got the same problem in Intrepid final, Jeremy LaCroix's compile solved it. -- zsnes crashes with buffer overflow on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] [NEW] aptitude does not honour --download-only
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude The man page for aptitude claims: -d, --download-only : Download packages to the package cache as necessary, but do not install or remove anything. Every time I start aptitude (0.4.9-2ubuntu5) with either form of the option, once the download is complete it proceeds to install the downloaded packages. Steps to reproduce: * [sudo] aptitude -d [or --download-only] * Select packages to install * 'g' to review changes * 'g' to start download Expected result: packages are downloaded, return to selection screen Actual result: packages are downloaded, installation takes place ** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Nonsense - the same option should produce the same behaviour no matter how the program is started. -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Nonsense - the same option should produce the same behaviour no matter how the program is started. -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #477665 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477665 ** Also affects: aptitude (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477665 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: azureus As of 2.5.0.4-1ubuntu3~gutsy1, the JRE dependencies for azureus are "icedtea-java7-jre | sun-java6-jre | sun-java5-jre". Previous versions depended on "java-gcj-compat | java2-runtime" java2-runtime is a virtual package name provided by packages which grab Sun binaries, third-party packages (such as gij and kaffe), and packages created with the java-package tool, and probably should be used in place of specific package names. ** Affects: azureus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
not "invalid" ** Changed in: azureus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
I am using Sun Java 6 and being prompted to install Icedtea 7. Those using
java-package to turn the Sun binaries into real packages as opposed to using
sun-java6-jre (et al.) dummy packages, which IIRC contain a post-install script
to download and install the Sun binaries, will find themselves (barring a major
modification to java-package's complex maze of scripts) with packages called
sun-j2re1.6 or sun-j2sdk1.6. The latter provides the following virtuals:
* java-virtual-machine
* java-runtime
* java2-runtime
* java-browser-plugin
* java-compiler
* java2-compiler
* j2sdk1.6
* j2re1.6
I presume the former to be the same, sans the -compiler and j2sdk1.6
virtuals. If none are suitable, please add sun-j2re{5,6} and sun-
j2sdk{5,6} as dependencies.
--
Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
Is "cannot" a matter of being contrary to policy, or does including such references break the repository to the point where installations will fail? I would agree that code-wise this is an issue with java-package, however, the work required to bring java-package into line is several orders of magnitude greater. The sun-java6-jre package (IIRC) involves downloading the binary from Sun after the dummy package is installed, so _inclusion_ of the packages in repositories is not an option. The two methods currently use conflicting numbering schemes - java-package generates 1.6.x version numbers, while the Ubuntu dummies are numbered 6.0.x. Because of the differences, an "upgrade" from one to the other will cause problems, so a new package name will need to be devised - I am guessing that this in itself is a scary process. Notwithstanding the package naming issues, I will file this against java-package too. I would attempt a fix myself, but last time I read those scripts my head exploded. FWIW, I believe I may have successfully run 2.5 (or was it 2.4?) under gij/gcj, but this was long enough ago that I can't reliably recall. Will test this at a later date. Any alternative solutions in the interim (short of evil --force options) that would allow the upgrade? -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Not invalid. Please don't take that jobsworth attitude with me. There is no good reason why the option should be restricted only to command- line actions. That something stupid is documented doesn't make it any less stupid. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: azureus As of 2.5.0.4-1ubuntu3~gutsy1, the JRE dependencies for azureus are "icedtea-java7-jre | sun-java6-jre | sun-java5-jre". Previous versions depended on "java-gcj-compat | java2-runtime" java2-runtime is a virtual package name provided by packages which grab Sun binaries, third-party packages (such as gij and kaffe), and packages created with the java-package tool, and probably should be used in place of specific package names. ** Affects: azureus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
not "invalid" ** Changed in: azureus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
I am using Sun Java 6 and being prompted to install Icedtea 7. Those using
java-package to turn the Sun binaries into real packages as opposed to using
sun-java6-jre (et al.) dummy packages, which IIRC contain a post-install script
to download and install the Sun binaries, will find themselves (barring a major
modification to java-package's complex maze of scripts) with packages called
sun-j2re1.6 or sun-j2sdk1.6. The latter provides the following virtuals:
* java-virtual-machine
* java-runtime
* java2-runtime
* java-browser-plugin
* java-compiler
* java2-compiler
* j2sdk1.6
* j2re1.6
I presume the former to be the same, sans the -compiler and j2sdk1.6
virtuals. If none are suitable, please add sun-j2re{5,6} and sun-
j2sdk{5,6} as dependencies.
--
Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
Is "cannot" a matter of being contrary to policy, or does including such references break the repository to the point where installations will fail? I would agree that code-wise this is an issue with java-package, however, the work required to bring java-package into line is several orders of magnitude greater. The sun-java6-jre package (IIRC) involves downloading the binary from Sun after the dummy package is installed, so _inclusion_ of the packages in repositories is not an option. The two methods currently use conflicting numbering schemes - java-package generates 1.6.x version numbers, while the Ubuntu dummies are numbered 6.0.x. Because of the differences, an "upgrade" from one to the other will cause problems, so a new package name will need to be devised - I am guessing that this in itself is a scary process. Notwithstanding the package naming issues, I will file this against java-package too. I would attempt a fix myself, but last time I read those scripts my head exploded. FWIW, I believe I may have successfully run 2.5 (or was it 2.4?) under gij/gcj, but this was long enough ago that I can't reliably recall. Will test this at a later date. Any alternative solutions in the interim (short of evil --force options) that would allow the upgrade? -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250425] Re: zsnes crashes with buffer overflow on startup
Got the same problem in Intrepid final, Jeremy LaCroix's compile solved it. -- zsnes crashes with buffer overflow on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] [NEW] aptitude does not honour --download-only
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude The man page for aptitude claims: -d, --download-only : Download packages to the package cache as necessary, but do not install or remove anything. Every time I start aptitude (0.4.9-2ubuntu5) with either form of the option, once the download is complete it proceeds to install the downloaded packages. Steps to reproduce: * [sudo] aptitude -d [or --download-only] * Select packages to install * 'g' to review changes * 'g' to start download Expected result: packages are downloaded, return to selection screen Actual result: packages are downloaded, installation takes place ** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Nonsense - the same option should produce the same behaviour no matter how the program is started. -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Nonsense - the same option should produce the same behaviour no matter how the program is started. -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #477665 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477665 ** Also affects: aptitude (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477665 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Not invalid. Please don't take that jobsworth attitude with me. There is no good reason why the option should be restricted only to command- line actions. That something stupid is documented doesn't make it any less stupid. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] [NEW] aptitude does not honour --download-only
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude The man page for aptitude claims: -d, --download-only : Download packages to the package cache as necessary, but do not install or remove anything. Every time I start aptitude (0.4.9-2ubuntu5) with either form of the option, once the download is complete it proceeds to install the downloaded packages. Steps to reproduce: * [sudo] aptitude -d [or --download-only] * Select packages to install * 'g' to review changes * 'g' to start download Expected result: packages are downloaded, return to selection screen Actual result: packages are downloaded, installation takes place ** Affects: aptitude (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Nonsense - the same option should produce the same behaviour no matter how the program is started. -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Nonsense - the same option should produce the same behaviour no matter how the program is started. -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250425] Re: zsnes crashes with buffer overflow on startup
Got the same problem in Intrepid final, Jeremy LaCroix's compile solved it. -- zsnes crashes with buffer overflow on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: azureus As of 2.5.0.4-1ubuntu3~gutsy1, the JRE dependencies for azureus are "icedtea-java7-jre | sun-java6-jre | sun-java5-jre". Previous versions depended on "java-gcj-compat | java2-runtime" java2-runtime is a virtual package name provided by packages which grab Sun binaries, third-party packages (such as gij and kaffe), and packages created with the java-package tool, and probably should be used in place of specific package names. ** Affects: azureus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
not "invalid" ** Changed in: azureus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
I am using Sun Java 6 and being prompted to install Icedtea 7. Those using
java-package to turn the Sun binaries into real packages as opposed to using
sun-java6-jre (et al.) dummy packages, which IIRC contain a post-install script
to download and install the Sun binaries, will find themselves (barring a major
modification to java-package's complex maze of scripts) with packages called
sun-j2re1.6 or sun-j2sdk1.6. The latter provides the following virtuals:
* java-virtual-machine
* java-runtime
* java2-runtime
* java-browser-plugin
* java-compiler
* java2-compiler
* j2sdk1.6
* j2re1.6
I presume the former to be the same, sans the -compiler and j2sdk1.6
virtuals. If none are suitable, please add sun-j2re{5,6} and sun-
j2sdk{5,6} as dependencies.
--
Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174198] Re: Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al.
Is "cannot" a matter of being contrary to policy, or does including such references break the repository to the point where installations will fail? I would agree that code-wise this is an issue with java-package, however, the work required to bring java-package into line is several orders of magnitude greater. The sun-java6-jre package (IIRC) involves downloading the binary from Sun after the dummy package is installed, so _inclusion_ of the packages in repositories is not an option. The two methods currently use conflicting numbering schemes - java-package generates 1.6.x version numbers, while the Ubuntu dummies are numbered 6.0.x. Because of the differences, an "upgrade" from one to the other will cause problems, so a new package name will need to be devised - I am guessing that this in itself is a scary process. Notwithstanding the package naming issues, I will file this against java-package too. I would attempt a fix myself, but last time I read those scripts my head exploded. FWIW, I believe I may have successfully run 2.5 (or was it 2.4?) under gij/gcj, but this was long enough ago that I can't reliably recall. Will test this at a later date. Any alternative solutions in the interim (short of evil --force options) that would allow the upgrade? -- Missing dependency on java2-runtime et al. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #477665 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477665 ** Also affects: aptitude (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=477665 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216292] Re: aptitude does not honour --download-only
Not invalid. Please don't take that jobsworth attitude with me. There is no good reason why the option should be restricted only to command- line actions. That something stupid is documented doesn't make it any less stupid. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- aptitude does not honour --download-only https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250425] Re: zsnes crashes with buffer overflow on startup
Got the same problem in Intrepid final, Jeremy LaCroix's compile solved it. -- zsnes crashes with buffer overflow on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 226391] Re: snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180
On 13 Jul 2009 at 22:50, Leann Ogasawara wrote: > Hey Chris, > > Is this still an issue for you with Karmic? Thanks. > > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) >Status: New => Incomplete > > -- > snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of > the bug. There is no evidence attached to the bug report that says anything has been done to fix this problem. The problem is still there in fully up-to-date Xubuntu 9.04 (kernel 2.6.28-13-generic) - the workaround is to add "snd-sb16" to /etc/modules and the user must also be added to the "audio" group. If there were some evidence that the problem has been attended to, I might commit the not insignificant effort required to rearrange my disc space, download, install and test that prerelease version, but asking whether the problem is still an issue with no evidence of it having been fixed serves only to alienate. -- snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 217376] Re: kubuntu 8.04 beta alternative installer hangs
On 21 Feb 2009 at 18:20, Crewsr3 wrote: > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make > Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been any > activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue for > you. > > -- > kubuntu 8.04 beta alternative installer hangs > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217376 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of > the bug. No problem with 8.10. -- kubuntu 8.04 beta alternative installer hangs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217376 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 358781] Re: can't set background when graphics acceration is disabled
* Is this reproducible? No. I have reinstalled a copy of Ubuntu 9.04 and setup dual monitors (disabling graphics acceleration), and the background remains in tact. That bug somehow was setting desktop.gnome.background to false when I would start up the computer. * If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? I would say this bug magically disappeared with a reinstall and subsequent updates. * Could you take a screenshot showing the issue? As I have reinstalled Ubuntu and cannot reproduce I'm not able to. I would mark this bug as either "works-for-me" or invalid, as I'm not having issues with it now. Thanks ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- can't set background when graphics acceration is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 358781] [NEW] can't set background when graphics acceration is disabled
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch) Release:9.04 gnome: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1:2.22.2~4ubuntu6 Version table: 1:2.22.2~4ubuntu6 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages I am using dual monitors on a T60 thinkpad with the amd64 version of Ubuntu 9.04. I have an Intel 945GM video card that I can enable acceleration for 1 monitor, but with dual monitors I need to setup a virtual screen and disable hw acceleration. This also means desktop effects are disabled. After doing this, I expect to set a background picture using the Change Desktop Background menu by right-clicking on the Desktop. Instead, when I click on a picture, the background only changes to the particular color or gradient specified at the bottom of the preference window. ** Affects: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- can't set background when graphics acceration is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 358781] Re: can't set background when graphics acceration is disabled
Additional information: I enabled Desktop Effects again, and tried to set the background and still cannot set the background. -- can't set background when graphics acceration is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 358781] Re: can't set background when graphics acceration is disabled
I can fix this by changing a setting. If I open up gconf-editor and select desktop->gnome->background I noticed that it was false. After changing it to true, I now have a background. I didn't change this, I wonder what package has changed this value for me? -- can't set background when graphics acceration is disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226391] apport-collect data
Architecture: i386 CurrentDmesg: [ 36.176376] eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII#0 link partner capability of 45e1. [ 40.856092] eth0: no IPv6 routers present DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=498e489f-da8d-4c64-9a38-20c63fa3aea3 Lsusb: Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub MachineType: System Manufacturer System Name Package: linux-image-2.6.28-13-generic 2.6.28-13.45 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=d5001d4a-e6fd-4e06-aec0-84c0d61132af ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-13.45-generic Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare -- snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226391] Re: snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30458347/BootDmesg.txt -- snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226391] Re: snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30458348/Dependencies.txt -- snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226391] Re: snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180
** Attachment added: "HalComputerInfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30458349/HalComputerInfo.txt -- snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226391] Re: snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30458350/Lspci.txt -- snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226391] Re: snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30458351/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226391] Re: snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30458353/ProcModules.txt -- snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226391] Re: snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30458352/ProcInterrupts.txt -- snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 226391] Re: snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180
> Thanks Chris, > > Can you run the follwing: > > apport-collect -p linux-image-`uname -r` 226391 Done, but not without a great deal of trouble. It required installing python-launchpadlib and that installation, using synaptic, failed c.4 times, succeeding on the 5th - are dependencies set correctly? -- snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303709] [NEW] Installation does not set Freepascal source directory
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lazarus Appears to be the same as #126003 Please add package fpc-src But that bug is said to be fixed. Well it isn't fixed in Kubuntu/Xubuntu 8.10 (or current updates). BTW Just installing the missing package(s) isn't sufficient - the Lazarus IDE Environment Options FPC Source directory needs to be filled in (with /usr/share/fpcsrc/2.2.0/). Lazarus package version 0.9.24-0-9 BTW Launchpad is VERY slow (my broadband connection is fine) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Dependencies: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Package: lazarus None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/lazarus.list] PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 LANGUAGE=en_GB SourcePackage: lazarus Uname: Linux 2.6.27-7-generic i686 ** Affects: lazarus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Installation does not set Freepascal source directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 303709] Re: Installation does not set Freepascal source directory
> When I look at [1] I see that fpc-source (mind the name) is in the > recommends section of lazarus. As far as I can tell in (k|x|)ubuntu most > package manners pull in recommends automatically. What package manager do > you use, it looks like the behavior you experience is different from the > actual behavior? And can you give the output of "apt-cache show lazarus" > And please be clearer in which of the (two) bugs you like to report in > this report. Each separated bug should go in one report. You can reopen > bug 126003 again if you really think it is still/again open, but I tend to > think the problem lies elsewhere. Looking at the title of this report you > want to report here what is in your "BTW", ie some option in lazarus > should be pre-filled? Package managers: Adept on Kubuntu and Synaptic on Xubuntu. By Googling and trying various suggestions (read flailing around), I fixed the problem on Kubuntu (before putting in the bug report). However, my Xubuntu installation of Lazarus is "clean". The symptom is that Lazarus, when it starts up, displays a message box saying "The Free Pascal source directory was not found. Some code functions will not work. It is recommended that you install it and set the path Environment -> Environment Options -> Files [Ignore]" After further research I can confirm that the relevant directory is installed (in Xubuntu, and probably also was in Kubuntu) and it is just the Environment Option setting that is missing (as you suggest above). The text of the message box misled me. > [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/amd64/lazarus/0.9.24-0-9 ia86 not amd64. Sorry for not making that clear. Xubuntu apt-cache show lazarus Package: lazarus Priority: optional Section: universe/devel Installed-Size: 68 Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Original-Maintainer: Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Version: 0.9.24-0-9 Depends: lazarus-ide, lazarus-src, lazarus-doc Pre-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.10.24) Recommends: fpc, fpc-source Suggests: fp-utils, fp-docs Filename: pool/universe/l/lazarus/lazarus_0.9.24-0-9_all.deb Size: 14196 MD5sum: 52ef80d7b568ed230036573e378e7a31 SHA1: 258b9038d19191c7884215c0665c133076ad390e SHA256: 2285791c7086ef8f1687334eae829a920b2b8c99f8c04f31b56fd49f80731cd6 Description: Rapid Application Development (RAD) tool for Free Pascal Lazarus are the class libraries for Free Pascal that emulate Delphi. Free Pascal is a GPL'd compiler that runs on Linux, Win32, OS/2, 68K and other OS's. Free Pascal is designed to be able to understand and compile programs written with the Delphi syntax, which is object- oriented. Lazarus is the part of the missing puzzle that will allow you to develop Delphi-like programs in all of the above platforms. . Unlike Java's "write once, run anywhere" motto, Lazarus and Free Pascal strive for "write once, compile anywhere". Since the exact same compiler is available on all of the above platforms you don't need to do any recoding to produce identical products for different platforms. . In short, Lazarus is a free RAD tool for Free Pascal using its Lazarus Component Library (LCL). . This IDE will eventually reach Delphi's full functionality. Homepage: http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org Bugs: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Origin: Ubuntu Thanks for your attention to this. I appreciate the effort that you guys put in to improve the world for the rest of us. Chris -- Installation does not set Freepascal source directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 211674] Re: Adept Manager crashes when you add bad URL of a mirror
I have just come up against this bug with Kubuntu 8.10 (released version). The effect is that once a bad URL (e.g. "http;" instead of "http:") is in sources.list, Adept will crash when it is started, giving no opportunity for fixing (or circumventing) the problem. The end-user is then stuck (unless he/she has enough knowledge to go the correct file and manually edit it). IMHO the priority should rather greater than "low". Contrastingly, Synaptic outputs a diagnostic indicating the line where the error is and continues by ignoring that line. -- Adept Manager crashes when you add bad URL of a mirror https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211674 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to adept in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 303709] Re: Installation does not set Freepascal source directory
> If I understand correctly you get the screen that I attach to this bug. > Right? > > ** Attachment added: "Screenshot with error message" >http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20114769/Lazarus_screenshot.png Correct. -- Installation does not set Freepascal source directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303709 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94148] Re: atheros wifi card drop connection and low signal
I am having a similar problem on my T60 running Ubuntu 7.10 Tribe 4. My wireless card is ... 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications, Inc. AR5212 802.11abg NIC (rev 01) I cannot get a connection, and my signal is only about ~70 percent right next to the router. My kernel is 2.6.22-9-generic. thanks -- atheros wifi card drop connection and low signal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189656] Re: gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
I had 3 terminals open, in one I was scp'ing a large file. I decided to change the default font, and I unchecked the box, and then gnome- terminal crashed. I can't reproduce this bug, now I can check/un-check the default font box fine. -- gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207780] [NEW] awn-manager crashed with Restarting AWN usually solves this issue in setup_chooser()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 196323 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196323 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: avant-window-navigator I just installed awn-manager, and have compiz enabled. I then launched the awn manager preferences, and then it crashed. This bug happens *every* time I launch awn-manager. Even if I launch from the command line. 1) Description: Ubuntu hardy (development branch) Release:8.04 2) awn-manager: Installed: 0.2.1-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 0.2.1-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 0.2.1-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) I expected the preferences to launch. 4) It crashed! But the rest of the system was stable. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Mar 27 10:12:07 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/awn-manager InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 NonfreeKernelModules: ath_hal Package: awn-manager 0.2.1-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: all ProcCmdline: python /usr/bin/awn-manager ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/awn-manager'] SourcePackage: avant-window-navigator Title: awn-manager crashed with Restarting AWN usually solves this issue in setup_chooser() Uname: Linux 2.6.24-12-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev video ** Affects: avant-window-navigator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash -- awn-manager crashed with Restarting AWN usually solves this issue in setup_chooser() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207780] Re: awn-manager crashed with Restarting AWN usually solves this issue in setup_chooser()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 196323 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196323 ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12921731/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12921732/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12921733/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Traceback.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12921734/Traceback.txt ** Description changed: Binary package hint: avant-window-navigator I just installed awn-manager, and have compiz enabled. I then launched the awn manager preferences, and then it crashed. + + This bug happens *every* time I launch awn-manager. + Even if I launch from the command line. 1) Description: Ubuntu hardy (development branch) Release: 8.04 2) awn-manager: Installed: 0.2.1-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 0.2.1-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 0.2.1-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) I expected the preferences to launch. 4) It crashed! But the rest of the system was stable. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Mar 27 10:12:07 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/awn-manager InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 NonfreeKernelModules: ath_hal Package: awn-manager 0.2.1-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: all ProcCmdline: python /usr/bin/awn-manager ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/awn-manager'] SourcePackage: avant-window-navigator Title: awn-manager crashed with Restarting AWN usually solves this issue in setup_chooser() Uname: Linux 2.6.24-12-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev video -- awn-manager crashed with Restarting AWN usually solves this issue in setup_chooser() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205235] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV while using Adobe Flash
I was viewing a flash movie in firefox-3.0b4 and firefox hung. I wanted to watch the movie, but instead firefox hung. I force quit the application and submitted this bug report. firefox-3.0 Description:Ubuntu hardy (development branch) Release:8.04 firefox-3.0: Installed: 3.0~b4+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 3.0~b4+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 3.0~b4+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status flashplugin-nonfree: Installed: 9.0.115.0ubuntu4 Candidate: 9.0.115.0ubuntu4 Version table: *** 9.0.115.0ubuntu4 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV while using Adobe Flash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205235 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251893] [NEW] apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox My music collection is encoded in Apple lossless format, however when I play back with Rhythmbox I get odd static and clicks when the last second of audio is played. I am using Ubuntu 8.04 and Rhythmbox 0.11.5. I am playing back the audio files from an external hard drive. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jul 25 10:05:58 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/rhythmbox NonfreeKernelModules: ath_hal Package: rhythmbox 0.11.5-0ubuntu8 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SourcePackage: rhythmbox Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic i686 ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251893] Re: apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16303499/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16303500/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16303501/ProcStatus.txt -- apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 251893] Re: apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file
~$ gst-launch-0.10 playbin uri=file:///test1.m4a Setting pipeline to PAUSED ... Pipeline is PREROLLING ... Pipeline is PREROLLED ... Setting pipeline to PLAYING ... New clock: GstAudioSinkClock Got EOS from element "playbin0". Execution ended after 143451614091 ns. Setting pipeline to PAUSED ... Setting pipeline to READY ... Setting pipeline to NULL ... FREEING pipeline ... This produced no static at the end of the file, and I also tried this with multiple apple lossless encoded files. On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Pedro Villavicencio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > thanks for the report, does the same happens if you play the music with: > gst-launch-0.10 playbin uri=file:///path/to/music ? > > ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided => Low > Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) > Status: New => Incomplete > > -- > apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251893 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 53700] Re: edgy alt installer IDE drive as "SCSI1 (0,0,0)"
Kubuntu 8.04 (Hardy Heron) x86 alternate install CD ASUS CUV4X mobo Adaptec AHA-2940 SCSI card Maxtor 90845D4 (on IDE channel 0 as master) is reported incorrectly by the installer as SCSI1 (should be IDE1) Seagate ST380215A (on IDE channel 0 as slave) is reported incorrectly by the installer as SCSI2 (should be IDE2) Quantum 1050pD (first and only SCSI drive) is reported as SCSI3 (should be SCSI1) The installation works but the incorrect reporting of the drives will be very disconcerting for the naive user - for Linux to be "ready for the desktop" such details need to be got right! -- edgy alt installer IDE drive as "SCSI1 (0,0,0)" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/53700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226391] [NEW] snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180
Public bug reported: Kubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron (x86 alternate install, fwiw) dmesg shows CT4180 card recognised by isapnp as 'Creative ViBRA16C PnP' but the snd-sb16 module isn't loaded at boot time. OK after modprobe snd-sb16. (I can add it to /etc/modules but surely I should not need to do this) ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226418] [NEW] segv
Public bug reported: SEGV in Adept Manager 2.1 Cruiser using KDE 3.5.9 in Kubuntu 8.04 for x86 action: Manage Repositories, Third Party Software, select CD and Hardy Partner (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb662c6c0 (LWP 16683)] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [KCrash handler] #6 0x081019f2 in ?? () #7 0x0811367b in ?? () #8 0x08110a4f in ?? () #9 0x080fcb9c in ?? () #10 0x080fd232 in ?? () #11 0x080fe16e in ?? () #12 0x080fe1d4 in ?? () #13 0x080fa449 in ?? () #14 0x080744a5 in ?? () #15 0x080763af in ?? () #16 0xb6f09704 in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #17 0xb756fbee in KProcess::processExited () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #18 0xb756fc4f in KProcess::processHasExited () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #19 0xb756ca20 in KProcessController::slotDoHousekeeping () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #20 0xb756cb62 in KProcessController::qt_invoke () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #21 0xb6f09704 in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #22 0xb6f0a051 in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #23 0xb7299b99 in QSocketNotifier::activated () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #24 0xb6f2b766 in QSocketNotifier::event () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #25 0xb6e9dc36 in QApplication::internalNotify () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #26 0xb6e9fa5f in QApplication::notify () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #27 0xb7647672 in KApplication::notify () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #28 0xb6e2e28d in QApplication::sendEvent () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #29 0xb6e8fb4a in QEventLoop::activateSocketNotifiers () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #30 0xb6e43630 in QEventLoop::processEvents () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #31 0xb6eb8f90 in QEventLoop::enterLoop () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #32 0xb6eb8c8e in QEventLoop::exec () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #33 0xb6e9f7df in QApplication::exec () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #34 0x080717b3 in ?? () #35 0xb668f450 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #36 0x08071401 in ?? () ** Affects: adept (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- segv https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 217376] Re: kubuntu 8.04 beta alternative installer hangs
> > Can you reproduce this with a current daily build? > > With only a 0.5 Mbps downlink, I don't have sufficient spare time ... > sorry. > > But I can add (should have said so in the initial report, sorry) that > "kubuntu 7.10 386 alternate" installs ok With the released Kubuntu 8.04 386 alternate - the problem is still there. I have also tried changing to an 8.4 GB drive but to no avail. Chris -- kubuntu 8.04 beta alternative installer hangs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217376 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 217376] Re: kubuntu 8.04 beta alternative installer hangs
The problem is in the ALTERNATIVE INSTALLER, repeat: the INSTALLER - how then is a new kernel for the installed system relevant? On 29 Aug 2008 at 4:02, Leann Ogasawara wrote: > The Ubuntu Kernel Team is planning to move to the 2.6.27 kernel for the > upcoming Intrepid Ibex 8.10 release. As a result, the kernel team would > appreciate it if you could please test this newer 2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel. > There are one of two ways you should be able to test: > > 1) If you are comfortable installing packages on your own, the linux- > image-2.6.27-* package is currently available for you to install and test. > > --or-- > > 2) The upcoming Alpha5 for Intrepid Ibex 8.10 will contain this newer > 2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel. Alpha5 is set to be released Thursday Sept 4. > Please watch http://www.ubuntu.com/testing for Alpha5 to be announced. You > should then be able to test via a LiveCD. > > Please let us know immediately if this newer 2.6.27 kernel resolves the > bug reported here or if the issue remains. More importantly, please open > a new bug report for each new bug/regression introduced by the 2.6.27 > kernel and tag the bug report with 'linux-2.6.27'. Also, please > specifically note if the issue does or does not appear in the 2.6.26 > kernel. Thanks again, we really appreicate your help and feedback. > > ** Tags added: cft-2.6.27 > > -- > kubuntu 8.04 beta alternative installer hangs > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217376 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of > the bug. -- kubuntu 8.04 beta alternative installer hangs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217376 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251893] [NEW] apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: rhythmbox My music collection is encoded in Apple lossless format, however when I play back with Rhythmbox I get odd static and clicks when the last second of audio is played. I am using Ubuntu 8.04 and Rhythmbox 0.11.5. I am playing back the audio files from an external hard drive. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jul 25 10:05:58 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/rhythmbox NonfreeKernelModules: ath_hal Package: rhythmbox 0.11.5-0ubuntu8 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SourcePackage: rhythmbox Uname: Linux 2.6.24-19-generic i686 ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251893] Re: apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16303499/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16303500/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16303501/ProcStatus.txt -- apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 251893] Re: apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file
~$ gst-launch-0.10 playbin uri=file:///test1.m4a Setting pipeline to PAUSED ... Pipeline is PREROLLING ... Pipeline is PREROLLED ... Setting pipeline to PLAYING ... New clock: GstAudioSinkClock Got EOS from element "playbin0". Execution ended after 143451614091 ns. Setting pipeline to PAUSED ... Setting pipeline to READY ... Setting pipeline to NULL ... FREEING pipeline ... This produced no static at the end of the file, and I also tried this with multiple apple lossless encoded files. On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Pedro Villavicencio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > thanks for the report, does the same happens if you play the music with: > gst-launch-0.10 playbin uri=file:///path/to/music ? > > ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided => Low > Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) > Status: New => Incomplete > > -- > apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251893 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- apple lossless encoded files playback static at end of file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 53700] Re: edgy alt installer IDE drive as "SCSI1 (0,0,0)"
Kubuntu 8.04 (Hardy Heron) x86 alternate install CD ASUS CUV4X mobo Adaptec AHA-2940 SCSI card Maxtor 90845D4 (on IDE channel 0 as master) is reported incorrectly by the installer as SCSI1 (should be IDE1) Seagate ST380215A (on IDE channel 0 as slave) is reported incorrectly by the installer as SCSI2 (should be IDE2) Quantum 1050pD (first and only SCSI drive) is reported as SCSI3 (should be SCSI1) The installation works but the incorrect reporting of the drives will be very disconcerting for the naive user - for Linux to be "ready for the desktop" such details need to be got right! -- edgy alt installer IDE drive as "SCSI1 (0,0,0)" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/53700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226391] [NEW] snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180
Public bug reported: Kubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron (x86 alternate install, fwiw) dmesg shows CT4180 card recognised by isapnp as 'Creative ViBRA16C PnP' but the snd-sb16 module isn't loaded at boot time. OK after modprobe snd-sb16. (I can add it to /etc/modules but surely I should not need to do this) ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- snd-sb16 module not loaded for CT4180 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226391 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 226418] [NEW] segv
Public bug reported: SEGV in Adept Manager 2.1 Cruiser using KDE 3.5.9 in Kubuntu 8.04 for x86 action: Manage Repositories, Third Party Software, select CD and Hardy Partner (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb662c6c0 (LWP 16683)] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [KCrash handler] #6 0x081019f2 in ?? () #7 0x0811367b in ?? () #8 0x08110a4f in ?? () #9 0x080fcb9c in ?? () #10 0x080fd232 in ?? () #11 0x080fe16e in ?? () #12 0x080fe1d4 in ?? () #13 0x080fa449 in ?? () #14 0x080744a5 in ?? () #15 0x080763af in ?? () #16 0xb6f09704 in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #17 0xb756fbee in KProcess::processExited () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #18 0xb756fc4f in KProcess::processHasExited () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #19 0xb756ca20 in KProcessController::slotDoHousekeeping () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #20 0xb756cb62 in KProcessController::qt_invoke () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #21 0xb6f09704 in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #22 0xb6f0a051 in QObject::activate_signal () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #23 0xb7299b99 in QSocketNotifier::activated () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #24 0xb6f2b766 in QSocketNotifier::event () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #25 0xb6e9dc36 in QApplication::internalNotify () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #26 0xb6e9fa5f in QApplication::notify () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #27 0xb7647672 in KApplication::notify () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.4 #28 0xb6e2e28d in QApplication::sendEvent () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #29 0xb6e8fb4a in QEventLoop::activateSocketNotifiers () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #30 0xb6e43630 in QEventLoop::processEvents () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #31 0xb6eb8f90 in QEventLoop::enterLoop () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #32 0xb6eb8c8e in QEventLoop::exec () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #33 0xb6e9f7df in QApplication::exec () from /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 #34 0x080717b3 in ?? () #35 0xb668f450 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #36 0x08071401 in ?? () ** Affects: adept (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- segv https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189656] Re: gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
I had 3 terminals open, in one I was scp'ing a large file. I decided to change the default font, and I unchecked the box, and then gnome- terminal crashed. I can't reproduce this bug, now I can check/un-check the default font box fine. -- gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207780] [NEW] awn-manager crashed with Restarting AWN usually solves this issue in setup_chooser()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 196323 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196323 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: avant-window-navigator I just installed awn-manager, and have compiz enabled. I then launched the awn manager preferences, and then it crashed. This bug happens *every* time I launch awn-manager. Even if I launch from the command line. 1) Description: Ubuntu hardy (development branch) Release:8.04 2) awn-manager: Installed: 0.2.1-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 0.2.1-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 0.2.1-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) I expected the preferences to launch. 4) It crashed! But the rest of the system was stable. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Mar 27 10:12:07 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/awn-manager InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.5 NonfreeKernelModules: ath_hal Package: awn-manager 0.2.1-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: all ProcCmdline: python /usr/bin/awn-manager ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/awn-manager'] SourcePackage: avant-window-navigator Title: awn-manager crashed with Restarting AWN usually solves this issue in setup_chooser() Uname: Linux 2.6.24-12-generic i686 UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev video ** Affects: avant-window-navigator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash -- awn-manager crashed with Restarting AWN usually solves this issue in setup_chooser() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
