[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-08 Thread Dan Muresan
Super, I was just looking for a way to build kernels in a Docker
container.

Maybe the Docker image could be modified to build dwarves for itself at
some point.

I think you can request more space for a PPA from launchpad.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926938

Title:
  Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal
  20.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1926938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-08 Thread Dan Muresan
Still seeing this spurious libc 2.33 dependency (I *assume* it's not the
kernel people who decide to change their libc policy in the middle of a
release series -- so it's spurious) in 5.10.35.

Are the Ubuntu / Canonical people notified? I'm not sure who takes care
of this "Mainline PPA" (which doesn't seem to have a Launchpad presence,
but just a website with build products).

Is there anyone to CC on Launchpad, so that we may get some more or less
official answer?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926938

Title:
  Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal
  20.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1926938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-06 Thread Dan Muresan
It would be unfortunate for the "LTS" kernel version to not be
installable on LTS Ubuntu.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926938

Title:
  Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal
  20.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1926938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 631088] Re: Incompatibilty with Windows font Deja Vu Sans 9.9990234375 makes evince menu unreadable

2015-05-22 Thread Dan Muresan
Still not working in 14.04. Strangely, using strace -eopen evince I
can see that an open() system call returns  EACCES, even though from the
shell I can access the symlink (and its target)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631088

Title:
  Incompatibilty with Windows font Deja Vu Sans 9.9990234375 makes
  evince menu unreadable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/631088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 631088] Re: Incompatibilty with Windows font Deja Vu Sans 9.9990234375 makes evince menu unreadable

2015-05-22 Thread Dan Muresan
Aha, it's Teh Apparmor. Edit /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.evince and add

/**.[tT][tT][fF] rw,

after the other supported formats (bmp, djvu etc)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631088

Title:
  Incompatibilty with Windows font Deja Vu Sans 9.9990234375 makes
  evince menu unreadable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/631088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1396048] Re: Evince misses font and only displays squares in menus

2015-05-22 Thread Dan Muresan
For me it seems to happen with symlinks from /usr/share/fonts to a
different partition

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396048

Title:
  Evince misses font and only displays squares in menus

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1396048/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1443213] Re: Data corruption with msgpack = 0.4.5, = 0.4.2 -- upgrade to 0.4.6

2015-04-27 Thread Dan Muresan
Also, https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-python/issues/97 and apparently
https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-python/issues/101

The original report refers to 124, which only affects the pure python
implementation.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443213

Title:
  Data corruption with msgpack = 0.4.5, = 0.4.2 -- upgrade to 0.4.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msgpack-python/+bug/1443213/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1443213] Re: Data corruption with msgpack = 0.4.5, = 0.4.2 -- upgrade to 0.4.6

2015-04-14 Thread Dan Muresan
Also, https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-python/issues/114 (fixed in
0.4.3)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443213

Title:
  Data corruption with msgpack = 0.4.5, = 0.4.2 -- upgrade to 0.4.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msgpack-python/+bug/1443213/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1443213] [NEW] Data corruption with msgpack = 0.4.5, = 0.4.2 -- upgrade to 0.4.6

2015-04-12 Thread Dan Muresan
Public bug reported:

Please upgrade to 0.4.6 to avoid data corruption:
https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-python/issues/124

Utopic also needs the upgrade.

** Affects: msgpack-python (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: upgrade-software-version vivid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to msgpack-python in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443213

Title:
  Data corruption with msgpack = 0.4.5, = 0.4.2 -- upgrade to 0.4.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msgpack-python/+bug/1443213/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1443213] [NEW] Data corruption with msgpack = 0.4.5, = 0.4.2 -- upgrade to 0.4.6

2015-04-12 Thread Dan Muresan
Public bug reported:

Please upgrade to 0.4.6 to avoid data corruption:
https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-python/issues/124

Utopic also needs the upgrade.

** Affects: msgpack-python (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: upgrade-software-version vivid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1443213

Title:
  Data corruption with msgpack = 0.4.5, = 0.4.2 -- upgrade to 0.4.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msgpack-python/+bug/1443213/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1411757] Re: update to latest msgpack-python release

2015-04-12 Thread Dan Muresan
Update to 0.4.6, because 0.4.2 (the current Vivid version) to 0.4.5 have
DATA CORRUPION bugs: https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-
python/issues/124

** Tags added: vivid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411757

Title:
  update to latest msgpack-python release

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msgpack-python/+bug/1411757/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1245474] Re: [regression] on login screen, monitor stays on forever

2015-03-28 Thread Dan Muresan
This seems to have been fixed in unity-greeter, but not lightdm-gtk-
greeter. And in any case, how can the unity-greeter inactivity timeout
be tuned? gsettings under the lightdm account?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1245474

Title:
  [regression] on login screen, monitor stays on forever

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-power-consumption/+bug/1245474/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1253155] Re: Failure to validate module signature at boot time

2015-03-20 Thread Dan Muresan
I'm seeing this with linux-lowlatency-lts-utopic...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1253155

Title:
  Failure to validate module signature at boot time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1253155/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1253155] Re: Failure to validate module signature at boot time

2015-03-20 Thread Dan Muresan
Sorry, this is on Trusty amd64, with linux-lowlatency-lts-utopic
3.16.0.31.24

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1253155

Title:
  Failure to validate module signature at boot time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1253155/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1129409] Re: Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc.

2015-03-15 Thread Dan Muresan
The vivd package *still* doesn't provide opencl-icd, so after installing
fglrx, python-pyopencl tries to pull in beignet...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409

Title:
  Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide
  libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1129409/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1129409] Re: Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc.

2015-03-11 Thread Dan Muresan
Trusty was affected too by the Conflicts: thing; I've been running
manually-patched fglrx drivers for a while now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409

Title:
  Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide
  libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1129409/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1129409] Re: Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc.

2015-02-25 Thread Dan Muresan
This is... nightmarish. @nukedathlonman, why don't you state clearly
which package needs to be compiled and what needs to be modified in
debian/control?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409

Title:
  Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide
  libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1129409/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 682604] Re: Plymouth hangs after successful resume from from hibernation with uswsusp

2014-07-19 Thread Dan Muresan
With encrypted resume it's even worse, because you can't enter the
passphrase since plymouth hogs the screen and keyboard. 'plymouth quit'
as in #11 indeed solves the problem. CAN SOMEONE PATH uswsusp PLEASE?

Also, it seems uswsusp is really old and unsupported; is it possible to
get compressed, encrypted hibernation without uswsusp (i.e. with pm-
utils using the kernel method)?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682604

Title:
  Plymouth hangs after successful resume from from hibernation with
  uswsusp

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/682604/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574773] Re: Cannot make directory '/var/run/screen': Permission denied (convert init to upstart)

2014-05-18 Thread Dan Muresan
Still a problem on Trusty (!), fixed with /etc/init.d/screen-cleanup start.
screen == 4.1.0~20120320gitdb59704-9

It seems screen-cleanup is not activated by default in rc.d

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to screen in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574773

Title:
  Cannot make directory '/var/run/screen': Permission denied (convert
  init to upstart)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/screen/+bug/574773/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 574773] Re: Cannot make directory '/var/run/screen': Permission denied (convert init to upstart)

2014-05-18 Thread Dan Muresan
Still a problem on Trusty (!), fixed with /etc/init.d/screen-cleanup start.
screen == 4.1.0~20120320gitdb59704-9

It seems screen-cleanup is not activated by default in rc.d

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574773

Title:
  Cannot make directory '/var/run/screen': Permission denied (convert
  init to upstart)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/screen/+bug/574773/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1315898] Re: Light-Locker not working in Lubuntu 14.04

2014-05-14 Thread Dan Muresan
I can't get light-locker to do anything at all. No matter how long my
laptop sits unused, there is no blanking of the screen and no locking.
This is on a vanilla Lubuntu 14.04 install (and ps confirms light-locker
is running)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315898

Title:
  Light-Locker not working in Lubuntu 14.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-locker/+bug/1315898/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 513644] Re: Does not log fsck invocations in /var/log/fsck/

2013-12-02 Thread Dan Muresan
Even on MS Windows you can dig out fsck messages with the eventviewer.
This is stupid, lazy and arrogant.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513644

Title:
  Does not log fsck invocations in /var/log/fsck/

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/513644/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 992068] Re: [needs-packaging] broken in 12.04 and 12.10: libtorsocks: many symbols not found

2013-10-24 Thread Dan Muresan
I've backported a 1.3-3 from saucy (!) in my PPA
(https://launchpad.net/~danmbox/+archive/ppa). I still get a bunch of
junk:

13:31:17 libtorsocks(28806): WARNING: The symbol res_query() was not found in 
any shared library with the reported error: Not Found!
  Also, we failed to find the symbol __res_query() with the reported error: Not 
Found
13:31:17 libtorsocks(28806): WARNING: The symbol res_search() was not found in 
any shared library with the reported error: Not Found!
  Also, we failed to find the symbol __res_search() with the reported error: 
Not Found
13:31:17 libtorsocks(28806): WARNING: The symbol res_send() was not found in 
any shared library with the reported error: Not Found!
  Also, we failed to find the symbol __res_send() with the reported error: Not 
Found
13:31:17 libtorsocks(28806): WARNING: The symbol res_querydomain() was not 
found in any shared library with the reported error: Not Found!
  Also, we failed to find the symbol __res_querydomain() with the reported 
error: Not Found

that makes stderr unreadable. This is kind of important, because the
only way to get rid of the junk is to redirect stderr, but in that case
you lose all errors. Is this the same bug?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992068

Title:
  [needs-packaging] broken in 12.04 and 12.10: libtorsocks: many symbols
  not found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/torsocks/+bug/992068/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 763457] Re: please provide opencl-icd virtual package

2013-10-23 Thread Dan Muresan
In my PPA (https://launchpad.net/~danmbox/+archive/ppa) I've tried
backporting ocl-icd_2.0.2-1ubuntu1 (after backporting khronos-opencl-
headers), but it's not compilable (weird warnings-turned-into-errors)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/763457

Title:
  please provide opencl-icd virtual package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/763457/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1243683] [NEW] can't change Build-Depends: line (debuild -S reverts changes)

2013-10-23 Thread Dan Muresan
Public bug reported:

When modifying the build-depends line in debian/control for
http://packages.ubuntu.com/saucy/nvidia-319-updates, any changes are
reverted by debuild -S. How did you manage to accomplish this amazingly
useful effect?

** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-319-updates (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243683

Title:
  can't change Build-Depends: line (debuild -S reverts changes)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-319-updates/+bug/1243683/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1243690] [NEW] Build-depend on xserver-xorg-dev-lts-raring and similar

2013-10-23 Thread Dan Muresan
Public bug reported:

Since I installed xserver-xorg-dev-lts-raring, I can't build some
packages that insist on depending on xserver-xorg-dev. And due to a
separate bug I can't change the Build-Depends: line, because debuild -S
reverts my changes. I don't know how you accomplished that. But you
should build-depend on xserver-xorg-dev (= 2:1.4) | xserver-xorg-dev-
lts-raring (= 2:1.4) | xserver-xorg-dev-lts-quantal (= 2:1.4),

** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-319-updates (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243690

Title:
  Build-depend on xserver-xorg-dev-lts-raring and similar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-319-updates/+bug/1243690/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1244023] [NEW] pycuda 2012.1-1ubuntu2~ubuntu12.04.1 depends on nvidia-current

2013-10-23 Thread Dan Muresan
Public bug reported:

You don't have to depend on nvidia-current just to ensure nvidia. Some
people have nvidia-319, nvidia-319-updates etc.

** Affects: pycuda (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244023

Title:
  pycuda 2012.1-1ubuntu2~ubuntu12.04.1 depends on nvidia-current

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pycuda/+bug/1244023/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1186786] Re: nvidia-173 kernel module fails to build on kernels = 3.10.x [error: implicit declaration of function ‘create_proc_entry’]

2013-10-22 Thread Dan Muresan
Is anybody backporting (or at least THINKING about backporting) all
these wonderful changes for us plebs on 12.04 LTS using the OFFICIAL
linux-generic-lts-raring series, or do we no longer count as real users,
despite LTS promises from Ubuntu?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186786

Title:
  nvidia-173 kernel module fails to build on kernels = 3.10.x [error:
  implicit declaration of function ‘create_proc_entry’]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-173/+bug/1186786/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 17962] Re: newly opened gnome-terminal windows don't have .bash_profile sourced

2013-10-16 Thread Dan Muresan
That was absolute bull. Ubuntu obviously ships with /etc/profile, which
is a version of bash_profile, so #8 was a specious argument. And
placing profiley stuff into bashrc slows down the shell (as if it's
not slow enough already!)

Some .xsessionrc file (or whatever is read by the *dm's) must make sure
to read /etc/profile. If that is not done at the system level it must be
recommended to users as the preferred workaround for this utter
nonsense.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17962

Title:
  newly opened gnome-terminal windows don't have .bash_profile sourced

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/17962/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1215513] Re: System locks up, requires hard reset

2013-09-23 Thread Dan Muresan
Brad, can you comment on the problems I've shown for 3.2 and 3.8 on
precise -lts kernels? Do you want to push through those kernels and then
have to deal with separate bugs. I know there's a lot of noise in this
thread, but there were some relevant tests and errors.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215513

Title:
  System locks up, requires hard reset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1215513/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1215513] Re: System locks up, requires hard reset

2013-09-22 Thread Dan Muresan
With 3.8.0-31-lowlatency, try this if you're willing to reboot:

rmmod zram; modprobe zram; echo -n 6710  /sys/block/zram0/disksize;
mkswap /dev/zram0; dmesg -T | tail

It will bring you into a state where you can't rmmod zram (!).

# rmmod zram
ERROR: Removing 'zram': Device or resource busy

I see in dmesg:

BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6364652d

I tried 6710 (16k+) after determining that with 67108864 I still get
Buffer I/O error on device zram0 at exactly the last zram0 block.

This is a pretty serious problem. It looks like zram-related code is
quite unstable. I'm not even sure if it's been fixed on the kernel
mainline. A simple backport will probably not solve issues.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215513

Title:
  System locks up, requires hard reset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1215513/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1215513] Re: System locks up, requires hard reset

2013-09-22 Thread Dan Muresan
@Kenneth Parker: if your problem is that zram shows up EVEN AFTER dpkg
--purge zram-config, please **file a separate bug**. Note that service
zram-config stop stops zram after the system is up, which means it has
already potentially damaged your system. What you want is for the zram
module to never be modprobe'd at all. There is a blacklist solution in
Bug #1217189, comment 45 that seems to work for me.

[ On an unrelated note, thank you for sharing so much relevant
information about your job, your skills and so on with us. ]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215513

Title:
  System locks up, requires hard reset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1215513/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1228882] [NEW] nvidactl (misspelled) in /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/multimedia all Ubuntu versions

2013-09-22 Thread Dan Muresan
Public bug reported:

/etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/multimedia mis-spells an
nvidia device:

  # If we allow the above, nvidia based systems will also need these
  /dev/nvidactl rw,
  /dev/nvidia0 rw,

(should of course be nvidiactl). This seems to be the case in all
apparmor versions.

I don't know if this affects anything. I can't watch Youtube videos in
Firefox, and my fix doesn't improve the situation (there are probably
other bugs)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: apparmor 2.7.102-0ubuntu3.9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-31.23-lowlatency 3.8.13.8
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-31-lowlatency i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.4
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Sep 22 18:37:58 2013
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=rxvt
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-31-lowlatency 
root=UUID=a7047dd8-61aa-4cbe-b36d-697a5e7ee64b ro
SourcePackage: apparmor
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
mtime.conffile..etc.apparmor.d.abstractions.ubuntu.browsers.d.multimedia: 
2013-09-22T18:16:06.208483

** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1228882

Title:
  nvidactl (misspelled) in /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-
  browsers.d/multimedia all Ubuntu versions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1228882/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 893835] Re: ubuntu-bug fails with /usr/bin/xdg-open: 364: /usr/bin/xdg-open: gnome-open: not found

2013-09-22 Thread Dan Muresan
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 893056 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893056

This fails whenever $BROWSER can't be opened (e.g. when you set up the
system-wide BROWSER to chromium-browser then uninstall chromium). This
is not a good thing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893835

Title:
  ubuntu-bug fails with /usr/bin/xdg-open: 364: /usr/bin/xdg-open:
  gnome-open: not found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/893835/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 893056] Re: on livecd xdg-open failed with: /usr/bin/xdg-open: 364: /usr/bin/xdg-open: gnome-open: not found

2013-09-22 Thread Dan Muresan
Bug #893835 was incorrectly (in my opinion) marked as a duplicate of
this. The problem in that case is that ubuntu-bug fails if the system-
wide $BROWSER no longer exists. People in that situation cannot report
bugs anymore.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893056

Title:
  on livecd xdg-open failed with: /usr/bin/xdg-open: 364: /usr/bin/xdg-
  open: gnome-open: not found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/893056/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1228882] Re: nvidactl (misspelled) in /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers.d/multimedia all Ubuntu versions

2013-09-22 Thread Dan Muresan
@dino99, do you also have problems with flash or firefox?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1228882

Title:
  nvidactl (misspelled) in /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-
  browsers.d/multimedia all Ubuntu versions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1228882/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1215513] Re: System locks up, requires hard reset

2013-09-22 Thread Dan Muresan
I've tested 3.8.0-31-generic (linux-image-3.8.0-31-generic =
3.8.0-31.46~precise1). To the admins: when asking us to test the latest
in -proposed, please tell us which package and which version. It makes
it easier to interpret the record in the future, when the latest in
proposed may be different (or when your proposed solution has been
removed / replaced)

I'm using the following test now:

echo '4096 * 4096' | bc -l  /sys/block/zram0/disksize
mkfs.ext2 /dev/zram0

And I get this with dmesg -T:

[Sun Sep 22 23:05:40 2013] Buffer I/O error on device zram0, logical block 4095
[Sun Sep 22 23:05:40 2013] lost page write due to I/O error on zram0
[Sun Sep 22 23:05:40 2013] Buffer I/O error on device zram0, logical block 4095

I don't think this is a good kernel. In the terminology of
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/13/22, both [1] and [2] should be in the
kernel, so that both bug A and bug B are fixed.

I'll check how to find the changelog for a kernel and whether the other
-proposed (3.2, 3.5) kernels also have the same problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215513

Title:
  System locks up, requires hard reset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1215513/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1215513] Re: System locks up, requires hard reset

2013-09-22 Thread Dan Muresan
With linux-image-3.5.0-41-generic = 3.5.0-41.64~precise1 there are no
Buffer I/O errors, either with mkswap or mkfs.ext2

With linux-image-3.2.0-54-generic = 3.2.0-54.82 the errors are the same
as in linux-image-3.8.0-31-generic = 3.8.0-31.46~precise1

So the lts-quantal image is good, the others are not.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215513

Title:
  System locks up, requires hard reset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1215513/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1215513] Re: System locks up, requires hard reset

2013-09-17 Thread Dan Muresan
Since several bugs with much more details were merged into this one, the
most likely early warning of zram problems are messages like

Buffer I/O error on device zram0, logical block 257912 [repeated X
times]

You get those right after modprobing / formatting zram. If you don't see
those with the new kernel, either things are in good shape or the bugfix
didn't work.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215513

Title:
  System locks up, requires hard reset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1215513/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1215513] Re: System locks up, requires hard reset

2013-09-17 Thread Dan Muresan
Kenneth, zram-config is a red herring. Even if you purge it completely
and set up zram manually,

modprobe zram
echo -n 67108864  /sys/block/zram/size
mkswap /dev/zram0
swapon /dev/zram0

You still get the error messages and eventually the lock-ups. This is
not a script problem, it's a kernel problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215513

Title:
  System locks up, requires hard reset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1215513/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1215513] Re: System locks up, requires hard reset

2013-09-16 Thread Dan Muresan
A week seems like an extremely short time, especially for ALL releases.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215513

Title:
  System locks up, requires hard reset

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1215513/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] AlsaDevices.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3812988/+files/AlsaDevices.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] BootDmesg.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3812991/+files/BootDmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3812994/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3812993/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] AplayDevices.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: AplayDevices.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3812989/+files/AplayDevices.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Card0.Amixer.values.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3812992/+files/Card0.Amixer.values.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] ArecordDevices.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: ArecordDevices.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3812990/+files/ArecordDevices.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] CurrentDmesg.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3812996/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Re: Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine lockup)

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected staging

** Description changed:

  This is on linux-image-generic-lts-raring (which I recently upgraded to
  3.8.0-29; the problem didn't occur before upgrading AFAIR)
  
  I see this junk in my dmesg when creating / formatting a zram swap, and
  then periodically. Then at some point after heavy swapping incidents,
  the machine locks up. Correlation does not imply causation, but it does
  waggle its eyebrows suggestively and all that.
  
  ---
  
  zram: module is from the staging directory, the quality is unknown, you have 
been warned.
  zram: num_devices not specified. Using default: 1
  zram: Creating 1 devices
  Adding 1031648k swap on /dev/zram0.  Priority:100 extents:1 across:1031648k SS
  ...
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0, logical block 257912 [repeated 10 times]
  ...
  BUG: scheduling while atomic: rsyslogd/1439/0x0001
  Pid: 1439, comm: rsyslogd Tainted: PF   WC O 3.8.0-29-generic 
#42~precise1-Ubuntu
  [20931.796635] Pid: 1439, comm: rsyslogd Tainted: PF   WC O 
3.8.0-29-generic #42~precise1-Ubuntu
  [20931.796638] Call Trace:
  [20931.796649]  [c1619449] __schedule_bug+0x52/0x5e
  [20931.796653]  [c162c265] __schedule+0x575/0x5f0
  [20931.796660]  [f8439e06] ? zram_make_request+0xe6/0x100 [zram]
  [20931.79]  [c111c38d] ? release_pages+0x18d/0x1c0
  [20931.796669]  [c162c573] schedule+0x23/0x60
  [20931.796673]  [c162d0fd] rwsem_down_failed_common+0x9d/0xf0
  [20931.796677]  [c162d162] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x12/0x20
  [20931.796681]  [c12f809a] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x6/0x8
  [20931.796685]  [c162ba44] ? down_write+0x24/0x30
  [20931.796689]  [f8439169] zram_slot_free_notify+0x29/0x50 [zram]
  [20931.796693]  [f8439140] ? zram_stat64_inc+0x30/0x30 [zram]
  [20931.796700]  [c11460bc] swap_entry_free+0xdc/0x170
  [20931.796703]  [c162d100] ? rwsem_down_failed_common+0xa0/0xf0
  [20931.796708]  [c1146458] swap_free+0x28/0x40
  [20931.796712]  [c1134ba0] do_swap_page+0x390/0x6f0
  [20931.796717]  [c10180f8] ? sched_clock+0x8/0x10
  [20931.796721]  [c11365aa] handle_pte_fault+0x21a/0x2b0
  [20931.796726]  [c10451e1] ? kmap_atomic_prot+0xf1/0x120
  [20931.796730]  [c113746a] handle_mm_fault+0x1fa/0x2d0
  [20931.796735]  [c1630ad0] __do_page_fault+0x190/0x4f0
  [20931.796740]  [c12f63bc] ? sprintf+0x1c/0x20
  [20931.796744]  [c104c132] ? print_time.part.4+0x82/0xc0
  [20931.796748]  [c1630e30] ? __do_page_fault+0x4f0/0x4f0
  [20931.796752]  [c1630e3d] do_page_fault+0xd/0x10
  [20931.796756]  [c162dc17] error_code+0x67/0x6c
  [20931.796759]  [c12f8716] ? __copy_to_user_ll+0x46/0x70
  [20931.796763]  [c12f8970] copy_to_user+0x40/0x60
  [20931.796767]  [c104e218] syslog_print+0xc8/0x210
  [20931.796770]  [c104eae6] do_syslog+0x206/0x390
  [20931.796775]  [c106d570] ? add_wait_queue+0x50/0x50
  [20931.796780]  [c11c3680] ? kmsg_poll+0x50/0x50
  [20931.796784]  [c11c36d0] kmsg_read+0x50/0x60
  [20931.796788]  [c11b6584] proc_reg_read+0x64/0xa0
  [20931.796793]  [c116469c] vfs_read+0x8c/0x160
  [20931.796797]  [c10a898d] ? sys_futex+0xed/0x130
  [20931.796801]  [c11b6520] ? proc_reg_write+0xa0/0xa0
  [20931.796805]  [c11647b7] sys_read+0x47/0x80
  ...
  [30855.181542] Write-error on swap-device (251:0:131064)
  [43457.030155] Write-error on swap-device (251:0:131064)
  [43705.090381] Buffer I/O error on device zram0, logical block 16383
  
  Anyway, there's a couple of lkml messages related to this Buffer I/O
  error on device zram0, please investigate
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  Package: linux-image-3.8.0-29-generic 3.8.0-29.42~precise1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-29.42~precise1-generic 3.8.13.5
  Uname: Linux 3.8.0-29-generic i686
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.4
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Tue Aug 27 07:33:37 2013
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  MarkForUpload: True
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=rxvt
   LC_COLLATE=C
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: linux-lts-raring
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ --- 
+ AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 
k3.8.0-29-lowlatency.
+ ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.4
+ Architecture: i386
+ AudioDevicesInUse:
+  USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
+  /dev/snd/controlC0:  muresan   29305 F pulseaudio
+  /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p:   muresan   29305 F...m pulseaudio
+  /dev/snd/controlC1:  muresan   29305 F pulseaudio
+ CRDA: Error: command ['iw', 'reg', 'get'] failed with exit code 1: nl80211 
not found.
+ Card0.Amixer.info:
+  Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xfebfc000 irq 44'
+Mixer name : 'SigmaTel STAC9205'
+Components : 'HDA:838476a0,102801f1,00100204 
HDA:14f12c06,14f1000f,0010'
+Controls  : 26
+Simple ctrls  : 12
+ Card1.Amixer.info:
+  Card hw:1 'USB'/'E-MU Systems, Inc. E-MU 0202 | USB at usb-:00:1d.0-2, 
full speed'
+Mixer name : 'USB Mixer'
+Components : 'USB041e:3f02'
+Controls  : 4
+ 

[Bug 1217189] ProcInterrupts.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3813001/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] ProcModules.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3813002/+files/ProcModules.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Card1.Amixer.values.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: Card1.Amixer.values.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3812995/+files/Card1.Amixer.values.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] PciMultimedia.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3812999/+files/PciMultimedia.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] UdevDb.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3813004/+files/UdevDb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3813000/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Lspci.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3812997/+files/Lspci.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Lsusb.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3812998/+files/Lsusb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] PulseList.txt

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
apport information

** Attachment added: PulseList.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189/+attachment/3813003/+files/PulseList.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Re: Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine lockup)

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
This bug also occurs on linux-lts-quantal, I think (I remember booting
to a lts-quantal kernel after seeing the raring bug). There was a
backport to zram on both branches that is causing this.

Note that in Bug #1218278, Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) wrote at #19: There
will be a linux-lts-saucy shortly after 13.10 is released.; anyway, I'm
marking that one as a duplicate.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1218278] Re: When creating a swap device using zram I get Buffer I/O errors

2013-09-10 Thread Dan Muresan
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1217189 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

I'm marking this as a duplicate of bug #1217189. I don't find @timg-
tpi's comment very reassuring. This is a critical bug for the LTS
release.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1217189
   Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine lockup)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218278

Title:
  When creating a swap device using zram I get Buffer I/O errors

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1218278/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Re: Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine lockup)

2013-09-09 Thread Dan Muresan
@damian-sawicki: yes, but once such memory errors DO occur, I think your
system is basically compromised; you don't know when it will crash (*)
and you don't know what else gets corrupted before the lock-up (why not
filesystem errors, security etc?). That's why I would cut this at the
root.

(*) In practice, of course, the system seems to actually crash when
under heavy swapping the erroneous block gets used (possibly when the
page is swapped back into memory?) But this is like overclocking, you
never know what parts of the system might break.

We need to figure out why there aren't more people affected by this
issue and how to get developers involved. Perhaps we should mark this as
a security problem (because memory errors usually DO lead to security
problems, even if writing an exploit could be hard)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-raring/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1218278] Re: When creating a swap device using zram I get Buffer I/O errors

2013-09-09 Thread Dan Muresan
This might explain the reasons

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/13/22

(assuming this was a change backported to 3.8 and 3.5 by Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218278

Title:
  When creating a swap device using zram I get Buffer I/O errors

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1218278/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1218278] Re: When creating a swap device using zram I get Buffer I/O errors

2013-09-09 Thread Dan Muresan
@timg-tpi: Have you seen bug #1217189, involving machine lock-ups due to
this error, probably triggered after heavy swapping?

Do you have any suggestions as to why regular raring users seem
unaffected by this bug (or at least they're not complaining)?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218278

Title:
  When creating a swap device using zram I get Buffer I/O errors

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1218278/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Re: Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine lockup)

2013-09-08 Thread Dan Muresan
The way to list your swaps is swapon -s. If zram0 is listed,  something
still enables it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-raring/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Re: Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine lockup)

2013-09-06 Thread Dan Muresan
@damian-sawicki: a lot of people have zram due to the zram-config
package, which you must remove with dpkg --purge zram-config (otherwise
it won't go away completely). But in my case zram *still* starts up, and
I can't track what sets it up. I think the easy solution is to break the
zram modules (e.g. rename zram.ko to zram.ko.save in the appropriate
/lib/modules directory)

Of course, it would be great to get working zram again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-raring/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1218278] Re: When creating a swap device using zram I get Buffer I/O errors

2013-09-06 Thread Dan Muresan
Changed to Confirmed as per @jsalisbury's instructions, since
@konrad.hofer forgot to. In any case, I doubt raring (and thus linux-
lts-raring on precise) will upgrade to 3.11.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218278

Title:
  When creating a swap device using zram I get Buffer I/O errors

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1218278/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Re: Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine lockup)

2013-09-06 Thread Dan Muresan
Bug #1218278 might be a duplicate (though it doesn't talk about lock-
ups). Apparently this is fixed in 3.11, though I don't see how this
helps with raring and linux-lts-raring.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-raring/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1218278] Re: When creating a swap device using zram I get Buffer I/O errors

2013-09-06 Thread Dan Muresan
might be related to bug #1217189 which raises the possibility of hard
machine LOCK-UPS due to zram errors. I've had several such lock-ups on
precise after the most recent linux-lts-raring updates (and none before
that) that seemed to go away after disabling zram.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218278

Title:
  When creating a swap device using zram I get Buffer I/O errors

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1218278/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Re: Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine lockup)

2013-09-05 Thread Dan Muresan
@damian-sawicki: do you also get lock-ups?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-raring/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] Re: Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine lockup)

2013-08-30 Thread Dan Muresan
@variona So, no lock-ups after downgrading? You should also test the
NEWER kernel WITHOUT enabling zram and see if the crashes still occur.
I've run 3.8.0-29 WITHOUT zram for almost a day (not quite enough to
give it a clean pass)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-raring/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1217189] [NEW] Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine lockup)

2013-08-26 Thread Dan Muresan
Public bug reported:

This is on linux-image-generic-lts-raring (which I recently upgraded to
3.8.0-29; the problem didn't occur before upgrading AFAIR)

I see this junk in my dmesg when creating / formatting a zram swap, and
then periodically. Then at some point after heavy swapping incidents,
the machine locks up. Correlation does not imply causation, but it does
waggle its eyebrows suggestively and all that.

---

zram: module is from the staging directory, the quality is unknown, you have 
been warned.
zram: num_devices not specified. Using default: 1
zram: Creating 1 devices
Adding 1031648k swap on /dev/zram0.  Priority:100 extents:1 across:1031648k SS
...
Buffer I/O error on device zram0, logical block 257912 [repeated 10 times]
...
BUG: scheduling while atomic: rsyslogd/1439/0x0001
Pid: 1439, comm: rsyslogd Tainted: PF   WC O 3.8.0-29-generic 
#42~precise1-Ubuntu
[20931.796635] Pid: 1439, comm: rsyslogd Tainted: PF   WC O 
3.8.0-29-generic #42~precise1-Ubuntu
[20931.796638] Call Trace:
[20931.796649]  [c1619449] __schedule_bug+0x52/0x5e
[20931.796653]  [c162c265] __schedule+0x575/0x5f0
[20931.796660]  [f8439e06] ? zram_make_request+0xe6/0x100 [zram]
[20931.79]  [c111c38d] ? release_pages+0x18d/0x1c0
[20931.796669]  [c162c573] schedule+0x23/0x60
[20931.796673]  [c162d0fd] rwsem_down_failed_common+0x9d/0xf0
[20931.796677]  [c162d162] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x12/0x20
[20931.796681]  [c12f809a] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x6/0x8
[20931.796685]  [c162ba44] ? down_write+0x24/0x30
[20931.796689]  [f8439169] zram_slot_free_notify+0x29/0x50 [zram]
[20931.796693]  [f8439140] ? zram_stat64_inc+0x30/0x30 [zram]
[20931.796700]  [c11460bc] swap_entry_free+0xdc/0x170
[20931.796703]  [c162d100] ? rwsem_down_failed_common+0xa0/0xf0
[20931.796708]  [c1146458] swap_free+0x28/0x40
[20931.796712]  [c1134ba0] do_swap_page+0x390/0x6f0
[20931.796717]  [c10180f8] ? sched_clock+0x8/0x10
[20931.796721]  [c11365aa] handle_pte_fault+0x21a/0x2b0
[20931.796726]  [c10451e1] ? kmap_atomic_prot+0xf1/0x120
[20931.796730]  [c113746a] handle_mm_fault+0x1fa/0x2d0
[20931.796735]  [c1630ad0] __do_page_fault+0x190/0x4f0
[20931.796740]  [c12f63bc] ? sprintf+0x1c/0x20
[20931.796744]  [c104c132] ? print_time.part.4+0x82/0xc0
[20931.796748]  [c1630e30] ? __do_page_fault+0x4f0/0x4f0
[20931.796752]  [c1630e3d] do_page_fault+0xd/0x10
[20931.796756]  [c162dc17] error_code+0x67/0x6c
[20931.796759]  [c12f8716] ? __copy_to_user_ll+0x46/0x70
[20931.796763]  [c12f8970] copy_to_user+0x40/0x60
[20931.796767]  [c104e218] syslog_print+0xc8/0x210
[20931.796770]  [c104eae6] do_syslog+0x206/0x390
[20931.796775]  [c106d570] ? add_wait_queue+0x50/0x50
[20931.796780]  [c11c3680] ? kmsg_poll+0x50/0x50
[20931.796784]  [c11c36d0] kmsg_read+0x50/0x60
[20931.796788]  [c11b6584] proc_reg_read+0x64/0xa0
[20931.796793]  [c116469c] vfs_read+0x8c/0x160
[20931.796797]  [c10a898d] ? sys_futex+0xed/0x130
[20931.796801]  [c11b6520] ? proc_reg_write+0xa0/0xa0
[20931.796805]  [c11647b7] sys_read+0x47/0x80
...
[30855.181542] Write-error on swap-device (251:0:131064)
[43457.030155] Write-error on swap-device (251:0:131064)
[43705.090381] Buffer I/O error on device zram0, logical block 16383

Anyway, there's a couple of lkml messages related to this Buffer I/O
error on device zram0, please investigate

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: linux-image-3.8.0-29-generic 3.8.0-29.42~precise1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-29.42~precise1-generic 3.8.13.5
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-29-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.4
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Aug 27 07:33:37 2013
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=rxvt
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: linux-lts-raring
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: linux-lts-raring (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1217189

Title:
  Buffer I/O error on device zram0 (possibly causing complete machine
  lockup)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-raring/+bug/1217189/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1087915] Re: Can't combine -o permissions with -o uid=UUU, gid=GGG

2012-12-08 Thread Dan Muresan
id; touch newfile; stat newfile

OK, you are right -o permissions alone accurately preserves owners and
permissions, which is sort of what I needed. I was confused by some
experiments I did with memory sticks accessed from Windows.

Yes, that should be expected. You cannot both define the owner of a
file both as the current user and a forced user. See
http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-advanced/ownership-and-
permissions/#options

Ownership and permission are orthogonal settings. You could force
ownership while leaving permissions alone.

This would be useful when working with memory sticks that are accessed
both in Windows and Linux (because sometimes directories created in
Windows will appear owned by root and unwritable).

The permissions/conditions table is actually quite confusing. It's
trying to represent a decision tree. I don't have better suggestions
though, other than switching the column order, i.e. Condition first,
Results second.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087915

Title:
  Can't combine -o permissions with -o uid=UUU,gid=GGG

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntfs-3g/+bug/1087915/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1087915] [NEW] Can't combine -o permissions with -o uid=UUU, gid=GGG

2012-12-07 Thread Dan Muresan
Public bug reported:

At the moment, it seems that mount.ntfs-3g disables -o permissions if -o
uid=UUU and/or uid=GGG are also specified. This (combined with Ubuntu's
compilation options disallowing user mounts for NTFS-3g) prevents
unprivileged users from easily accessing NTFS systems while preserving
standard Unix permissions.

root# mount -o uid=500,gid=500,umask=000 /dev/sdb1 /vol/exthd/
root# touch /vol/exthd/x
root# ls -al /vol/exthd/x
-rwxrwxrwx 1 muresan muresan 0 Dec 8 00:29 /vol/exthd/x
root# chmod u-x /vol/exthd/x
root# ls -al /vol/exthd/x
-rwxrwxrwx 1 muresan muresan 0 Dec 8 00:29 /vol/exthd/x

So chmod is ignored and all permissions are fixed to rwx.

With mount -o permissions, permissions ARE preserved, but all files
are owned by root:

root# mount -o permissions /dev/sdb1 /vol/exthd
Using default user mapping
root# touch /vol/exthd/x
root# ls -al /vol/exthd/x
-rw--w--w- 1 root root 0 Dec 8 00:29 /vol/exthd/x
root# chmod u+x /vol/exthd/x
root# ls -al /vol/exthd/x
-rwx-w--w- 1 root root 0 Dec 8 00:29 /vol/exthd/x
root# rm /vol/exthd/x

root# ls -al /bin/bash
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 920788 Apr 3 2012 /bin/bash
root# cp -a /bin/bash /vol/exthd/
root# ls -al /vol/exthd/bash
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 920788 Apr 3 2012 /vol/exthd/bash
root# umount /vol/exthd

Trying to mount the filesystem as an unprivileged user results in:

Either mount the volume as root, or rebuild NTFS-3G with integrated
FUSE support and make it setuid root. Please see more information at
http://tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-faq/#unprivileged

** Affects: ntfs-3g (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087915

Title:
  Can't combine -o permissions with -o uid=UUU,gid=GGG

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntfs-3g/+bug/1087915/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1087915] Re: Can't combine -o permissions with -o uid=UUU, gid=GGG

2012-12-07 Thread Dan Muresan
Note, my shell log shows the behavior with mount -o
uid=500,gid=500,umask=000. The same behavior (chmod has no effect)
occurs when using mount -o permissions,uid=500,gid=500,umask=000 (as if
-o permissions is being silently ignored).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087915

Title:
  Can't combine -o permissions with -o uid=UUU,gid=GGG

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntfs-3g/+bug/1087915/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 515915] Re: evince hangs on start-up

2012-03-22 Thread Dan Muresan
The only way I can get out of this bug, when it bites, is to exit my X
(and presumably dbus) session and log back in. Really annoying. evince
prints all sorts of useless console clutter, but fails to print any
useful diagnostics in this case.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515915

Title:
  evince hangs on start-up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/515915/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367671] Re: PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

2011-07-11 Thread Dan Muresan
Run

uname -a

on the command line and post the results. You're probably not running a
real-time kernel, because those stopped at around 2.6.33. But log the
results here anyway.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367671

Title:
  PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-rt/+bug/367671/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367671] Re: PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

2011-07-11 Thread Dan Muresan
@David (#36): are you running a RT kernel though? PA tends to get killed
for many other reasons, being the stable piece of software that it is...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367671

Title:
  PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-rt/+bug/367671/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 726471] Re: dbus de-prioritizes XDG_DATA_HOME -- can't customize user session

2011-05-20 Thread Dan Muresan
... which is only a dream at this point :)

I guess I should request a backport to my installed version?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726471

Title:
  dbus de-prioritizes XDG_DATA_HOME -- can't customize user session

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 665185] Re: /etc/init.d/sendsigs fails to kill some processes

2011-05-16 Thread Dan Muresan
There are other bugs in Ubuntu that can cause shutdown problems, for
example Bug #665195 and bug #665176.

I fixed my problems by creating a /etc/init.d/sysshutdown as attached
(and adding it to the various runlevels). This at least gives you a
chance to examine the situation (in Virtual Console 9) and do a Alt +
Sysrq + RSEIUB if need be. This, or something similar, should be
included in distributions, since improper shutdown is dangerous. Sysrq
can be simulated by writing to /proc/sysrq-trigger. Ubuntu should at
least force-remount read-only (via sysrq) before doing its customary
improper shutdowns.

** Attachment added: sysshutdown script
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/665185/+attachment/2130969/+files/sysshutdown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665185

Title:
  /etc/init.d/sendsigs fails to kill some processes

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 665185] Re: /etc/init.d/sendsigs fails to kill some processes

2011-05-16 Thread Dan Muresan
Then please ignore my previous comment and file a separate bug. This bug
is about unclean shutdowns, while yours sounds like the machine hangs on
shutdown -- a different symptom.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665185

Title:
  /etc/init.d/sendsigs fails to kill some processes

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 726471] Re: dbus de-prioritizes XDG_DATA_HOME -- can't customize user session

2011-05-05 Thread Dan Muresan
I wonder why this bug is marked as Fix Released? Upstream has indeed
fixed the problem, but on a different branch (dbus 1.4.8). Ubuntu has
1.4.6 and AFAICT the fix hasn't been backported.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726471

Title:
  dbus de-prioritizes XDG_DATA_HOME -- can't customize user session

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 726471] Re: dbus de-prioritizes XDG_DATA_HOME -- can't customize user session

2011-05-05 Thread Dan Muresan
Thanks, I missed the second status line.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726471

Title:
  dbus de-prioritizes XDG_DATA_HOME -- can't customize user session

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367671] Re: PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

2011-04-27 Thread Dan Muresan
It's an interrupted syscall -- there is no result... And the for loop
only repeats on EINTR.

I take it that no support, or at least help, will be forthcoming from
the Ubuntu side?

Even though the lead PA developer seems like a smart guy who understands
real-time quite well, I'm sorry to say that PA is a stability and
usability nightmare, and it has always been so. See the myriad of guides
on removing PA from Ubuntu installs.

I think the problem is that PA developers put a low priority on making
the software just work for the user. They are, however, quite happy to
explain what the right thing is, how to contact the non-responsive
ALSA developers, how to invest hours upon hours debugging Pulse etc.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367671

Title:
  PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367671] Re: PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

2011-04-26 Thread Dan Muresan
Thanks David. I am streaming from qmmp, and I have completely removed
gstreamer0.10-pulseaudio (and, yes, as per comment #25, I have a
backported natty pulseaudio).

I have performed the steps I planned in #28 and have obtained several
backtraces. They all look the same. Strangely, the kernel sends SIGXCPU
(due to real-time CPU usage reaching the soft RLIMIT_RTTIME) in a
write() call. The setrlimit(2) man page says that blocking calls reset
the RTTIME count.

#0  0x0012d422 in ?? ()
#1  0x00475edb in write () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:82
#2  0x00153a55 in pa_fdsem_post (f=0x806e178) at pulsecore/fdsem.c:205
#3  0x0013cb0f in push (l=0x8071bc8, p=0x8, wait_op=false) at 
pulsecore/asyncq.c:161
#4  0x0013d291 in pa_asyncq_post (l=0x8071bc8, p=0x807a620) at 
pulsecore/asyncq.c:203
#5  0x0013c1ee in pa_asyncmsgq_post (a=0x8071a90, object=0x80b3ac8, code=7, 
userdata=0x0, 
offset=0, chunk=0xb570, free_cb=0) at pulsecore/asyncmsgq.c:139
#6  0x009811d7 in pstream_memblock_callback (p=0x80864d8, channel=0, offset=0, 
seek=PA_SEEK_RELATIVE, chunk=0xb570, userdata=0x8092228)
at pulsecore/protocol-native.c:4445
#7  0x001dd20b in ?? () from /usr/lib/libpulsecommon-0.9.22.so
#8  0x001c823e in ?? () from /usr/lib/libpulsecommon-0.9.22.so
#9  0x0021b5fb in pa_mainloop_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libpulse.so.0
#10 0x0021bb11 in pa_mainloop_iterate () from /usr/lib/libpulse.so.0
#11 0x0021bbd4 in pa_mainloop_run () from /usr/lib/libpulse.so.0
#12 0x08052e85 in main (argc=1, argv=0xb834) at daemon/main.c:974

Patch attached.

** Patch added: soft RLIMIT_RTTIME lower than hard limit
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-rt/+bug/367671/+attachment/2090565/+files/0230-rlimit-rttime-soft-limit.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367671

Title:
  PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367671] Re: PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

2011-04-26 Thread Dan Muresan
From setrlimit(2): setrlimit allows the user to specify two limits -- a
soft one and a hard one. For RLIMIT_RTTIME, upon exceeding the soft
limit, the kernel sends a SIGXCPU every second, then a SIGKILL.

Unfortunately, pulseaudio sets the soft limit equal to the hard limit,
so no warning is possible.

I'm going to change the code to make the soft limit smaller, then run
pulse under gdb and get a backtrace when it receives SIGXCPU.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367671

Title:
  PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367671] Re: PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

2011-04-23 Thread Dan Muresan
Bug #496616 is marked as a duplicate of bug #644644...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367671

Title:
  PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367671] Re: PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

2011-04-23 Thread Dan Muresan
This is hard to diagnose. I built 0.9.22 packages from natty, then
installed pulseaudio-dbg_0.9.22+stable-queue-24-g67d18-0ubuntu3_i386.deb

In ~/.pulse/daemon.conf, I enabled
log-level = debug
log-meta = yes
log-time = yes
log-backtrace = 1

then ran pulseaudio under gdb with

$ killall pulseaudio; rm ~/.pulse-cookie; gdb --args pulseaudio --log-
target=stderr

[...]

(1533.966|  36.781) D: [modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c:1496 thread_func()] Wakeup 
from ALSA! (libpulsecommon-0.9.22.so(pa_log_levelv_meta+0x5e9) [0x1cda59])
(1572.048|  38.082) D: [modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c:1496 thread_func()] Wakeup 
from ALSA! (libpulsecommon-0.9.22.so(pa_log_levelv_meta+0x5e9) [0x1cda59])
[Thread 0xb7355b70 (LWP 24417) exited]
[Thread 0xb7b68b70 (LWP 24416) exited]

Program terminated with signal SIGKILL, Killed.

So, it's impossible to tell what's happening.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367671

Title:
  PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 367671] Re: PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

2011-04-23 Thread Dan Muresan
Doesn't the log-level = debug take care of that, Daniel?

I didn't attach a full log because minutes pass between the last printed
message and the SIGKILL.

Is there a way to see how much rttime a task has been using (with ps
or something else)?

And (less likely) is there a way to configure the kernel to send
something like SIGUSR1 instead of SIGKILL and/or log the action and its
cause?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367671

Title:
  PulseAudio gets killed mysteriously on RT kernels

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 762929] [NEW] wmdrawer hangs when killed, segfaults when killed again

2011-04-16 Thread Dan Muresan
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: wmdrawer

$ wmdrawer 
$ killall wmdrawer
# wmdrawer doesn't go away, but doesn't bring up the drawer either anymore
$ killall wmdrawer
Bye bye, thx to use wmdrawer
[1]+  Segmentation fault  wmdrawer

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: wmdrawer 0.10.5-1.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.154-rt
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-rt i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Apr 16 20:19:10 2011
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: wmdrawer

** Affects: wmdrawer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762929

Title:
  wmdrawer hangs when killed, segfaults when killed again

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 762929] Re: wmdrawer hangs when killed, segfaults when killed again

2011-04-16 Thread Dan Muresan
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762929

Title:
  wmdrawer hangs when killed, segfaults when killed again

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 270479] Re: Debian/Ubuntu netpbm is many years out-of-date with upstream

2011-04-12 Thread Dan Muresan
As the comments in the Debian bug report show, Fedora 14 is packaging
netpbm-10.47.17, so presumably the license problems invoked by Debian
aren't that bad.

The Debian maintainer has quite clearly decided to kill this package. He
hasn't posted updates in the bug report for almost 4 years. Is there
something we can do about inactive Debian maintainers? Alternatively,
who's in charge of the Ubuntu package?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270479

Title:
  Debian/Ubuntu netpbm is many years out-of-date with upstream

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 482533] Re: acroread does not become the default PDF handler for email even after answering Yes to the debconf question

2011-04-12 Thread Dan Muresan
** Summary changed:

- Karmic acroread does not become the default PDF handler for email even after 
answering Yes to the debconf question
+ acroread does not become the default PDF handler for email even after 
answering Yes to the debconf question

** Tags added: lucid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482533

Title:
  acroread does not become the default PDF handler for email even after
  answering Yes to the debconf question

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 730506] Re: patchage missing build-depend on dbus-glib

2011-04-12 Thread Dan Muresan
Trivial patch added, since there seems to be no response to the original
report. Please apply or at least comment on the issue.

** Patch added: depend on libdbus-glib-1-dev (debdiff)
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/patchage/+bug/730506/+attachment/2025152/+files/patchage-depend-on-libdus-glib-1-dev.debdiff.diff

** Tags added: maverick natty patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730506

Title:
  patchage missing build-depend on dbus-glib

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 665176] Re: svscan (the upstart job) doesn't stop on shutdown

2011-04-11 Thread Dan Muresan
If you're seeing data corruption due to shutdown, see also this bug:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+source/sysvinit/+bug/665185

(again there is a fixed version in my PPA, and Ubuntu will also soon
provide a Lucid update)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665176

Title:
  svscan (the upstart job) doesn't stop on shutdown

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 673119] Re: dash set -e breaks trap action INT

2011-04-11 Thread Dan Muresan
I have reported this bug upstream and it has been confirmed.

http://www.mail-archive.com/dash@vger.kernel.org/msg00401.html

Apparently dash 0.5.6 fixes it, but releases up to Natty still use 0.5.5


** Tags added: maverick natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673119

Title:
  dash set -e breaks trap action INT

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 726471] Re: dbus de-prioritizes XDG_DATA_HOME -- can't customize user session

2011-04-09 Thread Dan Muresan
The bug obviously affects Maverick and Natty as well. It has been fixed
in GIT and will be in 1.4.8:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35569

I hope this fix will be backported to 1.4.6 (on freedesktop.org and/or
here), because it would be quite annoying to have to deal with buggy
Ubuntus for years to come now.

** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #35569
   http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35569

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726471

Title:
  dbus de-prioritizes XDG_DATA_HOME -- can't customize user session

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 665176] Re: svscan (the upstart job) doesn't stop on shutdown

2011-04-09 Thread Dan Muresan
I have a fixed version in my PPA,

https://launchpad.net/~danmbox/+archive/ppa/

Attaching debdiff against that version. This is a trivial change, but
from what I can see Ubuntu is very selectively maintained, and providing
a patch makes it slightly more likely that a maintainer will act.

Again, please note that this bug breaks shutdown, leading to unclean
filesystems, fsck and thus possibly an increased chance of data
corruption.

** Patch added: debdiff - fix svscan.conf
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/daemontools/+bug/665176/+attachment/2006563/+files/daemontools-svscan.conf-debdiff.diff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665176

Title:
  svscan (the upstart job) doesn't stop on shutdown

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 665185] Re: /etc/init.d/sendsigs fails to kill some processes

2011-04-03 Thread Dan Muresan
Great, thanks. Now what do I have to do to get this fix into Lucid,
where it actually *is* a problem (killall5 doesn't overflow on Natty,
because it's been fixed, but it does on Lucid)?

The LTS release still has years left of support, but I'm really getting
the all-around feeling that it is shunned, ignored, and being treated as
legacy software.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665185

Title:
  /etc/init.d/sendsigs fails to kill some processes

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 742964] [NEW] shift-click ctrl-click not working

2011-03-26 Thread Dan Muresan
Public bug reported:

In xtightvncviewer shift-click and ctrl-click behave as normal clicks,
making it impossible to select multiple items. Server is tightvnc, and
can be on a windows or on a linux host with the same result.

Easiest to reproduce by running a tightvncserver, then connecting to it
with 'xtightvncviewer localhost:1'

Maverick and Natty seem to have the same tightvnc version so presumably
both are affected

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: xtightvncviewer 1.3.9-6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-11.154-rt
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-11-rt i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Mar 26 08:34:04 2011
ProcEnviron:
 LC_COLLATE=C
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: tightvnc

** Affects: tightvnc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742964

Title:
  shift-click  ctrl-click not working

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   >