[Bug 557130] Re: Kernel module atl1c missing from installer image
This bug is a duplicate of bug #431307, first reported on 2009-09-17 and still open; it renders the distro uninstallable on many popular systems, is relatively easy to fix, yet it still was not fixed in the final lucid release, 7.5 months later... come on guys, this is frustrating. At any rate, there is a work-around: copy atl1c.ko from the lucid desktop ISO to your alternate installation media, or somewhere else that can be made accessible to the machine being installed. Roughly, mkdir /tmp/mount-1 mkdir /tmp/mount-2 sudo mount -t iso9660 -o ro,loop /your/path/to/ubuntu-10.04-desktop-amd64.iso /tmp/mount-1 sudo mount -t squashfs -o ro,loop /tmp/mount-1/casper/filesystem.squashfs /tmp/mount-2 cp -p /tmp/mount-2/lib/modules/2.6.32-21-generic/kernel/drivers/net/atl1c/atl1c.ko /your/path/to/mounted/alternate-install-media/ sudo umount /tmp/mount-2 sudo umount /tmp/mount-1 rmdir /tmp/mount-2 rmdir /tmp/mount-1 Then, when installing, switch to a different virtual-terminal (e.g. "Alt-F2"), and: insmod /cdrom/atl1c.ko ...then proceed with installation. -- Kernel module atl1c missing from installer image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557130 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 431307] Re: karmic-alternate miss atl1c and ath9k module
Also affects ASUS P5G41T-M LE motherboard. As a work-around, I had to copy the atl1c.ko file from a karmic desktop CD to the alternate install CD. -- karmic-alternate miss atl1c and ath9k module https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242089] Re: Inconsistent snprintf format specification parsing
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 221979 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221979 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 221979 Inconsistent snprintf format specification parsing -- Inconsistent snprintf format specification parsing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 221979] Re: Inconsistent snprintf format specification parsing
This problem still exists in 9.04 beta. The patch has been posted here for a year already, and it's trivial to see that it is indeed a good fix. If the reason that the patch hasn't been applied yet is that it's already been fixed upstream, then why aren't we using the newer upstream version? One way or the other, this is an easy one to fix and very annoying to remain broken. The bug hasn't even been assigned to anyone! Come on, guys. -- Inconsistent snprintf format specification parsing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221979 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
