[Bug 1969945] [NEW] Update background preference for 22.04 (jammy)

2022-04-22 Thread Craig G
Public bug reported:

The vanilla-gnome-default-settings package does not revert the Ubuntu
background/screensaver images to gnome behavior in 22.04.

vanilla-gnome-default-settings contains the file
/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/20_vanilla-gnome-default-
settings.gschema.override for reinstating most gnome default settings.
The keys org.gnome.desktop.background.picture-uri and
org.gnome.desktop.screensaver.picture-uri currently point to the file
/usr/share/backgrounds/gnome/adwaita-timed.xml, which was removed from
the gnome-backgrounds package in 22.04.  The removal appears to be
related to a change in the way Gnome 42 handles background images in the
context of light/dark theme preferences.

gnome-control-center seems to be in a halfway migrated state between
Gnome 41 and 42, so I'm not completely sure I understand what the right
fix here should be...  Simply updating the keys to point to (what
appears to be the new equivalent file?) /usr/share/gnome-background-
properties/adwaita.xml doesn't change anything.  I think a minimal
(short term?) fix is to set

[org.gnome.desktop.background]
picture-uri='file:///usr/share/backgrounds/gnome/adwaita-l.jpg'
picture-uri-dark='file:///usr/share/backgrounds/gnome/adwaita-d.jpg'

There is not an equivalent 'dark' version of the key for the screensaver
portion, though...  There are also some new 'primary-color', 'secondary-
color' keys which should probably be considered (their upstream gnome
values appear to be '#023c88' and '#5789ca' respectively).

** Affects: ubuntu-gnome-default-settings (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969945

Title:
  Update background preference for 22.04 (jammy)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-gnome-default-settings/+bug/1969945/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960080] Re: libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_exit to work

2022-02-07 Thread Craig G
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1958594 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958594

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1958594
   Boot error: libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_exit to work

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960080

Title:
  libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_exit to work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/1960080/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960080] [NEW] libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_exit to work

2022-02-04 Thread Craig G
Public bug reported:

I'm unable to decrypt my root partition at boot using the cryptsetup-
initramfs package currently in jammy (2:2.4.2-1ubuntu4).  I get the
askpass prompt, but after entering the password, decryption fails with
the error message:

  libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_exit to work

and I'm prompted to retry.

This library indeed seems to be missing from the initrd file:

  lsinitramfs /boot/initrd.img-5.15.0-18-generic | grep libgcc

Compared with an identically configured image running impish:

  lsinitramfs /boot/initrd.img-5.13.0-28-generic | grep libgcc
  usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1

I noticed the following line in the jammy changelog:

  * cryptsetup-initramfs now requires initramfs-tools 0.137 or later and no
longer copies libgcc_s.so.1 to the initrd since recent initramfs-tools
take care of it.

And found the following lines in the impish version of
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/cryptroot:

  # libargon2 uses pthread_cancel
  for so in $(ldconfig -p | sed -nr 's/^\s*libgcc_s\.so.*=>\s*//p'); do
  copy_exec "$so"
  done

Which are not in the jammy version.  Adding an explicit copy_exec line
for this library and rebuilding the initrd file fixes the problem.

I'm not exactly sure which binary in the cryptsetup initrd inclusion
requires this library (it doesn't appear to be the askpass nor
cryptsetup binaries), but whatever it is doesn't seem to be properly
declaring its dependency for inclusion.

I also don't completely understand the changelog message that implies
inclusion of this library is now the responsibility of initramfs-
tools...

** Affects: cryptsetup (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960080

Title:
  libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_exit to work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/1960080/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1577800] Re: Frequent disconnects with Intel 8260 wireless NIC

2017-01-03 Thread Craig G
I haven't had any problems since upgrading to yakkety:
4.8.0-30-generic #32-Ubuntu
driver: iwlwifi
version: 4.8.0-30-generic
firmware-version: 22.361476.0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577800

Title:
  Frequent disconnects with Intel 8260 wireless NIC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1577800/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1336663] Re: lightdm uses wrong ccache name on pam_krb5 credentials refresh

2016-06-27 Thread Craig G
FWIW, this issue is also present using gdm3 in Ubuntu 16.04.  With
pam_krb5's debug option set, I see the following during initial login
(with successful credential cache construction):

gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:auth): pam_sm_authenticate: entry
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:auth): (user cgallek) attempting 
authentication as cgal...@.com
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:auth): user cgallek authenticated as 
cgal...@.com
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:auth): (user cgallek) temporarily storing 
credentials in /tmp/krb5cc_pam_LB8CeL
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:auth): pam_sm_authenticate: exit (success)
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:setcred): pam_sm_setcred: entry (establish)
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:setcred): (user cgallek) initializing 
ticket cache FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_1000_3BiTY0
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:setcred): pam_sm_setcred: exit (success)


When unlocking the screen, I see the following successful credential refresh, 
but to the wrong cache filename (/tmp/krb5cc_0):

gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:auth): pam_sm_authenticate: entry
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:auth): (user cgallek) attempting 
authentication as cgal...@angrydoughnuts.com
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:auth): user cgallek authenticated as 
cgal...@.com
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:auth): (user cgallek) temporarily storing 
credentials in /tmp/krb5cc_pam_Dkg5Ip
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:auth): pam_sm_authenticate: exit (success)
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:setcred): pam_sm_setcred: entry (reinit)
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:setcred): (user cgallek) refreshing ticket 
cache /tmp/krb5cc_0
gdm-password]: pam_krb5(gdm-password:setcred): pam_sm_setcred: exit (success)

The _0 cache that is created has the correct new credential in it, but
is obviously not known by any other process as it does not match the
earlier version of $KRB5CCNAME.  I imagine this is the same issue
described above where the $KRB5CCNAME environment variable is not
available in the gdm context which unlocks the screen.

It's worth noting that in the GDM case, there appears to be a per-
session helper process (gdm-session-worker) used to communicate with the
GDM service.  This process _does not_ have the $KRB5CCNAME variable set
in its environment.  Would storing the value in this processes
environment fix the problem?

~: ps -ef | grep gdm-session-worker
root 11364 11203  0 Jun25 ?00:00:00 gdm-session-worker 
[pam/gdm-password]

~: cat /proc/11364/environ 
LANG=en_US.UTF-8PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/binGDM_SESSION_DBUS_ADDRESS=unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-oTnmcExV


** Also affects: gdm
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336663

Title:
  lightdm uses wrong ccache name on pam_krb5 credentials refresh

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdm/+bug/1336663/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1577800] Re: Frequent disconnects with Intel 8260 wireless NIC

2016-06-05 Thread Craig G
I'm not sure I would say it worked well, but it did fix one of two
problems.  The second was only fixed after both driver and firmware
upgrades.  I'm no longer running the 19.ucode version.  Would apport
data for the 21 version with the updated driver be useful?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577800

Title:
  Frequent disconnects with Intel 8260 wireless NIC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1577800/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1577800] Re: Frequent disconnects with Intel 8260 wireless NIC

2016-06-05 Thread Craig G
I used version Core18 of the iwlwifi backports repository:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/backport-iwlwifi.git/log/?h=release/LinuxCore18

and the current ubuntu 4.4 kernel with the following dkms.conf:
MAKE="'make' -j 12 KERNELDIR=/lib/modules/${kernelver}/build"
CLEAN="/bin/true"
PACKAGE_NAME=iwlwifi
PACKAGE_VERSION=Core18
REMAKE_INITRD=yes

BUILT_MODULE_NAME[0]=compat
BUILT_MODULE_LOCATION[0]=compat
DEST_MODULE_LOCATION[0]=/kernel/compat

BUILT_MODULE_NAME[1]=cfg80211
BUILT_MODULE_LOCATION[1]=net/wireless
DEST_MODULE_LOCATION[1]=/kernel/net/wireless

BUILT_MODULE_NAME[2]=mac80211
BUILT_MODULE_LOCATION[2]=net/mac80211
DEST_MODULE_LOCATION[2]=/kernel/net/mac80211

BUILT_MODULE_NAME[3]=iwlwifi
BUILT_MODULE_LOCATION[3]=drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi
DEST_MODULE_LOCATION[3]=/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi

BUILT_MODULE_NAME[4]=iwlmvm
BUILT_MODULE_LOCATION[4]=drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm
DEST_MODULE_LOCATION[4]=/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm

BUILT_MODULE_NAME[5]=iwlxvt
BUILT_MODULE_LOCATION[5]=drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/xvt
DEST_MODULE_LOCATION[5]=/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/xvt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577800

Title:
  Frequent disconnects with Intel 8260 wireless NIC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1577800/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1577800] Re: Frequent disconnects with Intel 8260 wireless NIC

2016-06-04 Thread Craig G
It did indeed fix the problem I was seeing in this bug report.  However,
I started having another less frequent issue shortly after (also
disconnects, but completely different errors).  I was only able to solve
that one by getting the newest firmware (-21.ucode) AND rebuilding the
iwlwifi modules with the latest version of the upstream driver code.
I'm not sure exactly which change in the driver fixed my issue, though.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577800

Title:
  Frequent disconnects with Intel 8260 wireless NIC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1577800/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1577800] Re: Frequent disconnects with Intel 8260 wireless NIC

2016-05-03 Thread Craig G
Please see the upstream bug report for all of the necessary debugging
logs.  However, the bug has already been identified and the issue here
is really just deciding how to package the fix.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577800

Title:
  Frequent disconnects with Intel 8260 wireless NIC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1577800/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1577800] [NEW] Frequent disconnects with Intel 8260 wireless NIC

2016-05-03 Thread Craig G
Public bug reported:

This issue has been resolved upstream and is described in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117391

The current Ubuntu Xenial Xerus kernel (4.4.0-21.37) is built with a
version of the iwlwifi driver which supports firmware version up to
iwlwifi-8000C-19.ucode.  However, the matching linux-firmware package
ships with the -16.ucode version of the firmware, which contains this
bug.

The next stable version of the firmware after -16.ucode is -21.ucode,
but is not supported by the version of the iwlwifi driver in the 4.4.0
kernel.  In order to fix this issue, either the minor version of the
firmware (-19.ucode) needs to be included in the linux-firmware package
or the iwlwifi driver in the kernel package needs to be upgraded with a
backport of the iwlwifi driver new enough to support the -21.ucode
firmware.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577800

Title:
  Frequent disconnects with Intel 8260 wireless NIC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1577800/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1475954] Re: grub does not validate kernel signature during secure boot

2015-07-23 Thread Craig G
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475954

Title:
  grub does not validate kernel signature during secure boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1475954/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1475954] Re: grub does not validate kernel signature during secure boot

2015-07-23 Thread Craig G
Thanks for the update.  Do you know if it's even possible to use grub to
verify the signatures of the currently distributed signed Ubuntu
kernels?  As far as I can tell, grub only supports gpg detached
signatures.  The Ubuntu kernels seem to be signed using  sbsigntool with
an X509 certificate and private key.

If not, I believe the only way to actually use secure boot with an
Ubuntu kernel is to directly load the kernel from the EFI without using
grub...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475954

Title:
  grub does not validate kernel signature during secure boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1475954/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1279116] Re: Missing tmp directory for GSSAPI authentication

2014-02-12 Thread Craig G
Thanks for the quick response.  I started poking around in the debian bugs 
database and found a similar issue described here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606007

I submitted a comment asking to have the tmp directory added to the
chroot tree.

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #606007
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606007

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279116

Title:
  Missing tmp directory for GSSAPI authentication

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1279116/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1279116] Re: Missing tmp directory for GSSAPI authentication

2014-02-12 Thread Craig G
Thanks for the quick response.  I started poking around in the debian bugs 
database and found a similar issue described here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606007

I submitted a comment asking to have the tmp directory added to the
chroot tree.

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #606007
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606007

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279116

Title:
  Missing tmp directory for GSSAPI authentication

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1279116/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1279116] [NEW] Missing tmp directory for GSSAPI authentication

2014-02-11 Thread Craig G
Public bug reported:

I had some trouble getting GSSAPI authentication in postfix working when
moving my mail system to a new machine.  GSSAPI is a bit complicated
with postfix since it runs in a chroot jail.  There are several guides
available for this process (in particular, getting the keytab and
krb5.conf files in the right place), and I did have it working on my
previous machine, so I was pretty sure I had the configuration correct
and that there was something wrong with the newly installed system.

Postfix was producing the following errors in the system log:
postfix/smtpd[5099]: warning: SASL authentication failure: GSSAPI Error: 
Unspecified GSS failure.  Minor code may provide more information ()
postfix/smtpd[5099]: warning: host[x.x.x.x]: SASL GSSAPI authentication failed: 
generic failure.

That error was not terribly useful, but strace-ing the smtpd process produced 
the source of the real error:
lstat(/var/tmp/smtp_118, 0x7fffcafd42f0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
unlink(/var/tmp/smtp_118) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/var/tmp/smtp_118, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_TRUNC, 0600) = -1 ENOENT 
(No such file or directory)
unlink(/var/tmp/smtp_118) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)

The process was unable to create a credential cache because the /var/tmp
directory did not exist under the chroot filesystem.  Creating the
directory /var/spool/postfix/var/tmp with postfix-writeable permissions
fixed the problem and GSSAPI authentication started working.

I'm not exactly sure why the gssapi library was using /var/tmp instead
of /tmp (which didn't exist either).  kerberos credentials for the rest
of my system are stored in /tmp.

I think the postfix package should be altered to include a /var/tmp
directory in the chroot file hierarchy.  If that is not possible, the
gssapi configuration within the chroot should be setup to use a
different directory for the credential cache, which does exist and has
the proper permissions.

** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279116

Title:
  Missing tmp directory for GSSAPI authentication

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1279116/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1279116] [NEW] Missing tmp directory for GSSAPI authentication

2014-02-11 Thread Craig G
Public bug reported:

I had some trouble getting GSSAPI authentication in postfix working when
moving my mail system to a new machine.  GSSAPI is a bit complicated
with postfix since it runs in a chroot jail.  There are several guides
available for this process (in particular, getting the keytab and
krb5.conf files in the right place), and I did have it working on my
previous machine, so I was pretty sure I had the configuration correct
and that there was something wrong with the newly installed system.

Postfix was producing the following errors in the system log:
postfix/smtpd[5099]: warning: SASL authentication failure: GSSAPI Error: 
Unspecified GSS failure.  Minor code may provide more information ()
postfix/smtpd[5099]: warning: host[x.x.x.x]: SASL GSSAPI authentication failed: 
generic failure.

That error was not terribly useful, but strace-ing the smtpd process produced 
the source of the real error:
lstat(/var/tmp/smtp_118, 0x7fffcafd42f0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or 
directory)
unlink(/var/tmp/smtp_118) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/var/tmp/smtp_118, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_TRUNC, 0600) = -1 ENOENT 
(No such file or directory)
unlink(/var/tmp/smtp_118) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)

The process was unable to create a credential cache because the /var/tmp
directory did not exist under the chroot filesystem.  Creating the
directory /var/spool/postfix/var/tmp with postfix-writeable permissions
fixed the problem and GSSAPI authentication started working.

I'm not exactly sure why the gssapi library was using /var/tmp instead
of /tmp (which didn't exist either).  kerberos credentials for the rest
of my system are stored in /tmp.

I think the postfix package should be altered to include a /var/tmp
directory in the chroot file hierarchy.  If that is not possible, the
gssapi configuration within the chroot should be setup to use a
different directory for the credential cache, which does exist and has
the proper permissions.

** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279116

Title:
  Missing tmp directory for GSSAPI authentication

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1279116/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1188364] [NEW] grub-install will install a misconfigured EFI image on removable media when /boot is also on the removable media

2013-06-06 Thread Craig G
Public bug reported:

With vanilla grub, grub-install with the --removable flag will install
in the grubx64.efi file in the EFI/BOOT directory of an efi partition.
If the --boot-directory flag is used, grub-install will also generate a
configuration file in EFI/BOOT which will try to source the grub.cfg
file from the supplied boot directory.  For example, in my case, the
following grub.cfg file is generated:

search.fs_uuid e83c44ec-cedd-11e2-874f-4c72b927200b root hd1,msdos1  
set prefix=($root)/grub
configfile $prefix/grub.cfg

Here, the UUID is the boot partition of my system and that the prefix
used is relative to the supplied boot directory and does not contain the
string 'boot'.

The standard grubx64.efi generated by grub-mkimage (specifically, not
using the -c option to include a configuration file) uses a heuristic to
try to find a configuration file.  The first step of this heuristic is
to look in the local directory.  Using a vanilla grubx64.efi built with
grub-mkimage, grub-install correctly installs the efi boot loader, the
above configuration file, and the system boots by sourcing the real
grub.cfg file on the referenced boot partition.

In this change:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/raring/grub2/raring/revision/154
A script was added to the ubuntu packaging of grub which builds custom versions 
of the grub efi boot loader image.  Specifically, the 'gcd' version of the 
loader built with grub-mkimage on line 62 is built with a default configuration 
in it labeled Skeleton configuration file which finds the real boot disk.  
This configuration unconditionally sets the prefix to ($root)/boot/grub and 
makes the assumption that the grub directory will be in a directory called boot 
on the root partition rather than on a dedicated partition.  Further, it 
assumes that the root partition will contain an info or a mini-info file.  This 
breaks the chain loading described above by removing the part of the 
configuration search heuristic that looks in the local directory.

I don't completely understand why the grub-install script uses the gcd
loader in the removable case (http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
branches/ubuntu/raring/grub2/raring/view/head:/util/grub-
install.in#L837).  I also don't completely understand why the ubuntu
customization of the gcd loader needs to include a default configuration
(the same configuration could have been used by placing the file in the
install directory, just like grub-install does for its customizations).
The assumption of directory structure is certainly wrong in the ubuntu
customization at least for the general case, but I'm not sure if the fix
for my situation is to fix the gcd file that gets generated, or to
change grub-install to use the non-customized version of the efi loader.

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1188364

Title:
  grub-install will install a misconfigured EFI image on removable media
  when /boot is also on the removable media

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1188364/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630748] Re: iwlagn degrades quickly during normal wifi session

2011-01-16 Thread Craig G
I've tested the experimental firmware (iwlwifi-5000-exp-8.83.5.1) with a
5300 card and kernel 2.6.36.2.  Initially it seems to have solved the
problem.  iwconfig reported bit rate maxes out at 300 Mb/s (though it
drops to 6 Mb/s during inactivity).  File transfer rates are
significantly greater than they were with N disabled.  There are quite a
few of the following messages in the syslog, but that may be expected
given the kernel debugging options necessary in order to run the
experimental firmware.

iwlagn :03:00.0: Aggregation not enabled for tid 0 because load = 1
iwlagn :03:00.0: iwlagn_tx_agg_start on ra = xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx tid = 0
iwlagn :03:00.0: Aggregation not enabled for tid 0 because load = 2
iwlagn :03:00.0: iwlagn_tx_agg_start on ra = xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx tid = 0
iwlagn :03:00.0: iwlagn_tx_agg_start on ra = xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx tid = 0

However, after about 10 minutes of inactivity, the connection becomes
inoperable.  Reloading the module fixes the problem temporarily, but it
hasn't held a connection for more than 15 minutes at a time.  This is
significantly longer than without the experimental firmware, but it
doesn't seem to have completely fixed the problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630748

Title:
  iwlagn degrades quickly during normal wifi session

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 630748] Re: iwlagn degrades quickly during normal wifi session

2011-01-16 Thread Craig G
Sorry, missed the upstream link above...
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16691#c82

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630748

Title:
  iwlagn degrades quickly during normal wifi session

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 517060] Re: hardy-lucid upgrade using linux-image-xen breaks systems running in PV mode under xen/xenserver

2010-03-09 Thread Craig G
I agree.  Ubuntu is def. the Linux distribution of choice for our
servers, and now that we have a XenServer setup it is a bit frustrating
that the later distributions of Ubuntu seem to be the only ones that
lack a simple a way to get it running paravirtualized under Xen.

-- 
hardy-lucid upgrade using linux-image-xen breaks systems running in PV mode 
under xen/xenserver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/517060
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 421530] [NEW] Cover art plungin - Amazon product advertising API now requires signature

2009-08-30 Thread Craig G
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: rhythmbox

Requests made by the cover art plugin are failing with HTTP response
code 400 and the following response:

?xml version=1.0?
ItemSearchErrorResponse 
xmlns=http://ecs.amazonaws.com/doc/2005-10-05/;ErrorCodeMissingParameter/CodeMessageThe
 request must contain the parameter 
Signature./Message/ErrorRequestID04dd4563-2250-4635-af70-cb27059ede36/RequestID/ItemSearchErrorResponse

The API has apparently changed to require a signature.  See
http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/ann.jspa?annID=476
http://apisigning.com/

The change happened about 2 weeks ago, but I couldn't find any Ubuntu
nor upstream bugs.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/rhythmbox
Package: rhythmbox 0.12.0-0ubuntu4
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: rhythmbox
Uname: Linux 2.6.30 i686

** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
Cover art plungin - Amazon product advertising API now requires signature
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421530
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 421530] Re: Cover art plungin - Amazon product advertising API now requires signature

2009-08-30 Thread Craig G

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31014439/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31014440/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31014441/ProcStatus.txt

-- 
Cover art plungin - Amazon product advertising API now requires signature
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421530
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs