[Bug 1718679] Re: Upgrade to 4.13.0-11.12 in artful amd64 VM breaks display on wayland
If you blacklist the vboxvideo driver, you lose the full-screen and the hardware acceleration. You forgot to mention that. I recommend pressing RIGHT SHIFT and get into GRUB menu, choose kernel 4.12 and then install synaptic, uninstall kernel 4.13 and lock version 4.12 until this is resolved. This bug appeared today around here. It's a bug in the kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718679 Title: Upgrade to 4.13.0-11.12 in artful amd64 VM breaks display on wayland To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1718679/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277903] Re: Missing Operating System [message at boot]
I recently purchased a GA-990XA-UD3 and experienced this problem. This is an UEFI board, with support for Legacy boot, etc. I had no problems creating a TAILS persistent USB flash disk, within TAILS DVD. It booted normally from USB. But then, when I used a Sandisk Cruzer Blade (another flash drive) to create a standard Ubuntu 15.04 Live USB, using the tool called "Universal Boot Installer", following the right steps. Everything in place, FAT32, etc, and to my surprise "Missing operating system". I found out that the flash drive had two configurations, when investigating through gparted, and fdisk. 1) The flash drive was as GPT partition. 2) It had the msftdata flag. I don't know WHICH one of those could have caused the problem. I think this happened to this flash pendrive when I was playing around with "Windows 8 Disk Management" tools. What I did was to completely wipe the flash drive, with gparted, recreating the partition table as msdos, and formatting as FAT32. Using "Universal USB Installer" recreated the system, and then I found out it also flagged the drive as "boot, lba". I hope this helps, if you're stuck. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277903 Title: Missing Operating System [message at boot] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/277903/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 591823] Re: File descriptor \d+ (\S+) leaked on lvs invocation.
I made a switch to LVM and I noticed this warning today. Quantal Quetzal here, clean install. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591823 Title: File descriptor \d+ (\S+) leaked on lvs invocation. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/aptitude/+bug/591823/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 894204] Re: Menu group File Edit View... delays to appear after a created window is rendered, in gnome-shell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915241 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915241 I'm sorry... is it fixed? Is it laying around proposed repos or was it deployed directly to normal updates? Last time I checked I haven't got any update concerning this package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894204 Title: Menu group File Edit View... delays to appear after a created window is rendered, in gnome-shell To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appmenu-gtk/+bug/894204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 894204] Re: Menu group File Edit View... delays to appear after a created window is rendered, in gnome-shell
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 915241 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915241 well, that is of *GREAT* help... sorry to be naggy and ironic, but what's the point not backporting this to Oneiric? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894204 Title: Menu group File Edit View... delays to appear after a created window is rendered, in gnome-shell To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appmenu-gtk/+bug/894204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 894204] Re: Menu group File Edit View... delays to appear after a created window is rendered, in gnome-shell
Hey Jeremy, thanks for your input. Actually, I don't know if this is happening only on our 2 machines (giowck's and mine) or it is actually happening every gnome-shell installation of oneiric. This is critical, I'm glad you have spotted the problem. Hope this is fixed really soon, because I'm on arch, and I find it a pain to recommend it to users. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894204 Title: Menu group File Edit View... delays to appear after a created window is rendered, in gnome-shell To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appmenu-gtk/+bug/894204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 894204] [NEW] Menu group File Edit View... delays to appear after a created window is rendered, in gnome-shell
Public bug reported: When you open any window in gnome-shell compilation from ubuntu oneiric repos, there is a delay for the menu group in window to appear. A menu group of a window is the File Edit View Tools, etc that is below the title bar. The behaviour in gnome-shell may or may not be releated to the global menu configurations in the system. My hardware is: ATI HD 3200 RS780 Using radeon open source driver. I have experienced this on Ubuntu 11.10 and Kubuntu 11.10 both fully updated to this day. All latest packages related to gnome-shell. How to reproduce: 1) Make the universe repository available. 2) Install gnome-shell via: sudo apt-get install sudo gnome-shell Login using GNOME and try to open a few applications, like Nautilus, etc. Notice that the Menu group window has a tiny delay, but really annoying. ** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: delay gnome-shell menus window -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894204 Title: Menu group File Edit View... delays to appear after a created window is rendered, in gnome-shell To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/894204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 465485] Re: Split Tracks burn to disc in reverse order
I can confirm this bug: Ways to reproduce it Select a FLAC or MP3 file to burn as Audio CD. Select Split Track... - If you split the track by number of parts, the FIRST part will be the last track. All other tracks counting from second will be ordered correctly. - If you split the track by fixed time lenght, you get the same behaviour above, PLUS, the probability of getting STATIC NOISE TRASH AUDIO on all tracks (a problem on decoding side I believe). - Generally it doesn't find any silence when you want to have it split a cd image with silences between tracks. - And I observed that playing back the track in this dialog is broken... This happening to me on : Ubuntu 11.04 + All updates applied up to 14/Aug/2011. This is also happening in Fedora 15 with Gnome Shell, with all updates applied, as of 15/Aug/2011. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/465485 Title: Split Tracks burn to disc in reverse order To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/465485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459647] Re: Cannot change mouse cursor theme when compiz is enabled
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 86184 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/86184 Bug present in Natty. Workaround mentioned on post #45 no longer works in this version. Always coming up like crap keeping strong against toilet flush. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459647 Title: Cannot change mouse cursor theme when compiz is enabled -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450443] Re: gnome-appearance-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in cursor_size_scale_value_changed_cb()
Annoying bug, present in Maverick Release Candidate. Appearance Settings crash if you follow this procedure: 1) Open Appearance Settings. 2) Change the theme to a theme which has titlebar buttons to the right (NewWave, e.g.) 3) Click Customize... 4) Change Controls to Radiance (or Ambiance) 5) Change Window Borders to Radiance (or Ambiance). 6) Set the right icons for Radiance or Ambiance (Mono-Light or Mono-Dark respectively) 7) Select the Mouse Pointer to be DMZ-White and try to move the slider to increase cursor size... and BANG, you crashed. -- gnome-appearance-properties crashed with SIGSEGV in cursor_size_scale_value_changed_cb() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
Upon a clean install from Ubuntu 10.04.1, I have not seen this bug come up with same configuration conditions as of before. Could we consider this fixed released? -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 588551] Re: Automatic font color is now grey instead of black
Stupid bug, been there for quite some time. Please fix this for Maverick. -- Automatic font color is now grey instead of black https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588551 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459647] Re: Cannot change mouse cursor theme when compiz is enabled
I find this bug of a certain critical level, please fix this for Maverick. -- Cannot change mouse cursor theme when compiz is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 551013] Re: ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display crisply
The Softpedia workaround fix worked for me. Don't know *WHY* this is marked as Fix Released. I have 10.04.1 from a fresh install and updates done, and this bug was still coming up. (The remaster for 10.04.1 was released days after this fix). -- ubuntu-logo on VGA fb (as with nvidia or fglrx binary drivers) does not display crisply https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459647] Re: Cannot change mouse cursor theme when compiz is enabled
I want to confirm that workaround #45 worked BEAUTIFULLY for me. I know it's kinda of a hard work solution, etc, but this bug was DRIVING ME INSANE. And look, it's just caused by a typo. If you are going to do this workaround, don't forget to LOCK PACKAGE after installing your modified one. You can do that in Synaptic - Package - Lock Version. -- Cannot change mouse cursor theme when compiz is enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
* * * I JUST HIT THIS BUG * * * Yes, I just did it... I have bought a new SEAGATE HDD, part number ST3500418AS. Formatted as ext4, with / (40GB), swap (5GB), /home (220GB) and ntfs (220GB). I installed ubuntu 10.04 and installed all updates. Then I downloaded the ISO for 10.04.1 via Transmission bit-torrent client. I burned the CD with Brasero. Upon installation, it stuck in Ubuntu screen. Told it to check the CD and there were errors. For my surprise, the ISO file MD5SUM was mismatching in the ext4 partition. Then I turned on Transmission again and made it RECHECK the file, the file got the correct MD5SUM. I believe I have hit this bug just now, because I was using ext3 for my home partition in my previous HDD. ext4 only for root partition. Now, problems have arised a couple of minutes JUST AFTER a ISO download and a fresh formatted ext4. I would consider not marking this bug as invalid. -- in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 453579] Re: in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4
I believe the bug title has been changed once or twice, but let me re- quote here what Scott reported: There are worrying reports of filesystem corruption on ext4 in karmic. Scott says: 12:36 Keybuk this whole ext4 thing is worrying me 12:36 Keybuk I just downloaded an iso image, md5sum didn't match 12:36 Keybuk downloaded it into an ext3 partition, matched just fine 12:59 Keybuk and I know mvo has seen bugs with corrupted .debs in /var/cache/apt/archives 12:59 Keybuk which seems to imply its any file large enough to use lots of extents Well, that's exactly what happened on a fresh Lucid install, using ext4 partition. It may be neither an issue with ext4 itself, nor an issue with kernel version or patch. I think this is related to Transmission application. Because reports are that the corruption takes place when torrents are downloaded. And this is what exactly happened. In some ways it may be that Transmission is not handling ext4 well. And it's very subtle, since a file recheck on finished torrents may just reconscrut the proper MD5SUM. -- in-place corruption of large files *without fsck or reboot* reported with linux 2.6.31-14.46 on ext4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453579 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
I think I have this bad block for a year now... the thing is that I would never write much data on this disk. The problem started when the headers actually started to cross over this spot, since I almost filled the disk a couple of times. I never cared to make a full surface scan using the factory tool from SAMSUNG. Neither cared to do this with fsck. I've always relied on fsck partial checks, and I think when the thing starts going really bad you get warned. Otherwise, you don't. So, download the factory surface scan app from your HDD website company, and do a full scan. It may take an hour depending how large it is (40 minutes for this 160GB). One thing for sure is that I will never be buying SAMSUNG hard drives again. I remember someone said to me that they were a so-so hard disk brand, and my previous disk was a Seagate Spinpoint in 2004 which I believe it is still kicking ass for someone I sold to. Western Digital made the RMA record for me, counting 3 RMA'ed drives in 2 years. So I stopped buying from them too. I am gonna buy a Seagate 500GB. However, I am gonna low-level format this problematic drive and see if this bad block can be marked away. At least I can still use it on a spare machine. -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Hi there, libata.noacpi=1 seems to have no side-effects... the only kernel switch that had a side effect was libata.force=norst which prevents soft and hard link resettings. If you have that switch on, when this bug comes up, there is a system lock down (because obviously the kernel prevented the soft hard resetting.) Other switches had no effect, and I gave up trying. I am furious about AMD SB700... but M3A78-EM is a good board. I think your notebook uses Intel chipset, and it's funny that it's also occurring with Seagate. I may replace the SAMSUNG drive first, we see how it goes (I need a larger one anyway). -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
I just performed a full test in this hard drive and ESTOOL returned a LBA 287034602 Bad Sector. Now I wonder if this is because the hardware had influence on the test itself, or if it is a real bad sector. Guess I will have to do one more test. -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Concluded the second test, BAD BLOCK confirmed, at the same spot. Looks to me this is the trouble maker, and this made me look ridiculous... I was believing that fsck would grasp any inconsistencies or bad blocks upon boot up, silly me, it just does partial check-ups. The Samsung's ESTOOL utility ended up my rage quest against AMD SB700 and Samsung themselves. Guess it's time for a backup and a badblocks -svw /dev/sda3 -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Ok, tried different and combined things, like libata.noacpi=1, libata.force=noncq,norst being that this last one was to block the soft and hard resetting, which eventually cause the whole system to crash and kernel panic for the first opportunity this bug came up. Now I am hopeless... I can tell that nothing in the realm of what a user can do will solve this. At least I got to a conclusion. So what you guys advise... Do I trash my SAMSUNG drive, along with my trust in this company... or Do I trash my ASUS M3A78-EM equipped with SB700 chipset... -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
I may try to go back to kernel 2.6.24.7, by the time Hardy Heron was released. This bug got introduced right after Intrepid Ibex, so I am gonna try Hardy Heron-time kernel. Stock 2.6.24.7 in ArchLinux. -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Added option in kernel, In my current GRUB (Arch): kernel /boot/vmlinuz26 root=/dev/sda1 ro nomodeset libata.noacpi=1 The option you might want to test: libata.noacpi=1 So far no hang ups. I still get these messages in dmesg (without any symptom): ata3: softreset failed (device not ready) ata3: applying SB600 PMP SRST workaround and retrying ata5: softreset failed (device not ready) ata5: applying SB600 PMP SRST workaround and retrying ata5: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) And this ones after dmesg is finished: ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133 ata3: EH complete We'll see if this keeps this bug quiet. -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Back. Changing the cables did not work. I may consider some few options to the kernel such as turning off some ACPI options. Here is a list of what I did WITHOUT SUCCESS: [X] TURNED HDPARM OFF [X] CHANGED CABLE [X] EXPERIMENTED AHCI RAID MODES [X] DISABLED NCQ [X] COMPILED KERNEL WITH CONFIG_SATA_PMP DISABLED [X] TRYING NOW LIBATA.FORCE=1.5GBPS [X] CHANGED CABLE ROUTES -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
I have changed cables, but I was stubborn and stuck it in the same SATA port. I am going to change this. I don't think it's going to work, but I will try, after I test kernel parameter libata.force=1.5Gbps - UNFORTUNATELY, CONFIG_SATA_PMP=n *DOES NOT WORK* to fix this issue... it is only a rumour in some Fedora forum I read. But I did manage to compile a brand new kernel with that option turned off. Minutes later, there was the system hanging up again! Here is a list of what I did: [X] TURNED HDPARM OFF [X] CHANGED CABLE [X] EXPERIMENTED AHCI RAID MODES [X] DISABLED NCQ [X] COMPILED KERNEL WITH CONFIG_SATA_PMP DISABLED [X] TRYING NOW LIBATA.FORCE=1.5GBPS [ ] - to be done - try different route. -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
libata.force=1.5Gbps DIDN'T WORK as well... Changed the cables to different routes... SATA1 - SATA2 SATA2 - SATA3 -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
libata.force=noncq --- no go. Problem persists even with ncq being turned off. Next step now is to configure a new kernel through the ABS method, and without PMP option enabled. I'll let you guys know. -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Ok, after biting the bullet, I called it a day again... everything I wrote before about fglrx, google-chrome, flash player is crap... meaning that it was a huge coincidence... Forget also BIOS settings, RAID, AHCI, and stuff like that, coz this is only in the kernel... I have dumped Ubuntu 10.04 and moved on to Archlinux. You know, with this one, you need to dig things deep... very deep... I'm not saying that Ubuntu is not good... no, in fact, is the best distro around... but I was kinda missing the do-yourself approach for a long time now but I still have a Ubuntu live pendrive for other tasks. Turns out that this bug is also present in Archlinux current kernel. And it manifests this way: ata3: softreset failed (device not ready) ata3: applying SB600 PMP SRST workaround and retrying ata3: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) This bug is surely related to the AMD SB600/700 controller mixed with certain hard disks (Samsung, mine). Like I said some previous posts... something to do with the kernel configuration CONFIG_SATA_PMP, some say that if you turn it off, this bug stops. I have yet to test this in Arch. You know, it's hard to compile a kernel in Ubuntu, following the traditional way and at the same time keeping all things together without breaking the package manager or something. In a similar fashion you need to be careful in Arch too, even though you can easily compile the traditional way, you need to properly create kernel headers package, if you, like me, use the fglrx beast, because it wants to compile a new module every new installed kernel. But if there is a way to avoid all this kernel mambo-jambo, I am gonna try it first: I have turned off ncq in my system by adding this line to GRUB kernel paramenters: libata.force=noncq I am currently testing this with no errors so far, next time I come here, it will be with another parameter. In the meanwhile, CONFIG_SATA_PMP may be your next adventure... -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Ok, now I have reached the point where nothing really works for this matter, except the kernel compiling step which I didn't try. In some forum I found this: all you need to is that, re-compile your kernel with CONFIG_SATA_PMP=n (default is CONFIG_SATA_PMP=y) Can anyone confirm if this could be possible? -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397096] Re: ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s
I have an ASUS motherboard and there is the SATA configuration in the BIOS. I have changed the SATA controller mode to RAID mode (there is IDE and SATA mode). I have done this, and it worked, even with one drive. The BIOS does not give many details about this... [0.942521] ahci :00:11.0: AHCI 0001.0100 32 slots 6 ports 3 Gbps 0x3f impl RAID mode I get a few lines in dmesg, seems that the AHCI controller is now in action. I did this because I was fed up last night, the computer started to halt every 2 minutes, literally. After I set this to RAID, it stopped. Let's see if that works. I am confused now, isn't RAID supposed to work with only 2 drives? -- ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
I have an ASUS motherboard and there is the SATA configuration in the BIOS. I have changed the SATA controller mode to RAID mode (there is IDE and SATA mode). I have done this, and it worked, even with one drive. The BIOS does not give many details about this... [ 0.942521] ahci :00:11.0: AHCI 0001.0100 32 slots 6 ports 3 Gbps 0x3f impl RAID mode I get a few lines in dmesg, seems that the AHCI controller is now in action. I did this because I was fed up last night, the computer started to halt every 2 minutes, literally. After I set this to RAID, it stopped. Let's see if that works. I am confused now, isn't RAID supposed to work with only 2 drives? -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
What a killer bug... drives me crazy... I will wait till 10.04.1 is out, and then make a clean install on new ext4 partitions... But I hope it's fixed by that time. -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Did a update today, 04/07 and this bug is back. I wonder which package triggered it again... gnome vfs? -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
I confirm that I have had no ATA errors since the removal of fglrx driver. -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Removed fglrx yesterday and so far no errors... I will be back in a week. -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Hi, back. I am using kernel - Linux orion 2.6.32-23-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 11 07:54:58 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux. I formatted my disk and did a fresh ubuntu install, applied all updates, etc. I had been using Lucid and it seemed that this issue disappeared. Today I went and installed the latest Google Chrome 32bit deb package. I have noticed that, together with Flash plugin, this could cause the ata bug. So it's better if people check if they're running Chrome with Flash while having this issue. Specially those using ATI Catalyst proprietary drivers. Since long time I haven't seen the issue, it is quite a coincidence it happened again just right after Chrome installation and seeing a couple of YouTube videos. It's important to observe the presence of Catalyst as a potential ruiner too. -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
I've been testing the system for eight hours without Chrome or Flash plugin. As I told, I had done a Catalyst 10.6 installation prior to the previous mentioned software here. I suspect that fglrx is causing all this trouble. I realized an hour ago that my dmesg log was full of SATA errors while the computer was idle. And the machine was error-free for 10 days, before I installed fglrx. Sure that I feel like a fool giving fglrx another chance, as I always do (Patience is running out though, and I never will be buying ATI stuff again). But installing fglrx today just showed me how this bug and fglrx can be related on AMD based boards. -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
Users: I have only local users. Password: Users have a password, but I turn off the asking password option through the dialogue Users Groups. No special tweaking. It's is a standard pam password. -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
I can confirm that the commands above HAVE FINALLY FIXED the problem to me. sudo aptitude install libpam-gnome-keyring=2.92.92.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3 sudo aptitude install gnome-keyring=2.92.92.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3 Guess I won't be updating these two packages in the next updates :-) -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
I called it a day yesterday... I was unable to trace this bug. I made a clean install, but I can give you some hints of what it could be. As I tweak the system a lot, I must say that had the following applications installed. - VirtualBox Full Edition - Radeon VGA driver for HD 3200. - My GDM was passwordless - I removed all panel applets, but something intrigued me after I called it a day. The weather applet, which was grabbing forecast from a city nearby. It could be this applet... Another thing that had been annoying me was frequent boots followed by turn-offs. The moment ubuntu start booting, it turns the computer off. Once in a while. So that was annoying me. I believe it was related to frequent Catalyst installs and de-installs, because everytime I try a new Catalyst, is just to be frustrated as hell, and then there is the whole uninstallation process. I made a clean install and installed all the full updates, so far, no problems, but as soon as this bug appears, I will be reporting. It must be some alien component doing something to the system. -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
I just CAN'T believe my eyes... problem is back steady and firm. -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
OK, I just spotted the cause of this bug. When you select System - Administration - Users and Groups and you modify the password settings and select Do not ask for a password when session starts is what is possibly triggering this behaviour, so it is a GDM issue, possibly. Try to reproduce the bug by doing this configuration. Cleaning the system was good to me anyway, it narrowed down what is triggering. If you know of any possible log to read, please refer which file it is. I hope this bug is cornered now. -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
I really don't think so. I had passwordless configuration in Karmic and in Lucid. The difference is that in Lucid you can actually set this through the GUI now. It had worked since the release, until a gnome- overall update in the past week or two. -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
I had passwordless option since Karmic. I did a full clean install of Lucid, and used the passwordless option since the release day. As I said, when this whole thing started, I checked my logs and the startup applications. Turned off everything, nothing worked. Then I got pissed and did a new full system clean install. After the first reboot, I updated the system with all packages due. It was a 178MB download. I kept using the system normally, with normal GDM asking password. But the moment I went to the User and Groups configuration and turned on the option Do not ask for a password upon session start, the problem immediately started. Right after the next logoff and back on. I think you can emulate this with a virtual machine, install a clean ubuntu, update the whole system. Create more 2 users and tell all users to skip password from the preferences of User and Groups. Restart the system and see what happens. By the way, i386 here. -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
Ok, I followed your advice and enabled the lucid-proposed updates. I have installed all of them as of tonight. It didn't solve the issue. Firstly I installed the libpam packages and related, after that appindicator related packages and kerberos-related... Didn't work and finally I selected all of them, and it did not worked. -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
LOL.. I hope nothing of this screws the system again, I will try backports. -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
I haven't seen anything related to GDM or Gnome in the backports, and it's not supported. I think I am gonna wait for the development of this, meanwhile I will just login with a password... (works instantaneously). -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
I think I made a mistake, this is suited to gnome panel or ubuntu desktop bugs. Will test now if turning off applications of startup session helps. -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
Turned off every single thing in the System - Preferences - Startup Applications. Panel delay still up. -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] Re: gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
To put it better, I turned off everything at once. ** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) = gnome-panel (Ubuntu) -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397096] Re: ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s
Installed the last kernel via update, and problem seems to be gone... didn't show up for 4 days now... Used to show up at least once every 2 days. Linux my-desktop 2.6.32-22-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 3 22:02:19 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux I'll keep testing this... -- ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Installed the last kernel via update, and problem seems to be gone... didn't show up for 4 days now... Used to show up at least once every 2 days. Linux my-desktop 2.6.32-22-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 3 22:02:19 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593226] [NEW] gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load
Public bug reported: After a few updates, gnome panels now have a 25 second delay after the session is loaded entirely. The desktop shows up, the icons in the desktop show up, but the panels are invisible for 25 seconds... They seem invisible because then you kill gnome-panel from terminal, the desktop icon positions move and then they are back again some milimeters where they were, implying that at least the panel space is being loaded. Killer bug! No apparent stuff on .xessions-errors, default applets. Deleted .gconf .gnome2 .gconfd and problem did not go away. Affects all users. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome panels suddenly have a 25 second delay after session load https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593226 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397096] Re: ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s
I really don't think this is hardware related. I just ran ESTOOL utility on my drive and did extensive tests. The drive is pristine. I am sure some die hard bug in the kernel is causing this. This whole thing started 3 months after Karmic Koala release... I may try a stock kernel since we may be suffering some kind of ubuntu clever kernel tweaks... -- ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397096] Re: ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s
One more thing, is there a way to disable NCQ on the system? -- ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397096] Re: ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s
Problem vanished for a day, but back again.
Strangely, when in SATA mode, it gives errors reported in this post.
When in AHCI mode, it gives errors reported in this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/285892
[ 1550.84] ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
[ 1550.97] ata3.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
[ 1550.000114] ata3.00: cmd 61/10:00:23:82:2f/00:00:08:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 8192
out
[ 1550.000117] res 40/00:00:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4
(timeout)
[ 1550.000125] ata3.00: status: { DRDY }
[ 1550.000135] ata3: hard resetting link
[ 1550.484467] ata3: softreset failed (device not ready)
[ 1550.484478] ata3: applying SB600 PMP SRST workaround and retrying
[ 1550.652070] ata3: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
[ 1550.663374] ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133
[ 1550.663388] ata3.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0
[ 1550.663410] ata3: EH complete
--
ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397096
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285892] Re: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
Definitely this is a bug... i'm getting reports at university... it would be such a coincidence hard drives failing at worldwide scale. I think this is definitely the linux kernel. Please also refer to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/397096 -- ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x807f SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285892 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397096] Re: ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s
Ok, I am doing an experiment. So far it worked... I went to BIOS and changed from SATA mode, to AHCI mode. My BIOS is an ASUS Bios, M3A78-EM. There is SATA Configuration entry right in the first BIOS screen. Then it gives you three modes: SATA RAID AHCI It was on SATA all this time, and I have changed to AHCI. So far problem is gone. People having this problem, please do the same to see if that narrows down the cause of this issue. (Particurlarly caused by kernel ata drivers). -- ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 141500] Re: Doesn't notice change of mouse pointer theme (reverted to non-gconf backend?)
Thanks! Just an errata to post #21 it should read Until you have the default directory DELETED, you won't... etc -- Doesn't notice change of mouse pointer theme (reverted to non-gconf backend?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397096] Re: ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s
Problem persists in Lucid. Random 30 second lock ups and resuming... -- ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 494699] Re: Does not support current Lucid kernel (2.6.32) or xserver (1.7)
I have installed fglrx successfully, HOWEVER, its performance is around 4300 FPS. WAS 18200 in Karmic Koala. -- Does not support current Lucid kernel (2.6.32) or xserver (1.7) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494699 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 141500] Re: Doesn't notice change of mouse pointer theme (reverted to non-gconf backend?)
I am talking about this exact same script above: the one involving $HOME/.icons/default/index.theme My ubuntu is latest lucid lynx 10.04, I run this script inside my home dir, using $ ./compiz_fix which is the name I gave it. I reproduced this way: compiz enabled, you change the cursor to DMZ- White and then you move the size slider to bigger size (medium), then you run the script right after, restaring compiz. For any other cursor it will work, but particurlaly with DMZ cursors, it won't just let it be sized, but it will also crash titlebars and then you lose your GNOME session. Until you have the default directory undeleted, you won't be able to use the system - frequently segfaults. I rebooted many times, no way. Solution was to delete default dir created inside .icons. Maybe this happened because of fglrx or radeon driver. because it happens with both. -- Doesn't notice change of mouse pointer theme (reverted to non-gconf backend?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 141500] Re: Doesn't notice change of mouse pointer theme (reverted to non-gconf backend?)
@ dRewsus, Dude your workaround seems to cause the system to get GNOME unstable, inoperable. The two times I tried this workaround, it would segfault every GNOME application. The solution seems to delete the default folder created by the script. -- Doesn't notice change of mouse pointer theme (reverted to non-gconf backend?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 546578] Re: [RS480] black screen after a few user switches
My hardware: ATI HD 3200. I can confirm this bug, and I can confirm the workaround. Switching users from the User Switcher panel applet DOES WORK instead of using the Indicator panel applet. What a damn annoying bug ! It cost me a few reboots until I figured it out. -- [RS480] black screen after a few user switches https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546578 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561538] Re: Logout after switch user cause black screen
Same issue here with 10.04. ATI HD 3200 IGP either with Radeon driver OR Fglrx. Very Annoying bug. -- Logout after switch user cause black screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397096] Re: ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s
Freezes still continue... occasionally... every 4 hours... -- ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397096] Re: ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s
Just so you know, optical media in my drive DOES NOT stop this bug. Occasional freezes occurs... same 30 second hd-led lit... I am going to try replacing hdparm for the true wrapper. Hope it works. Can't wait for Lucid Lynx now.,, -- ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397096] Re: ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s
I want to join the team and say that this bug is ANNOYING the hell out of me. It's like the original poster said: The computer halts for 30 seconds and the HD led goes lit, after that it resumes normal operation. I tried the CD-ROM workaround but it doesn't work. Right after when I issue dmesg, similiar SATA errors come up in the screen. I have a SAMSUNG 160GB HD161HJ, in Normal IDE Mode in BIOS. Ubuntu Karmic 9.10 Linux orion 2.6.31-20-generic #58-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 12 05:23:09 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux My filesystem are all ext3. So I don't think this is ext4 related at all. Please fix this! -- ata exception and hang when booting, at T=n.81606 s https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
