[Bug 1582323] Re: Commissioning fails when competing cloud metadata resides on disk

2017-02-24 Thread DesktopMan
Is this fix available in the 16.04 LTS image used by MaaS? Commissioning
fails for me and I'm wondering if this is the reason.

"Can not apply stage config, no datasource found! Likely bad things to
come!"

"Failed to start Apply the settings specified in cloud-config"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582323

Title:
  Commissioning fails when competing cloud metadata resides on disk

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1582323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1648380] Re: cloud-init fails to find CloudSigma datasource with cloud-init 0.7.8-1-g3705bb5-0ubuntu1

2017-02-24 Thread DesktopMan
Might be the wrong place to ask, but:

I'm using Ubuntu MaaS, will this fix be available in the 16.04 LTS
images? Right now my nodes fail to commission which I believe comes from
this issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648380

Title:
  cloud-init fails to find CloudSigma datasource with cloud-init
  0.7.8-1-g3705bb5-0ubuntu1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1648380/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 228442] Re: KVM eats 100% CPU, Host Hardy64, Guest XP with more than 1 VCPU

2009-06-04 Thread DesktopMan
Not sure if more information is needed at this point, but this bug also affects 
me. Setup:
Jaunty 64bit
kvm 1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.1~ppa6
no acpi or apic
1 or 2 cpus, doesn't matter

>From what Dustin says ACPI + XP has been fixed? Am I understanding that
correctly?

-- 
KVM eats 100% CPU, Host Hardy64, Guest XP with more than 1 VCPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228442
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 343781] Re: nvidia-based Mac Mini (Macmini3, 1) won't reboot (but will halt)

2009-05-16 Thread DesktopMan
Same issue, Ubuntu 9.04 i386, 2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr
17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux. Since the mac 2009 hardware is
virtually identical for all configurations except for ram and harddrive
it likely happens all configurations.

-- 
nvidia-based Mac Mini (Macmini3,1) won't reboot (but will halt)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343781
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 208551] Re: mdadm with Raid5 stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2009-01-08 Thread DesktopMan
I do not have this setup anymore (9+ months, needed it operational), but
there have been other people reporting the same problem more recently.
Hopefully one of them will be able to confirm.

-- 
mdadm with Raid5 stuck in uninterruptable sleep
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208551
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 208551] Re: mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2008-08-21 Thread DesktopMan
I had to swap to Debian as this bug made the server useless. I haven't 
had any deadlocks here yet, but it might still apply for all I know.

Or is Debian using different code? I'm running testing, on 2.6.25-2

I am happy someone eventually identified the cause though.

Christian

Colin King wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've applied commit 6ed3003c19a96fe18edf8179c4be6fe14abbebbc and built
> for testing linux - 2.6.24-20.39cking4 package - you can download the
> package from my PPA at: https://launchpad.net/~colin-king/+archive
> 
> Please can you test this fix and let me know if it works so that we can
> add it to the next release of Hardy.
> 
> To test, add the following lines to your apt sources.list:
> 
> deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/colin-king/ubuntu hardy main
> deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/colin-king/ubuntu hardy main
> 
> alternatively, follow the instructions at: https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04
> /add-applications/C/extra-repositories-adding.html
> 
> Thanks, Colin
>

-- 
mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208551
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 208551] Re: mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2008-05-06 Thread DesktopMan
Not sure if it is related, might be. I honestly gave up on it after
concluding that the problem was too erratic and virtually impossible for
me to debug. If I remember correctly I also got messages about the SATA
link going down, then reset and back up.

-- 
mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208551
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 198871] Re: Jmicron AHCI controller probs...

2008-03-30 Thread DesktopMan
Exactly the same happens to me. Asus X38 Maximus formula, ICH9R. If the
jmicron controller is enabled I get the same errors as you do.
Ironically I can use the IDE part of the jmicron controller, but it even
prevents other SATA controllers (like the onboard AHCI controller)
working.

-- 
Jmicron AHCI controller probs...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198871
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 208551] Re: mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2008-03-30 Thread DesktopMan
Was copying from a file set up with losetup + cryptsetup on a raid5
array (the one above) to a raid6 array, all of which with XFS. During
this copy I ran mdadm --examine --scan, and the raid5 crashed (the one I
was reading from), giving me input/output errors. md device is fine on
the other hand, and remounting (the read only) filesystem was no
problem. dmesg output:

[131405.242868] xfs_force_shutdown(dm-1,0x1) called from line 420 of file 
/build  
  
/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c.  Return address = 0x883cdf59
[131405.242892] Filesystem "dm-1": I/O Error Detected.  Shutting down 
filesystem  
  : dm-1
[131405.242932] Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s)
[131405.242958] xfs_force_shutdown(dm-1,0x1) called from line 420 of file 
/build  
  
/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c.  Return address = 0x883cdf59

Not sure if it's related to the first post or not. Any input would be
appreciated.

-- 
mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208551
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 208551] Re: mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2008-03-28 Thread DesktopMan
mdadm -D returned after a couple of minutes, at which point it started
writing again. During the period it was running nothing was written.

-- 
mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208551
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 208551] Re: mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2008-03-28 Thread DesktopMan
Sigh. Spoke too soon. Ran mdadm -D while it was beeing copied to, hanged
again. 2TB transferred. Guess it's directly related to the number of
processes that access to the device. Won't be able to restart it until
tomorrow, but I can try any suggestions on the hanged system.

-- 
mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208551
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 208551] [NEW] mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep

2008-03-28 Thread DesktopMan
Public bug reported:

Description:Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
Release:8.04

Linux ubuntu-beta 2.6.24-12-server #1 SMP Wed Mar 12 22:58:36 UTC 2008
x86_64 GNU/Linux

mdadm:
  Installed: 2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3ubuntu3

xfsprogs:
  Installed: 2.9.4-2

Raid 5 on five 1TB drives, set up as follows:

mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=5 --raid-devices=5 /dev/sd[b,c,d,e,f]
mkfs.xfs /dev/md0
mount /dev/md0 /mnt/drive

md0 : active raid5 sdf[4] sde[3] sdd[2] sdc[1] sdb[0]
  3907049984 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [U]

The drives are connected to a 5-1 port multiplier again connected to a
2-port SiI 3132 based pciexpress sata controller. Problem does not seem
to be related to this, as I can write/read to the drives individually
without any trouble.

Copying data do this partition results in a permanent lock on several
processes related to it, getting stuck in the D(+) state. Happened four
times in a row after 10-40 GB had been copied. I can't kill any of the
processes, nor am I able to reboot, have to power cycle.

There are no messages related to it in dmesg or any of the logs, as far
as the system is concerned nothing is wrong. After power cycling the
array starts rebuilding (as it should), but this rebuild also stops
because of the same error.

Problem seems very related to this:

http://www.issociate.de/board/post/471929/2.6.24-rc6_reproducible_raid5_hang.html

As suggested by this thread, I tried to increase stripe_cache_size.
Setting it to 4096 seems to have solved my hang, as I have at the time
of writing this copied 1.7TB without error.

http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2007/11/8/397727

If this is the same problem and I'm reading it right, it seems like it's
supposed to be fixed already. Not sure though.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: hang hardy heron mdadm raid5 stuck xfs

-- 
mdadm, Raid5 and XFS stuck in uninterruptable sleep
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208551
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 110304] Re: Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-06-16 Thread DesktopMan
Beeing somewhat new to Linux I'm not sure what constitutes a kernel
crash. Everything locks up completely, sysrq does not work. No output to
the monitor.

-- 
Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 110304] Re: Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-06-08 Thread DesktopMan
I can confirm that everything works as it should on 2.6.17-11

I haven't come any closer to figuring out what happens on 2.6.20-15 and
2.6.20-16. Sometimes it crashes on mount, sometimes it can work for
hours.

-- 
Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 110304] Re: Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan
Yes I know everything seems fine now, but at boot it refused to start, I
had to manually re-add one of the drives and mdadm --run it.

The crash has happened twice. I'm currently checking if it also occurs
with the old kernel (2.6.17-11)

The reason I upgraded in the first place was to prevent data corruption
on raid5 with cryptsetup, as reported for kernels < 2.6.19.

-- 
Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 110304] Re: Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan
It crashed after having been up for atleast some hours. (crashed while I
was sleeping) The raid array was mounted, but as I said I don't really
know if it's related or not.

-- 
Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 110304] Re: Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan

** Attachment added: "Output from mdadm --examine /dev/sd*"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7411695/drives.txt

-- 
Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 110304] Re: Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan

** Attachment added: "Output from mdadm --query --detail /dev/md0"
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/7411694/detail.txt

-- 
Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 107080] Re: Wrong RAID UUID on PATA RAID5 partitions after Feisty Upgrade

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan
I've opened up another bug for my other troubles, as they might not be
entirely related to the UUID problem:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/110304

-- 
Wrong RAID UUID on PATA RAID5 partitions after Feisty Upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 107080] Re: Wrong RAID UUID on PATA RAID5 partitions after Feisty Upgrade

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan
This also happened to me. I managed to start it by changing the UUID in
mdadm.conf to what was reported by mdadm --examine. I still have issues
though, hard crashes etc.

-- 
Wrong RAID UUID on PATA RAID5 partitions after Feisty Upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/107080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 110304] Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5

2007-04-26 Thread DesktopMan
Public bug reported:

Running Linux 2.6.20-15-server #2 SMP 32bit

First, I also had the "UUID of raid devices have changed after upgrade
to Feisty", which I "fixed" by editing mdadm.conf with the new id. After
that I started the array which rebuilt itself.

I thought everything was allright, until a hard crash. I rebooted, array was 
dirty AND degraded, and I had to manually re-add a drive. (mind you, the drive 
that faults is random, so there arn't any real bad drive here)
Even display image disappears when it crashes.

I don't really know where to look for information on the crash, or even
what is causing it, all I know it was not happening in 6.10 and might be
mdadm/raid5 related. I'm also using cryptsetup for 128 bit AES
encryption on top of this raid5.

** Affects: Ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed


** Tags: crash feisty mdadm

** Description changed:

- Running Linux desk-dfs 2.6.20-15-server #2 SMP 32bit
+ Running Linux 2.6.20-15-server #2 SMP 32bit
  
  First, I also had the "UUID of raid devices have changed after upgrade
  to Feisty", which I "fixed" by editing mdadm.conf with the new id. After
  that I started the array which rebuilt itself.
  
  I thought everything was allright, until a hard crash. I rebooted, array was 
dirty AND degraded, and I had to manually re-add a drive. (mind you, the drive 
that faults is random, so there arn't any real bad drive here)
  Even display image disappears when it crashes.
  
  I don't really know where to look for information on the crash, or even
  what is causing it, all I know it was not happening in 6.10 and might be
  mdadm/raid5 related. I'm also using cryptsetup for 128 bit AES
  encryption on top of this raid5.

** Tags added: crash feisty mdadm

-- 
Feisty crash possibly related to mdadm/raid5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 105761] Re: No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn

2007-04-11 Thread DesktopMan
Driver from http://www.nvidia.com works fine, also seem to fix the
lcd/crt swap issue. *Happy*

-- 
No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105761
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 105761] Re: No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn

2007-04-11 Thread DesktopMan
Thanks that gave me a bit more info to work with. Basically it says
"Failed to initialize the NVIDIA graphics device PCI:1:0:0. no screens
found."

This can't be the original problem though, as I didn't get any display
image without the nvidia driver either.

I reverted back to "nv" (was using "nvidia") to see if it fails in a
different way, and was to surprised to see that it boots fine. Problem
solved I guess, as for the reason I have no idea. It does some funny
swapping of the monitors too, it boots on the CRT, XFCE loads on the
LCD, and if I go to a console it swaps to the CRT again :P

Thanks! Now I just have to get the nvidia driver working

-- 
No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105761
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 105761] Re: No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn

2007-04-11 Thread DesktopMan
Forgot to mention that I'm using the 64 bit version of Ubuntu.

** Description changed:

- I tried installing Ubuntu Feisty Beta (Xubuntu edition), but I just get
+ I tried installing Ubuntu Feisty Beta (Xubuntu edition), but I just got
  a black screen on the graphical installer. I then downloaded the
  alternate install CD which worked fine. After GRUB is displayed I get
- nothing; everthing is black.
+ nothing; everything is black.
  
  Computer is working fine, as I installed SSH from the recovery console,
  rebooted, and managed to log in.
  
  I've tried the following steps:
  
  syslog/dmesg doesn't have much of interest (though I don't know what I should 
look for)
  All cables etc have been tested. I also connected a second monitor to the 
other dvi port in case it defaulted to that one.
  I tried installing nvidia-glx, but it shouldn't matter for console, and it 
didn't
  I also tried swapping from "nv" to "vesa", no go (again, shouldn't matter for 
console)
  
  Hardware:
  Intel Core 2 Quad 3.2 ghz
  GeForce 8800
  EVGA nForce 680i mainboard
  Soundblaster X-Fi
  2x Western Digital Raptor 150 gbyte on nForce ata controller

** Tags added: display feisty

-- 
No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105761
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 105761] No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn

2007-04-11 Thread DesktopMan
Public bug reported:

I tried installing Ubuntu Feisty Beta (Xubuntu edition), but I just get
a black screen on the graphical installer. I then downloaded the
alternate install CD which worked fine. After GRUB is displayed I get
nothing; everthing is black.

Computer is working fine, as I installed SSH from the recovery console,
rebooted, and managed to log in.

I've tried the following steps:

syslog/dmesg doesn't have much of interest (though I don't know what I should 
look for)
All cables etc have been tested. I also connected a second monitor to the other 
dvi port in case it defaulted to that one.
I tried installing nvidia-glx, but it shouldn't matter for console, and it 
didn't
I also tried swapping from "nv" to "vesa", no go (again, shouldn't matter for 
console)

Hardware:
Intel Core 2 Quad 3.2 ghz
GeForce 8800
EVGA nForce 680i mainboard
Soundblaster X-Fi
2x Western Digital Raptor 150 gbyte on nForce ata controller

** Affects: Ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
No display image on Ubuntu Feisty Fawn
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105761
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs