[Bug 1655398]

2019-04-24 Thread David Ayers
I could also only reproduce this with screen shots taken with a
sufficiently high resolution aka buffer.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655398

Title:
  1920x1080 screenshot hangs & fails on clipboard insert (GIMP)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfce4-settings/+bug/1655398/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1655398] Re: 1920x1080 screenshot hangs & fails on clipboard insert (GIMP)

2017-01-10 Thread David Ayers
This may be a known issue:
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10426

** Bug watch added: Xfce Bugzilla #10426
   https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10426

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655398

Title:
  1920x1080 screenshot hangs & fails on clipboard insert (GIMP)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-screenshooter/+bug/1655398/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1655398] [NEW] 1920x1080 screenshot hangs & fails on clipboard insert (GIMP)

2017-01-10 Thread David Ayers
Public bug reported:

This is Xubuntu 16.04 with xfce4-screenshooter 1.8.2-2

We first noticed this using Xubuntu while creating multiple screenshots
with "Print" and inserting them into the LibreOffice document.

open a new LibreOffice Writer document
press "Print"
choose save to clipboard
use context menu in LibreOffice to insert screenshot into document
edit document by simply adding 1 as a counter after the screenshot
press "Print" again
choose save to clipboard
use context menu in LibreOffice to insert screenshot into document
edit document by simply adding 2 as a counter after the screenshot
repeat until either the insert hangs an fails (for us it happened on the 3-8 
iteration)

With a resolution of 1920x1080 we can insert about 6-7 full screen
screenshots before the insert hangs for about ~30 seconds without
inserting any contents.  Yet editing may be resumed after words.  We can
also start LibreOffice Calc and attempt an insert and it would report
the failure that it could not insert the image.

We can also:
start a fresh GIMP instead
press "print"
Choose File->Create->From Clipboard
here we expect the insertion of the screenshot yet instead:
wait for the ~30 second hang
have GIMP report there that it could not retrieve image Data
(If you start with GIMP it may work for the first few screenshots until it 
hangs and fails.)

Since this is reproducible with LO and GIMP we are assuming that the
issue is with xfce-screenshooter.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: xfce4-screenshooter 1.8.2-2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-57.78-generic 4.4.35
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-57-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.4
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Tue Jan 10 17:14:56 2017
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-12-12 (29 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719)
SourcePackage: xfce4-screenshooter
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: xfce4-screenshooter (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655398

Title:
  1920x1080 screenshot hangs & fails on clipboard insert (GIMP)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-screenshooter/+bug/1655398/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1111882] Re: GnuTLS recv error (-9): A TLS packet with unexpected length was received

2016-11-29 Thread David Ayers
TJ stated in early 2013:

"Additional research seems to indicate this is a known intentional
gnutls behaviour (that has been modified in very recent gnutls that
makes use of a recent libnettle - as mentioned above). The issue is,
apparently, the random size padding of packets to prevent communications
compromise for stream ciphers.

Unfortunately the changes required are far too invasive for an SRU so
we'll have to make do with a work-around."

Where do these changes need be implemented? In GNUTLS?
Has anyone with sufficient understanding opened an informed report upstream at 
https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/issues that could be referenced here?
If not, would someone be willing / capable to do that?

Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882

Title:
  GnuTLS recv error (-9): A TLS packet with unexpected length was
  received

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/882/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1622785] Re: package linux-image-extra-4.4.0-36-generic 4.4.0-36.55~14.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2016-09-28 Thread David Ayers
I just had this problem within in a KVM/qemu VM

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1622785

Title:
  package linux-image-extra-4.4.0-36-generic 4.4.0-36.55~14.04.1 failed
  to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools
  exited with return code 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-xenial/+bug/1622785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1358186] [NEW] virtualbox-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox kernel module failed to build

2014-08-18 Thread David Ayers
Public bug reported:

HWE upgrade via update manager gui caused the crash.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-54.81~precise1-generic 3.5.7.33
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-54-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6
Architecture: amd64
DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-34-generic
Date: Mon Aug 18 10:41:57 2014
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20130213)
MarkForUpload: True
PackageArchitecture: all
PackageVersion: 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6
SourcePackage: virtualbox
Title: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox kernel module failed 
to build
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: virtualbox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358186

Title:
  virtualbox-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox kernel module
  failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1358186/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1278489] [NEW] sync of file never completes

2014-02-10 Thread David Ayers
Private bug reported:

It seems that at some time ubuntuone started repeating to sync a
specific file and it seems to attempt to resync it very often and then
aborts without user any notification.

I am attaching the debug output of syncdaemon.log.

The file in question is:
Dokumente/nm9WNjuIsi3yJVdZtnbX,3jP/8RGh5Ng2UOMgpvNVbV9yjCKe/D0aJ,qOmkFnNCVxMPTXqgoPA/G9ZKdwHcQHxEQKDQUG0HlEHH-htB2gQhyenaJYW7ZQU5HtVmPc90326Ed1ddH4OUjf,
(this happens to be an encfs encrypted file, but that shouldn't matter.)

Please note that the synchronized folder itself is rather large (1.6GB)
and a full resync would use a lot of bandwidth.

The last debug output is:
2014-02-10 16:34:33,692 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.ActionQueue - WARNING - Upload   
share:'41de9e05-18b2-4f37-9adc-8cdd37a49b0b'   
node:'4f6c76e6-62db-4ab0-baf9-e7481446fa43'   
Upload(share_id='41de9e05-18b2-4f37-9adc-8cdd37a49b0b', 
hash='sha1:ce18f6b917939ff895adb806a1b35f6ce9f2da7c', running='False', 
node_id='4f6c76e6-62db-4ab0-baf9-e7481446fa43', 
upload_id='39681e5b-4e2d-4e23-ac6c-c3c372866f87', crc32='466984079L', 
path='/home/ayers/.encrypted/Dokumente/nm9WNjuIsi3yJVdZtnbX,3jP/8RGh5Ng2UOMgpvNVbV9yjCKe/D0aJ,qOmkFnNCVxMPTXqgoPA/G9ZKdwHcQHxEQKDQUG0HlEHH-htB2gQhyenaJYW7ZQU5HtVmPc90326Ed1ddH4OUjf,',
 previous_hash='', size='69978983') failure: UPLOAD_CANCELED
2014-02-10 16:34:33,693 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.ActionQueue - DEBUG - Upload 
  share:'41de9e05-18b2-4f37-9adc-8cdd37a49b0b'   
node:'4f6c76e6-62db-4ab0-baf9-e7481446fa43'   
Upload(share_id='41de9e05-18b2-4f37-9adc-8cdd37a49b0b', 
hash='sha1:ce18f6b917939ff895adb806a1b35f6ce9f2da7c', running='False', 
node_id='4f6c76e6-62db-4ab0-baf9-e7481446fa43', 
upload_id='39681e5b-4e2d-4e23-ac6c-c3c372866f87', crc32='466984079L', 
path='/home/ayers/.encrypted/Dokumente/nm9WNjuIsi3yJVdZtnbX,3jP/8RGh5Ng2UOMgpvNVbV9yjCKe/D0aJ,qOmkFnNCVxMPTXqgoPA/G9ZKdwHcQHxEQKDQUG0HlEHH-htB2gQhyenaJYW7ZQU5HtVmPc90326Ed1ddH4OUjf,',
 previous_hash='', size='69978983') cleanup
2014-02-10 16:34:33,694 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.EQ - DEBUG - push_event: 
AQ_UPLOAD_ERROR, kwargs: {'share_id': '41de9e05-18b2-4f37-9adc-8cdd37a49b0b', 
'hash': 'sha1:ce18f6b917939ff895adb806a1b35f6ce9f2da7c', 'node_id': 
'4f6c76e6-62db-4ab0-baf9-e7481446fa43', 'error': 'UPLOAD_CANCELED'}
2014-02-10 16:34:33,694 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.InteractionInterfaces - DEBUG - 
handle_AQ_UPLOAD_ERROR: args 
(ubuntuone.syncdaemon.interaction_interfaces.SyncdaemonEventListener object at 
0x12cb5e90,), kwargs {'share_id': '41de9e05-18b2-4f37-9adc-8cdd37a49b0b', 
'hash': 'sha1:ce18f6b917939ff895adb806a1b35f6ce9f2da7c', 'node_id': 
'4f6c76e6-62db-4ab0-baf9-e7481446fa43', 'error': 'UPLOAD_CANCELED'}.
2014-02-10 16:34:33,696 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.InteractionInterfaces - DEBUG - 
handle_AQ_UPLOAD_ERROR: result None.
2014-02-10 16:34:33,698 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.sync - DEBUG - T:LOCAL:F 
5368e5ff-def5-4a81-8258-c2b0ed514c19 
['41de9e05-18b2-4f37-9adc-8cdd37a49b0b'::'4f6c76e6-62db-4ab0-baf9-e7481446fa43']
 
''Dokumente/nm9WNjuIsi3yJVdZtnbX,3jP/8RGh5Ng2UOMgpvNVbV9yjCKe/D0aJ,qOmkFnNCVxMPTXqgoPA/G9ZKdwHcQHxEQKDQUG0HlEHH-htB2gQhyenaJYW7ZQU5HtVmPc90326Ed1ddH4OUjf,''
 | EVENT: AQ_UPLOAD_ERROR:{'hash_eq_local_hash': 'T', 'hash_eq_server_hash': 
'F', 'not_available': 'F', 'not_authorized': 'F'} with ARGS:('UPLOAD_CANCELED', 
'sha1:ce18f6b917939ff895adb806a1b35f6ce9f2da7c')
2014-02-10 16:34:33,700 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.sync - INFO - T:LOCAL:F 
5368e5ff-def5-4a81-8258-c2b0ed514c19 
['41de9e05-18b2-4f37-9adc-8cdd37a49b0b'::'4f6c76e6-62db-4ab0-baf9-e7481446fa43']
 
''Dokumente/nm9WNjuIsi3yJVdZtnbX,3jP/8RGh5Ng2UOMgpvNVbV9yjCKe/D0aJ,qOmkFnNCVxMPTXqgoPA/G9ZKdwHcQHxEQKDQUG0HlEHH-htB2gQhyenaJYW7ZQU5HtVmPc90326Ed1ddH4OUjf,''
 | Calling nothing (got AQ_UPLOAD_ERROR:{'hash_eq_local_hash': 'T', 
'hash_eq_server_hash': 'F', 'not_available': 'F', 'not_authorized': 'F'})
2014-02-10 16:34:33,702 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.sync - DEBUG - T:LOCAL:F 
5368e5ff-def5-4a81-8258-c2b0ed514c19 
['41de9e05-18b2-4f37-9adc-8cdd37a49b0b'::'4f6c76e6-62db-4ab0-baf9-e7481446fa43']
 
''Dokumente/nm9WNjuIsi3yJVdZtnbX,3jP/8RGh5Ng2UOMgpvNVbV9yjCKe/D0aJ,qOmkFnNCVxMPTXqgoPA/G9ZKdwHcQHxEQKDQUG0HlEHH-htB2gQhyenaJYW7ZQU5HtVmPc90326Ed1ddH4OUjf,''
 | Called nothing
2014-02-10 16:34:33,727 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.ActionQueue - DEBUG - Upload 
  share:'41de9e05-18b2-4f37-9adc-8cdd37a49b0b'   
node:'4f6c76e6-62db-4ab0-baf9-e7481446fa43'   
Upload(share_id='41de9e05-18b2-4f37-9adc-8cdd37a49b0b', 
hash='sha1:ce18f6b917939ff895adb806a1b35f6ce9f2da7c', running='False', 
node_id='4f6c76e6-62db-4ab0-baf9-e7481446fa43', 
upload_id='39681e5b-4e2d-4e23-ac6c-c3c372866f87', crc32='466984079L', 
path='/home/ayers/.encrypted/Dokumente/nm9WNjuIsi3yJVdZtnbX,3jP/8RGh5Ng2UOMgpvNVbV9yjCKe/D0aJ,qOmkFnNCVxMPTXqgoPA/G9ZKdwHcQHxEQKDQUG0HlEHH-htB2gQhyenaJYW7ZQU5HtVmPc90326Ed1ddH4OUjf,',
 previous_hash='', size='69978983') semaphore released
2014-02-10 16:34:33,727 - ubuntuone.SyncDaemon.ActionQueue - DEBUG - Upload  

[Bug 748080] Re: 1002:9612 [HP Pavilion tx2500 Notebook PC] ATI card fan is always on with opensource radeon driver

2014-01-24 Thread David Ayers
Thank you for the update!

Would this power management update also be available for:
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with the linux-image-generic-lts-saucy package which depends 
on linux-image-3.11.0-15-generic when grub is configured as described for 13.10?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748080

Title:
  1002:9612 [HP Pavilion tx2500 Notebook PC] ATI card fan is always on
  with opensource radeon driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/748080/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1267565] Re: psensor hangs when closing preferences

2014-01-20 Thread David Ayers
Thanks for the info! Instead of describing exactly what I did from
memory I wanted to attach a WebM video, just never got around to it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267565

Title:
  psensor hangs when closing preferences

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psensor/+bug/1267565/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1267565] Re: psensor hangs when closing preferences

2014-01-20 Thread David Ayers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1258669 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1258669

Thanks Jean-Philippe,
I tried:
env UBUNTU_MENU_PROXY= psensor
but I did have the same result.  Does it work for you with that command line?

I was just about to post the recordmydesktop screencast, but that is
buggy also that you cannot really tell the issue in the video.

I will now upgrade my system to the current packages and will retry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267565

Title:
  psensor hangs when closing preferences

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psensor/+bug/1267565/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1270867] Re: Video recording is corrupted on saucy snaphot

2014-01-20 Thread David Ayers
Here is the corrupted recording:


** Attachment added: Recorded Screencast Snippet
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/recordmydesktop/+bug/1270867/+attachment/3952890/+files/recordMyDesktop.ogv

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1270867

Title:
  Video recording is corrupted on saucy snaphot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/recordmydesktop/+bug/1270867/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1270867] [NEW] Video recording is corrupted on saucy snaphot

2014-01-20 Thread David Ayers
Public bug reported:

While trying to record video to show how to reproduce another bug in
noticed that recorded Videos are corrupted.  I will attach the
recording.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: recordmydesktop 0.3.8.1+svn602-1ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-4.19-generic 3.13.0-rc8
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-4-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.13.1-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Mon Jan 20 16:50:24 2014
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-01-09 (10 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Alpha amd64 (20140109)
SourcePackage: recordmydesktop
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: recordmydesktop (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1270867

Title:
  Video recording is corrupted on saucy snaphot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/recordmydesktop/+bug/1270867/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1267565] Re: psensor hangs when closing preferences

2014-01-20 Thread David Ayers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1258669 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1258669

Upgrade didn't help.  If you're still interested in the corrupted video,
see bug #1270867 but you can't really see me click the Cancel button
on the preferences pane... but since you can reproduce it anyway, it
really doesn't matter.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267565

Title:
  psensor hangs when closing preferences

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psensor/+bug/1267565/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1267565] Re: psensor hangs when closing preferences

2014-01-12 Thread David Ayers
Hi!

it took me a while since I have replace my hard drive to test.  I've
attached the log.  Unfortunately it doesn't seem to contain any useful
information as I can tell.  psensor seems to happily continue measure
while the UI is locked when I attempt to close the preferences window.

I'll see if I can start psensor under gdb.

Thanks!

** Attachment added: psensor log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psensor/+bug/1267565/+attachment/3946795/+files/log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267565

Title:
  psensor hangs when closing preferences

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psensor/+bug/1267565/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1267565] Re: psensor hangs when closing preferences

2014-01-12 Thread David Ayers
after continuing and pressing control C again I get:
(gdb) info threads
  Id   Target Id Frame 
  6Thread 0x7fffd5c9f700 (LWP 4918) gmain 0x74a9c65d in poll () 
at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
  4Thread 0x7fffd7607700 (LWP 4911) psensor 0x74a7014d in 
nanosleep () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
  3Thread 0x7fffe5b31700 (LWP 4910) dconf worker 0x74a9c65d in 
poll () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
  2Thread 0x7fffe71f0700 (LWP 4908) gdbus 0x74a9c65d in poll () 
at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
* 1Thread 0x77fb6a00 (LWP 4902) psensor __lll_lock_wait () at 
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:135

(gdb) bt full 1
#0  __lll_lock_wait () at 
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:135
No locals.
(More stack frames follow...)
(gdb) bt full 2
#0  __lll_lock_wait () at 
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:135
No locals.
#1  0x74d8068d in _L_lock_1086 () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
(More stack frames follow...)
(gdb) bt full 3
#0  __lll_lock_wait () at 
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:135
No locals.
#1  0x74d8068d in _L_lock_1086 () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#2  0x74d80607 in __GI___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x88ea90) at 
../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:134
max_cnt = -1
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = __pthread_mutex_lock
type = 4294966784
(More stack frames follow...)
(gdb) bt full 4
#0  __lll_lock_wait () at 
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:135
No locals.
#1  0x74d8068d in _L_lock_1086 () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#2  0x74d80607 in __GI___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x88ea90) at 
../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:134
max_cnt = -1
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = __pthread_mutex_lock
type = 4294966784
#3  0x768e2121 in g_mutex_lock () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
(More stack frames follow...)
(gdb) bt full 6
#0  __lll_lock_wait () at 
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:135
No locals.
#1  0x74d8068d in _L_lock_1086 () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#2  0x74d80607 in __GI___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x88ea90) at 
../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:134
max_cnt = -1
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = __pthread_mutex_lock
type = 4294966784
#3  0x768e2121 in g_mutex_lock () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#4  0x77443d80 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#5  0x768a19f5 in g_main_context_dispatch () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
(More stack frames follow...)

So there seems to be some deadlock issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267565

Title:
  psensor hangs when closing preferences

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psensor/+bug/1267565/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1267565] Re: psensor hangs when closing preferences

2014-01-12 Thread David Ayers
OK so here is my gdb output:

GNU gdb (GDB) 7.6.50.20131218-cvs-ubuntu
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type show copying
and show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux-gnu.
Type show configuration for configuration details.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/.
Find the GDB manual and other documentation resources online at:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/documentation/.
For help, type help.
Type apropos word to search for commands related to word...
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/psensor...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/bin/psensor -d3
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1.
[1389528695] [INFO] Fehlerdiagnosemodus wird aktiviert.
[New Thread 0x7fffe71f0700 (LWP 4908)]

** (psensor:4902): WARNING **: Couldn't register with accessibility bus: Did 
not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not 
send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply 
timeout expired, or the network connection was broken.
[New Thread 0x7fffe5b31700 (LWP 4910)]
[1389528696] [ERR] hddtemp: Öffnen der Verbindung gescheitert.
[1389528696] [ERR] Ermittlung der NVIDIA-Informationen gescheitert.
[New Thread 0x7fffd7607700 (LWP 4911)]
[New Thread 0x7fffd6e06700 (LWP 4912)]
[New Thread 0x7fffd5c9f700 (LWP 4918)]
[New Thread 0x7fffd549e700 (LWP 4919)]
[Thread 0x7fffd549e700 (LWP 4919) exited]
^C
Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
__lll_lock_wait () at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:135
135 ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S: Datei oder 
Verzeichnis nicht gefunden.

I pressed control C in gdb once the window turned dark gray after trying
to close one of the preferences windows (the lockup happens for both
preferences panes).

here are the backtraces:
(gdb) bt full
#0  __lll_lock_wait () at 
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:135
No locals.
#1  0x74d8068d in _L_lock_1086 () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#2  0x74d80607 in __GI___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x88ea90) at 
../nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:134
max_cnt = -1
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = __pthread_mutex_lock
type = 4294966784
#3  0x768e2121 in g_mutex_lock () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#4  0x77443d80 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#5  0x768a19f5 in g_main_context_dispatch () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#6  0x768a1d58 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#7  0x768a215a in g_main_loop_run () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#8  0x7786b9b5 in gtk_main () from 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#9  0x0040931f in main ()
No symbol table info available.

(gdb) info threads
  Id   Target Id Frame 
  6Thread 0x7fffd5c9f700 (LWP 4918) gmain 0x74a9c65d in poll () 
at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
  5Thread 0x7fffd6e06700 (LWP 4912) pool 
pthread_cond_timedwait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 ()
at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_timedwait.S:238
  4Thread 0x7fffd7607700 (LWP 4911) psensor 0x74a7014d in 
nanosleep () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
  3Thread 0x7fffe5b31700 (LWP 4910) dconf worker 0x74a9c65d in 
poll () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
  2Thread 0x7fffe71f0700 (LWP 4908) gdbus 0x74a9c65d in poll () 
at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
* 1Thread 0x77fb6a00 (LWP 4902) psensor __lll_lock_wait () at 
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:135

(gdb) bt full 2
#0  0x74a9c65d in poll () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
No locals.
#1  0x768a1cf4 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
(More stack frames follow...)

(gdb) bt full 3
#0  0x74a9c65d in poll () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
No locals.
#1  0x768a1cf4 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#2  0x768a215a in g_main_loop_run () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
(More stack frames follow...)

(gdb) bt full 4
#0  0x74a9c65d in poll () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
No locals.
#1  0x768a1cf4 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
No symbol table info available.

[Bug 1080350] Re: CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
This bug was reported against 12.04 LTS and yes I am using extra cooling
right now because while the ubuntuone syncdeamon is registering it's
files and deja-dup is doing it's backup the temperature still peaks at
85°( with external cooling!).  So the issue still exists.

I'll try to install a current live image in a spare SSD on the weekend
as requested.  But isn't this a little late in the release cycle to
actually fix anything for the upcoming LTS?  Anyway...I will try.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1080350] Re: CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
OK, I've installed a snapshot but I believe it may be too buggy to actually 
test it:
- psensor freezes when configuring the graph
- ubunutoone configuration crashes with:
KeyError
u'8e0fc793-4ee0-49e3-8a9d-38a077438bfb'
... I'll try again with tomorrow's snapshot.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1267565] [NEW] psensor hangs when closing preferences

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
Public bug reported:

I'm running a trusty daily to confirm another bug and configured
psensors colors.

When clicking the OK button the psensor hangs.  It has to be killed and
restarted, but changes did take effect.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: psensor 0.8.0.3-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-1.16-generic 3.13.0-rc7
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-1-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.12.7-0ubuntu6
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Thu Jan  9 19:22:18 2014
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-01-09 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Alpha amd64 (20140109)
SourcePackage: psensor
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: psensor (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267565

Title:
  psensor hangs when closing preferences

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/psensor/+bug/1267565/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] BootDmesg.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944547/+files/BootDmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] Re: 1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
Thanks, put proprietary drivers are not a option for me.  I'd rather
stick with the external cooling.

Despite the error messages, the ubuntu-one files seem to by syncing now.
And the psensor preference changes took effect after I killed the
process and restarted it.  So'll still continue test with this image.
Yet it will take a few hours before enough files are synchronized to
cause the ubuntuone-sync daemon to saturate the CPU after logging in.

You added a 'needs-full-computer-model' tag, yet you have added the
computer model int eh summary title.  Was this some automation
mechanism, or do you need some more information?  I will still attempt
to execute the apport-collect command.


** Tags added: apport-collected compiz-0.9 reproducible trusty

** Description changed:

  Ever since upgrading from Maverick (with GNOME Classic) to Precise
  (using Unity 2D since using the default Unity makes the situation worse)
  my note book regularly overheats with normal usage:
  
  I've been regularly using:
  echo low | sudo tee /sys/class/drm/card0/device/power_profile
  
  I've am also using psensor to warn me if the temperature rises above
  92°.  When 'idle' the temperature is at about 80°.  If the CPU is used
  (merely starting eclipse and letting all the the startup validation
  processes finish) it quickly rises to 88°.  If the usages is sustained
  (rebuilding a java project) the temperature oscillates between 95° and
  98°.  If I do anything else that adds to the load (ie. if the
  temperature is 98° for short period of time), the system freezes, but
  the everything remains on, fans and CPU temperature stays up.  I need to
  turn off the notebook by keeping the power button pressed.
  
  Note that this system overheats /with/ the low power profile.
  
  Here are some general stats about this system, please let me know, if I
  can provide further information:
  
  HP Presario CQ61 320eg
  AMD Turion(tm) II Dual-Core Mobile M500
  01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RV710 
[Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Series] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
  Linux schiefer 3.2.0-33-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 18 16:29:15 UTC 2012 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
  ayers@schiefer:~$ lsmod|grep rad
  radeon804503  2 
  ttm76949  1 radeon
  drm_kms_helper 46978  1 radeon
  drm   241921  4 radeon,ttm,drm_kms_helper
  i2c_algo_bit   13423  1 radeon
  
  This started after the upgrading from Maverick.  I'm currently running
  Precise with the 2D Unity desktop.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeon 1:6.14.99~git20111219.aacbd629-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-33.52-generic 3.2.31
  Uname: Linux 3.2.0-33-generic x86_64
  .tmp.unity.support.test.0:
   
  ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu14
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: 
[core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,compiztoolbox,grid,resize,snap,vpswitch,move,mousepoll,wall,place,imgpng,gnomecompat,unitymtgrabhandles,regex,session,animation,fade,workarounds,scale,expo,ezoom,unityshell]
  CompositorRunning: None
  Date: Sun Nov 18 14:30:50 2012
  DistUpgraded: 2012-04-29 09:57:42,118 DEBUG enabling apt cron job
  DistroCodename: precise
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes,
  GraphicsCard:
   Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RV710 [Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Series] 
[1002:9552] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3652]
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007)
  MachineType: Hewlett-Packard Presario CQ61 Notebook PC
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.2.0-33-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/vg--hostname-lv--ubuntu ro vga=795 quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-ati
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-29 (203 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 10/10/2009
  dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  dmi.bios.version: F.07
  dmi.board.name: 3652
  dmi.board.vendor: Quanta
  dmi.board.version: 42.14
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Quanta
  dmi.chassis.version: N/A
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrF.07:bd10/10/2009:svnHewlett-Packard:pnPresarioCQ61NotebookPC:pvr039210210D102:rvnQuanta:rn3652:rvr42.14:cvnQuanta:ct10:cvrN/A:
  dmi.product.name: Presario CQ61 Notebook PC
  dmi.product.version: 039210210D102
  dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1.4
  version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.32-1ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.2
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.2
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.8
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.0-0ubuntu1.2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 

[Bug 1080350] XorgLog.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944566/+files/XorgLog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] ProcEnviron.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcEnviron.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944559/+files/ProcEnviron.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] xserver.devices.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: xserver.devices.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944569/+files/xserver.devices.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] ProcInterrupts.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944560/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] Lspci.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944556/+files/Lspci.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] xserver.outputs.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: xserver.outputs.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944570/+files/xserver.outputs.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] UdevLog.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944564/+files/UdevLog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944558/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] UnitySupportTest.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: UnitySupportTest.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944565/+files/UnitySupportTest.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] Dependencies.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944550/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] BootLog.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: BootLog.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944548/+files/BootLog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] CurrentDmesg.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944549/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] DpkgLog.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: DpkgLog.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944551/+files/DpkgLog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] LightdmDisplayLog.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: LightdmDisplayLog.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944553/+files/LightdmDisplayLog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] Xrandr.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944567/+files/Xrandr.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] LightdmGreeterLog.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: LightdmGreeterLog.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944554/+files/LightdmGreeterLog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] UdevDb.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944563/+files/UdevDb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] LightdmLog.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: LightdmLog.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944555/+files/LightdmLog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] xdpyinfo.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944568/+files/xdpyinfo.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] GconfCompiz.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: GconfCompiz.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944552/+files/GconfCompiz.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] Lsusb.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944557/+files/Lsusb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] ProcModules.txt

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350/+attachment/3944561/+files/ProcModules.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1267590] [NEW] Automatic Backup after fresh install of trusty fails: no such file or directory

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
Public bug reported:

While testing da daily snapshot to verfy a different issue I configured
deja-dup to add the typical load to my system.

I configured an SSH upload.

deja-dup failed with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 1473, in module
with_tempdir(main)
  File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 1466, in with_tempdir
fn()
  File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 1436, in main
full_backup(col_stats)
  File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 541, in full_backup
globals.backend)
  File /usr/bin/duplicity, line 402, in write_multivol
globals.gpg_profile, globals.volsize)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/gpg.py, line 324, in 
GPGWriteFile
file = GPGFile(True, path.Path(filename), profile)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/gpg.py, line 105, in 
__init__
self.logger_fp = tempfile.TemporaryFile( dir=tempdir.default().dir() )
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/tempfile.py, line 493, in TemporaryFile
(fd, name) = _mkstemp_inner(dir, prefix, suffix, flags)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/tempfile.py, line 239, in _mkstemp_inner
fd = _os.open(file, flags, 0600)
OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
'/tmp/duplicity-dH5tyj-tempdir/tmpTVOITr'

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: deja-dup 29.1-0ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-1.16-generic 3.13.0-rc7
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-1-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.12.7-0ubuntu6
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Thu Jan  9 21:36:37 2014
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-01-09 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Alpha amd64 (20140109)
SourcePackage: deja-dup
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: deja-dup (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267590

Title:
  Automatic Backup after fresh install of trusty fails: no such file or
  directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/1267590/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] Re: 1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
Thanks for all the extra pointers... will try them once I get a base line for 
trusty.  Unfortunately the standard triggers ubuntu-one  Deja-Dup may not be 
trivial to test.  See #LP 1267590
But I'll try some other cpu intensive things... possiibly backup-manager with 
gpg.

Currently the temperatur is between 60°-65° while idle which is already
a big improvement!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1080350] Re: 1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
Thanks, Christopher, but I believe most packages supported by UbuntuAdvantate 
subscriptions are only available under Unity.
I'd rather stick to them, mostly because I'm hoping to have less issues with 
default settings and applications.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] Re: 1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
OK so after letting ubuntuone sync finish overnight, login out and back
in this morning, successfully starting deja-dup manually while ubuntuone
was collecting its files, watching the making of Sintel in WebM in the
browser, while installing precise via virt-manager, psensor indicated
that the temperature never went above 91° and after ubuntuone finished
collecting it's files, dropped to 80° while the rest was still happily
using CPU.  It was a but sluggish at times, indicating throttling.  But
it seems that with the default settings (no profile adjustments needed),
the code in trusty does not overheat (esp. no lockups) can be
reproduced.

I will try to work without th external cooling in precise now, to see if
this still is an issue there, since there have been plenty of updates
since.  But I would say that the overheating issue is fixed for trusty.

Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1267590] Re: Automatic Backup after fresh install of trusty fails: no such file or directory

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
While again using deja-dup to produce load for testing another issue, I
was able to start a backup manually and it ran for quite some time
before crashing with a comparable stack trace.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267590

Title:
  Automatic Backup after fresh install of trusty fails: no such file or
  directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/1267590/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] Re: 1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

2014-01-09 Thread David Ayers
I was able to peak the temperature 96° on precise, but couldn't get it
to lockup anymore.  So I have to correct my original statement that the
issue persists.  It was based on the fact that the temperature rose
rather quickly above 90° after login while duplicity was running and
ubuntuone was collecting it's files.  But even with a virtual machine
doing some processing and watching multiple vidoes in a browser it seems
that the temperature remains under 96° on precise and the CPU does not
lockup anymore.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  1002:9552 [Compaq Presario CQ61-320EG Notebook PC] CPU Overheating
  with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1257262] Re: backup-manager is not removing the correct files

2013-12-13 Thread David Ayers
Unfortunately that suspicion was moot.

It seems the final decision is made in backup-manager-purge and one
difference seems to be that the md5 file doesn't have a master:

# we can outdate a master only if a younger master exists   
 
if ($data-{master}) {
foreach my $master_date (
keys %{$g_rh_archives-{$data-{name}}{pathByDateMasters}}) {
if ($master_date  $data-{date}) {
# This is where none of the other files get pushed since master_date == 
$date-{date}
push @{$ra_outdated}, $archive;
last;
}
}
}

# here the archive is deprecated, its date is  to $purge_date  
 
else {
# if BM_ARCHIVE_STRICTPURGE is true, we can only purge  
 
# an archive prefixed with BM_ARCHIVE_PREFIX
 
next if (($ENV{BM_ARCHIVE_STRICTPURGE} eq true) and
 ($data-{prefix} ne $ENV{BM_ARCHIVE_PREFIX}));

# now, we're sure we can outdate the archive
 
push @{$ra_outdated}, $archive;
# This is where the md5 file gets pushed
}

So currently I'm still wondering on whether some analog date check
should be added when no master exists, or whether the date check against
the master could possibly be bogus.

But I'm also starting to believe that the issue really only manifests
since the weekly backup (which requires these master checks) is paired
with a TTL of merely 2 days.  The intent is to insure that the backup is
done automatically at least once a week, but only 2 sets of archives
should be retained due to space constraints.  But I guess that cannot be
be expressed correctly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257262

Title:
  backup-manager is not removing the correct files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backup-manager/+bug/1257262/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 831594] Re: email causes preview to stop working until restart or crashes evolution

2013-12-08 Thread David Ayers
Updated Bug reference to the bug the upstream bug was marked duplicate of. 
The old reference was:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661690

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #655248
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655248

** Changed in: evolution
   Importance: Critical = Unknown

** Changed in: evolution
   Status: Invalid = Unknown

** Changed in: evolution
 Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #661690 = GNOME Bug Tracker #655248

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831594

Title:
  email causes preview to stop working until restart or crashes
  evolution

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/831594/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1254024] Re: evolution does not display active email

2013-12-08 Thread David Ayers
I find this seems to happen with mails larger than a certain size.  But
it may be some other aspect of the mail.

See: Bug #865461 (and a few other potential duplicates)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1254024

Title:
  evolution does not display active email

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1254024/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1257262] Re: backup-manager is not removing the correct files

2013-12-04 Thread David Ayers
After adding some Debug-Logs to the scripts, it seems this my be a
result of a previous abort of a backup run which failed to produce an
MD5 file.  Will only a maximum of one file per prefix be removed?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257262

Title:
  backup-manager is not removing the correct files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backup-manager/+bug/1257262/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1257262] [NEW] backup-manager is not removing the correct files

2013-12-03 Thread David Ayers
Public bug reported:

I have set:

# Number of days we have to keep an archive (Time To Live)
export BM_ARCHIVE_TTL=2
export BM_LOGGER_LEVEL=info

yet have a weekly anachron job which creates my archives.  I'm not sure
whether the 2 is actually meant to mean two days or two backups.
But in any case the processing seems wrong:

Anacron is invoking the weekly script on 2013-12-3 and is removing only
the md5 file 20131126 yet not the corresponding archive files.  After
the processing below I still have:

-rw--- 1 root root 71 Dez  3 08:43 schiefer-20131203.md5
-rw-rw 1 root root2391242 Nov 26 10:06 
schiefer-etc.20131126.master.tar.bz2
-rw--- 1 root root2390977 Dez  3 08:43 
schiefer-etc.20131203.master.tar.bz2
-rw-rw 1 root root 7583581916 Nov 26 11:37 
schiefer-home-ayers.20131126.master.tar.bz2
-rw-rw 1 root root   4779 Nov 26 10:06 
schiefer-usr-local.20131126.master.tar.bz2
-rw-rw 1 root root 1173007204 Nov 26 10:18 
schiefer-var-lib-home.20131126.master.tar.bz2

3 files from last weeks backup.  Because only the md5file was removed
yet not the corresponding archives leads to the message: No md5file
found: /var/archives/schiefer-20131126.md5

(There are other disturbing issues but I'll open separate bugs for
them.)

Dec  3 08:43:18 schiefer backup-manager[4301]: info * Getting lock for 
backup-manager 4301 with /etc/backup-manager.conf
Dec  3 08:43:18 schiefer backup-manager[4301]: info * Cleaning /var/archives
Dec  3 08:43:18 schiefer backup-manager-purge[5163]: info  * Reading archives 
from STDIN - BackupManager::Dialog::print_info (/usr/bin/backup-manager-purge 
l. 302)
Dec  3 08:43:18 schiefer backup-manager-purge[5163]: info  * Outdating archives 
made before 20131201 - BackupManager::Dialog::print_info 
(/usr/bin/backup-manager-purge l. 245)
Dec  3 08:43:18 schiefer backup-manager[4301]: info * Removing archive 
/var/archives/schiefer-20131126.md5.
Dec  3 08:43:18 schiefer backup-manager[4301]: info * Removing archive 
/var/archives/schiefer-etc.20131122.master.tar.bz2.
Dec  3 08:43:18 schiefer backup-manager[4301]: info * Removing archive 
/var/archives/schiefer-home-ayers.20131122.master.tar.bz2.
Dec  3 08:43:18 schiefer backup-manager[4301]: info * Removing archive 
/var/archives/schiefer-usr-local.20131122.master.tar.bz2.
Dec  3 08:43:18 schiefer backup-manager[4301]: info * Removing archive 
/var/archives/schiefer-var-lib-home.20131122.master.tar.bz2.
Dec  3 08:43:18 schiefer backup-manager[4301]: info * Using method tarball.
Dec  3 08:43:21 schiefer backup-manager[4301]: error * No md5file found: 
/var/archives/schiefer-20131126.md5
Dec  3 08:43:21 schiefer backup-manager[4301]: info * Running post-command: 
/usr/local/sbin/backup-manager-post

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: backup-manager 0.7.9-3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-56.86-generic 3.2.51
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-56-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Dec  3 12:56:34 2013
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120823.1)
MarkForUpload: True
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=de_AT:de
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=de_AT.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: backup-manager
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: backup-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257262

Title:
  backup-manager is not removing the correct files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backup-manager/+bug/1257262/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1257270] [NEW] backup-manager BM_POST_BACKUP_COMMAND is executed after processing each archive

2013-12-03 Thread David Ayers
Public bug reported:

# Enter here some shell script. 
 
# It will be executed after the last action of backup-manager.  
 
export BM_POST_BACKUP_COMMAND=/usr/local/sbin/backup-manager-post

The BM_POST_BACKUP_COMMAND is documented to be be executed as the last
action of backup-manager.  Yet it is executed after each archive listed
in BM_TARBALL_DIRECTORIES.

I'm not sure whether the documentation is misleading or the processing
is buggy.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: backup-manager 0.7.9-3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-56.86-generic 3.2.51
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-56-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Dec  3 13:26:17 2013
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120823.1)
MarkForUpload: True
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=de_AT:de
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=de_AT.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: backup-manager
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: backup-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257270

Title:
  backup-manager BM_POST_BACKUP_COMMAND is executed after processing
  each archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backup-manager/+bug/1257270/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 702148] Re: Please suggest adding sender's email to mails only containing BCC recipients

2013-11-06 Thread David Ayers
This has been fixed in subsequent versions.

** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702148

Title:
  Please suggest adding sender's email to mails only containing BCC
  recipients

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/702148/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 692299] Re: next/prev button in mail pane should respect thread grouping

2013-11-06 Thread David Ayers
I can confirm that this bug still exists in Evolution 3.2.3 available on
12.04 LTS

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692299

Title:
  next/prev button in mail pane should respect thread grouping

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/692299/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 33414] Re: NO Undo in Evolution Memo

2013-11-06 Thread David Ayers
I can confirm that this issue still exists in Evolution 3.2.3 provided
by 12.04 LTS

** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33414

Title:
  NO Undo in Evolution Memo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/33414/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 184318] Re: Automatic encryption when replying to an encrypted email

2013-11-06 Thread David Ayers
I can confirm that this issue has been fixed at least since Evolution
3.2.3 provided by 12.04 LTS


** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184318

Title:
  Automatic encryption when replying to an encrypted email

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/184318/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403553] Re: Undo are not work in To and Subject fields in message compose window

2013-11-06 Thread David Ayers
I can confirm that this issue still exists in Evolution 3.2.3 provided
by 12.04 LTS

** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403553

Title:
  Undo are not work in To and Subject fields in message compose window

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/403553/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 689271] Re: Evolution fails to decrypt GPG message if signature (not encryption) key is not available

2013-11-06 Thread David Ayers
I can confirm that this issue still exists in Evolution 3.2.3 provided
by 12.04 LTS


** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689271

Title:
  Evolution fails to decrypt GPG message if signature (not encryption)
  key is not available

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/689271/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 232340] Re: CaCert Certificates not installed

2013-11-06 Thread David Ayers
I can confirm that this issue still exists in Evolution 3.2.3 provided
by 12.04 LTS

But I don't want to reopen this issue /in Evolution/ ... at least not
quite yet, as I'm not sure it belongs here (or not just here).

I believe the correct approach would be to have an application like
seahorse manage the CA's that a user trusts and then have other
applications like Evolution, Thunderbird, Firefox, Epiphany, ...  defer
to gnome-keyring to verify the key's and CA's that a user trusts.

I'm uncertain whether gnome-key or seahorse have any support for CA's
and I fear that most CA handling is within each application as is the
case for Evolution.  But then the handling of CA files must become much
simpler that what is currently offered.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232340

Title:
  CaCert Certificates not installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/232340/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 232340] Re: CaCert Certificates not installed

2013-11-06 Thread David Ayers
The important issue is not who Mozilla trusts, but who the user trusts.
The issue also doesn't solely apply to the class 1 root certificate but also to 
the class 3 server certificate used by mail servers.

There are a substantial set of users who use (often their own) mail
servers that use certificates signed by CAcert class 3 certificate.

Any application should have easy was to add a CA which the user trusts,
totally independent of the situation wrt CAcert, which is also a reason
why I do not believe that reopening this particular bug is the right
thing to do.

The correct thing would be to request an easy way for a user to manage
her CA's for her applications.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232340

Title:
  CaCert Certificates not installed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/232340/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 913912] Re: Excessive CPU usage in syncdaemon

2013-08-09 Thread David Ayers
Actually forget that comment about removing 2 ';' it seems like a PEBAC
while trying to copy and paste.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913912

Title:
  Excessive CPU usage in syncdaemon

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-client/+bug/913912/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 913912] Re: Excessive CPU usage in syncdaemon

2013-08-09 Thread David Ayers
@John 
Thanks a lot for your reply!

I had to remove 2 ';' to make that find expression work but here is the
requested information:

ayers@schiefer:~$ dpkg -S offload_queue.py
python-ubuntuone-client: 
/usr/share/pyshared/ubuntuone-client/ubuntuone/syncdaemon/offload_queue.py
python-ubuntuone-client: 
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ubuntuone-client/ubuntuone/syncdaemon/offload_queue.py

ayers@schiefer:~$ ( find ~/.local/share/ubuntuone/shares/ -type d; u1sdtool 
--list-folders 2/dev/null | awk -v ORS=\0 '/subscribed=True/{print 
substr($0, 64)}' | xargs -0 -Ix find x -type d ) |wc -l
9736

(This is the default after I had commented my setting to increase the watchers. 
See bug #761578 )
ayers@schiefer:~$ sudo sysctl fs.inotify.max_user_watches
fs.inotify.max_user_watches = 8192

ayers@schiefer:~$ cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/trip_point_0_temp 
91000

If the temperature exceeds 91 degrees for more than a really short tome,
the system shuts down.

I don't know if there is a sysctl I can set that would slow down the CPU
earlier.  So I'm not sure how to get this CPU under control.  This is a
Dell Inspiron 1525 that came with Ubuntu preinstalled and is supported.
The only major change is that I have an SSD in it now.

ayers@schiefer:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo 
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 15
model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5450  @ 1.66GHz
stepping: 13
microcode   : 0xa3
cpu MHz : 1000.000
cache size  : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 2
apicid  : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov 
pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm 
constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor 
ds_cpl est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm dtherm
bogomips: 3325.14
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor   : 1
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 15
model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5450  @ 1.66GHz
stepping: 13
microcode   : 0xa3
cpu MHz : 1000.000
cache size  : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 1
cpu cores   : 2
apicid  : 1
initial apicid  : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov 
pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm 
constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor 
ds_cpl est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm dtherm
bogomips: 3325.35
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913912

Title:
  Excessive CPU usage in syncdaemon

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-client/+bug/913912/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 913912] Re: Excessive CPU usage in syncdaemon

2013-08-09 Thread David Ayers
I can confirm this issue with 12.04 LTS.

My CPU is overheating while the initialization is running.  I'm syncing
quite a few files (I increased my fs.inotify.max_user_watches to allow
me to sync about 150K of files/directories).

During synchronization the CPU temperature is between 80°-85° C but my
shortly spike to 93° (as reported by psensors and by
/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp) often this spike will lead to a
shutdown of the system.  Of course the whole procedure restart after
logging back in.  It takes about 40 minutes for the initialization to
finish, after which 1.5 GB virtual memory is used by the process of
which about 1 GB is resident.

I currently have to avoid any other activity on this system and insure
the system is cooled until initialization is finished, especially if
Deja-Dup starts running at the same time.

If wonder if a trace would help.
http://docs.python.org/2/library/trace.html
would editing the shebang line in  
/usr/lib/ubuntuone-client/ubuntuone-syncdaemon work?
Would that help to understand the issue to resolve it?
Or is the issue already well understood and just the way it is?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913912

Title:
  Excessive CPU usage in syncdaemon

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-client/+bug/913912/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 902166] Re: Excessive memory usage in syncdaemon

2013-07-02 Thread David Ayers
How many files are you syncing?
How did you measure the memory usage?

My syncdaemon is using quite a bit more memory - 'top' reports:
  PID USER  PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+  COMMAND
 3004 ayers 20   0 1582m 923m 151m S0 23.4  33:07.46 ubuntuone-syncd
yes, that's one and a half GB VM where nearly a full GB is resident.

I had to increase fs.inotify.max_user_watches to actually sync 150K
files/directories though.  Also starting up the sync-daemon takes about
45-60 minutes to register all those files, during which time on CPU is
constantly busy. (As I'm using and SSD the disk times seem negligible).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902166

Title:
  Excessive memory usage in syncdaemon

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-client/+bug/902166/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 761578] Re: handle reaching inotify max watches better

2013-01-16 Thread David Ayers
As the original reporter, I'd also suggest to inform the user about
hitting this limit with a pointer to the workaround.  I'm syncing about
40K+ files with Ubuntu One (10K+ directories) and if I forget to set
this value on one of those machines, U1 of course silently does not
sync those files that didn't get a watcher.  (I say silently since it
does report the issue in it's log file, but unless you are looking you
will most certainly miss it).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/761578

Title:
  handle reaching inotify max watches better

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/761578/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1080350] Re: Overheating AMD Turion II Dual-Core Mobile M500 ATI RV710Mobility Radeon HD 4300

2012-12-18 Thread David Ayers
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Summary changed:

- Overheating AMD Turion II Dual-Core Mobile M500 ATI RV710Mobility Radeon HD 
4300 
+ CPU Overheating with ATI driver

** Summary changed:

- CPU Overheating with ATI driver
+ CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon Mobility graphics

** Summary changed:

- CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon Mobility graphics
+ CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  CPU Overheating with ATI driver Radeon HD Mobility graphics

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 748080]

2012-12-03 Thread David Ayers
I've been regularly using:
echo low | sudo tee /sys/class/drm/card0/device/power_profile

I've am also using psensor to warn me if the temperature rises above
92°.  When 'idle' the temperature is at about 80°.  If the CPU is used
(merely starting eclipse and letting all the the startup validation
processes finish) it quickly rises to 88°.  If the usages is sustained
(rebuilding a java project) the temperature oscillates between 95° and
98°.  If I do anything else that adds to the load (ie. if the
temperature is 98° for short period of time), the system freezes, but
the everything remains on, fans and CPU temperature stays up.  I need to
turn off the notebook by keeping the power button pressed.

Note that this system overheats /with/ the low power profile.

Here are some general stats about this system, please let me know, if I
can provide further information:

HP Presario CQ61 320eg
AMD Turion(tm) II Dual-Core Mobile M500
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RV710 
[Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Series] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Linux schiefer 3.2.0-33-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 18 16:29:15 UTC 2012 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
ayers@schiefer:~$ lsmod|grep rad
radeon804503  2 
ttm76949  1 radeon
drm_kms_helper 46978  1 radeon
drm   241921  4 radeon,ttm,drm_kms_helper
i2c_algo_bit   13423  1 radeon

This started after the upgrading from Maverick.  I'm currently running
Precise with the 2D Unity desktop.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748080

Title:
  ATI card fan is always on with opensource radeon driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/748080/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1080350] [NEW] Overheating AMD Turion II Dual-Core Mobile M500 ATI RV710Mobility Radeon HD 4300

2012-11-18 Thread David Ayers
Public bug reported:

Ever since upgrading from Maverick (with GNOME Classic) to Precise
(using Unity 2D since using the default Unity makes the situation worse)
my note book regularly overheats with normal usage:

I've been regularly using:
echo low | sudo tee /sys/class/drm/card0/device/power_profile

I've am also using psensor to warn me if the temperature rises above
92°.  When 'idle' the temperature is at about 80°.  If the CPU is used
(merely starting eclipse and letting all the the startup validation
processes finish) it quickly rises to 88°.  If the usages is sustained
(rebuilding a java project) the temperature oscillates between 95° and
98°.  If I do anything else that adds to the load (ie. if the
temperature is 98° for short period of time), the system freezes, but
the everything remains on, fans and CPU temperature stays up.  I need to
turn off the notebook by keeping the power button pressed.

Note that this system overheats /with/ the low power profile.

Here are some general stats about this system, please let me know, if I
can provide further information:

HP Presario CQ61 320eg
AMD Turion(tm) II Dual-Core Mobile M500
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RV710 
[Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Series] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Linux schiefer 3.2.0-33-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 18 16:29:15 UTC 2012 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
ayers@schiefer:~$ lsmod|grep rad
radeon804503  2 
ttm76949  1 radeon
drm_kms_helper 46978  1 radeon
drm   241921  4 radeon,ttm,drm_kms_helper
i2c_algo_bit   13423  1 radeon

This started after the upgrading from Maverick.  I'm currently running
Precise with the 2D Unity desktop.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeon 1:6.14.99~git20111219.aacbd629-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-33.52-generic 3.2.31
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-33-generic x86_64
.tmp.unity.support.test.0:
 
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu14
Architecture: amd64
CompizPlugins: 
[core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,compiztoolbox,grid,resize,snap,vpswitch,move,mousepoll,wall,place,imgpng,gnomecompat,unitymtgrabhandles,regex,session,animation,fade,workarounds,scale,expo,ezoom,unityshell]
CompositorRunning: None
Date: Sun Nov 18 14:30:50 2012
DistUpgraded: 2012-04-29 09:57:42,118 DEBUG enabling apt cron job
DistroCodename: precise
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes,
GraphicsCard:
 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RV710 [Mobility Radeon HD 4300 Series] 
[1002:9552] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device [103c:3652]
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007)
MachineType: Hewlett-Packard Presario CQ61 Notebook PC
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.2.0-33-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/vg--hostname-lv--ubuntu ro vga=795 quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-ati
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-29 (203 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 10/10/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.bios.version: F.07
dmi.board.name: 3652
dmi.board.vendor: Quanta
dmi.board.version: 42.14
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Quanta
dmi.chassis.version: N/A
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrF.07:bd10/10/2009:svnHewlett-Packard:pnPresarioCQ61NotebookPC:pvr039210210D102:rvnQuanta:rn3652:rvr42.14:cvnQuanta:ct10:cvrN/A:
dmi.product.name: Presario CQ61 Notebook PC
dmi.product.version: 039210210D102
dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1.4
version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.32-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.2
version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.2
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.8
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.0-0ubuntu1.2
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 
1:6.14.99~git20111219.aacbd629-0ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.17.0-1ubuntu4.2
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:0.0.16+git20111201+b5534a1-1build2

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise referred-by-support running-unity ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  Overheating AMD Turion II Dual-Core Mobile M500 ATI RV710Mobility
  Radeon HD 4300

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1080350] Re: Overheating AMD Turion II Dual-Core Mobile M500 ATI RV710Mobility Radeon HD 4300

2012-11-18 Thread David Ayers
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #36438
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36438

** Also affects: xserver-xorg-driver-ati via
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36438
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080350

Title:
  Overheating AMD Turion II Dual-Core Mobile M500 ATI RV710Mobility
  Radeon HD 4300

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-driver-ati/+bug/1080350/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 607887] Re: hexedit press F1 for help doesn't work

2012-10-02 Thread David Ayers
This should probably be reassigned to gnome-terminal since hexedit
probably never gets notified of the F1 key.  gnome-terminal should have
preferences to disable it's own help an pass the F1 to the terminal.
There are preferences in gnome-terminal to manage keyboard shortcuts but
I haven't been able to figure out how gnome-terminal could be configured
to pass F1 to the tty.

But the only thing hexedit could do to workaround the issue is not to
use F1 for it's help... but something like ctrl-h?  Not sure if that's
reasonable.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607887

Title:
  hexedit press F1 for help doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hexedit/+bug/607887/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 179139] Re: Intel Wireless Restrictions: ipw2100, ipw2200 are not Free

2012-09-30 Thread David Ayers
I'm glad to accept that you have no personal interest in pursuing this.
That's fine since AFAIU you are not the sole maintainer of the linux-
firmware package.  Yet I do hope that maybe someone else from the Ubuntu
kernel-team may find interest in this.

Debian already splits all non-free firmware into seperate packages.  They then 
provide
http://packages.debian.org/de/sid/firmware-linux-nonfree
depending on all these separate packages, yet which also depends on the DSFG 
compliant firmware, which is combined in
http://packages.debian.org/de/sid/firmware-linux-free

What this report is asking for, is for Ubuntu to do the something
similar.  I (and possibly others) assumed that the Ubuntu split of
linux-firmware and linux-firmware-nonfree would mirror this.  But I
suppose that doesn't seem to be the case.  Yet I would expect it would
be easy for Ubuntu as a Debian derivative to build on the current Debian
infrastructure.

Fedora has explicitly exempted proprietary Firmware from the thier Free and 
Open Source Software policy. 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items so it may be that from the large 
distribution, Debian may be the only one insuring that proprietary firmware is 
not included in their main repository.

But indeed, if, as you suggest, this split were already done upstream
and upstream would provide seperate source packages, it would make it a
lot easier for any distribution to offer their users a free operating
system.

I doubt that asking any specific existing maintainer to do this extra
work will be helpful.  But if we could get someone (either from Debian,
from libre-kernel contributors or the many Debian/Ubuntu derivatives
which try to provide a Free Software distribution) to help Ben
Hutschings and David Woodhouse provide seperate upstream packages (or
host support to split the firmware for packaging), they may find it
acceptable and helpful for this group of users, who value free operating
systems.

Yet the fact remains this report is about this missing split in Ubuntu.
So please do not interpret it as a critique of your work (which is very
much appreciated!) if I reopen this report.  It is merely an
articulation of Ubuntu users' (and in my case canonical customers')
request for providing a free operating system.

Thank you for your time!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179139

Title:
  Intel Wireless Restrictions:  ipw2100, ipw2200 are not Free

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/179139/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 179139] Re: Intel Wireless Restrictions: ipw2100, ipw2200 are not Free

2012-09-30 Thread David Ayers
Hello Era,

AFAIU Unity https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity is more of a
desktop environment and has nothing to do with this issue.

There currently is no package named linux-firmware-free for Ubuntu on
launchpad to reopen any bug.  The Ubuntu packages are called linux-
firmware and linux-firmware-nonfree.

linux-firmware: This package provides firmware used by Linux kernel drivers.
linux-firmware-nonfree: This package provides non-free firmware used by Linux 
kernel drivers. Most of the firmware in this package is for television tuner 
cards. However, non-free firmware for other classes of devices are provided as 
well.

We assumed that these were maintained in sync and that linux-firmware
was only supposed to contain the free-software firmware while all
proprietary firmware should have went do linux-firmware-nonfree.  Based
on that assumption this report was opened, stating that the proprietary
intel firmware should be part of linux-firmware-nonfree instead of
linux-firmware.

But instead linux-firmware contains all firmware from the upstream
linux-firmware package, while linux-firmware-nonfree contains further
non-free firmware which is not in the linux-firmware upstream package.

Since this is not just a single misplaced firmware but linux-firmware
contains all firmware from upstream, including all the other proprietary
firmware, I believe that this report is the wrong place to track the
issue in, as it is specific to certain intel wireless firmware blobs.

Instead I would consider opening a new issue against the linux-firmware
package to address all non-free firmware.  Then possibly opening an
upstream report and link to it.  It may also be helpful to ask for the
linux-firmware-nonfree package to be renamed to linux-firmware-extra-
nonfree to hopefully avoid future confusion.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179139

Title:
  Intel Wireless Restrictions:  ipw2100, ipw2200 are not Free

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/179139/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 179139] Re: Intel Wireless Restrictions: ipw2100, ipw2200 are not Free

2012-09-27 Thread David Ayers
I just dowloaded linux-firmware from kernel.org.  The license clearly states:
Copyright (c) 2006-2012, Intel Corporation.
All rights reserved.

Redistribution.  Redistribution and use in binary form, without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
met:
...

This firmware really should be moved to linux-firmware-nonfree which is part of 
multiverse.
If it is significant enough that it should be available in restricted then a 
linux-firmware-restricted package in restricted should be considered.  But many 
of us rely on only Free Software/OSI Certified Licensed/DSFG free software in 
main.

Indeed a bug may have been fixed in the sense that the the obligations
of license are now met.  But this bug is about having this software in
the correct package.

Are there any objections in reopening this issue for both linux-firmware
and linux-firmware-nonfree?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179139

Title:
  Intel Wireless Restrictions:  ipw2100, ipw2200 are not Free

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/179139/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 179139] Re: Intel Wireless Restrictions: ipw2100, ipw2200 are not Free

2012-09-27 Thread David Ayers
Tim, the fact that the firmware was distributed without the necessary
notices at the time, was a real issue and that has indeed been resolved.
With the new licensing Debian, Ubuntu and others are in compliance with
respect to the obligations to the copyright holders.   The fact that the
firmware was originally distributed without the proper notices should
have probably been tracked in a different report.  Yet that's not the
issue this bug report is about.

Both Debian and Ubuntu provide separate repositories for proprietary
software as a service to their users, some of whom value using free
software systems and others that just enjoy the distribution.  This bug
report is about the service of providing this distinction, not the legal
obligation that has indeed been resolved. That is why a say the original
issue being addressed by this report hasn't been resolved.

Please consider reopening this report so that the firmware will be
placed in the correct package... be it in restricted or multiverse.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179139

Title:
  Intel Wireless Restrictions:  ipw2100, ipw2200 are not Free

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/179139/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 482597] Re: Empathy dialpad tones don't work

2012-09-24 Thread David Ayers
Hello Dawid,

I do not here the DTMF dial tone from empathy while it sends them... but
if I call my mailbox to leave a message and then I type numbers on the
dial pad and later I listen to the mailbox, then I do hear the DTMF dial
tones on the recording.  The quality isn't great, but the dial tones are
audible.

Cheers,
David

PS: I'm still on 12.04 btw...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482597

Title:
  Empathy dialpad tones don't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/482597/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 988286] Re: After upgrading from Ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 libvirt-bin does not start any more with --listen

2012-09-17 Thread David Ayers
It seems I have a similar issue... in my case it seems that the
certificate had expired.  Under Lucid, this didn't lead to libvirtd
refusing to start, but in Precise this caused startup to fail.  I'm not
sure whether that's an improvement but it would really have helped if
the syslog were more informative than simply spawning and failing
something like a dozen instances.

I'm just adding this for others searching the database and finding this
issue to be informed of another failure vector.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988286

Title:
  After upgrading from Ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04 libvirt-bin does not start
  any more with --listen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/988286/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 973552] Re: telepathy-logger crashed with SIGSEGV in _IO_vfprintf_internal()

2012-08-10 Thread David Ayers
I'm still seeing this crash.  What's the status of the rebuild?  It's
been about a month and this seems easily fixable.  Does someone specific
need to be informed?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973552

Title:
  telepathy-logger crashed with SIGSEGV in _IO_vfprintf_internal()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/telepathy-logger/+bug/973552/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1023470] Re: Document quick search isn't workink in Unity 2D

2012-07-15 Thread David Ayers
To me it seems to depend on whether the file name has non-ASCII
characters.  But I'm not 100% sure that thats the only criteria.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023470

Title:
  Document quick search isn't workink in Unity 2D

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1023470/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 918439] Re: Regression: Cheese stopped working on Oneiric on 064e:a118 Suyin Corp. in a Dell Mini 12 preinstalled with Ubuntu

2012-07-11 Thread David Ayers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 890503 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890503

This is fixed for me in Precise.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918439

Title:
  Regression: Cheese stopped working on Oneiric on 064e:a118 Suyin Corp.
  in a Dell Mini 12 preinstalled with Ubuntu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cheese/+bug/918439/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 890503] Re: [Oneiric] Cheese won't start (Unable to initialize Clutter: Unable to find suitable fbconfig for the GLX context)

2012-07-11 Thread David Ayers
I can confirm that this issue is fixed for me in Precise.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890503

Title:
  [Oneiric] Cheese won't start (Unable to initialize Clutter: Unable to
  find suitable fbconfig for the GLX context)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/clutter/+bug/890503/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 961611] Re: package-reporter shouldn't crash when sources.list{, .d/*} files can't be read

2012-07-10 Thread David Ayers
Yes... actually I have this setup for weeks already so there have been
several reboots since then.

I can test that the user can read the file via:
sudo -u landscape cat 
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/private-ppa.launchpad.net_commercial-ppa-uploaders_fluendo-plugins_ubuntu.list
which will display the contents.

Yet the package-reporter still crashes sporadically with permission
denied on that file.  Could it be that read permissions do not suffice?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961611

Title:
  package-reporter shouldn't crash when sources.list{,.d/*} files can't
  be read

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/961611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 961611] Re: package-reporter shouldn't crash when sources.list{, .d/*} files can't be read

2012-07-10 Thread David Ayers
Strangely if I try:
sudo -u landscape /usr/bin/landscape-package-reporter  echo OK
I see no crash and OK is printed... not sure what's different in the 
environment in which the process is started automatically.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961611

Title:
  package-reporter shouldn't crash when sources.list{,.d/*} files can't
  be read

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/961611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 961611] Re: package-reporter shouldn't crash when sources.list{, .d/*} files can't be read

2012-07-10 Thread David Ayers
I know next to nothing about C++ but I believe this is a symptom of a
programming error in apt:

The code in 
apt-pkg/sourcelist.cc

says:
   ifstream F(File.c_str(),ios::in /*| ios::nocreate*/);
   if (!F != 0)
  return _error-Errno(ifstream::ifstream,_(Opening %s),File.c_str());

but the C++ documentation I found says:
If the constructor is not successful in opening the file, the object is still 
created although no file is associated to the stream buffer and the stream's 
failbit is set (which can be checked with inherited member fail).
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/iostream/ifstream/ifstream/

So I believe that the the if case is arbitrarily failing due to type
promotion rules dependent on the address that is stored in F.

That would make this a bug in the apt package which is repeated a few
times in other places.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961611

Title:
  package-reporter shouldn't crash when sources.list{,.d/*} files can't
  be read

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/961611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 426191] Re: 'E:/etc/apt/sources.list wird geöffnet - ifstream::ifstream (13 Permission denied), E:Die Liste der Quellen konnte nicht gelesen werden.'

2012-07-10 Thread David Ayers
I have just commented in Bug #961611 that I believe this a bug in the way apt 
handles the C++ ifstream variables:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/961611/comments/14

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426191

Title:
  'E:/etc/apt/sources.list wird geöffnet - ifstream::ifstream (13
  Permission denied), E:Die Liste der Quellen konnte nicht gelesen
  werden.'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/426191/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 852003] Re: USC fails to launch in non-admin user account if there's a private PPA

2012-07-10 Thread David Ayers
I believe the error still exists.  I know next to nothing about C++ but
I believe this is a symptom of a programming error in apt:

The code in
apt-pkg/sourcelist.cc

says:
   ifstream F(File.c_str(),ios::in /*| ios::nocreate*/);
   if (!F != 0)
  return _error-Errno(ifstream::ifstream,_(Opening %s),File.c_str());

but the C++ documentation I found says:
If the constructor is not successful in opening the file, the object is still 
created although no file is associated to the stream buffer and the stream's 
failbit is set (which can be checked with inherited member fail).
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/iostream/ifstream/ifstream/

So I believe that the the if case is arbitrarily failing due to type
promotion rules dependent on the address that is stored in F.

That would make this a bug in the apt package which is repeated a few
times in other places. (i.e. other places is apt where the result of the
constructor is tested via if (!F != 0) rather than fail.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852003

Title:
  USC fails to launch in non-admin user account if there's a private PPA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/852003/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 852003] Re: USC fails to launch in non-admin user account if there's a private PPA

2012-07-10 Thread David Ayers
... (i.e. other places _in_ the apt package ...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852003

Title:
  USC fails to launch in non-admin user account if there's a private PPA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/852003/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 961611] Re: package-reporter shouldn't crash when sources.list{, .d/*} files can't be read

2012-07-10 Thread David Ayers
That's hard to do... but I will try when it happens. But I do still have the 
crash report which contains:
 Uid:   120 120 120 120
which matches:
~$ getent passwd landscape 
landscape:x:120:129::/var/lib/landscape:/bin/false

Of course the default Gid is landscape...

But I really really really believe this is the apt bug I described.

See:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/852003
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-apt/+bug/852003
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-tweak/+bug/856140
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-tweak/+bug/856144
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-tweak/+bug/923967
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/426191
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/258909

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961611

Title:
  package-reporter shouldn't crash when sources.list{,.d/*} files can't
  be read

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/961611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 852003] Re: USC fails to launch in non-admin user account if there's a private PPA

2012-07-10 Thread David Ayers
Well if I call:
sudo -u landscape /usr/bin/landscape-package-reporter
I don't get the error, but every now and then when it is invoked automatically 
I do see the crash.
(the last crash report is from:
Date: Mon Jul  9 10:38:26 2012
but I've had it a few times before.)

I get:
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/landscape-package-reporter']
Traceback:
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/landscape-package-reporter, line 10, in module
 main(sys.argv[1:])
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/landscape/package/reporter.py, line 
729, in main
 return run_task_handler(PackageReporter, args)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/landscape/package/taskhandler.py, 
line 267, in run_task_handler
 package_facade = AptFacade()
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/landscape/package/facade.py, line 
123, in __init__
 self._cache = apt.cache.Cache(rootdir=root)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apt/cache.py, line 102, in __init__
 self.open(progress)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apt/cache.py, line 149, in open
 self._list.read_main_list()
 SystemError: E:Opening 
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/private-ppa.launchpad.net_commercial-ppa-uploaders_fluendo-plugins_ubuntu.list
 - ifstream::ifstream (13: Permission denied)
UserGroups: admin libvirtd

yet:
-rw-r- 1 root admin 161 Jun 13 12:18 
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/private-ppa.launchpad.net_commercial-ppa-uploaders_fluendo-plugins_ubuntu.list

So it's not easily reproducible but it happens...
see: Bug #961611

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852003

Title:
  USC fails to launch in non-admin user account if there's a private PPA

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/852003/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 961611] Re: package-reporter shouldn't crash when sources.list{, .d/*} files can't be read

2012-07-10 Thread David Ayers
OK, I'm wrong about the C++ error.

I've been told:
The test is ok. !F is equivalent to F.fail() [1], which effectively
makes the test:

 if (F.fail() != false)

[1] http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/iostream/ios/operatornot/

See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
center/+bug/852003/comments/8

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961611

Title:
  package-reporter shouldn't crash when sources.list{,.d/*} files can't
  be read

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/961611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 961611] Re: package-reporter shouldn't crash when sources.list{, .d/*} files can't be read

2012-07-09 Thread David Ayers
These files contain privileged information.  So instead of changing the
access to 0664 I set the group to 'admin' and the mode to 0640:

 -rw-r- 1 root admin 161 Jun 13 12:18 
private-ppa.launchpad.net_commercial-ppa-uploaders_fluendo-plugins_ubuntu.list
-rw-r- 1 root admin 163 Jun 13 12:18 
private-ppa.launchpad.net_commercial-ppa-uploaders_world-of-goo_ubuntu.list

I have added the landscape user to the admin group:
 ayers@schiefer:~$ getent group admin
admin:x:119:ayers,landscape

Yet it seems that the landscape user still doesn't have read access to
these files as the crash still happens with the permission denied error
message. I suppose that the issue might be related to the fact that
process running as system users somehow do not have access to their
group privileges?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961611

Title:
  package-reporter shouldn't crash when sources.list{,.d/*} files can't
  be read

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape-client/+bug/961611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 724254] Re: Fails to play Vorbis (ogv) Videos from Wikipedia

2012-05-29 Thread David Ayers
Indeed! Thanks for the heads up.  This is fixed in both Lucid and
Precise.

** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724254

Title:
  Fails to play Vorbis (ogv) Videos from Wikipedia

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/724254/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1005296] [NEW] JNLP file from OSM errors out with Fatal: Read Error: Could not could not read or parse JNLP file

2012-05-27 Thread David Ayers
Public bug reported:

The same file does open JOSM on lucid.

The full error stack is:
net.sourceforge.jnlp.LaunchException: Fatal: Read Error: Could not read or 
parse the JNLP file. 
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher.fromUrl(Launcher.java:491)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:283)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.runtime.Boot.run(Boot.java:202)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.runtime.Boot.run(Boot.java:51)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.runtime.Boot.main(Boot.java:168)
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Can't connect to SOCKS proxy:Verbindungsaufbau 
abgelehnt
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.JNLPFile.openURL(JNLPFile.java:282)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.JNLPFile.init(JNLPFile.java:212)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.JNLPFile.init(JNLPFile.java:188)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.JNLPFile.init(JNLPFile.java:173)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.JNLPFile.init(JNLPFile.java:159)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher.fromUrl(Launcher.java:477)
... 5 more
Caused by: 
java.io.IOException: Can't connect to SOCKS proxy:Verbindungsaufbau abgelehnt
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.JNLPFile.openURL(JNLPFile.java:282)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.JNLPFile.init(JNLPFile.java:212)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.JNLPFile.init(JNLPFile.java:188)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.JNLPFile.init(JNLPFile.java:173)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.JNLPFile.init(JNLPFile.java:159)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher.fromUrl(Launcher.java:477)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:283)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.runtime.Boot.run(Boot.java:202)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.runtime.Boot.run(Boot.java:51)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at net.sourceforge.jnlp.runtime.Boot.main(Boot.java:168)

I will attempt to attach the josm.jnlp file.

This is most likely a duplicate of one of:
Bug #781819
Bug #905961
Bug #922294

or any of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6?field.searchtext=JNLPsearch=Searchfield.status%3Alist=NEWfield.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSEfield.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSEfield.status%3Alist=CONFIRMEDfield.status%3Alist=TRIAGEDfield.status%3Alist=INPROGRESSfield.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTEDfield.assignee=field.bug_reporter=field.omit_dupes=onfield.has_patch=field.has_no_package=

But I opened this one as I'm not sure whether some of them are actually
different issues.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: openjdk-6-jre 6b24-1.11.1-4ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun May 27 23:16:50 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007)
SourcePackage: openjdk-6
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-29 (28 days ago)

** Affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005296

Title:
  JNLP file from OSM errors out with Fatal: Read Error: Could not could
  not read or parse JNLP file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1005296/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1005296] Re: JNLP file from OSM errors out with Fatal: Read Error: Could not could not read or parse JNLP file

2012-05-27 Thread David Ayers
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005296

Title:
  JNLP file from OSM errors out with Fatal: Read Error: Could not could
  not read or parse JNLP file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1005296/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1005296] Re: JNLP file from OSM errors out with Fatal: Read Error: Could not could not read or parse JNLP file

2012-05-27 Thread David Ayers
Attached the file that triggers the issue on Precise yet work on Lucid.

** Attachment added: josm.jnlp file that causes the error
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1005296/+attachment/3166218/+files/josm.jnlp

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005296

Title:
  JNLP file from OSM errors out with Fatal: Read Error: Could not could
  not read or parse JNLP file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/1005296/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 999732] Re: evolutions preview pane crashes/currupts when previewing large mails

2012-05-24 Thread David Ayers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 865461 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865461

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 865461
   preview pane hangs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999732

Title:
  evolutions preview pane crashes/currupts when previewing large mails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/999732/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 865461] Re: preview pane hangs

2012-05-24 Thread David Ayers
I've opened bug 999732 for my issue as apport-collect asked me to open a
new bug.

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #676333
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=676333

** Also affects: evolution via
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=676333
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865461

Title:
  preview pane hangs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/865461/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 502849] Re: duplicate emails

2012-05-24 Thread David Ayers
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502849

Title:
  duplicate emails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/502849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   3   4   5   >