[Bug 1940993] [NEW] package tex-common 6.09 failed to install/upgrade: installed tex-common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-08-24 Thread Dale Harris
Public bug reported:

I was just upgrading from 16 LTS to 18 LTS to 20 LTS and this popped up.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: tex-common 6.09
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-154.161-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-154-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.24
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Aug 24 12:49:22 2021
ErrorMessage: installed tex-common package post-installation script subprocess 
returned error exit status 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-13 (2749 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 
(20130820.1)
PackageArchitecture: all
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.9, python3-minimal, 3.6.7-1~18.04
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.17, python-minimal, 2.7.15~rc1-1
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.3
 apt  1.6.14
SourcePackage: tex-common
Title: package tex-common 6.09 failed to install/upgrade: installed tex-common 
package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2021-08-24 (0 days ago)

** Affects: tex-common (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package bionic third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940993

Title:
  package tex-common 6.09 failed to install/upgrade: installed tex-
  common package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tex-common/+bug/1940993/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1695557] [NEW] emacs failed during upgrade

2017-06-02 Thread Dale Harris
Public bug reported:

Setting up emacs24 (24.5+1-6ubuntu1) ...
Install emacsen-common for emacs24
emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs24
emacs24: relocation error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_system.so.1.58.0: 
symbol _ZNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEED1Ev, version 
GLIBCXX_3.4.21 not defined in file libstdc++.so.6 with link time reference
ERROR: install script from emacsen-common package failed
dpkg: error processing package emacs24 (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of emacs:
 emacs depends on emacs24 | emacs24-lucid | emacs24-nox; however:
  Package emacs24 is not configured yet.
  Package emacs24-lucid is not installed.
  Package emacs24-nox is not installed.

dpkg: error processing package emacs (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 emacs24
 emacs

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "gzip'ed tar of /var/log/dist-upgrade/"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695557/+attachment/4888123/+files/dist-upgrade.tar.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695557

Title:
  emacs failed during upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1695557/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1442674] Re: sysstat log corruption, time isn't changing

2015-08-19 Thread Dale Harris
Oh okay, I didn't know about -L being hard coded in there, missed
that.  I just ended up making sure the two cron jobs won't conflict
with each other, which is why I was saying it was a configuration
error on my part.

I did have:

*/5 * * * * root command -v debian-sa1 > /dev/null && debian-sa1 -L 1 1
59 23 * * * root command -v debian-sa1 > /dev/null && debian-sa1 -L 60 2

But I've gone to:

2-58/2 * * * * root command -v debian-sa1 > /dev/null && debian-sa1 -L 1 1
59 23 * * * root command -v debian-sa1 > /dev/null && debian-sa1 -L 60 2

I'm pretty sure the two were conflicting. I haven't seen any problems
since making that change.

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Bill Cole
 wrote:
> Note that the "-L" flag is hardcoded in the sa1 calls of sadc, so
> whatever locking that does is not fixing the issue. Seems like a
> possible upstream bug?
>
> I've had this issue in sysstat data files generated on machines ( n=9
> out of 48 sa?? files from 3 different machines) where the sysstat
> resolution has been changed to every 2 minutes by changing this line in
> /etc/cron.d/sysstat:
>
>  5-55/10 * * * * root command -v debian-sa1 > /dev/null && debian-
> sa1 1 1
>
> To:
>
> */2 * * * * root command -v debian-sa1 > /dev/null && debian-sa1 1 1
>
> I've been able to salvage the files by looking for repeating binary
> patterns to figure out the size and offsets of sadc records, finding the
> one which is a runt, and rebuilding the file by splicing together the
> sections before and after it, making sure the resulting file is
> identical in size to the other full-day files that are parseable. This
> is not an easily documented process, as it requires eyeballing hexdump
> output and making educated guesses, but there are useful tips:
>
> 1. With "-S XALL" in SADC_OPTIONS, each record is 8-9KB, and for some reason 
> they seem to alternate between 2 sizes (!) 16 bytes different, e.g. 8528 
> bytes & 8544 bytes.
> 2. There is a header in the file between 850-900 bytes, so a good place to 
> start looking for patterns at the end of records (useful!) is ~9K.
> 3. EVERY time I've had this problem, the 2nd record has been a runt, 500-1500 
> bytes shorter than the normal records.
>
> Because excising the runt record yields what seems to be a perfectly
> good file, my guess is that the root cause is collision between the
> 23:59 run and the 00:00 run, with the sadc -L flag for some reason
> failing to do its job.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442674
>
> Title:
>   sysstat log corruption, time isn't changing
>
> Status in sysstat package in Ubuntu:
>   Invalid
>
> Bug description:
>   I'm seeing some log file corruption in sysstat, the time stamp
>   occasionally just stops changing. So the output I typically see is
>   like:
>
>
>   # sar
>
>   12:00:00 AM all  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  
> 0.00
>   12:00:00 AM all  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  
> 0.00
>   12:00:00 AM all  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  0.00  
> 0.00
>   End of system activity file unexpected
>
>   Typical output should be something like:
>
>   11:58:01 PM all  0.11  0.00  0.02  0.00  0.00 
> 99.87
>   11:59:01 PM all  0.06  0.00  0.02  0.00  0.00 
> 99.92
>   12:00:01 AM all  0.03  0.00  0.02  0.00  0.00 
> 99.95
>   Average:all  0.10  0.00  0.04  0.00  0.00 
> 99.86
>
>
>   I'm attaching some example logs files, sa09 is good, sa10 is corrupted.
>
>   ProblemType: Bug
>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
>   Package: sysstat 10.2.0-1
>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-46.77-generic 3.13.11-ckt15
>   Uname: Linux 3.13.0-46-generic x86_64
>   ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.8
>   Architecture: amd64
>   Date: Fri Apr 10 14:44:10 2015
>   SourcePackage: sysstat
>   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
>   mtime.conffile..etc.cron.d.sysstat: 2015-03-25T18:44:29.274292
>   mtime.conffile..etc.sysstat.sysstat: 2015-03-25T18:44:29.198292
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysstat/+bug/1442674/+subscriptions


