[Bug 1870559] Re: Kernel NULL pointer dereference while receiving zfs snapshots
Do you mind running the following command and posting the output to the bug? dpkg -l | grep zfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870559 Title: Kernel NULL pointer dereference while receiving zfs snapshots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1870559/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1873198] Re: package zfs-dkms 0.8.3-1ubuntu12 failed to install/upgrade: installed zfs-dkms package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10
For Ubuntu Focal the dkms package is not required as the driver is supplied in the kernel package. I recommend removing zfs-dkms to avoid this happening in the future. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873198 Title: package zfs-dkms 0.8.3-1ubuntu12 failed to install/upgrade: installed zfs-dkms package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1873198/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1870559] Re: Kernel NULL pointer dereference while receiving zfs snapshots
For reference, the splat was: [ 2465.077373] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: [ 2465.077397] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 2465.077403] #PF: error_code(0x) - not-present page [ 2465.077409] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 2465.077415] Oops: [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 2465.077422] CPU: 0 PID: 23215 Comm: receive_writer Tainted: P O 5.4.0-21-generic #25-Ubuntu [ 2465.077433] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P5LD2-X/1333, BIOS 021412/23/2008 [ 2465.077619] RIP: 0010:abd_verify+0xa/0x40 [zfs] [ 2465.077626] Code: ff 85 c0 74 12 48 c7 03 00 00 00 00 48 c7 43 08 00 00 00 00 5b 5d c3 e8 04 ff ff ff eb e7 c3 90 55 48 89 e5 41 54 53 48 89 fb <8b> 3f e8 0f ff ff ff 85 c0 75 22 44 8b 63 1c 48 8b 7b 20 4d 85 e4 [ 2465.077642] RSP: 0018:b28b51f6f998 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 2465.077649] RAX: 4000 RBX: RCX: [ 2465.077656] RDX: 4000 RSI: 4000 RDI: [ 2465.077662] RBP: b28b51f6f9a8 R08: 03da R09: 0045e54c [ 2465.077669] R10: 36bf R11: R12: 4000 [ 2465.077675] R13: 8ff6af5bd5f0 R14: 4000 R15: [ 2465.077683] FS: () GS:8ff70c60() knlGS: [ 2465.077691] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 [ 2465.077697] CR2: CR3: 58e5 CR4: 06f0 [ 2465.077704] Call Trace: [ 2465.077754] abd_borrow_buf+0x19/0x60 [zfs] [ 2465.077801] abd_borrow_buf_copy+0x1a/0x50 [zfs] [ 2465.077873] zio_crypt_copy_dnode_bonus+0x30/0x130 [zfs] [ 2465.077922] arc_buf_untransform_in_place.isra.0+0x2b/0x40 [zfs] [ 2465.077971] arc_buf_fill+0x1f0/0x4a0 [zfs] [ 2465.078021] arc_untransform+0x22/0x90 [zfs] [ 2465.078070] dbuf_read_verify_dnode_crypt+0xed/0x160 [zfs] [ 2465.078141] ? atomic_cmpxchg+0x16/0x30 [zfs] [ 2465.078191] dbuf_read_impl+0x117/0x610 [zfs] [ 2465.078240] ? atomic64_add_return+0x12/0x30 [zfs] [ 2465.078291] dbuf_read+0xcb/0x5f0 [zfs] [ 2465.078340] ? dbuf_hold_impl+0x2f/0x40 [zfs] [ 2465.078395] dmu_tx_check_ioerr+0x70/0xd0 [zfs] [ 2465.078450] dmu_tx_hold_free_impl+0x12c/0x240 [zfs] [ 2465.078507] dmu_tx_hold_free+0x40/0x50 [zfs] [ 2465.078559] dmu_free_long_range_impl+0x124/0x350 [zfs] [ 2465.078612] dmu_free_long_range+0x74/0xc0 [zfs] [ 2465.078665] dmu_free_long_object+0x27/0xc0 [zfs] [ 2465.078720] receive_freeobjects.isra.0+0x7a/0x100 [zfs] [ 2465.078777] receive_process_record+0x89/0x1c0 [zfs] [ 2465.078833] receive_writer_thread+0x9a/0x150 [zfs] [ 2465.078889] ? receive_process_record+0x1c0/0x1c0 [zfs] [ 2465.078910] thread_generic_wrapper+0x83/0xa0 [spl] [ 2465.078919] kthread+0x104/0x140 [ 2465.078929] ? clear_bit+0x20/0x20 [spl] [ 2465.078934] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 [ 2465.078941] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 [ 2465.078946] Modules linked in: nfnetlink xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_tcpudp ip6table_mangle ip6table_nat iptable_mangle iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ebtable_filter ebtables ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_filter bpfilter essiv authenc dm_crypt zfs(PO) zunicode(PO) zavl(PO) icp(PO) zcommon(PO) znvpair(PO) spl(O) zlua(PO) snd_ctxfi snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore input_leds 8021q garp mrp asus_atk0110 kvm_intel bridge stp llc mac_hid kvm serio_raw sch_fq_codel nfsd nfs_acl lockd grace auth_rpcgss hwmon_vid coretemp sunrpc ip_tables x_tables autofs4 btrfs xor zstd_compress hid_generic usbhid hid raid6_pq libcrc32c nouveau mxm_wmi wmi gpio_ich video i2c_algo_bit ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops r8169 i2c_i801 pata_acpi lpc_ich drm realtek [ 2465.079029] CR2: [ 2465.079035] ---[ end trace 7a059aed43188006 ]--- [ 2465.079084] RIP: 0010:abd_verify+0xa/0x40 [zfs] [ 2465.079090] Code: ff 85 c0 74 12 48 c7 03 00 00 00 00 48 c7 43 08 00 00 00 00 5b 5d c3 e8 04 ff ff ff eb e7 c3 90 55 48 89 e5 41 54 53 48 89 fb <8b> 3f e8 0f ff ff ff 85 c0 75 22 44 8b 63 1c 48 8b 7b 20 4d 85 e4 [ 2465.079104] RSP: 0018:b28b51f6f998 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 2465.079110] RAX: 4000 RBX: RCX: [ 2465.079116] RDX: 4000 RSI: 4000 RDI: [ 2465.079411] RBP: b28b51f6f9a8 R08: 03da R09: 0045e54c [ 2465.079702] R10: 36bf R11: R12: 4000 [ 2465.079993] R13: 8ff6af5bd5f0 R14: 4000 R15: [ 2465.080279] FS: () GS:8ff70c60() knlGS: [ 2465.080571] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 80050033 [ 2465.080883] CR2: CR3: 58e5 CR4: 06f0 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Ia
[Bug 1872945] Re: risc-v doubles getting clobbered somehow
Does this occur on real H/W? Can somebody with risc-v H/W test this out? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872945 Title: risc-v doubles getting clobbered somehow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1872945/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1872945] [NEW] risc-v doubles getting clobbered somehow
Public bug reported:
I've been noticing that doubles get clobbered in stress-ng. I managed to
whittle it down to the following reproducer that can trip the issue on a
risc-v system running the Linux risc-v-qemu 5.4.0-24-generic kernel.
This also occurs on other older kernels too. I've tested this with
gcc-9, gcc-10 and clang-9 too.
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
double timeval_to_double(const struct timeval *tv)
{
return (double)tv->tv_sec + ((double)tv->tv_usec / 100.0);
}
int main(void)
{
struct timeval tv2, tv1;
double t1;
bool fail = false;
gettimeofday(, NULL);
t1 = timeval_to_double();
for (;;) {
double t2;
int tmp;
gettimeofday(, NULL);
t2 = timeval_to_double();
tmp = errno;
if (t2 - t1 < 0.0) {
printf("%f %f %f\n", t1, t2, t2 - t1);
printf("START : %f %ld %ld (%lx %lx) errno=%d\n",
t1,
tv1.tv_sec, tv1.tv_usec,
tv1.tv_sec, tv1.tv_usec,
tmp);
printf("NOW BAD: %f %ld %ld (%lx %lx) errno=%d\n",
t2,
tv2.tv_sec, tv2.tv_usec,
tv2.tv_sec, tv2.tv_usec,
tmp);
fail = true;
} else {
if (fail) {
printf("NOW OK: %f %ld %ld (%lx %lx)
errno=%d\n",
t2,
tv2.tv_sec, tv2.tv_usec,
tv2.tv_sec, tv2.tv_usec,
tmp);
}
fail = false;
}
}
}
Run the code (compiled with -O0, -O1 or even O2) and after some (long)
random-ish time I see:
./a.out
1575050049.059796 0.00 -1575050049.059796
START : 1575050049.059796 1575050049 59796 (5de15b41 e994) errno=0
NOW BAD: 0.00 1575050053 437619 (5de15b45 6ad73) errno=0
NOW OK: 1575050053.460829 1575050053 460829 (5de15b45 7081d) errno=0
So the t2 value is zero which is a bit weird. The integer values for the
tv struct are sane though, so it appears not to be a bad struct value
returned from the kernel.
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: New
** Affects: qemu (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: New
** Also affects: qemu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872945
Title:
risc-v doubles getting clobbered somehow
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1872945/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1872555] Re: the included a-* plugins can not load because of the new version of the GNU C Library
Sponsored. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872555 Title: the included a-* plugins can not load because of the new version of the GNU C Library To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ardour/+bug/1872555/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864204] Re: nondeterministic failure when no keyring backends are available
** Changed in: launchpadlib Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864204 Title: nondeterministic failure when no keyring backends are available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpadlib/+bug/1864204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864204] Re: nondeterministic failure when no keyring backends are available
Fixed in launchpadlib 1.10.11. Thanks for the contribution. ** Changed in: launchpadlib Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: launchpadlib Milestone: None => 1.10.11 ** Changed in: launchpadlib Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864204 Title: nondeterministic failure when no keyring backends are available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpadlib/+bug/1864204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864204] Re: nondeterministic failure when no keyring backends are available
** Branch linked: lp:~ddstreet/launchpadlib/nosudo ** Also affects: launchpadlib Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864204 Title: nondeterministic failure when no keyring backends are available To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpadlib/+bug/1864204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0
Thanks for the data. I suspect the racy nature is why I can't reproduce it on my H/W, perhaps the I/O and/or CPU speeds are relevant in tripping the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861941 Title: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1861941/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0
I've tested this with 4.15, 5.0, 5.3 and 5.4 kernels on bionic, eoan and focal and I'm getting the same results, always a failure. I've not got it to work at all on 4.15.0 so far. I'm not sure why this is. Can you run this on a 4.15 based system and gather the output from bash -x ./test-bcache-byuuid-links.sh and provide: 1. the output of a bash -x run that works 2. the kernel version and release info Then I'll have a go at reproducing it again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861941 Title: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1861941/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0
** Changed in: linux-signed-5.4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux-signed-5.4 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Ian King (colin-king) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861941 Title: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1861941/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1866772] Re: Sys oopsed with sysfs test in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test on X-hwe ARM64
Tested on Bionic with kernel 4.15.0-97-generic #98 with reproducer and stress-ng sysfs test, fix worked fine. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866772 Title: Sys oopsed with sysfs test in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test on X-hwe ARM64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/stress-ng/+bug/1866772/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1866772] Re: Sys oopsed with sysfs test in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test on X-hwe ARM64
Focal passes autotest stress-ng tests: 14:06:30 INFO | Summary: 14:06:30 INFO | Stressors run: 191 14:06:30 INFO | Skipped: 1, binderfs 14:06:30 INFO | Failed: 0, 14:06:30 INFO | Oopsed: 0, 14:06:30 INFO | Oomed: 0, 14:06:30 INFO | Passed: 190, access af-alg affinity aio aiol bad-altstack bigheap branch brk cache cap chattr chdir chmod chown chroot clock close context cpu crypt cyclic daemon dccp dentry dev dev-shm dir dirdeep dnotify dup dynlib enosys env epoll eventfd fallocate fanotify fault fcntl fiemap fifo file-ioctl filename flock fork fp-error fstat full funcret futex get getdent getrandom handle hdd hrtimers icache icmp-flood inode-flags inotify io iomix ioprio ipsec-mb itimer judy key kill klog lease link locka lockbus lockf lockofd loop madvise malloc mcontend membarrier memfd memhotplug memrate memthrash mergesort mincore mknod mlock mmap mmapaddr mmapfixed mmapfork mmapmany mq mremap msg msync netdev netlink-proc netlink-task nice null open personality physpage pidfd pipe pipeherd pkey poll prctl procfs pthread ptrace pty radixsort ramfs rawdev rawsock readahead reboot rename revio rlimit rmap rtc schedpolicy sctp seal seccomp seek sem sem-sysv sendfile set shellsort shm shm-sysv sigfd sigfpe sigio sigpending sigpipe sigq sigrt sigsegv sigsuspend skiplist sleep sock sockabuse sockdiag sockmany softlockup splice stackmmap stream swap switch symlink sync-file sysbadaddr sysfs tee timer timerfd tlb-shootdown tmpfs tree tsearch tun udp udp-flood unshare urandom userfaultfd utime vdso vfork vm vm-addr vm-rw vm-segv vm-splice wait x86syscall yield zero zombie 14:06:30 INFO | Badret: 0, 14:06:30 INFO | 14:06:30 INFO | Tests took 972 seconds to run -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866772 Title: Sys oopsed with sysfs test in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test on X-hwe ARM64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/stress-ng/+bug/1866772/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1866772] Re: Sys oopsed with sysfs test in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test on X-hwe ARM64
Tested on Focal with kernel 5.4.0-23-generic #27-Ubuntu with reproducer and it works fine. There is another issue with the sysfs test, need to debug that and I'll file another bug for that. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866772 Title: Sys oopsed with sysfs test in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test on X-hwe ARM64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/stress-ng/+bug/1866772/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1866772] Re: Sys oopsed with sysfs test in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test on X-hwe ARM64
Tested on Eoan with kernel 5.3.0-47-generic #39-Ubuntu with reproducer and stress-ng sysfs test, fix worked fine. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-eoan ** Tags added: verification-done-eoan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866772 Title: Sys oopsed with sysfs test in ubuntu_stress_smoke_test on X-hwe ARM64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/stress-ng/+bug/1866772/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1871237] Re: debootstrap focal does not create systemd-* accounts
** Project changed: launchpad => ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871237 Title: debootstrap focal does not create systemd-* accounts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1871237/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1871232] Re: Removing zfsutils-linux/focal 0.8.3-1ubuntu11 package in a chroot environment tries to unmount all zfs datasets
** Project changed: launchpad => zfs-linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871232 Title: Removing zfsutils-linux/focal 0.8.3-1ubuntu11 package in a chroot environment tries to unmount all zfs datasets To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1871232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1871036] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 beta internet connection delay
** Project changed: launchpad => ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871036 Title: Ubuntu 20.04 beta internet connection delay To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1871036/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1853832] Re: stress-ng --timer-slack option should be a zero arg option, it currently skips over the next arg
** Tags removed: verification-failed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial ** Tags removed: verification-done-bionic ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853832 Title: stress-ng --timer-slack option should be a zero arg option, it currently skips over the next arg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/1853832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1860182] Re: zpool scrub malfunction after kernel upgrade
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860182 Title: zpool scrub malfunction after kernel upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1860182/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1870242] Re: Kernel oops in i915 on 5.4.0-18-generic
Looks like the work queue function for i915 driver is borked and is jumping to the wrong address. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870242 Title: Kernel oops in i915 on 5.4.0-18-generic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1870242/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1870193] [NEW] stress-ng in focal has a lot of static analysis issues that should be fixed
Public bug reported: I ran stress-ng through Coverity with a higher pedantic setting and found a lot more issues that should be fixed. These have been pushed to the stress-ng git repository and should be uploaded into focal to address these issues: stress-zlib: fix clang warning of array subscripted by char core-helper: make end-of-string assignment easier to comprehend stress-reboot: use heap for clone stack, cleans up static analysis warning core-cache: clean up pedantic warnings from static analysis stress-af-alg: fix several memory leaks stress-tun: fix close issues on sfd stress-xattr: be overly pedantic and memset array tmp stress-urandom: fix fd leak on fd_rnd_wr stress-sysbadaddr: fix incorrect 2nd paramater to utimes call stress-sockmany: fix fd leak, close file descriptor on error stress-sockabuse: ensure addrlen is set to the length of addr stress-sockabuse: close fd even when it is zero stress-sockabuse: avoid closing unopened fd on error stress-sock: ensure socklen setting is set before calling getsockopt stress-sigfd: voidify return of read, we don't care if it fails stress-sigfd: fix open error check stress-shm: use shim helper and ignore error return stress-ramfs: fix close of a -ve file descriptor stress-pipeherd: remove redundant variable n stress-mq: don't check values[prio] if prio is out of range stress-memhotplug: fix leak of opendir descriptor stress-judy: check allocated pvalue is not-null stress-eventfd: fix incorrect open failure check stress-cpu: gcd: fix potential multiply overflow stress-cpu: ensure i64 is stashed in stress_cpu_intconversion stress-clock: be extra pedantic and set and check timer_id values stress-chattr: handle open failure correctly stress-binderfs: fix failure error return path stress-af-alg: fix incorrect size of buffer to randomize core-helper: don't call ttyname a second time, use name instead core-helper: ensure data is null terminated core-cache: nullify a free'd cpus pointer before returning ** Affects: stress-ng (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Colin Ian King (colin-king) Status: Fix Committed ** Changed in: stress-ng (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: stress-ng (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: stress-ng (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Ian King (colin-king) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870193 Title: stress-ng in focal has a lot of static analysis issues that should be fixed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/1870193/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1856900] Re: stress-ng sysinfo stressor fails on ppc64el with linux 5.4.0-9.12
@Seth looking at the log it is run: 23:52:22 INFO | START timestamp=1585612342localtime=Mar 30 23:52:22 23:52:22 DEBUG| Persistent state client._record_indent now set to 1 23:52:22 INFO | START ubuntu_stress_smoke_test.setup ubuntu_stress_smoke_test.setup timestamp=1585612342localtime=Mar 30 23:52:22 23:52:22 DEBUG| Persistent state client._record_indent now set to 2 .. .. .. 00:08:23 DEBUG| [stdout] 00:08:23 DEBUG| [stdout] Summary: 00:08:23 DEBUG| [stdout] Stressors run: 191 00:08:23 DEBUG| [stdout] Skipped: 1, binderfs 00:08:23 DEBUG| [stdout] Failed: 0, 00:08:23 DEBUG| [stdout] Oopsed: 0, 00:08:23 DEBUG| [stdout] Oomed: 1, dev-shm 00:08:23 DEBUG| [stdout] Passed: 189, access af-alg affinity aio aiol bad-altstack bigheap branch brk cache cap chattr chdir chmod chown chroot clock close context cpu crypt cyclic daemon dccp dentry dev dir dirdeep dnotify dup dynlib enosys env epoll eventfd fallocate fanotify fault fcntl fiemap fifo file-ioctl filename flock fork fp-error fstat full funcret futex get getdent getrandom handle hdd hrtimers icache icmp-flood inode-flags inotify io iomix ioprio ipsec-mb itimer judy key kill klog lease link locka lockbus lockf lockofd loop madvise malloc mcontend membarrier memfd memhotplug memrate memthrash mergesort mincore mknod mlock mmap mmapaddr mmapfixed mmapfork mmapmany mq mremap msg msync netdev netlink-proc netlink-task nice null open personality physpage pidfd pipe pipeherd pkey poll prctl procfs pthread ptrace pty radixsort ramfs rawdev rawsock readahead reboot rename revio rlimit rmap rtc schedpolicy sctp seal seccomp seek sem sem-sysv sendfile set shellsort shm shm-sysv sigfd sigfpe sigio sigpending sigpipe sigq sigrt sigsegv sigsuspend skiplist sleep sock sockabuse sockdiag sockmany softlockup splice stackmmap stream swap switch symlink sync-file sysbadaddr sysfs tee timer timerfd tlb-shootdown tmpfs tree tsearch tun udp udp-flood unshare urandom userfaultfd utime vdso vfork vm vm-addr vm-rw vm-segv vm-splice wait x86syscall yield zero zombie 00:08:23 DEBUG| [stdout] Badret: 0, 00:08:23 DEBUG| [stdout] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856900 Title: stress-ng sysinfo stressor fails on ppc64el with linux 5.4.0-9.12 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1856900/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1856900] Re: stress-ng sysinfo stressor fails on ppc64el with linux 5.4.0-9.12
So I think we're in good condition now for 5.4.0-21 on ppc64el. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856900 Title: stress-ng sysinfo stressor fails on ppc64el with linux 5.4.0-9.12 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1856900/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1856900] Re: stress-ng sysinfo stressor fails on ppc64el with linux 5.4.0-9.12
I've manually re-run the tests on 5.4.0-18-generic on modoc several times and can't trip this issue. Is it possible to re-run all tests again to see if it fails when run from the test infrastructure? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856900 Title: stress-ng sysinfo stressor fails on ppc64el with linux 5.4.0-9.12 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1856900/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869802] Re: solr-jetty does not work - multiple issues
After trying solr-tomcat in place of solr-jetty, I get some more meaningful errors suggesting that the system won't start due to the lack of any base dataset. Navigating to the solr web page returns a stack trace suggesting: If you want solr to continue after configuration errors, change: false in solr.xml However this tag is not currently present in solr.xml, and adding it / retarting the service had no impact on the behaviour. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869802 Title: solr-jetty does not work - multiple issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lucene-solr/+bug/1869802/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869802] Re: solr-jetty does not work - multiple issues
(and it suggests that the primary issues are within solr-common) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869802 Title: solr-jetty does not work - multiple issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lucene-solr/+bug/1869802/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869802] [NEW] solr-jetty does not work - multiple issues
Public bug reported:
After installing solr-jetty and solr-common (3.6.2+dfsg-1) on Ubuntu
18.04.4 LTS, jetty starts and reports a banner page at
http://$HOST:8080/ but returns an error at http://$HOST:8080/solr/
(I'm guessing based on the config that this is the path - the
documentation explains *nothing*).
Although a directories /var/log/solr and /var/log/jetty9 are created,
there is nothing in them.
systemd is capturing some information that suggests something is going
wrong at startup:
? jetty9.service - Jetty 9 Web Application Server
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/jetty9.service; enabled; vendor preset:
enabled)
Active: active (running) since Mon 2020-03-30 22:27:39 BST; 13min ago
Docs: https://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/
Main PID: 1206 (java)
Tasks: 27 (limit: 2318)
CGroup: /system.slice/jetty9.service
+-1206 /usr/bin/java -Djetty.home=/usr/share/jetty9
-Djetty.base=/usr/share/jetty9 -Djava.io.tmpdir=/tmp -jar
/usr/share/jetty9/start.jar jetty.state=/var/lib/jetty9/jetty.state
jetty-started.xml
Mar 30 22:27:41 dev-a02-si-solr.bip jetty9[1206]: at
org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:1511)
Mar 30 22:27:41 dev-a02-si-solr.bip jetty9[1206]: at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
Mar 30 22:27:41 dev-a02-si-solr.bip jetty9[1206]: at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
Mar 30 22:27:41 dev-a02-si-solr.bip jetty9[1206]: at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
Mar 30 22:27:41 dev-a02-si-solr.bip jetty9[1206]: at
java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
Mar 30 22:27:41 dev-a02-si-solr.bip jetty9[1206]: at
org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:220)
Mar 30 22:27:41 dev-a02-si-solr.bip jetty9[1206]: at
org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:490)
Mar 30 22:27:41 dev-a02-si-solr.bip jetty9[1206]: at
org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:77)
Mar 30 22:27:41 dev-a02-si-solr.bip jetty9[1206]: 2020-03-30
22:27:41.475:INFO:oejs.AbstractConnector:main: Started
ServerConnector@51399530{HTTP/1.1,[http/1.1]}{0.0.0.0:8080}
Mar 30 22:27:41 dev-a02-si-solr.bip jetty9[1206]: 2020-03-30
22:27:41.475:INFO:oejs.Server:main: Started @1654ms
There are no setup instructions in /usr/share/doc/solr-jetty
i.e. issues are:
1) it doesn't appear to work
2) documentation is incomplete
3) default configuration is not writing any log files
** Affects: lucene-solr (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869802
Title:
solr-jetty does not work - multiple issues
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lucene-solr/+bug/1869802/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1867408] Re: openssh 8.2 waiting on libfido2 MIR
That MIR is now complete. ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867408 Title: openssh 8.2 waiting on libfido2 MIR To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1867408/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864439] Re: [MIR] libfido2, libcbor (dependencies of openssh)
Moved to main: $ change-override -s focal -c main -t libcbor Override component to main libcbor 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal: universe/misc -> main Override [y|N]? y 1 publication overridden. $ change-override -s focal -c main libcbor0.6 libcbor-dev Override component to main libcbor0.6 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libcbor0.6 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libcbor0.6 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal armhf: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libcbor0.6 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal i386: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libcbor0.6 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal ppc64el: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libcbor0.6 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal s390x: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libcbor-dev 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libcbor-dev 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libcbor-dev 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal armhf: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libcbor-dev 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal i386: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libcbor-dev 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal ppc64el: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libcbor-dev 0.6.0-0ubuntu1 in focal s390x: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main Override [y|N]? y 12 publications overridden. $ change-override -s focal -c main -t libfido2 Override component to main libfido2 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal: universe/misc -> main Override [y|N]? y 1 publication overridden. $ change-override -s focal -c main libfido2-1 libfido2-dev libfido2-doc Override component to main libfido2-1 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libfido2-1 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libfido2-1 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal armhf: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libfido2-1 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal i386: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libfido2-1 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal ppc64el: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libfido2-1 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal s390x: universe/libs/optional/100% -> main libfido2-dev 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal amd64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libfido2-dev 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal arm64: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libfido2-dev 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal armhf: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libfido2-dev 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal i386: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libfido2-dev 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal ppc64el: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libfido2-dev 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal s390x: universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main libfido2-doc 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal amd64: universe/doc/optional/100% -> main libfido2-doc 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal arm64: universe/doc/optional/100% -> main libfido2-doc 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal armhf: universe/doc/optional/100% -> main libfido2-doc 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal i386: universe/doc/optional/100% -> main libfido2-doc 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal ppc64el: universe/doc/optional/100% -> main libfido2-doc 1.3.1-1ubuntu2 in focal s390x: universe/doc/optional/100% -> main Override [y|N]? y 18 publications overridden. ** Changed in: libcbor (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: libfido2 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864439 Title: [MIR] libfido2, libcbor (dependencies of openssh) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcbor/+bug/1864439/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1853832] Re: stress-ng --timer-slack option should be a zero arg option, it currently skips over the next arg
The re-test on armhf worked, so this has passed testing if I understand the update excuses page. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853832 Title: stress-ng --timer-slack option should be a zero arg option, it currently skips over the next arg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/1853832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869395] [NEW] build failure when building with clang
Public bug reported: Building this package against the unstable kernel with clang I hit the following build failure: >/build/nvidia/390.132/build/common/inc/nv-linux.h: In function ‘nv_ioremap_nocache’: <>/build/nvidia/390.132/build/common/inc/nv-linux.h:556:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ioremap_nocache’; did you mean ‘ioremap_cache’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 556 | void *ptr = ioremap_nocache(phys, size); | ^~~ | ioremap_cache Building the same dkms package with gcc this works fine. I think clang is being more pedantic about the missing declaration for ioremap_nocache() ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869395 Title: build failure when building with clang To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-390/+bug/1869395/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1852608] Re: ZFS Severe Performance issue due to poorly supported feature
Refer to the following comment: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/9584#issuecomment-554725253 Probably won't disable this feature. ** Bug watch added: github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues #9584 https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/9584 ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852608 Title: ZFS Severe Performance issue due to poorly supported feature To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1852608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1857398] Re: ubiquity should support encryption by default with zfsroot, with users able to opt in to running change-key after install
Backporting that commit is rather non-trivial as it has some other change dependencies and it's quite a large change for the normal SRU process. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857398 Title: ubiquity should support encryption by default with zfsroot, with users able to opt in to running change-key after install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1857398/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1865236] Re: zsysctl inconsistency in handling snapshots/states
** Also affects: zsys (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: zsys (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865236 Title: zsysctl inconsistency in handling snapshots/states To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zsys/+bug/1865236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1843298] Re: Upgrade of datapool to ZFS 0.8 creates a problem if dual booting
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843298 Title: Upgrade of datapool to ZFS 0.8 creates a problem if dual booting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1843298/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858495] Re: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot
** Changed in: linux-signed-azure (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858495 Title: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-azure/+bug/1858495/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1854480] Re: zfs_arc_max not working anymore in zfs 0.8.1
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854480 Title: zfs_arc_max not working anymore in zfs 0.8.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1854480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1854480] Re: zfs_arc_max not working anymore in zfs 0.8.1
I'll close this bug report if that's OK. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854480 Title: zfs_arc_max not working anymore in zfs 0.8.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1854480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1806973] Re: zfs-dkms 0.7.9-3ubuntu6: zfs kernel module failed to build
The ZFS drivers are now provided by the kernel package and so zfs-dkms can be safely removed and will avoid this issue. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806973 Title: zfs-dkms 0.7.9-3ubuntu6: zfs kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1806973/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1852608] Re: ZFS Severe Performance issue due to poorly supported feature
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852608 Title: ZFS Severe Performance issue due to poorly supported feature To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1852608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1768962] Re: zfs-dkms 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu21: zfs kernel module failed to build
Apologies for taking so long to get around to triage this issue. If this is still an issue please attach the DKMS make.log file generated on the failed build. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768962 Title: zfs-dkms 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu21: zfs kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1768962/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1849982] Re: package zfs-dkms 0.8.1-1ubuntu14 failed to install/upgrade: installed zfs-dkms package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1849981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849981 If you are using the latest ZFS the drivers are built into the kernel so the zfs-dkms package should be removed. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1849981 package zfs-dkms 0.8.1-1ubuntu14 failed to install/upgrade: installed zfs-dkms package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849982 Title: package zfs-dkms 0.8.1-1ubuntu14 failed to install/upgrade: installed zfs-dkms package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1849982/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1838276] Re: zfs-module depedency selects random kernel package to install
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838276 Title: zfs-module depedency selects random kernel package to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1838276/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1849981] Re: package zfs-dkms 0.8.1-1ubuntu14 failed to install/upgrade: installed zfs-dkms package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10
If you are using the latest ZFS the drivers are built into the kernel so the zfs-dkms package should be removed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849981 Title: package zfs-dkms 0.8.1-1ubuntu14 failed to install/upgrade: installed zfs-dkms package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1849981/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869237] Re: Ubuntu 18.4.4 LTS AutoScreen Lock will not disable
** Project changed: launchpad => ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869237 Title: Ubuntu 18.4.4 LTS AutoScreen Lock will not disable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1869237/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1832088] Re: zpool import -f throws kernel Ooops
There has been no update, so I'm closing this bug. If this is still is an issue, please re-open this bug. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832088 Title: zpool import -f throws kernel Ooops To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1832088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1814983] Re: zfs poor sustained read performance from ssd pool
It may be worth reading the following article as it has some tuning tweaks that may help resolve your issue: https://www.bountysource.com/issues/46175251-arc_prune-high-load-and- soft-lockups ** Bug watch added: github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues #7559 https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/7559 ** Also affects: zfs via https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/7559 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814983 Title: zfs poor sustained read performance from ssd pool To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zfs/+bug/1814983/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1854480] Re: zfs_arc_max not working anymore in zfs 0.8.1
I've experimented with this on eoan and focal (ZFS 0.8.1 and ZFS 0.8.3)
on a 4GB VM image. I set the /etc/modprobe.d/zfs.conf as follows:
options zfs zfs_arc_max=134217728
# 128 MB
And rebooted. I then exercised the zfs with various greps and git logs
on the linux git repository while running:
while true; do cat /proc/spl/kstat/zfs/arcstats | grep -m 1 size | awk
'{ print $3 / (1024 * 1024) }'; sleep 1; done
The output shows that one does get arc sizes greater than the 128MB
while doing a lot of I/O but it settles down to sub 128MB once the I/O
activity is finished:
2.93295
2.93295
2.93295
63.8354
131.395
127.909
148.942
128.498
138.224
145.271
133.244
134.122
138.132
144.814
129.4
134.788
135.666
140.428
143.811
146.734
132.323
136.709
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
143.225
130.353
130.34
130.34
130.34
138.63
140.16
139.826
139.826
139.826
139.921
139.921
133.32
122.35
115.929
111.941
110.478
111.219
111.219
Two observations:
1. The driver does some sanity checks; if zfs_arc_max is too small (<
64MB) or too large (> physical memory size) then the setting is ignored
and the default is used. One can double check if the setting has been
updated by checking with c_max, e.g.:
grep c_max /proc/spl/kstat/zfs/arcstats
c_max 4134217728
If c_max is not the same as zfs_arc_max then the zfs_arc_max has worked.
Can you sanity check that?
2. With a high amount of throughput the arcstats show that the "size"
stat can overshot the zfs_arc_max setting but once I/O has completed it
will setting down to the threshold set. This setting is not updated
directly and is only sync'd during an arc_kstat update. So maybe it's a
snapshot that maybe transient and possibly not completely up to date.
Keeping the stats exactly up to date would cause a performance
bottleneck, so the stats are aggregated - I believe these values are not
exactly 100% correct as there is a performance impact in gathering and
summing the stats.
Perhaps you could experiment with a low zfs_arc_max setting (e.g. 128MB
134217728) and see if this works OK and then bumping up the value to see
if it stops working; then we can work out why it's going wrong at that
point.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854480
Title:
zfs_arc_max not working anymore in zfs 0.8.1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1854480/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869218] Re: FOOTER.html does not work on cdimage.ubuntu.com ppa.launchpad.net
We're not going to do this on ppa.launchpad.net; we should disable processing of arbitrary HTML instead, since it's not safe there (and is an obstacle to moving to HTTPS). (This comment doesn't apply to cdimage.ubuntu.com. I'm not sure about archive.ubuntu.com; I'm not sure I'm 100% comfortable with it there, but don't have a specific reason to forbid it.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869218 Title: FOOTER.html does not work on cdimage.ubuntu.com ppa.launchpad.net To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1869218/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869076] [NEW] FFE: germinate follow-build-depends-all feature
Public bug reported: I'd like to sync germinate 2.33 from unstable: germinate (2.33) unstable; urgency=medium [ Colin Watson ] * Document (no-)follow-build-depends in germinate(1). * Move Build-Depends-Indep to Build-Depends; some of these are needed during the clean target (e.g. python3-setuptools), and since germinate builds no architecture-dependent packages it isn't worth maintaining these lists separately. [ Steve Langasek ] * Add a new follow-build-depends-all feature. -- Colin Watson Sun, 22 Mar 2020 21:51:51 + Steve added the follow-build-depends-all feature back in November, and it's already been deployed to production and is used by the i386 seeds. I think it'd make sense for the packaged version of germinate in focal to be able to handle this. ** Affects: germinate (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869076 Title: FFE: germinate follow-build-depends-all feature To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/germinate/+bug/1869076/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1860182] Re: zpool scrub malfunction after kernel upgrade
autopkgtests tests passed - all looks sane. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860182 Title: zpool scrub malfunction after kernel upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1860182/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1862706] Re: segfaults, dpkg script failures
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862706 Title: segfaults, dpkg script failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1862706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858858] Re: aiol stressor not supported, but ran anyway
Tested and it's fixed on Bionic. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858858 Title: aiol stressor not supported, but ran anyway To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/stress-ng/+bug/1858858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1855851] Re: stress-ng mwc8() getting reset when mwc1() is called
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855851 Title: stress-ng mwc8() getting reset when mwc1() is called To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/1855851/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1853832] Re: stress-ng --timer-slack option should be a zero arg option, it currently skips over the next arg
Bionic: Argument is being parsed correctly. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853832 Title: stress-ng --timer-slack option should be a zero arg option, it currently skips over the next arg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/1853832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1855851] Re: stress-ng mwc8() getting reset when mwc1() is called
Bionic: random values look correct. Marking this is fixed. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855851 Title: stress-ng mwc8() getting reset when mwc1() is called To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/1855851/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858495] Re: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot
I added initcall debug and got some more data: The first delay: # [ 2.846188] localhost.localdomain kernel: AES CTR mode by8 optimization enabled # [ 5.919313] localhost.localdomain kernel: raid6: avx2x4 gen() 21512 MB/s There are some silent initializations occuring between these two points, mainly crypto code such as ghash, crc32, ccrt10dif, raid0, raid, libcrc32c etc. A fairly long pause of ~600ms occurs during the hv_netvsc initialization, this is the Hyper-V network driver, so that's expected to have some time variation and is dependant on the host. The second delay: # [ 5.159028] localhost.localdomain kernel: EXT4-fs (sda1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null) # [ 8.385284] localhost.localdomain systemd[1]: systemd 237 running in.. I can't seem to seem to reproduce the long delay, I'm seeing ~100-250ms delays between the invocation of the mount and the mount completion. I wonder if this is still a H/W issue where my VMs are different machines and performing faster. Anyhow, with the debug enabled I believe there is little going on between these two points apart from an ext4 mount. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858495 Title: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-azure/+bug/1858495/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858495] Re: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot
Thanks for the useful feedback, I'll enable some finer grained metrics tomorrow and see if I can pin point those longer delays. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858495 Title: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-azure/+bug/1858495/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858495] Re: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot
Some of the early kernel boot time variations occur when detecting and spinning up devices sda and sbd and reading the partition information. Given this is probably spinny disc media, one would expect variations of this kind in early boot. The other variations I can see are also due to probing of hardware, which again is probably expected. I'm finding it hard to see anything really too problematic with the kernel side boot timings given that we are dealing with H/W style variations in the boot. If there are issues that are glaring and I'm missing it, can you point me to them? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858495 Title: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-azure/+bug/1858495/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858495] Re: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot
And also data for bug-bionic-baseline-no-templating-Standard-DS2-v2.csv attached ** Attachment added: "Results-baseline-no-templating-Standard-DS2-v2.ods" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-azure/+bug/1858495/+attachment/5340630/+files/Results-baseline-no-templating-Standard-DS2-v2.ods -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858495 Title: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-azure/+bug/1858495/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858495] Re: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot
Hi Ryan, I analysed the data from comment #6 using the journal.log from bug- bionic-baseline-after-templating-Standard-DS2-v2 and collated some notable places in the boot process and compared boots 1 through to 10. Attached are the results as a LibreOffice Calc spread sheet. The data shows a little bit of timing variance (which is not surprising) but on the whole the data looks very similar from boot to boot. So I can't see what's particularly wrong with the boot timings in that scenario. Any comments on that? Data: see attached. ** Attachment added: "LibreOffice |Calc spread sheet of boot timings from provided data in comment #6" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-azure/+bug/1858495/+attachment/5340629/+files/Results-templating-Standard-DS2-v2.ods -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858495 Title: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-azure/+bug/1858495/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1860182] Re: zpool scrub malfunction after kernel upgrade
The autopkgtests are working fine now after a re-trigger. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860182 Title: zpool scrub malfunction after kernel upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1860182/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847832] Re: Backport ZoL pull request 9203 into the official packages.
I've exercised this fix with the new zfsutils-linux package and zfs-dkms using the ubuntu zfs autotest regression tests: ubuntu_zfs_smoke_test ubuntu_zfs_fstest ubuntu_zfs_xfs_generic ubuntu_zfs_stress ..no regressions found. These tests also touch zfs rollbacks. I don't see any regressions, so this passed testing and I'm happy for this to be released. ** Tags added: verification-done-eoan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847832 Title: Backport ZoL pull request 9203 into the official packages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1847832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868498] [NEW] Typo in package description
Public bug reported: The package description reads "LXD - VM agent loeader", which I expect is a typo for "loader". ** Affects: lxd-agent-loader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868498 Title: Typo in package description To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd-agent-loader/+bug/1868498/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868496] [NEW] Wrong upstream information in debian/copyright?
Public bug reported: debian/copyright starts with: Format: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Upstream-Name: lxd Upstream-Contact: lxc-de...@lists.linuxcontainers.org Source: https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/downloads Upstream-Name seems wrong for lxd-agent-loader, and I don't see anything about an agent loader on https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/downloads - maybe it would be better to omit Source in this case, since it's a native package? ** Affects: lxd-agent-loader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868496 Title: Wrong upstream information in debian/copyright? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd-agent-loader/+bug/1868496/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1867775] Re: Sync pagure 5.8.1+dfsg-3 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
In order that the IRC comment not be lost: 03:42 Conan Kudo: Hm. What is that actually fixing? You say “basically no risk”, but the second changelog entry suggests that the first one broke the package (I'm just being a secretary here - I haven't thought about this bug at all.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867775 Title: Sync pagure 5.8.1+dfsg-3 (universe) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pagure/+bug/1867775/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858495] Re: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot
Can you update the bug with the output from the command: cat /proc/cmdline I wonder if an overly pessimistic rootdelay setting is being used. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858495 Title: multiple long delays during kernel and userspace boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-azure/+bug/1858495/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1860780] Re: buildd images have a very plain sources.list
Launchpad always puts exactly the sources.list it wants to use in place before doing pretty much anything else with the image, so it makes no difference to us. IIRC we decided that having -updates and -security there was useful for snapcraft. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860780 Title: buildd images have a very plain sources.list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1860780/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1799497] Re: 4.15 kernel hard lockup about once a week
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799497 Title: 4.15 kernel hard lockup about once a week To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1799497/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1670137] Re: cache on NVMe inhibits proper suspend/hibernate - zfs l2arc
I'm closing this bug due to inactivity for over a year. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670137 Title: cache on NVMe inhibits proper suspend/hibernate - zfs l2arc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1670137/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1799497] Re: 4.15 kernel hard lockup about once a week
** No longer affects: zram-config (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: zram-config (Ubuntu Bionic) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799497 Title: 4.15 kernel hard lockup about once a week To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1799497/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1863989] Re: bad-altstack test from ubuntu_stress_smoke_test failed on Eoan zVM
** Changed in: stress-ng Status: Invalid => Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu-kernel-tests Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: stress-ng Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863989 Title: bad-altstack test from ubuntu_stress_smoke_test failed on Eoan zVM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/stress-ng/+bug/1863989/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1838276] Re: zfs-module depedency selects random kernel package to install
I think the current dependencies are OK and that special casing this kind of system without a default kernel is not an expected case. I'd rather this bug is closed. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838276 Title: zfs-module depedency selects random kernel package to install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1838276/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847832] Re: Backport ZoL pull request 9203 into the official packages.
** Description changed:
+ == SRU Justification, EOAN ==
+
+ ZFS can deadlock, this can be sometimes triggered with a zfs rollback -
+ "the zfs_resume_fs() code path may cause zfs to spawn new threads as it
+ reinstantiates the suspended fs's zil. When a new thread is spawned, the
+ kernel may attempt to free memory for that thread by freeing some
+ unreferenced inodes. If it happens to select inodes that are a a part of
+ the suspended fs a deadlock will occur because freeing inodes requires
+ holding the fs's z_teardown_inactive_lock which is still held from the
+ suspend."
+
+ == The Fix ==
+
+ Backport of ZFS upstream commit e7a2fa70c3b0d8c8cee2b484038bb5623c7c1ea9
+ ("Fix deadlock in 'zfs rollback'")
+
+ The backport is relatively simple context wiggle.
+
+ == Test Case ==
+
+ This is hard to trigger so testing is non-trivial. To check for
+ regressions we run the entire Ubuntu ZFS regression test suite. Without
+ the fix rollbacks can very occasionally trip this issue. With the test,
+ it's not possible.
+
+ == Regression Potential ==
+
+ The fix adds in an extra z_suspended flag to track suspended state and
+ adds an extra reference to stop the kernel from free'ing inodes on a
+ suspected file system. The changes are small and are well-used in
+ upstream ZFS so I believe if a regression was to have occurred it would
+ have been found by the regression testing.
+
+ - Original Bug Report Below ---
+
Hopefully this is the correct bug tracker to report this on.
Recently, I ran into a bug in ZFS as shipped in Ubuntu 19.10 that caused
the kernel to deadlock and the system to eventually hang.
I was advised by a ZFS on Linux project maintainer that this was a bug
that was fixed in 0.8.2.
The relevant pull request is here:
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/9203
It would probably be a good idea to backport that pull request into
19.10's build of ZFS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847832
Title:
Backport ZoL pull request 9203 into the official packages.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1847832/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1854480] Re: zfs_arc_max not working anymore in zfs 0.8.1
Just for clarification, how are you determining that zfs is using more memory for the L1ARC? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854480 Title: zfs_arc_max not working anymore in zfs 0.8.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1854480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847832] Re: Backport ZoL pull request 9203 into the official packages.
The fix in question is: commit e7a2fa70c3b0d8c8cee2b484038bb5623c7c1ea9 Author: Tom Caputi Date: Tue Aug 27 12:55:51 2019 -0400 Fix deadlock in 'zfs rollback' Currently, the 'zfs rollback' code can end up deadlocked due to the way the kernel handles unreferenced inodes on a suspended fs. Essentially, the zfs_resume_fs() code path may cause zfs to spawn new threads as it reinstantiates the suspended fs's zil. When a new thread is spawned, the kernel may attempt to free memory for that thread by freeing some unreferenced inodes. If it happens to select inodes that are a a part of the suspended fs a deadlock will occur because freeing inodes requires holding the fs's z_teardown_inactive_lock which is still held from the suspend. This patch corrects this issue by adding an additional reference to all inodes that are still present when a suspend is initiated. This prevents them from being freed by the kernel for any reason. Reviewed-by: Alek Pinchuk Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf Signed-off-by: Tom Caputi Closes #9203 ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Ian King (colin-king) ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847832 Title: Backport ZoL pull request 9203 into the official packages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1847832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1832088] Re: zpool import -f throws kernel Ooops
Is this still and issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832088 Title: zpool import -f throws kernel Ooops To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1832088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1832088] Re: zpool import -f throws kernel Ooops
Correction: Is this still an issue? ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Ian King (colin-king) ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832088 Title: zpool import -f throws kernel Ooops To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1832088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1854480] Re: zfs_arc_max not working anymore in zfs 0.8.1
Maybe I'm missing something here. I tested this out on an Eoan server: $ dmesg | grep ZFS [ 10.821332] ZFS: Loaded module v0.8.1-1ubuntu14.3, ZFS pool version 5000, ZFS filesystem version 5 $ uname -a Linux eaon-amd64 5.3.0-42-generic #34-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 28 05:49:40 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I added a zfs_arc_max setting into the zfs.conf: cat /etc/modprobe.d/zfs.conf options zfs zfs_arc_max=50331648 rebooted and I get: cat /sys/module/zfs/parameters/zfs_arc_max 50331648 So this is setting the L1ARC size as I expected. Can you explain further the issue you are seeing? ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Ian King (colin-king) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854480 Title: zfs_arc_max not working anymore in zfs 0.8.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1854480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1848597] Re: zfs-linux 0.8.1-1ubuntu14 ADT test failure with linux 5.4.0-1.2
Oops, I mean @Seth. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848597 Title: zfs-linux 0.8.1-1ubuntu14 ADT test failure with linux 5.4.0-1.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1848597/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1848597] Re: zfs-linux 0.8.1-1ubuntu14 ADT test failure with linux 5.4.0-1.2
@Sean, does this still need some attention or shall we re-run the test and/or close this bug? ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Ian King (colin-king) ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848597 Title: zfs-linux 0.8.1-1ubuntu14 ADT test failure with linux 5.4.0-1.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1848597/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1862706] Re: segfaults, dpkg script failures
I'm not able to reproduce this issue. Is it still a problem? ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Ian King (colin-king) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862706 Title: segfaults, dpkg script failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1862706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847628] Re: When using swap in ZFS, system stops when you start using swap
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847628 Title: When using swap in ZFS, system stops when you start using swap To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/1847628/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1840161] Re: Very severe regression in ZFS 0.7.12 in 18.04.3
The root cause is documented in bug: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/8458 ** Bug watch added: github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues #8458 https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/8458 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840161 Title: Very severe regression in ZFS 0.7.12 in 18.04.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1840161/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1860182] Re: zpool scrub malfunction after kernel upgrade
@SRU folk, can this expedited as this does affect ZFS scrubs with HWE kernels and it is a relatively simple userspace fix? ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860182 Title: zpool scrub malfunction after kernel upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1860182/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1866730] Re: Need patch for post 5.5 low-latency kernels
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866730 Title: Need patch for post 5.5 low-latency kernels To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1866730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1866730] Re: Need patch for post 5.5 low-latency kernels
Thanks for the update on this compat fix. I've tested this on: upstream 5.6-rc5 lowlatency + generic upstream 5.5 lowlatency + generic ubuntu 5.4.0-18 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866730 Title: Need patch for post 5.5 low-latency kernels To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1866730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1866788] [NEW] Sync psst 1.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync psst 1.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Version 1.0-1 is basically the same as 0.1-11 with a new 1.0 tarball and the debian patches removed since they are all now merged into the upstream 1.0-1 version. Changelog entries since current focal version 0.1-11: psst (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Sync with upstream version 1.0 - remove debian patches as these are now all integrated into the upstream 1.0 version -- Colin King Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:49:23 + ** Affects: psst (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: psst (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866788 Title: Sync psst 1.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psst/+bug/1866788/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1866730] Re: Need patch for post 5.5 low-latency kernels
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Ian King (colin-king) ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866730 Title: Need patch for post 5.5 low-latency kernels To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1866730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1853832] Re: stress-ng --timer-slack option should be a zero arg option, it currently skips over the next arg
I've re-uploaded the bionic version ready for another SRU test -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853832 Title: stress-ng --timer-slack option should be a zero arg option, it currently skips over the next arg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stress-ng/+bug/1853832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1863989] Re: bad-altstack test from ubuntu_stress_smoke_test failed on Eoan zVM
Can this be re-tested to see if this now fails after I cleaned up kernel03? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863989 Title: bad-altstack test from ubuntu_stress_smoke_test failed on Eoan zVM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/stress-ng/+bug/1863989/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858858] Re: aiol stressor not supported, but ran anyway
I've re-uploaded the bionic version with the necessary fixes ready for a re-test for SRU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858858 Title: aiol stressor not supported, but ran anyway To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/stress-ng/+bug/1858858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858858] Re: aiol stressor not supported, but ran anyway
Verified eoan 0.10.07-1ubuntu4 is fixed. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-eoan ** Tags added: verification-done-eoan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858858 Title: aiol stressor not supported, but ran anyway To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/stress-ng/+bug/1858858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1814611] Re: turning off "Send error reports to Canonical" prevents using ubuntu-bug
It certainly caused me to waste some time trying to work out why it was not sending them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814611 Title: turning off "Send error reports to Canonical" prevents using ubuntu- bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1814611/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1852119] Re: Please add zfs modules to linux-raspi2
The Ubuntu kernel team recommends to have at least 4GB of free memory to run ZFS on slow backing store devices for nominal performance. Since there is OS overhead (kernel, userspace processes etc) a 4GB Raspberry Pi will perform sub-optimally. Note that the document you referenced in commet #1 states: "Computers that have less than 2 GiB of memory run ZFS slowly. 4 GiB of memory is recommended for normal performance in basic workloads. " Once you start to add in ZFS options such as compression and/or run scrubs on a slow device it is likely you may start to see high memory pressure issues occurring. Hence we do not support ZFS unless you have at least 4GB of memory free. ** Changed in: linux-raspi2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix ** Changed in: linux-raspi2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852119 Title: Please add zfs modules to linux-raspi2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi2/+bug/1852119/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1865919] Re: Desktop Icons settings not working in Tweaks
** Project changed: launchpad => gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865919 Title: Desktop Icons settings not working in Tweaks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-tweaks/+bug/1865919/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1773457] Re: Full-system encryption needs to be supported out-of-the-box including /boot and should not delete other installed systems
+1 to this issue. My new work laptop only has one drive. We require Windows for some tasks but Linux for others. Full drive encryption is mandatory for laptops and other portable devices. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773457 Title: Full-system encryption needs to be supported out-of-the-box including /boot and should not delete other installed systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1773457/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1863989] Re: bad-altstack test from ubuntu_stress_smoke_test failed on Eoan zVM
I found this was failing on kernel03 because there was very little space for the test to enable a large swap file. I cleaned the machine up and was unable to reproduce the failure. I'm assuming the tests were failing on kernel03, if not what machine were they being run on? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863989 Title: bad-altstack test from ubuntu_stress_smoke_test failed on Eoan zVM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/stress-ng/+bug/1863989/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
