[Bug 1917896] [NEW] dependency issue
Public bug reported: the package in Bionic has a Recommends package of "smartctl", which doesn't exist. I believe the package name should be smartmontools as that's what provides the smartctl binary. Additionally, the program crashes with default options if the smartctl binary is not installed, so smartmontools should be required. ** Affects: stressant (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917896 Title: dependency issue To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stressant/+bug/1917896/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1862977] [NEW] exportfs non-zero exit code without error message
Public bug reported: Ubuntu Server 18.04, upgraded from 16.04, upgraded from 10.04. /etc/exports had things like /path hostname(rw) 10.212.1.9(rw) where the ip is for that hostname and all was fine, even when DNS wasn't working. something seems to have changed since first upgrading to 18.04 where exportfs -r gives what appears to be a warning "duplicated export entries", but has now has a non-zero exit code, which causes the server to not start. even with -v this still looks like a warning, it does not say anything about the exports not being applied or any hint that the processes was considered a failure. ** Affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862977 Title: exportfs non-zero exit code without error message To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1862977/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1433761] Re: apt-key and add-apt-repository don't honor Acquire::http::Proxy
this is still not working quite fully for add-apt-repository on a new clean install of 18.04.1. it may be working for http only, but for https you still need to manually provide the https_proxy env var. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1433761 Title: apt-key and add-apt-repository don't honor Acquire::http::Proxy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1433761/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1719889] Re: internal-use-only SIDs being mapped to GIDs on users
net groupmap list only shows Administrators and Users. the problem does not exist on 18.04. I realize it's not a bug "in ubuntu", but in the version of samba that ubuntu 16.04 is using. from experience I can tell you that reporting it to samba is just going to result in them saying "compile your own newer samba version", which does nothing to get ubunut's LTS samba package to not give this message. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1719889 Title: internal-use-only SIDs being mapped to GIDs on users To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1719889/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1719889] [NEW] internal-use-only SIDs being mapped to GIDs on users
Public bug reported: Ubuntu server 16.04, samba/winbind package version 4.3.11+dfsg- 0ubuntu0.16.04.11 When logging in via SSH as a domain user the error "groups: cannot find name for group ID 2005" is displayed. running "id $username" also shows this 2005 group with no name. "wbinfo -G 2005" returns "S-1-18-1", no other lookups for 2005 or S-1-18-1 return anything. MS documentation lists S-1-18-1 as AUTHENTICATION_AUTHORITY_ASSERTED_IDENTITY, which should not be exposed in the manner that it is here. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: winbind 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-31.50-generic 4.4.13 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-31-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zcommon znvpair zavl ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Sep 27 08:25:47 2017 NmbdLog: OtherFailedConnect: Yes ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SambaServerRegression: No SmbConfIncluded: Yes SmbLog: SourcePackage: samba UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-05-09 (505 days ago) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1719889 Title: internal-use-only SIDs being mapped to GIDs on users To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1719889/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1349128] Re: Ubuntu 14.04 lock screen doesn't accept keyboard input and sends it back to the underlying window (until using indicators)
I see this is being treated as critical, but does that also mean it is being treated as a security issue? I found my password in plain text after applying the work around, and if that were a chat application that's a pretty serious security breach. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1349128 Title: Ubuntu 14.04 lock screen doesn't accept keyboard input and sends it back to the underlying window (until using indicators) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1349128/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] Re: Can't mirror more than 640x480
finally fully upgraded to 14.04LTS and 1280x720 is still not the list of resolutions supported for the laptop's panel, thus certain projectors and displays cannot be mirrored at more than 640x480. when 1280x720 is manually added using xrandr, it works as expected. how can 1280x720 be permanently added without generating a conf? I use this with too many different displays for that to be acceptable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] Re: Can't mirror more than 640x480
I'm not sure I understand. the issue still exists on Trusty, but I am willing to upgrade this one system to Trusty now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] Re: Can't mirror more than 640x480
Can't mirror more than 640x480 was only a symptom of the real problem. The real problem is that the 1280x720 option that I had been accustomed to on my hardware is missing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] Re: Can't mirror more than 640x480
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected compiz-0.9 reproducible trusty ubuntu ** Description changed: i3 cpu, lspci lists as vga Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) trying to mirror lcd and HDMI. only option is 640x480. tried increasing video ram in BIOS, 512MB won't boot, all smaller values do not change the options. I cam mirror at 720P in windows, so the hardware should be capable. + --- + .tmp.unity.support.test.0: + + ApportVersion: 2.12.7-0ubuntu6 + Architecture: amd64 + CasperVersion: 1.336ubuntu1 + CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' + CompositorRunning: compiz + CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0' + CompositorUnredirectFSW: true + CurrentDesktop: Unity + DistUpgraded: Fresh install + DistroCodename: trusty + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 + DistroVariant: ubuntu + ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes + GraphicsCard: + Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0116] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) +Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:108d] + LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Alpha amd64 (20140109) + MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. X202E + MarkForUpload: True + Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.907-0ubuntu1 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz.efi file=/cdrom/preseed/username.seed boot=casper quiet splash -- + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-1.16-generic 3.13.0-rc7 + Tags: trusty ubuntu reproducible compiz-0.9 + Uname: Linux 3.13.0-1-generic x86_64 + UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) + UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo + dmi.bios.date: 09/19/2012 + dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. + dmi.bios.version: X202E.204 + dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 + dmi.board.name: X202E + dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. + dmi.board.version: 1.0 + dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag + dmi.chassis.type: 10 + dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. + dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 + dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrX202E.204:bd09/19/2012:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnX202E:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnX202E:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:ct10:cvr1.0: + dmi.product.name: X202E + dmi.product.version: 1.0 + dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. + version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.10+13.10.20131011-0ubuntu1 + version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A + version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.50-1 + version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 10.0.1-1ubuntu2 + version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A + version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 10.0.1-1ubuntu2 + version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.14.5-1ubuntu2 + version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.8.2-1ubuntu1 + version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.2.0-0ubuntu10 + version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.907-0ubuntu1 + version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.10-1ubuntu1 + xserver.bootTime: Fri Jan 10 03:18:06 2014 + xserver.configfile: default + xserver.errors: + + xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log + xserver.outputs: + product id 12380 + vendor AUO + xserver.version: 2:1.14.5-1ubuntu2 ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945001/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] CurrentDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945003/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] Dependencies.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945004/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] BootLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: BootLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945002/+files/BootLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] LightdmDisplayLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: LightdmDisplayLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945007/+files/LightdmDisplayLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] Lsusb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945010/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] DpkgLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: DpkgLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945005/+files/DpkgLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] xdpyinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945020/+files/xdpyinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] LightdmLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: LightdmLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945008/+files/LightdmLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] UdevLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945016/+files/UdevLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] GconfCompiz.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: GconfCompiz.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945006/+files/GconfCompiz.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945013/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] Re: Can't mirror more than 640x480
using xrandr to add the 1280x720 resolution does work and looks fine, but it does not persist reboots, and there is no option I can find in the Displays tool to at add it as implied. Since it was an option in windows I'm assuming there's something different about how the panel and/or cards supported resolutions are detected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] UnitySupportTest.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UnitySupportTest.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945017/+files/UnitySupportTest.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] Xrandr.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945019/+files/Xrandr.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945015/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945014/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] Lspci.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945009/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945011/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] xserver.devices.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: xserver.devices.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945021/+files/xserver.devices.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] XorgLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945018/+files/XorgLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] ProcEnviron.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcEnviron.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391/+attachment/3945012/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922262] Re: X -configure fails, leaves valid conf anyway
I no longer have the hardware to test it, but unless the Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices. error condition was changed to a warning then i suspect the issue still exists. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922262 Title: X -configure fails, leaves valid conf anyway To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/922262/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922262] Re: X -configure fails, leaves valid conf anyway
additionally, this was for configuring an LTSP thin client, apport is not available. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922262 Title: X -configure fails, leaves valid conf anyway To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/922262/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265921] [NEW] bacula-traymonitor fails to launch
Public bug reported: after creating a config file and verifying with bacula-traymonitor -t, launching bacula-traymonitor produces no GUI. I'm guessing it goes to the tray, but Unity doens't have a tray. Ideally it would go to the indicator area like indicator-multiload does. but an acceptable workaround would be to just display the GUI and then exit on close, like a normal application. an optional flag to do this would be fine if detecting a tray is unreliable.. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: bacula-traymonitor 5.2.6+dfsg-9ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-14.21-generic 3.11.7 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-14-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jan 3 15:21:38 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-03-31 (1374 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Beta amd64 (20100318) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: bacula UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-11-14 (50 days ago) ** Affects: bacula (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug saucy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265921 Title: bacula-traymonitor fails to launch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1265921/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1265856] [NEW] init.d/isc-dhcp-server and init/isc-dhcp-server.conf out of sync
Public bug reported: /etc/init/isc-dhcp-server.conf and /etc/init.d/isc-dhcp-server have a lot of differences, including different PID locations and conf file detection. if /etc/init.d/isc-dhcp-server is deprecated, it should be modified to reflect this. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: isc-dhcp-server (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-14.21-generic 3.11.7 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-14-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jan 3 10:03:40 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-03-31 (1374 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Beta amd64 (20100318) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: isc-dhcp UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-11-14 (50 days ago) ** Affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug saucy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265856 Title: init.d/isc-dhcp-server and init/isc-dhcp-server.conf out of sync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1265856/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265856] Re: init.d/isc-dhcp-server and init/isc-dhcp-server.conf out of sync
** Attachment removed: ProcEnviron.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1265856/+attachment/3939900/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265856 Title: init.d/isc-dhcp-server and init/isc-dhcp-server.conf out of sync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1265856/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265856] Re: init.d/isc-dhcp-server and init/isc-dhcp-server.conf out of sync
report was done from a desktop since instructions on submitting direct are hidden in far too much text. actual install media was 13.10 mini iso, minimal install, then ltsp- server-standalone package installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265856 Title: init.d/isc-dhcp-server and init/isc-dhcp-server.conf out of sync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1265856/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265856] Re: init.d/isc-dhcp-server and init/isc-dhcp-server.conf out of sync
so why do sysv scripts still do something predictable for other packages, like samba? it's quite confusing to old schoolers that use multiple distros to have a script run and fail in bizarre ways. copying smbd's if upstart, bail check would be acceptable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265856 Title: init.d/isc-dhcp-server and init/isc-dhcp-server.conf out of sync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1265856/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265856] Re: init.d/isc-dhcp-server and init/isc-dhcp-server.conf out of sync
so it's less invalid and more 'wontfix' because it's complicated. guess i'll mod my sysv so i won't make the mistake in the future. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265856 Title: init.d/isc-dhcp-server and init/isc-dhcp-server.conf out of sync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1265856/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265921] [NEW] bacula-traymonitor fails to launch
Public bug reported: after creating a config file and verifying with bacula-traymonitor -t, launching bacula-traymonitor produces no GUI. I'm guessing it goes to the tray, but Unity doens't have a tray. Ideally it would go to the indicator area like indicator-multiload does. but an acceptable workaround would be to just display the GUI and then exit on close, like a normal application. an optional flag to do this would be fine if detecting a tray is unreliable.. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: bacula-traymonitor 5.2.6+dfsg-9ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-14.21-generic 3.11.7 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-14-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jan 3 15:21:38 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-03-31 (1374 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Beta amd64 (20100318) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: bacula UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-11-14 (50 days ago) ** Affects: bacula (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug saucy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265921 Title: bacula-traymonitor fails to launch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bacula/+bug/1265921/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 490194] Re: /sbin/modemmanager is too aggressive managing devices that aren't known to be modems
this is also affecting me, udev ignore rule for BeagleBone rev A3:
ATTRS{idVendor}==0403, ATTRS{idProduct}==a6d0,
ENV{ID_MM_DEVICE_IGNORE}=1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490194
Title:
/sbin/modemmanager is too aggressive managing devices that aren't
known to be modems
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/+bug/490194/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] Re: Can't mirror more than 640x480
X.0.log only seems to show the active modeline when I plug in the projector. but I see what's going on now, my list of resolutions on each display only shares 640x480. I'm pretty sure on windows I had a 1280x720 option on my laptop panel. is creating an xorg.conf the only method to add a new mode to the drop down? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] Re: Can't mirror more than 640x480
I'll get the log later, laptop is not with me. to clarify, the external is a full HD projector, and JustWorks with windows on this laptop. The 640x480 option is the only option that shows as soon as I check the mirror box. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1248391] [NEW] Can't mirror more than 640x480
Public bug reported: i3 cpu, lspci lists as vga Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) trying to mirror lcd and HDMI. only option is 640x480. tried increasing video ram in BIOS, 512MB won't boot, all smaller values do not change the options. I cam mirror at 720P in windows, so the hardware should be capable. ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1248391 Title: Can't mirror more than 640x480 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1248391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1053173] Re: minidlna crashes on boot when no active network connection
kapetr, the bug is posted on the minidlna package. maybe it's due to a compile option, or an ubuntu patch, I don't know. etiquette is to post the bug on the package and let the package maintainer either fix it or post the bug upstream. though it seems that the maintainer may no longer be active, so I don't know where that leaves us. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053173 Title: minidlna crashes on boot when no active network connection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/minidlna/+bug/1053173/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1058884] Re: Race condition in py_compile corrupts pyc files
I've done a 12.10, and now 13.04 update since, the issue has not repeated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058884 Title: Race condition in py_compile corrupts pyc files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.7/+bug/1058884/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 864479] Re: System goes to hibernate or suspend even when set to Don't suspend
it did not suspend overnight. there do seem to be several option resetting to defaults or failing to migrate, not just related to power management. maybe the issues is actually in gconf's upgrade processing? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/864479 Title: System goes to hibernate or suspend even when set to Don't suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/864479/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 864479] Re: System goes to hibernate or suspend even when set to Don't suspend
I just upgraded from Lucid to Precise and now my desktop suspends when idle, it never did before. power applet looks right, switching to suspend and back doens't affect it. My screen saver is also completely gone, but that's another issue. I'll try the other suggestions here and update, but I wanted to put this note in the the bug still exists at least for upgrades. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/864479 Title: System goes to hibernate or suspend even when set to Don't suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/864479/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1058884] Re: do-release-upgrade crashed with EOFError in /usr/lib/ubuntu-release-upgrader/check-new-release: EOF read where not expected
I don't agree that it's incomplete. there exists possibility that python3-distupgrade will fail to properly install but not provide any error, despite the md5sum being wrong. re-installing corrects it. I can say with absolute certainty that my hardware was not at fault. no other packages had an issue, and re-install worked for reasons I do not understand. the question is, why does it allow a file to have the wrong md5sum and not at least complain about it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058884 Title: do-release-upgrade crashed with EOFError in /usr/lib/ubuntu-release- upgrader/check-new-release: EOF read where not expected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1058884/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1165910] [NEW] openssl:i386 package conflicts with openssl, preventing 32bit packages that need it from working.
Public bug reported: this is on 12.04 x64, probably affects other versions. maybe there's a good technical reason for it? maybe it's a packaging oversight? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: openssl:i386 (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-26.42-generic 3.5.7.6 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-26-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Apr 7 17:18:32 2013 MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openssl UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165910 Title: openssl:i386 package conflicts with openssl, preventing 32bit packages that need it from working. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1165910/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382602] Re: tail piped to awk not processing
I think 3 years for anyone to issue any sort of response to the 3 people that mention they are affected by this change in behavior of default installed tools says a lot about how much Ubuntu cares about the issue, so it quite obvious that it doesn't matter what their users think anymore. it's a sad time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382602 Title: tail piped to awk not processing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mawk/+bug/382602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382602] Re: tail piped to awk not processing
the very definition of a regression bugs is when an upgrade changes a behavior in a such way that a function no longer works the same way. this is a regression bug. Plain as day. -W interactive is an unintuitive solution, and it's not exactly clear what's going on even in 12.10's man page. and how long would I have had to wait for the buffer to catch up and show my output? I don't see that clearly documented. hell this was 3 years ago, I don't even remember what I was doing it for. replacing mawk with gawk was a cleaner solution that adding -W interactive to who knows how many scripts. replacing the defacto gnu awk with something that behaves very differently is a problem. IMO, mawk is still broken. this is poor behavior for a scripting helper tool. buffering's fine and all, but it should be finite, and for piped input, a couple seconds tops. also, does fflush() not actually flush? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382602 Title: tail piped to awk not processing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mawk/+bug/382602/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1058884] Re: do-release-upgrade crashed with EOFError in /usr/lib/ubuntu-release-upgrader/check-new-release: EOF read where not expected
issue has not returned, must have been fixed by some other commit -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058884 Title: do-release-upgrade crashed with EOFError in /usr/lib/ubuntu-release- upgrader/check-new-release: EOF read where not expected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1058884/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1058884] Re: do-release-upgrade crashed with EOFError in /usr/lib/ubuntu-release-upgrader/check-new-release: EOF read where not expected
I get 431cb3e648b99dde8665698b58109f9f but it is working now. I'll try re-installing when I get time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058884 Title: do-release-upgrade crashed with EOFError in /usr/lib/ubuntu-release- upgrader/check-new-release: EOF read where not expected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1058884/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
nothing. from the 10.04 syslog, I do see this right after all the scsi attach events: Sep 24 13:54:01 file3 multipathd: sdm: add path (uevent) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.297268] sd 10:0:0:0: rdac: LUN 0 (unowned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.299115] sd 8:0:0:0: rdac: LUN 0 (owned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.300844] sd 9:0:0:0: rdac: LUN 0 (owned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.302519] sd 10:0:0:1: rdac: LUN 1 (owned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.304256] sd 10:0:0:2: rdac: LUN 2 (owned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.306406] sd 10:0:0:3: rdac: LUN 3 (unowned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.308048] sd 8:0:0:1: rdac: LUN 1 (unowned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.309676] sd 9:0:0:1: rdac: LUN 1 (unowned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.311221] sd 9:0:0:2: rdac: LUN 2 (unowned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.313092] sd 8:0:0:2: rdac: LUN 2 (unowned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.314769] sd 9:0:0:3: rdac: LUN 3 (owned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.316383] sd 8:0:0:3: rdac: LUN 3 (owned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.316388] rdac: device handler registered and similar with the first 12.04 boot, except the owned/unowned lines are intermixed with the scsi attaches instead of all at the end, so that's different. as far as active/active, I am seeing 140MB/s writes, so RR is working well enough. I think the MD3000 processor is the bottleneck. it's not renowned for being super fast. I did try adjusting the rr_weight and rr_min_io, but it doens't seems to have changed much. Defaults are working well. I'm not running Jumbo frames yet, so maybe that'll help some. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
nothing. from the 10.04 syslog, I do see this right after all the scsi attach events: Sep 24 13:54:01 file3 multipathd: sdm: add path (uevent) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.297268] sd 10:0:0:0: rdac: LUN 0 (unowned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.299115] sd 8:0:0:0: rdac: LUN 0 (owned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.300844] sd 9:0:0:0: rdac: LUN 0 (owned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.302519] sd 10:0:0:1: rdac: LUN 1 (owned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.304256] sd 10:0:0:2: rdac: LUN 2 (owned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.306406] sd 10:0:0:3: rdac: LUN 3 (unowned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.308048] sd 8:0:0:1: rdac: LUN 1 (unowned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.309676] sd 9:0:0:1: rdac: LUN 1 (unowned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.311221] sd 9:0:0:2: rdac: LUN 2 (unowned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.313092] sd 8:0:0:2: rdac: LUN 2 (unowned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.314769] sd 9:0:0:3: rdac: LUN 3 (owned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.316383] sd 8:0:0:3: rdac: LUN 3 (owned) Sep 24 13:54:02 file3 kernel: [7.316388] rdac: device handler registered and similar with the first 12.04 boot, except the owned/unowned lines are intermixed with the scsi attaches instead of all at the end, so that's different. as far as active/active, I am seeing 140MB/s writes, so RR is working well enough. I think the MD3000 processor is the bottleneck. it's not renowned for being super fast. I did try adjusting the rr_weight and rr_min_io, but it doens't seems to have changed much. Defaults are working well. I'm not running Jumbo frames yet, so maybe that'll help some. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1057054] [NEW] poor performance after upgrade to Precise
Public bug reported: I had a Lucid x64 server working with a Dell MD3000i with 4 paths and worked as expected. I added the prio rdac line to the conf file, then upgraded to Precise, and removed the old mpath_rdac line and reboot one more time, just to be sure. I did this based on a section in https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/serverguide.pdf as a sanity check test, I'm doing 'pv /dev/mapper/dellsas1 /dev/null' (friendly names enabled). On Lucid i'd get about 100MB/s After upgrading to Precise I get an almost solid 768kB/s. If I instead use the 4 underlying /dev/sd* devices, 2 give errors as expected, and 2 run at about 100MB/s as expected so iscsi seems to be working correctly and multipath not. ** Affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
** Attachment added: my conf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+attachment/3346034/+files/multipath.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
I have also tried a clean install of precise and I see the same results. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
via lsmod? scsi_dh_rdac is loaded. Does it need to be in the initramfs even if I'm not booting off it? doing so does fix the performance, but it is also counter-intuitive. Shouldn't the multipath driver read the conf file and load the needed modules before finding anything? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
My devices are on iscsi, and I'm not booting off them. They are not connected until after the root goes live and network comes active, via normal means. I never manually loaded scsi_dh_rdac before, it's not in my initrd nor my modules files. It loaded automatically somehow. Why isn't it loading automatically earlier? What loaded it if multipath driver didn't? other drivers load child drivers, why can't multipath? I never found that html server guide in my searching and it is helpful. The PDF I only found after failing a couple times. Other software presents prompts and links when config formats change, or even changes them for you, it's become expected, multipath should do it too. The local manpage for multipath.conf still has prio_callout and not prio documented, and has zero mention of having to manually load drivers. Whether this a bug in how the drivers get loaded, or how the documentation is presented, or how upgrade transition is handled isn't that relevant, it's still a bug. It's Lucid to Precise upgrade regression bug. it's not smooth and it's not even easy to find why it's failing. If the upgrade had presented me with a screen saying the config and driver loading formats have changed, and that html link, I'd have figured it out and we wouldn't be here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
But it survive a reboot. several in fact. I always reboot after major config changes to reduce the chance of a 2am phone call after a power outage. I don't lightly file bugs, it's 3 days and 4 OS re-installs to get me here. This was working on Lucid, and required additional setup for Precise and I found documentation difficult to find. It's repeatable, I've been repeating it all week, both on upgrades and clean installs. Did lucid also use scsi_dh_rdac? I had no issues there. Something changed. I wish i could help find out what. Is there a debug flag and/or log file I can send? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
after the upgrade and initial reboot, I change the config file and verified multipath -ll was as I expected, then rebooted and did the pv test. I did nothing else between my first posting and the reply verifying lsmod, so yes, it was loaded on reboot. I have both controllers in the md3000i, and each has 2 ports. a LUN can be on either controller, and active/active on that one controller, with the other controller as standby. I also have luns on it used by esxi, and the RR paths appear to be the same. I did not check which driver got loaded on lucid, and the dell docs are really kinda all over the place so I was trying to ignore them. rdac did seem to be what was happening based on how multipath -ll showed things, and I did see roughly equal traffic on 2 nics. In my first attempt with Precise I did initially see the ping-ponging you mention, before I understood how to apply rdac configs. With Lucid I put the rdac config in right from the start and did not see that behavior. is it possible the old mpath_prio_rdac callout was loading the driver early in the process? I was not aware of scsi_dh_rdac's existence until this thread, so I have no explanation of how it's getting loaded when you think it shouldn't be. it's nice to see the config codified, I'll have to experiment with that some. thanks for that info. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1057054] [NEW] poor performance after upgrade to Precise
Public bug reported: I had a Lucid x64 server working with a Dell MD3000i with 4 paths and worked as expected. I added the prio rdac line to the conf file, then upgraded to Precise, and removed the old mpath_rdac line and reboot one more time, just to be sure. I did this based on a section in https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/serverguide.pdf as a sanity check test, I'm doing 'pv /dev/mapper/dellsas1 /dev/null' (friendly names enabled). On Lucid i'd get about 100MB/s After upgrading to Precise I get an almost solid 768kB/s. If I instead use the 4 underlying /dev/sd* devices, 2 give errors as expected, and 2 run at about 100MB/s as expected so iscsi seems to be working correctly and multipath not. ** Affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
** Attachment added: my conf file https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+attachment/3346034/+files/multipath.conf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
I have also tried a clean install of precise and I see the same results. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
via lsmod? scsi_dh_rdac is loaded. Does it need to be in the initramfs even if I'm not booting off it? doing so does fix the performance, but it is also counter-intuitive. Shouldn't the multipath driver read the conf file and load the needed modules before finding anything? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
My devices are on iscsi, and I'm not booting off them. They are not connected until after the root goes live and network comes active, via normal means. I never manually loaded scsi_dh_rdac before, it's not in my initrd nor my modules files. It loaded automatically somehow. Why isn't it loading automatically earlier? What loaded it if multipath driver didn't? other drivers load child drivers, why can't multipath? I never found that html server guide in my searching and it is helpful. The PDF I only found after failing a couple times. Other software presents prompts and links when config formats change, or even changes them for you, it's become expected, multipath should do it too. The local manpage for multipath.conf still has prio_callout and not prio documented, and has zero mention of having to manually load drivers. Whether this a bug in how the drivers get loaded, or how the documentation is presented, or how upgrade transition is handled isn't that relevant, it's still a bug. It's Lucid to Precise upgrade regression bug. it's not smooth and it's not even easy to find why it's failing. If the upgrade had presented me with a screen saying the config and driver loading formats have changed, and that html link, I'd have figured it out and we wouldn't be here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
But it survive a reboot. several in fact. I always reboot after major config changes to reduce the chance of a 2am phone call after a power outage. I don't lightly file bugs, it's 3 days and 4 OS re-installs to get me here. This was working on Lucid, and required additional setup for Precise and I found documentation difficult to find. It's repeatable, I've been repeating it all week, both on upgrades and clean installs. Did lucid also use scsi_dh_rdac? I had no issues there. Something changed. I wish i could help find out what. Is there a debug flag and/or log file I can send? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1057054] Re: poor performance after upgrade to Precise
after the upgrade and initial reboot, I change the config file and verified multipath -ll was as I expected, then rebooted and did the pv test. I did nothing else between my first posting and the reply verifying lsmod, so yes, it was loaded on reboot. I have both controllers in the md3000i, and each has 2 ports. a LUN can be on either controller, and active/active on that one controller, with the other controller as standby. I also have luns on it used by esxi, and the RR paths appear to be the same. I did not check which driver got loaded on lucid, and the dell docs are really kinda all over the place so I was trying to ignore them. rdac did seem to be what was happening based on how multipath -ll showed things, and I did see roughly equal traffic on 2 nics. In my first attempt with Precise I did initially see the ping-ponging you mention, before I understood how to apply rdac configs. With Lucid I put the rdac config in right from the start and did not see that behavior. is it possible the old mpath_prio_rdac callout was loading the driver early in the process? I was not aware of scsi_dh_rdac's existence until this thread, so I have no explanation of how it's getting loaded when you think it shouldn't be. it's nice to see the config codified, I'll have to experiment with that some. thanks for that info. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1057054 Title: poor performance after upgrade to Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1057054/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1053173] Re: minidlna crashes on boot when no active network connection
that certainly helps, but it's only partially a fix. local only operation offline is not possible. yes, one could just directly connect to the media files, but then you's have 2 databases to handle instead of just one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053173 Title: minidlna crashes on boot when no active network connection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/minidlna/+bug/1053173/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1053173] [NEW] minidlna crashes on boot when no active network connection
Public bug reported: I've used update-rc.d to make sure it is set to start on boot, but upon booting it is never started. There is never any error in the syslog or the minidlna log. twice now it has also halted the boot process. I did not record the exact text, but it clearly is complaining that there is no network. It seems to only complain on stderr and not in the log file.My network normally does not come up until just after the login screen shows, when I see the network manager balloon telling about it. in the conf file I have log_level=debug and network_interface= is commented out. in /etc/default/minidlna I have START_DAEMON=yes, and OPTS is empty, as default, and I've set the user to the one that owns the media files. after booted and logged in, service minidlna start always works. minidlna version 1.024+dfsg-1 on 12.10 beta. I have not run it on older releases. ** Affects: minidlna (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1053173 Title: minidlna crashes on boot when no active network connection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/minidlna/+bug/1053173/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1035628] Re: [SRU Regression] Alt+Tab/Alt+grave brings other window to the front but loses focus entirely.
I did not see this bug in 12.04, but I do see it in Quantal. if I hold alt-tab long enough to see the switcher, it does not happen, but happens every time I do it quickly. My guess is that switcher is launching as I release the keys, it then shows up enough to take focus and realize the keys are released and goes away leaving focus in limbo. I have not had gnome3 PPA's on either installation. My 12.04 was in place upgrade from each version since 10.04, but my Quantal is a clean install but keeping the /home. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035628 Title: [SRU Regression] Alt+Tab/Alt+grave brings other window to the front but loses focus entirely. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1035628/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 928401] Re: Cannot boot Oneric installation disk on eBox 3300
it is not possible to collect that information, I did boot with quiet and splash off and the kernel immediately stops with the error, similar to when attempting to boot a x64 kernel on a cpu that does not support x64. The hardware as been deployed with an older ubuntu release, so I cannot test latest. Does the kernel team say a change was made in cpu requirements? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928401 Title: Cannot boot Oneric installation disk on eBox 3300 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/928401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 928401] [NEW] Cannot boot Oneric installation disk on eBox 3300
Public bug reported: Cannot boot Oneric i386 Alternate installation disk on eBox 3300, processor is VortexDx86. Kernel complains that the CPU is an i486 but i586 is required. DMP, the manufacturer, claims it to be 586-class, and the wikipedia page for Vortex86 also claims so. Lucid does boot and run on this device, but does not have the network driver included in the pre-compiled kernels, see bug 650899. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928401 Title: Cannot boot Oneric installation disk on eBox 3300 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/928401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 928401] Re: Cannot boot Oneric installation disk on eBox 3300
** Package changed: ubuntu = linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928401 Title: Cannot boot Oneric installation disk on eBox 3300 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/928401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 928401] Re: Cannot boot Oneric installation disk on eBox 3300
the kernel will not boot Oneric. Would it help to run the command on an older release? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928401 Title: Cannot boot Oneric installation disk on eBox 3300 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/928401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 928401] Re: Cannot boot Oneric installation disk on eBox 3300
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928401 Title: Cannot boot Oneric installation disk on eBox 3300 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/928401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922262] [NEW] X -configure fails, leaves valid conf anyway
Public bug reported: hardware: HP Evo SFF desktop, P4, no onboard graphics nVidia Vanta LT graphics card, single VGA port, single monitor attached running: X -configure fails with: X.Org X Server 1.7.6 Release Date: 2010-03-17 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.24-29-server i686 Ubuntu Current Operating System: Linux ltsp564 2.6.32-38-generic #83-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 4 11:13:04 UTC 2012 i686 Kernel command line: ro initrd=ltsp/i386/initrd.img quiet nbdroot=10.212.1.38:2000 BOOT_IMAGE=ltsp/i386/vmlinuz Build Date: 20 October 2011 03:05:54PM xorg-server 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7.10 (For technical support please see http://www.ubuntu.com/support) Current version of pixman: 0.16.4 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.1.log, Time: Thu Jan 26 08:20:07 2012 List of video drivers: apm ark ati chips cirrus voodoo geode i128 i740 intel mach64 mga neomagic nouveau nv openchrome r128 radeon rendition s3 s3virge savage siliconmotion sis sisusb tdfx trident tseng v4l ztv vmware fbdev vesa (++) Using config file: /root/xorg.conf.new (==) Using config directory: /usr/lib/X11/xorg.conf.d (EE) [drm] No DRICreatePCIBusID symbol Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices. Configuration failed. ddxSigGiveUp: Closing log this leaves a proper /root/xorg.conf.new, but tools such as ltsp client's configure-x.sh script fails to parse this out and will not work correctly. proposed solution: change this error to a warning since a proper working config is generated anyway. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922262 Title: X -configure fails, leaves valid conf anyway To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/922262/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 894809] [NEW] side bar gone, can't edit existing bookmarks
Public bug reported: After upgrading my install from 11.04 to 11.10, the sidebar in vinagre is missing, and there's no option in the View menu to enable it. There is also no method for editing bookmarks as this was done via the sidebar. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: vinagre 3.2.1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-13.22-generic 3.0.6 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-13-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Nov 25 09:43:44 2011 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/vinagre InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: vinagre UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: vinagre (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug apport-lpi oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894809 Title: side bar gone, can't edit existing bookmarks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vinagre/+bug/894809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 894809] Re: side bar gone, can't edit existing bookmarks
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894809 Title: side bar gone, can't edit existing bookmarks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vinagre/+bug/894809/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 398923] Re: Disable Connect to localhost in Vinagre
disabling localhost would also disable ssh tunnels, which would make vinagre completely useless for those that admin remote systems. This could be overriden with the use host option, as long as it remains fixed (it has been broken in the last 2 releases). if it's possible to detect when the remote connect is to itself, this would fix the problem properly, but that would be have to be part of the vnc protocol itself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398923 Title: Disable Connect to localhost in Vinagre To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/398923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 879470] [NEW] unexplained high latency
Public bug reported: I'm experiencing some occasional high latency that's causing some irc clients to timeout. xchat is showing 5-10 second lag. Server isn't swapping, iostat shows 10 %util, await has occasional single spikes to 20, low cpu usage, network utilization also low. all clients are on 100mbit or better LAN connections. I'm not really sure how to diagnose this, best I can tell it's either because a client connecting or disconnecting and ngircd is blocking on something. I also notice the packaged version for 10.04LTS is 3 years old, and even 11.10's is 2 years old and I have to wonder if some of the code cleanup and better error handling notes in the change logs over the past 2 years would reduce this latency I'm seeing. Is there a reason for the old version? ** Affects: ngircd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879470 Title: unexplained high latency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ngircd/+bug/879470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665432] [NEW] python-webkit fails on websockets
Public bug reported: upstream pywebkitGTK claims to support websockets if compiled with --enable-web-sockets. lucid package appears to not have that flag enabled, reducing functionality of the library. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: python-webkit 1.1.7-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-25.45-generic 2.6.32.21+drm33.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Oct 22 22:19:18 2010 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: pywebkitgtk ** Affects: pywebkitgtk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- python-webkit fails on websockets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665432] Re: python-webkit fails on websockets
-- python-webkit fails on websockets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524450] Re: smbd panic using root postexec
now I've just getting this The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action, was called for PID 25021 (). This means there was a problem with the program, such as a segfault. However, the executable could not be found for process 25021. It may have died unexpectedly, or you may not have permission to debug the process. panic action should run as root right? log has this [2010/05/04 08:56:44, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) === [2010/05/04 08:56:44, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 25021 (3.3.2) Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of the Samba3-HOWTO [2010/05/04 08:56:44, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) From: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf [2010/05/04 08:56:44, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(44) === [2010/05/04 08:56:44, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1673) PANIC (pid 25021): internal error [2010/05/04 08:56:44, 0] lib/util.c:log_stack_trace(1777) BACKTRACE: 11 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(log_stack_trace+0x2d) [0xb7cb939c] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x80) [0xb7cb94f9] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd [0xb7ca4e9e] #3 [0xb7aec400] #4 /usr/sbin/smbd(copy_serverinfo+0x6a) [0xb7cfd984] #5 /usr/sbin/smbd(change_to_user+0x3e5) [0xb7b98b95] #6 /usr/sbin/smbd [0xb7bb4b78] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd(smbd_process+0xf58) [0xb7bb6dcc] #8 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x1126) [0xb7b7e32f] #9 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5) [0xb7691775] #10 /usr/sbin/smbd [0xb7b7b0a1] [2010/05/04 08:56:44, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1678) smb_panic(): calling panic action [/usr/share/samba/panic-action 25021] [2010/05/04 08:56:45, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1686) smb_panic(): action returned status 0 [2010/05/04 08:56:45, 0] lib/fault.c:dump_core(231) dumping core in /var/log/samba/cores/smbd I'm hesitant to attach a core publicly since this is a production system and it looks like it contains some private data like usernames and groups and my full smb.conf. can I extract anything useful from it? -- smbd panic using root postexec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270781] Re: unix_chkpwd crashes on gnome-screensaver
I am having this issue on a lucid x64 install upgraded from a properly working karmic. I have another lucid x64 clean install that does not have the issue. the only information I have is this in my auth.log. can I enable some extended login somehow? Apr 18 16:27:29 cw gnome-screensaver-dialog: pam_unix(gnome-screensaver:auth): unix_chkpwd abnormal exit: 11 Apr 18 16:27:31 cw gnome-screensaver-dialog: pam_unix(gnome-screensaver:auth): unix_chkpwd abnormal exit: 11 Apr 18 16:27:31 cw gnome-screensaver-dialog: pam_unix(gnome-screensaver:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=1000 euid=1000 tty=:0.0 ruser= rhost= user=chrisw there's 2 because i tried 2 times to make sure I didn't typo, then switched to console and logged in to kill gnome-screensaver. This also isn't failing intermittently, it fails every time, even when manually locking the screen. -- unix_chkpwd crashes on gnome-screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524450] Re: smbd panic using root postexec
You'll need some cd iso's in a directory, then see my samba.conf for how i create the shares. the share names should match the iso file name but add a iso- prefix. the mount and unmount scripts will handle creating the share directories and loop mounting and unmounting the iso files to it I've not tried it on a different 9.04 or 9.10 yet though and I suspect i may have a different problem. I decided to go production with this server anyway, and I have an old application that runs on NT4 IIS that uses an IIS virtual directory to a UNC path that is just a normal samba share, no pre/post-exec's, on this server and it too is panicing smbd in exactly the same way. No other shares or clients are causing panics. the behavior is a little different, the share still works initially but seems to call the panic action quite often, possibly when IIS decides the share is idle and disconnects it, and it will usually reconnect on the next access, but so far once a day it will not reconnect requiring a restart of the IIS admin service. This setup has been working perfectly (as far as I know) for many years, starting with samba 2.4.x on Debian Sarge and with various Ubuntu and samba versions since. The common factor it seem is when windows disconnects from a share without a full system logoff or shutdown. Is there a way to increase logging for just a single share to get more data? I have 50 clients PC's on this now so a system wide log level increase will make a hell of a lot of noise. -- smbd panic using root postexec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 524450] Re: smbd panic using root postexec
You'll need some cd iso's in a directory, then see my samba.conf for how i create the shares. the share names should match the iso file name but add a iso- prefix. the mount and unmount scripts will handle creating the share directories and loop mounting and unmounting the iso files to it I've not tried it on a different 9.04 or 9.10 yet though and I suspect i may have a different problem. I decided to go production with this server anyway, and I have an old application that runs on NT4 IIS that uses an IIS virtual directory to a UNC path that is just a normal samba share, no pre/post-exec's, on this server and it too is panicing smbd in exactly the same way. No other shares or clients are causing panics. the behavior is a little different, the share still works initially but seems to call the panic action quite often, possibly when IIS decides the share is idle and disconnects it, and it will usually reconnect on the next access, but so far once a day it will not reconnect requiring a restart of the IIS admin service. This setup has been working perfectly (as far as I know) for many years, starting with samba 2.4.x on Debian Sarge and with various Ubuntu and samba versions since. The common factor it seem is when windows disconnects from a share without a full system logoff or shutdown. Is there a way to increase logging for just a single share to get more data? I have 50 clients PC's on this now so a system wide log level increase will make a hell of a lot of noise. -- smbd panic using root postexec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524450] Re: smbd panic using root postexec
** Attachment added: conf files and mount script http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39918618/samba.zip -- smbd panic using root postexec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 524450] Re: smbd panic using root postexec
** Attachment added: conf files and mount script http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39918618/samba.zip -- smbd panic using root postexec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524450] Re: smbd panic using root postexec
libwbclient0 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.3 samba install ok installed samba 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.3 install ok installed samba-common 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.3 samba install ok installed smbclient 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.3 samba install ok installed winbind 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.3 samba install ok installed windows client, no errors on client. I get an email from the panic action script and the ISO is not unmounted same exact same conf file works on 8.04 with: samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.10 install ok installed samba-common 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.10 samba install ok installed samba-doc 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.10 samba install ok installed smbclient 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.10 samba install ok installed smbfs 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.10 samba install ok installed swat 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.10 samba install ok installed webmin-samba 1.180-3 webmin-optional deinstall ok config-files winbind 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.10 samba install ok installed the only log file with any messages at all is already posted. -- smbd panic using root postexec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524450] [NEW] smbd panic using root postexec
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Using ubuntu 9.04, samba 3.3.2, package version 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.3 I have some shares for which I use a root preexec and root postexec to loop mount and unmount an ISO for so I can share some CDrom instead of carrying them all over the place or extracting them (I also mount them from VMWare so i want to keep them as ISO's) and this setup has been working great on 8.04 with samba 3.0.28a. on 9.04, the preexec works, but on disconnecting from the share the postexec doesn't seem to fire (or at least the loop mounted ISO doesn't get unmounted) and smbd panics. Running my postexec script manually does work. I've attached the log that shows the panic. in the log you can me trying 2 shares, both are defined the same way, but the 2nd has a force user=root in an attempt to see if it's an odd permissions issue. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- smbd panic using root postexec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 524450] Re: smbd panic using root postexec
** Attachment added: log.chrisww.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39404792/log.chrisww.gz -- smbd panic using root postexec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 524450] [NEW] smbd panic using root postexec
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Using ubuntu 9.04, samba 3.3.2, package version 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.3 I have some shares for which I use a root preexec and root postexec to loop mount and unmount an ISO for so I can share some CDrom instead of carrying them all over the place or extracting them (I also mount them from VMWare so i want to keep them as ISO's) and this setup has been working great on 8.04 with samba 3.0.28a. on 9.04, the preexec works, but on disconnecting from the share the postexec doesn't seem to fire (or at least the loop mounted ISO doesn't get unmounted) and smbd panics. Running my postexec script manually does work. I've attached the log that shows the panic. in the log you can me trying 2 shares, both are defined the same way, but the 2nd has a force user=root in an attempt to see if it's an odd permissions issue. ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- smbd panic using root postexec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 524450] Re: smbd panic using root postexec
** Attachment added: log.chrisww.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39404792/log.chrisww.gz -- smbd panic using root postexec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445953] Re: shutdown asks for password with only 1 user logged in
just a status update: I've gotten this once more, and it was a cron job but I don't know which one, by the time I dug that far into it, it was done. I've since reinstalled clean to a new HDD, hopefully it won't come back. -- shutdown asks for password with only 1 user logged in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 384591] Re: Reiser4 is not included into the Linux Kernel
I'm finding it surprising of the lack of interest in reiser4 since it's the only linux filesystem that supports transparent compression, and has for 2+ years. -- Reiser4 is not included into the Linux Kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445953] Re: shutdown asks for password with only 1 user logged in
before you guys get all crazy changing packages on this report, I'm fairly certain I don't have mythTV installed. In my case, I suspect a SMB session from the wife's laptop, but since this a desktop role system I don't see why I have to put in a password for this. prompt on x11-display != '' I can see, but otherwise why care. -- shutdown asks for password with only 1 user logged in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 445953] Re: shutdown asks for password with only 1 user logged in
James, this *is* my bug report. however, the email generated from your post has** Package changed: consolekit (Ubuntu) = mythtv (Ubuntu) at the end making me think the package was being changed, but that doens't seem to be reflected on the web site so i guess it's not a problem -- shutdown asks for password with only 1 user logged in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