-- 
Dale Harris
rod...@maybe.org
rod...@gmail.com
/.-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442674

Title:
  sysstat log corruption, time isn't changing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysstat/+bug/1442674/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1442674] Re: sysstat log corruption, time isn't changing

2015-08-11 Thread Dale Harris
Yeah, I think is mostly a misconfiguration on my part. You can't overlap
the execution of those two crontab lines without having problems, even
with the -L flag. I saw some weirdness even with the file locking in
place on some of my systems.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442674

Title:
  sysstat log corruption, time isn't changing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysstat/+bug/1442674/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1442674] Re: sysstat log corruption, time isn't changing

2015-08-10 Thread Dale Harris
I finally noticed that sadc has optional file locking with the -L flag,
so I suspect that will likely fix my problems.  Just going to add -L to
the debian-sa1 lines in the /etc/cron.d/sysstat.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442674

Title:
  sysstat log corruption, time isn't changing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysstat/+bug/1442674/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1103044] Re: outdated version of nodejs (ubuntu 12.04 / 12.10 / 13.04 / 14.04 /14.10/15.04)

2015-06-15 Thread Dale Harris
Latest stable nodejs version is 0.12.4, seems like it would be better to
aim for that in 14.04 LTS and later.  But obviously Debian hasn't
upgraded anything from upstream in a long time, either.  I guess I'll
just use the PPA.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103044

Title:
  outdated version of nodejs (ubuntu 12.04 / 12.10 / 13.04 / 14.04
  /14.10/15.04)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nodejs/+bug/1103044/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1442674] Re: sysstat log corruption, time isn't changing

2015-04-21 Thread Dale Harris
This continues to happen, I did increase the interval of the "debian-sa1
1 1" line in /etc/cron.d/sysstat to */5, but this problem still pops up
occasionally.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442674

Title:
  sysstat log corruption, time isn't changing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysstat/+bug/1442674/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1346646] Re: init-functions: status_of_proc has incorrect call to pidofproc

2014-07-21 Thread Dale Harris
Nevermind this is in error, I just noticed the:

if [ -n "$pidfile" ]; then
pidfile="-p $pidfile"
fi

bit in there.

So there is no bug.  You can close this, if I can't.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346646

Title:
  init-functions: status_of_proc has incorrect call to pidofproc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/1346646/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1346646] Re: init-functions: status_of_proc has incorrect call to pidofproc

2014-07-21 Thread Dale Harris
I removed "A proposed patch", it was bad.

** Patch removed: "A proposed patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/1346646/+attachment/4159596/+files/init-functions.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346646

Title:
  init-functions: status_of_proc has incorrect call to pidofproc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/1346646/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1346646] Re: init-functions: status_of_proc has incorrect call to pidofproc

2014-07-21 Thread Dale Harris
I had a copy paste error with that patch. Adding another.

** Patch added: "init-functions.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/1346646/+attachment/4159603/+files/init-functions.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346646

Title:
  init-functions: status_of_proc has incorrect call to pidofproc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/1346646/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1346646] [NEW] init-functions: status_of_proc has incorrect call to pidofproc

2014-07-21 Thread Dale Harris
Public bug reported:

Description:Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS
Release:12.04

lsb-base:
  Installed: 4.0-0ubuntu20.3
  Candidate: 4.0-0ubuntu20.3
  Version table:
 *** 4.0-0ubuntu20.3 0
500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 4.0-0ubuntu20 0
500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages


Appears that the status_of_proc() function in /lib/lsb/init-functions 
incorrectly calls pidofproc.  pidofproc requires a -p switch to specify a 
pidfile.

** Affects: lsb (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Patch added: "A proposed patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346646/+attachment/4159596/+files/init-functions.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1346646

Title:
  init-functions: status_of_proc has incorrect call to pidofproc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/1346646/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1333368] [NEW] man page for rtpproxy is not up to date

2014-06-23 Thread Dale Harris
Public bug reported:

The current man page packaged with rtpproxy doesn't document several of
the features available.  In particular -m and -M, not mentioned at all
in the man page.


I'm going to attach the man page from  http://www.rtpproxy.org/

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: rtpproxy 1.2.1-1.1 [modified: usr/share/man/man8/rtpproxy.8.gz]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Jun 23 10:32:43 2014
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 
(20120424.1)
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=screen
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: rtpproxy
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: rtpproxy (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

** Attachment added: "man page from http://www.rtpproxy.org/";
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/168/+attachment/4137622/+files/rtpproxy.8

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/168

Title:
  man page for rtpproxy is not up to date

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rtpproxy/+bug/168/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs