[Bug 2053125] Re: Tracking 5.27 Plasma Bugs

2024-03-13 Thread Daniel Gibson
Two bugs just got reopened, because I could reproduce them on current KUbuntu 
24.04.
Both affect the plasma-workspace Battery Monitor and Brightness settings 
thingie:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471010 Battery Monitor shows wrong
remaining time (even though PowerDevil sends the correct one through
DBus)

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475255 "Energy Profile" slider
jumps back to "Save Energy" mode, even though other profile is set (and
again, despite PowerDevil sending the correct power profile through DBus
- both bugs *might* have the same cause?)

** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #471010
   https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471010

** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #475255
   https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475255

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053125

Title:
  Tracking 5.27 Plasma Bugs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/plasma-5.27/+bug/2053125/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054598] Re: AWS kernels lacking sound support (even snd-aloop missing)

2024-03-11 Thread Daniel Gibson
** Description changed:

  I need the snd-aloop module (and its dependencies: snd, snd-timer, snd-
  pcm) on an AWS server.
  
- The linux-modules-extra-aws package (or the one this drags in) used to 
provide that module (as a fix for 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-aws/+bug/1970586) but then 
stopped providing it (probably when upgrading from Kernel 5.15 to 6.2?).
+ The linux-modules-extra-aws package (or the one this drags in) used to 
provide that module (as a fix for 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-aws/+bug/1970586) but then 
stopped providing it (probably when upgrading from Kernel 5.15 to 5.19?).
  That means that this bug is a regression (I didn't find a way to reopen the 
aforementioned bugreport, so I'm creating a new one).
  
  Please bring back snd-aloop (and possibly other modules that make sense
  on a server that doesn't actually have a soundcard).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054598

Title:
  AWS kernels lacking sound support (even snd-aloop missing)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-aws/+bug/2054598/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054598] Re: AWS kernels lacking sound support (even snd-aloop missing)

2024-03-11 Thread Daniel Gibson
This problem persists in Kernel 6.5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054598

Title:
  AWS kernels lacking sound support (even snd-aloop missing)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-aws/+bug/2054598/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968942] Re: Sometimes windows are missing in panels tasklist

2022-05-23 Thread Daniel Gibson
The patch indeed seems to have fixed the issue.

But now I've updated to XUbuntu 22.04 with xfce4-panel 4.16.3-1 and the
bug is back, which means that the also needs to be applied there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968942

Title:
  Sometimes windows are missing in panels tasklist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/1968942/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968942] Re: Sometimes windows are missing in panels tasklist

2022-04-13 Thread Daniel Gibson
This is a patch that's equivalent to the solution XFCE merged (only this
comments the code in question out instead of deleting it).

As far as I can tell it fixes the bug, but I'm not 100% sure as the bug
only happened every few days or so on my system. I'll write another
comment here in case the bug happens again with the patched panel
(-plugin).

** Patch added: "patch based on fix from upstream"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/1968942/+attachment/5580551/+files/fix-missing-window-buttons.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968942

Title:
  Sometimes windows are missing in panels tasklist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/1968942/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968942] [NEW] Sometimes windows are missing in panels tasklist

2022-04-13 Thread Daniel Gibson
Public bug reported:

In xfce4-panel sometimes the tasklist aka "Window Buttons" isn't updated 
correctly, causing some windows to be missing from it and also visual "gaps".
The XFCE bugreport is https://gitlab.xfce.org/xfce/xfce4-panel/-/issues/188
This bug was fixed a month ago with this merge request: 
https://gitlab.xfce.org/xfce/xfce4-panel/-/merge_requests/66

4.14.3 from Ubuntu 20.04 is definitely affected, but as XFCE only merged
the patch a month ago newer xfce4-panel versions from newer Ubuntu
releases are probably affected as well. I didn't test those though.

** Affects: xfce4-panel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968942

Title:
  Sometimes windows are missing in panels tasklist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/1968942/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964695] Re: Pseudo-Terminals are broken, please backport fix from upstream

2022-04-03 Thread Daniel Gibson
Added testcase and patch

** Patch added: "patch from upstream that fixes the bug"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe-5.13/+bug/1964695/+attachment/5576559/+files/fix_tty_64char_lines.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964695

Title:
  Pseudo-Terminals are broken, please backport fix from upstream

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe-5.13/+bug/1964695/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964695] Re: Pseudo-Terminals are broken, please backport fix from upstream

2022-04-03 Thread Daniel Gibson
** Attachment added: "simple testcase to reproduce the bug"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe-5.13/+bug/1964695/+attachment/5576558/+files/ptytest_simple.c

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964695

Title:
  Pseudo-Terminals are broken, please backport fix from upstream

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe-5.13/+bug/1964695/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964695] Re: Pseudo-Terminals are broken, please backport fix from upstream

2022-03-12 Thread Daniel Gibson
** Description changed:

- Pseudo Terminals misbehave with lines that have exactly 64 character 
*including* the terminating newline.
+ Pseudo Terminals misbehave with lines that have exactly 65 characters 
*including* the terminating newline.
  This bug has existed since Kernel 5.12, see 
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215611 for details.
  
  It has recently been fixed, see
  
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=3593030761630e09200072a4bd06468892c27be3
  
  This fix has also been backported into official branches of older (LTS)
  kernel versions (5.10, 5.15, 5.16), see e.g.
  
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.16.14=ee421a75a740d6d8579fb1426141312313287de2
  
  Please backport it to the Ubuntu branch of 5.13 so the fix gets into
  20.04LTS and I can finally use gdb in Eclipse CDT again ;)
  
  Cheers,
  Daniel

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964695

Title:
  Pseudo-Terminals are broken, please backport fix from upstream

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe-5.13/+bug/1964695/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964695] [NEW] Pseudo-Terminals are broken, please backport fix from upstream

2022-03-12 Thread Daniel Gibson
Public bug reported:

Pseudo Terminals misbehave with lines that have exactly 64 character 
*including* the terminating newline.
This bug has existed since Kernel 5.12, see 
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215611 for details.

It has recently been fixed, see
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=3593030761630e09200072a4bd06468892c27be3

This fix has also been backported into official branches of older (LTS)
kernel versions (5.10, 5.15, 5.16), see e.g.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.16.14=ee421a75a740d6d8579fb1426141312313287de2

Please backport it to the Ubuntu branch of 5.13 so the fix gets into
20.04LTS and I can finally use gdb in Eclipse CDT again ;)

Cheers,
Daniel

** Affects: linux-hwe-5.13 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964695

Title:
  Pseudo-Terminals are broken, please backport fix from upstream

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe-5.13/+bug/1964695/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1808874] Re: nvidia-detector doesn't seem to detect nvidia

2021-07-29 Thread Daniel Gibson
> note: I think, in your case, the output of nvidia-detector is correct,
since you don't seem to have an obsolete driver installed.

nope, it's supposed to "Return the recommended driver version", see
https://github.com/tseliot/ubuntu-drivers-
common/blob/138c91aae486f2449d374273ae3790800132f09f/NvidiaDetector/nvidiadetector.py#L40-L48

On my system (XUbuntu 20.04 with Geforce 970) it's what it does, it prints 
"nvidia-driver-470"
I think if it prints "None" that means that it couldn't find any nvidia GPU (or 
maybe at least none it knows a driver for?) on the system

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1808874

Title:
  nvidia-detector doesn't seem to detect nvidia

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/+bug/1808874/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1098720] [NEW] Upgrade from kubuntu 10.10 to 11.04 resulted in error in configurig channels

2013-01-11 Thread Daniel Gibson
Public bug reported:

W:Failed to fetch 
http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/natty/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz  404  
Not Found
, E:Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones 
used instead.

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: dist-upgrade

** Tags added: dist-upgrade

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098720

Title:
  Upgrade from kubuntu 10.10 to 11.04 resulted in error in configurig
  channels

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1098720/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 697476] Re: Upgrade to Kubuntu 10.04 failed - could not install upgrades

2011-01-06 Thread Daniel Gibson
I will do that, however some additional information and actions I took
to get around the problem may either clear up or cloud the logs:

1.  I received the computer in a broken state after owner tried to
upgrade to 9.04.  Computer would not fully boot up, but would go into
the root command line prompt saying that it could not mount partitions.

2.  I discovered that initrd.img appeared to be incompatible with the
kernel being booted by default in the grub menu, and that the default
boot was set to default = 2 - not the usual 0.  (probably due to a
historical problem)  Once I manually selected the first grub menu choice
to boot, the system booted successfully.

3.  I then proceeded to upgrade to 10.09 hoping that this would solve
the problem.  The upgrade reported a failure trying to upgrade flash
plugin, but it seemed to continued the install.  Much later, the install
decided that the upgrade failed and tried to put the system back in the
pre-install condition which I think may have caused the failure reported
here.  At this point the installer requested me to report a problem -
which I did.

4.  Remembering the flash plugin error, I removed this package. I think
it was flash-plugin-nonfree (a transitional package).

5. In System Settings, I did an update to try and see what the state the
computer was in, and it said all packages were up to date.

6.  I then installed the gnome update program, ran it from the console,
and asked it to upgrade to 10.10, again hoping a smooth install would
fix the problem.

7.  I saw that the install went smoothly, and at the end a new
initrd.img was created along with a new kernel downloaded.

8.  When rebooting, I made sure to select the new kernel in grub and
booting was successful.  I then changed default in grub's menu.lst to
a value of 0 from 2.  Maybe I could have commented 'default' out
entirely - not sure.

Everything seems to be fine now, except for some annoying small issues
such as pulseaudio not choosing the correct speaker output initially,
and now it always defaults to muted - you have to manually unmute it
after every reboot/login.  Old flash plugin files were still being used
along with the new ones causing flash not to work in firefox - I had to
manually remove them.  The system now sits at Kubuntu 10.10 - the state
I plan to return it to the owner in.

Based on the above, would you still like the log files?

Regards, and thank-you for the quick response and help,

Daniel Gibson.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697476

Title:
  Upgrade to Kubuntu 10.04 failed - could not install upgrades

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 697476] [NEW] Upgrade to Kubuntu 10.04 failed - could not install upgrades

2011-01-04 Thread Daniel Gibson
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: update-manager

I believe it is related to initrd.img

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697476

Title:
  Upgrade to Kubuntu 10.04 failed - could not install upgrades

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 427944] Re: research.microsoft.com does not load

2010-07-02 Thread Daniel Gibson
This is most probably a bug in your router/firewall
See 
http://caedesnotes.wordpress.com/2010/06/30/bug-hunting-browsers-fail-to-load-research-microsoft-com/
 for further information and possible workarounds.

-- 
research.microsoft.com does not load
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 102801] Re: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin changes width in XFCE4 panel

2008-04-30 Thread Daniel Gibson
This is fixed in debian, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=474330

- Daniel

-- 
xfce4-cpufreq-plugin changes width in XFCE4 panel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102801
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 76366] xfapplet depends on gnome-applets, although it doesn't need it

2006-12-18 Thread Daniel Gibson
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin

The changelog to xfce4-xfapplet-plugin (0.1.0-3ubuntu1) says that it Now 
depends on gnome-applets (the plugin is useless without this).
I think it should be changed back, because you don't need gnome-applets to use 
xfapplet - i personally use it with gxmms (which works really fine without the 
gnome-applets-package) and don't need the 75MB-gnome-stuff that comes with 
gnome-applets.

gnome-applets should be recommended or suggested for xfce4-xfapplet-
plugin, but it really shouldn't depend on it.

my system is xubuntu dapper i386 (I backported xfce4-xfapplet-plugin -
it doesn't need libexo-0.3-dev (= 0.3.1.10rc1-1) by the way, the
version in dapper works for me).

kind regards,

- Daniel Gibson

** Affects: xfce4-xfapplet-plugin (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
xfapplet depends on gnome-applets, although it doesn't need it
https://launchpad.net/bugs/76366

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs