[Bug 176125] Re: Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)

2011-01-27 Thread Derek Morr
"I guess best idea would be if some (recognised) IPv6 expert spoke up on
this topic."

Well, Ron Broersma did chime in :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176125

Title:
  Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2
  >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 176125] Re: Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)

2011-01-26 Thread Derek Morr
My enterprise is a large research university in North America. We
control University owned machines, but student-owned machines are a
different matter.

I'm not certain that filtering privacy addresses at the border is
sufficient. I'd need to check with our security office, but I suspect
we'd also need to block them for internal connections, which means
blocking them at the edge. I doubt that all of our network equipment can
filter based on specific bits in an IPv6 address. Like many large
organizations, we have a large installed base of equipment from multiple
vendors on various lifecycles. Some of this equipment is managed
centrally, but a significant portion is managed by other units
(colleges, departments, etc). I couldn't even begin to guess what
percentage of our routers, switches, and firewalls have this sort of
filtering ability.

We have thousands of networks at the university. It's not practical to
install NDPmon on each of them, as much as I might wish it were done.

I think if you were to poll the Internet2 IPv6 community, you'd find
many similar environments.

Let me flip the question around -- how many respondents manage networks
at large institutions ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176125

Title:
  Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2
  >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 176125] Re: Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)

2011-01-26 Thread Derek Morr
I frankly couldn't care less if someone knows my MAC address. The MAC
address of the laptop I'm typing on right now is  00:1e:c2:c0:52:e3.
What does that get you? Not much.

If you're concerned about being tracked across the Internet, your IP
address is probably the least of your concerns. Have you read the
articles about browser fingerprinting? Even if you disable cookies and
don't install Flash, you can still be identified pretty well. I find
that much more concerning that someone knowing if I'm on Wifi or wired
Ethernet, and the manufacturer of my NIC. Privacy addresses provide no
protection against tracking cookies or other spyware.

Privacy addresses don't deliver much security (or privacy, frankly), and
they make life much harder for enterprise admins. There's a significant
difference between chasing down a few power users who enable privacy
addresses -vs- having to reconfigure every machine (often manually).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176125

Title:
  Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2
  >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 176125] Re: Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)

2011-01-18 Thread Derek Morr
Erik, the issue isn't access control. It's logging and compliance. If
someone uses our network to break the law, we need to be able to
identify the responsible person. Privacy addresses are directly at odds
with this requirement. Leaving them off by default isn't a 100%
solution, but it helps a lot. Defaults matter.

Mathieu, why do you assume that enterprises will use DHCPv6? Some might
for some of their networks, but it doesn't make sense for all use cases.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176125

Title:
  Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2
  >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 176125] Re: Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)

2011-01-18 Thread Derek Morr
Philipp,

That's not what I said (that's what tonfa said in reply to my note). At
many higher education institutions, we have policies that we need to
know who is using any given IP address at any point in time. Privacy
addresses make this much, much harder. Yes, we can disable them on
managed machines, but not all machines on our network are managed. For
example, student laptops on wireless networks. So, the default setting
matters. Microsoft enables privacy addresses by default on Vista and 7,
and it is already creating problems for us. I've heard similar
complaints from several colleagues at other universities. Frankly,
privacy addresses do very little to enhance privacy and create
significant headaches for network administrators. Please, leave them
disabled by default.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176125

Title:
  Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2
  >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 176125] Re: Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2 >/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)

2009-04-10 Thread Derek Morr
RFC 4941, Section 3.6, says that temporary addresses should be disabled
by default.

Speaking from an enterprise network perspective, I very much do *not*
want to see privacy addresses enabled by default, as they can make
complying with our network security policies much more difficult.

-- 
Ubuntu should activate the IPv6 privacy extension by default (echo 2 
>/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/use_tempaddr)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176125
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 158582] Re: ifup will fail if IPv6 has been compiled in the kernel

2008-10-30 Thread Derek Morr
Malte - your patch seemed to work for me.

-- 
ifup will fail if IPv6 has been compiled in the kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs