[Bug 938751] Re: jpeg images are washed out or colors are skewed
I was wondering about this as well, but I figured that it doesn't seem to be a bug at all. The reason why it looks for some of you "correct" in Gimp is, because you don't have color management for your monitor enabled in the preferences (either set a specific monitor profile there, or tick the fallback option, which will make it use the color profile from the window manager). Thus, what Gimp is showing you all is the image without your monitor profile applied, while EOG always uses your monitor profile. So when the image in EOG looks dull to you, that's actually how it's supposed to look like. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938751 Title: jpeg images are washed out or colors are skewed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eog/+bug/938751/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942131] Re: Sometimes I have to select logout/shut down twice before it has effect
By now I kinda have the feeling that it's the fault of some program. Because when clicking shutdown, a few programs are closed, while other's stay open. Only after the second shutdown, all close. So one program is apparently not responding to the signal the first time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942131 Title: Sometimes I have to select logout/shut down twice before it has effect To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/942131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942131] Re: Sometimes I have to select logout/shut down twice before it has effect
Happens on Ubuntu GNOME 14.04 now as well since about a week. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942131 Title: Sometimes I have to select logout/shut down twice before it has effect To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/942131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292282] Re: background transparency is not working on gnome terminal
Will it be backported to LTS? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292282 Title: background transparency is not working on gnome terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1292282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1256373] Re: gnome-shell fullscreen windows are minimizing on lost focus
The Gnome team finally decided to roll that feature back, because it caused way too many problems. See last comment on their ticket and the resolution: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705177 I propose that this [bugfix] is backported to Ubuntu GNOME 14.04, as this was the first version affected by this. The relevant commit for this can be found here: https://git.gnome.org/browse/mutter/commit/?id=5d8ff2e34d36a72df2c14eea1bc4c265c3aab969 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256373 Title: gnome-shell fullscreen windows are minimizing on lost focus To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1256373/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292282] Re: background transparency is not working on gnome terminal
Tobias: That PPA sadly requires GnomeShell 3.12 actually, it won't work with vanilla installation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292282 Title: background transparency is not working on gnome terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/1292282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 892886] Re: ppa-purge is not multi-arch aware
Very good and clean solution by zarquon42 in #8, confirmed as working perfectly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/892886 Title: ppa-purge is not multi-arch aware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ppa-purge/+bug/892886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 867645] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
Actually, the bug I linked was a duplicate, here is the original one: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661323 If I interpret the comments correctly, this only affects Ubuntu users, but I could be wrong about that. ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #661323 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661323 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/867645 Title: gnome-shell crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/867645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 867645] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
This is most certainly an upstream bug, introduced in Gnome 3.2: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662805 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #662805 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662805 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/867645 Title: gnome-shell crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/867645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 743861] Re: System freezes using Unity on IBM Thinkpad Z60m
I can confirm this bug on MSI M670 (GeForce Go 6100), running Unity with the Nuveou drivers (experimental 3D, since Unity requires it). Haven't tested with Gnome Classic yet. Freezes occur after 30 to 60 minutes, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743861 Title: System freezes using Unity on IBM Thinkpad Z60m -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 713088] Re: [natty] plymouth boot screen corrupted with nouveau on Thinkpad T61
Same problem on MSI M670 (GeForce Go 6100). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713088 Title: [natty] plymouth boot screen corrupted with nouveau on Thinkpad T61 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 775016] Re: Graphical bug in gnome panel context menu
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of context menu" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775016/+attachment/2103731/+files/panel-bug.png ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-panel When right clicking on an applet in the gnome panel, like the shutdown applet for instance, the background in context menu looks screwed up. - Screenshot attached. + This didn't happen on Maverick but started on Natty. Screenshot + attached. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775016 Title: Graphical bug in gnome panel context menu -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 775016] [NEW] Graphical bug in gnome panel context menu
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel When right clicking on an applet in the gnome panel, like the shutdown applet for instance, the background in context menu looks screwed up. This didn't happen on Maverick but started on Natty. Screenshot attached. ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/775016 Title: Graphical bug in gnome panel context menu -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760814] Re: Compiz Very Slow and Choppy in Natty Classic
Same problem here, altho it doesn't happen at startup, but only when launching certain applications (for instance, PokerStars via Wine). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760814 Title: Compiz Very Slow and Choppy in Natty Classic -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652947] Re: Netbeans 6.9 package is missing netbeans.import
There is no netbeans.import there either. -- Netbeans 6.9 package is missing netbeans.import https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652947 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652947] Re: Netbeans 6.9 package is missing netbeans.import
Just to clarify: Yes, I already did an aptitude purge netbeans && aptitude install netbeans to be sure that it was no upgrade issue. -- Netbeans 6.9 package is missing netbeans.import https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652947 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652947] [NEW] Netbeans 6.9 package is missing netbeans.import
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: netbeans I upgraded to Maverick today, and had Netbeans 6.8 installed before. When I first started Netbeans 6.9, it asked me to import 6.8 config data. I confirmed that and got the message, that the file "/usr/share/netbeans/6.9/etc/netbeans.import" could not be found. I then copied that file from netbeans.org, which fixed the error message, but the import itself didn't work correctly (none of the settings were imported). ** Affects: netbeans (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Netbeans 6.9 package is missing netbeans.import https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652947 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 586121] [NEW] Unable to force workspace for contactlist or chat-window
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy Using empathy 2.30.1 on Ubuntu Lucid, I'm experiencing the following bug (which the code refers to as 'feature'): As I'm using multiple viewports, and empathy and another view applications are set to run at startup, I want those to spawn at certain workspaces in specific positions. This works fine for all applications except empathy. It automatically re-appears at the last position where you closed it and always on the current viewport, even tho the window manager (compiz) places it on a specific viewport on a certain position. The reason for this is the following: When you start empathy, the window manager (compiz) positions the window on viewport 4 at 1920x0 (in my case), any probably with a fixed size. Empathy calls the function "empathy_window_present" in "libempathy-gtk /empathy-ui-utils.c" when the contactlist or the chat-window spawns, which checks if the window is on the current viewport (which it isn't). In this case, it first tries to move it to the current viewport (which fails, since it can only move between workspaces). So then it hides the window and shows it agian, which makes it appear on the current workspace. Since it was reopned now, it grabs the position from the last known one, which is the one when you closed it last time manually. This behaviour renders fixed positioning useless. According to the code, it is a wanted behaviour, sine a user would always expect that the contactlist opens on the current viewport. I agree with that in so far, that if it was not already opened, it opens there, but if it is already open, and moved by the window manager, it should not try to re-open itself in the current viewport. ** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Unable to force workspace for contactlist or chat-window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586121 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572580] Re: Video Playback in lucid stuttering
There seem to be many users by the way experiencing this problem: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1471262 Apparently, for some the tsched=0 worked, for another guy it was fixed with kernel 2.6.34. -- Video Playback in lucid stuttering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572580] Re: Video Playback in lucid stuttering
By the way, today I found the proof that it is definetly Pulseaudio's fault: MPD usually uses ALSA by default. I tried to switch the output device to Pulseaudio, and immediently got stuttering when playing music. Switching back to ALSA solved it there. I wonder if I can just remove/disable Pulseaudio completly without loosing any functionallity? -- Video Playback in lucid stuttering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577727] Re: Ubuntu 10.04 sound lag with enemy territory quake wars
Confirming here as well, seems to be related with my bug, where I have the same audio delay: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/572580 -- Ubuntu 10.04 sound lag with enemy territory quake wars https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572580] Re: Video Playback in lucid stuttering
Is there any update on this issue? Today I even noticed the sound delay in QuakeLive after a fresh restart without watching videos, and a bunchload of errors in /var/log/messages repeated for a hundred times: pulseaudio[2107]: ratelimit.c: 12 events suppressed -- Video Playback in lucid stuttering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569723] Re: Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB
This bug seems to be fixed in Lucid and can be closed. -- Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574069] Re: [Lucid] Loading nvidia-settings hurts compiz performance
I cannot confirm that Compiz needs long to load. Since I needed to start certain applications after Compiz, I wrote a script for that, and the applications called in it start about 0.5-1 second after the panels. I have also moved the nvidia-settings line in it now: http://www.dasprids.de/blog/2010/05/01/start-applications-delayed-after- compiz -- [Lucid] Loading nvidia-settings hurts compiz performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574069 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500077] Re: k10temp: there is no support for k10-thermal-sensors in kernel 2.6.32
I've also put up a k10temp ppa some time ago: https://launchpad.net/~dasprid/+archive/dasprid -- k10temp: there is no support for k10-thermal-sensors in kernel 2.6.32 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500077 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 575463] [NEW] When encrypting the home directory, /tmp nor /var/tmp is encrypted
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Currently when you tell ubuntu to encrypt your home directory, it also encrypts the swap via dmcrypt. While this is the right approach, /tmp nor /var/tmp are encrypted, which can left senisble data in those directories written by user applications. Ubuntu should also take care to encrypt those directories. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Visibility changed to: Public -- When encrypting the home directory, /tmp nor /var/tmp is encrypted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572580] Re: Video Playback in lucid stuttering
After another reboot, I have sound again, but the videos still hang, together with the sound stuttering: http://www.alsa- project.org/db/?f=1f3e3815451d56c0b706a8aa959f3ea793d9e668 -- Video Playback in lucid stuttering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572580] Re: Video Playback in lucid stuttering
I tried to install it, but that PPA also updated most pulseaudio packages. Now I don't have any sound, running "pulseaudio -vv" gives me the following error messages: I: (alsa-lib)conf.c: function snd_func_refer returned error: No such file or directory I: (alsa-lib)conf.c: Evaluate error: No such file or directory I: (alsa-lib)pcm.c: Unknown PCM hdmi:1 I: alsa-util.c: Error opening PCM device hdmi:1: No such file or directory D: alsa-mixer.c: Looking at profile output:hdmi-stereo+input:iec958-surround-40 D: alsa-mixer.c: Checking for playback on Digital Stereo (HDMI) (hdmi-stereo) D: alsa-util.c: Trying hdmi:1 with SND_PCM_NO_AUTO_FORMAT ... I: (alsa-lib)confmisc.c: Unable to find definition 'cards.USB-Audio.pcm.hdmi.0:CARD=1,AES0=4,AES1=130,AES2=0,AES3=2' I: (alsa-lib)conf.c: function snd_func_refer returned error: No such file or directory I: (alsa-lib)pcm_hw.c: SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_HW_PARAMS failed -- Video Playback in lucid stuttering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572580] Re: Video Playback in lucid stuttering
Nope, no difference then. -- Video Playback in lucid stuttering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572580] Re: Video Playback in lucid stuttering
I didn't notice any yet at least (using mpd). -- Video Playback in lucid stuttering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572580] Re: Video Playback in lucid stuttering
In the video? Yes, as I wrote. In QuakeLive? As I said, there's this 1-2 second audio delay (and sometimes it misses to play some sounds). -- Video Playback in lucid stuttering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572580] Re: Video Playback in lucid stuttering
I just spotted another symptom which may help to find the source of the problem if it is related. After playing a video, I started QuakeLive and the sound in there was delayed by about 1 or 2 seconds. After killing pulseaudio, the audio delay was gone. Killing pulseaudio did not solve the problem with the video stuttering, but I assume that this bug is related to pulseaudio now. ** Package changed: ubuntu => pulseaudio (Ubuntu) -- Video Playback in lucid stuttering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572580] [NEW] Video Playback in lucid stuttering
Public bug reported: I reinstalled (not upgraded) from Karmic to Lucid yesterday, and I have serious issues now when trying to playback videos. I tried several players, including Totem, Mplayer and VLC, and all of them show the same symptoms. When playing a video, every minute or so the video hangs for half a second and the audio stutters, then the playback resumes until the next hang. So much about the symptoms. When looking at "top", I also saw that the CPU usage of of Xorg and compiz raises from 5%/5% to about 20%/20%. I surely already tried to disable compiz, but that didn't solve the problem. When looking at various logfiles, I also recognized the following error message repeating in /var/log/messages, but it those messages did not appear in sync with the stuttering: pulseaudio[2049]: ratelimit.c: 2 events suppressed I am using the NVidia binary driver by the way, running a GeForce GTX 240, if that is in any way relevant. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Video Playback in lucid stuttering https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569723] Re: Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB
This is Karmic, there is still a bug in the Lucid installer which holds me from installing it. -- Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569723] Re: Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB
** Attachment added: "screenshot1.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45544699/screenshot1.png -- Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569727] Re: Drives mounted via PAM_mount still show up as drives to mount
I don't have udisks installed nor do I find the package for it, is it still required? But here is the gvfs-mount log. -- Drives mounted via PAM_mount still show up as drives to mount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569727] Re: Drives mounted via PAM_mount still show up as drives to mount
** Attachment added: "gvfs-mount.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45539723/gvfs-mount.log -- Drives mounted via PAM_mount still show up as drives to mount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569727] [NEW] Drives mounted via PAM_mount still show up as drives to mount
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I have a hardware RAID array (encrypted via DM-Crypt) which is mounted via PAM_mount on login. It is listed under the Places tho and can be mounted again there, which would result in the same partition mounted twice. The "mount" command gives the following output, which should hint nautilus that the drive is already mounted: /dev/sdh1 on /mnt/data type crypt (noatime,nodiratime) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Drives mounted via PAM_mount still show up as drives to mount https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 569723] [NEW] Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I have a 12 TB hardware RAID array, which shows up in nautilus and the "places" menu as 12002 GB drive. IMHO the next higher unit (TB) should be used instead when a drive exceeds 1024 GB. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Drives with a size greater than 1024 GB are still displayed with GB instead of TB https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 542210] Re: /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer)
Here are syslog and partman log attached. I have also screencasted how I'm exatly creating the raid: http://stuff.dasprids.de/videos/raid-creation.avi -- /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 542210] Re: /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer)
** Attachment added: "partman" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45116820/partman -- /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 542210] Re: /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer)
** Attachment added: "syslog" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45116758/syslog -- /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 542210] Re: /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer)
Confirming that the bug is still present in Release Candidate, I assume you are not going to fix that for release? Will be pretty bad if nobody will be able to install Lucid in a RAID configuration. -- /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 542210] Re: /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer)
Confirming that the bug is still present in Beta 2. -- /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 542210] Re: /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer)
I have the same problem (Ubuntu Lucid Beta 1, alternate installer). I created two RAID1 partitions on two disks, one for boot and one for LVM. Then I formatted the boot RAID parition with ext3. After setting up LVM was done and I completed the parition creation, the installer popped up the following error: "The attempt to mount a file system with type ext3 in RAID1 device #0 at /boot failed." -- /boot destroyed during install even when formatting disabled (alternate installer) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542210 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522295] Re: [needs-packaging] Include PHP 5.3 in Lucid
PHP 5.3.1 is in lucid, I think this bug can be closed? http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/php5 -- [needs-packaging] Include PHP 5.3 in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 522295] Re: [needs-packaging] Include PHP 5.3 in Lucid
Sure we could have php5.2 and php5.3 packages, but if PHP 5.3 doesn't get included at all, this will hold back wide 5.3 development at least another 6 months. -- [needs-packaging] Include PHP 5.3 in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 308566] [NEW] Systray on secondary X-session doesn't work
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel I have three monitors here, two powered by a large desktop via TwinView and a third one running a separate X-session. This X-session has it's own panel with a systray in it, but when I start programs like Pidgin and others, which usually place icons in the systray, they don't appear there. This works actually fine, when I start the programs on the main X-session (then they appear in the main systray). There are no error messages regarding this in the xsession-errors file, so I don't have any further information. Release: Ubuntu Intrepid Gnome-Panel: 1:2.24.1-0ubuntu2.1 ** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Systray on secondary X-session doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308566 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80433] Re: System tray Icon plugin for Gaim dosen't work on 2nd X screen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 103146 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103146 I can confirm the bug here on Ubuntu Intrepid with Pidgin 2.5.2. I have three monitors, the two right ones connected via twinview, and the left one using a separate screen. I have pidgin running on the left screen, but there it doesn't show up in the systray. When I run it on the main twinview-screen, it appears there in the systray. ** Also affects: pidgin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- System tray Icon plugin for Gaim dosen't work on 2nd X screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80433 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178400] Re: [Hardy] Xorg high CPU usage with 2.6.24 kernel and nvidia-glx
I tested that UseEvents before, but it didn't fix stuff. -- [Hardy] Xorg high CPU usage with 2.6.24 kernel and nvidia-glx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 178400] Re: [Hardy] Xorg high CPU usage with 2.6.24 kernel and nvidia-glx
I can confirm this as well. AMD Phenom 9500, Geforce 8800GT, 2GB Ram and one of the core is at 100% when I start moving 2D-Stuff around (like cards in Freecell Solitair). Moving windows and icons is no problem, maybe because they are accelerated by compiz via the GFX card. This bug is really disturbing, have to disable Compiz currently. -- [Hardy] Xorg high CPU usage with 2.6.24 kernel and nvidia-glx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
