[Bug 2073790] Re: Enable frame pointers
** Changed in: bonnie++ (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073790 Title: Enable frame pointers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bonnie++/+bug/2073790/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073790] Re: Enable frame pointers
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu/+source/bonnie++/+git/bonnie++/+merge/469958 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073790 Title: Enable frame pointers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bonnie++/+bug/2073790/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073790] [NEW] Enable frame pointers
Public bug reported: bonnie++ doesn't respect dpkg-buildflags, so frame pointers were not enable during the mass rebuilds to enable them. Tracking bug to fix packaging to do so. ** Affects: bonnie++ (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073790 Title: Enable frame pointers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bonnie++/+bug/2073790/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2073594] Re: Autoinstall fails when using recovery_keyfile workflow
Hi James, thanks for the report and the logs and data. I was able to
reproduce this today using the autoinstall you provided. I see that we
setup the dm_crypt device correctly but it looks like we're missing a
step saving off the key data:
2024-07-19 23:19:10,856 DEBUG subiquity.models.filesystem:2345 Copying
recovery key for DM_Crypt(volume=partition-3, key=,
recovery_key=RecoveryKeyHandler(live_location=PosixPath('/root/luks_recovery_key'),
backup_location=PosixPath('/var/log/installer/luks_recovery_key')),
path='/dev/mapper/dm_crypt-0', id='dm_crypt-0', type='dm_crypt') to
target: /target
** Package changed: subiquity (Ubuntu) => subiquity
** Changed in: subiquity
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: subiquity
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags added: reproducible
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073594
Title:
Autoinstall fails when using recovery_keyfile workflow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2073594/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1974483] Re: autoinstall ssh:install-server:false is misleading in 22.04
** Description changed: + [ Impact ] + openssh-server is always installed to the target machine regardless of the user's explicit choice to not have it installed. + + Backporting the fix will allow image builds to pick up it up and become + available for the next point release. + + The upload fixes the bug by removing ssh-import-id from the server- + minimal seed and meta-package such that it's not part of the base layer + copied over during install. + + [ Test Plan ] + + live images -- Test 1: + 1. Download the latest server installer image from https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/jammy/daily-live/ + 2. Perform a regular install using the image and on the "SSH configuration" screen make sure "Install OpenSSH server" is NOT selected. + 3. Finish the install and reboot the machine. + 4. Login to the rebooted machine using the credentials provided during install. + 5. Using "apt-cache policy openssh-server" and "apt-cache policy ssh-import-id" confirm neither are installed. + + live images -- Test 2: + - Perform Test 1 but instead opt-in to installing openssh-server and ensure it is installed in the target system. + + live-images -- Test 3: + - Perform Test 2 but in a completely offline fashion. + + pre-installed images: + - Download the latest preinstalled image from: https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/jammy/daily-preinstalled/ + - Boot the image and, using the same commands as above, confirm openssh-server and ssh-import-id ARE installed + + [ Where problems could occur ] + - openssh-server could be included in the build through other means than identified by the proposed upload, causing the package to be still installed by default. + - openssh-server and ssh-import-id could fail to become part of the pool, prohibiting offline install of the packages. + - Changes to the seeds could cause preinstalled images to lack the package. + - The image build(s) may produce errors if they rely on openssh-server or ssh-import-id already being available in a layer in which it's now no longer included. (I can't say it's likely but it is worth mentioning) + + [ Other Info ] + + * I have built test images for ubuntu-cpc, both minimized and non-minimized, with my seed changes and verified those images will still correctly contain ssh-import-id and open-ssh-server + + + [ Original Description] + With 22.04, openssh-server is baked into the image curtin copies to the - target. The ssh:install-server key no longer controls whether openssh- - server gets installed. It should be easy enough to have the bit of code + target. The ssh:install-server key no longer controls whether openssh- + server gets installed. It should be easy enough to have the bit of code that installs openssh-server when the key is true also remove it when the key is false. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974483 Title: autoinstall ssh:install-server:false is misleading in 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1974483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2072813] [NEW] Please merge 2.40.2-1 into oracular
Public bug reported: tracking bug ** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072813 Title: Please merge 2.40.2-1 into oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/2072813/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071115] Re: Please sync privoxy 3.0.34-5 from Debian sid into oracular
** Changed in: privoxy (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071115 Title: Please sync privoxy 3.0.34-5 from Debian sid into oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/privoxy/+bug/2071115/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071620] Re: Subiquity segfaults in extract_ssid
Hi and thank you for your report. Could you please also attach the logs in /var/log/installer? ** Also affects: subiquity Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: subiquity Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071620 Title: Subiquity segfaults in extract_ssid To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2071620/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063331] Re: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service runs into a timeout during boot
** Changed in: subiquity Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063331 Title: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service runs into a timeout during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2063331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071369] Re: libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl package/0.24+~cs0.5-1 vs libcgi-pm-perl/ 4.66-1
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1074399 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074399 ** Also affects: libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074399 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071369 Title: libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl package/0.24+~cs0.5-1 vs libcgi-pm-perl/ 4.66-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl/+bug/2071369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071369] Re: libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl package/0.24+~cs0.5-1 vs libcgi-pm-perl/ 4.66-1
libcgi-application-plugin-authentication's autopkgtests have regressed due to the latest version of libcgi-pm-perl (4.66) changing behavior with trailing slashes in URLs [1]. After re-running the tests with this change, it appears this this is the only instance of this regression. Please see the linked MP for the proposed patch. PPA w/ successful build: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/libcgi-application-plugin- authentication-perl/+packages Passing autopkgtest results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-cpete- libcgi-application-plugin-authentication- perl/oracular/amd64/libc/libcgi-application-plugin-authentication- perl/20240627_223102_a542e@/log.gz [1] https://github.com/leejo/CGI.pm/commit/a5485b5f3b2b1cc85761b6781ff6660b4f377498 ** Changed in: libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New ** Changed in: libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071369 Title: libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl package/0.24+~cs0.5-1 vs libcgi-pm-perl/ 4.66-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl/+bug/2071369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071369] [NEW] libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl package/0.24+~cs0.5-1 vs libcgi-pm-perl/ 4.66-1
Public bug reported: Autopkgtest results: https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest- oracular/oracular/amd64/libc/libcgi-application-plugin-authentication- perl/20240627_124201_3ea3d@/log.gz The primary error appears to be: 52s ok 1 - taint checking is on 152s # Subtest: empty 152s 1..14 152s ok 1 - login failure 152s ok 2 - username not set 152s ok 3 - An object of class 'CGI::Application::Plugin::Authentication::Display::Basic' isa 'CGI::Application::Plugin::Authentication::Display' 152s ok 4 - An object of class 'CGI::Application::Plugin::Authentication::Display::Basic' isa 'CGI::Application::Plugin::Authentication::Display::Basic' 152s ok 5 - title 152s not ok 6 - login box 152s 152s # Failed test 'login box' 152s # at /usr/share/perl5/Test/Regression.pm line 92. 152s # +---++---+ 152s # | Ln|Got |Expected | 152s # +---++---+ 152s # | 28| | | 152s # | 29| | | 152s # | 30| | | 152s # * 31| http://localhost/; /> | http://localhost; /> * 152s # | 32| | | 152s # | 33| | | 152s # | 34|' |' | 152s # +---++---+ 152s ok 7 - logout_form 152s ok 8 - is_authenticated 152s ok 9 - username 152s ok 10 - last_login 152s ok 11 - last_access 152s ok 12 - is_login_timeout 152s ok 13 - login_attempts 152s ok 14 - not authenticated 152s # Looks like you failed 1 test of 14. ** Affects: libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: In Progress ** Affects: libcgi-pm-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse ** Also affects: libcgi-pm-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071369 Title: libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl package/0.24+~cs0.5-1 vs libcgi-pm-perl/ 4.66-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcgi-application-plugin-authentication-perl/+bug/2071369/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059344] Re: 3.0.34-3ubuntu1 autopkgtest failure
Thanks Roland. I tried 3.0.34-5 and I can confirm it fixes the issue! Syncing now (LP: #2071115). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059344 Title: 3.0.34-3ubuntu1 autopkgtest failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/privoxy/+bug/2059344/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071115] Re: Please sync privoxy 3.0.34-5 from Debian sid into oracular
I can confirm the new version builds successfully in Oracular and the autopkgtest results have improved: PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/privoxy/+packages AMD64 autopkgtest results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-cpete-privoxy/ ** Description changed: - The delta introduced in 3.0.34-3ubuntu1 was integrated by 3.0.34-4 [1] - 3.0.34-3ubuntu2 was a rebuild and introduced no further delta. + There is only one Ubuntu delta, which was introduced in 3.0.34-3ubuntu1. + This has been integrated by Debian in 3.0.34-4 [1]. - Additionally, 3.0.34-4 resolves the open bug LP: #2059344. + (3.0.34-3ubuntu2 was a rebuild and introduced no further delta) + + Additionally, 3.0.34-4 introduced changes to fix LP: #2059344 which will + help close out that issue. [1] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1529888/accepted-privoxy-3034-4-source-into-unstable/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071115 Title: Please sync privoxy 3.0.34-5 from Debian sid into oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/privoxy/+bug/2071115/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071115] Re: Please sync privoxy 3.0.34-5 from Debian sid into oracular
** Summary changed: - Please merge privoxy 3.0.34-5 into oracular + Please sync privoxy 3.0.34-5 from Debian sid into oracular ** Changed in: privoxy (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New ** Changed in: privoxy (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) => (unassigned) ** Description changed: - tracking bug + The delta introduced in 3.0.34-3ubuntu1 was integrated by 3.0.34-4 [1] + 3.0.34-3ubuntu2 was a rebuild and introduced no further delta. + + Additionally, 3.0.34-4 resolves the open bug LP: #2059344. + + + [1] https://tracker.debian.org/news/1529888/accepted-privoxy-3034-4-source-into-unstable/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071115 Title: Please sync privoxy 3.0.34-5 from Debian sid into oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/privoxy/+bug/2071115/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2071115] [NEW] Please merge privoxy 3.0.34-5 into oracular
Public bug reported: tracking bug ** Affects: privoxy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071115 Title: Please merge privoxy 3.0.34-5 into oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/privoxy/+bug/2071115/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067775] Re: subiquity package-hook is outdated
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu/+source/apport/+git/apport/+merge/468177 ** Merge proposal unlinked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu/+source/apport/+git/apport/+merge/468169 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067775 Title: subiquity package-hook is outdated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/2067775/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067775] Re: subiquity package-hook is outdated
In preparing the SRU uploads, I found that the pkexec permissions elevation can fail which caused the hook to crash. I will open a separate bug with the details, but I opened MP:#468169 to address the problem in the subiquity hook and included the relevant change in the SRU MPs. ** Description changed: + [Impact] + The Subiquity package hook in Apport has not been updated to collect the type of information we are typically interested in (e.g. - /var/log/installer/subiquity-*). + /var/log/installer/\*). This means users who run `ubuntu-bug subiquity` + from the terminal will not automatically collect relevant information to + attach to their bug reports. This upload fixes this by updating + Subiquity's package hook to collect logs and information typically used + for debugging Subiquity bugs. This fix needs to be SRUd to Noble and + Jammy so that users performing these installs can run `ubuntu-bug + subiquity` and collect relevant information. + + [Test Plan] + + The test plan is focused on testing the behavior of apport within the + live installation environment, where we primarily expect users to submit + bug reports from. Thus the test plan is split into three different test + plans: Two for Desktop images and one for Server. For Noble, all three + test scenarios are relevant. For Jammy, it is only necessary to test + Server since the Desktop installer for Jammy is not Subiquity based. + + Desktop - Manual: + 1) Download the latest Noble Desktop ISO [1]. + 2) Begin an installation using the media you downloaded. You may progress the install as far as you like, with the following restrictions: (1) At minimum you need wait for the first screen to show up and (2) at most you may allow the install to finish but do not allow the system to restart (you need to be in the live-environment to proceed). + 3) Open a terminal (ctl + alt + t) + 4) Enable proposed[4] and update apport + 5) Run the following command "APPORT_LAUNCHPAD_INSTANCE=qastaging ubuntu-bug subiquity" + 6) 4 authorization prompts will display, requesting access to collect information from the system. Allow all of them. + 7) Inspect the fields of the report and ensure that none report "permission denied" or similar. + 8) Click "Send" on the resulting dialog to send the report. Firefox will open up to finish filling out the bug information on launchpad. + 9) Log in and enter anything as the title and hit continue. Click "No, I need to report a new bug" if necessary + 10) Enter anything in the "further information section". Ensure that the field below this section, titled "This bug contains information that is", is marked "Private" by default. + 11) You can now submit the bug and inspect the automatically filled description for further errors in the report. (Errors messages are typically short enough to show up in the body of the bug description while larger attachments with real information end up as attachments) + + Desktop - Automatic: + 1) Download the latest Noble Desktop ISO [1]. + 2) Begin an installation using the media you downloaded. You may progress the install as far as you like, with the following restrictions: (1) At minimum you need wait for the first screen to show up and (2) at most you may allow the install to finish but do not allow the system to restart (you need to be in the live-environment to proceed). + 3) Open a terminal (ctl + alt + t) + 4) Enable proposed[4] and update apport + 5) Create a fake subiquity crash file: sudo printf "Package: subiquity\nProblemType: crash\n" > /var/crash/test.crash + 6) authorize the collection of information + 7) Inspect the generated data. Ensure: + - The key LaunchpadPrivate exists + - There are no "permission denied" errors + - Do NOT submit the report + + + Server (Jammy or Noble): + 1) Download the latest Server ISO for the release you have chosen to verify (Noble[2] or Jammy[3]) + 2) Begin an installation using the media you downloaded. You may progress the install as far as you like, with the following restrictions: (1) At minimum you need wait for the first screen to show up and (2) at most you may allow the install to finish but do not allow the system to restart (you need to be in the live-environment to proceed). + 3) Enter the debug shell (F2 or ctrl+z) + 4) Enable proposed[4] and update apport + 5) Run the following command "sudo APPORT_LAUNCHPAD_INSTANCE=qastaging ubuntu-bug subiquity" (sudo is required) + 6) Apport will ask for which matching application you want to report against. Select option 2, which should read "subiquity (1234 of snap /snap/subiquity/1234 of version $release_ver) deb package" + 7) Now apport should ask how you want to proceed. Select "S: Send report" + 8) Once the upload is complete, open the URL in a browser on another machine to complete the installation. + 9) Log in and enter anything as the title and hit continue. Click "No, I need to report a new bug" if necessary + 10) Enter anything in the
[Bug 2067775] Re: subiquity package-hook is outdated
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu/+source/apport/+git/apport/+merge/468169 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067775 Title: subiquity package-hook is outdated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/2067775/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2069856] Re: installation fails in the presence of foreign packages
Hi and thanks for your report. Reassigning to u-r-u for upgrade issues. ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: subiquity Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069856 Title: installation fails in the presence of foreign packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2069856/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063331] Re: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service runs into a timeout during boot
** Changed in: subiquity Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: subiquity Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris Peterson (cpete) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063331 Title: systemd-networkd-wait-online.service runs into a timeout during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2063331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067775] Re: subiquity package-hook is outdated
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067775 Title: subiquity package-hook is outdated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/2067775/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067654] Re: [MIR] libsub-prototype-perl
libsub-override-perl has been demoted to Universe, so this MIR can be ignored. ** Changed in: libsub-prototype-perl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067654 Title: [MIR] libsub-prototype-perl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsub-prototype-perl/+bug/2067654/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067654] Re: [MIR] libsub-prototype-perl
** Description changed: [Availability] The package libsub-prototype-perl is already in Ubuntu universe. The package libsub-prototype-perl builds for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x, i386 Link to package: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsub-prototype-perl [Rationale] The package libsub-prototype-perl is required in Ubuntu main as a Test and Runtime dependency of libsub-override-perl, a package already in main. This - dependency was recently introduced in libsub-override-perl version 0.11-1 + depedency was recently introduced in libsub-override-perl version 0.11-1 (currently in Oracular proposed). There doesn't appear to be alternative packages with the same functionality available in the archive. The package libsub-prototype-perl is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15th 2024 (Feature Freeze for OO) so that new version of libsub-override-perl can migrate to the release pocket before release. [Security] No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past The package is a very simple Perl library/module. After inspecting the package, I found: - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software (filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) The package does not use security related algorithms, insecure or otherwise. [Quality assurance - function/usage] The package works well right after install - + [Quality assurance - maintenance] + - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does + not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs + - The package has no open bugs in Ubuntu, other than this one ;) + - The package has no open bugs in Debian + - Tracker links: + - Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsub-prototype-perl/+bug + - Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libsub-prototype-perl + - metacpan: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Dist/Display.html?Name=Sub-Prototype + - Upstream: https://github.com/karenetheridge/Sub-Prototype + - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support + + Upstream has not seen any updates for 5 years, but there are also no pending + PRs. I can only find one instance of a bug being filed against this package + 5 years ago, but it was resolved promptly: + + https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=121723 + + Considering the simplicity of the package, I suspect its minimal updates + should not be an issue. + + [Quality assurance - testing] + - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the + build fail + - Passing build with tests for 0.02-2build3 in Noble on amd64 + https://launchpadlibrarian.net/722313391/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-amd64.libsub-prototype-perl_0.03-2build3_BUILDING.txt.gz + +- I can't find logs to a failing build. I believe the above is sufficient, + it looks clear that if the tests fail then the build will too, but I can + provide a PPA with a faulty version to tests build failures. + + - The package runs autopkgtests: + +- https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libsub-prototype-perl + +- The tests are: + - The same build time tests (autodep8-perl-build-deps) + - autodep8-perl-recommends + - autodep8-perl + +- These tests are currently passing on amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, + and s390x. + +- They are /failing/ on i386, although this appears to be issues with perl + installability on i386 during the test run, not the package itself. + + + [Quality assurance - packaging] + + - debian/watch is present and works + + - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer field + + - Build log for the current version (0.03-2build3) on amd64: + + https://launchpadlibrarian.net/722313391/buildlog_ubuntu-noble- + amd64.libsub-prototype-perl_0.03-2build3_BUILDING.txt.gz + + + - output of `lintian --pedantic` is empty + + - This package does not yield massive lintian Warnings, Errors + + - Lintian overrides are not present + + - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted + packages. + + - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies + + - The package will not be installed by default + - I checked the output of "seeded-in-ubuntu" for this package and the + requesting package, libsub-prototype-perl, and found both were not + seeded. + + - Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules: + + https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsub-prototype- + perl/tree/debian/rules + + [UI standards] + This package is a perl library, not an application => not user facing, no +
[Bug 2068558] Re: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1072808 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072808 ** Also affects: python-dtcwt (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072808 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068558 Title: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-dtcwt/+bug/2068558/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] Re: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1072810 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072810 ** Also affects: pytest (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072810 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068778] Re: pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1ubuntu1
It looks like this upstream commit tries to address the issue: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest- rerunfailures/commit/0ab54f00d68bb4feadae58d2f4e30f6663495571 but I believe that was for pytest 8.1. The issue still persists in pytest 8.2+ even with the above patch applied. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068778 Title: pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068783] Re: silx/2.0.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Description changed: Silx autopkgtests fail against pytest 8.2 only on ppc64el https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest- oracular/oracular/ppc64el/s/silx/20240607_144904_0f43c@/log.gz - - Helpful hint: the FAIL non-zero exit status 247 is not the interpreter segfaulting, it's just the way the test runner is setup. + Helpful hint: the FAIL non-zero exit status 247 is may not be the + interpreter segfaulting, it's just the way the test runner is setup. I + fixed a previous issue where a failing test "crashed" the runner but I + was able to get a more useful error message setting up the tests in a + regular manner. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068783 Title: silx/2.0.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068783/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068783] [NEW] silx/2.0.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
Public bug reported: Silx autopkgtests fail against pytest 8.2 only on ppc64el https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest- oracular/oracular/ppc64el/s/silx/20240607_144904_0f43c@/log.gz Helpful hint: the FAIL non-zero exit status 247 is not the interpreter segfaulting, it's just the way the test runner is setup. ** Affects: pytest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: silx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse ** Also affects: pytest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068783 Title: silx/2.0.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068783/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068778] [NEW] pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1ubuntu1
Public bug reported: pytest-rerunfailures has a regression due to changes in pytest 8.2.2 where non-function test fixtures (e.g. class, module, etc.) fail to be torn down directly. It's likely the issue is within pytest-rerunfailures and there's an open issue upstream about it here: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest- rerunfailures/issues/267 Although it's definitely possible it's a pytest issue. There's an open issue that may track it there as well: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/12284 ** Affects: pytest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: pytest-rerunfailures (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse ** Also affects: pytest-rerunfailures (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068778 Title: pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] Re: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Changed in: python-flaky (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: pytest-rerunfailures (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] Re: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Changed in: pytest (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New ** Changed in: pytest (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] Re: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
We could probably be more clear in the changelog on what the patch I provided does. Can we use: pytest (8.2.2-1ubuntu1) oracular; urgency=medium * 0003-pytest8-testcase-assertion.patch: Fixes unittest regression in flaky test plugins (LP: #2068642). -- Chris Peterson Fri, 07 Jun 2024 15:48:04 -0700 instead please? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] Re: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
So the patch won't fully fix the issue for pytest-rerunfailures, but since the pytest upstream bug [1] that this patch fixes was originally posted due to a regression in pytest-rerunfailures I think this is a net improvement. After applying the fix for [1], the error now in pytest-rerunfailures is that non-function teardown fixtures (e.g. class, module, etc.) do not get called correctly. This was previously a problem that upstream tried to solve in [2] but I think pytest 8.2 introduced changes that cause it to regress again. There is an upstream (rerunfailures) bug [3] to track the issue there. [1] https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/12424 [2] https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-rerunfailures/commit/0ab54f00d68bb4feadae58d2f4e30f6663495571 [3] https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-rerunfailures/issues/267 ** Bug watch added: github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues #12424 https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/12424 ** Bug watch added: github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-rerunfailures/issues #267 https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-rerunfailures/issues/267 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] Re: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
New debidff with revised patch. ** Patch added: "1_pytest_8.2.2-1_8.2.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068642/+attachment/5787303/+files/1_pytest_8.2.2-1_8.2.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068659] Re: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Changed in: pytest (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068659 Title: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protontricks/+bug/2068659/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068672] Re: ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Changed in: pytest (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068672 Title: ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipykernel/+bug/2068672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068674] Re: ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Changed in: pytest (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068674 Title: ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipython/+bug/2068674/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] Re: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
The culprit seems to be pytest setting the test._instance attribute to None instead of deleting the reference. It looks like upstream has the same conclusion [1]. This fixes the issue for python-flaky, but uncovered a separate issue for pytest-rerunfailures. Although there appears to be some related work upstream for this issue as well [2]. Please see the attached debdiff for the proposed fixes in [1] for pytest, which will resolve python-flaky's autopkgtest regression. I will separately look into whether [2] will fix the issue for pytest- rerunfailures. PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/pytest pytest autopkgtest results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-cpete- pytest/oracular/amd64/p/pytest/20240607_173550_99668@/log.gz python-flaky autopkgtest results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-cpete- pytest/oracular/amd64/p/python-flaky/20240607_173242_a6c20@/log.gz [1] https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/pull/12436 [2] https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-rerunfailures/commit/0ab54f00d68bb4feadae58d2f4e30f6663495571 ** Patch added: "pytest_8.2.2-1_8.2.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest-rerunfailures/+bug/2068642/+attachment/5787267/+files/pytest_8.2.2-1_8.2.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] Re: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Also affects: pytest-rerunfailures (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: - python-flaky's autopkgtests fail with python3.12 and pytest 8.2.2 [1]. - This is an issue with pytest itself and unittest test cases not being - torn down correctly [2]. + python-flaky's [1] and pytest-rerunfailures' [2] autopkgtests fail with + python3.12 and pytest 8.2.2 [1]. This is an issue with pytest itself and + unittest test cases not being torn down correctly [3]. [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/amd64/p/python-flaky/20240606_104752_a0cfa@/log.gz - [2] https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/12424 + [2] https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/amd64/p/pytest-rerunfailures/20240606_104615_632a4@/log.gz + [3] https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/12424 ** Description changed: python-flaky's [1] and pytest-rerunfailures' [2] autopkgtests fail with - python3.12 and pytest 8.2.2 [1]. This is an issue with pytest itself and + python3.12 and pytest 8.2.2. This is an issue with pytest itself and unittest test cases not being torn down correctly [3]. [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/amd64/p/python-flaky/20240606_104752_a0cfa@/log.gz [2] https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/amd64/p/pytest-rerunfailures/20240606_104615_632a4@/log.gz [3] https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/12424 ** Changed in: python-flaky (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New ** Changed in: pytest (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: pytest (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris Peterson (cpete) ** Summary changed: - python-flaky/3.8.1-2 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 + python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 and pytest-rerunfailures/12.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059354] Re: proposed migration pytest 8.0.2-1 vs joblib/1.3.2-1
Setting as fixed released as this was fixed in joblib/1.3.2-2 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1063966 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063966 ** Also affects: joblib (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063966 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: joblib (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: pytest (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059354 Title: proposed migration pytest 8.0.2-1 vs joblib/1.3.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/joblib/+bug/2059354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068674] Re: ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
Upstream had two relevant patches that fixed the issue which aren't in the packaging yet. I went ahead and cherry-picked those changes. Please see the provided debdiff. PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/ipython autopkgtest results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- oracular-cpete- ipython/oracular/amd64/i/ipython/20240607_022230_1318f@/result.tar ** Patch added: "ipython_8.20.0-1_8.20.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipython/+bug/2068674/+attachment/5787007/+files/ipython_8.20.0-1_8.20.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068674 Title: ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipython/+bug/2068674/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068659] Re: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
Second iteration. Patch contains full changes from the linked commit. ** Patch added: "1_protontricks_1.10.5-1_1.10.5-1ubuntu.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068659/+attachment/5787006/+files/1_protontricks_1.10.5-1_1.10.5-1ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068659 Title: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protontricks/+bug/2068659/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068672] Re: ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
Indeed it was just the nose-style tests. Upstream has unreleased changes to address this that I cherry-picked. Please see the attached debdiff. PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/ipykernel Autopkgtest results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- oracular-cpete- ipykernel/oracular/amd64/i/ipykernel/20240607_003157_a0a72@/log.gz ** Patch added: "ipykernel_6.29.3-1_6.29.3-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipykernel/+bug/2068672/+attachment/5787001/+files/ipykernel_6.29.3-1_6.29.3-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068672 Title: ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipykernel/+bug/2068672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068674] [NEW] ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
Public bug reported: ipython's autopkgtests fail against pytest 8+ since the upstream support changes haven't been packaged yet. https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest- oracular/oracular/amd64/i/ipython/20240606_104942_0c45c@/log.gz ** Affects: ipython (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: New ** Affects: pytest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: ipython (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: update-excuse ** Tags removed: update-e ** Tags added: update-excuse ** Changed in: ipython (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris Peterson (cpete) ** Also affects: pytest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1063945 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063945 ** Also affects: ipython (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063945 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068674 Title: ipython/8.20.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipython/+bug/2068674/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068672] Re: ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1047471 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1047471 ** Also affects: ipykernel (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1047471 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** No longer affects: ipykernel (Debian) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1070112 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070112 ** Also affects: ipykernel (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070112 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068672 Title: ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipykernel/+bug/2068672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068672] [NEW] ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
Public bug reported: ipykernel's autopkgtests are failing with pytest 8.2.2-1 A sample error: 162s === FAILURES === 162s test_asyncio_interrupt 162s 162s @pytest.mark.skipif(tornado.version_info < (5,), reason="only relevant on tornado 5") 162s def test_asyncio_interrupt(): 162s > assert KM is not None 162s E assert None is not None 162s 162s tests/test_eventloop.py:67: AssertionError After an initial look, it looks like some of tests rely on the nose-style test setup which is causing at least some of the errors. ** Affects: ipykernel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: New ** Affects: pytest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: ipykernel (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: update-excuse ** Also affects: pytest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068672 Title: ipykernel/6.29.3-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipykernel/+bug/2068672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068558] Re: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
I've forwarded the patch to upstream. Please see the new debdiff with the updated patch header. ** Patch added: "1_python-dtcwt_0.12.0-5_0.12.0-5ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-dtcwt/+bug/2068558/+attachment/5786920/+files/1_python-dtcwt_0.12.0-5_0.12.0-5ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068558 Title: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-dtcwt/+bug/2068558/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068659] Re: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
Please see the attached debiff. PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/protontricks/ Autopkgtest results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- oracular-cpete- protontricks/oracular/amd64/p/protontricks/20240606_203154_a25f9@/log.gz ** Patch added: "protontricks_1.10.5-1_1.10.5-1ubuntu.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068659/+attachment/5786919/+files/protontricks_1.10.5-1_1.10.5-1ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068659 Title: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protontricks/+bug/2068659/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068659] Re: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1063967 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063967 ** Also affects: protontricks (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063967 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068659 Title: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protontricks/+bug/2068659/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068659] [NEW] protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
Public bug reported: Protontricks autopkgtests fail due to changes in the caplog fixture in pytest 8. A corresponding upstream bug [1] was fixed in the latest version [2]. I will provide a debdiff with the cherry-picked fix for now. [1] https://github.com/Matoking/protontricks/issues/283 [2] https://github.com/Matoking/protontricks/commit/bb1da5a0ddcac1cbd577fd54fe947ff6ad1731bc ** Affects: protontricks (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: New ** Affects: pytest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse ** Also affects: pytest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068659 Title: protontricks/1.10.5-1 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/protontricks/+bug/2068659/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059330] Re: python-pytest-lazy-fixture: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8
** Also affects: pytest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059330 Title: python-pytest-lazy-fixture: autopkgtest regression with pytest 8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pycoast/+bug/2059330/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] Re: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Also affects: pytest (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pytest/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] Re: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
Bug in upstream about this issue: https://github.com/box/flaky/issues/212 ** Bug watch added: github.com/box/flaky/issues #212 https://github.com/box/flaky/issues/212 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flaky/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] Re: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Changed in: python-flaky (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) => (unassigned) ** Description changed: - python-flaky's autopkgtests fail with python3.12 and pytest 8+ [1]. It - appears upstream addressed a similar situation with [2]. + python-flaky's autopkgtests fail with python3.12 and pytest 8.2.2 [1]. + This is an issue with pytest itself and unittest test cases not being + torn down correctly [2]. [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/amd64/p/python-flaky/20240606_104752_a0cfa@/log.gz - [2] https://github.com/box/flaky/pull/201 + [2] https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/12424 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flaky/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] Re: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
** Description changed: - python-flaky's autopkgtests fail with python3.12 and pytest 8+ [1]. - There appears to be some fixes upstream [2] that are addressing the - situation. I'll provide a patch to cherry pick the changes. - + python-flaky's autopkgtests fail with python3.12 and pytest 8+ [1]. It + appears upstream addressed a similar situation with [2]. [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/amd64/p/python-flaky/20240606_104752_a0cfa@/log.gz [2] https://github.com/box/flaky/pull/201 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flaky/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068642] [NEW] python-flaky/3.8.1-2 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
Public bug reported: python-flaky's autopkgtests fail with python3.12 and pytest 8+ [1]. It appears upstream addressed a similar situation with [2]. [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/amd64/p/python-flaky/20240606_104752_a0cfa@/log.gz [2] https://github.com/box/flaky/pull/201 ** Affects: python-flaky (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: In Progress ** Tags: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068642 Title: python-flaky/3.8.1-2 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flaky/+bug/2068642/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068558] Re: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
Please see the attached debdiff for the proposed patch. PPA with the build: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/python- dtcwt/+packages Autopkg test results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-cpete- python-dtcwt/oracular/amd64/p/python-dtcwt/20240606_141901_33fec@/log.gz ** Patch added: "python-dtcwt_0.12.0-5_0.12.0-5ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-dtcwt/+bug/2068558/+attachment/5786842/+files/python-dtcwt_0.12.0-5_0.12.0-5ubuntu1.debdiff ** Changed in: python-dtcwt (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) => (unassigned) ** Description changed: Pytest 8 dropped support for nose style tests, which utilize "def setup()" module level functions. This is the cause of the autopkgtest errors like so: 1s === FAILURES === - 81s _ test_mandrill_loaded _ - 81s - 81s def test_mandrill_loaded(): - 81s > assert verif is not None - 81s E NameError: name 'verif' is not defined - 81s - 81s tests/test_againstmatlab.py:69: NameError + 81s _ test_mandrill_loaded _ + 81s + 81s def test_mandrill_loaded(): + 81s > assert verif is not None + 81s E NameError: name 'verif' is not defined + 81s + 81s tests/test_againstmatlab.py:69: NameError which are caused by the test setup function not being run. + + https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- + oracular/oracular/amd64/p/python-dtcwt/20240606_104626_b47f2@/log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068558 Title: python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 vs pytest/8.2.2-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-dtcwt/+bug/2068558/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068558] [NEW] python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
Public bug reported:
Pytest 8 dropped support for nose style tests, which utilize "def
setup()" module level functions. This is the cause of the autopkgtest
errors like so:
1s === FAILURES
===
81s _ test_mandrill_loaded
_
81s
81s def test_mandrill_loaded():
81s > assert verif is not None
81s E NameError: name 'verif' is not defined
81s
81s tests/test_againstmatlab.py:69: NameError
which are caused by the test setup function not being run.
** Affects: python-dtcwt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete)
Status: New
** Tags: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068558
Title:
python-dtcwt/0.12.0-5 vs pytest/8.2.2-1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-dtcwt/+bug/2068558/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068531] Re: skimage/0.22.0-3ubuntu1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu/+source/skimage/+git/skimage/+merge/466987 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068531 Title: skimage/0.22.0-3ubuntu1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skimage/+bug/2068531/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068540] Re: Please merge skimage 0.23.2-1 into oracular
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu/+source/skimage/+git/skimage/+merge/466987 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068540 Title: Please merge skimage 0.23.2-1 into oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skimage/+bug/2068540/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068540] Re: Please merge skimage 0.23.2-1 into oracular
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu/+source/skimage/+git/skimage/+merge/466985 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068540 Title: Please merge skimage 0.23.2-1 into oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skimage/+bug/2068540/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068531] Re: skimage/0.22.0-3ubuntu1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu/+source/skimage/+git/skimage/+merge/466985 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068531 Title: skimage/0.22.0-3ubuntu1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skimage/+bug/2068531/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068540] [NEW] Please merge skimage 0.23.2-1 into oracular
Public bug reported: Tracking bug ** Affects: skimage (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068540 Title: Please merge skimage 0.23.2-1 into oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skimage/+bug/2068540/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068521] Re: silx/2.0.1+dfsg-3 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1072655 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072655 ** Also affects: silx (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072655 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068521 Title: silx/2.0.1+dfsg-3 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/silx/+bug/2068521/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068531] [NEW] skimage/0.22.0-3ubuntu1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
Public bug reported:
Skimage's autopkgtests fail only on s390x with the following error after
moving to pytest8.2:
448s === FAILURES
===
448s __ test_imread_handle
__
448s
448s def test_imread_handle():
448s expected = np.load(fetch('data/chessboard_GRAY_U8.npy'))
448s with open(fetch('data/chessboard_GRAY_U16.tif'), 'rb') as fh:
448s img = imread(fh)
448s > assert img.dtype == np.uint16
448s E AssertionError: assert dtype('
448s E+ where dtype(' = np.uint16
448s
448s /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/skimage/io/tests/test_tifffile.py:48:
AssertionError
** Affects: skimage (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete)
Status: New
** Affects: skimage (Debian)
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Tags: update-excuse
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1071782
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071782
** Also affects: skimage (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071782
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068531
Title:
skimage/0.22.0-3ubuntu1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skimage/+bug/2068531/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068521] Re: silx/2.0.1+dfsg-3 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
Please see the provided debdiff. PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/silx Autopkgtest results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- oracular-cpete-silx/oracular/amd64/y/yt/20240605_210305_257b2@/log.gz ** Patch added: "silx_2.0.1+dfsg-3_2.0.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/silx/+bug/2068521/+attachment/5786511/+files/silx_2.0.1+dfsg-3_2.0.1+dfsg-3ubuntu1.debdiff ** Changed in: silx (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068521 Title: silx/2.0.1+dfsg-3 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/silx/+bug/2068521/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068521] [NEW] silx/2.0.1+dfsg-3 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
Public bug reported: silx autopkgtests fail with pytest 8.2 due to a known issue upstream: https://github.com/silx-kit/silx/issues/4128 There is an open PR upstream to fix the issue: https://github.com/silx-kit/silx/pull/4129/ I will provide a patch with the cherry-picked changes ** Affects: silx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068521 Title: silx/2.0.1+dfsg-3 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/silx/+bug/2068521/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068055] Re: proposed-migration terminado/0.18.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1072610 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072610 ** Also affects: terminado (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072610 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068055 Title: proposed-migration terminado/0.18.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminado/+bug/2068055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068046] Re: proposed-migration yt/4.3.0-1build1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1018675 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018675 ** Also affects: yt (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018675 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068046 Title: proposed-migration yt/4.3.0-1build1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yt/+bug/2068046/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068055] Re: proposed-migration terminado/0.18.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
new debdiff with updated changelog: - remove extraneous new line - add a description to the patch line ** Patch added: "1_terminado_0.18.0-1_0.18.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminado/+bug/2068055/+attachment/5786037/+files/1_terminado_0.18.0-1_0.18.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068055 Title: proposed-migration terminado/0.18.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminado/+bug/2068055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068055] Re: proposed-migration terminado/0.18.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
Attached is the patch to fix the above. PPA with builds: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/terminado PPA autopkgtest results: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-cpete- terminado/ ** Patch added: "terminado_0.18.0-1_0.18.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminado/+bug/2068055/+attachment/5786036/+files/terminado_0.18.0-1_0.18.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068055 Title: proposed-migration terminado/0.18.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminado/+bug/2068055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067948] Re: Rebuild diffoscope against liblz4-1
Rebased patch onto 270 ** Patch added: "diffoscope_270_270ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/diffoscope/+bug/2067948/+attachment/5786015/+files/diffoscope_270_270ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067948 Title: Rebuild diffoscope against liblz4-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/diffoscope/+bug/2067948/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068055] Re: proposed-migration terminado/0.18.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
** Description changed: There are two issues currently: - 1. Some pytest and tornado issue which I haven't figured out exactly the - cause, but running with all-proposed=1 solves the issue... + 1. The autopkgtest runners are not picking up the python3-pytest-timeout + dependency. My local qemu test runner will pick it up though. This + results in the following error: s autopkgtest [14:02:44]: test runtestsuite3: [--- - 78s ERROR: Unknown config option: timeout - 78s - 78s - 78s [1m= test session starts ==[0m - 78s platform linux -- Python 3.12.3, pytest-8.2.1, pluggy-1.5.0 - 78s rootdir: /tmp/autopkgtest.UvcccZ/build.UoZ/src - 78s configfile: pyproject.toml - 78s testpaths: tests/ - 78s collected 0 items / 2 errors - 78s - 78s ERRORS - 78s [31m[1m_ ERROR collecting tests/basic_test.py _[0m - 78s [0m[33m'[39;49;00m[33mtimeout[39;49;00m[33m'[39;49;00m [95mnot[39;49;00m found [95min[39;49;00m [04m[91m`[39;49;00mmarkers[04m[91m`[39;49;00m configuration option[90m[39;49;00m - 78s [31m[1m_ ERROR collecting tests/basic_test.py _[0m - 78s [0m[33m'[39;49;00m[33mtimeout[39;49;00m[33m'[39;49;00m [95mnot[39;49;00m found [95min[39;49;00m [04m[91m`[39;49;00mmarkers[04m[91m`[39;49;00m configuration option[90m[39;49;00m - 78s [36m[1m=== short test summary info [0m - 78s [31mERROR[0m tests/basic_test.py - Failed: 'timeout' not found in `markers` configuration option - 78s [31mERROR[0m tests/basic_test.py - Failed: 'timeout' not found in `markers` configuration option - 78s [31m== [31m[1m2 errors[0m[31m in 0.24s[0m[31m ===[0m - 78s autopkgtest [14:02:45]: test runtestsuite3: ---] - 79s autopkgtest [14:02:46]: test runtestsuite3: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - - - - - 79s runtestsuite3FAIL non-zero exit status 4 - 79s autopkgtest [14:02:46]: summary - 79s runtestsuite3FAIL non-zero exit status 4 + 78s ERROR: Unknown config option: timeout + 78s + 78s + 78s [1m= test session starts ==[0m + 78s platform linux -- Python 3.12.3, pytest-8.2.1, pluggy-1.5.0 + 78s rootdir: /tmp/autopkgtest.UvcccZ/build.UoZ/src + 78s configfile: pyproject.toml + 78s testpaths: tests/ + 78s collected 0 items / 2 errors + 78s + 78s ERRORS + 78s [31m[1m_ ERROR collecting tests/basic_test.py _[0m + 78s [0m[33m'[39;49;00m[33mtimeout[39;49;00m[33m'[39;49;00m [95mnot[39;49;00m found [95min[39;49;00m [04m[91m`[39;49;00mmarkers[04m[91m`[39;49;00m configuration option[90m[39;49;00m + 78s [31m[1m_ ERROR collecting tests/basic_test.py _[0m + 78s [0m[33m'[39;49;00m[33mtimeout[39;49;00m[33m'[39;49;00m [95mnot[39;49;00m found [95min[39;49;00m [04m[91m`[39;49;00mmarkers[04m[91m`[39;49;00m configuration option[90m[39;49;00m + 78s [36m[1m=== short test summary info [0m + 78s [31mERROR[0m tests/basic_test.py - Failed: 'timeout' not found in `markers` configuration option + 78s [31mERROR[0m tests/basic_test.py - Failed: 'timeout' not found in `markers` configuration option + 78s [31m== [31m[1m2 errors[0m[31m in 0.24s[0m[31m ===[0m + 78s autopkgtest [14:02:45]: test runtestsuite3: ---] + 79s autopkgtest [14:02:46]: test runtestsuite3: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - - - - + 79s runtestsuite3FAIL non-zero exit status 4 + 79s autopkgtest [14:02:46]: summary + 79s runtestsuite3FAIL non-zero exit status 4 - - 2. The above is hiding a PytestUnraisableExceptionWarning error which was solved by upstream in https://github.com/jupyter/terminado/commit/e2c1b0830b5f5994bdfeb4d2c2d3e51e114e40b9#diff-e6bcf9c8a7eb9d493e604bcae41818b790764d53e4d1ad3b0a1763004f94067a + 2. The above is hiding a PytestUnraisableExceptionWarning error which + was solved by upstream in + https://github.com/jupyter/terminado/commit/e2c1b0830b5f5994bdfeb4d2c2d3e51e114e40b9#diff-e6bcf9c8a7eb9d493e604bcae41818b790764d53e4d1ad3b0a1763004f94067a ** Description changed: There are two issues currently: - 1. The autopkgtest runners are not picking up the python3-pytest-timeout - dependency. My local qemu test runner will pick it up though. This - results in the following error: + 1. The debian/tests/control file
[Bug 2068046] Re: proposed-migration yt/4.3.0-1build1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
The provided patch is a minimal change to allow the current tests to pass with pytest 8.2. Upstream has more changes of this kind, but I didn't think it was necessary to replicate all of them. PPA with build: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/yt/+packages Autopkgtest results for amd64: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-cpete-yt/ ** Patch added: "yt_4.3.0-1build1_4.3.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yt/+bug/2068046/+attachment/5785930/+files/yt_4.3.0-1build1_4.3.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Changed in: yt (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068046 Title: proposed-migration yt/4.3.0-1build1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yt/+bug/2068046/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068055] [NEW] proposed-migration terminado/0.18.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
Public bug reported: There are two issues currently: 1. Some pytest and tornado issue which I haven't figured out exactly the cause, but running with all-proposed=1 solves the issue... s autopkgtest [14:02:44]: test runtestsuite3: [--- 78s ERROR: Unknown config option: timeout 78s 78s 78s [1m= test session starts ==[0m 78s platform linux -- Python 3.12.3, pytest-8.2.1, pluggy-1.5.0 78s rootdir: /tmp/autopkgtest.UvcccZ/build.UoZ/src 78s configfile: pyproject.toml 78s testpaths: tests/ 78s collected 0 items / 2 errors 78s 78s ERRORS 78s [31m[1m_ ERROR collecting tests/basic_test.py _[0m 78s [0m[33m'[39;49;00m[33mtimeout[39;49;00m[33m'[39;49;00m [95mnot[39;49;00m found [95min[39;49;00m [04m[91m`[39;49;00mmarkers[04m[91m`[39;49;00m configuration option[90m[39;49;00m 78s [31m[1m_ ERROR collecting tests/basic_test.py _[0m 78s [0m[33m'[39;49;00m[33mtimeout[39;49;00m[33m'[39;49;00m [95mnot[39;49;00m found [95min[39;49;00m [04m[91m`[39;49;00mmarkers[04m[91m`[39;49;00m configuration option[90m[39;49;00m 78s [36m[1m=== short test summary info [0m 78s [31mERROR[0m tests/basic_test.py - Failed: 'timeout' not found in `markers` configuration option 78s [31mERROR[0m tests/basic_test.py - Failed: 'timeout' not found in `markers` configuration option 78s [31m== [31m[1m2 errors[0m[31m in 0.24s[0m[31m ===[0m 78s autopkgtest [14:02:45]: test runtestsuite3: ---] 79s autopkgtest [14:02:46]: test runtestsuite3: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - - - - 79s runtestsuite3FAIL non-zero exit status 4 79s autopkgtest [14:02:46]: summary 79s runtestsuite3FAIL non-zero exit status 4 2. The above is hiding a PytestUnraisableExceptionWarning error which was solved by upstream in https://github.com/jupyter/terminado/commit/e2c1b0830b5f5994bdfeb4d2c2d3e51e114e40b9#diff-e6bcf9c8a7eb9d493e604bcae41818b790764d53e4d1ad3b0a1763004f94067a ** Affects: terminado (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068055 Title: proposed-migration terminado/0.18.0-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/terminado/+bug/2068055/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068051] Re: proposed-migration vdirsyncer/0.19.2-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
After further investigation this was actually a regression with python3-pytest-asyncio. re-triggered tests with all-proposed. ** Changed in: vdirsyncer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Tags removed: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068051 Title: proposed-migration vdirsyncer/0.19.2-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vdirsyncer/+bug/2068051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068051] [NEW] proposed-migration vdirsyncer/0.19.2-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
Public bug reported: Autopkgtests have regressed with pytest8 ** Affects: vdirsyncer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: New ** Tags: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068051 Title: proposed-migration vdirsyncer/0.19.2-1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vdirsyncer/+bug/2068051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068046] Re: proposed-migration yt/4.3.0-1build1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068046 Title: proposed-migration yt/4.3.0-1build1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yt/+bug/2068046/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068046] [NEW] proposed-migration yt/4.3.0-1build1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2
Public bug reported: yt autopkgtests fail with the latest version of pytest: === FAILURES === __ test_cylindrical_ray_trace __ def test_cylindrical_ray_trace(): for pair in point_pairs: p1, p2 = pair p1cart, p2cart = _cyl2cart(pair) pathlen = np.sqrt(np.sum((p2cart - p1cart) ** 2)) > t, s, rztheta, inds = cylindrical_ray_trace(p1, p2, left_grid, right_grid) yt/utilities/lib/tests/test_alt_ray_tracers.py:74: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > rleft = left_edges[:,0] E TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable yt/utilities/lib/alt_ray_tracers.pyx:111: TypeError This is likely due to the deprecation of nose style test support: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/9886 ** Affects: yt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068046 Title: proposed-migration yt/4.3.0-1build1 vs pytest/8.2.1-2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yt/+bug/2068046/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067948] Re: Rebuild diffoscope against liblz4-1
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1072575 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072575 ** Also affects: diffoscope (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072575 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067948 Title: Rebuild diffoscope against liblz4-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/diffoscope/+bug/2067948/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067948] Re: Rebuild diffoscope against liblz4-1
** Patch added: "diffoscope_269_269ubuntu.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/diffoscope/+bug/2067948/+attachment/5785674/+files/diffoscope_269_269ubuntu.debdiff ** Changed in: diffoscope (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067948 Title: Rebuild diffoscope against liblz4-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/diffoscope/+bug/2067948/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067948] [NEW] Rebuild diffoscope against liblz4-1
Public bug reported: The package lz4 recently dropped the liblz4-tool transition package. Diffoscope is currently built against the liblz4-tool binary and needs to be rebuilt. ** Affects: diffoscope (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067948 Title: Rebuild diffoscope against liblz4-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/diffoscope/+bug/2067948/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067775] Re: subiquity package-hook is outdated
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu/+source/apport/+git/apport/+merge/454563 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067775 Title: subiquity package-hook is outdated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/2067775/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067775] [NEW] subiquity package-hook is outdated
Public bug reported: The Subiquity package hook in Apport has not been updated to collect the type of information we are typically interested in (e.g. /var/log/installer/subiquity-*). ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067775 Title: subiquity package-hook is outdated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/2067775/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067654] Re: [MIR] libsub-prototype-perl
** Description changed: - + [Availability] + The package libsub-prototype-perl is already in Ubuntu universe. + The package libsub-prototype-perl builds for the architectures it is designed to work on. + It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x, i386 + Link to package: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsub-prototype-perl + + [Rationale] + The package libsub-prototype-perl is required in Ubuntu main as a Test and + Runtime dependency of libsub-override-perl, a package already in main. This + dependency was recently introduced in libsub-override-perl version 0.11-1 + (currently in Oracular proposed). + + There doesn't appear to be alternative packages with the same functionality + available in the archive. + + The package libsub-prototype-perl is required in Ubuntu main no later than + August 15th 2024 (Feature Freeze for OO) so that new version of + libsub-override-perl can migrate to the release pocket before release. + + [Security] + No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + + The package is a very simple Perl library/module. After inspecting the package, + I found: + + - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries + - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` + - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs + - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). + - Package does not expose any external endpoints + - Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software +(filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) + + The package does not use security related algorithms, insecure or + otherwise. + + [Quality assurance - function/usage] + The package works well right after install + + -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067654 Title: [MIR] libsub-prototype-perl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsub-prototype-perl/+bug/2067654/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067654] [NEW] [MIR] libsub-prototype-perl
Public bug reported: ** Affects: libsub-prototype-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067654 Title: [MIR] libsub-prototype-perl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsub-prototype-perl/+bug/2067654/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064680] Re: Please merge needrestart 3.6-8 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
** Changed in: needrestart (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: needrestart (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064680 Title: Please merge needrestart 3.6-8 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/needrestart/+bug/2064680/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064680] Re: Please merge needrestart 3.6-8 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~cpete/ubuntu/+source/needrestart/+git/needrestart/+merge/465736 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064680 Title: Please merge needrestart 3.6-8 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/needrestart/+bug/2064680/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064680] [NEW] Please merge needrestart 3.6-8 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: tracking bug ** Affects: needrestart (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064680 Title: Please merge needrestart 3.6-8 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/needrestart/+bug/2064680/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055418] Re: autoinstall crashing on 24.04 desktop daily build
Hi Jeff, apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Based on the crash report provided it looks like it was a bug with the tracker package. I think this should be sorted by now though! ** Changed in: subiquity Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055418 Title: autoinstall crashing on 24.04 desktop daily build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2055418/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060335] Re: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64
That works! Thanks Andreas. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060335 Title: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/2060335/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060894] Re: dialogue won't start, high cpu usage
Could you provide the logs from /var/log/installer/ please? I've yet to run into this on my tests. ** Changed in: subiquity Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060894 Title: dialogue won't start, high cpu usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2060894/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060335] Re: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64
Yes, a no-change rebuild fixes the issue. Please see attached debdiff for the fix. I have provided a PPA with the build and tests: PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/upower arm64 autopkgtest log: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble-cpete- upower/noble/arm64/u/upower/20240407_191552_37f4e@/log.gz arm64 autopkgtests artifacts: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble-cpete- upower/noble/arm64/u/upower/20240407_191552_37f4e@/artifacts.tar.gz ** Patch added: "upower_1.90.2-8build3_1.90.2-8build4.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/2060335/+attachment/5762206/+files/upower_1.90.2-8build3_1.90.2-8build4.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060335 Title: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/2060335/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060244] Re: autokpgtest failure astroml/1.0.2-3 vs numpy/1.25+
Please see the attached debdiff for the fix.
I built and tested this in a PPA with -proposed enabled in the build and
all-proposed in the autopkgtest:
Build PPA: https://launchpad.net/~cpete/+archive/ubuntu/astroml
Autopkgtest artifacts:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble-cpete-
astroml/noble/amd64/a/astroml/20240405_023032_3b686@/artifacts.tar.gz
Autopkgtest log: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
noble-cpete-astroml/noble/amd64/a/astroml/20240405_023032_3b686@/log.gz
** Patch added: "astroml_1.0.2-3_1.0.2-3ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/astroml/+bug/2060244/+attachment/5761610/+files/astroml_1.0.2-3_1.0.2-3ubuntu1.debdiff
** Changed in: astroml (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => New
** Changed in: astroml (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060244
Title:
autokpgtest failure astroml/1.0.2-3 vs numpy/1.25+
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/astroml/+bug/2060244/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060251] [NEW] module not found: numpy.distutils
Public bug reported: NumPy has deprecated numpy.distutils in NumPy 1.23.0 for Python3.12 [0]. This relates to LP: #2049369 but may not be the only related bug. An example autopkgtest failure can be seen in [1]. [0] https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/distutils_status_migration.html [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble/noble/arm64/c/cython-legacy/20240404_174332_60c06@/log.gz ** Affects: cython-legacy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060251 Title: module not found: numpy.distutils To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cython-legacy/+bug/2060251/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060244] Re: autokpgtest failure astroml/1.0.2-3 vs numpy/1.25+
In progress, awaiting ppa build to publish and will queue autopkgtests ** Changed in: astroml (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060244 Title: autokpgtest failure astroml/1.0.2-3 vs numpy/1.25+ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/astroml/+bug/2060244/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060244] Re: autokpgtest failure astroml/1.0.2-3 vs numpy/1.25+
Thanks for the sponsorship ginggs! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060244 Title: autokpgtest failure astroml/1.0.2-3 vs numpy/1.25+ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/astroml/+bug/2060244/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060335] Re: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64
I estimate another ncr could fix the issue. Building and testing in a ppa. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060335 Title: upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upower/+bug/2060335/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060335] [NEW] upower/1.90.2-8build3 autopkgtest failure on arm64
Public bug reported: autopkgtests fail, only on arm64, after a no-change-rebuild, with the following output: 689s [32mTI:22:39:23 [34mHandling SIGTERM 689s [0m. 689s == 689s ERROR: test_daemon_restart (__main__.Tests.test_daemon_restart) 689s -- 689s Traceback (most recent call last): 689s File "/usr/lib/python3.12/shutil.py", line 785, in rmtree 689s _rmtree_safe_fd(fd, path, onexc) 689s File "/usr/lib/python3.12/shutil.py", line 717, in _rmtree_safe_fd 689s onexc(os.unlink, fullname, err) 689s File "/usr/lib/python3.12/shutil.py", line 715, in _rmtree_safe_fd 689s os.unlink(entry.name, dir_fd=topfd) 689s FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'history-time-full-G935_Gaming_Headset.dat.KL0SL2' 689s 689s == 689s FAIL: test_daemon_restart (__main__.Tests.test_daemon_restart) 689s -- 689s Traceback (most recent call last): 689s File "/usr/libexec/upower/integration-test.py", line 2558, in test_daemon_restart 689s self.stop_daemon() 689s File "/usr/libexec/upower/integration-test.py", line 239, in stop_daemon 689s self.assertEqual(self.daemon.wait(timeout=5.0), 0) 689s AssertionError: -15 != 0 689s 689s == 689s FAIL: test_daemon_restart (__main__.Tests.test_daemon_restart) 689s -- 689s Traceback (most recent call last): 689s File "/usr/libexec/upower/integration-test.py", line 173, in tearDown 689s self.stop_daemon() 689s File "/usr/libexec/upower/integration-test.py", line 239, in stop_daemon 689s self.assertEqual(self.daemon.wait(timeout=5.0), 0) 689s AssertionError: -15 != 0 689s 689s -- 689s Ran 66 tests in 194.378s 689s 689s FAILED (failures=2, errors=1) full log: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- noble/noble/arm64/u/upower/20240405_224518_5cff1@/log.gz These test passed in the previous version: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble/noble/arm64/u/upower/20240405_224754_d187c@/log.gz ** Affects: upower (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Chris Peterson (cpete) Status: In Progress ** Tags: update-excuse ** Description changed: - autopkgtests fail, only on arm64, with the following output: + autopkgtests fail, only on arm64, after a no-change-rebuild, with the + following output: 689s [32mTI:22:39:23 [34mHandling SIGTERM 689s [0m. 689s == 689s ERROR: test_daemon_restart (__main__.Tests.test_daemon_restart) 689s -- 689s Traceback (most recent call last): 689s File "/usr/lib/python3.12/shutil.py", line 785, in rmtree 689s _rmtree_safe_fd(fd, path, onexc) 689s File "/usr/lib/python3.12/shutil.py", line 717, in _rmtree_safe_fd 689s onexc(os.unlink, fullname, err) 689s File "/usr/lib/python3.12/shutil.py", line 715, in _rmtree_safe_fd 689s os.unlink(entry.name, dir_fd=topfd) 689s FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'history-time-full-G935_Gaming_Headset.dat.KL0SL2' - 689s + 689s 689s == 689s FAIL: test_daemon_restart (__main__.Tests.test_daemon_restart) 689s -- 689s Traceback (most recent call last): 689s File "/usr/libexec/upower/integration-test.py", line 2558, in test_daemon_restart 689s self.stop_daemon() 689s File "/usr/libexec/upower/integration-test.py", line 239, in stop_daemon 689s self.assertEqual(self.daemon.wait(timeout=5.0), 0) 689s AssertionError: -15 != 0 - 689s + 689s 689s == 689s FAIL: test_daemon_restart (__main__.Tests.test_daemon_restart) 689s -- 689s Traceback (most recent call last): 689s File "/usr/libexec/upower/integration-test.py", line 173, in tearDown 689s self.stop_daemon() 689s File "/usr/libexec/upower/integration-test.py", line 239, in stop_daemon 689s self.assertEqual(self.daemon.wait(timeout=5.0), 0) 689s AssertionError: -15 != 0 - 689s + 689s 689s -- 689s Ran 66 tests in 194.378s - 689s + 689s 689s FAILED (failures=2,
