[Bug 1713650] Re: Can't Alt+drag windows at all any more
Gnome now differs from every single other window manager. I understand that alt+drag interferes with some former mac users' workflows, but really, we've been here for 20 years and they just arrived... why should we change our workflows to suit theirs? Can we please revert to the default, and make this a tick-box option upon installation, or in keyboard settings? (Ie. "Do you use . names of applications " or even better, put the option in those applications. Can anyone link to where Gnome made this decision? TLDR: it's super frustrating that Gnome now has a different default shortcut key from every single other window manager. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713650 Title: Can't Alt+drag windows at all any more To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1713650/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1734095] Re: Software & Updates not showing authorization popup [gnome-shell[N]: pushModal: invocation of begin_modal failed]
Aaand... here I am on 20.04 with the same issue. What does software- properties-gtk use to prompt for root access - and why doesn't it work? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734095 Title: Software & Updates not showing authorization popup [gnome-shell[N]: pushModal: invocation of begin_modal failed] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell-legacy-bugs/+bug/1734095/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1799988] Re: Missing wifi and bluetooth after sleep on XPS 9370
Might I add - looking at the logs above it seems people with both iwl and ath10k are affected - which probably points to something upstream in the bus. With regards to it being on the USB bus, wireless devices only show under lspci, not lsusb. The the errors in the log with regards to ath10k and the unknown usb device, are probably not related. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799988 Title: Missing wifi and bluetooth after sleep on XPS 9370 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/1799988/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1799988] Re: Missing wifi and bluetooth after sleep on XPS 9370
Not sure if this might help... looks like this Dell has some hardware design problems - we should be able to come up with a workaround nonetheless. I've had the stock Ubuntu kernels die on me several times - goes into what seems to be disk thrashing (on an SSD?!) and 50% of the time the OOM killer recued it - but only after 30-60 minutes, nobody can wait that long - with nothing in the logs to go on, so I compiled my own kernel to dig deeper. Which brings me here - Wifi + Bluetooth missing, but only after several suspend / resume cycles -on my own kernel. This has only happened once over the course of 6 months with the Ubuntu 18.04.2 stock kernel. Correct me here, but it seems the Wi-Fi + Bluetooth is connected to the USB3 bus? My next step will be to load the USB3 driver as a module so I can unload and reload it to see if that resets it properly. ** Attachment added: "dmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1799988/+attachment/5284639/+files/dmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799988 Title: Missing wifi and bluetooth after sleep on XPS 9370 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell-sputnik/+bug/1799988/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1814551] Re: Ubuntu 18.10's ibus package breaks password fields in Firefox Beta (65, 66 via PPA)
This is still not resolved, from further upstream, for users running gnome-shell. The only workaround for Firefox is still: coenraad@coenraad-dell:~$ GTK_IM_MODULE=xim firefox& [1] 28696 coenraad@coenraad-dell:~$ apt list --installed gnome-shell xorg ibus Listing... Done gnome-shell/bionic-updates,now 3.28.4-0ubuntu18.04.1 amd64 [installed] ibus/bionic,now 1.5.17-3ubuntu4 amd64 [installed] xorg/bionic-updates,now 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1 amd64 [installed] coenraad@coenraad-dell:~$ cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS \n \l coenraad@coenraad-dell:~$ ps auxf|grep X gdm 2821 0.0 0.5 909436 47064 tty1 Sl+ 07:55 0:00 | | \_ /usr/bin/Xwayland :1024 -rootless -terminate -accessx -core -listen 4 -listen 5 -displayfd 6 coenraad 26434 9.4 0.9 531272 71724 tty2 Sl+ 08:18 0:13 \_ /usr/lib/xorg/Xorg vt2 -displayfd 3 -auth /run/user/1000/gdm/Xauthority -background none -noreset -keeptty -verbose 3 coenraad@coenraad-dell:~$ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814551 Title: Ubuntu 18.10's ibus package breaks password fields in Firefox Beta (65, 66 via PPA) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/+bug/1814551/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1720580] Re: RTL8723bs bug: ERROR sd_recv_rxfifo: alloc recvbuf FAIL!
sudo rmmod r8723bs sudo modprobe r8723bs sudo iwlist wlan0 scanning Gets you reconnnected for another few minutes or hours... I am looking into the cause. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1720580 Title: RTL8723bs bug: ERROR sd_recv_rxfifo: alloc recvbuf FAIL! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1720580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1299836] Re: Alt+mouse move doesn't drag window any more
The Gnome project have changed some default key combinations that have existed for 30+ years. I don't think this is acceptable. For reference, the new key combination is Super+drag. Alt+Tab has been changed to Alt+~. And the list goes on. I think Ubuntu will do well to maintain the age old defaults. 100 000 users each having to spend an hour trying to figure out why their keys don't work, and having to dig into config files to fix it, is 100 000 man hours wasted doing something really menial. ** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299836 Title: Alt+mouse move doesn't drag window any more To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1299836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1575408] Re: pkgAcquire::Run warnings ("Can't drop privileges for downloading...") during font-file downloads
Still present in latest image of Ubuntu 16.04 x64 Desktop install
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575408
Title:
pkgAcquire::Run warnings ("Can't drop privileges for downloading...")
during font-file downloads
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/1575408/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1578603] [NEW] Installer fails when installing offline
Public bug reported: 16.04 LTS Server installer fails when installing offline with a defaulted BIOS clock I presume that this wouldn't happen with a correct clock - in that case the installer should refuse to even try installing offline. Just reporting this so you know. IMO installer should always work as it will ultimately make obtaining a good clock setting possible. Relevant part of log file below Jan 1 00:10:19 kernel: [ 477.894569] Adding 1006588k swap on /dev/sda5. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:1006588k FS Jan 1 00:10:20 kernel: [ 478.016135] EXT4-fs (sda1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: errors=remount-ro Jan 1 00:10:20 apt-install: Queueing package e2fsprogs for later installation Jan 1 00:10:20 main-menu[257]: (process:20993): mount: mounting /dev/sda1 on /target/ failed: Invalid argument Jan 1 00:10:20 main-menu[257]: INFO: Restoring default debconf priority 'high' Jan 1 00:10:20 debconf: Setting debconf/priority to high Jan 1 00:10:21 main-menu[257]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for brltty-udeb Jan 1 00:10:21 main-menu[257]: INFO: Falling back to the package description for brltty-udeb Jan 1 00:10:21 main-menu[257]: INFO: Menu item 'live-installer' selected Jan 1 00:10:21 base-installer: info: Using squashfs support for /cdrom/install/filesystem.squashfs Jan 1 00:10:21 anna-install: Installing squashfs-modules Jan 1 00:10:21 anna[23293]: DEBUG: resolver (kernel-image-4.4.0-21-generic-di): package doesn't exist (ignored) Jan 1 00:10:21 anna[23293]: DEBUG: retrieving squashfs-modules-4.4.0-21-generic-di 4.4.0-21.37 Jan 1 00:10:21 kernel: [ 479.868486] squashfs: version 4.0 (2009/01/31) Phillip Lougher Jan 1 00:10:51 live-installer: WARNING: no live-config script matching /target/lib/live/config/*-ssl-cert ! Jan 1 00:10:52 apt-install: Queueing package keyboard-configuration for later installation Jan 1 00:10:52 apt-install: Queueing package console-setup for later installation Jan 1 00:10:52 netcfg[23598]: INFO: Starting netcfg v.1.135ubuntu4 Jan 1 00:10:52 netcfg[23598]: DEBUG: No interface given; clearing /etc/network/interfaces Jan 1 00:10:52 netcfg[23598]: DEBUG: Writing informative header Jan 1 00:10:52 netcfg[23598]: DEBUG: Success! Jan 1 00:10:52 netcfg[23598]: DEBUG: Writing loopback interface Jan 1 00:10:52 netcfg[23598]: DEBUG: Success! Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Using CD-ROM mount point /media/cdrom/ Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Identifying... Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: [d409ae1eb0898c504d613b1e040b881b-2] Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Scanning disc for index files... Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Found 2 package indexes, 0 source indexes, 0 translation indexes and 1 signatures Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Found label 'Ubuntu-Server 16.04 LTS _Xenial Xerus_ - Release amd64 (20160420.3)' Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: This disc is called: Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: 'Ubuntu-Server 16.04 LTS _Xenial Xerus_ - Release amd64 (20160420.3)' Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Copying package lists... Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: gpgv: Signature made Wed Apr 20 22:44:19 2016 UTC using DSA key ID FBB75451 Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: gpgv: Good signature from "Ubuntu CD Image Automatic Signing Key " Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: ^MReading Package Indexes... 0%^M Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: ^MReading Package Indexes... Done^M Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Writing new source list Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Source list entries for this disc are: Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: deb cdrom:[Ubuntu-Server 16.04 LTS _Xenial Xerus_ - Release amd64 (20160420.3)]/ xenial main restricted Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Repeat this process for the rest of the CDs in your set. Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Ign:1 cdrom://Ubuntu-Server 16.04 LTS _Xenial Xerus_ - Release amd64 (20160420.3) xenial InRelease Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Hit:2 cdrom://Ubuntu-Server 16.04 LTS _Xenial Xerus_ - Release amd64 (20160420.3) xenial Release Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Reading package lists... Jan 1 00:10:52 base-installer: Jan 1 00:10:53 in-target: Reading package lists... Jan 1 00:10:53 in-target: Jan 1 00:10:53 in-target: Building dependency tree... Jan 1 00:10:53 in-target: Jan 1 00:10:53 in-target: locales is already the newest version (2.23-0ubuntu3). Jan 1 00:10:53 in-target: 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Jan 1 00:10:53 localechooser: Generating locales (this might take a while)... Jan 1 00:10:53 localechooser: en_US Jan 1 00:10:53 localechooser: .UTF-8 Jan 1 00:10:53 localechooser: ... Jan 1 00:10:54 localechooser: done Jan 1 00:10:54 localechooser: Generation complete. Jan 1 00:10:55 localechooser: Generating locales (this might take a while)... Jan 1 00:10:55 localechooser: en_US Jan 1 00:10:55 localechooser: .UTF-8 Jan 1 00:10:55 localechooser: ... Jan 1 00:10:56 localechooser: done Jan 1 00:10:56 localechooser: Gen
[Bug 662606] Re: Nautilus crashes when goes to directory with JP2 files
This bug is still present in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS nautilus Architecture: amd64 Version: 1:3.10.1-0ubuntu8 In my case this is a security certificate, but Nautilus tries to extract a thumbnail as if it's an image file - and crashes. I have tried this with random data, and by truncating the file, but it only crashes on the whole file. Obviously I can't share the file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662606 Title: Nautilus crashes when goes to directory with JP2 files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/662606/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 970234] Re: Selecting spice and qxl mode results in blank screen
I'm on 12.04.4 and a simple apt-get install qemu-kvm-spice gave me the qemu-system-x86_64-spice which worked fine. I also got a black screen after installing the guest tools, and the QNX driver, upon first boot in QNX mode... but just gave it a few minutes to detect and install the driver - it's very slow before that gets enabled. Links here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/202067/libvirt-with-spice- on-12-04-amd64/511043#511043 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970234 Title: Selecting spice and qxl mode results in blank screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm-spice/+bug/970234/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 293154] Re: vlc does not run as root
It would be a bug if "ls" or "bash" reported the same message! -- vlc does not run as root https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316300] Re: PPPOE not available over Wireless - Greyed out
This is with latest updated Ubuntu 8.10 as of Jan 12, 2009 -- PPPOE not available over Wireless - Greyed out https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316300] [NEW] PPPOE not available over Wireless - Greyed out
Public bug reported: NetworkManager / nm-applet: This appears to be a simple design fault in that PPPoE is only available over "Wired" networks, and the defined PPPOE networks are greyed out when connected via "Wireless" and not "Wired" connections are available. People in the wireless industry make extensive use of PPPoE connections via Wireless and there is no sensible reason to not enable connecting PPPoE connections when connected exclusively via "Wireless". ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- PPPOE not available over Wireless - Greyed out https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252018] Re: Windows can be resized beyond viewable area
The report description is misleading; This is technically a bug, as the default behavior is not adhered to, as in that the panels may be obscured. (Should post a feature request to request a setting to allow this... ;) 1) Can you obscure the panels at any time? 2) Have you checked to see if there is a setting which may allow or disallow this behavior? 3) Can you confirm that this issue is still present in 8.10? -- Windows can be resized beyond viewable area https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252018 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252018] Re: Windows can be resized beyond viewable area
Bug report unclear, please elaborate, possibly with screenshots. Is it a bug that will hinder your nomal use of Ubuntu? Are the actual panels off-screen? Is it going to affect a large number of people? ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- Windows can be resized beyond viewable area https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252018 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252018] Re: Windows can be resized beyond viewable area
Definitely a feature. Nothing annoys me more than not being able to resize a window beyond a certain margin. Imagine you have to view a control on a fixed size window, located at 700,700, but your desktop resolution is only 640x480. What now? Remember, Linux exists to bail you out of these unforeseen situations. You can always manually resize so the window is smaller, additionally you can move the window by holding the alt key. Why put an artificial limit on the size of a window, other than to annoy advanced users? -- Windows can be resized beyond viewable area https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252018 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 278078] Re: The key repeat delay for the "down-arrow", "left-arrow", and "End" keys is longer than the other keys
I'm having the same issue on Intrepid on a Compaq NX6110 Laptop. Clean install of Ubuntu 8.10; Change the keyboard repeat rate under System Preferences. All keys are affected by the new repeat rate, except for the "left arrow" and "down arrow". (Can't really test "end" repeat rate!) I do not recall having the same problem with other distributions or versions of Linux. I will double check and confirm. My suspicion is either a driver problem, or a hardware problem. Lets eliminate the latter by confirming that it can indeed work properly. I am available to do any tests if necessary. -- The key repeat delay for the "down-arrow", "left-arrow", and "End" keys is longer than the other keys https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260341] Re: [945G] wrong LCD resolution detected
Adding Modeline "1440x900" 106.47 1440 1520 1672 1904 900 901 904 932 -HSync +Vsync To the monitor section of /etc/X11/xorg.conf fixed it for me! (This was after finding the binary drivers here: http://ncc- 1701a.homelinux.net/WikiBerd/index.php?page=LinuxSis67x) -- [945G] wrong LCD resolution detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260341] Re: [945G] wrong LCD resolution detected
Thats for my LCD; Turns out the SIS driver doesnt use the GTF timing formula to calculate it's timings. (Theres a "hacked" intel driver which is basically the same SIS driver, apparently) gtf 1440 900 60 gave my modeline, you could try gtf 1280 1024 60 or something similar to find a suitable modeline for your monitor... or maybe even a different timing formula. -- [945G] wrong LCD resolution detected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 215806] Re: network-admin can't setup pppoe connection for wifi
I think it is a simple matter of listing also "ath" and "wlan" interfaces in the drop-down box. ** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- network-admin can't setup pppoe connection for wifi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215806 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120251] Re: "security check failed"
Solution: Add yourself to the voice group in order to make outgoing calls: usermod -a -G voice yourusername -- "security check failed" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222253] [NEW] Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Kernel does not support VIA C3 CPU
Public bug reported: On a clean install of Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Alternative (text), upon first boot, it terminates with the following message: This kernel requires the following features not present on the CPU: 0:6 Please use a kernel that is compatible with your system. I believe that a server edition of Ubuntu should support VIA C3, as it makes an ideal low-power small form-factor server. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : CentaurHauls cpu family : 6 model : 9 model name : VIA Nehemiah stepping: 8 cpu MHz : 997.516 cache size : 64 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr cx8 sep mtrr pge cmov pat mmx fxsr sse up rng rng_en ace ace_en bogomips: 1997.24 clflush size: 32 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Kernel does not support VIA C3 CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/53 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132681] Re: firefox very slow compared to other browsers on large pages
I have similar symptoms on a clean install of Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy. Firefox slows to less than a crawl (it's painful typing this!) I have one page open that uses AJAX and Javascript to update a table. The page is less than 1K. As long as this (or any other javascript- containing window is open) FF Cpu usage jumps to 100% every other second. Soon as I kill firefox my system performance returns to normal. P4 3Ghz, Geforce 6800, Compiz-fusion Gnome desktop. I did install the google toolbar, and have disabled it, same prob. Don't recall it happening before though. I will remove FF and do a neat install and report back. -- firefox very slow compared to other browsers on large pages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132681 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
